PICKLE is a CHD subfamily II ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factor

Biochimica et Biophysica Acta - Gene Regulatory Mechanisms

Volumn 1829, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 199-210

  Ho, Kwok Ki ^a   Zhang, Heng ^a   Golden, Barbara L ^a   Ogas, Joe ^a  

^a PURDUE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ATP dependent chromatin remodeler; CHD protein; Chromatin remodeling; Developmental identity; SANT SLIDE

Indexed keywords

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; PICKLE PROTEIN; PROTEIN; SINGLE STRANDED DNA; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; CONTROLLED STUDY; NONHUMAN; PHYLOGENY; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATASES; ADENOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; CHROMATIN; CHROMATIN ASSEMBLY AND DISASSEMBLY; DNA HELICASES; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, PLANT; HISTONES; LYSINE; MI-2 NUCLEOSOME REMODELING AND DEACETYLASE COMPLEX; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE DATA; PHYLOGENY;

ANIMALIA; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA;

EID: 84872416669     PISSN: 18749399     EISSN: 18764320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagrm.2012.10.011     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Wang D.Y., Kumar S., Hedges S.B. Divergence time estimates for the early history of animal phyla and the origin of plants, animals and fungi. Proc. Biol. Sci. 1999, 266:163-171.
2. Parfrey L.W., Lahr D.J., Knoll A.H., Katz L.A. Estimating the timing of early eukaryotic diversification with multigene molecular clocks. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108:13624-13629.
3. Meyerowitz E.M. Plants compared to animals: the broadest comparative study of development. Science 2002, 295:1482-1485.
4. Feng S., Jacobsen S.E., Reik W. Epigenetic reprogramming in plant and animal development. Science 2010, 330:622-627.
5. Woodage T., Basrai M.A., Baxevanis A.D., Hieter P., Collins F.S. Characterization of the CHD family of proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1997, 94:11472-11477.
6. Hall J.A., Georgel P.T. CHD proteins: a diverse family with strong ties. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2007, 85:463-476.
7. Sims J.K., Wade P.A. SnapShot: Chromatin remodeling: CHD. Cell 2011, 144:626-626. (e1 in Endnote).
8. Bienz M. The PHD finger, a nuclear protein-interaction domain. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2006, 31:35-40.
9. Ho L., Crabtree G.R. Chromatin remodelling during development. Nature 2010, 463:474-484.
10. Murawsky C.M., Brehm A., Badenhorst P., Lowe N., Becker P.B., Travers A.A. Tramtrack69 interacts with the dMi-2 subunit of the Drosophila NuRD chromatin remodelling complex. EMBO Rep. 2001, 2:1089-1094.
11. Yamasaki Y., Nishida Y. Mi-2 chromatin remodeling factor functions in sensory organ development through proneural gene repression in Drosophila. Dev. Growth Differ. 2006, 48:411-418.
12. Unhavaithaya Y., Shin T.H., Miliaras N., Lee J., Oyama T., Mello C.C. MEP-1 and a homolog of the NURD complex component Mi-2 Act Together to maintain germline-soma distinctions in C. elegans. Cell 2002, 111:991-1002.
13. Yoshida T., Hazan I., Zhang J., Ng S.Y., Naito T., Snippert H.J., Heller E.J., Qi X., Lawton L.N., Williams C.J., Georgopoulos K. The role of the chromatin remodeler Mi-2beta in hematopoietic stem cell self-renewal and multilineage differentiation. Genes Dev. 2008, 22:1174-1189.
14. Gnanapragasam M.N., Scarsdale J.N., Amaya M.L., Webb H.D., Desai M.A., Walavalkar N.M., Wang S.Z., Zhu S.Zu, Ginder G.D., Williams D.C. p66Alpha-MBD2 coiled-coil interaction and recruitment of Mi-2 are critical for globin gene silencing by the MBD2-NuRD complex. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2011, 108:7487-7492.
15. Ogas J., Kaufmann S., Henderson J., Somerville C. PICKLE is a CHD3 chromatin-remodeling factor that regulates the transition from embryonic to vegetative development in Arabidopsis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 1999, 96:13839-13844.
16. Eshed Y., Baum S.F., Bowman J.L. Distinct mechanisms promote polarity establishment in carpels of Arabidopsis. Cell 1999, 99:199-209.
17. Li H.C., Chuang K., Henderson J.T., Rider S.D., Bai Y., Zhang H., Fountain M., Gerber J., Ogas J. PICKLE acts during germination to repress expression of embryonic traits. Plant J. 2005, 44:1010-1022.
18. Zhang Y., LeRoy G., Seelig H.P., Lane W.S., Reinberg D. The dermatomyositis-specific autoantigen Mi2 is a component of a complex containing histone deacetylase and nucleosome remodeling activities. Cell 1998, 95:279-289.
19. Xue Y., Wong J., Moreno G.T., Young M.K., Cote J., Wang W. NURD, a novel complex with both ATP-dependent chromatin-remodeling and histone deacetylase activities. Mol. Cell 1998, 2:851-861.
20. Wade P.A., Jones P.L., Vermaak D., Wolffe A.P. A multiple subunit Mi-2 histone deacetylase from Xenopus laevis cofractionates with an associated Snf2 superfamily ATPase. Curr. Biol. 1998, 8:843-846.
21. Tong J.K., Hassig C.A., Schnitzler G.R., Kingston R.E., Schreiber S.L. Chromatin deacetylation by an ATP-dependent nucleosome remodelling complex. Nature 1998, 395:917-921.
22. Wolffe A.P., Urnov F.D., Guschin D. Co-repressor complexes and remodelling chromatin for repression. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2000, 28:379-386.
23. Gao Z., Huang Z., Olivey H.E., Gurbuxani S., Crispino J.D., Svensson E.C. FOG-1-mediated recruitment of NuRD is required for cell lineage re-enforcement during haematopoiesis. EMBO J. 2010, 29:457-468.
24. Aguilera C., Nakagawa K., Sancho R., Chakraborty A., Hendrich B., Behrens A. c-Jun N-terminal phosphorylation antagonises recruitment of the Mbd3/NuRD repressor complex. Nature 2011, 469:231-235.
25. Ahringer J. NuRD and SIN3 histone deacetylase complexes in development. Trends Genet. 2000, 16:351-356.
26. Brehm A., Langst G., Kehle J., Clapier C.R., Imhof A., Eberharter A., Muller J., Becker P.B. dMi-2 and ISWI chromatin remodelling factors have distinct nucleosome binding and mobilization properties. EMBO J. 2000, 19:4332-4341.
27. Kunert N., Wagner E., Murawska M., Klinker H., Kremmer E., Brehm A. dMec: a novel Mi-2 chromatin remodelling complex involved in transcriptional repression. EMBO J. 2009, 28:533-544.
28. Passannante M., Marti C.O., Pfefferli C., Moroni P.S., Kaeser-Pebernard S., Puoti A., Hunziker P., Wicky C., Muller F. Different Mi-2 complexes for various developmental functions in Caenorhabditis elegans. PLoS One 2010, 5:e13681.
29. Zhang H., Rider S.D., Henderson J.T., Fountain M., Chuang K., Kandachar V., Simons A., Edenberg H.J., Romero-Severson J., Muir W.M., Ogas J. The CHD3 remodeler PICKLE promotes trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283:22637-22648.
30. Aichinger E., Villar C.B., Farrona S., Reyes J.C., Hennig L., Kohler C. CHD3 proteins and polycomb group proteins antagonistically determine cell identity in Arabidopsis. PLoS Genet. 2009, 5:e1000605.
31. Zhang H., Bishop B., Ringenberg W., Muir W.M., Ogas J. The CHD3 remodeler PICKLE associates with genes enriched for trimethylation of histone H3 lysine 27. Plant Physiol. 2012, 159:418-432.
32. Williams C.J., Naito T., Arco P.G., Seavitt J.R., Cashman S.M., De Souza B., Qi X., Keables P., Von Andrian U.H., Georgopoulos K. The chromatin remodeler Mi-2beta is required for CD4 expression and T cell development. Immunity 2004, 20:719-733.
33. Murawska M., Hassler M., Renkawitz-Pohl R., Ladurner A., Brehm A. Stress-induced PARP activation mediates recruitment of Drosophila Mi-2 to promote heat shock gene expression. PLoS Genet. 2011, 7:e1002206.
34. Saether T., Berge T., Ledsaak M., Matre V., Alm-Kristiansen A.H., Dahle O., Aubry F., Gabrielsen O.S. The chromatin remodeling factor Mi-2alpha acts as a novel co-activator for human c-Myb. J. Biol. Chem. 2007, 282:13994-14005.
35. Hink W.F. Established insect cell line from the cabbage looper, Trichoplusia ni. Nature 1970, 226:466-467.
36. Lowary P.T., Widom J. New DNA sequence rules for high affinity binding to histone octamer and sequence-directed nucleosome positioning. J. Mol. Biol. 1998, 276:19-42.
37. Thompson B.A., Tremblay V., Lin G., Bochar D.A. CHD8 is an ATP-dependent chromatin remodeling factor that regulates beta-catenin target genes. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008, 28:3894-3904.
38. Luger K., Rechsteiner T.J., Richmond T.J. Preparation of nucleosome core particle from recombinant histones. Methods Enzymol. 1999, 304:3-19.
39. Dyer P.N., Edayathumangalam R.S., White C.L., Bao Y., Chakravarthy S., Muthurajan U.M., Luger K. Reconstitution of nucleosome core particles from recombinant histones and DNA. Methods Enzymol. 2004, 375:23-44.
40. Linxweiler W., Horz W. Reconstitution of mononucleosomes: characterization of distinct particles that differ in the position of the histone core. Nucleic Acids Res. 1984, 12:9395-9413.
41. Durr H., Hopfner K.P. Structure-function analysis of SWI2/SNF2 enzymes. Methods Enzymol. 2006, 409:375-388.
42. Lewis R., Durr H., Hopfner K.P., Michaelis J. Conformational changes of a Swi2/Snf2 ATPase during its mechano-chemical cycle. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008, 36:1881-1890.
43. Smith C.L., Peterson C.L. A conserved Swi2/Snf2 ATPase motif couples ATP hydrolysis to chromatin remodeling. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2005, 25:5880-5892.
44. Katoh K., Kuma K., Toh H., Miyata T. MAFFT version 5: improvement in accuracy of multiple sequence alignment. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005, 33:511-518.
45. Saitou N., Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol. Biol. Evol. 1987, 4:406-425.
46. Han M.V., Zmasek C.M. phyloXML: XML for evolutionary biology and comparative genomics. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10:356.
47. Zmasek C.M., Eddy S.R. ATV: display and manipulation of annotated phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 2001, 17:383-384.
48. Sharma A., Jenkins K.R., Heroux A., Bowman G.D. Crystal structure of the chromodomain helicase DNA-binding protein 1 (Chd1) DNA-binding domain in complex with DNA. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286:42099-42104.
49. Ryan D.P., Sundaramoorthy R., Martin D., Singh V., Owen-Hughes T. The DNA-binding domain of the Chd1 chromatin-remodelling enzyme contains SANT and SLIDE domains. EMBO J. 2011, 30:2596-2609.
50. Bouazoune K., Mitterweger A., Langst G., Imhof A., Akhtar A., Becker P.B., Brehm A. The dMi-2 chromodomains are DNA binding modules important for ATP-dependent nucleosome mobilization. EMBO J. 2002, 21:2430-2440.
51. Flanagan J.F., Mi L.Z., Chruszcz M., Cymborowski M., Clines K.L., Kim Y., Minor W., Rastinejad F., Khorasanizadeh S. Double chromodomains cooperate to recognize the methylated histone H3 tail. Nature 2005, 438:1181-1185.
52. Hauk G., McKnight J.N., Nodelman I.M., Bowman G.D. The chromodomains of the Chd1 chromatin remodeler regulate DNA access to the ATPase motor. Mol. Cell 2010, 39:711-723.
53. Aasland R., Stewart A.F., Gibson T. The SANT domain: a putative DNA-binding domain in the SWI-SNF and ADA complexes, the transcriptional co-repressor N-CoR and TFIIIB. Trends Biochem. Sci. 1996, 21:87-88.
54. Boyer L.A., Latek R.R., Peterson C.L. The SANT domain: a unique histone-tail-binding module?. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2004, 5:158-163.
55. Grune T., Brzeski J., Eberharter A., Clapier C.R., Corona D.F., Becker P.B., Muller C.W. Crystal structure and functional analysis of a nucleosome recognition module of the remodeling factor ISWI. Mol. Cell 2003, 12:449-460.
56. Bordoli L., Kiefer F., Arnold K., Benkert P., Battey J., Schwede T. Protein structure homology modeling using SWISS-MODEL workspace. Nat. Protoc. 2009, 4:1-13.
57. Arnold K., Bordoli L., Kopp J., Schwede T. The SWISS-MODEL workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:195-201.
58. Erickson H.P. Size and shape of protein molecules at the nanometer level determined by sedimentation, gel filtration, and electron microscopy. Biol. Proced. Online 2009, 11:32-51.
59. Klose R.J., Bird A.P. MeCP2 behaves as an elongated monomer that does not stably associate with the Sin3a chromatin remodeling complex. J. Biol. Chem. 2004, 279:46490-46496.
60. Saha A., Wittmeyer J., Cairns B.R. Chromatin remodeling by RSC involves ATP-dependent DNA translocation. Genes Dev. 2002, 16:2120-2134.
61. Polach K.J., Widom J. Mechanism of protein access to specific DNA sequences in chromatin: a dynamic equilibrium model for gene regulation. J. Mol. Biol. 1995, 254:130-149.
62. Whitehouse I., Flaus A., Cairns B.R., White M.F., Workman J.L., Owen-Hughes T. Nucleosome mobilization catalysed by the yeast SWI/SNF complex. Nature 1999, 400:784-787.
63. Langst G., Bonte E.J., Corona D.F., Becker P.B. Nucleosome movement by CHRAC and ISWI without disruption or trans-displacement of the histone octamer. Cell 1999, 97:843-852.
64. Rippe K., Schrader A., Riede P., Strohner R., Lehmann E., Langst G. DNA sequence- and conformation-directed positioning of nucleosomes by chromatin-remodeling complexes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104:15635-15640.
65. Guschin D., Wade P.A., Kikyo N., Wolffe A.P. ATP-Dependent histone octamer mobilization and histone deacetylation mediated by the Mi-2 chromatin remodeling complex. Biochemistry 2000, 39:5238-5245.
66. Marfella C.G., Imbalzano A.N. The Chd family of chromatin remodelers. Mutat. Res. 2007, 618:30-40.
67. Yamada K., Frouws T.D., Angst B., Fitzgerald D.J., DeLuca C., Schimmele K., Sargent D.F., Richmond T.J. Structure and mechanism of the chromatin remodelling factor ISW1a. Nature 2011, 472:448-453.
68. Stockdale C., Flaus A., Ferreira H., Owen-Hughes T. Analysis of Nucleosome Repositioning by Yeast ISWI and Chd1 Chromatin Remodeling Complexes. J. Biol. Chem. 2006, 281:16279-16288.
69. Lusser A., Urwin D.L., Kadonaga J.T. Distinct activities of CHD1 and ACF in ATP-dependent chromatin assembly. Nat. Struct. Mol. Biol. 2005, 12:160-166.
70. Hopfner K.P., Gerhold C.B., Lakomek K., Wollmann P. Swi2/Snf2 remodelers: hybrid views on hybrid molecular machines. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 2012, 22:225-233.
71. Shimono K., Shimono Y., Shimokata K., Ishiguro N., Takahashi M. Microspherule Protein 1, Mi-2{beta}, and RET Finger Protein Associate in the Nucleolus and Up-regulate Ribosomal Gene Transcription. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280:39436-39447.
72. Murawska M., Kunert N., van Vugt J., Langst G., Kremmer E., Logie C., Brehm A. dCHD3, a novel ATP-dependent chromatin remodeler associated with sites of active transcription. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2008, 28:2745-2757.
73. Jerzmanowski A. SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling and linker histones in plants. Biochim. Biophys. Acta 2007, 1769:330-345.
74. Talbert P.B., Henikoff S. Histone variants-ancient wrap artists of the epigenome. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2010, 11:264-275.
75. Ingouff M., Berger F. Histone3 variants in plants. Chromosoma 2010, 119:27-33.
76. Brzeski J., Jerzmanowski A. Deficient in DNA methylation 1 (DDM1) defines a novel family of chromatin-remodeling factors. J. Biol. Chem. 2003, 278:823-828.
77. Moshkin Y.M., Chalkley G.E., Kan T.W., Reddy B.A., Ozgur Z., van Ijcken W.F., Dekkers D.H., Demmers J.A., Travers A.A., Verrijzer C.P. Remodelers organize cellular chromatin by counteracting intrinsic histone-DNA sequence preferences in a class-specific manner. Mol. Cell. Biol. 2012, 32:675-688.