How technology shapes assessment design: Findings from a study of university teachers

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2017, Pages 672-682

  Bennett, Sue ^a   Dawson, Phillip ^b   Bearman, Margaret ^c   Molloy, Elizabeth ^c   Boud, David ^b,d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

^b DEAKIN UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^c MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^d MIDDLESEX UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AIR NAVIGATION; DESIGN; EDUCATION; FEEDBACK; TEACHING;

DESIGN PROCESS; ITERATIVE APPROACH; STUDENT BEHAVIOR; STUDENT LEARNING; TECHNICAL HELP; TECHNOLOGY ADOPTION; TECHNOLOGY SUPPORTED ASSESSMENTS; UNIVERSITY TEACHERS;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 84963700040     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bjet.12439     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Atkinson, D., & Lim, S. L. (2013). Improving assessment processes in higher education: student and teacher perceptions of the effectiveness of a rubric embedded in a LMS. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29, 5, 651–666.
2. Buckley, E., & Cowap, L. (2013). An evaluation of the use of Turnitin for electronic submission and marking and as a formative feedback tool from an educator's perspective. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, 4, 562–570.
3. Carless, D. (2009). Trust, distrust and their impact on assessment reform. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34, 1, 79–89.
4. Daly, C., Pachler, N., Mor, Y., & Mellar, H. (2010). Exploring formative e-assessment: using case stories and design patterns. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 5, 619636.
5. Dawson, P., Bearman, M., Boud, D., Hall, M., Molloy, E., Bennett, S., & Joughin, J. (2013). Assessment might dictate the curriculum, but what dictates assessment?. Teaching and Learning Inquiry, 1, 1, 107–111.
6. Fenwick, T., Edwards, R., & Sawchuk, P. (2011). Emerging approaches to educational research: tracing the sociomaterial. London: Routledge.
7. Jump, L. (2011). Why university lecturers enhance their teaching through the use of technology: a systematic review. Learning, Media and Technology, 36, 1, 55–68.
8. King, E., & Boyatt, R. (2014). Exploring factors that influence adoption of e-learning within higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46, 1272–1280.
9. Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2013). Missing: evidence of a scholarly approach to teaching and learning with technology in higher education. Teaching in Higher Education, 18, 3, 327–337.
10. Kulkarni, C., Wei, K. P., Le, H., Chia, D., Papadopoulos, K., Cheng, J., et al (2013). Peer and self-assessment in massive online classes. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 20, 6, 1–31.
11. Nicol, D. (2010). From monologue to dialogue: improving written feedback processes in mass higher education. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 35, 5, 501–517.
12. Nix, I., & Wyllie, A. (2011). Exploring design features to enhance computer-based assessment: learners’ views on using a confidence-indicator tool and computer-based feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 42, 1, 101–112.
13. Schmid, R., Bernard, R., Borokhovski, E., Tamim, R., Abrami, P., Wade, C. A., et al (2009). Technology's effect on achievement in higher education: a Stage I meta-analysis of classroom applications. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21, 2, 95–109.
14. Selwyn, N. (2010). Looking beyond learning: Notes towards the critical study of educational technology. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 65–73.
15. Snodgrass, S. J., Ashby, S. E., Rivett, D. A., & Russell, T. (2014). Implementation of an electronic objective structured clinical exam for assessing practical skills in pre-professional physiotherapy and occupational therapy programs: examiner and course coordinator perspectives. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 30, 2, 152–166.
16. Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. F. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning. Review of Educational Research, 81, 1, 4–28.
17. Warburton, B. (2009). Quick win or slow burn: modelling UK HE CAA uptake. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34, 3, 257–272.