Effect of replacing soybean meal by raw or extruded pea seeds on growth performance and selected physiological parameters of the ileum and distal colon of pigs

PLoS ONE

Volumn 12, Issue 1, 2017, Pages

  Tuśnio, Anna ^a   Taciak, Marcin ^a   Barszcz, Marcin ^a   Świȩch, Ewa ^a   Bachanek, Ilona ^a   Skomiał, Jacek ^a  

^a KIELANOWSKI INSTITUTE OF ANIMAL PHYSIOLOGY AND NUTRITION   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BETA GLUCOSIDASE; BETA GLUCURONIDASE; BUTYRIC ACID; AMINE; PLANT MEDICINAL PRODUCT;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL COLONIZATION; BODY WEIGHT; CHEMICAL COMPOSITION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DESCENDING COLON; DIETARY INTAKE; ENZYME ACTIVITY; GROWTH RATE; HISTOLOGY; ILEUM; MALE; MICROBIAL ACTIVITY; NITROGEN BALANCE; NONHUMAN; NUTRITIONAL VALUE; PEA; PH MEASUREMENT; PHYSIOLOGICAL PROCESS; PIG; PROTEIN METABOLISM; SOYBEAN; WEIGHT GAIN; ANIMAL; ANIMAL FOOD; CHEMISTRY; COLON; INTESTINE FLORA; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; PLANT SEED;

AMINES; ANIMAL FEED; ANIMAL NUTRITIONAL PHYSIOLOGICAL PHENOMENA; ANIMALS; COLON; GASTROINTESTINAL MICROBIOME; ILEUM; PEAS; PHYTOCHEMICALS; SEEDS; SOYBEANS; SWINE;

EID: 85009136711     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0169467     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Alonso R, Aguire A, Marzo F. Effects of extrusion and traditional processing methods on antinutrients and in vitro digestibility of protein and starch in faba and kidney beans. Food Chem. 2000; 68(2):159-165.
2. Collins CL, Eason PJ, Dunshea FR, Higgins TJV, King RH. Starch but not protein digestibility is altered in pigs fed transgenic peas containing α-amylase inhibitor. J Sci Food Agric. 2006; 86:1894-1899.
3. Gatel F, Grosjean F. Composition and nutritive value of peas for pigs: a review of European results. Livest Prod Sci. 1990; 26(3):155-175.
4. Gatel F. Protein quality of legume seeds for non-ruminant animals: a literature review. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1994; 45:317-348.
5. Mekbugwan A. Application of tropical legumes for pig feed. Anim Sci J. 2007; 78:342-350.
6. Partanen K, Alaviuhkola T, Siljander-Rasi H, Suomi K. Faba beans in diets for growing-finishing pigs. Agric Food Sci. 2003; 12:35-47.
7. Stein HH, Benzoni G, Bohlke RA, Peters DN. Assessment of the feeding value of South Dakota-grown peas (Pisum sativum L.) for growing pigs. J Anim Sci. 2004; 82:2568-2578. PMID: 15446472
8. Zraly Z, Pisarikova B, Trckova M, Herzig I, Juzl M, Simeonovova J. The effect of white lupine on the performance, health, carcass characteristics and meat quality of market pigs. Vet Med. 2007; 52:29-41.
9. Palander S, Laurinen P, Perttilä S, Valaja J, Partanen K. Protein and amino acid digestibility and metabolizable energy value of pea (Pisum sativum), faba bean (Vicia faba) and lupin (Lupinus angustifolius) seeds for turkeys of different age. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2006; 127(1-2):89-100.
10. Masey O'Neil HV, Rademacherb M, Mueller-Harveyc I, Stringanoc E, Kightleyd S, Wiseman J. Standardised ileal digestibility of crude protein and amino acids of UK-grown peas and faba beans by broilers. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2012; 175:158-167.
11. Alonso R, Orue E, Marzo F. Effects of extrusion and conventional processing methods on protein and antinutritional factor contents in pea seeds. Food Chem. 1998; 63(4):505-512.
12. Salgado P, Freire JPB, Mourato M, Cabral F, Toullec R, Lallès JP. Comparative effects of different legume protein sources in weaned piglets: nutrient digestibility, intestinal morphology and digestive enzymes. Livest Prod Sci. 2002; 74(2):191-202.
13. Jansman AJM. Tannins in feedstuffs for simple stomached animals. Nutr Res Rev. 1993; 6:209-236. doi: 10.1079/NRR19930013 PMID: 19094309
14. Lallés JP, Jansman AJM. Recent progress in the understanding of the mode of action and effects of antinutritional factors from legume seeds in non-ruminant farm animals. In: Jansman A.J.M., Hill G.D., Huisman J., van der Poel A.F.B. (Eds.), Recent Advances of Research in Antinutritional Factors in Legume Seeds and Rapseed. Centre for Agricultural Publishing and Documentation (PUDOC), Wageningen. 1998; pp.219-232.
15. Huisman J, Tolman GH. Antinutritional factors in the plant proteins of diets for non-ruminants. In: Garnsworthy P.C., Wiseman J. (Eds.), Recent Developments in Pig Nutrition, vol. 3. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham. 2001; pp. 261-322.
16. Ortiz LT, Alzueta C, Trevino J, Castano M. Effects of faba bean tannins on the growth and histological structure of the intestinal tract and liver of chicks and rats. Brit Poult Sci. 1994; 35(5):743-754.
17. Mul AJ, Perry FG. The role of fructo-oligosaccharides in animal nutrition. In: Garnsworthy P.C., Cole D. J.A. (Eds.), Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition. Nottingham University Press, Nottingham. 1994; pp. 57-79.
18. Delzenne NM, Roberfroid MR. Physiological effects of non-digestible oligosaccharides. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 1994; 27(1):1-6.
19. Tosh SM, Yada S. Dietary fibres in pulse seeds and fractions: Characterization, functional attributes, and applications. Food Res Int. 2010; 43(2):450-460.
20. Topping DL, Clifton PM. Short-chain fatty acids and human colonic function: roles of resistant starch and nonstarch polysaccharides. Physiol rev. 2001; 81(3):1031-1064. PMID: 11427691
21. Scheppach W. Effects of short chain fatty acids on gut morphology and function. Gut. 1994;suppl.1:35- 38.
22. Pryde SE, Duncan SH, Hold GL, Stewart CS, Flint HJ. The microbiology of butyrate formation in the human colon. Microbiol Lett. 2002; 217:133-139.
23. Hamer HM, Jonkers D, Venema K, Vanhoutvin S, Troost FJ, Brummer RJ. Review article: the role of butyrate on colonic function. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2008; 27:104-119. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036. 2007.03562.x PMID: 17973645
24. Almeida NG, Calderon de la Barca AM, Valencia ME. Effect of different heat treatments on the antinutritional activity of Phaseolus vulgaris (variety Ojo de Cabra) lectin. J Agric Food Chem. 1991; 39 (9):1627-1630.
25. Gujska E, Khan K. Feed moisture effects on functional properties, trypsin inhibitor and hemagglutinating activities of extruded bean high starch fractions. J Food Sci. 1991; 56:443-447.
26. Bishnoi S, Khetarpaul N. Saponin content and trypsin inhibitor of pea cultivars: effect of domestic processing and cooking methods. J Food Sci Technol. 1994; 31:73-76.
27. Frías J, Díaz-Pollan C, Hedley CL, Vidal-Valverde C. Evolution of trypsin inhibitor activity during germination of lentils. J Agric Food Chem. 1995; 43:2231-2234.
28. Bau HM, Villaume C, Nicolas JP, Méjean L. Effect of germination on chemical composition, biochemical constituents and antinutritional factors of soya bean (Glycine max) seeds. J Sci Food Agric. 1997; 73:1- 9.
29. Wang N, Lewis MJ, Brennan JG, Westby A. Effect of processing methods on nutrients and anti-nutritional factors in cowpea. Food Chem. 1997; 58:59-68.
30. Huisman J, Jansamn AJM. Dietary effects and some analytical aspects of antinutritional factors in peas (Pisum sativum), common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) and soyabeans (Glycine max L.) in monogastric animals. A literature review. Nutr Abstr Rev. Ser. B. 1991; 61:901-921.
31. Grosjean F, Barrier-Guillot B, Bastianelli D, Rudeaux F, Bourdillon A, Peyronnet C. Feeding value of three categories of pea (Pisum sativum L.) for poultry. Anim Sci. 1999; 69:591-599.
32. Gdala J, Buraczewska L, Grala W. The chemical composition of different types and varieties of pea and the digestion of their protein in pigs. J Anim Feed Sci. 1992; 1:71-79.
33. Jezierny D, Mosenthin R, Bauer E. The use of grain legumes as a protein source in pig nutrition: A review. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2010; 157:111-128.
34. NRC. Nutrient Requirements of Swine. 11th Edition. The National Academy Press. 2012. Washington, DC.
35. Nutrient Requirements and Nutritional Value of Feeds for Swine (in Polish). 2nd Edition. Grela ER, Skomiał J (Editors). 2015. The Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, PAS, Jab?onna (Poland).
36. Rademacher M, Sauer WC, Jansman AJM. Standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids in pigs. 1999. The New System, Degussa-Hülls.
37. AOAC. Association of Official Analytical Chemists. Official methods of analysis of AOAC. 2000. 17th ed. Washington, DC: Association of Official Analytical Chemists.
38. Jerumianis J. U″ber die Verönderung der Polyphenole in Verlauf des Mälzens und Maischens. Brauwissenschaft. 1979; 25:313-322.
39. Adams CA, Novellie K. Composition and structure of protein bodies and spherosomes isolated from ungerminated seeds of sorghum bicolor (Linn.). Moench Plant Physiol. 1975; 55:1-6. PMID: 16659009
40. Kakade MC, Rackis JJ, McGhee JE, Pluski G. Determination of trypsin inhibitor activity of soy products: collaborative analysis of an improved procedure. Cereal Chem. 1974; 51:376-382.
41. Boisen S, Fernandez JA. Prediction of the apparent ileal digestibility of protein and amino acids and in feedstuffs and feed mixtures for pigs by in vitro analyses. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 1995; 51:29-43.
42. Boisen S, Moughan PJ. Different expressions of dietary protein and amino acid digestibility in pig feeds and their application in protein evaluation: A theoretical approach. Acta Agric Scandinavica. Sect. A- Anim Sci. 1996; 46(3):165-172.
43. Barszcz M, Taciak M, Skomiał J. A dose-response effects of tannic acid and protein on growth performance, caecal fermentation, colon morphology, and β-glucuronidase activity of rats. J Anim Feed Sci. 2011; 20:613-625.
44. Taciak M, Barszcz M, Tuśnio A, Bachanek I, Pastuszewska B, Skomiał J. The effects of type of protein and fibre fermented in vitro with different pig inocula on short-chain fatty acids and amines concentrations. J Anim Feed Sci. 2015; 24:235-243.
45. Zhu XY, Zhong T, Pandya Y, Joerger RD. 16S rRNA-based analysis of microbiota from the cecum of broiler chickens. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002; 68:124-137. doi: 10.1128/AEM.68.1.124-137.2002 PMID: 11772618
46. Barszcz M, Taciak M, Skomiał J. The effects of inulin, dried Jerusalem artichoke tuber and a multispecies probiotic preparation on microbiota ecology and immune ststus of the large intestine in young pigs. Arch Anim Nutr. 2016; 70(4):278-292. doi: 10.1080/1745039X.2016.1184368 PMID: 27216555
47. Tako E, Glahn RP, Welch RM, Lei X, Yasuda K, Miller DD. Dietary inulin affects the expression of intestinal enterocyte iron transporters, receptors and storage protein and alters the microbiota in the pig intestine. Brit J Nutr. 2008; 99:472-480. doi: 10.1017/S0007114507825128 PMID: 17868492
48. Amit-Romach E, Sklan D, Uni Z. Microflora ecology of the chicken intestine using 16S ribosomal DNA primers. Poult Sci. 2004; 83:1093-1098. PMID: 15285498
49. Wang RF, Cao WW, Cerniglia CE. PCR detection and quantitation of predominant anaerobic bacteria in human and animal fecal samples. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1996; 62:1242-1247. PMID: 8919784
50. Kaufmann P., Pfefferkorn A, Teuber M, Meile L. Identification and quantification of Bifidobacterium species isolated from food with genus-specific 16S rRNA-targeted probes by colony hybridization and PCR. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997; 63:1268-1273. PMID: 9097423
51. Tsen HY, Lin CK, Chi WR. Development and use of 16S rRNA gene targeted PCR primers for the identification of Escherichia coli cells in water. J Appl Microbiol. 1998; 85:554-560. PMID: 9750286
52. Smulikowska S, Pastuszewska B, Swiech E, Ochtabinska A, Mieczkowska A, Nguyen VC, et al. Tannin content affects negatively nutritive value of pea for monogastrics. J Anim Feed Sci. 2001; 10:511-523.
53. Konieczka P, Smulikowska S, Czerwiński J, Mieczkowska A. Raw vs extruded coloured-flower pea as an ingredient in broiler diets: effects on performance, ileal digestibility, gut morphology, and intestinal microbiota activity. J Anim Feed Sci. 2014; 23(3):244-252.
54. Pacheco WJ, Stark CR, Ferket PR, Brake J. Effects of trypsin inhibitor and particle size of expellerextracted soybean meal on broiler live performance and weight of gizzard and pancreas. Poult Sci. 2014; 93(9):2245-2252. doi: 10.3382/ps.2014-03986 PMID: 25071228
55. Jondreville C, Grosjean F, Buron G, Peyronnet C, Beneytout JL. Comparison of four pea varieties in pig feeding through digestibility and growth performance results. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition. 1992; 68(3):113-122.
56. Valdebouze P, Bergeron E, Gaborit T, Delort-Laval J. Content and distribution of trypsin inhibitors and hemagglutinins in some legume seeds. Canadian J Plant Sci. 1980; 60(2):695-701.
57. Leterme P, Beckers Y, Théwis A. Inter and intravarietal variability of the trypsin inhibitors contents of peas and his influence on apparent digestibility of crude proteins by growing pigs. In: Huisman J., van der Poel A.F.B., Liener I.E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the first International Workshop on Antinutritional Factors (ANF) in Legume Seeds, Recent Advances of Research in Antinutritional Factors in Legume Seeds. Wageningen, EAAP. 1989; pp. 121-125.
58. Carré B, Conan L. Relationship between trypsin inhibitor content of pea seeds and pea protein digestibility in poultry. In: Huisman J., van der Poel A.F.B., Liener I.E. (Eds.), Proceedings of the first International Workshop on Antinutritional Factors (ANF) in Legume Seeds, Recent advances of Research in Antinutritional Factors in Legume Seeds. Wageningen, EAAP. 1989; pp. 103-106.
59. Voragen AGJ, Gruppen H, Marsman GJP, Mul AJ. Effect of some manufacturing technologies on chemical, physical and nutritional properties of feed. In: Garnsworthy P.C., Cole D.J.A. (Eds.), Recent Advances in Animal Nutrition, Nottingham University Press. 1995; pp. 93-126.
60. Alonso A, Grant G, Dewey P, Marzo F. Nutritional assessment in vitro and in vivo of raw and extruded peas (P. sativum L.). J Agric Food Chem. 2000; 48:2286-2290. PMID: 10888538
61. El-Hady EAA, Habiba RA. Effect of soaking and extrusion conditions on antinutrients and protein digestibility of legume seeds. LWT Food Sci Technol. 2003; 36:285-293.
62. Diaz D, Morlacchini M, Masoero F, Moschini M, Fusconi G, Piva G. Pea seeds (Pisum sativum), faba beans (Vicia faba var. minor) and lupin seeds (Lupinus albus var. multitalia)as protein sources in broiler diets. Effect of extrusion on growth performance. Ital J Anim Sci. 2006; 5:43-53.
63. Li DF, Nelssen JL, Reddy PG, Blecha F, Hancock JD, Alle GL, et al. Transient hypersensitivity to soybean meal in the early-weaned pig. J Anim Sci. 1990; 68:1790-1799. PMID: 2384373
64. van Leeuwen P, Koninkx JFJL, Jansman AJM, Mouwen JMVM. Effects of condensed tannins in hulls of faba beans (Vicia faba L.) on some morphological and functional parameters of the small intestinal mucosaof piglets. In: van der Poel A.F.B., Huisman J., Saini H.S. (Eds.), Recent advances of research in antinutritional factors in legume seeds. Wageningen. EAAP. 1993; 70:335-339.
65. Hidaka H, Eida T, Takizawa T, Tokunaga T, Tashiro Y. Effects of fructooligosaccharides on intestinal flora and human health. Bifidobacteria Microflora. 1986; 5(1):37-50.
66. Mallillin AC, Trinidad TP, Raterta R, Dagbay K, Loyola AS. Dietary fibre and fermentability characteristics of root crops and legumes. Brit J Nutr. 2008; 100(03):485-488.
67. Cummings JH, Bingham SA. Dietary fibre, fermentation and large bowel cancer. Cancer surveys. 1986; 6(4):601-621.
68. Jha R, Leterme P. Feed ingredients differing in fermentable fibre and indigestible protein content affect fermentation metabolites and faecal nitrogen excretion in growing pigs. Animal. 2012; 6:603-611. doi: 10.1017/S1751731111001844 PMID: 22436276
69. Cherrington CA, Hinton M, Pearson GR, Chopra I. Short-chain organic acids at pH 5.0 kill Escherichia coli and Salmonella spp. without causing membrane perturbation. J Appl Bacteriol. 1991; 70(2):161-165. PMID: 1902205
70. Duncan SH, Louis P, Thomson JM, Flint HJ. The role of pH in determining the species composition of the human colonic microbiota. Environ Microbiol. 2009; 11(8):2112-2122. doi: 10.1111/j.1462-2920. 2009.01931.x PMID: 19397676
71. Shim SB, Verdonk JMAJ, Pellikaan WF, Verstegen MWA. Differences in microbial activities of faeces from weaned and unweaned pigs in relation to in vitro fermentation of different sources of inulin-type oligofructose and pig feed ingredients. Asian-Aust. J. Anim. Sci. 2007; 20:1444-1452.
72. Molist F, de Segura AG, Gasa J, Hermes RG, Manzanilla EG, Anguita M, et al. Effects of the insoluble and soluble dietary fibre on the physicochemical properties of digesta and the microbial activity in early weaned piglets. Anim Feed Sci Technol. 2009; 149(3):346-353.
73. Windey K, De Preter V, Verbeke K. Relevance of protein fermentation to gut health. Mol Nutr Food Res. 2012; 56:184-196. doi: 10.1002/mnfr.201100542 PMID: 22121108
74. Walker AF, Kochhar N. Effect of processing including domestic cooking on nutritional quality of legumes. Proc Nutr Soc. 1982; 41:41-51.
75. Oberreuther-Moschner DL, Rechkemmer G, Pool-Zobel BL. Basal colon crypt cells are more sensitive than surface cells toward hydrogen peroxide, a factor of oxidative stress. Toxicol Lett. 2005; 159:212-218. doi: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2005.05.008 PMID: 15979256
76. Desrouillères K, Millette M, Vu KD, Touja R, Lacroix M. Cancer preventive effects of a specific probiotic fermented milk containing Lactobacillus acidophilus CL1285, L. casei LBC80R and L. rhamnosus CLR2 on male F344 rats treated with 1, 2-dimethylhydrazine. J Func Foods. 2015; 17:816-827.
77. Cummings JH, Hill MJ, Bone ES, Branch WJ, Jenkins DJ. The effect of meat protein and dietary fiber on colonic function and metabolism. II. Bacterial metabolites in feces and urine. Am J Clin Nutr. 1979; 32(10):2094-2101. PMID: 484528
78. Hughes R, Magee EAM, Bingham S. Protein degradation in the large intestine: relevance to colorectal cancer. Curr Issues Intest Microbiol. 2000; 1:51-58. PMID: 11709869
79. Rist VTS, Weiss E, Eklund M, Mosenthin R. Impact of dietary protein on microbiota composition and activity in the gastrointestinal tract of piglets in relation to gut health: a review. Animal. 2013; 7:1067-1078. doi: 10.1017/S1751731113000062 PMID: 23410993
80. Allison C, Macfarlane G T. Influence of pH, nutrient availability, and growth rate on amine production by Bacteroides fragilis and Clostridium perfringens. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1989; 55(11):2894-2898. PMID: 2560361