On the quest for validity: Testing the factor structure and measurement invariance of the technology-dimensions in the Technological, Pedagogical, and Content Knowledge (TPACK) model

Computers and Education

Volumn 112, Issue , 2017, Pages 1-17

  Scherer, Ronny ^a   Tondeur, Jo ^b   Siddiq, Fazilat ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

^b VRIJE UNIVERSITEIT BRUSSEL   (Belgium)

^c NORDIC INSTITUTE FOR STUDIES IN INNOVATION   (Norway)

Author keywords

Gender differences; Measurement invariance; Teacher education; Technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK); Validity

Indexed keywords

EDUCATION; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; FACTOR ANALYSIS; PERSONNEL TRAINING; SOCIAL SCIENCES;

CONFIRMATORY FACTOR ANALYSIS; CONTENT KNOWLEDGE; GENDER DIFFERENCES; PRE-SERVICE TEACHER; TEACHER EDUCATION; TEACHER TRAINING INSTITUTIONS; TECHNOLOGICAL KNOWLEDGE; VALIDITY;

TEACHING;

EID: 85018430225     PISSN: 03601315     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.compedu.2017.04.012     Document Type: Article

References (110)

1. Abbitt, J.T., An investigation of the relationship between self-efficacy beliefs about technology integration and technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) among preservice teachers. Journal of Digital Learning in Teacher Education 27:4 (2011), 134–143, 10.1080/21532974.2011.10784670.
2. AERA, APA, NCME, Standards for educational and psychological testing. 2014, American Educational Research Association (AERA), Washington, DC.
3. Antonietti, A., Giorgetti, M., Teachers' beliefs about learning from multimedia. Computers in Human Behavior 22:2 (2006), 267–282, 10.1016/j.chb.2004.06.002.
4. Archambault, L.M., Barnett, J.H., Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education 55:4 (2010), 1656–1662, 10.1016/j.compedu.2010.07.009.
5. Asparouhov, T., Muthén, B., Weighted least squares estimation with missing data. 2010, Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA.
6. Ay, Y., Karadağ, E., Acat, M.B., The Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge-practical (TPACK-Practical) model: Examination of its validity in the Turkish culture via structural equation modeling. Computers & Education 88 (2015), 97–108, 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.04.017.
7. Baek, Y., Jung, J., Kim, B., What makes teachers use technology in the classroom? Exploring the factors affecting facilitation of technology with a Korean sample. Computers & Education 50:1 (2008), 224–234, 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.05.002.
8. Bandura, A., Self-Efficacy: The Exercise of Control. 1997, Freeman, New York, NY.
9. Banoglu, K., Vanderlinde, R., Yildiz, R., Professional self-efficacy scale for information and computer technology teachers: Validity and reliability study. Anthropologist 20:1–2 (2015), 22–32.
10. Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Voss, T., Jordan, A., Tsai, Y.-M., Teachers' mathematical knowledge, cognitive activation in the classroom, and student progress. American Educational Research Journal 47:1 (2010), 133–180, 10.3102/0002831209345157.
11. Beauducel, A., Herzberg, P.Y., On the performance of maximum likelihood versus means and variance adjusted weighted least squares estimation in CFA. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 13:2 (2006), 186–203, 10.1207/s15328007sem1302_2.
12. Binkley, M., Erstad, O., Herman, J., Raizen, S., Ripley, M., Miller-Ricci, M., et al. Defining twenty-first century skills. Griffin, P., McGaw, B., Care, E., (eds.) Assessment and teaching of 21st century skills, 2012, Springer, Dordrecht, 17–66.
13. Blömeke, S., Suhl, U., Kaiser, G., Döhrmann, M., Family background, entry selectivity and opportunities to learn: What matters in primary teacher education? An international comparison of fifteen countries. Teaching and Teacher Education 28:1 (2012), 44–55, 10.1016/j.tate.2011.08.006.
14. Bong, M., Skaalvik, E.M., Academic self-concept and self-efficacy: How different are they Really? Educational psychology review., 15(1), 2003, 1–40, 10.1023/A:1021302408382.
15. Brown, T.A., Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research. 2 ed., 2015, Guilford Press, New York, NY.
16. Chai, C.S., Koh, J.H.L., Tsai, C.C., Facilitating preservice teachers' development of technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge (TPACK). Educational Technology & Society 13:4 (2010), 63–73.
17. Chai, C.S., Koh, J.H.L., Tsai, C.C., A review of technological pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Technology & Society 16:2 (2013), 31–51.
18. Chai, C.S., Koh, J.H.L., Tsai, C.C., A review of the quantitative measures of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Herring, M.C., Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., (eds.) Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators, 2 ed, 2016, Taylor & Francis, New York, London, 87–106.
19. Chai, C.S., Koh, J.H.L., Tsai, C.C., Tan, L.L.W., Modeling primary school pre-service teachers' Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge (TPACK) for meaningful learning with information and communication technology (ICT). Computers & Education 57:1 (2011), 1184–1193, 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.01.007.
20. Chen, F.F., Sensitivity of goodness of fit indexes to lack of measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 14:3 (2007), 464–504, 10.1080/10705510701301834.
21. Chen, F.F., West, S.G., Sousa, K.H., A comparison of bifactor and second-order models of quality of life. Multivariate Behavioral Research 41:2 (2006), 189–225, 10.1207/s15327906mbr4102_5.
22. Chesnut, S.R., Burley, H., Self-efficacy as a predictor of commitment to the teaching profession: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review 15 (2015), 1–16, 10.1016/j.edurev.2015.02.001.
23. Cheung, G.W., Rensvold, R.B., Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 9:2 (2002), 233–255, 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5.
24. Chou, C.-P., Huh, J., Model modification in structural equation modeling. Hoyle, R.H., (eds.) Handbook of structural equation modeling, 2012, The Guildford Press, New York, NY, 232–246.
25. Compton, D.M., Burkett, W.H., Burkett, G.G., No sex differences in perceived competence of computer use among male and female college students in 2002. Psychological Reports 92:2 (2003), 503–511, 10.2466/pr0.2003.92.2.503.
26. Durndell, A., Haag, Z., Computer self efficacy, computer anxiety, attitudes towards the Internet and reported experience with the Internet, by gender, in an East European sample. Computers in Human Behavior 18:5 (2002), 521–535, 10.1016/S0747-5632(02)00006-7.
27. Eid, M., Geiser, C., Koch, T., Heene, M., Anomalous results in g-factor Models: Explanations and alternatives. Psychological Methods, 2016, 10.1037/met0000083 No Pagination Specified.
28. Enders, C.K., Applied missing data analysis. 2010, Guilford Press, New York, NY.
29. Enders, C.K., Mansolf, M., Assessing the fit of structural equation models with multiply imputed data. Psychological Methods, 2016, 10.1037/met0000102 No Pagination Specified.
30. Fisser, P., Voogt, J., Van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2013). Unraveling the TPACK model: Finding TPACK-core. Paper presented at the Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, New Orleans, Louisiana, USA.
31. Fisser, P., Voogt, J., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Measuring and Assessing TPACK (technological, pedagogical, and content knowledge). Spector, J.M., (eds.) Encyclopaedia of educational technology, 2015, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 490–493.
32. Fraillon, J., Ainley, J., Schulz, W., Friedman, T., Gebhardt, E., Preparing for life in a digital age - the IEA international computer and information literacy study international report., 2014, Springer International Publishing, Heidelberg.
33. Gignac, G.E., Psychometrics and the measurement of emotional intelligence. Parker, A.J.D., Saklofske, H.D., Stough, C., (eds.) Assessing emotional Intelligence: Theory, research, and applications, 2009, Springer US, Boston, MA, 9–40.
34. Graham, C.R., Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education 57:3 (2011), 1953–1960, 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.04.010.
35. Graham, C.R., Borup, J., Smith, N.B., Using TPACK as a framework to understand teacher candidates' technology integration decisions. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 28:6 (2012), 530–546, 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2011.00472.x.
36. Grossman, P.L., Richert, A.E., Unacknowledged knowledge growth: A re-examination of the effects of teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education 4:1 (1988), 53–62, 10.1016/0742-051X(88)90024-8.
37. Guenole, N., Brown, A., The consequences of ignoring measurement invariance for path coefficients in structural equation models. Frontiers in Psychology, 5(980), 2014, 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00980.
38. He, J., Bartram, D., Inceoglu, I., van de Vijver, F.J.R., Response styles and personality traits: A multilevel analysis. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 45:7 (2014), 1028–1045, 10.1177/0022022114534773.
39. Hew, K.F., Brush, T., Integrating technology into K-12 teaching and learning: Current knowledge gaps and recommendations for future research. Educational Technology Research and Development 55:3 (2006), 223–252, 10.1007/s11423-006-9022-5.
40. Holzberger, D., Philipp, A., Kunter, M., How teachers' self-efficacy is related to instructional quality: A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology 105:3 (2013), 774–786, 10.1037/a0032198.
41. Jansen, M., Scherer, R., Schroeders, U., Students' self-concept and self-efficacy in the sciences: Differential relations to antecedents and educational outcomes. Contemporary Educational Psychology 41 (2015), 13–24, 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2014.11.002.
42. Jen, T.-H., Yeh, Y.-F., Hsu, Y.-S., Wu, H.-K., Chen, K.-M., Science teachers' TPACK-Practical: Standard-setting using an evidence-based approach. Computers & Education 95 (2016), 45–62, 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.009.
43. Kaya, S., Dağ, F., Turkish adaptation of technological pedagogical content knowledge survey for elementary teachers. Educational Sciences: Theory & Practice 13:1 (2013), 302–306.
44. Khojasteh, J., Lo, W.-J., Investigating the sensitivity of goodness-of-fit indices to detect measurement invariance in a bifactor model. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 22:4 (2015), 531–541, 10.1080/10705511.2014.937791.
45. Klassen, R.M., Chiu, M.M., Effects on teachers' self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology 102:3 (2010), 741–756, 10.1037/a0019237.
46. Klassen, R.M., Tze, V.M.C., Teachers' self-efficacy, personality, and teaching effectiveness: A meta-analysis. Educational Research Review 12 (2014), 59–76, 10.1016/j.edurev.2014.06.001.
47. Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., et al. Teachers' content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: The role of structural differences in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education 64:1 (2013), 90–106, 10.1177/0022487112460398.
48. Kline, R.B., Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. 2005, Guilford Press, New York.
49. Koch, S.C., Müller, S.M., Sieverding, M., Women and computers. Effects of stereotype threat on attribution of failure. Computers & Education 51:4 (2008), 1795–1803, 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.05.007.
50. Koehler, M.J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T.S., Graham, C.R., The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework. Spector, M.J., Merrill, D.M., Elen, J., Bishop, J.M., (eds.) Handbook of research on educational communications and technology, 2014, Springer, New York, NY, 101–111.
51. Koehler, M.J., Shin, T.S., Mishra, P., How do we measure TPACK? Let me count the ways. Ronau, R.N., Rakes, C.R., Niess, M.L., (eds.) Educational technology, teacher knowledge, and classroom impact: A research handbook on frameworks and approaches, 2012, IGI Global, Hersey, PA, 16–31.
52. Koh, J.H.L., Chai, C.S., Tay, L.Y., TPACK-in-Action: Unpacking the contextual influences of teachers' construction of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education 78 (2014), 20–29, 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.04.022.
53. Koh, J.H.L., Chai, C.S., Tsai, C.-C., Examining the technological pedagogical content knowledge of Singapore pre-service teachers with a large-scale survey. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 26:6 (2010), 563–573.
54. Koh, J.H.L., Chai, C.S., Tsai, C.C., Examining practicing teachers' perceptions of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) pathways: A structural equation modeling approach. Instructional Science 41:4 (2013), 793–809, 10.1007/s11251-012-9249-y.
55. Kopcha, T.J., Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A., Jung, J., Baser, D., Examining the TPACK framework through the convergent and discriminant validity of two measures. Computers & Education 78 (2014), 87–96, 10.1016/j.compedu.2014.05.003.
56. Krauss, S., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Secondary mathematics teachers' pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge: Validation of the COACTIV constructs. ZDM 40:5 (2008), 873–892, 10.1007/s11858-008-0141-9.
57. Krauss, S., Brunner, M., Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Neubrand, M., et al. Pedagogical content knowledge and content knowledge of secondary mathematics teachers. Journal of Educational Psychology 100:3 (2008), 716–725, 10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.716.
58. Krauss, S., Blum, W., Brunner, M., Neubrand, M., Baumert, J., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Mathematics teachers' domain-specific professional knowledge: Conceptualization and test construction in COACTIV. Kunter, M., Baumert, J., Blum, W., Klusmann, U., Krauss, S., Neubrand, M., (eds.) Cognitive activation in the mathematics classroom and professional competence of Teachers: Results from the COACTIV project, 2013, Springer US, Boston, MA, 147–174.
59. Lei, P.-W., Wu, Q., Estimation in structural equation modeling. Hoyle, R.H., (eds.) Handbook of structural equation modeling, 2012, Guilford Press, New York, NY, 164–180.
60. Marsh, H.W., Hau, K.-T., Grayson, D., Goodness of fit evaluation in structural equation modeling. Maydeu-Olivares, A., McArdle, J.J., (eds.) Contemporary psychometrics, Vols. 275–340, 2005, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
61. Marsh, H.W., Hau, K.-T., Wen, Z., In search of golden Rules: Comment on hypothesis-testing approaches to setting cutoff values for fit indexes and dangers in overgeneralizing Hu and Bentler's (1999) findings. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 11:3 (2004), 320–341, 10.1207/s15328007sem1103_2.
62. Marsh, H.W., Morin, A.J., Parker, P.D., Kaur, G., Exploratory structural equation modeling: An integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 10 (2014), 85–110, 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700.
63. Marsh, H.W., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Lüdtke, O., Robitzsch, A., Morin, A.J.S., et al. Exploratory structural equation modeling, integrating CFA and EFA: Application to students' evaluations of university teaching. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal 16:3 (2009), 439–476, 10.1080/10705510903008220.
64. McDonald, R.P., Test theory: A unified treatment. 1999, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
65. Meade, A.W., Johnson, E.C., Braddy, P.W., Power and sensitivity of alternative fit indices in tests of measurement invariance. Journal of Applied Psychology 93:3 (2008), 568–592, 10.1037/0021-9010.93.3.568.
66. Messick, S., Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons' responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist 50:9 (1995), 741–749, 10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741.
67. Millsap, R.E., Statistical approaches to measurement invariance. 2011, Routledge, New York, NY.
68. Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J., Technological pedagogical content knowledge: A framework for teacher knowledge. Teachers College Record 108:6 (2006), 1017–1054, 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.
69. Muthén, B., Muthén, L., MPlus (version 7.3). 1998-2015, Muthén & Muthén, Los Angeles, CA.
70. OECD, TALIS 2013 results. 2014, OECD Publishing, Paris.
71. Olofson, M.W., Swallow, M.J.C., Neumann, M.D., TPACKing: A constructivist framing of TPACK to analyze teachers' construction of knowledge. Computers & Education 95 (2016), 188–201, 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.12.010.
72. Pamuk, S., Peker, D., Turkish pre-service science and mathematics teachers' computer related self-efficacies, attitudes, and the relationship between these variables. Computers & Education 53:2 (2009), 454–461, 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.03.004.
73. Paulick, I., Großschedl, J., Harms, U., Möller, J., Preservice teachers' professional knowledge and its relation to academic self-concept. Journal of Teacher Education, 2016, 10.1177/0022487116639263.
74. Plumm, K.M., Technology in the classroom: Burning the bridges to the gaps in gender-biased education?. Computers & Education 50:3 (2008), 1052–1068, 10.1016/j.compedu.2006.10.005.
75. Price, L., Psychometric methods. 2017, The Guilford Press, New York, NY.
76. Revelle, W., Zinbarg, R.E., Coefficients alpha, beta, omega, and the glb: Comments on sijtsma. Psychometrika 74:1 (2008), 145–154, 10.1007/s11336-008-9102-z.
77. Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P.É., Savalei, V., When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods 17:3 (2012), 354–373, 10.1037/a0029315.
78. Rodriguez, A., Reise, S.P., Haviland, M.G., Evaluating bifactor Models: Calculating and interpreting statistical indices. Psychological Methods, 2015, 10.1037/met0000045.
79. Rutkowski, L., Svetina, D., Assessing the hypothesis of measurement invariance in the context of large-scale international surveys. Educational and Psychological Measurement 74:1 (2014), 31–57, 10.1177/0013164413498257.
80. Sahin, I., Development of survey of technological pedagogical and content knowledge (TPACK). The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology 10:1 (2011), 97–105.
81. Sang, G., Tondeur, J., Chai, C.S., Dong, Y., Validation and profile of Chinese pre-service teachers' technological pedagogical content knowledge scale. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education 44:1 (2016), 49–65, 10.1080/1359866X.2014.960800.
82. Sang, G., Valcke, M., Braak, J. v., Tondeur, J., Student teachers' thinking processes and ICT integration: Predictors of prospective teaching behaviors with educational technology. Computers & Education 54:1 (2010), 103–112, 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.010.
83. Satorra, A., Bentler, P.M., Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika 75:2 (2010), 243–248, 10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y.
84. Scherer, R., Jansen, M., Nilsen, T., Areepattamannil, S., Marsh, H.W., The quest for Comparability: Studying the invariance of the teachers' sense of self-efficacy (TSES) measure across countries. PLoS One, 11(3), 2016, 10.1371/journal.pone.0150829.
85. Scherer, R., Nilsen, T., Jansen, M., Evaluating individual students' perceptions of instructional quality: An investigation of their factor structure, measurement invariance, and relations to educational outcomes. Frontiers in Psychology, 7(110), 2016, 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00110.
86. Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., Revisiting teachers' computer self-efficacy: A differentiated view on gender differences. Computers in Human Behavior 53 (2015), 48–57, 10.1016/j.chb.2015.06.038.
87. Scherer, R., Siddiq, F., Teo, T., Becoming more specific: Measuring and modeling teachers' perceived usefulness of ICT in the context of teaching and learning. Computers & Education 88:0 (2015), 202–214, 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.05.005.
88. Schmidt, D.A., Baran, E., Thompson, A.D., Mishra, P., Koehler, M.J., Shin, T.S., Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Journal of Research on Technology in Education 42:2 (2009), 123–149, 10.1080/15391523.2009.10782544.
89. Schmidt, W.H., Cogan, L., Houang, R., The role of opportunity to learn in teacher Preparation: An international context. Journal of Teacher Education 62:2 (2011), 138–153.
90. Shrout, P.E., Bolger, N., Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods 7:4 (2002), 422–445, 10.1037/1082-989X.7.4.422.
91. Shulman, L.S., Those who Understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher 15:2 (1986), 4–14, 10.3102/0013189x015002004.
92. Shulman, L.S., Knowledge and Teaching: Foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review 57:1 (1987), 1–23, 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.
93. Sieverding, M., Koch, S.C., (Self-)Evaluation of computer competence: How gender matters. Computers & Education 52:3 (2009), 696–701, 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.11.016.
94. Skaalvik, E.M., Skaalvik, S., Dimensions of teacher self-efficacy and relations with strain factors, perceived collective teacher efficacy, and teacher burnout. Journal of Educational Psychology 99:3 (2007), 611–625, 10.1037/0022-0663.99.3.611.
95. Snijders, T.A.B., Bosker, R.J., Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. 2 ed., 2012, Sage, London.
96. Tatto, M.T., Peck, R., Schwille, J., Bankov, K., Senk, S.L., Rodriguez, M.C., Rowley, G., Policy, practice, and readiness to teach primary and secondary mathematics in 17 Countries: Findings from the IEA teacher education and development study in mathematics (TEDS-M). 2012, International Association for the Evaluation of Educational Achievement (IEA), Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
97. Teo, T., Factors influencing teachers' intention to use technology: Model development and test. Computers & Education 57:4 (2011), 2432–2440, 10.1016/j.compedu.2011.06.008.
98. Teo, T., Lee, C.B., Chai, C.S., Wong, S.L., Assessing the intention to use technology among pre-service teachers in Singapore and Malaysia: A multigroup invariance analysis of the technology acceptance model (TAM). Computers & Education 53:3 (2009), 1000–1009, 10.1016/j.compedu.2009.05.017.
99. Tondeur, J., van Keer, H., van Braak, J., Valcke, M., ICT integration in the classroom: Challenging the potential of a school policy. Computers & Education 51:1 (2008), 212–223, 10.1016/j.compedu.2007.05.003.
100. Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Siddiq, F., Scherer, R., Time for a new approach to prepare future teachers for educational technology use: Its meaning and measurement. Computers & Education 94 (2016), 134–150, 10.1016/j.compedu.2015.11.009.
101. Tondeur, J., Van de Velde, S., Vermeersch, H., Van Houtte, M., Gender differences in the ICT profile of university students: A quantitative analysis. Journal of Diversity and Gender Studies 3:1 (2016), 57–77.
102. Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A.W., The differential antecedents of self-efficacy beliefs of novice and experienced teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education 23:6 (2007), 944–956, 10.1016/j.tate.2006.05.003.
103. Tschannen-Moran, M., Hoy, A.W., Hoy, W.K., Teacher Efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research 68:2 (1998), 202–248, 10.3102/00346543068002202.
104. Tschannen-Moran, M., Johnson, D., Exploring literacy teachers' self-efficacy beliefs: Potential sources at play. Teaching and Teacher Education 27:4 (2011), 751–761, 10.1016/j.tate.2010.12.005.
105. Usher, E.L., Pajares, F., Sources of self-efficacy in School: Critical review of the literature and future directions. Review of Educational Research 78:4 (2008), 751–796, 10.3102/0034654308321456.
106. Vekiri, I., Chronaki, A., Gender issues in technology use: Perceived social support, computer self-efficacy and value beliefs, and computer use beyond school. Computers & Education 51:3 (2008), 1392–1404, 10.1016/j.compedu.2008.01.003.
107. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., van Braak, J., & Tondeur, J. (2013). Unraveling the TPACK model: finding TPACK-Core. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Society for Information Technology and Teacher Education (SITE), New Orleans.
108. Voogt, J., Fisser, P., Pareja Roblin, N., Tondeur, J., van Braak, J., Technological pedagogical content knowledge – a review of the literature. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 29:2 (2013), 109–121, 10.1111/j.1365-2729.2012.00487.x.
109. Zee, M., de Jong, P.F., Koomen, H.M.Y., Teachers' self-efficacy in relation to individual students with a variety of social–emotional behaviors: A multilevel investigation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2016, 10.1037/edu0000106.
110. Zumbo, B.D., Validity: Foundational issues and statistical methodology. Rao, C.R., Sinharay, S., (eds.) Psychometrics, Vol. 26, 2006, Elsevier, Amsterdam, 45–79.