Transition to manual: Comparing simulator with on-road control transitions

Accident Analysis and Prevention

Volumn 102, Issue , 2017, Pages 227-234

  Eriksson, A ^a   Banks, V A ^b   Stanton, N A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Automated driving; Driver behaviour; Simulator validity; Transfer of control; Vehicle automation

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; AUTOMOBILE SIMULATORS; DRIVEWAYS; RESEARCH LABORATORIES; ROADS AND STREETS; SIMULATORS; TRANSPORTATION; VEHICLES;

AUTOMATED DRIVING; DRIVER BEHAVIOUR; HUMAN-AUTOMATION INTERACTIONS; PERCEIVED USEFULNESS; POSITIVE CORRELATIONS; ROAD DRIVING CONDITIONS; TRANSFER OF CONTROLS; VEHICLE AUTOMATIONS;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

ADULT; AUTOMATION; CAR DRIVING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MOTOR PERFORMANCE; STANDARDS; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AUTOMATION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTOR SKILLS; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 85015825225     PISSN: 00014575     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2017.03.011     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Albert, M., Lange, A., Schmidt, A., Wimmer, M., Bengler, K., Automated driving–Assessment of interaction concepts under real driving conditions. Procedia Manuf. 3 (2015), 2832–2839.
2. Baayen, R.H., Milin, P., Analyzing reaction times. Int. J. Psychol. Res. 3:2 (2010), 12–28.
3. Banks, V.A., Stanton, N.A., Hands and feet free driving: ready or not?. Landry, N.S.S., Bucchianico, G.D., Vallicelli, A., (eds.) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation: Part II: AHFE Conference, 2014.
4. Banks, V.A., Stanton, N.A., Contrasting models of driver behaviour in emergencies using retrospective verbalisations and network analysis. Ergonomics 58:8 (2015), 1337–1346.
5. Banks, V.A., Stanton, N.A., Keep the driver in control: automating automobiles of the future. Appl. Ergon. 53:Pt. B (2016), 389–395.
6. Banks, V.A., Stanton, N.A., The unknown paradox of stop the crash systems: are we really improving driver safety?. Stanton, N.A., Landry, S., Bucchianico, G.D., Vallicelli, A., (eds.) Advances in Human Aspects of Transportation, 2017, Springer, 525–533.
7. Banks, V.A., Stanton, N.A., Harvey, C., Sub-systems on the road to vehicle automation: hands and feet free but not ‘mind’ free driving. Saf. Sci. 62 (2014), 505–514.
8. Beggiato, M., Pereira, M., Petzoldt, T., Krems, J., Learning and development of trust, acceptance and the mental model of ACC. A longitudinal on-road study. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 35 (2015), 75–84.
9. Blaauw, G.J., Driving experience and task demands in simulator and instrumented car: a validation study. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 24:4 (1982), 473–486.
10. Blincoe, L., Miller, T., Zaloshnja, E., Lawrence, B., 2015. The economic and societal impact of motor vehicle crashes 2010. (Revised) (Report No DOT HS 812013). Washington, DC: National Highway Traffic Safety Administration.
11. Boer, E.R., Della Penna, M., Utz, H., Pedersen, L., Sierhuis, M., The role of driving simulators in developing and evaluating autonomous vehicles. Paper Presented at the the Driving Simulation Conference Europe Paris, France, 2015.
12. Bosch, Making the Most of Car Time., 2015 http://annual-report.bosch.com/AUTOMATED-DRIVING.
13. Byers, J.C., Bittner, A., Hill, S., Traditional and raw task load index (TLX) correlations: are paired comparisons necessary. Adv. Ind. Ergon. Saf. I, 1989, 481–485.
14. Carsten, O., Jamson, A., Driving simulators as research tools in traffic psychology. Porter, B., (eds.) Handbook of Traffic Psychology, vol. 1, 2011, Academic Press, 87–96.
15. Cooper, J.M., Vladisavljevic, I., Medeiros-Ward, N., Martin, P.T., Strayer, D.L., An investigation of driver distraction near the tipping point of traffic flow stability. Hum. Factors: J. Hum. Factors Ergon. Soc. 51:2 (2009), 261–268.
16. Dahlbäck, N., Jönsson, A., Ahrenberg, L., Wizard of Oz studies: why and how. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Orlando, Florida, 1993 USA—January 04-07, 1993.
17. Daimler, The Auto Pilot for Trucks: Highway Pilot. 2016 https://www.daimler.com/innovation/autonomous-driving/special/technology-trucks.html.
18. De Winter, J.C.F., van Leeuwen, P., Happee, R., Advantages and disadvantages of driving simulators: a discussion. Paper Presented at the Measuring Behavior, Utrecht, The Netherlands, 2012 August 28–31, 2012.
19. De Winter, J.C., Happee, R., Martens, M.H., Stanton, N.A., Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: a review of the empirical evidence. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 27 (2014), 196–217.
20. Eriksson, A., Stanton, N.A., Take-over time in highly automated vehicles: non-critical transitions to and from manual control. Hum. Factors, 2017 Available on http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018720816685832.
21. Eriksson, A., Lindström, A., Seward, A., Seward, A., Kircher, K., Can user-paced, menu-free spoken language interfaces improve dual task handling while driving?. Human-Computer Interaction. Advanced Interaction Modalities and Techniques, 2014, Springer, 394–405.
22. European Commission, Towards a European Road Safety Area: Policy Orientations on Road Safety 2011–2020. 2010, European Commission.
23. Flach, J., Dekker, S., Stappers, P.J., Playing twenty questions with nature (the surprise version): reflections on the dynamics of experience. Theor. Issues Ergon. Sci. 9:2 (2008), 125–154.
24. Godley, S.T., Triggs, T.J., Fildes, B.N., Driving simulator validation for speed research. Accid. Anal. Prev. 34:5 (2002), 589–600.
25. Gold, C., Damböck, D., Lorenz, L., Bengler, K., “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 2013.
26. Google, 2015. Google Self-Driving Car Testing Report on Disengagements of Autonomous Mode. https://static.googleusercontent.com/media/www.google.com/en//selfdrivingcar/files/reports/report-annual-15.pdf Accessed on 01 June 2016.
27. Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E., Development of NASA-TLX (Task load index): results of empirical and theoretical research. Adv. Psychol. 52 (1988), 139–183.
28. Hubert, M., Vandervieren, E., An adjusted boxplot for skewed distributions. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 52:12 (2008), 5186–5201.
29. Ishida, S., Gayko, J.E., Development, evaluation and introduction of a lane keeping assistance system. Paper Presented at the Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2004 IEEE, 2004.
30. Jæger, M.G., Skov, M.B., Thomassen, N.G., You can touch, but you can't look: interacting with in-vehicle systems. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 2008.
31. Kalra, N., Paddock, S.M., Driving to safety: how many miles of driving would it take to demonstrate autonomous vehicle reliability?. Transp. Res. Part A: Policy Pract. 94 (2016), 182–193.
32. Kaptein, N., Theeuwes, J., Van Der Horst, R., Driving simulator validity: some considerations. Transp. Res. Record: J. Transp. Res. Board, 1996, 30–36.
33. Kircher, K., Larsson, A., Hultgren, J.A., Tactical driving behavior with different levels of automation. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 15 (2014), 158–167.
34. Kircher, K., Eriksson, O., Forsman, Å., Vadeby, Å., Ahlstrom, C., Design and analysis of semi-controlled studies. Transp. Res. part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav., 2016 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2016.06.016.
35. Kurokawa, K., Wierwille, W.W., Validation of a driving simulation facility for instrument panel task performance. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, October 1990 Santa Monica, CA, 1990 SAGE Publications.
36. Larsson, A.F.L., Kircher, K., Andersson Hultgren, J., Learning from experience: familiarity with ACC and responding to a cut-in situation in automated driving. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 27:Part B (2014), 229–237.
37. Levin, S., Woolf, N., Tesla Driver Killed While Using Autopilot Was Watching Harry Potter, Witness Says. 2016 Retrieved 24 Aug 2016, from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2016/jul/01/tesla-driver-killed-autopilot-self-driving-car-harry-potter.
38. Llaneras, R.E., Salinger, J., Green, C.A., Human factors issues associated with limited ability autonomous driving systems: drivers’ allocation of visual attention to the forward roadway. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 7th International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, 2013, 92–98 Bolton Landing, New York.
39. Lu, Z., de Winter, J.C.F., A review and framework of control authority transitions in automated driving. Procedia Manuf. 3 (2015), 2510–2517.
40. Mayhew, D.R., Simpson, H.M., Wood, K.M., Lonero, L., Clinton, K.M., Johnson, A.G., On-road and simulated driving: concurrent and discriminant validation. J. Saf. Res. 42:4 (2011), 267–275.
41. Mercedes-Benz, Intelligent Drive Next Level as Part of Driving Assistance Package. 2015 https://www.mercedes-benz.com/en/mercedes-benz/innovation/with-intelligent-drive-more-comfort-in-road-traffic/.
42. Moore, G.E., Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electron 38 (1965), 114–117.
43. Morando, A., Victor, T., Dozza, M., Drivers anticipate lead-vehicle conflicts during automated longitudinal control: sensory cues capture driver attention and promote appropriate and timely responses. Accid. Anal. Prev. 97 (2016), 206–219.
44. Musk, E., Interview at ‘Future Transport Solutions’ Conference. 2016 https://youtube/HaJAF4tQVbA?t=1341 Quote at 22 minutes 36 seconds: retrieved on 12 May 2016.
45. National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Preliminary Statement of Policy Concerning Automated Vehicles. 2013.
46. Nilsson, L., Safety effects of adaptive cruise control in critical traffic situations. Paper Presented at the the Second World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems: ‘Steps Forward‘, Yokohama, 1995.
47. Porter, J.M., Case, K., Marshall, R., Gyi, D., Sims neé Oliver, R., ‘Beyond Jack and Jill’: designing for individuals using HADRIAN. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 33:3 (2004), 249–264.
48. Rümelin, S., Butz, A., How to make large touch screens usable while driving. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, 2013.
49. Ross, P., Tesla Reveals Its Crowdsourced Autopilot Data. 2016, IEEE Spectrum http://spectrum.ieee.org/cars-that-think/transportation/self-driving/tesla-reveals-its-crowdsourced-autopilot-data Accessed on 1 June 2016.
50. Russel, S., Norvig, P., Artificial Intelligence A Modern Approach. 3rd edition ed., 2009.
51. Ryan, T., Joiner, B., Normal probability plots and tests for normality. Minitab Statistical Software: Technical Reports, 1976, The Pennsylvania State University, State College, PA Available from MINITAB: Inc.
52. J3016, S.A.E., Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to Driving Automation Systems for On-Road Motor Vehicles, J3016_201609. 2016, SAE International.
53. Santos, J., Merat, N., Mouta, S., Brookhuis, K., De Waard, D., The interaction between driving and in-vehicle information systems: comparison of results from laboratory, simulator and real-world studies. Transp. Res. Part F, 2005, 135–146.
54. Seppelt, B.D., Lee, J.D., Making adaptive cruise control (ACC) limits visible. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 65:3 (2007), 192–205.
55. Shechtman, O., Classen, S., Awadzi, K., Mann, W., Comparison of driving errors between on-the-road and simulated driving assessment: a validation study. Traffic Inj. Prev. 10:4 (2009), 379–385.
56. Stanton, N.A., Marsden, P., From fly-by-wire to drive-by-wire: safety implications of automation in vehicles. Saf. Sci. 24:1 (1996), 35–49.
57. Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Human error taxonomies applied to driving: a generic driver error taxonomy and its implications for intelligent transport systems. Saf. Sci. 47:2 (2009), 227–237.
58. Stanton, N.A., Young, M.S., Driver behaviour with adaptive cruise control. Ergonomics 48:10 (2005), 1294–1313.
59. Stanton, N.A., Young, M., McCaulder, B., Drive-by-wire: the case of driver workload and reclaiming control with adaptive cruise control. Saf. Sci. 27:2–3 (1997), 149–159.
60. Stanton, N.A., Young, M.S., Walker, G.H., Turner, H., Randle, S., Automating the driver's control tasks. Int. J. Cogn. Ergon. 5:3 (2001), 221–236.
61. Stanton, N.A., Dunoyer, A., Leatherland, A., Detection of new in-path targets by drivers using stop & go adaptive cruise control. Appl. Ergon. 42:4 (2011), 592–601.
62. Stanton, N.A., Responses to autonomous vehicles. Ingenia, 62(69), 2015 March.
63. Tesla Motors, 2016. Model S Software Version 7.0. vol no, pp. Retrieved from https://www.teslamotors.com/presskit/autopilot.
64. Underwood, G., Crundall, D., Chapman, P., Driving simulator validation with hazard perception. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 14:6 (2011), 435–446.
65. United Nations, 1968. Convention on road traffic, Done at Vienna on 8 November 1968. Amendment 1. Retrieved from http://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/conventn/crt1968e.pdf.
66. Van Der Laan, J.D., Heino, A., De Waard, D., A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics. Transp. Res. Part C: Emerg. Technol. 5:1 (1997), 1–10.
67. Van Winsum, W., Brookhuis, K.A., De Waard, D., A comparison of different ways to approximate time-to-line crossing (TLC) during car driving. Accid. Anal. Prev. 32:1 (2000), 47–56 no 32.
68. Volvo Cars, Intellisafe Autopilot. 2016 http://www.volvocars.com/intl/about/our-innovation-brands/intellisafe/intellisafe-autopilot.
69. Walker, G.H., Stanton, N.A., Salmon, P.M., Human Factors in Automotive Engineering and Technology. 2015, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
70. Wang, Y., Mehler, B., Reimer, B., Lammers, V., D'Ambrosio, L.A., Coughlin, J.F., The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: a comparison with field testing. Ergonomics 53:3 (2010), 404–420.
71. World Health Organization, Global Status Report on Road Safety: Time for Action., 2009, World Health Organization.
72. Young, M.S., Stanton, N.A., Back to the future: brake reaction times for manual and automated vehicles. Ergonomics 50:1 (2007), 46–58.
73. euroFOT, euroFOT – Bringing Intelligent Vehicles to the Road. 2012 Retrieved from: http://www.eurofot-ip.eu/.
74. safecarnews.com, 2015. Intelligent Drive Concept for new Mercedes-Benz GLC. from http://safecarnews.com/intelligent-drive-concept-for-new-mercedes-benz-glc_ju6145/.