메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 21, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 545-556

Support for assessment practice: developing the Assessment Design Decisions Framework

Author keywords

Assessment; decision making; educational design; feedback; higher education

Indexed keywords


EID: 84961391612     PISSN: 13562517     EISSN: 14701294     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13562517.2016.1160217     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (76)

References (28)
  • 1
    • 77951262697 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Is the Feedback in Higher Education Assessment Worth the Paper it is Written on? Teachers’ Reflections on Their Practices
    • R.Bailey, Richard, and M.GarnerMark. 2010. “Is the Feedback in Higher Education Assessment Worth the Paper it is Written on? Teachers’ Reflections on Their Practices.” Teaching in Higher Education 15 (2): 187–198. doi: 10.1080/13562511003620019
    • (2010) Teaching in Higher Education , vol.15 , Issue.2 , pp. 187-198
    • Bailey, R.1    Garner, M.2
  • 2
    • 84975197875 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • “Assessment Design Decisions Framework.” Accessed October 9
    • M.Bearman, Margaret, P.DawsonPhillip, D.BoudDavid, M.HallMatt, S.BennettSue, E.MolloyElizabeth, and G.JoughinGordon. 2014a. “Assessment Design Decisions Framework.” Accessed October 9. http://www.assessmentdecisions.org/framework/.
    • (2014)
    • Bearman, M.1    Dawson, P.2    Boud, D.3    Hall, M.4    Bennett, S.5    Molloy, E.6    Joughin, G.7
  • 3
    • 84975192180 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • “Guide to the Assessment Design Decisions Framework.” Accessed October 3
    • M.Bearman, Margaret, P.DawsonPhillip, D.BoudDavid, M.HallMatt, S.BennettSue, E.MolloyElizabeth, and G.JoughinGordon. 2014b. “Guide to the Assessment Design Decisions Framework.” Accessed October 3. http://www.assessmentdecisions.org/guide/.
    • (2014)
    • Bearman, M.1    Dawson, P.2    Boud, D.3    Hall, M.4    Bennett, S.5    Molloy, E.6    Joughin, G.7
  • 4
    • 79957603228 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Understanding the Design Context for Australian University Teachers: Implications for the Future of Learning Design
    • S.Bennett, Sue, L.ThomasLisa, S.AgostinhoShirley, L.LockyerLori, J.JonesJennifer, and B.HarperBarry. 2011. “Understanding the Design Context for Australian University Teachers: Implications for the Future of Learning Design.” Learning, Media and Technology 36 (2): 151–167. doi: 10.1080/17439884.2011.553622
    • (2011) Learning, Media and Technology , vol.36 , Issue.2 , pp. 151-167
    • Bennett, S.1    Thomas, L.2    Agostinho, S.3    Lockyer, L.4    Jones, J.5    Harper, B.6
  • 5
    • 77956830651 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Teachers’ Decision Making: from Alan J. Bishop to Today Critical Issues in Mathematics Education
    • Clarkson P., Presmeg N., (eds), New York: Springer
    • H.Borko, Hilda, S.A.RobertsSarah A., R.ShavelsonRichard, P.ClarksonPhilip, and N.PresmegNorma. 2008. “Teachers’ Decision Making: from Alan J. Bishop to Today Critical Issues in Mathematics Education.” In Critical Issues in Mathematics Education: Major Contributions of Alan Bishop, edited by P.ClarksonPhilip and N.PresmegNorma, 37–67. New York: Springer.
    • (2008) Critical Issues in Mathematics Education: Major Contributions of Alan Bishop , pp. 37-67
    • Borko, H.1    Roberts, S.A.2    Shavelson, R.3    Clarkson, P.4    Presmeg, N.5
  • 6
    • 0346289571 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking Assessment for the Learning Society
    • D.Boud, David. 2000. “Sustainable Assessment: Rethinking Assessment for the Learning Society.” Studies in Continuing Education 22 (2): 151–167. doi: 10.1080/713695728
    • (2000) Studies in Continuing Education , vol.22 , Issue.2 , pp. 151-167
    • Boud, D.1
  • 8
    • 84879665126 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design
    • D.Boud, David, and E.MolloyElizabeth. 2013. “Rethinking Models of Feedback for Learning: The Challenge of Design.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 38 (6): 698–712. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2012.691462
    • (2013) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.38 , Issue.6 , pp. 698-712
    • Boud, D.1    Molloy, E.2
  • 11
    • 84975192677 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • “Improving Assessment: Understanding Educational Decision-Making in Practice.” Final report to the Office for Learning & Teaching
    • P.Dawson, Phillip, M.BearmanMargaret, E.MolloyElizabeth, D.BoudDavid, G.JoughinGordon, and S.BennettSue. 2014. “Improving Assessment: Understanding Educational Decision-Making in Practice.” Final report to the Office for Learning & Teaching. http://www.olt.gov.au/project-improving-assessment-understanding-educational-decision-making-practice-2012
    • (2014)
    • Dawson, P.1    Bearman, M.2    Molloy, E.3    Boud, D.4    Joughin, G.5    Bennett, S.6
  • 13
    • 31744450431 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Teachers’ Conceptions of Teaching, and the Making of Specific Decisions in Planning to Teach
    • M.Eley, Malcolm. 2006. “Teachers’ Conceptions of Teaching, and the Making of Specific Decisions in Planning to Teach.” Higher Education 51 (2): 191–214. doi: 10.1007/s10734-004-6382-9
    • (2006) Higher Education , vol.51 , Issue.2 , pp. 191-214
    • Eley, M.1
  • 15
    • 84860558131 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Faculty and Students Conceptions of Assessment in Higher Education
    • R.B.Fletcher, Richard B., L.H.MeyerLuanna H., H.AndersonHelen, P.JohnstonPatricia, and M.ReesMalcolm. 2012. “Faculty and Students Conceptions of Assessment in Higher Education.” Higher Education 64 (1): 119–133. doi: 10.1007/s10734-011-9484-1
    • (2012) Higher Education , vol.64 , Issue.1 , pp. 119-133
    • Fletcher, R.B.1    Meyer, L.H.2    Anderson, H.3    Johnston, P.4    Rees, M.5
  • 19
    • 84885730688 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Changing Assessment in Higher Education: A Model in Support of Institution-Wide Improvement
    • Joughin G., (ed), Dordrecht: Springer
    • R.Macdonald, Ranald, and G.JoughinGordon. 2009. “Changing Assessment in Higher Education: A Model in Support of Institution-Wide Improvement.” In Assessment, Learning and Judgement in Higher Education, edited by G.JoughinGordon, 1–21. Dordrecht: Springer.
    • (2009) Assessment, Learning and Judgement in Higher Education , pp. 1-21
    • Macdonald, R.1    Joughin, G.2
  • 20
    • 77955165798 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • An Investigation of Tertiary Assessment Policy and Practice: Alignment and Contradictions
    • L.H.Meyer, Luanna H., S.DavidsonSusan, L.McKenzieLynanne, M.ReesMalcolm, H.AndersonHelen, R.FletcherRichard, and P.M.JohnstonPatricia M. 2010. “An Investigation of Tertiary Assessment Policy and Practice: Alignment and Contradictions.” Higher Education Quarterly 64 (3): 331–350. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2273.2010.00459.x
    • (2010) Higher Education Quarterly , vol.64 , Issue.3 , pp. 331-350
    • Meyer, L.H.1    Davidson, S.2    McKenzie, L.3    Rees, M.4    Anderson, H.5    Fletcher, R.6    Johnston, P.M.7
  • 21
    • 79955551589 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • From Monologue to Dialogue: Improving Written Feedback Processes in Mass Higher Education
    • D.J.Nicol, David J. 2010. “From Monologue to Dialogue: Improving Written Feedback Processes in Mass Higher Education.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 35 (5): 501–517. doi: 10.1080/02602931003786559
    • (2010) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.35 , Issue.5 , pp. 501-517
    • Nicol, D.J.1
  • 22
    • 33645227268 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice
    • D.J.Nicol, David J, and D.Macfarlane-DickDebra. 2006. “Formative Assessment and Self-Regulated Learning: A Model and Seven Principles of Good Feedback Practice.” Studies in Higher Education 31 (2): 199–218. doi: 10.1080/03075070600572090
    • (2006) Studies in Higher Education , vol.31 , Issue.2 , pp. 199-218
    • Nicol, D.J.1    Macfarlane-Dick, D.2
  • 23
    • 84880603294 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Revitalising Assessment Design: What is Holding New Lecturers Back?
    • L.Norton, Lin, B.NortonBill, and L.ShannonLee. 2013. “Revitalising Assessment Design: What is Holding New Lecturers Back?” Higher Education 66 (2): 233–251. doi: 10.1007/s10734-012-9601-9
    • (2013) Higher Education , vol.66 , Issue.2 , pp. 233-251
    • Norton, L.1    Norton, B.2    Shannon, L.3
  • 24
    • 84860689575 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Changes in Instructors’ Assessment Thinking Related to Experimentation with New Strategies
    • E.G.Offerdahl, Erika G., and D.TomanekDebra. 2011. “Changes in Instructors’ Assessment Thinking Related to Experimentation with New Strategies.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (7): 781–795. doi: 10.1080/02602938.2010.488794
    • (2011) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.36 , Issue.7 , pp. 781-795
    • Offerdahl, E.G.1    Tomanek, D.2
  • 25
    • 84884417605 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What is on Your Mind? Using the Perceptual Cycle Model and Critical Decision Method to Understand the Decision-Making Process in the Cockpit
    • K.L.Plant, Katherine L., and N.A.StantonNeville A. 2013. “What is on Your Mind? Using the Perceptual Cycle Model and Critical Decision Method to Understand the Decision-Making Process in the Cockpit.” Ergonomics 56 (8): 1232–1250. doi: 10.1080/00140139.2013.809480
    • (2013) Ergonomics , vol.56 , Issue.8 , pp. 1232-1250
    • Plant, K.L.1    Stanton, N.A.2
  • 26
    • 79958811303 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • If I Was Going There I Wouldn't Start from Here: A Critical Commentary on Current Assessment Practice
    • M.Price, Margaret, J.CarrollJude, B.O'DonovanBerry, and C.RustChris. 2011. “If I Was Going There I Wouldn't Start from Here: A Critical Commentary on Current Assessment Practice.” Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education 36 (4): 479–492. doi: 10.1080/02602930903512883
    • (2011) Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education , vol.36 , Issue.4 , pp. 479-492
    • Price, M.1    Carroll, J.2    O'Donovan, B.3    Rust, C.4
  • 27
    • 84857120906 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Using the Analytic Rubric as an Evaluation Tool in Nursing Education: The Positive and the Negative
    • D.Shipman, Debra, M.RoaMichelle, J.HootenJack, and Z.Jenny WangZhan. 2012. “Using the Analytic Rubric as an Evaluation Tool in Nursing Education: The Positive and the Negative.” Nurse Education Today 32 (3): 246–249. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2011.04.007
    • (2012) Nurse Education Today , vol.32 , Issue.3 , pp. 246-249
    • Shipman, D.1    Roa, M.2    Hooten, J.3    Jenny Wang, Z.4


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.