Drivers anticipate lead-vehicle conflicts during automated longitudinal control: Sensory cues capture driver attention and promote appropriate and timely responses

Accident Analysis and Prevention

Volumn 97, Issue , 2016, Pages 206-219

  Morando, Alberto ^a   Victor, Trent ^a,b   Dozza, Marco ^a  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b VOLVO CAR CORPORATION   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Adaptive cruise control; Automation; Driver behavior; Forward collision warning; Glance analysis; Naturalistic driving

Indexed keywords

AUTOMATION; BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CRUISE CONTROL; LONGITUDINAL CONTROL; VEHICLES;

ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL (ACC); ANTICIPATORY MECHANISMS; DRIVER ATTENTION; DRIVER BEHAVIOR; FORWARD COLLISION WARNINGS; GLANCE ANALYSIS; NATURALISTIC DRIVING; RADAR INFORMATION;

ADAPTIVE CRUISE CONTROL;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; AUTOMATION; CAR DRIVING; CONFLICT; DECELERATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROTECTIVE EQUIPMENT; PSYCHOLOGY; REACTION TIME; SWEDEN; TELECOMMUNICATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ATTENTION; AUTOMATION; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); CUES; DECELERATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROTECTIVE DEVICES; RADAR; REACTION TIME; SWEDEN; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84987971231     PISSN: 00014575     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.aap.2016.08.025     Document Type: Article

References (47)

1. Boer, E.R., Car following from the driver's perspective. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2:4 (1999), 201–206.
2. Coelingh, E., Jakobsson, L., Lind, H., & Lindman, M., 2007. Collision warning with auto brake: a real-life safety perspective.
3. de Winter, J.C.F., Happee, R., Martens, M.H., Stanton, N.A., Effects of adaptive cruise control and highly automated driving on workload and situation awareness: a review of the empirical evidence. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 27 (2014), 196–217, 10.1016/j.trf.2014.06.016.
4. Dozza, M., Moeschlin, F., Léon-Cano, J., FOTware: a modular, customizable software for analysis of multiple-source field-operational-test data. Paper Presented at the Second International Symposium on Naturalistic Driving Research, 2010.
5. Endsley, M.R., Situation awareness global assessment technique (SAGAT). Paper Presented at the Aerospace and Electronics Conference, NAECON 1988., Proceedings of the IEEE 1988 National, 1988 1988, 23–27 May 1988.
6. Engström, J., Victor, T., Markkula, G., Attention selection and multitasking in everyday driving: a conceptual model. Victor, M.T.W., Lee, J.D., Regan, M.A., (eds.) Driver Distraction and Inattention: Advances in Research and Countermeasures, 2013, Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
7. Fancher, P., Ervin, R., Sayer, J., Hagan, M., Bogard, S., Bareket, Z., Haugen, J., 1998. Intelligent cruise control field operational test. Final report (DOT HS 808 849). Retrieved from http://www.nhtsa.gov/DOT/NHTSA/NRD/Multimedia/PDFs/Crash%20Avoidance/1998/icc1998.pdf.
8. Franconeri, S., Simons, D., Moving and looming stimuli capture attention. Percept. Psychophys. 65:7 (2003), 999–1010, 10.3758/BF03194829.
9. Hoffmann, E.R., Mortimer, R.G., Scaling of relative velocity between vehicles. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 1994.
10. Hoffmann, E.R., Mortimer, R.G., Drivers' estimates of time to collision. Accid. Anal. Prev. 26:4 (1994), 511–520.
11. Hoffmann, E.R., Detection of vehicle velocity changes in car following. Paper Presented at the Australian Road Research Board Conference Proc., 1968.
12. Janssen, W.H., 1974. The perception of manoeuvres of moving vehicles. Progress report VI (final report): Implications of psychophysical threshold measurements for the night driving situation. Retrieved from.
13. Jonides, J., Voluntary versus automatic control over the mind's eye's movement. Atten. Perform. IX 9 (1981), 187–203.
14. Kessler, C., Etemad, A., Alessandretti, G., Heinig, K., Brouwer, R., Cserpinszky, A., Benmimoun, M., 2012. EuroFOT Deliverable D11. 3 – Final Report. Retrieved from http://www.eurofot-ip.eu/.
15. Klauer, S.G., Dingus, T.A., Neale, V.L., Sudweeks, J.D., Ramsey, D.J., 2006. The impact of driver inattention on near-crash/crash risk: An analysis using the 100-car naturalistic driving study data. Retrieved from https://vtechworks.lib.vt.edu/bitstream/handle/10919/55090/DriverInattention.pdf?sequence=1.
16. Klein, R., Kingstone, A., Pontefract, A., Orienting of visual attention. Rayner, K., (eds.) Eye Movements and Visual Cognition, 1992, Springer New York, 46–65.
17. Lamble, D., Laakso, M., Summala, H., Detection thresholds in car following situations and peripheral vision: implications for positioning of visually demanding in-car displays. Ergonomics 42:6 (1999), 807–815.
18. Larsson, A.F.L., Kircher, K., Andersson Hultgren, J., Learning from experience: Familiarity with ACC and responding to a cut-in situation in automated driving. Transport. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 27 (2014), 229–237, 10.1016/j.trf.2014.05.008.
19. Lee, J.D., See, K.A., Trust in automation: designing for appropriate reliance. Hum. Factors 46:1 (2004), 50–80, 10.1518/hfes.46.1.50_30392.
20. Lee, J.D., McGehee, D., Brown, T., Marshall, D., Effects of adaptive cruise control and alert modality on driver performance. Transp. Res. Rec.: J. Transp. Res. Board (1980), 2006, 49–56.
21. Lee, J.D., McGehee, D.V., Brown, T.L., Nakamoto, J., Driver sensitivity to brake pulse duration and magnitude. Ergonomics 50:6 (2007), 828–836, 10.1080/00140130701223220.
22. Lee, D.N., A theory of visual control of braking based on information about time-to-collision. Perception 5:4 (1976), 437–459, 10.1068/p050437.
23. Lin, J.Y., Franconeri, S., Enns, J.T., Objects on a collision path with the observer demand attention. Psychol. Sci. 19:7 (2008), 686–692, 10.1111/j. 1467–9280.2008.02143.x.
24. Malta, L., Aust, M.L., Faber, F., Metz, B., Pierre, G.S., Benmimoun, M., Schäfer, R., 2011. EuroFOT Deliverable 6.4 – Final results: Impacts on traffic safety. Retrieved from http://www.eurofot-ip.eu/.
25. Markkula, G., Engström, J., Lodin, J., Bärgman, J., Victor, T., 2016. A farewell to brake reaction times? Kinematics-dependent brake response in naturalistic rear-end emergencies (Manuscript submitted for publication).
26. Michon, J.A., A Critical View of Driver Behavior Models: What Do We Know, What Should We Do? Human Behavior and Traffic Safety. 1985, Springer, 485–524.
27. Mortimer, R.G., Perceptual factors in rear-end crashes. Paper Presented at the Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 1990.
28. NHTSA, 2005. Automotive Collision Avoidance System Field Operational Test (ACAS FOT) −Final Program Report. Retrieved from http://www.nhtsa.gov/DOT/NHTSA/NRD/Multimedia/PDFs/Crash%20Avoidance/2005/ACAS%20FOT%20Final%20Program%20Report%20DOT%20HS%20809%20886.pdf.
29. NHTSA, 2015. US Department of Transportation Releases Policy on Automated Vehicle Development Retrieved from.
30. Nilsson, J., Strand, N., Falcone, P., Vinter, J. (2013, 24–27 June 2013). Driver performance in the presence of adaptive cruise control related failures: Implications for safety analysis and fault tolerance. Paper presented at the Dependable Systems and Networks Workshop (DSN-W), 2013 43rd Annual IEEE/IFIP Conference on.
31. OECD, 1990. Behavioural adaptations to changes in the road transport system (9264133895) Retrieved from.
32. Ranney, T.A., Models of driving behavior: a review of their evolution. Accid. Anal. Prev. 26:6 (1994), 733–750.
33. Regan, D., Vincent, A., Visual processing of looming and time to contact throughout the visual field. Vision Res. 35:13 (1995), 1845–1857.
34. Rudin-Brown, C.M., Parker, H.A., Behavioural adaptation to adaptive cruise control (ACC): implications for preventive strategies. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 7:2 (2004), 59–76, 10.1016/j.trf.2004.02.001.
35. SAE, J3016 – Taxonomy and Definitions for Terms Related to On-road Motor Vehicle Automated Driving Systems. 2014, SAE International.
36. Sanders, A.F., Expectancy: application and measurement. Acta Psychol. 25 (1966), 293–313, 10.1016/0001-6918(66)90013-8.
37. Shinar, D., Vision, Visual Attention, and Visual Search Traffic Safety and Human Behavior. 2007, Emerald, Inc., 91–123.
38. Stanton, N.A., Young, M., McCaulder, B., Drive-by-wire: the case of driver workload and reclaiming control with adaptive cruise control. Saf. Sci. 27:2 (1997), 149–159.
39. Strand, N., Nilsson, J., Karlsson, I.M., Nilsson, L., Semi-automated versus highly automated driving in critical situations caused by automation failures. Transp. Res. Part F: Traffic Psychol. Behav. 27 (2014), 218–228.
40. Summala, H., Lamble, D., Laakso, M., Driving experience and perception of the lead car's braking when looking at in-car targets. Accid. Anal. Prev. 30:4 (1998), 401–407, 10.1016/s0001-4575(98)00005-0.
41. Summala, H., Brake reaction times and driver behavior analysis. Transp. Hum. Factors 2:3 (2000), 217–226, 10.1207/sthf0203_2.
42. Summala, H., Towards Understanding Motivational and Emotional Factors in Driver Behaviour: Comfort Through Satisficing Modelling Driver Behaviour in Automotive Environments. 2007, Springer, 189–207.
43. Tivesten, E., Morando, A., Victor, T., The timecourse of driver visual attention in naturalistic driving with Adaptive Cruise Control and Forward Collision Warning. Paper Presented at the 4th International Driver Distraction and Inattention Conference, Sydney, New South Wales, 2015.
44. Victor, T.W., Engström, J., Harbluk, J.L., Distraction Assessment Methods Based on Visual Behavior and Event Detection Driver Distraction. 2008, CRC Press, 135–165.
45. Victor, T., Dozza, M., Bärgman, J., Boda, C.-N., Engström, J., Flannagan, C., Markkula, G., Analysis of Naturalistic Driving Study Data: Safer Glances, Driver Inattention and Crash Risk., 2015 Retrieved from http://www.trb.org/Publications/PubsSHRP2ResearchReportsSafety.aspx.
46. Wege, C., Will, S., Victor, T., Eye movement and brake reactions to real world brake-capacity forward collision warnings-a naturalistic driving study. Accid. Anal. Prev. 58 (2013), 259–270, 10.1016/j.aap.2012.09.013.
47. Young, M.S., Stanton, N.A., Back to the future: brake reaction times for manual and automated vehicles. Ergonomics 50:1 (2007), 46–58, 10.1080/00140130600980789.