Design and analysis of semi-controlled studies

Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour

Volumn 46, Issue , 2017, Pages 404-412

  Kircher, Katja ^a   Eriksson, Olle ^a   Forsman, Åsa ^a   Vadeby, Anna ^a   Ahlstrom, Christer ^a  

^a SWEDISH NATIONAL ROAD AND TRANSPORT RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Driver behaviour; Experimental design; Operational indicators; Semi controlled study; Statistical analysis; Tactical indicators

Indexed keywords

DESIGN; DESIGN OF EXPERIMENTS; STATISTICAL METHODS; STATISTICS;

CONTROLLED EXPERIMENT; DRIVER BEHAVIOUR; GEOGRAPHICAL LOCATIONS; INCREASED FLEXIBILITY; NATURALISTIC DRIVING STUDIES; OPERATIONAL INDICATOR; OPERATIONAL VARIABLES; SEMI-CONTROLLED STUDY;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 84978795126     PISSN: 13698478     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.trf.2016.06.016     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Ahlstrom, C., Kircher, K., Thorslund, B., Adell, E., Bicyclists’ visual strategies when conducting self-paced vs. system-paced smartphone tasks in traffic. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 41 (2016), 204–216, 10.1016/j.trf.2015.01.010.
2. Campbell, D.T., Factors relevant to the validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin 54:4 (1957), 297–312.
3. Carsten, O., Kircher, K., Jamson, S., Vehicle-based studies of driving in the real world: The hard truth?. Accident Analysis & Prevention 58 (2013), 162–174, 10.1016/j.aap.2013.06.006.
4. Dingus, T.A., Klauer, S.G., Neale, V.L., Petersen, A., Lee, S.E., Sudweeks, J., Knipling, R.R., The 100-car naturalistic driving study. Phase II – Results of the 100-car field experiment. 2006, NHTSA, Washington, DC pp. 352.
5. Dozza, M., Bärgman, J., Lee, J.D., Chunking: A procedure to improve naturalistic data analysis. Accident Analysis & Prevention 58 (2013), 309–317, 10.1016/j.aap.2012.03.020.
6. Elmes, D.G., Kantowitz, B.H., Roediger, H.L., Research methods in psychology. 9th ed., 2011, Cengate Learning Custom Publishing, Wadsworth.
7. Eriksson, A., Lindström, A., Seward, A., Seward, A., & Kircher, K. (2014). Can user-paced, menu-free spoken language interfaces improve dual task handling while driving? Paper presented at the Human Computer Interaction International, Creta Maris, Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
8. Hickman, J.S., Hanowski, R.J., An assessment of commercial motor vehicle driver distraction using naturalistic driving data. Traffic Injury Prevention 13:6 (2012), 612–619, 10.1080/15389588.2012.683841.
9. Kang, T.-P., Lin, B.T.-W., Green, P.A., Miller, S., Comastro, K., Evaluation of a prototype head-orientation-based distraction warning system. 2014, UMTRI, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
10. Kircher, K., Ahlstrom, C., Palmqvist, L., Adell, E., Bicyclists‘ speed adaptation strategies when conducting self-paced vs. system-paced smartphone tasks in traffic. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour 28 (2015), 55–64, 10.1016/j.trf.2014.11.006.
11. Kircher, K., Lindström, A., Seward, A., Hinder- och incidentrapportering i trafiken med tal respektive text – en simulatorstudie. 2014, Linköping & Stockholm.
12. Michon, J.A., A critical view of driver behavior models. What do we know, what should we do?. Evans, L., Schwing, R., (eds.) Human behavior and traffic safety, 1985, Plenum Press, New York.
13. van Schagen, I., Sagberg, F., The potential benefits of naturalistic driving for road safety research: Theoretical and empirical considerations and challenges for the future. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 48 (2012), 692–701, 10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.06.1047.