Ontogeny of embryogenic callus in Medicago truncatula: The fate of the pluripotent and totipotent stem cells

Annals of Botany

Volumn 107, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 599-609

  Wang, Xin Ding ^a   Nolan, Kim E ^a   Irwanto, Rina R ^a,b   Sheahan, Michael B ^a   Rose, Ray J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEWCASTLE   (Australia)

^b BANDUNG INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Indonesia)

Author keywords

Callus; dedifferentiation; leaf veins; Medicago truncatula; pluripotency; procambium; protoplasts; reactive oxygen species; SERK; somatic embryogenesis; stem cells; totipotency

Indexed keywords

CYTOKININ; INDOLEACETIC ACID DERIVATIVE;

CELL ORGANELLE; ECOLOGICAL MODELING; EMBRYO; GENE EXPRESSION; GENOTYPE; LEGUME; ONTOGENY; OXYGEN; STEM;

ARTICLE; BARREL MEDIC; CELL CULTURE; CELL LINEAGE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CYTOLOGY; DRUG EFFECT; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; METABOLISM; PLANT LEAF; PLANT ROOT; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELL; PRENATAL DEVELOPMENT; PROTOPLAST; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TOTIPOTENT STEM CELL; VASCULAR BUNDLE (PLANT);

CELL LINEAGE; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELLS, CULTURED; CYTOKININS; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; INDOLEACETIC ACIDS; MEDICAGO TRUNCATULA; PLANT LEAVES; PLANT ROOTS; PLANT VASCULAR BUNDLE; PLURIPOTENT STEM CELLS; PROTOPLASTS; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TOTIPOTENT STEM CELLS;

MEDICAGO TRUNCATULA;

EID: 79953183024     PISSN: 03057364     EISSN: 10958290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcq269     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abramoff MD, Magelhaes PJ, Ram SJ. 2004. Image processing with ImageJ. Biophotonics International 11: 36-42.
2. Braybrook SA, Harada JJ. 2008. LECS go crazy in embryo development. Trends in Plant Science 13: 624-630.
3. Carlsbecker A, Lee J-Y, Roberts CJ et al. 2010. Cell signalling by microRNA165/6 directs gene dose-dependent root cell fate. Nature 465: 316-321.
4. Chen S-K, Kurdyukov S, Kereszt A, Wang X-D, Gresshoff PM, Rose RJ. 2009. The association of homeobox gene expression with stem cell formation and morphogenesis in cultured Medicago truncatula. Planta 230: 827-840.
5. Dudits D, Bögre L, Györgyey J. 1991. Molecular and cellular approaches to the analysis of plant embryo development from somatic cells in vitro. Journal of Cell Science 99: 475-484.
6. 1 transition) of plant cells. Plant Signaling & Behaviour 3: 823-826.
7. Fosket DE, Roberts LW. 1964. Induction of wound-vessel differentiation in isolated Coleus stem segments in vitro. American Journal of Botany 51: 19-25.
8. Fukuda H. 2004. Signals that control plant vascular cell differentiation. Nature Reviews 5: 379-391. (Pubitemid 38579475)
9. Guzzo F, Baldan B, Mariani P, Lo Schiavo F, Terzi M. 1994. Studies on the origin of totipotent cells in explants of Daucus carota L. Journal of Experimental Botany 45: 1427-1432.
10. Halperin W. 1966. Alternative morphogenetic events in cell suspensions. American Journal of Botany 53: 443-453.
11. Hecht V, Vielle-Calzada JP, Hartog MV et al. 2001. The Arabidopsis SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR KINASE 1 gene is expressed in developing ovules and embryos and enhances embryogenic competence in culture. Plant Physiology 127: 803-816. (Pubitemid 33112143)
12. Imin N, De Jong F, Mathesius U et al. 2004. Proteome reference maps of Medicago truncatula embryogenic cell cultures generated from single protoplasts. Proteomics 4: 1883-1896. (Pubitemid 38880349)
13. Imin N, Nizamidin M, Daniher D, Nolan KE, Rose RJ, Rolfe BG. 2005. Proteomic analysis of somatic embryogenesis in Medicago truncatula: explant cultures grown under 6-benzylaminopurine and 1- naphthaleneacetic acid treatments. Plant Physiology 137: 1250-1260. (Pubitemid 43119326)
14. Imin N, Goffard N, Nizamidin M, Rolfe BG. 2008. Genome-wide transcriptional analysis of super-embryogenic Medicago truncatula explant cultures. BMC Plant Biology 8: 110. doi:10.1186/1471-2229-8-110.
15. Jacobs WmP. 1952. The role of auxin in differentiation of xylem around a wound. American Journal of Botany 39: 301-309.
16. Jenik PD, Barton MK. 2005. Surge and destroy: the role of auxin in plant embryogenesis. Development 132: 3577-3585. (Pubitemid 41301096)
17. Karami O, Aghavaisi B, Pour AM. 2009. Molecular aspects of somatic-embryogenic transition in plants. Journal of Chemical Biology 2: 177-190.
18. Kwaaitaal MACJ, de Vries SC. 2007. The SERK1 gene is expressed in procambium and immature vascular cells. Journal of Experimental Botany 58: 2887-2896. (Pubitemid 47511737)
19. Kragl M, Knapp D, Nacu E et al. 2009. Cells keep a memory of their tissue origin during axolotl limb regeneration. Nature 460: 60-65.
20. Kraus JE, De Sousa HC, Rezende MH, Castro NM, Luque R. 1998. Astra blue and basic fuchsin double staining of plant materials. Biotechnic and Histochemistry 73: 235-243. (Pubitemid 28516466)
21. Liu CM, Meinke DW. 1998. The titan mutants of Arabidopsis are disrupted in mitosis and cell cycle control during seed development. The Plant Journal 16: 21-31.
22. Loiseau J, Michaux-Ferrière N, Le Denunff Y. 1998. Histology of somatic embryogenesis in pea. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 36: 683-687. (Pubitemid 28443762)
23. Lu C-Y, Vasil IK. 1985. Histology of somatic embryogenesis in Panicum maximum (Guinea grass). American Journal of Botany 72: 1908-1913.
24. Mantiri FR, Kurdyukov S, Lohar DP et al. 2008. The transcription factor MtSERF1 of the ERF subfamily identified by transcriptional profiling is required for somatic embryogenesis induced by auxin plus cytokinin in Medicago truncatula. Plant Physiology 146: 1622-1636. (Pubitemid 352844063)
25. Murphy TM, Huerta AJ. 1990. Hydrogen peroxide formation in cultured rose cells in response to UV-C radiation. Physiologia Plantarum 78: 247-253.
26. Nolan KE, Rose RJ. 1998. Plant regeneration from cultured Medicago truncatula with particular reference to abscisic acid and light treatments. Australian Journal of Botany 46: 151-160. (Pubitemid 28205435)
27. Nolan KE, Irwanto RR, Rose RJ. 2003. Auxin up-regulates MtSERK1 expression in both Medicago truncatula root-forming and embryogenic cultures. Plant Physiology 133: 218-230. (Pubitemid 37144095)
28. Nolan KE, Kurdyukov S, Rose RJ. 2009. Expression of the SOMATIC EMBRYOGENESIS RECEPTOR-LIKE KINASE 1 (SERK1) gene is associated with developmental change in the life cycle of the model legume Medicago truncatula. Journal of Experimental Botany 60: 1759-1771.
29. Pasternak TP, Ötvös K, Domoki M, Fehér A. 2007. Linked activation of cell division and oxidative stress defense in alfalfa leaf protoplast-derived cells is dependent on exogenous auxin. Plant Growth Regulation 51: 109-117.
30. Rose RJ, Nolan KE. 1995. Regeneration of Medicago truncatula from protoplasts isolated from kanamycin-sensitive and kanamycin-resistant plants. Plant Cell Reports 14: 349-354.
31. Rose RJ, Nolan KE. 2006. Genetic regulation of somatic embryogenesis with particular reference to Arabidopsis thaliana and Medicago truncatula. In vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant 42: 473-481. (Pubitemid 46980136)
32. Rose RJ, Nolan E, Bicego L. 1999. The development of the highly regenerable seed line Jemalong 2HA for transformation of Medicago truncatula: implications for regenerability via somatic embryogenesis. Journal of Plant Physiology 155: 788-791. (Pubitemid 30044603)
33. Rose RJ, Wang X-D, Nolan KE, Rolfe BG. 2006. Root meristems in Medicago truncatula tissue culture arise from vascular-derived procambial-like cells in a process regulated by ethylene. Journal of Experimental Botany 57: 2227-2235. (Pubitemid 44289118)
34. Rose RJ, Mantiri F.R, Kurdyukov S et al. 2010. The developmental biology of somatic embryogenesis. In: Pua EC, Davey MR. eds. Plant developmental biology: biotechnology perspectives, Vol. 2. Berlin: Springer-Verlag, 3-26.
35. Sagare AP, Suhasini K, Krishnamurthy KV. 1995. Histology of somatic embryo initiation and development in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Plant Science 109: 87-93.
36. Scarpella E, Barkoulas M, Tsiantis M. 2010. Control of leaf and vein development by auxin. Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 2: a001511. doi:10.1101/cshperspect.a001511.
37. Schwendiman J, Pannetier C, Michaux-Ferriere N. 1988. Histology of somatic embryogenesis from leaf explants of the oil palm Elais guineensis. Annals of Botany 62: 43-52.
38. Schmidt EDL, Guzzo F, Toonen MAJ, de Vries SC. 1997. A leucine-rich repeat containing receptor-like kinase marks somatic plant cells competent to form embryos. Development 124: 2049-2062. (Pubitemid 27270273)
39. Sharma SK, Millam S. 2004. Somatic embryogenesis in Solanum tuberosum L.: a histological examination of key developmental stages. Plant Cell Reports 23: 115-119. (Pubitemid 39275230)
40. Sheahan MB, Rose RJ, McCurdy DW. 2004. Organelle inheritance in plant cell division: the actin cytoskeleton is required for unbiased inheritance of chloroplasts, mitochondria and endoplasmic reticulum in dividing protoplasts. The Plant Journal 37: 379-390. (Pubitemid 38192964)
41. Somleva MN, Schmidt EDL, de Vries SC. 2000. Embryogenic cells in Dactylis glomerata L. (Poaceae) explants identified by cell tracking and by SERK expression. Plant Cell Reports 19: 718-726. (Pubitemid 30427553)
42. Steward FC, Mapes O, Smith J. 1958. Growth and organised development of cultured cells. 1. Growth and division of freely suspended cells. American Journal of Botany 45: 693-703.
43. Steward FC, Mapes MO, Kent AE, Holsten RD. 1964. Growth and development of cultured plant cells. Science 143: 20-27.
44. Sussex IM. 2008. The scientific roots of modern biotechnology. The Plant Cell 20: 1189-1198.
45. Thibaud-Nissen FO, Shealy RT, Khanna A, Vodkin LO. 2003. Clustering of microarray data reveals transcript patterns associated with somatic embryogenesis in soybean. Plant Physiology 132: 118-136. (Pubitemid 36599267)
46. Thomas MR, Rose RJ. 1983. Plastid number and plastid structural changes associated with tobacco mesophyll protoplast culture and plant regeneration. Planta 158: 329-338.
47. Thomas MR, Johnson LB, White FF. 1990. Selection of interspecific somatic hybrids of Medicago by using Agrobacterium transformed tissues. Plant Science 69: 189-198.
48. Tian D, Rose RJ. 1999. Asymmetric somatic hybridisation between the annual legumes Medicago truncatula and Medicago scutellata. Plant Cell Reports 18: 989-996.
49. Vasil IK. 2008. A history of plant biotechnology: from the cell theory of Schleiden and Schwann to biotech crops. Plant Cell Reports 27: 1423-1440.
50. Verdeil J-L, Alemanno L, Niemenak N, Tranbarger TJ. 2007. Pluripotent versus totipotent plant stem cells: dependence versus autonomy? Trends in Plant Science 12: 245-252. (Pubitemid 46887680)
51. Vogel G. 2005. What don't we know? How does a single somatic cell become a whole plant. Science 309: 86. (Pubitemid 40934966)
52. Ye Z-H. 2002. Vascular tissue differentiation and pattern formation in plants.Annual Review of Plant Biology 53: 183-202. (Pubitemid 36257492)
53. Zheng Y, Ren N, Wang H, Stromberg AJ, Perry SE. 2009. Global identification of targets of the Arabidopsis MADS domain protein AGAMOUS-like 15. The Plant Cell 21: 2563-2577.