Somatic embryogenesis - stress-induced remodeling of plant cell fate

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms

Volumn 1849, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 385-402

  Fehér, Attila ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF EXPERIMENTAL MEDICINE   (Hungary)

Author keywords

Dedifferentiation; DNA methylation; Genetic stability; Histone modification; Plant regeneration; Totipotency

Indexed keywords

CHROMATIN;

CELL DEDIFFERENTIATION; CHROMATIN; EMBRYOLOGY; GENETICS; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; METABOLISM; NUCLEAR REPROGRAMMING; PHYSIOLOGICAL STRESS; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT; PLANT CELL; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANT GENOME; PLANT SEED; SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS;

CELL DEDIFFERENTIATION; CELLULAR REPROGRAMMING; CHROMATIN; GENOME, PLANT; GENOMIC INSTABILITY; PLANT CELLS; PLANT DEVELOPMENT; PLANT SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS TECHNIQUES; PLANTS; SEEDS; STRESS, PHYSIOLOGICAL;

EID: 85028153031     PISSN: 18749399     EISSN: 18764320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2014.07.005     Document Type: Review

References (280)

1. Sultan S.E. Phenotypic plasticity for plant development, function and life history. Trends Plant Sci. 2000, 5:537-542.
2. Scheres B. Stem-cell niches: nursery rhymes across kingdoms. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8:345-354.
3. Birnbaum K., Alvarado A. Slicing across kingdoms: regeneration in plants and animals. Cell 2008, 132:697-710.
4. Xu L., Huang H. Genetic and epigenetic controls of plant regeneration. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2014, 108:1-33.
5. Zimmerman J.L. Somatic embryogenesis: a model for early development in higher plants. Plant Cell 1993, 5:1411-1423.
6. Loyola-Vargas V.M., Vázquez-Flota F. An introduction to plant cell culture: back to the future. Methods Mol. Biol. 2006, 3-8.
7. Sugimoto K., Jiao Y., Meyerowitz E.M. Arabidopsis regeneration from multiple tissues occurs via a root development pathway. Dev. Cell 2010, 18:463-471.
8. Sugimoto K., Gordon S.P., Meyerowitz E.M. Regeneration in plants and animals: dedifferentiation, transdifferentiation, or just differentiation?. Trends Cell Biol. 2011, 21:212-218.
9. Grafi G., Florentin A., Ransbotyn V., Morgenstern Y. The stem cell state in plant development and in response to stress. Front. Plant Sci. 2011, 2:53.
10. Ikeuchi M., Sugimoto K., Iwase A. Plant callus: mechanisms of induction and repression. Plant Cell 2013, 25:3159-3173.
11. Rose R.J., Mantiri F.R., Kurdyukov S., Chen S., Wang X., Nolan K.E., Sheahan M.B. Developmental biology of somatic embryogenesis. Plant Developmental Biology - Biotechnological Perspectives 2010, 3-26. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. E.C. Pua, M.R. Davey (Eds.).
12. Dudits D., Bögre L., Györgyey J. Molecular and cellular approaches to the analysis of plant embryo development from somatic cells in vitro. J. Cell Sci. 1991, 484:475-484.
13. Koltunow A.M. Apomixis: embryo sacs and embryos formed without meiosis or fertilization in ovules. Plant Cell 1993, 5:1425-1437.
14. Garcês H., Sinha N. The 'mother of thousands' (Kalanchoë daigremontiana): aplant model for asexual reproduction and CAM studies. Cold Spring Harb Protoc.2009 2009, pdb.emo133, 10. (PubMed PMID: 20147034). 10.1101/pdb.emo133.
15. Garcês H.M.P., Champagne C.E.M., Townsley B.T., Park S., Malhó R., Pedroso M.C., Harada J.J., Sinha N.R. Evolution of asexual reproduction in leaves of the genus Kalanchoë. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104:15578-15583.
16. Fehér A., Pasternak T.P., Dudits D. Transition of somatic plant cells to an embryogenic state. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2003, 74:201-228.
17. Yang H.Y., Zhou C. In vitro induction of haploid plants from unpollinated ovaries and ovules. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1982, 63:97-104.
18. Reynolds T.L. Pollen embryogenesis. Plant Mol. Biol. 1997, 33:1-10.
19. Dodeman V.L., Ducreux G., Kreis M. Zygotic embryogenesis versus somatic embryogenesis. J. Exp. Bot. 1997, 48:1493-1509.
20. Seguí-Simarro J.M., Nuez F. How microspores transform into haploid embryos: changes associated with embryogenesis induction and microspore-derived embryogenesis. Physiol. Plant. 2008, 134:1-12.
21. Koltunow A.M., Grossniklaus U. Apomixis: a developmental perspective. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2003, 54:547-574.
22. Harada J.J. Plant embryogenesis (zygotic and somatic). Encyclopedia of Life Sciences 2010, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester. 10.1002/9780470015902.a0002042.pub2.
23. Xu N., Bewley J.D. Contrasting pattern of somatic and zygotic embryo development in alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.) as revealed by scanning electron microscopy. Plant Cell Rep. 1992, 11:279-284.
24. Suhasini K., Sagare A., Sainkar S., Krishnamurthy K. Comparative study of the development of zygotic and somatic embryos of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant Sci. 1997, 128:207-216.
25. Jin F., Hu L., Yuan D., Xu J., Gao W., He L., Yang X., Zhang X. Comparative transcriptome analysis between somatic embryos (SEs) and zygotic embryos in cotton: evidence for stress response functions in SE development. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2014, 12:161-173.
26. Ohto M., Floyd S.K., Fischer R.L., Goldberg R.B., Harada J.J. Effects of APETALA2 on embryo, endosperm, and seed coat development determine seed size in Arabidopsis. Sex. Plant Reprod. 2009, 22:277-289.
27. Hehenberger E., Kradolfer D., Köhler C. Endosperm cellularization defines an important developmental transition for embryo development. Development 2012, 139:2031-2039.
28. West M., Harada J.J. Embryogenesis in higher plants: an overview. Plant Cell 1993, 5:1361-1369.
29. Ueda M., Laux T. The origin of the plant body axis. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2012, 15:578-584.
30. Nawy T., Bayer M., Mravec J., Friml J., Birnbaum K.D., Lukowitz W. The GATA factor HANABA TARANU is required to position the proembryo boundary in the early Arabidopsis embryo. Dev. Cell 2010, 19:103-113.
31. Elhiti M., Stasolla C., Wang A. Molecular regulation of plant somatic embryogenesis. In Vitro Cell. Dev. Biol. Plant 2013, 49:631-642.
32. Karami O., Aghavaisi B., Mahmoudi Pour A. Molecular aspects of somatic-to-embryogenic transition in plants. J. Chem. Biol. 2009, 2:177-190.
33. Mayer K.F., Schoof H., Haecker A., Lenhard M., Jürgens G., Laux T. Role of WUSCHEL in regulating stem cell fate in the Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Cell 1998, 95:805-815.
34. Santos-Mendoza M., Dubreucq B., Baud S., Parcy F., Caboche M., Lepiniec L. Deciphering gene regulatory networks that control seed development and maturation in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2008, 54:608-620.
35. Galinha C., Hofhuis H., Luijten M., Willemsen V., Blilou I., Heidstra R., Scheres B. PLETHORA proteins as dose-dependent master regulators of Arabidopsis root development. Nature 2007, 449:1053-1057.
36. Albrecht C., Russinova E., Kemmerling B., Kwaaitaal M., de Vries S.C. Arabidopsis SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR KINASE proteins serve brassinosteroid-dependent and -independent signaling pathways. Plant Physiol. 2008, 148:611-619.
37. Zavattieri M.A., Frederico A.M., Lima M., Sabino R., Arnholdt-Schmitt B. Induction of somatic embryogenesis as an example of stress-related plant reactions. Electron. J. Biotechnol. 2010, 13:1-9.
38. Jiménez V.M. Involvement of plant hormones and plant growth regulators on in vitro somatic embryogenesis. Plant Growth Regul. 2005, 47:91-110.
39. Nishiwaki M., Fujino K., Koda Y., Masuda K., Kikuta Y. Somatic embryogenesis induced by the simple application of abscisic acid to carrot (Daucus carota L.) seedlings in culture. Planta 2000, 211:756-759.
40. Overbeek J.V., Blondeau R., Horne V. Difference in activity between 2,4-dichloro-phenoxyacetic acid and other auxins, and its significance in herbicidal action. Plant Physiol. 1951, 26:687-696.
41. Fehér A. Why somatic plant cells start to form embryos?. Somatic Embryogenesis, Plant Cell Monographs 2005, vol. 2:85-101. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg.
42. Song Y. Insight into the mode of action of 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid (2,4-D) as an herbicide. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2013, 56:106-113.
43. Gliwicka M., Nowak K., Balazadeh S., Mueller-Roeber B., Gaj M.D. Extensive modulation of the transcription factor transcriptome during somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis thaliana. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e69261. 10.1074/jbc.M802129200.
44. Berleth T., Sachs T. Plant morphogenesis: long-distance coordination and local patterning. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2001, 4:57-62.
45. Ikeda-Iwai M., Umehara M., Satoh S., Kamada H. Stress-induced somatic embryogenesis in vegetative tissues of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2003, 34:107-114.
46. Bai B., Su Y.H., Yuan J., Zhang X.S. Induction of somatic embryos in Arabidopsis requires local YUCCA expression mediated by the down-regulation of ethylene biosynthesis. Mol. Plant 2013, 6:1247-1260.
47. Su Y.H., Zhao X.Y., Liu Y.B., Zhang C.L., O'Neill S.D., Zhang X.S. Auxin-induced WUS expression is essential for embryonic stem cell renewal during somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2009, 59:448-460.
48. Nawy T., Lukowitz W., Bayer M. Talk global, act local - patterning the Arabidopsis embryo. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2008, 11:28-33.
49. Potters G., Pasternak T.P., Guisez Y., Palme K.J., Jansen M.A.K. Stress-induced morphogenic responses: growing out of trouble?. Trends Plant Sci. 2007, 12:98-105.
50. Tognetti V.B., Mühlenbock P., Van Breusegem F. Stress homeostasis - the redox and auxin perspective. Plant Cell Environ. 2012, 35:321-333.
51. Pasternak T.P., Prinsen E., Ayaydin F., Potters G., Asard H., Van Onckelen H.A., Fehér A. The role of auxin, Ph, and stress in the activation of embryogenic cell division in leaf protoplast-derived cells of alfalfa. Plant Physiol. 2002, 129:1807-1819.
52. Pasternak T.P., Ötvös K., Domoki M., Fehér A. Linked activation of cell division and oxidative stress defense in alfalfa leaf protoplast-derived cells is dependent on exogenous auxin. Plant Growth Regul. 2007, 51:109-117.
53. Su Y.H., Zhang X.S. The hormonal control of regeneration in plants. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2014, 108:35-69.
54. Zheng Q., Zheng Y., Perry S.E. AGAMOUS-Like15 promotes somatic embryogenesis in Arabidopsis and soybean in part by the control of ethylene biosynthesis and response. Plant Physiol. 2013, 161:2113-2127.
55. Zheng Q., Zheng Y., Perry S.E. Decreased GmAGL15 expression and reduced ethylene synthesis may contribute to reduced somatic embryogenesis in a poorly embryogenic cultivar of Glycine max. Plant Signal. Behav. 2013, 8:8-11.
56. Mantiri F.R., Kurdyukov S., Lohar D.P., Sharopova N., Saeed N.A., Wang X.-D., VandenBosch K.A., Rose R.J. The transcription factor MtSERF1 of the ERF subfamily identified by transcriptional profiling is required for somatic embryogenesis induced by auxin plus cytokinin in Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146:1622-1636.
57. Thakare D., Tang W., Hill K., Perry S.E. The MADS-domain transcriptional regulator AGAMOUS-LIKE15 promotes somatic embryo development in Arabidopsis and soybean. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146:1663-1672.
58. Harding E.W., Tang W., Nichols K.W., Fernandez D.E., Perry S.E. Expression and maintenance of embryogenic potential is enhanced through constitutive expression of AGAMOUS-Like 15. Plant Physiol. 2003, 133:653-663.
59. Zheng Q., Perry S.E. Alterations in the transcriptome of soybean in response to enhanced somatic embryogenesis promoted by orthologs of AGAMOUS-Like15 and AGAMOUS-Like18. Plant Physiol. 2014, 164:1365-1377.
60. Zhu C., Perry S.E. Control of expression and autoregulation of AGL15, a member of the MADS-box family. Plant J. 2005, 41:583-594.
61. Su Y.H., Su Y.X., Liu Y.G., Zhang X.S. Abscisic acid is required for somatic embryo initiation through mediating spatial auxin response in Arabidopsis. Plant Growth Regul. 2012, 69:167-176.
62. Iyer-Pascuzzi A.S., Jackson T., Cui H., Petricka J.J., Busch W., Tsukagoshi H., Benfey P.N. Cell identity regulators link development and stress responses in the Arabidopsis root. Dev. Cell 2011, 21:770-782.
63. Cai S., Fu X., Sheng Z. Dedifferentiation: a new approach in stem cell research. Bioscience 2007, 57:655-662.
64. Grafi G. How cells dedifferentiate: a lesson from plants. Dev. Biol. 2004, 268:1-6.
65. Atta R., Laurens L., Boucheron-Dubuisson E., Guivarc'h A., Carnero E., Giraudat-Pautot V., Rech P., Chriqui D. Pluripotency of Arabidopsis xylem pericycle underlies shoot regeneration from root and hypocotyl explants grown in vitro. Plant J. 2009, 57:626-644.
66. Malamy J.E., Benfey P.N. Organization and cell differentiation in lateral roots of Arabidopsis thaliana. Development 1997, 124:33-44.
67. Laplaze L., Parizot B., Baker A., Ricaud L., Martinière A., Auguy F., Franche C., Nussaume L., Bogusz D., Haseloff J. GAL4-GFP enhancer trap lines for genetic manipulation of lateral root development in Arabidopsis thaliana. J. Exp. Bot. 2005, 56:2433-2442.
68. Che P., Lall S., Howell S.H. Developmental steps in acquiring competence for shoot development in Arabidopsis tissue culture. Planta 2007, 226:1183-1194.
69. He C., Chen X., Huang H., Xu L. Reprogramming of H3K27me3 is critical for acquisition of pluripotency from cultured Arabidopsis tissues. PLoS Genet. 2012, 8:e1002911. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002911.
70. Fan M., Xu C., Xu K., Hu Y. Lateral organ boundaries domain transcription factors direct callus formation in Arabidopsis regeneration. Cell Res. 2012, 22:1169-1180.
71. Chatfield S.P., Capron R., Severino A., Penttila P.-A., Alfred S., Nahal H., Provart N.J. Incipient stem cell niche conversion in tissue culture: using a systems approach to probe early events in WUSCHEL-dependent conversion of lateral root primordia into shoot meristems. Plant J. 2013, 73:798-813.
72. Cocking E.C. Plant cell protoplasts-isolation and development. Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. 1972, 23:29-50.
73. Nagata T., Takebe I. Cell wall regeneration and cell division in isolated tobacco mesophyll protoplasts. Planta 1970, 92:301-308.
74. Bourgin J.-P., Chupeau Y., Missonier C. Plant regeneration from mesophyll protoplasts of several Nicotiana species. Physiol. Plant. 1979, 45:288-292.
75. Wang X.-D., Nolan K.E., Irwanto R.R., Sheahan M.B., Rose R.J. Ontogeny of embryogenic callus in Medicago truncatula: the fate of the pluripotent and totipotent stem cells. Ann. Bot. 2011, 107:599-609.
76. Williams L., Zhao J., Morozova N., Li Y., Avivi Y., Grafi G. Chromatin reorganization accompanying cellular dedifferentiation is associated with modifications of histone H3, redistribution of HP1, and activation of E2F-target genes. Dev. Dyn. 2003, 228:113-120.
77. Iwase A., Ohme-Takagi M., Sugimoto K. WIND1: a key molecular switch for plant cell dedifferentiation. Plant Signal. Behav. 2011, 6:1943-1945.
78. Shigo A.L. Tree health. J. Arboricult. 1982, 8:311-316.
79. Iwase A., Mitsuda N., Koyama T., Hiratsu K., Kojima M., Arai T., Inoue Y., Seki M., Sakakibara H., Sugimoto K., Ohme-Takagi M. The AP2/ERF transcription factor WIND1 controls cell dedifferentiation in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:508-514.
80. Grosset J., Marty I., Chartier Y., Meyer Y. mRNAs newly synthesized by tobacco mesophyll protoplasts are wound-inducible. Plant Mol. Biol. 1990, 15:485-496.
81. Zhao J., Morozova N., Williams L., Libs L., Avivi Y., Grafi G. Two phases of chromatin decondensation during dedifferentiation of plant cells: distinction between competence for cell fate switch and a commitment for S phase. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276:22772-22778.
82. Pasternak T., Miskolczi P., Ayaydin F., Dudits D., Fehér A. Exogenous auxin and cytokinin dependent activation of CDKs and cell division in leaf protoplast-derived cells of alfalfa. Plant Growth Regul. 2000, 32:129-141.
83. Fehér A., Dudits D. Plant protoplasts for cell fusion and direct DNA uptake: culture and regeneration systems. Plant Cell and Tissue Culture 1994, 71-118. Springer Science+Business Media, Dordrecht. I.K. Vasil, T.A. Thorpe (Eds.).
84. Eeckhaut T., Lakshmanan P.S., Deryckere D., Van Bockstaele E., Van Huylenbroeck J. Progress in plant protoplast research. Planta 2013, 991-1003.
85. Jiang F., Zhu J., Liu H.-L. Protoplasts: a useful research system for plant cell biology, especially dedifferentiation. Protoplasma 2013, 250:1231-1238.
86. Chupeau M.-C., Granier F., Pichon O., Renou J.-P., Gaudin V., Chupeau Y. Characterization of the early events leading to totipotency in an Arabidopsis protoplast liquid culture by temporal transcript profiling. Plant Cell 2013, 25:2444-2463.
87. Parizot B., De Rybel B., Beeckman T. VisuaLRTC: a new view on lateral root initiation by combining specific transcriptome data sets. Plant Physiol. 2010, 153:34-40.
88. Verdeil J.-L., Alemanno L., Niemenak N., Tranbarger T.J. Pluripotent versus totipotent plant stem cells: dependence versus autonomy?. Trends Plant Sci. 2007, 12:245-252.
89. Faraco M., Pietro Di Sansebastiano G., Spelt K., Koes R.E., Quattrocchio F.M. One protoplast is not the other!. Plant Physiol. 2011, 156:474-478.
90. Yoo S.-D., Cho Y.-H., Sheen J. Arabidopsis mesophyll protoplasts: a versatile cell system for transient gene expression analysis. Nat. Protoc. 2007, 2:1565-1572.
91. de Vries S.C., Booij H., Meyerink P., Huisman G., Wilde H.D., Thomas T.L., van Kammen A. Acquisition of embryogenic potential in carrot cell-suspension cultures. Planta 1988, 176:196-204.
92. Filonova L.H., Bozhkov P.V., von Arnold S. Developmental pathway of somatic embryogenesis in Picea abies as revealed by time-lapse tracking. J. Exp. Bot. 2000, 51:249-264.
93. Von Arnold S., Sabala I., Bozhkov P., Dyachok J., Filonova L. Developmental pathways of somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2002, 233-249.
94. Bhojwani S.S., Dantu P.K. Somatic embryogenesis. Plant Tissue Culture: An Introductory Text 2013, 75-92. Springer, New Delhi. S.S. Bhojwani, P.K. Dantu (Eds.).
95. Steward F., Mapes M., Mears K. Growth and organized development of cultured cells. II. Organization in cultures grown from freely suspended cells. Am. J. Bot. 1958, 45:705-708.
96. Guzzo F., Baldan B., Mariani P., Lo Schiavo F., Terzi M. Studies on the origin of totipotent cells in explants of Daucus carota L. J. Exp. Bot. 1994, 45:1427-1432.
97. Schmidt E.D., Guzzo F., Toonen M.A., de Vries S.C. A leucine-rich repeat containing receptor-like kinase marks somatic plant cells competent to form embryos. Development 1997, 124:2049-2062.
98. Albrecht C., Russinova E., Hecht V., Baaijens E., De Vries S. The Arabidopsis thaliana SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASES1 and 2 control male sporogenesis. Plant Cell 2005, 17:3337-3349.
99. Steiner N., Santa-Catarina C., Guerra M.P., Cutri L., Dornelas M.C., Floh E.I.S. A gymnosperm homolog of SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASE-1 (SERK1) is expressed during somatic embryogenesis. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2011, 109:41-50.
100. Kwaaitaal M.A.C.J., de Vries S.C. The SERK1 gene is expressed in procambium and immature vascular cells. J. Exp. Bot. 2007, 58:2887-2896.
101. Nolan K.E., Kurdyukov S., Rose R.J. Expression of the SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASE1 (SERK1) gene is associated with developmental change in the life cycle of the model legume Medicago truncatula. J. Exp. Bot. 2009, 60:1759-1771.
102. Santos M.O., Aragão F.J.L. Role of SERK genes in plant environmental response. Plant Signal. Behav. 2009, 4:1111-1113.
103. Tarré E., Magioli C., Margis-Pinheiro M., Sachetto-Martins G., Mansur E., Santiago-Fernandes L.D.R. In vitro somatic embryogenesis and adventitious root initiation have a common origin in eggplant (Solanum melongena L.). Rev. Bras. Bot. 2004, 27:79-84.
104. Gray D.J., Purohit A., Triglano R.N. Somatic embryogenesis and development of synthetic seed technology. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 1991, 10:33-61.
105. Kim T.D., Lee B.S., Kim T.S., Choi Y.E. Developmental plasticity of glandular trichomes into somatic embryogenesis in Tilia amurensis. Ann. Bot. 2007, 100:177-183.
106. Luo Y., Koop H.-U. Somatic embryogenesis in cultured immature zygotic embryos and leaf protoplasts of Arabidopsis thaliana ecotypes. Planta 1997, 202:387-396.
107. Zuo J., Niu Q., Frugis G., Chua N. The WUSCHEL gene promotes vegetative-to-embryonic transition in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2002, 30:349-359.
108. Wang X., Niu Q.-W., Teng C., Li C., Mu J., Chua N.-H., Zou J. Overexpression of PGA37/MYB118 and MYB115 promotes vegetative-to-embryonic transition in Arabidopsis. Cell Res. 2009, 19:224-235.
109. Stone S.L., Kwong L.W., Yee K.M., Pelletier J., Lepiniec L., Fischer R.L., Goldberg R.B., Harada J.J. LEAFY COTYLEDON2 encodes a B3 domain transcription factor that induces embryo development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001, 98:11806-11811.
110. Lotan T., Ohto M., Yee K.M., West M.A., Lo R., Kwong R.W., Yamagishi K., Fischer R.L., Goldberg R.B., Harada J.J. Arabidopsis LEAFY COTYLEDON1 is sufficient to induce embryo development in vegetative cells. Cell 1998, 93:1195-1205.
111. Suzuki M., Wang H.H.-Y., McCarty D.R. Repression of the LEAFY COTYLEDON 1/B3 regulatory network in plant embryo development by VP1/abscisic acid insensitive 3-LIKE B3 genes. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143:902-911.
112. Ogas J., Cheng J.-C., Sung R.Z., Somerville C. Cellular differentiation regulated by gibberellin in the Arabidopsis thaliana pickle mutant. Science 1997, 277:91-94.
113. Hecht V., Vielle-Calzada J.P., Hartog M.V., Schmidt E.D., Boutilier K., Grossniklaus U., de Vries S.C. The Arabidopsis SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR KINASE 1 gene is expressed in developing ovules and embryos and enhances embryogenic competence in culture. Plant Physiol. 2001, 127:803-816.
114. Boutilier K., Offringa R., Sharma V.K., Kieft H., Ouellet T., Zhang L., Hattori J., Liu C., Van Lammeren A.A.M., Miki B.L.A., Custers J.B.M., Van Lookeren Campagne M.M. Ectopic expression of BABY BOOM triggers a conversion from vegetative to embryonic growth. Plant Cell 2002, 14:1737-1749.
115. Damri M., Granot G., Ben-Meir H., Avivi Y., Plaschkes I., Chalifa-Caspi V., Wolfson M., Fraifeld V., Grafi G. Senescing cells share common features with dedifferentiating cells. Rejuvenation Res. 2009, 12:435-443.
116. Grafi G., Chalifa-Caspi V., Nagar T., Plaschkes I., Barak S., Ransbotyn V. Plant response to stress meets dedifferentiation. Planta 2011, 233:433-438.
117. Seydoux G., Braun R.E. Pathway to totipotency: lessons from germ cells. Cell 2006, 127:891-904.
118. Cinalli R.M., Rangan P., Lehmann R. Germ cells are forever. Cell 2008, 132:559-562.
119. Walbot V., Evans M.M.S. Unique features of the plant life cycle and their consequences. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2003, 4:369-379.
120. Sundaresan V., Alandete-Saez M. Pattern formation in miniature: the female gametophyte of flowering plants. Development 2010, 137:179-189.
121. Borg M., Twell D. Life after meiosis: patterning the angiosperm male gametophyte. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2010, 38:577-582.
122. Feng X., Zilberman D., Dickinson H. A conversation across generations: soma-germ cell crosstalk in plants. Dev. Cell 2013, 24:215-225.
123. Yang W.-C., Shi D.-Q., Chen Y.-H. Female gametophyte development in flowering plants. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2010, 61:89-108.
124. Twell D. Male gametogenesis and germline specification in flowering plants. Sex. Plant Reprod. 2011, 24:149-160.
125. Singh M.B., Bhalla P.L. Control of male germ-cell development in flowering plants. Bioessays 2007, 29:1124-1132.
126. Sena G., Wang X., Liu H.-Y., Hofhuis H., Birnbaum K.D. Organ regeneration does not require a functional stem cell niche in plants. Nature 2009, 457:1150-1153.
127. Ikeda-Iwai M. Establishment of a reproducible tissue culture system for the induction of Arabidopsis somatic embryos. J. Exp. Bot. 2002, 53:1575-1580.
128. Gaj M.D. Direct somatic embryogenesis as a rapid and efficient system for in vitro regeneration of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2001, 64:39-46.
129. Kumlehn J., Kirik V., Czihal A., Altschmied L., Matzk F., Lörz H., Bäumlein H. Parthenogenetic egg cells of wheat: cellular and molecular studies. Sex. Plant Reprod. 2001, 14:239-243.
130. Supena E.D.J., Winarto B., Riksen T., Dubas E., van Lammeren A., Offringa R., Boutilier K., Custers J. Regeneration of zygotic-like microspore-derived embryos suggests an important role for the suspensor in early embryo patterning. J. Exp. Bot. 2008, 59:803-814.
131. Ogas J., Kaufmann S., Henderson J., Somerville C. PICKLE is a CHD3 chromatin-remodeling factor that regulates the transition from embryonic to vegetative development in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999, 96:13839-13844.
132. Tanaka M., Kikuchi A., Kamada H. The Arabidopsis histone deacetylases HDA6 and HDA19 contribute to the repression of embryonic properties after germination. Plant Physiol. 2008, 146:149-161.
133. Koszegi D., Johnston A.J., Rutten T., Czihal A., Altschmied L., Kumlehn J., Wüst S.E.J., Kirioukhova O., Gheyselinck J., Grossniklaus U., Bäumlein H. Members of the RKD transcription factor family induce an egg cell-like gene expression program. Plant J. 2011, 67:280-291.
134. Koltunow A. Apomixis 2012, Wiley & Sons, Ltd., Chichester. 10.1002/9780470015902.a0002035.pub2.
135. Prem D., Solís M.-T., Bárány I., Rodríguez-Sanz H., Risueño M.C., Testillano P.S. A new microspore embryogenesis system under low temperature which mimics zygotic embryogenesis initials, expresses auxin and efficiently regenerates doubled-haploid plants in Brassica napus. BMC Plant Biol. 2012, 12:127.
136. Dubas E., Custers J., Kieft H., Wedzony M., van Lammeren A.A.M. Characterization of polarity development through 2- and 3-D imaging during the initial phase of microspore embryogenesis in Brassica napus L. Protoplasma 2014, 251:103-113.
137. Jeong S., Palmer T.M., Lukowitz W. The RWP-RK factor GROUNDED promotes embryonic polarity by facilitating YODA MAP kinase signaling. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:1268-1276.
138. Waki T., Hiki T., Watanabe R., Hashimoto T., Nakajima K. The Arabidopsis RWP-RK protein RKD4 triggers gene expression and pattern formation in early embryogenesis. Curr. Biol. 2011, 21:1277-1281.
139. Yadav R.K., Perales M., Gruel J., Girke T., Jönsson H., Reddy G.V. WUSCHEL protein movement mediates stem cell homeostasis in the Arabidopsis shoot apex. Genes Dev. 2011, 25:2025-2030.
140. Schoof H., Lenhard M., Haecker A., Mayer K.F., Jürgens G., Laux T. The stem cell population of Arabidopsis shoot meristems is maintained by a regulatory loop between the CLAVATA and WUSCHEL genes. Cell 2000, 100:635-644.
141. Mordhorst A.P., Hartog M.V., El Tamer M.K., Laux T., de Vries S.C. Somatic embryogenesis from Arabidopsis shoot apical meristem mutants. Planta 2002, 214:829-836.
142. Wang Y., Wang J., Shi B., Yu T., Qi J., Meyerowitz E.M., Jiao Y. The stem cell niche in leaf axils is established by auxin and cytokinin in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2014, 26:2055-2067.
143. Wang Q., Kohlen W., Rossmann S., Vernoux T., Theres K. Auxin depletion from the leaf axil conditions competence for axillary meristem formation in Arabidopsis and tomato. Plant Cell 2014, 26:2068-2079.
144. Gordon S.P., Chickarmane V.S., Ohno C., Meyerowitz E.M. Multiple feedback loops through cytokinin signaling control stem cell number within the Arabidopsis shoot meristem. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2009, 106:16529-16534.
145. Elhiti M., Tahir M., Gulden R.H., Khamiss K., Stasolla C. Modulation of embryo-forming capacity in culture through the expression of Brassica genes involved in the regulation of the shoot apical meristem. J. Exp. Bot. 2010, 61:4069-4085.
146. Braybrook S.A., Harada J.J. LECs go crazy in embryo development. Trends Plant Sci. 2008, 13:624-630.
147. Harada J.J. Role of Arabidopsis LEAFY COTYLEDON genes in seed development. J. Plant Physiol. 2001, 158:405-409.
148. Rider S.D., Henderson J. Coordinate repression of regulators of embryonic identity by PICKLE during germination in Arabidopsis. Plant J. 2003, 35:33-43.
149. Gaj M.D., Zhang S., Harada J.J., Lemaux P.G. Leafy cotyledon genes are essential for induction of somatic embryogenesis of Arabidopsis. Planta 2005, 222:977-988.
150. Le B.H., Cheng C., Bui A.Q., Wagmaister J.A., Henry K.F., Pelletier J., Kwong L., Belmonte M., Kirkbride R., Horvath S., Drews G.N., Fischer R.L., Okamuro J.K., Harada J.J., Goldberg R.B. Global analysis of gene activity during Arabidopsis seed development and identification of seed-specific transcription factors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107:8063-8070.
151. Junker A., Mönke G., Rutten T., Keilwagen J., Seifert M., Thi T.M.N., Renou J.-P., Balzergue S., Viehöver P., Hähnel U., Ludwig-Müller J., Altschmied L., Conrad U., Weisshaar B., Bäumlein H. Elongation-related functions of LEAFY COTYLEDON1 during the development of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant J. 2012, 71:427-442.
152. Casson S.A., Lindsey K. The turnip mutant of Arabidopsis reveals that LEAFY COTYLEDON1 expression mediates the effects of auxin and sugars to promote embryonic cell identity. Plant Physiol. 2006, 142:526-541.
153. Junker A., Bäumlein H. Multifunctionality of the LEC1 transcription factor during plant development. Plant Signal. Behav. 2012, 7:1718-1720.
154. Stone S.L., Braybrook S.A., Paula S.L., Kwong L.W., Meuser J., Pelletier J., Hsieh T.-F., Fischer R.L., Goldberg R.B., Harada J.J. Arabidopsis LEAFY COTYLEDON2 induces maturation traits and auxin activity: implications for somatic embryogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:3151-3156.
155. Dubreucq B., Baud S., Debeaujon I., Dubos C., Marion-Poll A., Miquel M., North H., Rochat C., Routaboul J.-M., Lepiniec L. Seed development. Plant Developmental Biology - Biotechnological Perspectives 2010, 341-359. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. E.C. Pua, M.R. Davey (Eds.).
156. Lohe A.R., Chaudhury A. Genetic and epigenetic processes in seed development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2002, 5:19-25.
157. Henderson J.T., Li H.-C., Rider S.D., Mordhorst A.P., Romero-Severson J., Cheng J.-C., Robey J., Sung R.Z., de Vries S.C., Ogas J. PICKLE acts throughout the plant to repress expression of embryonic traits and may play a role in gibberellin-dependent responses. Plant Physiol. 2004, 134:995-1005.
158. Wagner D. Chromatin regulation of plant development. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2003, 6:20-28.
159. Sahu P.P., Pandey G., Sharma N., Puranik S., Muthamilarasan M., Prasad M. Epigenetic mechanisms of plant stress responses and adaptation. Plant Cell Rep. 2013, 32:1151-1159.
160. Yuan L., Liu X., Luo M., Yang S., Wu K. Involvement of histone modifications in plant abiotic stress responses. J. Integr. Plant Biol. 2013, 55:892-901.
161. Van Zanten M., Tessadori F., Peeters A.J.M., Fransz P. Environment-induced chromatin reorganisation and plant acclimation. Epigenetic Memory and Control in Plants 2013, 21-40. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. G. Grafi, N. Ohad (Eds.).
162. Luo M., Liu X., Singh P., Cui Y., Zimmerli L., Wu K. Chromatin modifications and remodeling in plant abiotic stress responses. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2012, 1819:129-136.
163. Smith K.T., Workman J.L. Chromatin proteins: key responders to stress. PLoS Biol. 2012, 10:e1001371. 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001371.
164. Gutzat R., Mittelsten Scheid O. Epigenetic responses to stress: triple defense?. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2012, 15:568-573.
165. Pikaard C.S., Scheid O.M. Epigenetic regulation in plants. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 2013, 6:a019315.
166. Lauria M., Rossi V. Epigenetic control of gene regulation in plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2011, 1809:369-378.
167. Feng S., Jacobsen S.E. Epigenetic modifications in plants: an evolutionary perspective. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2011, 14:179-186.
168. Jones A.L., Sung S. Mechanisms underlying epigenetic regulation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Integr. Comp. Biol. 2014, 1-7.
169. Zhang M., Kimatu J.N., Xu K., Liu B. DNA cytosine methylation in plant development. J. Genet. Genomics 2010, 37:1-12.
170. Zhang X., Jacobsen S.E. Genetic analyses of DNA methyltransferases in Arabidopsis thaliana. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. Quant. Biol. 2006, 71:439-447.
171. Zhang X., Yazaki J., Sundaresan A., Cokus S., Chan S.W.-L., Chen H., Henderson I.R., Shinn P., Pellegrini M., Jacobsen S.E., Ecker J.R. Genome-wide high-resolution mapping and functional analysis of DNA methylation in Arabidopsis. Cell 2006, 126:1189-1201.
172. Slotkin R.K., Martienssen R. Transposable elements and the epigenetic regulation of the genome. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2007, 8:272-285.
173. Chan S.W.-L., Henderson I.R., Jacobsen S.E. Gardening the genome: DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat. Rev. Genet. 2005, 6:351-360.
174. Avivi Y., Morad V., Ben-Meir H., Zhao J., Kashkush K., Tzfira T., Citovsky V., Grafi G. Reorganization of specific chromosomal domains and activation of silent genes in plant cells acquiring pluripotentiality. Dev. Dyn. 2004, 230:12-22.
175. Moricová P., Ondřej V., Navrátilová B., Luhová L. Changes of DNA methylation and hydroxymethylation in plant protoplast cultures. Acta Biochim. Pol. 2013, 60:33-36.
176. Koukalova B., Fojtova M., Lim K.Y., Fulnecek J., Leitch A.R., Kovarik A. Dedifferentiation of tobacco cells is associated with ribosomal RNA gene hypomethylation, increased transcription, and chromatin alterations. Plant Physiol. 2005, 139:275-286.
177. Tanurdzic M., Vaughn M.W., Jiang H., Lee T.-J., Slotkin R.K., Sosinski B., Thompson W.F., Doerge R.W., Martienssen R.A. Epigenomic consequences of immortalized plant cell suspension culture. PLoS Biol. 2008, 6:2880-2895. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0060302.
178. Berdasco M., Alcázar R., García-Ortiz M.V., Ballestar E., Fernández A.F., Roldán-Arjona T., Tiburcio A.F., Altabella T., Buisine N., Quesneville H., Baudry A., Lepiniec L., Alaminos M., Rodríguez R., Lloyd A., Colot V., Bender J., Canal M.J., Esteller M., Fraga M.F. Promoter DNA hypermethylation and gene repression in undifferentiated Arabidopsis cells. PLoS ONE 2008, 3:e3306. 10.1371/journal.pone.0003306.
179. Li W., Liu H., Cheng Z.J., Su Y.H., Han H.N., Zhang Y., Zhang X.S. DNA methylation and histone modifications regulate de novo shoot regeneration in Arabidopsis by modulating WUSCHEL expression and auxin signaling. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7:e1002243. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002243.
180. Vining K., Pomraning K.R., Wilhelm L.J., Ma C., Pellegrini M., Di Y., Mockler T.C., Freitag M., Strauss S.H. Methylome reorganization during in vitro dedifferentiation and regeneration of Populus trichocarpa. BMC Plant Biol. 2013, 13:92.
181. Wada Y., Miyamoto K., Kusano T., Sano H. Association between up-regulation of stress-responsive genes and hypomethylation of genomic DNA in tobacco plants. Mol. Genet. Genomics 2004, 271:658-666.
182. Boyko A., Kovalchuk I. Epigenetic control of plant stress response. Environ. Mol. Mutagen. 2008, 49:61-72.
183. Dowen R.H., Pelizzola M., Schmitz R.J., Lister R., Dowen J.M., Nery J.R., Dixon J.E., Ecker J.R. Widespread dynamic DNA methylation in response to biotic stress. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2012, 109:83-91.
184. Kim J.-M., To T.K., Nishioka T., Seki M. Chromatin regulation functions in plant abiotic stress responses. Plant Cell Environ. 2010, 33:604-611.
185. Boyko A., Kovalchuk I. Epigenetic regulation of genome stability in plants in response to stress. Epigenetic Memory and Control in Plants 2013, 41-56. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg. G. Grafi, N. Ohad (Eds.).
186. Yaish M.W., Colasanti J., Rothstein S.J. The role of epigenetic processes in controlling flowering time in plants exposed to stress. J. Exp. Bot. 2011, 62:3727-3735.
187. Henderson I.R., Dean C. Control of Arabidopsis flowering: the chill before the bloom. Development 2004, 131:3829-3838.
188. Finnegan E.J., Genger R.K., Kovac K., Peacock W.J., Dennis E.S. DNA methylation and the promotion of flowering by vernalization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1998, 95:5824-5829.
189. Xiao W., Custard K., Brown R. DNA methylation is critical for Arabidopsis embryogenesis and seed viability. Plant Cell 2006, 18:805-814.
190. Loschiavo F., Pitto L., Giuliano G., Torti G., Nuti-Ronchi V., Marazziti D., Vergara R., Orselli S., Terzi M. DNA methylation of embryogenic carrot cell cultures and its variations as caused by mutation, differentiation, hormones and hypomethylating drugs. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1989, 77:325-331.
191. Yamamoto N., Kobayashi H., Togashi T., Mori Y., Kikuchi K., Kuriyama K., Tokuji Y. Formation of embryogenic cell clumps from carrot epidermal cells is suppressed by 5-azacytidine, a DNA methylation inhibitor. J. Plant Physiol. 2005, 162:47-54.
192. Santos D., Fevereiro P. Loss of DNA methylation affects somatic embryogenesis in Medicago truncatula. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2002, 70:155-161.
193. Yujin H., Xiuxin D. Stress treatments and DNA methylation affected the somatic embryogenesis of citrus callus. Acta Bot. Sin. 2002, 44:673-677.
194. Chakrabarty D., Yu K.W., Paek K.Y. Detection of DNA methylation changes during somatic embryogenesis of Siberian ginseng (Eleuterococcus senticosus). Plant Sci. 2003, 165:61-68.
195. Noceda C., Salaj T., Pérez M., Viejo M., Cañal M.J., Salaj J., Rodriguez R. DNA demethylation and decrease on free polyamines is associated with the embryogenic capacity of Pinus nigra Arn. cell culture. Trees 2009, 23:1285-1293.
196. Messeguer R., Ganal M.W., Steffens J.C., Tanksley S.D. Characterization of the level, target sites and inheritance of cytosine methylation in tomato nuclear DNA. Plant Mol. Biol. 1991, 16:753-770.
197. Yuan J.-L., Sun H.-M., Guo G.-P., Yue J.-J., Gu X.-P. Correlation between DNA methylation and chronological age of Moso bamboo (Phyllostachys heterocycla var. pubescens). Bot. Stud. 2014, 55:4.
198. Baurens F.-C., Nicolleau J., Legavre T., Verdeil J.-L., Monteuuis O. Genomic DNA methylation of juvenile and mature Acacia mangium micropropagated in vitro with reference to leaf morphology as a phase change marker. Tree Physiol. 2004, 24:401-407.
199. Nakano Y., Steward N., Sekine M., Kusano T., Sano H. A tobacco NtMET1 cDNA encoding a DNA methyltransferase: molecular characterization and abnormal phenotypes of transgenic tobacco plants. Plant Cell Physiol. 2000, 41:448-457.
200. Finnegan E.J., Peacock W.J., Dennis E.S. Reduced DNA methylation in Arabidopsis thaliana results in abnormal plant development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1996, 93:8449-8454.
201. Soppe W.J.J., Jasencakova Z., Houben A., Kakutani T., Meister A., Huang M.S., Jacobsen S.E., Schubert I., Fransz P.F. DNA methylation controls histone H3 lysine 9 methylation and heterochromatin assembly in Arabidopsis. EMBO J. 2002, 21:6549-6559.
202. Pfluger J., Wagner D. Histone modifications and dynamic regulation of genome accessibility in plants. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2007, 10:645-652.
203. Graessle S., Loidl P., Brosch G. Histone acetylation: plants and fungi as model systems for the investigation of histone deacetylases. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2001, 58:704-720.
204. Li Y., Butenko Y., Grafi G. Histone deacetylation is required for progression through mitosis in tobacco cells. Plant J. 2005, 41:346-352.
205. Sieberer T., Hauser M., Seifert G., Luschnig C. PROPORZ1, a putative Arabidopsis transcriptional adaptor protein, mediates auxin and cytokinin signals in the control of cell proliferation. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13:837-842.
206. Vlachonasios K.E., Thomashow M.F., Triezenberg S.J. Disruption mutations of ADA2b and GCN5 transcriptional adaptor genes dramatically affect Arabidopsis growth, development, and gene expression. Plant Cell 2003, 15:626-638.
207. Anzola J.M., Sieberer T., Ortbauer M., Butt H., Korbei B., Weinhofer I., Müllner A.E., Luschnig C. Putative Arabidopsis transcriptional adaptor protein (PROPORZ1) is required to modulate histone acetylation in response to auxin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2010, 107:10308-10313.
208. Manzano C., Ramirez-Parra E., Casimiro I., Otero S., Desvoyes B., De Rybel B., Beeckman T., Casero P., Gutierrez C., Del Pozo J. Auxin and epigenetic regulation of SKP2B, an F-box that represses lateral root formation. Plant Physiol. 2012, 160:749-762.
209. Mao Y., Pavangadkar K.A., Thomashow M.F., Triezenberg S.J. Physical and functional interactions of Arabidopsis ADA2 transcriptional coactivator proteins with the acetyltransferase GCN5 and with the cold-induced transcription factor CBF1. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2006, 1759:69-79.
210. Szemenyei H., Hannon M., Long J.A. TOPLESS mediates auxin-dependent transcriptional repression during Arabidopsis embryogenesis. Science 2008, 319:1384-1386.
211. Long J.A., Ohno C., Smith Z.R., Meyerowitz E.M. TOPLESS regulates apical embryonic fate in Arabidopsis. Science 2006, 312:1520-1523.
212. Causier B., Ashworth M., Guo W., Davies B. The TOPLESS interactome: a framework for gene repression in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2012, 158:423-438.
213. Leibfried A., To J.P.C., Busch W., Stehling S., Kehle A., Demar M., Kieber J.J., Lohmann J.U. WUSCHEL controls meristem function by direct regulation of cytokinin-inducible response regulators. Nature 2005, 438:1172-1175.
214. Kieffer M., Stern Y., Cook H., Clerici E., Maulbetsch C., Laux T., Davies B. Analysis of the transcription factor WUSCHEL and its functional homologue in Antirrhinum reveals a potential mechanism for their roles in meristem maintenance. Plant Cell 2006, 18:560-573.
215. Busch W., Miotk A., Ariel F.D., Zhao Z., Forner J., Daum G., Suzaki T., Schuster C., Schultheiss S.J., Leibfried A., Haubeiss S., Ha N., Chan R.L., Lohmann J.U. Transcriptional control of a plant stem cell niche. Dev. Cell 2010, 18:849-861.
216. Bertrand C., Bergounioux C., Domenichini S., Delarue M., Zhou D.-X. Arabidopsis histone acetyltransferase AtGCN5 regulates the floral meristem activity through the WUSCHEL/AGAMOUS pathway. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278:28246-28251.
217. Han P., Li Q., Zhu Y.-X. Mutation of Arabidopsis BARD1 causes meristem defects by failing to confine WUSCHEL expression to the organizing center. Plant Cell 2008, 20:1482-1493.
218. Deng W., Liu C., Pei Y., Deng X., Niu L., Cao X. Involvement of the histone acetyltransferase AtHAC1 in the regulation of flowering time via repression of FLOWERING LOCUS C in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol. 2007, 143:1660-1668.
219. Uddenberg D., Valladares S., Abrahamsson M., Sundström J.F., Sundås-Larsson A., von Arnold S. Embryogenic potential and expression of embryogenesis-related genes in conifers are affected by treatment with a histone deacetylase inhibitor. Planta 2011, 234:527-539.
220. Li H., Soriano M., Cordewener J., Muiño J.M., Riksen T., Fukuoka H., Angenent G.C., Boutilier K. The histone deacetylase inhibitor trichostatin a promotes totipotency in the male gametophyte. Plant Cell 2014, 26:195-209.
221. Zhou Y., Tan B., Luo M., Li Y., Liu C., Chen C., Yu C.-W., Yang S., Dong S., Ruan J., Yuan L., Zhang Z., Zhao L., Li C., Chen H., Cui Y., Wu K., Huang S. HISTONE DEACETYLASE19 interacts with HSL1 and participates in the repression of seed maturation genes in Arabidopsis seedlings. Plant Cell 2013, 25:134-148.
222. Zhou C., Labbe H., Sridha S., Wang L., Tian L., Latoszek-Green M., Yang Z., Brown D., Miki B., Wu K. Expression and function of HD2-type histone deacetylases in Arabidopsis development. Plant J. 2004, 38:715-724.
223. Kim J.-M., To T.K., Seki M. An epigenetic integrator: new insights into genome regulation, environmental stress responses and developmental controls by histone deacetylase 6. Plant Cell Physiol. 2012, 53:794-800.
224. Wu K., Malik K., Tian L., Brown D., Miki B. Functional analysis of a RPD3 histone deacetylase homologue in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Mol. Biol. 2000, 44:167-176.
225. Tian L., Chen Z.J. Blocking histone deacetylation in Arabidopsis induces pleiotropic effects on plant gene regulation and development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2001, 98:200-205.
226. Tian L., Wang J., Fong M.P., Chen M., Cao H., Gelvin S.B., Chen Z.J. Genetic control of developmental changes induced by disruption of Arabidopsis histone deacetylase 1 (AtHD1) expression. Genetics 2003, 165:399-409.
227. Zhou C., Zhang L., Duan J., Miki B., Wu K. HISTONE DEACETYLASE19 is involved in jasmonic acid and ethylene signaling of pathogen response in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell 2005, 17:1196-1204.
228. Ay N., Janack B., Humbeck K. Epigenetic control of plant senescence and linked processes. J. Exp. Bot. 2014, (Epub ahead of print). 10.1093/jxb/eru132.
229. Sang Y., Wu M.-F., Wagner D. The stem cell-chromatin connection. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2009, 20:1143-1148.
230. Köhler C., Hennig L. Regulation of cell identity by plant Polycomb and trithorax group proteins. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2010, 20:541-547.
231. Kim D.-H., Sung S. Environmentally coordinated epigenetic silencing of FLC by protein and long noncoding RNA components. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2012, 15:51-56.
232. Bouyer D., Roudier F., Heese M., Andersen E.D., Gey D., Nowack M.K., Goodrich J., Renou J.P., Grini P.E., Colot V., Schnittger A. Polycomb repressive complex 2 controls the embryo-to-seedling phase transition. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7:e1002014. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1002014.
233. Gentry M., Hennig L. Remodelling chromatin to shape development of plants. Exp. Cell Res. 2014, 321:40-46.
234. Makarevich G., Leroy O., Akinci U., Schubert D., Clarenz O., Goodrich J., Grossniklaus U., Köhler C. Different Polycomb group complexes regulate common target genes in Arabidopsis. EMBO Rep. 2006, 7:947-952.
235. Zhang X., Clarenz O., Cokus S., Bernatavichute Y.V., Pellegrini M., Goodrich J., Jacobsen S.E. Whole-genome analysis of histone H3 lysine 27 trimethylation in Arabidopsis. PLoS Biol. 2007, 5:e129. 10.1371/journal.pbio.0050129.
236. Chanvivattana Y., Bishopp A., Schubert D., Stock C., Moon Y.-H., Sung Z.R., Goodrich J. Interaction of Polycomb-group proteins controlling flowering in Arabidopsis. Development 2004, 131:5263-5276.
237. Gu X., Xu T., He Y. A histone H3 lysine-27 methyltransferase complex represses lateral root formation in Arabidopsis thaliana. Mol. Plant 2014, 7:977-988.
238. Grafi G., Ben-Meir H., Avivi Y., Moshe M., Dahan Y., Zemach A. Histone methylation controls telomerase-independent telomere lengthening in cells undergoing dedifferentiation. Dev. Biol. 2007, 306:838-846.
239. Lu F., Cui X., Zhang S., Jenuwein T., Cao X. Arabidopsis REF6 is a histone H3 lysine 27 demethylase. Nat. Genet. 2011, 43:715-719.
240. Bernstein B.E., Mikkelsen T.S., Xie X., Kamal M., Huebert D.J., Cuff J., Fry B., Meissner A., Wernig M., Plath K., Jaenisch R., Wagschal A., Feil R., Schreiber S.L., Lander E.S. A bivalent chromatin structure marks key developmental genes in embryonic stem cells. Cell 2006, 125:315-326.
241. Schatlowski N., Creasey K., Goodrich J., Schubert D. Keeping plants in shape: Polycomb-group genes and histone methylation. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2008, 19:547-553.
242. Su S., Zhang M., Li L., Wu M. Polycomb group genes as the key regulators in gene silencing, Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci. 2014, 19:1-7.
243. Calonje M. PRC1 marks the difference in plant PcG repression. Mol. Plant 2013, 7:459-471.
244. Bratzel F., López-Torrejón G., Koch M., Del Pozo J.C., Calonje M. Keeping cell identity in Arabidopsis requires PRC1 RING-finger homologs that catalyze H2A monoubiquitination. Curr. Biol. 2010, 20:1853-1859.
245. Yang C., Bratzel F., Hohmann N., Koch M., Turck F., Calonje M. VAL- and AtBMI1-mediated H2Aub initiate the switch from embryonic to postgerminative growth in Arabidopsis. Curr. Biol. 2013, 23:1324-1329.
246. Blackledge N.P., Farcas A.M., Kondo T., King H.W., McGouran J.F., Hanssen L.L.P., Ito S., Cooper S., Kondo K., Koseki Y., Ishikura T., Long H.K., Sheahan T.W., Brockdorff N., Kessler B.M., Koseki H., Klose R.J. Variant PRC1 complex-dependent H2A ubiquitylation drives PRC2 recruitment and Polycomb domain formation. Cell 2014, 157:1445-1459.
247. Kalb R., Latwiel S., Baymaz H.I., Jansen P.W.T.C., Müller C.W., Vermeulen M., Müller J. Histone H2A monoubiquitination promotes histone H3 methylation in Polycomb repression. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2014, 21:569-571.
248. Chen D., Molitor A., Liu C., Shen W.-H. The Arabidopsis PRC1-like ring-finger proteins are necessary for repression of embryonic traits during vegetative growth. Cell Res. 2010, 20:1332-1344.
249. Feng J., Shen W.-H. Dynamic regulation and function of histone monoubiquitination in plants. Front. Plant Sci. 2014, 5:83. 10.3389/fpls.2014.00083.
250. Aichinger E., Villar C.B.R., Farrona S., Reyes J.C., Hennig L., Köhler C. CHD3 proteins and Polycomb group proteins antagonistically determine cell identity in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000605. 10.1371/journal.pgen.1000605.
251. Clapier C.R., Cairns B.R. Chromatin remodeling complexes. Fundamentals of Chromatin 2014, 69-146. Springer, New York, NY. J.L. Workman, S.M. Abmayr (Eds.).
252. Kwon C.S., Chen C., Wagner D. WUSCHEL is a primary target for transcriptional regulation by SPLAYED in dynamic control of stem cell fate in Arabidopsis. Genes Dev. 2005, 19:992-1003.
253. Ho K.K., Zhang H., Golden B.L., Ogas J. PICKLE is a CHD subfamily II ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factor. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2013, 1829:199-210.
254. Zhang H., Rider S.D., Henderson J.T., Fountain M., Chuang K., Kandachar V., Simons A., Edenberg H.J., Romero-Severson J., Muir W.M., Ogas J. The CHD3 remodeler PICKLE promotes trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:22637-22648.
255. Zhang H., Bishop B., Ringenberg W., Muir W.M., Ogas J. The CHD3 remodeler PICKLE associates with genes enriched for trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159:418-432.
256. Aichinger E., Villar C.B.R., Di Mambro R., Sabatini S., Köhler C. The CHD3 chromatin remodeler PICKLE and Polycomb group proteins antagonistically regulate meristem activity in the Arabidopsis root. Plant Cell 2011, 23:1047-1060.
257. Pullman G.S., Mein J., Johnson S., Zhang Y. Gibberellin inhibitors improve embryogenic tissue initiation in conifers. Plant Cell Rep. 2005, 23:596-605.
258. Fukaki H., Taniguchi N., Tasaka M. PICKLE is required for SOLITARY-ROOT/IAA14-mediated repression of ARF7 and ARF19 activity during Arabidopsis lateral root initiation. Plant J. 2006, 48:380-389.
259. Zheng Y., Ren N., Wang H., Stromberg A.J., Perry S.E. Global identification of targets of the Arabidopsis MADS domain protein AGAMOUS-Like15. Plant Cell 2009, 21:2563-2577.
260. Wang H., Caruso L.V., Downie A.B., Perry S.E. The embryo MADS domain protein AGAMOUS-Like 15 directly regulates expression of a gene encoding an enzyme involved in gibberellin metabolism. Plant Cell 2004, 16:1206-1219.
261. Braybrook S.A., Stone S.L., Park S., Bui A.Q., Le B.H., Fischer R.L., Goldberg R.B., Harada J.J. Genes directly regulated by LEAFY COTYLEDON2 provide insight into the control of embryo maturation and somatic embryogenesis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2006, 103:3468-3473.
262. Kagaya Y., Okuda R., Ban A., Toyoshima R., Tsutsumida K., Usui H., Yamamoto A., Hattori T. Indirect ABA-dependent regulation of seed storage protein genes by FUSCA3 transcription factor in Arabidopsis. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005, 46:300-311.
263. Kagaya Y., Toyoshima R., Okuda R., Usui H., Yamamoto A., Hattori T. LEAFY COTYLEDON1 controls seed storage protein genes through its regulation of FUSCA3 and ABSCISIC ACID INSENSITIVE3. Plant Cell Physiol. 2005, 46:399-406.
264. Gazzarrini S., Tsuchiya Y., Lumba S., Okamoto M., McCourt P. The transcription factor FUSCA3 controls developmental timing in Arabidopsis through the hormones gibberellin and abscisic acid. Dev. Cell 2004, 7:373-385.
265. Nolan K.E., Song Y., Liao S., Saeed N.A., Zhang X., Rose R.J. An unusual abscisic acid and gibberellic acid synergism increases somatic embryogenesis, facilitates its genetic analysis and improves transformation in Medicago truncatula. PLoS ONE 2014, 9:e99908.
266. Vaahtera L., Brosché M. More than the sum of its parts - how to achieve a specific transcriptional response to abiotic stress. Plant Sci. 2011, 180:421-430.
267. Kim S., Lee J., Yang J.-Y., Jung C., Chua N.-H. Arabidopsis histone methyltransferase SET DOMAIN GROUP2 is required for regulation of various hormone responsive genes. J. Plant Biol. 2013, 56:39-48.
268. Retzer K., Butt H., Korbei B., Luschnig C. The far side of auxin signaling: fundamental cellular activities and their contribution to a defined growth response in plants. Protoplasma 2014, 251:731-746.
269. Latzel V., Zhang Y., Karlsson Moritz K., Fischer M., Bossdorf O. Epigenetic variation in plant responses to defence hormones. Ann. Bot. 2012, 110:1423-1428.
270. Donà M., Macovei A., Faè M., Carbonera D., Balestrazzi A. Plant hormone signaling and modulation of DNA repair under stressful conditions. Plant Cell Rep. 2013, 32:1043-1052.
271. Zhang H., Ogas J. An epigenetic perspective on developmental regulation of seed genes. Mol. Plant 2009, 2:610-627.
272. Bairu M.W., Aremu A.O., Staden J. Somaclonal variation in plants: causes and detection methods. Plant Growth Regul. 2010, 63:147-173.
273. Larkin P.J., Scowcroft W.R. Somaclonal variation - a novel source of variability from cell cultures for plant improvement. Theor. Appl. Genet. 1981, 60:197-214.
274. Skirvin R., McPheeters K., Norton M. Sources and frequency of somaclonal variation. HortSci. 1994, 29:1232-1237.
275. McClintock B. The significance of responses of the genome to challenge. Science 1984, 226:792-801.
276. Phillips R.L.L., Kaeppler S.M.M., Olhoft P. Genetic instability of plant tissue cultures: breakdown of normal controls. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1994, 91:5222-5226.
277. Boyko A., Kovalchuk I. Genome instability and epigenetic modification-heritable responses to environmental stress?. Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 2011, 14:260-266.
278. Bradshaw A.D., Hardwick K. Evolution and stress-genotypic and phenotypic components. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 1989, 37:137-155.
279. Neelakandan A.K., Wang K. Recent progress in the understanding of tissue culture-induced genome level changes in plants and potential applications. Plant Cell Rep. 2012, 31:597-620.
280. Us-Camas R., Rivera-Solís G., Duarte-Aké F., De-la-Peña C. In vitro culture: an epigenetic challenge for plants. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2014, (Epub ahead of print). 10.1007/s11240-014-0482-8.