Enabler or inhibitor? Educational technology in self and peer assessment

ASCILITE 2016 - Conference Proceedings - 33rd International Conference of Innovation, Practice and Research in the Use of Educational Technologies in Tertiary Education: Show Me the Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 11-16

  Adachi, Chie ^a   Tai, Joanna ^a   Dawson, Phillip ^a  

^a DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Educational technology; Higher education; Self and peer assessment

Indexed keywords

EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY;

CURRENT TECHNOLOGY; EDUCATIONAL CONTEXT; ENHANCED LEARNING; HIGHER EDUCATION; LEARNING OPPORTUNITY; ONLINE SURVEYS; PEER ASSESSMENT; TECHNOLOGY SUPPORT;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 85071956009     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Bennett, S., Dawson, P., Bearman, M., Molloy, E., & Boud, D. (2016). How technology shapes assessment design: Findings from a study of university teachers. British Journal of Educational Technology.
2. Boud, D., & Falchikov, N. (2007). Rethinking assessment in higher education: learning for the longer term: London; New York: Routledge, 2007.
3. Boud, D., Lawson, R., & Thompson, D. G. (2013). Does student engagement in self-assessment calibrate their judgement over time? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(8), 941-956.
4. Boud, D., & Soler, R. (2015). Sustainable assessment revisited. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 1-14.
5. Boud, D., & Tyree, A. (1980). Self and peer assessment in professional education: a preliminary study in law. J. Soc't Pub. Tchrs. L. ns, 15, 65.
6. Brindley, C., & Scoffield, S. (1998). Peer assessment in undergraduate programmes. Teaching in Higher Education, 3(1), 79-90.
7. Brown, G. T. L., Andrade, H. L., & Chen, F. (2015). Accuracy in student self-assessment: directions and cautions for research. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 22(4), 444-457. doi:10.1080/0969594X.2014.996523
8. Hamer, J., Purchase, H., Luxton-Reilly, A., & Denny, P. (2015). A comparison of peer and tutor feedback. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(1), 151-164. doi:10.1080/02602938.2014.893418
9. Kulkarni, C., Wei, K. P., Le, H., Chia, D., Papadopoulos, K., Cheng, J., . . . Klemmer, S. R. (2015). Peer and self assessment in massive online classes Design Thinking Research (pp. 131-168): Springer.
10. Liu, N.-F., & Carless, D. (2006). Peer feedback: the learning element of peer assessment. Teaching in Higher Education, 11(3), 279-290.
11. Murdoch, J. (2015). Using self- and peer assessment at honours level: bridging the gap between law school and the workplace. The Law Teacher, 49(1), 73-91.
12. Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer assisted learning, 26(1), 65-73. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2009.00338.x
13. Stödberg, U. (2012). A research review of e-assessment. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 37(5), 591-604. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.557496
14. Tomas, C., Borg, M., & McNeil, J. (2015). E-assessment: Institutional development strategies and the assessment life cycle. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(3), 588-596. doi:10.1111/bjet.12153
15. Topping, K. (1998). Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of educational research, 68(3), 249-276.
16. Vaismoradi, M., Turunen, H., & Bondas, T. (2013). Content analysis and thematic analysis: Implications for conducting a qualitative descriptive study. Nursing & health sciences, 15(3), 398-405.
17. Yucel, R., Bird, F. L., Young, J., & Blanksby, T. (2014). The road to self-assessment: exemplar marking before peer review develops first-year students’ capacity to judge the quality of a scientific report. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 39(8), 971-986.