Making adaptive cruise control (ACC) limits visible

International Journal of Human Computer Studies

Volumn 65, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 192-205

  Seppelt, Bobbie D ^a   Lee, John D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

ACC; Automation failure; Collision warnings; EID; Reliance

Indexed keywords

ACCIDENT PREVENTION; ADAPTIVE CONTROL SYSTEMS; ALGORITHMS; BRAKING; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; SAFETY FACTOR;

ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL (ACC); AUTOMATION FAILURE; COLLISION WARNINGS; DRIVING SAFETY; ECOLOGICAL INTERFACE DESIGN (EID); TIME HEADWAY (THW);

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS;

EID: 33846187688     PISSN: 10715819     EISSN: 10959300     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2006.10.001     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Bagheri, N., Jamieson, G.A., 2004. The impact of context-related reliability on automation failure detection and scanning behavior. In: IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, pp. 212-217.
2. Bisantz A.M., and Seong Y. Assessment of operator trust in and utilization of automated decision-aids under different framing conditions. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics 28 2 (2001) 85-97
3. Davis L.C. Effect of adaptive cruise control on traffic flow. Physical Review E 69 6 (2004) 1-8
4. Dzindolet M.T., Peterson S.A., Pomranky R.A., Pierce L.G., and Beck H.P. The role of trust in automation reliance. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 58 6 (2003) 697-718
5. Fancher P., Bareket Z., and Ervin R. Human-centered design of an Acc-with-braking and forward-crash-warning system. Vehicle System Dynamics 36 2-3 (2001) 203-223
6. Finger R., and Bisantz A.M. Utilizing graphical formats to convey uncertainty in a decision-making task. Theoretical Issues in Ergonomics Science 3 1 (2002) 1-25
7. Goodrich M.A., and Boer E.R. Model-based human-centered task automation: a case study in ACC system design. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part A-Systems and Humans 33 3 (2003) 325-336
8. Hajdukiewicz J.R., and Vicente K.J. Designing for adaptation to novelty and change: functional information, emergent feature graphics, and higher-level control. Human Factors 44 4 (2002) 592-610
9. Hills B.L. Vision, visibility, and perception in driving. Perception 9 2 (1980) 183-216
10. Hoedemaeker, M., 2000. Driving behaviour with ACC and the acceptance by individual drivers. In: IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Proceedings, 2000 IEEE, pp. 506-509.
11. Hoffmann E.R., and Mortimer R.G. Drivers estimates of time to collision. Accident Analysis and Prevention 26 4 (1994) 511-520
12. Hoffmann E.R., and Mortimer R.G. Scaling of relative velocity between vehicles. Accident Analysis and Prevention 28 4 (1996) 415-421
13. Ioannou P.A., and Stefanovic M. Evaluation of ACC vehicles in mixed traffic: Lane change effects and sensitivity analysis. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems 6 1 (2005) 79-89
14. Kiefer R.J., LeBlanc D.J., and Flannagan C.A. Developing an inverse time-to-collision crash alert timing approach based on drivers' last-second braking and steering judgments. Accident Analysis and Prevention 37 2 (2005) 295-303
15. Lee J.D., and Moray N. Trust, self-confidence, and operators' adaptation to automation. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 40 (1994) 153-184
16. Lee J.D., and See K.A. Trust in technology: designing for appropriate reliance. Human Factors 46 1 (2004) 50-80
17. Lee, J.D., Hoffman, J.D., Hayes, E., 2004. Collision warning design to mitigate driver distraction. In: Proceedings of CHI. ACM, New York, pp. 65-72.
18. Lee, J.D., McGehee, D.V., Brown, T.L., Marshall, D.C. Effects of adaptive cruise control and alert modality on driver performance. Transportation Research Record, in press.
19. Lewandowsky S., Mundy M., and Tan G. The dynamics of trust: comparing humans to automation. Journal of Experimental Psychology-Applied 6 2 (2000) 104-123
20. Marsden G., McDonald M., and Brackstone M. Towards an understanding of adaptive cruise control. Transportation Research Part C-Emerging Technologies 9 1 (2001) 33-51
21. Nilsson, L., 1995. Safety effects of adaptive cruise control in critical traffic situations. In: Proceedings of the Second World Congress on Intelligent Transport Systems: 'Steps Forward', III (Yokohama: VERTIS), pp. 1254-1259.
22. Palmer, M.T., Abbott, K.H., 1994. Effects of expected-value information and display format on recognition of aircraft subsystem abnormalities: NASA Technical Paper 3395.
23. Parasuraman R., and Riley V. Humans and automation: use, misuse, disuse, abuse. Human Factors 39 2 (1997) 230-253
24. Parasuraman R., Molloy R., and Singh I. Performance consequences of automation-induced "complacency". International Journal of Aviation Psychology 3 1 (1993) 1-23
25. Parasuraman R., Hancock P.A., and Olofinboba O. Alarm effectiveness in driver-centred collision-warning systems. Ergonomics 40 3 (1997) 390-399
26. Rakha H., Hankey J., Patterson A., and Van Aerde M. Field evaluation of safety impacts of adaptive cruise control. Its Journal 6 3 (2001) 225-259
27. Reyes M.L., and Lee J.D. The influence of IVIS distractions on tactical and control levels of driving performance. Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society vol. 2 (2004), Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Santa Monica, CA 2369-2373
28. Riley V. Human use of automation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation (1994), University of Minnesota, Minneapolis
29. Rudin-Brown C.M., and Parker H.A. Behavioural adaptation to adaptive cruise control (ACC): implications for preventive strategies. Transportation Research Part F-Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 7 2 (2004) 59-76
30. Seppelt, B.D., Lees, M.N., Lee, J.D., 2005a. Driver distraction and reliance: Adaptive cruise control in the context of sensor reliability and algorithm limits. In: Proceedings of the Third International Driving Symposium on Human Factors in Driver Assessment, Training and Vehicle Design, 2005 Driving Assessment, pp. 255-261.
31. Seppelt, B.D., Lees, M.N., Lee, J.D., Stoner, H.A., Brown, M., Hoffman, J.D., 2005b. Integrating ecological interface design into the engineering design process for vehicles. Nissan Final Report Year 3, University of Iowa, Iowa City.
32. Singh I.L., Molloy R., and Parasuraman R. Automation-induced monitoring inefficiency: role of display location. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 46 1 (1997) 17-30
33. Stanton N.A., and Marsden P. From fly-by-wire to drive-by-wire: safety implications of automation in vehicles. Safety Science 24 1 (1996) 35-49
34. Stanton N.A., and Young M.S. Vehicle automation and driving performance. Ergonomics 41 7 (1998) 1014-1028
35. Stanton N.A., Young M., and McCaulder B. Drive-by-wire: the case of driver workload and reclaiming control with adaptive cruise control. Safety Science 27 2 (1997) 149-159
36. Stoner, H.A., Wiese, E.E., Lee, J.D., 2003. Applying ecological interface design to the driving domain: the results of an abstraction hierarchy analysis. In: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society 47th Annual Meeting.
37. Vicente K.J. Cognitive Work Analysis: Towards Safe, Productive, and Healthy Computer-based Work (1999), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ
38. Vicente K.J. Ecological interface design: progress and challenges. Human Factors 44 1 (2002) 62-78
39. Vicente K.J., and Rasmussen J. Ecological interface design: theoretical foundations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SCM-22 4 (1992) 589-606
40. Vogel K. A comparison of headway and time to collision as safety indicators. Accident Analysis & Prevention 35 (2003) 427-433
41. Wickens C.D. Engineering Psychology and Human Performance (1992), Harper Collins, New York, NY
42. Wickens C.D., Gempler K., and Morphew M.E. Workload and reliability of predictor displays in aircraft traffic avoidance. Transportation Human Factors 2 2 (2000) 99-126
43. Young M.S., and Stanton N.A. Taking the load off: investigations of how adaptive cruise control affects mental workload. Ergonomics 47 9 (2004) 1014-1035