Design of a three-dimensional cognitive mapping approach to support inquiry learning

Educational Technology and Society

Volumn 20, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 191-204

  Chen, Juanjuan ^a   Wang, Minhong ^a   Dede, Chris ^b   Grotzer, Tina A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^b HARVARD GRADUATE SCHOOL OF EDUCATION   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive mapping; External representation; Inquiry learning; Reasoning; Science education

Indexed keywords

EID: 85032210675     PISSN: 11763647     EISSN: 14364522     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Armbruster, B. B., & Anderson, T. H. (1980). The Effect of mapping on the free recall of expository text (Technical Report No. 160). Urbana, IL: University of Illinois, Center for the Study of Reading
2. Belland, B. R., Glazewski, K. D., & Richardson, J. C. (2011). Problem-based learning and argumentation: Testing a scaffolding framework to support middle school students' creation of evidence-based arguments. Instructional Science, 39(5), 667-694
3. Bransford, J., Brown, A. L., & Cocking, R. E. (Eds.) (1999). How people learn: Brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
4. Cheng, B., Wang, M., & Mercer, N. (2014). Effects of role assignment in concept mapping mediated small group learning. The Internet and Higher Education, 23, 27-38
5. Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Tseng, J. C. (2010). A Two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science courses. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1618-1627
6. Cox, R. (1999). Representation construction, externalised cognition and individual differences. Learning and Instruction, 9(4), 343-363
7. Dalgarno, B., Bishop, A. G., Adlong, W., & Bedgood, D. R. (2009). Effectiveness of a virtual laboratory as a preparatory resource for distance education chemistry students. Computers & Education, 53(3), 853-865
8. De Jong, T. (1991). Learning and instruction with computer simulations. Education and Computing, 6(3/4), 217-229
9. De Jong, T., Linn, M. C., & Zacharia, Z. C. (2013). Physical and virtual laboratories in science and engineering education. Science, 340(6130), 305-308
10. De Jong, T., & van Joolingen, W. R. (1998). Scientific discovery learning with computer simulations of conceptual domains. Review of Educational Research, 68(2), 179-201
11. Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science, 323(5910), 66-69
12. Dori, Y. J., Tal, R. T., & Tsaushu, M. (2003). Teaching biotechnology through case studies-Can we improve higher order thinking skills of nonscience majors? Science Education, 87(6), 767-793
13. Eseryel, D., Law, V., Ifenthaler, D., Ge, X., & Miller, R. (2013). An Investigation of the interrelationships between motivation, engagement, and complex problem solving in game-based learning. Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 42-53
14. Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109
15. Gijlers, H., & de Jong, T. (2013). Using concept maps to facilitate collaborative simulation-based inquiry learning. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 22(3), 340-374
16. Guastello, E. F., Beasley, T. M., & Sinatra, R. C. (2000). Concept mapping effects on science content comprehension of lowachieving inner-city seventh graders. Remedial and Special Education, 21(6), 356-364
17. Hmelo-Silver, C. E., Duncan, R. G., & Chinn, C. A. (2007). Scaffolding and achievement in problem-based and inquiry learning: A Response to Kirschner, Sweller, and Clark (2006). Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 99-107
18. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kanselaar, G. (2010). Effects of representational guidance during computersupported collaborative learning. Instructional Science, 38(1), 59-88
19. Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2005). How students describe the sources of their emotional and motivational experiences during the learning process: A Qualitative approach. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 465-480
20. Jonassen, D. H. (2005). Tools for representing problems and the knowledge required to solve them. In S. O. Tergan & T. Keller (Eds.), Knowledge and Information Visualization (pp. 82-94). Berlin, Germany: Springer
21. Jones, A., & Issroff, K. (2005). Learning technologies: Affective and social issues in computer-supported collaborative learning. Computers & Education, 44(4), 395-408
22. Kamarainen, A., Metcalf, S., Grotzer, T., & Dede, C. (2014). Understanding data variability in ecosystems: Blending MUVE and mobile technologies to support reasoning with real world data. In Proceedings of the International Conference of the Learning Sciences (Vol. 3, pp. 1581-1582). Boulder, CO: International Society of the Learning Sciences
23. Kamarainen, A. M., Metcalf, S., Grotzer, T., & Dede, C. (2015). Exploring ecosystems from the inside: How immersive multi-user virtual environments can support development of epistemologically grounded modeling practices in ecosystem science instruction. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2/3), 148-167
24. Keller, J. M. (2010). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. Boston, MA: Springer
25. Keselman, A., Kaufman, D. R., Kramer, S., & Patel, V. L. (2007). Fostering conceptual change and critical reasoning about HIV and AIDS. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 844-863
26. Keys, C. W. (2000). Investigating the thinking processes of eighth grade writers during the composition of a scientific laboratory report. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(7), 676-690
27. Kirschner, P. A., Sweller, J., & Clark, R. E. (2006). Why minimal guidance during instruction does not work: An Analysis of the failure of constructivist, discovery, problem-based, experiential, and inquiry-based teaching. Educational Psychologist, 41(2), 75-86
28. Kollar, I., Fischer, F., & Slotta, J. D. (2007). Internal and external scripts in computer-supported collaborative inquiry learning. Learning and Instruction, 17(6), 708-721
29. Kuhn, D., Black, J., Keselman, A., & Kaplan, D. (2000). The Development of cognitive skills to support inquiry learning. Cognition and Instruction, 18(4), 495-523
30. Lazonder, A. W., & Harmsen, R. (2016). Meta-analysis of inquiry-based learning: Effects of guidance. Review of Educational Research, 86(3), 681-718
31. Linn, M. C., & Slotta, J. D. (2000). WISE science. Educational Leadership, 58(2), 29-32
32. Liu, M. (2004). Examining the performance and attitudes of sixth graders during their use of a problem-based hypermedia learning environment. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(3), 357-379
33. Liu, P. L., Chen, C. J., & Chang, Y. J. (2010). Effects of a computer-assisted concept mapping learning strategy on EFL college students' English reading comprehension. Computers & Education, 54(2), 436-445
34. Lou, Y., Abrami, P. C., Spence, J. C., Poulsen, C., Chambers, B., & D'Apollonia, S. (1996). Within-class grouping: A Metaanalysis. Review of Educational Research, 66(4), 423-458
35. Muilenburg, L. Y., & Berge, Z. L. (2005). Students barriers to online learning: A Factor analytic study. Distance Education, 26(1), 29-48
36. O'Donnell, A. M., Dansereau, D. F., & Hall, R. H. (2002). Knowledge maps as scaffolds for cognitive processing. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 71-86
37. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students' learning and performance: The Achievement Emotions Questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36(1), 36-48
38. Perkins, D. N., & Grotzer, T. A. (2005). Dimensions of causal understanding: The Role of complex causal models in students' understanding of science. Studies in Science Education, 41, 117-165
39. Phielix, C., Prins, F. J., & Kirschner, P. A. (2010). Awareness of group performance in a CSCL-environment: Effects of peer feedback and reflection. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 151-161
40. Schnotz, W. (2002). Commentary: Towards an integrated view of learning from text and visual displays. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 101-120
41. Schutz, P. A., & DeCuir, J. T. (2002). Inquiry on emotions in education. Educational Psychologist, 37(2), 125-134
42. Schwendimann, B. A. (2015). Concept maps as versatile tools to integrate complex ideas: From kindergarten to higher and professional education. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 7(1), 73-99
43. Schwendimann, B. A., & Linn, M. C. (2016). Comparing two forms of concept map critique activities to facilitate knowledge integration processes in evolution education. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(1), 70-94
44. Slof, B., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., Janssen, J., & Jaspers, J. G. M. (2012). Successfully carrying out complex learning-tasks through guiding teams' qualitative and quantitative reasoning. Instructional Science, 40(3), 623-643
45. Sung, H. Y., & Hwang, G. J. (2013). A Collaborative game-based learning approach to improving students' learning performance in science courses. Computers & Education, 63, 43-51
46. Suthers, D. D., Vatrapu, R., Medina, R., Joseph, S., & Dwyer, N. (2008). Beyond threaded discussion: Representational guidance in asynchronous collaborative learning environments. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1103-1127
47. Toth, E. E., Suthers, D. D., & Lesgold, A. M. (2002). 'Mapping to know': The Effects of representational guidance and reflective assessment on scientific inquiry. Science Education, 86(2), 264-286
48. Veermans, M., & Järvelä, S. (2004). Generalized achievement goals and situational coping in inquiry learning. Instructional Science, 32(4), 269-291
49. Wang, M., Cheng, B., Chen, J., Mercer, N., & Kirschner, P. A. (2017). The Use of web-based collaborative concept mapping to support group learning and interaction in an online environment. The Internet and Higher Education, 34, 28-40
50. Wang, M., Wu, B., Kinshuk, Chen, N. S., & Spector, J. M. (2013). Connecting problem-solving and knowledge-construction processes in a visualization-based learning environment. Computers & Education, 68, 293-306
51. Wong, W. K., Yin, S. K., Yang, H. H., & Cheng, Y. H. (2011). Using computer-assisted multiple representations in learning geometry proofs. Educational Technology & Society, 14(3), 43-54
52. Wosnitza, M., & Volet, S. (2005). Origin, direction and impact of emotions in social online learning. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 449-464
53. Wu, B., & Wang, M. (2012). Integrating problem solving and knowledge construction through dual mapping. Knowledge Management & E-Learning (KM&EL), 4(3), 248-257
54. Wu, B., Wang, M., Grotzer, T. A., Liu, J., & Johnson, J. M. (2016). Visualizing complex processes using a cognitive-mapping tool to support the learning of clinical reasoning. BMC Medical Education, 16(1), 216. doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0734-x
55. Yerrick, R. K. (2000). Lower track science students' argumentation and open inquiry instruction. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 37(8), 807-838
56. Yuan, B., Wang, M., Kushniruk, A. W., & Peng, J. (2016). Design of a computer-based learning environment to support diagnostic problem solving towards expertise development. Knowledge Management & E-Learning, 8(4), 540-549
57. Zeineddin, A., & Abd-El-Khalick, F. (2010). Scientific reasoning and epistemological commitments: Coordination of theory and evidence among college science students. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(9), 1064-1093
58. Zohar, A., & Dori, Y. J. (2003). Higher order thinking skills and low-achieving students: Are they mutually exclusive? Journal of the Learning Sciences, 12(2), 145-181