The validity of driving simulation for assessing differences between in-vehicle informational interfaces: A comparison with field testing

Ergonomics

Volumn 53, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 404-420

  Wang, Ying ^a,b   Mehler, Bruce ^a   Reimer, Bryan ^a   Lammers, Vincent ^a   D'Ambrosio, Lisa A ^a   Coughlin, Joseph F ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^b TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Destination entry; Driving simulator; In vehicle information system; Validity; Visual attention

Indexed keywords

DRIVER BEHAVIOUR; DRIVER INTERACTION; DRIVING PERFORMANCE; DRIVING SIMULATION; DRIVING SIMULATOR; FIELD TESTING; FIXED-BASE SIMULATORS; IN-VEHICLE; IN-VEHICLE INFORMATION SYSTEM; INSTRUMENTED VEHICLE; ON-ROAD STUDIES; SIMULATION STUDIES; TOUCH SCREEN; USER ACCEPTANCE; VISUAL ATTENTION;

AUTOMOBILE DRIVERS; AUTOMOBILE SIMULATORS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; ROADS AND STREETS; USER INTERFACES; VEHICLES;

SIMULATORS;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CAR DRIVING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EYE MOVEMENT; FEMALE; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; SAFETY; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADULT; AUTOMOBILE DRIVING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DATA DISPLAY; EYE MOVEMENTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; SAFETY; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 77249134068     PISSN: 00140139     EISSN: 13665847     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00140130903464358     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bach, K.M., et al., 2008. Evaluating driver attention and driving behaviour: comparing controlled driving and simulated driving. In: Proceedings of the 22nd British HCI group annual conference on HCI 2008: People and computers XXII: Culture, creativity, interaction. Liverpool, UK: British Computer Society, 193-201.
2. Bittner, A.C., et al., 2002. On-road versus simulator data in driver model development - Driver performance model experience. Transportation Research Record, 1803, 38-44.
3. Blaauw, G.J., 1982. Driving experience and task demands in simulator and instrumented car: a validation study. Human Factors, 24 (2), 473-486.
4. Blana, E., 1996. Driving simulator validation studies: a literature review. Leeds, UK: University of Leeds.
5. Bullinger, H. and Dangelmaier, M., 2003. Virtual prototyping and testing of in-vehicle interfaces. Ergonomics, 46 (1-3), 41-51.
6. Decina, L.E., et al., 1996. Feasibility of new simulation technology to train novice drivers. No. HS-808 548. Washington, DC: National Highway traffic Safety Administration, US Department of Transportation.
7. Godley, S.T., Triggs, T.J., and Fildes, B.N., 2002. Driving simulator validation for speed research. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 34 (5), 589-600.
8. Green, P., 1997. Potential safety impacts of automotive navigation systems. In: Paper presented at the automotive land navigation conference, 18 June, Detroit, MI, USA.
9. Green, P., 2004. Driver distraction, telematics design, and workload managers: safety issues and solutions. SAE Paper 2004-21-0022. In: Proceedings of the 2004 international congress on transportation electronics (convergence 2004, SAE Publication P-387). Warrendale, PA: Society of Automotive Engineers, 165-180.
10. Hancock, P.A., Lesch, M., and Simmons, L., 2003. The distraction effects of phone use during a crucial driving maneuver. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 35 (4), 501-514.
11. Horrey, W.J. and Wickens, C.D., 2006. Examining the impact of cell phone conversations on driving using meta-analytic techniques. Human Factors, 48 (1), 196-205.
12. Hosking, S., Young, K., and Regan, M., 2007. The effects of text messaging on young novice driver performance. In: I.J. Faulks, M. Regan, M. Stevenson, J. Brown, A. Porter, and J.D. Irwin, eds. Distracted driving. Sydney: Australasian College of Road Safety, 155-187.
13. Hoskins, A.H. and El-Gindy, M., 2006. Technical report: literature survey on driving simulator validation studies. International Journal of Heavy Vehicle Systems, 13 (3), 241-252.
14. International Telecommunication Union, 2001. Arrangement of digits, letters and symbols on telephones and other devices that can be used for gaining access to a telephone network. No. E.161. Geneva: International Telecommunication Union.
15. Jamson, H. and Mouta, S., 2004. More bang for your buck? A cross-cost simulator evaluation study. In: Proceedings of driving simulation conference (DSC) Europe, Paris, France, 321-332.
16. Kaptein, N.A., Theeuwes, J., and van der Horst, R., 1996. Driving simulator validity: some considerations. Transportation Research Record, 1550, 30-36.
17. Kurokawa, K. and Wierwille, W.W., 1990. Validation of a driving simulation facility for instrument panel task performance. Paper presented at the Human Factors Society 34th annual meeting. Santa Monica, CA: HFES.
18. Lammers, V., 2007. The impact of input methods for in vehicle information systems on driving performance: an on-road study. Unpublished thesis. Cologne University of Applied Sciences.
19. Lee, H.C., Cameron, D., and Lee, A.H., 2003. Assessing the driving performance of older adult drivers: on-road versus simulated driving. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 35 (5), 797-803.
20. Liu, Y. and Wen, M., 2004. Comparison of head-up display (HUD)vs.head-downdisplay(HDD):drivingperformance of commercial vehicle operator in Taiwan. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 61 (5), 679-697.
21. McAvoy, D.S., Schattler, K.L., and Datta, T.K., 2007. Driving simulator validation, for nighttime construction work zone devices. Transportation Research Record, 2015, 55-96.
22. McRuer, D.T.K., 1975. Comparison of driver dynamics with actual and simulated visual displays. Paper No 173. Hawthorne: Systems Technology, Inc.
23. Mehler, B., et al., 2009. The impact of incremental increases in cognitive workload on physiological arousal and performance in young adult drivers. Transportation Research Record, 2138, 6-12.
24. Pinto, M., Cavallo, V., and Ohlmann, T., 2008. The development of driving simulator: toward a multisensory solution. Le Travail Humain, 71 (1), 62-95.
25. Reed, M.P. and Green, P.A., 1999. Comparison of driving performance on-road and in a low-cost simulator using a concurrent telephone dialling task. Ergonomics, 42 (8), 1015-1037.
26. Reimer, B., 2009. Cognitive task complexity and the impact on drivers' visual tunneling. Transportation Research Record, 2138, 13-19.
27. Reimer, B., et al., 2006. Using self-reported data to assess the validity of driving simulation data. Behavior Research Methods, 38 (2), 314-324.
28. Reimer, B., et al., 2009a. An on-road assessment of the impact of cognitive workload on physiological arousal in young adult drivers. In: Proceedings of the 1st international conference on automotive user interfaces and interactive vehicular applications (AutomotiveUI 2009), Essen, Germany, 115-118.
29. Reimer, B., et al., 2009b. A comparison of three manual destination entry methods on their impact on visual attention and driving performance: an on-road evaluation. In: Proceedings of the 53rd annual meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, San Antonio, TX. Santa Monica, CA; HFES.
30. Salaani, M.K., Heydinger, G.J., and Guenther, D.A., 1997. Validation results from using nadsdyna vehicle dynamics simulation. SAE Transactions, 106 (6), 919-928.
31. Salvucci, D. and Goldberg, J., 2000. Identifying fixations and saccades in eye-tracking protocols. In: A. Duchowski, ed. ETRA 2000 - Proceedings of the eye tracking research and applications symposium, 6-8 November, Palm Beach Gardens, FL, 71-78. Available online at: http://delivery.acm.org/10.1145/360000/355028/p71-salvucci. pdf?key1=355028&key2=4573302621&coll=GUIDE&d1=GUIDE&CFID=70115423&CFTOKEN=148359.
32. Santos, J., et al., 2005. The interaction between driving and in-vehicle information systems: comparison of results from laboratory, simulator and real-world studies. Transportation Research Part F, 8 (2), 135-146.
33. Sodhi, M., Reimer, B., and Llamazares, I., 2002. Glance analysis of driver eye movements to evaluate distraction. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 34 (4),529-538.
34. Spence, C. and Ho, C., 2008. Multisensory interface design for drivers: past, present and future. Ergonomics, 51 (1), 65-70.
35. Tijerina, L., et al., 2000. Driver distraction with route guidance systems. Technical report. DOT HS 809-069. Washington, DC: US Department of Transportation.
36. Tsimhoni, O., Smith, D., and Green, P., 2004. Address entry while driving: speech recognition versus a touch-screen keyboard. Human Factors, 46 (4), 600-610.
37. van Winsum, W., de Waard, D., and Brookhuis, K.A., 1999. Lane change manoeuvres and safety margins. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 2 (3), 139-149.
38. Victor, T.W., Harbluk, J.L., and Engstrom, J.A., 2005. Sensitivity of eye-movement measures to in-task difficulty. Transportation Research Part F, 8, 167-190.
39. Wikipedia, undated. List of the most common US place names [online]. Available from: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ List_of_the_most_common_U.S._place_names [Accessed 3 May 2007].
40. Wierwille, W.W., 1993. Visual and manual demands of in-car controls and displays. In: B. Peacock and W. Karwowski, eds. Automotive ergonomics. Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis, 299-320.