Raw vs extruded coloured-flower pea as an ingredient in broiler diets: Effects on performance, ileal digestibility, gut morphology, and intestinal microbiota activity

Journal of Animal and Feed Sciences

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 244-252

  Konieczka, P ^a   Smulikowska, S ^a   Czerwinski J ^a   Mieczkowska, A ^a  

^a KIELANOWSKI INSTITUTE OF ANIMAL PHYSIOLOGY AND NUTRITION   (Poland)

Author keywords

Broiler chicken; Extrusion; Ileal digestibility; Pea; Short chain fatty acids; Tannins; Trypsin inhibitors

Indexed keywords

AVES; GALLUS GALLUS; PISUM SATIVUM;

EID: 84937109941     PISSN: 12301388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.22358/jafs/65687/2014     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Adams C.A., Novellie K., 1975. Composition and structure of protein bodies and spherosomes isolated from ungerminated seeds of sorghum bicolor (Linn.). Moench. Plant Physiol. 55, 1-6
2. Alonso R., Grant G., Devey P., Marzo F., 2000. Nutritional assessment in vitro and in vivo of raw and extruded peas (Pisum sativum L.). J. Agr. Food Chem. 48, 2286-2290
3. AOAC, 1990. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Official Methods of Analysis. 15th Edition. Washington, DC
4. Barszcz M., Taciak M., Skomiał J., 2011. A dose-response effects of tannic acid and protein on growth performance, caecal fermentation, colon morphology, and β-glucuronidase activity of rats. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 20, 613-625
5. Carré B., Beaufils E., Melcion J.P., 1991. Evaluation of protein and starch digestibilities and energy value of pelleted or unpelleted pea seeds from winter or spring cultivars in adult and young chickens. J. Agr. Food Chem. 39, 468-472
6. Castell A.G., Guenter W., Igbasan F.A., 1996. Nutritive value of peas for nonruminant diets. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 60, 209-227
7. Czerwinski J., Højberg O., Smulikowska S., Engberg R.M., Mieczkowska A., 2010. Influence of dietary peas and organic acids and probiotic supplementation on performance and caecal microbial ecology of broiler chickens. Brit. Poultry Sci. 51, 258-269
8. Diaz D., Morlacchini M., Masoero F., Moschini M., Fusconi G., Piva G., 2006. Pea seeds (Pisum sativum), faba beans (Vicia faba var. minor) and lupin seeds (Lupinus albus var. multitalia) as protein sources in broiler diets: effect of extrusion on growth performance. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 5, 23-53
9. Gdala J., Buraczewska L., Grala W., 1992. The chemical composition of different types and varietes of pea and the digestion of their protein in pigs. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 1, 71-79
10. Grosjean F., Barrier-Guillot B., Bastianelli D., Rudeaux F., Bourdillon A., Peyronnet C., 1999. Feeding value of three categories of pea (Pisum sativum L.) for poultry. Anim. Sci. 69, 591-599
11. Huisman J., Jansman A.J.M., 1991. Dietary effects and some analytical aspects of antinutritional factors in peas (Pisum sativum), common beans (Phaseolus vulgaris) and soyabeans (Glycine max L.) in monogastric farm animals. A literature review. Nutr. Abstr. Rev. Ser. B 61, 901-921
12. Jerumanis J., 1972. Über die Verönderung der Polyphenole in Verlauf des Mälzens und Maischens. Brauwissenschsft 25, 313-322
13. Kakade M.C., Rackis J.J., McGhee J.E., Puski G., 1974. Determination of trypsin inhibitor activity of soy products: collaborative analysis of an improved procedure. Cereal Chem. 51, 376-382
14. Kluth H., 2011. Relationship between feed particle size and digestibility of nutrients in poultry (in Germany). Proc. Soc. Nutr. Physiol. 20, 157-161
15. Leontowicz H., Leontowicz M., Kostyra H., Kulasek G., Gralak M.A., Krzemiński R., Podgurniak M., 2001. Effects of raw or extruded legume seeds on some functional and morphological gut parameters in rats. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 10, 169-183
16. Lue S., Hsieh F., Huff F., 1991. Extrusion cooking of maize meal and sugar beet fibre: effects of expansion properties, starch gelatinization and dietary fibre content. Cereal Chem. 68, 227-234
17. Nagaraj M.C.A., Wilson P., Hess J.B., Biligli S.F., 2007. Effect of high protein and all vegetable diets on the incidence and severity of pododermatitis in broiler chickens. J. Appl. Poultry Res. 16, 304-312
18. Nalle C.L., Ravindran G., Ravindran V., 2011. Extrusion of peas (Pisum sativum L.): Effects on the apparent metabolisable energy and ileal nutrient digestibility of broilers. Amer. J. Anim. Vet. Sci. 6, 25-30
19. Short F.J., Gorton P., Wiseman J., Boorman K.N., 1996. Determination of titanium dioxide added as an inert marker in chicken digestibility studies. Anim. Feed Sci. Tech. 59, 215-221
20. Smulikowska S., Pastuszewska B., ͆wiech E., Ochtabińska A., Mieczkowska A., Nguyen V.C., Buraczewska L., 2001. Tannin content affects negatively nutritive value of pea for monogastrics. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 10, 511-523
21. Smulikowska S., Rutkowski A. (Editors), 2005. Recommended Allowances and Nutritive Value of Feedstuffs-Poultry Feeding Standards (in Polish). 5th Edition, The Kielanowski Institute of Animal Physiology and Nutrition, PAS, Jabłonna (Poland)
22. STATGRAPHICS®, 1982-2010.Centurion XVI ver.16.1.03. Statistical Graphic System by Statistical Graphic Corporation
23. Szczurek W., 2009. Standardized ileal digestibility of amino acids from several cereal grains and protein-rich feedstuffs in broiler chickens at the age of 30 days. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 18, 662-676
24. van der Poel A.F.B., 1992. Twin-screw extrusion of two pea varieties: Effects of temperature and moisture level on antinutitional factors and protein dispersibility. J. Sci. Food Agric. 58, 83-87
25. Zduńczyk Z., Godycka I., Amarowicz R., 1997. Chemical composition and content of antinutritional factors in Polish cultivars of peas. Plant Food Hum. Nutr. 50, 37-45