Renewable energy and biodiversity: Implications for transitioning to a Green Economy

Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews

Volumn 70, Issue , 2017, Pages 161-184

  Gasparatos, Alexandros ^a   Doll, Christopher N H ^b   Esteban, Miguel ^a   Ahmed, Abubakari ^a   Olang, Tabitha A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^b UNITED NATIONS UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Ecosystem services; Green Economy; Mitigation strategies; Renewable energy

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE CHANGE; CONSERVATION; ECONOMICS; ECOSYSTEMS; ENERGY POLICY; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY;

BIODIVERSITY LOSS; ECOSYSTEM CHANGES; ECOSYSTEM SERVICES; ENERGY PATHWAY; GREEN ECONOMIES; IMPACT MECHANISM; LITERATURE REVIEWS; MILLENNIUM ECOSYSTEM ASSESSMENTS; MITIGATION STRATEGY; RENEWABLE ENERGIES;

BIODIVERSITY;

EID: 84997684020     PISSN: 13640321     EISSN: 18790690     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.rser.2016.08.030     Document Type: Review

References (504)

1. [1] Pearce, D., Markandya, A., Barbier, E.B., Blueprint for a Green Economy. 1989, Earthscan, London.
2. [2] UNEP, Towards a green economy: pathways to sustainable development and poverty eradication, 2011, United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), Nairobi.
3. [3] UNEP, A Guidance manual for Green Economy policy assessment. 2014, United Nations Environmental Programme (UNEP), Nairobi.
4. [4] CBD. Text of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal: Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD);1992.
5. [5] Mace, G.M., Norris, K., Fitter, A.H., Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol Evol 27 (2012), 19–25.
6. [6] MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), Current state and trends assessment, 2005, Island Press, Washington DC.
7. [7] MA (Millennium Ecosystem Assessment), Biodiversity synthesis, 2005, Island Press, Washington DC.
8. [8] Biodiversity, ecosystem functioning, and human wellbeing: an ecological and economic perspective. Naeem, S., Bunker, D.E., Hector, A., Loreau, M., Perrings, C., (eds.), 2009, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
9. [9] Cardinale, B.J., Duffy, J.E., Gonzalez, A., Hooper, D.U., Perrings, C., Venail, P., et al. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 486 (2012), 59–67, 10.1038/nature11148.
10. [10] Harrison, P.A., Berry, P.M., Simpson, G., Haslett, J.R., Blicharska, M., Bucur, M., Dunford, R., Egoh, B., Garcia-Llorente, M., Geamănă, N., Geertsema, W., Lommelen, E., Meiresonne, L., Turkelboom, F., Linkages between biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services: a systematic review. Ecosyst Serv 9 (2014), 191–203.
11. [11] Gasparatos, A., Willis, K.J., (eds.) Biodiversity in the green economy, 2015, Routledge, London.
12. [12] EC. Directive, 2009/28/EC on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources. Off J Eur Union L140 (2009), 16–62.
13. [13] REN21. Renewables 2015: Global Status Report. Paris: REN21 Secretariat; 2015.
14. [14] IPCC special report on renewable energy sources and climate change mitigation. Edenhofer, O., Pichs, R., Madruga Sokona, Y., Seyboth, K., Matschoss, P., Kadner, S., Zwickel, T., Eickemeier, P., Hansen, G., Schlömer, S., von Stechow, C., (eds.), 2011, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
15. [15] Katzner, T., Johnson, J.A., Evans, D.M., Garner, T.W.J., Gompper, M.E., Altwegg, R., Branch, T.A., Gordon, I.J., Pettorelli, N., Challenges and opportunities for animal conservation from renewable energy development. Anim Conserv 16 (2013), 367–369.
16. [16] Hastik, R., Basso, S., Geitner, C., Haida, C., Poljanec, A., Portaccio, A., et al. Renewable energies and ecosystem service impacts. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 48 (2015), 608–623, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.004.
17. [17] Tabassum, A., Premalatha, M., Abbasi, T., Abbasi, S.A., Wind energy: increasing deployment, rising environmental concerns. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 31 (2014), 270–288, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.11.019.
18. [18] Schuster, E., Bulling, L., Köppel, J., Consolidating the state of knowledge: a synoptical review of wind energy's wildlife effects. Environ Manag, 2015, 300–331, 10.1007/s00267-015-0501-5.
19. [19] Tsoutsos, T., Frantzeskaki, N., Gekas, V., Environmental impacts from the solar energy technologies. Energy Policy 33 (2005), 289–296, 10.1016/S0301-4215(03)00241-6.
20. [20] Turney, D., Fthenakis, V., Environmental impacts from the installation and operation of large-scale solar power plants. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15 (2011), 3261–3270, 10.1016/j.rser.2011.04.023.
21. [21] Hernandez, R.R., Easter, S.B., Murphy-Mariscal, M.L., Maestre, F.T., Tavassoli, M., Allen, E.B., et al. Environmental impacts of utility-scale solar energy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 29 (2014), 766–779, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.041.
22. [22] Carew-Reid, J., Kempinski, J., Clausen, A., Biodiversity and development of the hydropower sector: lessons from the vietnamese experience – volume I: review of the effects of hydropower development on biodiversity in Vietnam. Hanoi: International Centre for Environmental Management (ICEM), 2010.
23. [23] Dauber, J., Jones, M.B., Stout, J.C., The impact of biomass crop cultivation on temperate biodiversity. GCB Bioenergy 2 (2010), 289–309, 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01058.x.
24. [24] Verdade, L.M., Piña, C.I., Rosalino, L.M., Biofuels and biodiversity: challenges and opportunities. Environ Dev, 2015, 10.1016/j.envdev.2015.05.003.
25. [25] Frid, C., Andonegi, E., Depestele, J., Judd, A., Rihan, D., Rogers, S.I., et al. The environmental interactions of tidal and wave energy generation devices. Environ Impact Assess Rev 32 (2012), 133–139, 10.1016/j.eiar.2011.06.002.
26. [26] Bonar, P.A.J., Bryden, I.G., Borthwick, A.G.L., Social and ecological impacts of marine energy development. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 47 (2015), 486–495, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.068.
27. [27] Northrup, J.M., Wittemyer, G., Characterising the impacts of emerging energy development on wildlife, with an eye towards mitigation. Ecol Lett 16 (2012), 1–14, 10.1111/ele.12009.
28. [28] Brook, B.W., Bradshaw, C.J.A., Key role for nuclear energy in global biodiversity conservation. Conserv Biol 29 (2015), 702–712.
29. [29] TEEB, The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity: ecological and economic foundations. 2010, Earthscan, London.
30. [30] Díaz, S., Demissew, S., Carabias, J., Joly, C., Lonsdale, M., Ash, N., et al. The IPBES conceptual framework: connecting nature and people. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 14 (2015), 1–16, 10.1016/j.cosust.2014.11.002.
31. [31] SCBD. Global Biodiversity Outlook 3, Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity; 2010.
32. [32] SCBD. Global Biodiversity Outlook 4, Montreal: Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity; 2014.
33. [33] Lovich, J.E., Ennen, J.R., Wildlife conservation and solar energy development in the desert Southwest, United States. BioScience 61 (2011), 982–992.
34. [34] DeVault, T.L., Seamans, T.W., Schmidt, J. a, Belant, J.L., Blackwell, B.F., Mooers, N., et al. Bird use of solar photovoltaic installations at US airports: implications for aviation safety. Landsc Urban Plan, 122, 2014, 122, 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2013.11.017.
35. [35] McCrary, M.D., McKernan, R.L., Schreiber, R.L., Wagner, W.D., Sciarrotta, T.C., Avian mortality at a solar energy power plant. J Field Ornith 57 (1986), 135–141.
36. [36] Kagan, R., Viner, T.C., Trail, P.W., Espinoza, E.O., Avian mortality at solar energy facilities in southern California: a preliminary analysis. 2014, National Fish and Wildlife Forensics Laboratory, Ashland.
37. [37] Horváth, G., Kriska, G., Malik, P., Robertson, B., Polarized light pollution: a new kind of ecological photopollution. Front Ecol Environ 7 (2009), 317–325, 10.1890/080129.
38. [38] Horváth, G., Blahó, M., Egri, Á., Kriska, G., Seres, I., Robertson, B., Reducing the maladaptive attractiveness of solar panels to polarotactic insects. Conserv Biol 24 (2010), 1644–1653, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01518.x.
39. [39] Grippo, M., Hayse, J.W., O'Connor, B.L., Solar energy development and aquatic ecosystems in the southwestern United States: potential impacts, mitigation, and research needs. Environ Manag 55 (2015), 244–256, 10.1007/s00267-014-0384-x.
40. [40] Cameron, D.R., Cohen, B.S., Morrison, S.A., An approach to enhance the conservation-compatibility of solar energy development. PLoS One 7 (2012), 1–12, 10.1371/journal.pone.0038437.
41. [41] Wu, Z., Hou, A., Chang, C., Huang, X., Shi, D., Wang, Z., Environmental impacts of large-scale CSP plants in northwestern China. Environ Sci Process Impacts 16 (2014), 2432–2441, 10.1039/c4em00235k.
42. [42] Durant, S.M., Pettorelli, N., Bashir, S., Woodroffe, R., Wacher, T., De Ornellas, P., et al. Forgotten biodiversity in desert ecosystems. Science 336 (2012), 1379–1380, 10.1126/science.336.6087.1379.
43. [43] Brito, J.C., Godinho, R., Martínez-Freiría, F., Pleguezuelos, J.M., Rebelo, H., Santos, X., et al. Unravelling biodiversity, evolution and threats to conservation in the Sahara-Sahel. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc 89 (2014), 215–231, 10.1111/brv.12049.
44. [44] Villarreal, M.L., Norman, L.M., Boykin, K.G., Wallace, C.S.A., Biodiversity losses and conservation trade-offs: assessing future urban growth scenarios for a North American trade corridor. Int J Biodivers Sci Ecosyst Serv Manag 9 (2013), 90–103, 10.1080/21513732.2013.770800.
45. [45] Stoms, D.M., Dashiell, S.L., Davis, F.W., Siting solar energy development to minimize biological impacts. Renew Energy 57 (2013), 289–298, 10.1016/j.renene.2013.01.055.
46. [46] Hernandez, R.R., Hoffacker, M.K., Field, C.B., Efficient use of land to meet sustainable energy needs. Nat Clim Chang 5 (2015), 353–358, 10.1038/nclimate2556.
47. [47] Biodiversity, B.R.E., Guidance for solar developments. 2014, BRE National Solar Centre, St. Blazey.
48. [48] Planning, A., Loveday and Zoning for Solar in North Carolina. School of Government, 2014, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.
49. [49] Arizona Game and Fish Department. Guidelines for Solar Development in Arizona. Phoenix: Arizona Game and Fish Department;2009.
50. [50] Hamada, Y., Grippo, M.A., Remote-sensing application for facilitating land resource assessment and monitoring for utility-scale solar energy development. J Appl Remote Sens, 9, 2015, 097694, 10.1117/1.JRS.9.097694.
51. [51] Peste, F., Paula, A., da Silva, L.P., Bernardino, J., Pereira, P., Mascarenhas, M., et al. How to mitigate impacts of wind farms on bats? A review of potential conservation measures in the European context. Environ Impact Assess Rev 51 (2015), 10–22, 10.1016/j.eiar.2014.11.001.
52. [52] Devereux, C.L., Denny, M.J.H., Whittingham, M.J., Minimal effects of wind turbines on the distribution of wintering farmland birds. J Appl Ecol 45 (2008), 1689–1694.
53. [53] Villegas-Patraca, R., MacGregor-Fors, I., Ortiz-Martínez, T., Pérez-Sánchez, C.E., Herrera-Alsina, L., Muñoz-Robles, C., Bird-community shifts in relation to wind farms: a case study comparing a wind farm. Croplands, and Secondary Forests in Southern Mexico. Condor 114 (2012), 711–719, 10.1525/cond.2012.110130.
54. [54] Zwart, M.C., Robson, P., Rankin, S., Whittingham, M.J., McGowan, P.J.K., Using environmental impact assessment and post-construction monitoring data to inform wind energy developments. Ecosphere, 2015, 6, 10.1890/ES14-00331.1.
55. [55] Kikuchi, R., Adverse impacts of wind power generation on collision behaviour of birds and anti-predator behaviour of squirrels. J Nat Conserv 16 (2008), 44–55, 10.1016/j.jnc.2007.11.001.
56. [56] Carrete, M., Sánchez-Zapata, J.A., Benítez, J.R., Lobón, M., Donázar, J.A., Large scale risk-assessment of wind-farms on population viability of a globally endangered long-lived raptor. Biol Conserv 142 (2009), 2954–2961, 10.1016/j.biocon.2009.07.027.
57. [57] Schaub, M., Spatial distribution of wind turbines is crucial for the survival of red kite populations. Biol Conserv 155 (2012), 111–118, 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.06.021.
58. [58] Furness, R.W., Wade, H.M., Masden, E.A., Assessing vulnerability of marine bird populations to offshore wind farms. J Environ Manag 119 (2013), 56–66, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.01.025.
59. [59] Brown, M.J., Linton, E., Rees, E.C., Causes of mortality among wild swans in Britain. Wildfowl 43 (1992), 70–79.
60. [60] Drewitt, A.L., Langston, R.H.W., Assessing the impacts of wind farms on birds. Ibis 148 (2006), 29–42, 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2006.00516.x.
61. [61] Saidur, R., Rahim, N., Islam, M.R., Solangi, K.H., Environmental impact of wind energy. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15 (2011), 2423–2430, 10.1016/j.rser.2011.02.024.
62. [62] Voigt, C.C., Popa-Lisseanu, A.G., Niermann, I., Kramer-Schadt, S., The catchment area of wind farms for European bats: a plea for international regulations. Biol Conserv 153 (2012), 80–86, 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.04.027.
63. [63] Silva, J.P., Palmeirim, J.M., Alcazar, R., Correia, R., Delgado, A., Moreira, F., A spatially explicit approach to assess the collision risk between birds and overhead power lines: a case study with the little bustard. Biol Conserv 170 (2014), 256–263.
64. [64] Loss, S.R., Will, T., Marra, P.P., Estimates of bird collision mortality at wind facilities in the contiguous United States. Biol Conserv 168 (2013), 201–209, 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.10.007.
65. [65] Bastian, O., The role of biodiversity in supporting ecosystem services in Natura 2000 sites. Ecol Indic 24 (2013), 12–22.
66. [66] Pearce-Higgins, J.W., Stephen, L., Douse, A., Langston, R.H.W., Greater impacts of wind farms on bird populations during construction than subsequent operation: results of a multi-site and multi-species analysis. J Appl Ecol 49 (2012), 386–394.
67. [67] Agha, M., Lovich, J.E., Ennen, J.R., Augustine, B., Arundel, T.R., Murphy, M.O., et al. Turbines and terrestrial vertebrates: variation in tortoise survivorship between a wind energy facility and an adjacent undisturbed wildland area in the desert southwest (USA). Environ Manag 56 (2015), 332–341, 10.1007/s00267-015-0498-9.
68. [68] Bright, J., Langston, R., Bullman, R., Evans, R., Gardner, S., Pearce-Higgins, J., Map of bird sensitivities to wind farms in Scotland: a tool to aid planning and conservation. Biol Conserv 141 (2008), 2342–2356, 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.06.029.
69. [69] Liechti, F., Guélat, J., Komenda-Zehnder, S., Modelling the spatial concentrations of bird migration to assess conflicts with wind turbines. Biol Conserv 162 (2013), 24–32, 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.03.018.
70. [70] Rodrigues L, Bach L, Dubourg-Savage MJ, Karapandza B, Kovac D, Kervyn T, Dekker J, Kepel A, Bach P, Collins J, Harbusch C, Park K, Micevski D, Minderman J. Guidelines for Consideration of Bats in Wind Farm Projects: Revision 2014. Bonn:UNEP/EUROBATS Secretariat;2014.
71. [71] BBOP, Compensatory Conservation Case Studies. 2009, Business and Biodiversity Offsets Programme(BBOP), Washington, D.C.
72. [72] Pawliczek, J., Sullivan, S., Conservation and concealment in SpeciesBanking.com, USA: an analysis of neoliberal performance in the species offsetting industry. Environ Conserv, 38, 2011, 435–444, 10.1017/S0376892911000518.
73. [73] Bull, J.W., Suttle, K.B., Gordon, A., Singh, N.J., Milner-Gulland, E.J., Biodiversity offsets in theory and practice. Oryx 47 (2013), 369–380, 10.1017/S003060531200172X.
74. [74] Gardner, T.A., Von Hase, A., Brownlie, S., Ekstrom, J.M.M., Pilgrim, J.D., Savy, C.E., et al. Biodiversity offsets and the challenge of achieving no net Loss. Conserv Biol 27 (2013), 1254–1264, 10.1111/cobi.12118.
75. [75] Vaissière, A.-C., Levrel, H., Pioch, S., Carlier, A., Biodiversity offsets for offshore wind farm projects: the current situation in Europe. Mar Policy 48 (2014), 172–183, 10.1016/j.marpol.2014.03.023.
76. [76] Millon, L., Julien, J.-F., Julliard, R., Kerbiriou, C., Bat activity in intensively farmed landscapes with wind turbines and offset measures. Ecol Eng 75 (2015), 250–257, 10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.11.050.
77. [77] Vindigni, M.A., Morris, A.D., Miller, D.A., Kalcounis-Rueppell, M.C., Use of modified water sources by bats in a managed pine landscape. For Ecol Manag 258 (2009), 2056–2061.
78. [78] Kiesecker, J.M., Evans, J.S., Fargione, J., Doherty, K., Foresman, K.R., Kunz, T.H., et al. Win-win for wind and wildlife: a vision to facilitate sustainable development. PLoS One, 6, 2011, e17566, 10.1371/journal.pone.0017566.
79. [79] Technology Roadmap, I.E.A., Hydropower. 2012, International Energy Agency (IEA), Paris.
80. [80] King, C.W., Principles for protecting freshwater resources and biodiversity during a low-carbon energy transition. 2013, Energy Institute, Austin.
81. [81] Bunn, S.E., Arthington, A.H., Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environ Manag 30 (2002), 492–507.
82. [82] Poff, N.L., Allan, J.D., Bain, M.B., Karr, J.R., Prestegaard, K.L., Richter, B.D., et al. The natural flow regime a paradigm for river conservation and restoration. Bioscience 47 (1997), 769–784.
83. [83] Poff, N.L., Olden, J.D., Merritt, D.M., Pepin, D.M., Homogenization of regional river dynamics by dams and global biodiversity implications. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104 (2007), 5732–5737, 10.1073/pnas.0609812104.
84. [84] Poff, N.L., Zimmerman, J.K.H., Ecological responses to altered flow regimes: a literature review to inform the science and management of environmental flows. Freshw Biol 55 (2010), 194–205, 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02272.x.
85. [85] Renöfält, B.M., Jansson, R., Nilsson, C., Effects of hydropower generation and opportunities for environmental flow management in Swedish riverine ecosystems. Freshw Biol 55 (2010), 49–67, 10.1111/j.1365-2427.2009.02241.x.
86. [86] Anderson, E.P., Pringle, C.M., Freeman, M.C., Quantifying the extent of river fragmentation by hydropower dams in the Sarapiquí River Basin, Costa Rica. Aquat Conserv Mar Freshw Ecosyst 18 (2008), 408–417, 10.1002/aqc.882.
87. [87] Benchimol, M., Peres, C.A., Predicting local extinctions of Amazonian vertebrates in forest islands created by a mega dam. Biol Conserv 187 (2015), 61–72, 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.04.005.
88. [88] Finer, M., Jenkins, C.N., Proliferation of hydroelectric dams in the Andean Amazon and implications for Andes-Amazon connectivity. PLoS One, 7, 2012, e35126, 10.1371/journal.pone.0035126.
89. [89] Zhang, W., Hu, Y., Chen, B., Tang, Z., Xu, C., Qi, D., Hu, J., Evaluation of habitat fragmentation of giant panda (Ailuropoda melanoleuca) on the north slopes of Daxiangling Mountains, Sichuan province, China. Anim Biol 57 (2007), 485–500.
90. [90] Nautiyal, P., Nautiyal, R., Semwal, V.P., Mishra, A.S., Verma, J., Uniyal, D.P., et al. Ecosystem health indicators in the Ganga Basin (Uttarakhand, India): Biodiversity, spatial patterns in structure and distribution of benthic diatoms, macro-invertebrates and ichthyofauna. Aquat Ecosyst Health Manag 16 (2013), 362–373.
91. [91] Li, C., Zhao, C., Fan, P.-F., White-cheeked macaque (Macaca leucogenys ): A new macaque species from Medog, southeastern Tibet. Am J Primatol 77 (2015), 753–766, 10.1002/ajp.22394.
92. [92] Kormos, R., Kormos, C.F., Humle, T., Lanjouw, A., Rainer, H., Victurine, R., et al. Great apes and biodiversity offset projects in Africa: the case for national offset strategies. PLoS One, 9, 2014, e111671, 10.1371/journal.pone.0111671.
93. [93] Fearnside, P.M., Impacts of Brazil's Madeira River Dams: Unlearned lessons for hydroelectric development in Amazonia. Environ Sci Policy 38 (2014), 164–172, 10.1016/j.envsci.2013.11.004.
94. [94] Panwar, S., Agrawal, D.K., Negi, G.C.S., Kanwal, K.S., Sharma, V., Lodhi, M.S., et al. Impact assessment of a hydroelectric project on the flora in the Western Himalayan region based on vegetation analysis and socio-economic studies. J Environ Plan Manag 53 (2010), 907–923.
95. [95] Ferreira J., Aragão LEOC, Barlow J., Gardner TA. Brazil's environmental leadership at risk Mining and dams threaten protected areas. Science 2014;346:706–707.
96. [96] Palmeirim, A.F., Peres, C.A., Rosas, F.C.W., Giant otter population responses to habitat expansion and degradation induced by a mega hydroelectric dam. Biol Conserv 174 (2014), 30–38, 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.03.015.
97. [97] Almodóvar, A., Nicola, G.G., Effects of a small hydropower station upon brown troutSalmo trutta L. in the River Hoz Seca (Tagus basin, Spain) one year after regulation. Regul Rivers Res Manag 15 (1999), 477–484, 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1646(199909/10)15:5<477::AID-RRR560>3.0.CO;2-B.
98. [98] Anderson, E.P., Freeman, M.C., Pringle, C.M., Ecological consequences of hydropower development in Central America: impacts of small dams and water diversion on neotropical stream fish assemblages. River Res Appl 22 (2006), 397–411, 10.1002/rra.899.
99. [99] Vaikasas, S., Palaima, K., Pliūraitė, V., Influence of hydropower dams on the state of macroinvertebrates assemblages in the Virvyte river, Lithuania. J Environ Eng Landsc Manag 21 (2013), 305–315.
100. [100] Zilihona, I.J.E., Niemelä, J., Nummelin, M., Effects of a hydropower plant on Coleopteran diversity and abundance in the Udzungwa Mountains, Tanzania. Biodivers Conserv 13 (2004), 1453–1464, 10.1023/B:BIOC.0000021325.90554.0b.
101. [101] Ambelu, A., Lock, K., Goethals, P.L.M., Hydrological and anthropogenic influence in the gilgel gibe i reservoir (Ethiopia) on macroinvertebrate assemblages. Lake Reserv Manage 29 (2013), 143–150.
102. [102] Lessard, J., Hicks, D.M., Snelder, T.H., Arscott, D.B., Larned, S.T., Booker, D., et al. Dam design can impede adaptive management of environmental flows: a case study from the Opuha Dam, New Zealand. Environ Manag 51 (2013), 459–473, 10.1007/s00267-012-9971-x.
103. [103] Sun, R., Deng, W., Yuan, J., Li, X., Influence of hydropower exploitation on characteristics of Riparian Plant communities in mountain rivers. Res Environ Sci 28 (2015), 915–922.
104. [104] Jesus, T., Formigo, N., Santos, P., Tavares, G.R., Impact evaluation of the Vila Viçosa small hydroelectric power plant (Portugal) on the water quality and on the dynamics of the benthic macroinvertebrate communities of the Ardena river. Limnetica 23 (2004), 241–256.
105. [105] Sá-Oliveira, J.C., Hawes, J.E., Isaac-Nahum, V.J., Peres, C., Upstream and downstream responses of fish assemblages to an Eastern Amazonian hydroelectric dam. Freshw Biol 60 (2015), 2037–2050, 10.1111/fwb.12628.
106. [106] Simões, P.I., Stow, A., Hödl, W., Amézquita, A., Farias, I.P., Lima, A.P., The value of including intraspecific measures of biodiversity in environmental impact surveys is highlighted by the Amazonian brilliant-thighed frog (Allobates femoralis). Trop Conserv Sci 7 (2014), 811–828.
107. [107] Marmulla, G., Dams, fish and fisheries: Opportunities, challenges and conflict resolution, 2001, Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO), Rome.
108. [108] Brown, J.J., Limburg, K.E., Waldman, J.R., Stephenson, K., Glenn, E.P., Juanes, F., et al. Fish and hydropower on the U.S. Atlantic coast: failed fisheries policies from half-way technologies. Conserv Lett 6 (2013), 280–286, 10.1111/conl.12000.
109. [109] Gunkel, G., Lange, U., Walde, D., Rosa, J.W.C., The environmental and operational impacts of Curuá-Una, a reservoir in the Amazon region of Pará, Brazil. Lakes Reserv Res Manag 8 (2003), 201–216.
110. [110] Siergieiev, D., Widerlund, A., Lundberg, A., Almqvist, L., Collomp, M., Ingri, J., et al. Impact of hydropower regulation on river water composition in Northern Sweden. Aquat Geochem 20 (2013), 59–80, 10.1007/s10498-013-9215-6.
111. [111] Fanny, C., Virginie, A., Jean-François, F., Jonathan, B., Marie-Claude, R., Simon, D., Benthic indicators of sediment quality associated with run-of-river reservoirs. Hydrobiologia 703 (2012), 149–164, 10.1007/s10750-012-1355-y.
112. [112] Pimenta, A.M., Albertoni, E.F., Palma-Silva, C., Characterization of water quality in a small hydropower plant reservoir in southern Brazil. Lakes Reserv Res Manag 17 (2012), 243–251, 10.1111/lre.12007.
113. [113] Valero, E., Characterization of the water quality status on a stretch of river lerez around a small hydroelectric power station. Water 4 (2012), 815–834, 10.3390/w4040815.
114. 2 fluxes in a tropical hydropower reservoir. Biogeosciences 12 (2015), 147–162.
115. [115] St. Louis, V.L., Kelly, C.A., Duchemin, É., Rudd, J.W.M., Rosenberg, D.M., Reservoir surfaces as sources of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere: a global estimate. Bioscience, 50, 2000, 766, 10.1641/0006-3568(2000)050[0766:RSASOG]2.0.CO;2.
116. [116] Giles, J., Methane quashes green credentials of hydropower. Nature 444 (2006), 524–525.
117. [117] Delsontro, T., McGinnis, D.F., Sobek, S., Ostrovsky, I., Wehrli, B., Extreme methane emissions from a Swiss hydropower reservoir: contribution from bubbling sediments. Environ Sci Technol 44 (2010), 2419–2425, 10.1021/es9031369.
118. [118] Tremblay, A., Lambert, M., Gagnon, L., Do hydroelectric reservoirs emit greenhouse gases?. Environ Manag, 2004, 33, 10.1007/s00267-003-9158-6.
119. [119] dos Santos, M.A., Rosa, L.P., Greenhouse gas emissions from hydropower reservoirs: a synthesis of knowledge. Int J Hydropower Dams 18 (2011), 71–74.
120. [120] dos Santos, M.A., Rosa, L.P., Sikar, B., Sikar, E., dos Santos, E.O., Gross greenhouse gas fluxes from hydro-power reservoir compared to thermo-power plants. Energy Policy 34 (2006), 481–488.
121. [121] Barros, N., Cole, J.J., Tranvik, L.J., Prairie, Y.T., Bastviken, D., Huszar, V.L.M., et al. Carbon emission from hydroelectric reservoirs linked to reservoir age and latitude. Nat Geosci 4 (2011), 593–596, 10.1038/ngeo1211.
122. [122] Almeida, R.M., Barros, N., Cole, J.J., Tranvik, L., Roland, F., Emissions from Amazonian dams. Nat Clim Change, 3, 2013, 1005.
123. [123] Benchimol, M., Peres, C.A., Widespread forest vertebrate extinctions induced by a mega hydroelectric dam in Lowland Amazonia. PLoS One, 10, 2015, e0129818, 10.1371/journal.pone.0129818.
124. [124] Pandit, M.K., Grumbine, R.E., Potential effects of ongoing and proposed hydropower development on terrestrial biological diversity in the Indian Himalaya. Conserv Biol 26 (2012), 1061–1071, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01918.x.
125. [125] Grumbine, R.E., Pandit, M.K., Threats from India's Himalaya dams. Science 339 (2013), 36–37.
126. [126] Dudgeon, D., River rehabilitation for conservation of fish biodiversity in monsoonal Asia. Ecol Soc, 10, 2005, 15.
127. [127] Tullos, D.D., Foster-Moore, E., Magee, D., Tilt, B., Wolf, A.T., Schmitt, E., et al. Biophysical, Socioeconomic, and geopolitical vulnerabilities to hydropower development on the Nu River, China. Ecol Soc, 18, 2013, 16, 10.5751/ES-05465-180316.
128. [128] Ziv, G., Baran, E., Nam, S., Rodríguez-Iturbe, I., Levin, S.A., Trading-off fish biodiversity, food security, and hydropower in the Mekong River Basin. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109 (2012), 5609–5614.
129. [129] Guo, Z., Zhang, L., Li, Y., Increased dependence of humans on ecosystem services and biodiversity. PLoS One, 5, 2010, e13113, 10.1371/journal.pone.0013113.
130. [130] McDonald, R.I., Olden, J.D., Opperman, J.J., Miller, W.M., Fargione, J., Revenga, C., Higgins, J.V., Powell, J., Energy, water and fish: biodiversity impacts of energy-sector water demand in the United States depend on efficiency and policy measures. PLoS One, 7, 2012, e50219.
131. [131] Koutsoyiannis, D., Scale of water resources development and sustainability: small is beautiful, large is great. Hydrol Sci J 56 (2011), 553–575, 10.1080/02626667.2011.579076.
132. [132] Bakken, T.H., Aase, A.G., Hagen, D., Sundt, H., Barton, D.N., Lujala, P., Demonstrating a new framework for the comparison of environmental impacts from small- and large-scale hydropower and wind power projects. J Environ Manag 140 (2014), 93–101, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.01.050.
133. [133] Kibler KM, Tullos DD. Cumulative biophysical impact of small and large hydropower development in Nu River, China. Water Resour Res:49;3104–18.
134. [134] SNIFFER, Impact of run of river hydro schemes up on fish populations. 2011, Scotland & Northern Ireland Forum for Environmental Research (SNIFFER), Edinburg.
135. [135] Jager, H.I., Bevelhimer, M.S., How run-of-river operation affects hydropower generation and value. Environ Manag 40 (2007), 1004–1015, 10.1007/s00267-007-9008-z.
136. [136] Lazzaro, G., Botter, G., Run-of-river power plants in Alpine regions: Whither optimal capacity?. Water Resour Res 51 (2015), 5658–5676, 10.1002/2014WR016642.
137. [137] Person, E., Bieri, M., Peter, A., Schleiss, A.J., Mitigation measures for fish habitat improvement in Alpine rivers affected by hydropower operations. Ecohydrology 7 (2014), 580–599, 10.1002/eco.1380.
138. [138] Pander, J., Mueller, M., Geist, J., Ecological functions of fish bypass channels in streams: migration corridor and habitat for rheophilic species. River Res Appl 29 (2013), 441–450, 10.1002/rra.1612.
139. [139] Mallen-Cooper, M., Brand, D.A., Non-salmonids in a salmonid fishway: what do 50 years of data tell us about past and future fish passage?. Fish Manag Ecol 14 (2007), 319–332, 10.1111/j.1365-2400.2007.00557.x.
140. [140] Oldani, N.O., Baigún, C.R.M., Nestler, J.M., Goodwin, R.A., Is fish passage technology saving fish resources in the lower La Plata River basin?. Neotrop Ichthyol 5 (2007), 89–102, 10.1590/S1679-62252007000200002.
141. [141] Rudberg, P., Mitigating the adverse effects of hydropower projects: A comparative review of river restoration and hydropower regulation in Sweden and the United States. Georgetown Int Environ Law Rev 27 (2015), 251–274.
142. [142] Roberts, J.J., Cassula, A.M., Osvaldo Prado, P., Dias, R.A., Balestieri, J.A.P., Assessment of dry residual biomass potential for use as alternative energy source in the party of General Pueyrredón, Argentina. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 41 (2015), 568–583, 10.1016/j.rser.2014.08.066.
143. [143] Gasparatos, A., Lee, L., Maltitz, G.P., von, Mathai, M.V., Oliveira, J.A.P., de, Johnson, F.X., et al. Catalysing biofuel sustainability – international and national policy interventions. Environ Policy Law 43 (2013), 216–221.
144. [144] Pedroli, B., Elbersen, B., Frederiksen, P., Grandin, U., Heikkilä, R., Krogh, P.H., et al. Is energy cropping in Europe compatible with biodiversity? - Opportunities and threats to biodiversity from land-based production of biomass for bioenergy purposes. Biomass Bioenergy 55 (2013), 73–86, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.09.054.
145. [145] Gasparatos, A., Stromberg, P., Takeuchi, K., Biofuels, ecosystem services and human wellbeing: Putting biofuels in the ecosystem services narrative. Agric Ecosyst Environ 142 (2011), 111–128, 10.1016/j.agee.2011.04.020.
146. [146] Kline, K.L., Martinelli, F.S., Mayer, A.L., Medeiros, R., Oliveira, C.O.F., Sparovek, G., et al. Bioenergy and biodiversity: key lessons from the Pan American Region. Environ Manag 56 (2015), 1377–1396, 10.1007/s00267-015-0559-0.
147. [147] Sweaney, N., Driscoll, D.A., Lindenmayer, D.B., Porch, N., Plantations, not farmlands, cause biotic homogenisation of ground-active beetles in South-Eastern Australia. Biol Conserv 186 (2015), 1–11.
148. [148] Christensen, M., Rayamajhi, S., Meilby, H., Balancing fuelwood and biodiversity concerns in rural Nepal. Ecol Modell 220 (2009), 522–532, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2008.10.014.
149. [149] Eggers, J., Troeltzsch, K., Falcucci, A., Maiorano, L., Verburg, P.H., Framstad, E., et al. Is biofuel policy harming biodiversity in Europe?. GCB Bioenergy 1 (2009), 18–34, 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2009.01002.x.
150. [150] Lassauce, A., Lieutier, F., Bouget, C., Woodfuel harvesting and biodiversity conservation in temperate forests: effects of logging residue characteristics on saproxylic beetle assemblages. Biol Conserv 147 (2012), 204–212, 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.01.001.
151. [151] Specht, M.J., Pinto, S.R.R., Albuqueque, U.P., Tabarelli, M., Melo, F.P.L., Burning biodiversity: fuelwood harvesting causes forest degradation in human-dominated tropical landscapes. Glob Ecol Conserv 3 (2015), 200–209, 10.1016/j.gecco.2014.12.002.
152. [152] Millan, C.H., Develey, P.F., Verdade, L.M., Stand-level management practices increase occupancy by birds in exotic Eucalyptus plantations. For Ecol Manag 336 (2015), 174–182, 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.10.005.
153. [153] Calviño-Cancela, M., Effectiveness of eucalypt plantations as a surrogate habitat for birds. For Ecol Manag 310 (2013), 692–699, 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.09.014.
154. [154] Ulrich, W., Buszko, J., Czarnecki, A., The contribution of poplar plantations to regional diversity of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) in agricultural landscapes. Ann Zool Fenn 41 (2004), 501–512.
155. [155] Dotta, G., Verdade, L.M., Medium to large-sized mammals in agricultural landscapes of south-eastern Brazil. Mammalia 75 (2011), 345–352, 10.1515/MAMM.2011.049.
156. [156] Timo, T., Lyra-Jorge, M., Gheler-Costa, C., Verdade, L., Effect of the plantation age on the use of Eucalyptus stands by medium to large-sized wild mammals in south-eastern Brazil. iForest – Biogeosciences For 8 (2015), 108–113, 10.3832/ifor1237-008.
157. [157] Kumar, M.A., Mudappa, D., TRS, Raman, Asian Elephant Elephas maximus habitat use and ranging in fragmented rainforest and plantations in the Anamalai Hills, India. Trop Conserv Sci 3 (2010), 143–158.
158. [158] Fry, D.A., Slater, F., The effect on plant communities and associated taxa of planting short rotation willow coppice in Wales. Asp Appl Biol 90 (2008), 287–293.
159. [159] Dias, A.C., Life cycle assessment of fuel chip production from eucalypt forest residues. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19 (2014), 705–717, 10.1007/s11367-013-0671-4.
160. [160] González-García, S., Berg, S., Moreira, M.T., Feijoo, G., Evaluation of forest operations in Spanish eucalypt plantations under a life cycle assessment perspective. Scand J For Res 24 (2009), 160–172, 10.1080/02827580902773462.
161. [161] Morales, M., Aroca, G., Rubilar, R., Acuña, E., Mola-Yudego, B., González-García, S., Cradle-to-gate life cycle assessment of Eucalyptus globulus short rotation plantations in Chile. J Clean Prod 99 (2015), 239–249, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.085.
162. [162] Gabrielle, B., Nguyen The, N., Maupu, P., Vial, E., Life cycle assessment of eucalyptus short rotation coppices for bioenergy production in southern France. GCB Bioenergy 5 (2013), 30–42, 10.1111/gcbb.12008.
163. [163] Dias, A.C., Arroja, L., Environmental impacts of eucalypt and maritime pine wood production in Portugal. J Clean Prod 37 (2012), 368–376, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.07.056.
164. [164] San Miguel, G., Corona, B., Ruiz, D., Landholm, D., Laina, R., Tolosana, E., et al. Environmental, energy and economic analysis of a biomass supply chain based on a poplar short rotation coppice in Spain. J Clean Prod 94 (2015), 93–101, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.070.
165. [165] González-García, S., Bacenetti, J., Murphy, R.J., Fiala, M., Present and future environmental impact of poplar cultivation in the Po Valley (Italy) under different crop management systems. J Clean Prod 26 (2012), 56–66, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2011.12.020.
166. [166] Roedl, A., Production and energetic utilization of wood from short rotation coppice-a life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 15 (2010), 567–578, 10.1007/s11367-010-0195-0.
167. [167] Gasol, C.M., Gabarrell, X., Anton, A., Rigola, M., Carrasco, J., Ciria, P., et al. LCA of poplar bioenergy system compared with Brassica carinata energy crop and natural gas in regional scenario. Biomass Bioenergy 33 (2009), 119–129, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.04.020.
168. [168] Heller, M.C., Keoleian, G.A., Volk, T.A., Life cycle assessment of a willow bioenergy cropping system. Biomass Bioenergy 25 (2003), 147–165, 10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00190-3.
169. [169] Volk, T., Verwijst, T., Tharakan, P.J., Abrahamson, L.P., White, E.H., Growing fuel: a sustainability assessment of willow biomass crops. Front Ecol Environ 2 (2004), 411–418.
170. [170] González-García, S., Mola-Yudego, B., Murphy, R.J., Life cycle assessment of potential energy uses for short rotation willow biomass in Sweden. Int J Life Cycle Assess 18 (2013), 783–795, 10.1007/s11367-012-0536-2.
171. [171] Buonocore, E., Franzese, P.P., Ulgiati, S., Assessing the environmental performance and sustainability of bioenergy production in Sweden: A life cycle assessment perspective. Energy 37 (2012), 69–78, 10.1016/j.energy.2011.07.032.
172. [172] Kimming, M., Sundberg, C., Nordberg, Å., Baky, A., Bernesson, S., Norén, O., et al. Biomass from agriculture in small-scale combined heat and power plants: A comparative life cycle assessment. Biomass Bioenergy 35 (2011), 1572–1581, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.12.027.
173. [173] Rugani, B., Golkowska, K., Vázquez-Rowe, I., Koster, D., Benetto, E., Verdonckt, P., Simulation of environmental impact scores within the life cycle of mixed wood chips from alternative short rotation coppice systems in Flanders (Belgium). Appl Energy 156 (2015), 449–464, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.07.032.
174. [174] Ashworth, K., Folberth, G., Hewitt, C.N., Wild, O., Impacts of near-future cultivation of biofuel feedstocks on atmospheric composition and local air quality. Atmos Chem Phys 12 (2012), 919–939.
175. [175] Hansson, J., Martinsson, F., Gustavsson, M., Greenhouse gas performance of heat and electricity from wood pellet value chains - based on pellets for the Swedish market. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefining 9 (2015), 378–396, 10.1002/bbb.1538.
176. [176] Röder, M., Whittaker, C., Thornley, P., How certain are greenhouse gas reductions from bioenergy? Life cycle assessment and uncertainty analysis of wood pellet-to-electricity supply chains from forest residues. Biomass Bioenergy 79 (2015), 50–63, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.03.030.
177. [177] Ashworth, K., Wild, O., Eller, A.S.D., Hewitt, C.N., Impact of biofuel poplar cultivation on ground-level ozone and premature human mortality depends on cultivar selection and planting location. Environ Sci Technol 49 (2015), 8566–8575, 10.1021/acs.est.5b00266.
178. [178] González-García, S., Moreira, M.T., Dias, A.C., Mola-Yudego, B., Cradle-to-gate Life Cycle Assessment of forest operations in Europe: environmental and energy profiles. J Clean Prod 66 (2014), 188–198, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.067.
179. [179] Muench, S., Guenther, E., A systematic review of bioenergy life cycle assessments. Appl Energy 112 (2013), 257–273, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.06.001.
180. 2O) above a short-rotation poplar plantation after conversion from agricultural land. Agric For Meteorol 169 (2013), 100–110, 10.1016/j.agrformet.2012.10.008.
181. [181] Don, A., Osborne, B., Hastings, A., Skiba, U., Carter, M.S., Drewer, J., et al. Land-use change to bioenergy production in Europe: implications for the greenhouse gas balance and soil carbon. GCB Bioenergy 4 (2012), 372–391, 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01116.x.
182. [182] Nikièma, P., Rothstein, D.E., Miller, R.O., Initial greenhouse gas emissions and nitrogen leaching losses associated with converting pastureland to short-rotation woody bioenergy crops in northern Michigan, USA. Biomass Bioenergy 39 (2012), 413–426, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.01.037.
183. [183] Tölle, M.H., Gutjahr, O., Busch, G., Thiele, J.C., Increasing bioenergy production on arable land: does the regional and local climate respond? Germany as a case study. J Geophys Res Atmos 119 (2014), 2711–2724, 10.1002/2013JD020877.
184. [184] Murphy, L.N., Riley, W.J., Collins, W.D., Local and remote climate impacts from expansion of woody biomass for bioenergy feedstock in the Southeastern United States. J Clim, 25, 2012, 7643, 10.1175/JCLI-D-11-00535.1.
185. [185] Bright, R.M., Strømman, A.H., Peters, G.P., Radiative forcing impacts of boreal forest biofuels: a scenario study for Norway in light of albedo. Environ Sci Technol 45 (2011), 7570–7580, 10.1021/es201746b.
186. [186] Bright, R.M., Cherubini, F., Strømman, A.H., Climate impacts of bioenergy: inclusion of carbon cycle and albedo dynamics in life cycle impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 37 (2012), 2–11, 10.1016/j.eiar.2012.01.002.
187. [187] Gordon, D.R., Tancig, K.J., Onderdonk, D.A., Gantz, C.A., Assessing the invasive potential of biofuel species proposed for Florida and the United States using the Australian Weed Risk Assessment. Biomass Bioenergy 35 (2011), 74–79, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2010.08.029.
188. [188] Barney, J.N., DiTomaso, J.M., Global climate niche estimates for bioenergy crops and invasive species of agronomic origin: potential problems and opportunities. PLoS One, 6, 2011, e17222, 10.1371/journal.pone.0017222.
189. [189] Vance, E.D., Loehle, C., Wigley, T.B., Weatherford, P., Scientific basis for sustainable management of Eucalyptus and populus as short-rotation woody crops in the U.S. Forests 5 (2014), 901–918.
190. [190] Sax, D.F., Equal diversity in disparate species assemblages: A comparison of native and exotic woodlands in California. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 11 (2002), 49–57, 10.1046/j.1466-822X.2001.00262.x.
191. [191] Dukes, J.S., Mooney, H.A., Disruption of ecosystem processes in western North America by invasive species. Rev Chil Hist Nat 77 (2004), 411–437, 10.4067/S0716-078X2004000300003.
192. [192] Barbour, R.C., Potts, B.M., Vaillancourt, R.E., Gene flow between introduced and native Eucalyptus species: Early-age selection limits invasive capacity of exotic E. ovata × nitens F1 hybrids. For Ecol Manag 228 (2006), 206–214, 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.03.004.
193. [193] Branco, S., Videira, N., Branco, M., Paiva, M.R., A review of invasive alien species impacts on eucalypt stands and citrus orchards ecosystem services: towards an integrated management approach. J Environ Manag 149 (2015), 17–26, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.09.026.
194. [194] Calviño-Cancela, M., Rubido-Bará, M., Invasive potential of Eucalyptus globulus: Seed dispersal, seedling recruitment and survival in habitats surrounding plantations. For Ecol Manag 305 (2013), 129–137, 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.05.037.
195. [195] Fargione, J.E., Plevin, R.J., Hill, J.D., The Ecological Impact of Biofuels. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst 41 (2010), 351–377, 10.1146/annurev-ecolsys-102209-144720.
196. [196] Immerzeel, D.J., Verweij, P.A., van der Hilst, F., Faaij, A.P.C., Biodiversity impacts of bioenergy crop production: a state-of-the-art review. GCB Bioenergy 6 (2014), 183–209, 10.1111/gcbb.12067.
197. [197] Chaudhary, A., Verones, F., de Baan, L., Hellweg, S., Quantifying land use impacts on biodiversity: combining species-area models and vulnerability indicators. Environ Sci Technol 49 (2015), 9987–9995, 10.1021/acs.est.5b02507.
198. [198] Fitzherbert, E.B., Struebig, M.J., Morel, A., Danielsen, F., Brühl, C.A., Donald, P.F., et al. How will oil palm expansion affect biodiversity?. Trends Ecol Evol 23 (2008), 538–545, 10.1016/j.tree.2008.06.012.
199. [199] Searchinger, T., Heimlich, R., Houghton, R.A., Dong, F., Elobeid, A., Fabiosa, J., et al. Use of U.S. croplands for biofuels increases greenhouse gases through emissions from land-use change. Science 319 (2008), 1238–1240, 10.1126/science.1151861.
200. [200] Khanna, M., Crago, C.L., Black, M., Can biofuels be a solution to climate change? The implications of land use change-related emissions for policy. Interface Focus 1 (2011), 233–247, 10.1098/rsfs.2010.0016.
201. [201] Sanchez, S.T., Woods, J., Akhurst, M., Brander, M., O'Hare, M., Dawson, T.P., et al. Accounting for indirect land-use change in the life cycle assessment of biofuel supply chains. J R Soc Interface 9 (2012), 1105–1119, 10.1098/rsif.2011.0769.
202. [202] Finkbeiner, M., Indirect land use change – Help beyond the hype?. Biomass Bioenergy 62 (2014), 218–221, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.01.024.
203. [203] Martinelli, L.A., Filoso, S., Expansion of sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil: environmental and social challenges. Ecol Appl 18 (2008), 885–898.
204. [204] Filoso, S., Do Carmo, J.B., Mardegan, S.F., Lins, S.R.M., Gomes, T.F., Martinelli, L.A., Reassessing the environmental impacts of sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil to help meet sustainability goals. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 52 (2015), 1847–1856.
205. [205] Smeets, E., Junginger, M., Faaij, A., Walter, A., Dolzan, P., Turkenburg, W., The sustainability of Brazilian ethanol: an assessment of the possibilities of certified production. Biomass Bioenergy 32 (2008), 781–813, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.01.005.
206. [206] Sparovek, G., Berndes, G., Egeskog, A., de Freitas, F.L.M., Gustafsson, S., Hansson, J., Sugarcane ethanol production in Brazil: an expansion model sensitive to socioeconomic and environmental concerns. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefining 1 (2007), 270–282.
207. [207] Lapola, D.M., Schaldach, R., Alcamo, J., Bondeau, A., Koch, J., Koelking, C., et al. Indirect land-use changes can overcome carbon savings from biofuels in Brazil. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107 (2010), 3388–3393, 10.1073/pnas.0907318107.
208. [208] Koh, L.P., Wilcove, D.S., Is oil palm agriculture really destroying tropical biodiversity?. Conserv Lett 1 (2008), 60–64, 10.1111/j.1755-263X.2008.00011.x.
209. [209] Koh, L.P., Miettinen, J., Liew, S.C., Ghazoul, J., Remotely sensed evidence of tropical peatland conversion to oil palm. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 108 (2011), 5127–5132, 10.1073/pnas.1018776108.
210. [210] Lee, J.S.H., Abood, S., Ghazoul, J., Barus, B., Obidzinski, K., Koh, L.P., Environmental impacts of large-scale oil palm enterprises exceed that of smallholdings in Indonesia. Conserv Lett 7 (2014), 25–33, 10.1111/conl.12039.
211. [211] Teuscher, M., Vorlaufer, M., Wollni, M., Brose, U., Mulyani, Y., Clough, Y., Trade-offs between bird diversity and abundance, yields and revenue in smallholder oil palm plantations in Sumatra, Indonesia. Biol Conserv 186 (2015), 306–318, 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.022.
212. [212] Danielsen, F., Beukema, H., Burgess, N.D., Parish, F., Brühl, C.A., Donald, P.F., et al. Biofuel plantations on forested lands: double jeopardy for biodiversity and climate. Conserv Biol 23 (2009), 348–358, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.01096.x.
213. [213] Peh, K.S.-H., Jong, J. de, Sodhi, N.S., Lim, S.L.-H., Yap, C.A.-M., Lowland rainforest avifauna and human disturbance: persistence of primary forest birds in selectively logged forests and mixed-rural habitats of southern Peninsular Malaysia. Biol Conserv 123 (2005), 489–505, 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.01.010.
214. [214] Hamer, K.C., Hill, J.K., Benedick, S., Mustaffa, N., Sherratt, T.N., Maryati, M., et al. Ecology of butterflies in natural and selectively logged forests of northern Borneo: the importance of habitat heterogeneity. J Appl Ecol 40 (2003), 150–162, 10.1046/j.1365-2664.2003.00783.x.
215. [215] Dumbrell, A.J., Hill, J.K., Impacts of selective logging on canopy and ground assemblages of tropical forest butterflies: Implications for sampling. Biol Conserv 125 (2005), 123–131, 10.1016/j.biocon.2005.02.016.
216. [216] Blanchard, R., O'Farrell, P.J., Richardson, D.M., Anticipating potential biodiversity conflicts for future biofuel crops in South Africa: incorporating spatial filters with species distribution models. GCB Bioenergy 7 (2015), 273–287, 10.1111/gcbb.12129.
217. [217] van Eijck, J., Romijn, H., Smeets, E., Bailis, R., Rooijakkers, M., Hooijkaas, N., et al. Comparative analysis of key socio-economic and environmental impacts of smallholder and plantation based jatropha biofuel production systems in Tanzania. Biomass Bioenergy 61 (2014), 25–45, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.10.005.
218. [218] Britz, W., Hertel, T.W., Impacts of EU biofuels directives on global markets and EU environmental quality: an integrated PE, global CGE analysis. Agric Ecosyst Environ 142 (2011), 102–109, 10.1016/j.agee.2009.11.003.
219. [219] Hellmann, F., Verburg, P.H., Impact assessment of the European biofuel directive on land use and biodiversity. J Environ Manag 91 (2010), 1389–1396, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.022.
220. [220] McDonald, R.I., Fargione, J., Kiesecker, J., Miller, W.M., Powell, J., Energy sprawl or energy efficiency: Climate policy impacts on natural habitat for the United States of America. PLoS One, 4, 2009, e6802.
221. [221] Semere, T., Slater, F., Ground flora, small mammal and bird species diversity in miscanthus (Miscanthus×giganteus) and reed canary-grass (Phalaris arundinacea) fields. Biomass Bioenergy 31 (2007), 20–29, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2006.07.001.
222. [222] Semere, T., Slater, F.M., Invertebrate populations in miscanthus (Miscanthus×giganteus) and reed canary-grass (Phalaris arundinacea) fields. Biomass Bioenergy 31 (2007), 30–39, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2006.07.002.
223. [223] Werling, B.P., Dickson, T.L., Isaacs, R., Gaines, H., Gratton, C., Gross, K.L., et al. Perennial grasslands enhance biodiversity and multiple ecosystem services in bioenergy landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 111 (2014), 1652–1657, 10.1073/pnas.1309492111.
224. [224] Robertson, B.A., Doran, P.J., Loomis, E.R., Robertson, J.R., Schemske, D.W., Avian use of perennial biomass feedstocks as post-breeding and migratory stopover habitat. PLoS One, 6, 2011, e16941, 10.1371/journal.pone.0016941.
225. [225] Robertson, B.A., Doran, P.J., Loomis, L.R., Robertson, J.R., Schemske, D.W., Perennial biomass feedstocks enhance avian diversity. GCB Bioenergy 3 (2011), 235–246, 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2010.01080.x.
226. [226] Robertson, B.A., Porter, C., Landis, D.A., Schemske, D.W., Agroenergy crops influence the diversity, biomass, and guild structure of terrestrial arthropod communities. BioEnergy Res 5 (2011), 179–188, 10.1007/s12155-011-9161-3.
227. [227] Robertson, B.A., Landis, D.A., Sillett, T.S., Loomis, E.R., Rice, R.A., Perennial Agroenergy feedstocks as en route habitat for spring migratory birds. Bioenergy Res 6 (2013), 311–320, 10.1007/s12155-012-9258-3.
228. [228] Fargione, J., Is bioenergy for the birds? An evaluation of alternative future bioenergy landscapes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107 (2010), 18745–18746, 10.1073/pnas.1014045107.
229. [229] Meehan, T.D., Hurlbert, A.H., Gratton, C., Bird communities in future bioenergy landscapes of the Upper Midwest. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107 (2010), 18533–18538, 10.1073/pnas.1008475107.
230. [230] Bellamy, P.E., Croxton, P.J., Heard, M.S., Hinsley, S.A., Hulmes, L., Hulmes, S., et al. The impact of growing miscanthus for biomass on farmland bird populations. Biomass Bioenergy 33 (2009), 191–199, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2008.07.001.
231. [231] Rowe, R.L., Street, N.R., Taylor, G., Identifying potential environmental impacts of large-scale deployment of dedicated bioenergy crops in the UK. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 13 (2009), 271–290, 10.1016/j.rser.2007.07.008.
232. [232] Bennett, A.B., Isaacs, R., Landscape composition influences pollinators and pollination services in perennial biofuel plantings. Agric Ecosyst Environ 193 (2014), 1–8, 10.1016/j.agee.2014.04.016.
233. [233] Werling, B.P., Meehan, T.D., Gratton, C., Landis, D.A., Influence of habitat and landscape perenniality on insect natural enemies in three candidate biofuel crops. Biol Control 59 (2011), 304–312, 10.1016/j.biocontrol.2011.06.014.
234. 2 fluxes, changes in surface albedo and biodiversity impacts from establishment of a miscanthus plantation. J Environ Manag 146 (2014), 346–354, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.06.033.
235. [235] Evans, S.G., Kelley, L.C., Potts, M.D., The potential impact of second-generation biofuel landscapes on at-risk species in the US. GCB Bioenergy 7 (2015), 337–348.
236. [236] Wright, C.K., Wimberly, M.C., Recent land use change in the Western Corn Belt threatens grasslands and wetlands. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110 (2013), 4134–4139, 10.1073/pnas.1215404110.
237. [237] Zah, R., Böni, H., Gauch, M., Hischier, R., Lehmann, M., Wäger, P., Life cycle assessment of energy products: environmental assessment of biofuels. 2007, EPFL, Lausanne.
238. [238] von Blottnitz, H., Curran, M.A., A review of assessments conducted on bio-ethanol as a transportation fuel from a net energy, greenhouse gas, and environmental life cycle perspective. J Clean Prod 15 (2007), 607–619, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2006.03.002.
239. [239] Menichetti, E., Otto, M., Energy balance and Greenhouse Gas Emissions of bio- fuels from a product life-cycle perspective. Howarth, R.W., Bringezu, S., (eds.) Biofuels: environmental consequences and interactions with changing land use, 2009, Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE), Paris, 81–109.
240. [240] Davis, S.C., Parton, W.J., Grosso, S.J. Del, Keough, C., Marx, E., Adler, P.R., et al. Impact of second-generation biofuel agriculture on greenhouse-gas emissions in the corn-growing regions of the US. Front Ecol Environ 10 (2012), 69–74, 10.1890/110003.
241. [241] Borrion, A.L., McManus, M.C., Hammond, G.P., Environmental life cycle assessment of bioethanol production from wheat straw. Biomass Bioenergy 47 (2012), 9–19, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.10.017.
242. [242] Acquaye, A.A., Sherwen, T., Genovese, A., Kuylenstierna, J., Lenny Koh, S., McQueen-Mason, S., Biofuels and their potential to aid the UK towards achieving emissions reduction policy targets. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16 (2012), 5414–5422, 10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.046.
243. [243] Wiloso, E.I., Heijungs, R., de Snoo, G.R., LCA of second generation bioethanol: a review and some issues to be resolved for good LCA practice. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16 (2012), 5295–5308, 10.1016/j.rser.2012.04.035.
244. [244] Menten, F., Chèze, B., Patouillard, L., Bouvart, F., A review of LCA greenhouse gas emissions results for advanced biofuels: the use of meta-regression analysis. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 26 (2013), 108–134, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.04.021.
245. [245] Manik, Y., Halog, A., A meta-analytic review of life cycle assessment and flow analyses studies of palm oil biodiesel. Integr Environ Assess Manag 9 (2013), 134–141, 10.1002/ieam.1362.
246. [246] Tsiropoulos, I., Faaij, A.P.C., Seabra, J.E.A., Lundquist, L., Schenker, U., Briois, J.-F., et al. Life cycle assessment of sugarcane ethanol production in India in comparison to Brazil. Int J Life Cycle Assess 19 (2014), 1049–1067, 10.1007/s11367-014-0714-5.
247. [247] Shonnard, D.R., Klemetsrud, B., Sacramento-Rivero, J., Navarro-Pineda, F., Hilbert, J., Handler, R., et al. A review of environmental life cycle assessments of liquid transportation biofuels in the Pan American Region. Environ Manage 56 (2015), 1356–1376, 10.1007/s00267-015-0543-8.
248. [248] Sieverding, H.L., Bailey, L.M., Hengen, T.J., Clay, D.E., Stone, J.J., Meta-analysis of soybean-based biodiesel. J Environ Qual, 44, 2015, 1038, 10.2134/jeq2014.07.0320.
249. [249] Bailis, R.E., Baka, J.E., Greenhouse gas emissions and land use change from Jatropha curcas-based jet fuel in Brazil. Environ Sci Technol 44 (2010), 8684–8691, 10.1021/es1019178.
250. [250] Fargione, J., Hill, J., Tilman, D., Polasky, S., Hawthorne, P., Land clearing and the biofuel carbon debt. Science 319 (2008), 1235–1238, 10.1126/science.1152747.
251. [251] Gibbs, H.K., Johnston, M., Foley, J.A., Holloway, T., Monfreda, C., Ramankutty, N., et al. Carbon payback times for crop-based biofuel expansion in the tropics: the effects of changing yield and technology. Environ Res Lett, 3, 2008, 034001, 10.1088/1748-9326/3/3/034001.
252. [252] Elshout, P.M.F., van Zelm, R., Balkovic, J., Obersteiner, M., Schmid, E., Skalsky, R., et al. Greenhouse-gas payback times for crop-based biofuels. Nat Clim Change 5 (2015), 604–610, 10.1038/nclimate2642.
253. 2 emissions: Case studies in Tropical America, Africa and Southeast Asia. Ecol Soc, 16, 2011, 14.
254. [254] Loarie, S.R., Lobell, D.B., Asner, G.P., Mu, Q., Field, C.B., Direct impacts on local climate of sugar-cane expansion in Brazil. Nat Clim Change 1 (2011), 105–109, 10.1038/nclimate1067.
255. [255] Ramdani, F., Moffiet, T., Hino, M., Local surface temperature change due to expansion of oil palm plantation in Indonesia. Clim Change 123 (2014), 189–200, 10.1007/s10584-013-1045-4.
256. [256] Caiazzo, F., Malina, R., Staples, M.D., Wolfe, P.J., Yim, S.H.L., Barrett, S.R.H., Quantifying the climate impacts of albedo changes due to biofuel production: a comparison with biogeochemical effects. Environ Res Lett, 9, 2014, 024015, 10.1088/1748-9326/9/2/024015.
257. [257] Macedo, M.N., Coe, M.T., DeFries, R., Uriarte, M., Brando, P.M., Neill, C., et al. Land-use-driven stream warming in southeastern Amazonia. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci, 368, 2013, 20120153, 10.1098/rstb.2012.0153.
258. [258] Georgescu, M., Lobell, D.B., Field, C.B., Potential impact of U.S. biofuels on regional climate. Geophys Res Lett, 36, 2009, L21806, 10.1029/2009GL040477.
259. [259] Georgescu, M., Lobell, D.B., Field, C.B., Mahalov, A., Simulated hydroclimatic impacts of projected Brazilian sugarcane expansion. Geophys Res Lett 40 (2013), 972–977, 10.1002/grl.50206.
260. [260] RFA, The Gallagher review of the indirect effects of biofuels production. St Leonards-on-Sea: Renewable Fuels Agency (RFA), 2008.
261. [261] Achten, W.M.J., Vandenbempt, P., Almeida, J., Mathijs, E., Muys, B., Life cycle assessment of a palm oil system with simultaneous production of biodiesel and cooking oil in Cameroon. Environ Sci Technol 44 (2010), 4809–4815, 10.1021/es100067p.
262. [262] de Souza, S.P., Pacca, S., de Ávila, M.T., Borges, J.L.B., Greenhouse gas emissions and energy balance of palm oil biofuel. Renew Energy 35 (2010), 2552–2561, 10.1016/j.renene.2010.03.028.
263. [263] Vang Rasmussen, L., Rasmussen, K., Bech Bruun, T., Impacts of Jatropha-based biodiesel production on above and below-ground carbon stocks: a case study from Mozambique. Energy Policy 51 (2012), 728–736, 10.1016/j.enpol.2012.09.029.
264. [264] Romijn, H.A., Land clearing and greenhouse gas emissions from Jatropha biofuels on African Miombo Woodlands. Energy Policy 39 (2011), 5751–5762, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.07.041.
265. [265] von Maltitz, G.P., Sugrue, A., Gush, M.B., Everson, C., Borman, G.D., Blanchard, R., Environmental and socioeconomic considerations for jatropha growing in southern Africa. Gasparatos, A., Stromberg, P., (eds.) Socioeconomic and environmental impacts of biofuels: Evidence from developing nations, 2012, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 278–305.
266. [266] Skutsch, M., de los, Rios E., Solis, S., Riegelhaupt, E., Hinojosa, D., Gerfert, S., et al. Jatropha in Mexico: environmental and social impacts of an incipient biofuel program. Ecol Soc, 16, 2011, 11, 10.5751/ES-04448-160411.
267. [267] Bailis, R., Mccarthy, H., Carbon impacts of direct land use change in semiarid woodlands converted to biofuel plantations in India and Brazil. GCB Bioenergy 3 (2011), 449–460.
268. [268] Thurlow, J., Branca, G., Felix, E., Maltsoglou, I., Rincón, L.E., Producing biofuels in low-income countries: an integrated environmental and economic Assessment for Tanzania. Environ Resour Econ 64 (2016), 153–171, 10.1007/s10640-014-9863-z.
269. [269] Vang Rasmussen, L., Rasmussen, K., Birch-Thomsen, T., Kristensen, S.B.P., Traoré, O., The effect of cassava-based bioethanol production on above-ground carbon stocks: A case study from Southern Mali. Energy Policy 41 (2012), 575–583, 10.1016/j.enpol.2011.11.019.
270. [270] Kim, H., Kim, S., Dale, B.E., Biofuels, Land Use Change, and Greenhouse Gas Emissions: Some Unexplored Variables. Environ Sci Technol 43 (2009), 961–967, 10.1021/es802681k.
271. [271] Yang, Y., Suh, S., Marginal yield, technological advances, and emissions timing in corn ethanol's carbon payback time. Int J Life Cycle Assess 20 (2014), 226–232, 10.1007/s11367-014-0827-x.
272. [272] Gelfand, I., Sahajpal, R., Zhang, X., Izaurralde, R.C., Gross, K.L., Robertson, G.P., Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest. Nature 493 (2013), 514–517.
273. [273] Souza, G.M., Joly, C.A., (eds.) Bioenergy and sustainability: bridging the gaps, 2015, Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE), Paris.
274. [274] Hess, P., Johnston, M., Brown-Steiner, B., Holloway, T.D., Andrade, J.B., Artaxo, P., Air quality issues associated with biofuel production and use. Howarth, R.W., Bringezu, S., (eds.) Biofuels: Environmental Consequences and Interactions with Changing Land Use, 2009, Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE), Paris, 169–194.
275. [275] Millet, D.B., Apel, E., Henze, D.K., Hill, J., Marshall, J.D., Singh, H.B., et al. Natural and anthropogenic ethanol sources inNorth America and potential atmospheric impacts of ethanol fuel use. Environ Sci Technol 46 (2012), 8484–8492, 10.1021/es300162u.
276. [276] Sunde, K., Brekke, A., Solberg, B., Environmental impacts and costs of woody Biomass-to-Liquid (BTL) production and use: a review. For Policy Econ 13 (2011), 591–602, 10.1016/j.forpol.2011.05.008.
277. [277] Tsao, C.-C., Campbell, J.E., Mena-Carrasco, M., Spak, S.N., Carmichael, G.R., Chen, Y., Increased estimates of air-pollution emissions from Brazilian sugar-cane ethanol. Nat Clim Change 2 (2011), 53–57, 10.1038/nclimate1325.
278. [278] Cançado, J.E.D., Saldiva, P.H.N., Pereira, L.A.A., Lara, L.B.L.S., Artaxo, P., Martinelli, L.A., et al. The impact of sugar cane-burning emissions on the respiratory system of children and the elderly. Environ Health Perspect 114 (2006), 725–729.
279. [279] Lara, L., Artaxo, P., Martinelli, L., Camargo, P., Victoria, R., Ferraz, E., Properties of aerosols from sugar-cane burning emissions in Southeastern Brazil. Atmos Environ 39 (2005), 4627–4637, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2005.04.026.
280. [280] Obidzinski, K., Andriani, R., Komarudin, H., Andrianto, A., Environmental and social impacts of oil palm plantations and their implications for biofuel production in Indonesia. Ecol Soc, 17, 2012, 25.
281. [281] Ashworth, K., Wild, O., Hewitt, C.N., Impacts of biofuel cultivation on mortality and crop yields. Nat Clim Change 3 (2013), 492–496, 10.1038/nclimate1788.
282. [282] Monteleone, M., Cammerino, A.R.B., Garofalo, P., Delivand, M.K., Straw-to-soil or straw-to-energy? An optimal trade off in a long term sustainability perspective. Appl Energy 154 (2015), 891–899, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.04.108.
283. [283] Whittaker, C., Borrion, A.L., Newnes, L., McManus, M., The renewable energy directive and cereal residues. Appl Energy 122 (2014), 207–215, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.01.091.
284. [284] Silalertruksa, T., Gheewala, S.H., A comparative LCA of rice straw utilization for fuels and fertilizer in Thailand. Bioresour Technol 150 (2013), 412–419, 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.09.015.
285. [285] Martinez-Hernandez, E., Ibrahim, M.H., Leach, M., Sinclair, P., Campbell, G.M., Sadhukhan, J., Environmental sustainability analysis of UK whole-wheat bioethanol and CHP systems. Biomass Bioenergy 50 (2013), 52–64, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.01.001.
286. [286] Gnansounou, E., Vaskan, P., Pachón, E.R., Comparative techno-economic assessment and LCA of selected integrated sugarcane-based biorefineries. Bioresour Technol 196 (2015), 364–375, 10.1016/j.biortech.2015.07.072.
287. [287] Canter, C.E., Dunn, J.B., Han, J., Wang, Z., Wang, M., Policy implications of allocation methods in the life cycle analysis of integrated corn and corn stover ethanol production. BioEnergy Res 9 (2016), 77–87, 10.1007/s12155-015-9664-4.
288. [288] Boldrin, A., Astrup, T., GHG sustainability compliance of rapeseed-based biofuels produced in a Danish multi-output biorefinery system. Biomass Bioenergy 75 (2015), 83–93, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2015.01.023.
289. [289] Souza, S.P., Seabra, J.E.A., Environmental benefits of the integrated production of ethanol and biodiesel. Appl Energy 102 (2013), 5–12, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2012.09.016.
290. [290] Gunkel, G., Kosmol, J., Sobral, M., Rohn, H., Montenegro, S., Aureliano, J., Sugar Cane industry as a source of water pollution: case study on the situation in Ipojuca River, Pernambuco, Brazil. Water Air Soil Pollut 180 (2006), 261–269, 10.1007/s11270-006-9268-x.
291. [291] Muyibi, S.A., Ambali, A.R., Eissa, G.S., Development-induced water pollution in Malaysia: policy implications from an econometric analysis. Water Policy 10 (2008), 193–206, 10.2166/wp.2008.039.
292. [292] Wu, T.A., Mohammad, A.W., Jahim, J.M., Anuar, N., Pollution control technologies for the treatment of palm oil mill effluent (POME) through end-of-pipe processes. J Environ Manage 91 (2010), 1467–1490.
293. [293] Love, B., Nejadhashemi, A.P., Environmental impact analysis of biofuel crops expansion in the saginaw river watershed. J Biobased Mater Bioenergy 5 (2011), 30–54, 10.1166/jbmb.2011.1119.
294. [294] Love, B.J., Einheuser, M.D., Nejadhashemi, A.P., Effects on aquatic and human health due to large scale bioenergy crop expansion. Sci Total Environ 409 (2011), 3215–3229, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.05.007.
295. [295] Wu, M., Demissie, Y., Yan, E., Simulated impact of future biofuel production on water quality and water cycle dynamics in the Upper Mississippi river basin. Biomass Bioenergy 41 (2012), 44–56, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.01.030.
296. [296] Jager, H.I., Baskaran, L.M., Schweizer, P.E., Turhollow, A.F., Brandt, C.C., Srinivasan, R., Forecasting changes in water quality in rivers associated with growing biofuels in the Arkansas-White-Red river drainage, USA. GCB Bioenergy 7 (2015), 774–784, 10.1111/gcbb.12169.
297. [297] Donner, S.D., Kucharik, C.J., Corn-based ethanol production compromises goal of reducing nitrogen export by the Mississippi River. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105 (2008), 4513–4518, 10.1073/pnas.0708300105.
298. [298] Van Wijnen, J., WPMF, Ivens, Kroeze, C., Löhr, A.J., Coastal eutrophication in Europe caused by production of energy crops. Sci Total Environ 511 (2015), 101–111, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.12.032.
299. [299] Strokal, M.P., Kroeze, C., Kopilevych, V.A., Voytenko, L.V., Reducing future nutrient inputs to the Black Sea. Sci Total Environ 466–467 (2014), 253–264, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.07.004.
300. [300] Nordborg, M., Cederberg, C., Berndes, G., Modeling potential freshwater ecotoxicity impacts due to pesticide use in biofuel feedstock production: the cases of maize, rapeseed, salix, soybean, sugar cane, and wheat. Environ Sci Technol 48 (2014), 11379–11388, 10.1021/es502497p.
301. [301] Bunzel, K., Schäfer, R.B., Thrän, D., Kattwinkel, M., Pesticide runoff from energy crops: A threat to aquatic invertebrates?. Sci Total Environ 537 (2015), 187–196, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.08.011.
302. [302] Raghu, S., Anderson, R.C., Daehler, C.C., Davis, A.S., Wiedenmann, R.N., Simberloff, D., et al. Ecology. Adding biofuels to the invasive species fire?. Science, 313, 2006, 1742, 10.1126/science.1129313.
303. [303] Pyke, C.R., Thomas, R., Porter, R.D., Hellmann, J.J., Dukes, J.S., Lodge, D.M., et al. Current practices and future opportunities for policy on climate change and invasive species. Conserv Biol 22 (2008), 585–592, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2008.00956.x.
304. [304] Buddenhagen, C.E., Chimera, C., Clifford, P., Assessing biofuel crop invasiveness: a case study. PLoS One, 4, 2009, 10.1371/journal.pone.0005261.
305. [305] Genovesi, P., European biofuel policies may increase biological invasions: the risk of inertia. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 3 (2011), 66–70, 10.1016/j.cosust.2010.12.001.
306. [306] Smith, A.L., Klenk, N., Wood, S., Hewitt, N., Henriques, I., Yan, N., et al. Second generation biofuels and bioinvasions: an evaluation of invasive risks and policy responses in the United States and Canada. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 27 (2013), 30–42, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.06.013.
307. [307] Hager, H.A., Rupert, R., Quinn, L.D., Newman, J.A., Escaped Miscanthus sacchariflorus reduces the richness and diversity of vegetation and the soil seed bank. Biol Invasions 17 (2015), 1833–1847, 10.1007/s10530-014-0839-2.
308. [308] Barney, J.N., Mann, J.J., Kyser, G.B., DiTomaso, J.M., Assessing habitat susceptibility and resistance to invasion by the bioenergy crops switchgrass and Miscanthus × giganteus in California. Biomass Bioenergy 40 (2012), 143–154, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.02.013.
309. [309] Robertson, B.A., Rice, R.A., Sillett, T.S., Ribic, C.A., Babcock, B.A., Landis, D.A., et al. Are agrofuels a conservation threat or opportunity for grassland birds in the United States?. Condor 114 (2012), 679–688, 10.1525/cond.2012.110136.
310. [310] Matlaga, D.P., Davis, A.S., Minimizing invasive potential of Miscanthus × giganteus grown for bioenergy: identifying demographic thresholds for population growth and spread. J Appl Ecol 50 (2013), 479–487, 10.1111/1365-2664.12057.
311. [311] von Maltitz, G., Gasparatos, A., Fabricius, C., The rise, fall and potential resilience benefits of Jatropha in Southern Africa. Sustainability 6 (2014), 3615–3643, 10.3390/su6063615.
312. [312] Negussie, A., Achten, W.M.J., Aerts, R., Norgrove, L., Sinkala, T., Hermy, M., et al. Invasiveness risk of the tropical biofuel crop Jatropha curcas L. into adjacent land use systems: from the rumors to the experimental facts. GCB Bioenergy 5 (2013), 419–430, 10.1111/gcbb.12011.
313. [313] Negussie, A., Achten, W.M.J., Norgrove, L., Hermy, M., Muys, B., Invasiveness risk of biofuel crops using Jatropha curcas L. as a model species. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefining 7 (2013), 485–498, 10.1002/bbb.1416.
314. [314] Negussie, A., Nacro, S., Achten, W.M.J., Norgrove, L., Kenis, M., Hadgu, K.M., et al. Insufficient evidence of Jatropha curcas L. invasiveness: experimental observations in Burkina Faso, West Africa. BioEnergy Res 8 (2014), 570–580, 10.1007/s12155-014-9544-3.
315. [315] Joly, C.A., Huntley, B.J., Verdade, L.M., Dale, V.H., Mace, G., Muok, B., Ravindranath, N.H., Biofuel impacts on biodiversity and ecosystem services. Souza, G.M., Joly, C.A., (eds.) Bioenergy and Sustainability: Bridging the gaps, 2015, Scientific Committee on Problems of the Environment (SCOPE), Paris, 554–580.
316. [316] Davis, S.C., Boddey, R.M., Alves, B.J.R., Cowie, A.L., George, B.H., Ogle, S.M., et al. Management swing potential for bioenergy crops. GCB Bioenergy 5 (2013), 623–638, 10.1111/gcbb.12042.
317. [317] Dale, V.H., Kline, K.L., Wright, L.L., Perlack, R.D., Downing, M., Graham, R.L., Interactions among bioenergy feedstock choices, landscape dynamics, and land use. Ecol Appl 21 (2011), 1039–1054, 10.1890/09-0501.1.
318. [318] Myers, M.C., Mason, J.T., Hoksch, B.J., Cambardella, C.A., Pfrimmer, J.D., Birds and butterflies respond to soil-induced habitat heterogeneity in experimental plantings of tallgrass prairie species managed as agroenergy crops in Iowa, USA. J Appl Ecol 52 (2015), 1176–1187, 10.1111/1365-2664.12503.
319. [319] Chauvat, M., Perez, G., Hedde, M., Lamy, I., Establishment of bioenergy crops on metal contaminated soils stimulates belowground fauna. Biomass Bioenergy 62 (2014), 207–211, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.01.042.
320. [320] Zhao, J., Wan, S., Fu, S., Wang, X., Wang, M., Liang, C., et al. Effects of understory removal and nitrogen fertilization on soil microbial communities in Eucalyptus plantations. For Ecol Manag 310 (2013), 80–86, 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.08.013.
321. [321] Behrman, K.D., Juenger, T.E., Kiniry, J.R., Keitt, T.H., Spatial land use trade-offs for maintenance of biodiversity, biofuel, and agriculture. Landsc Ecol, 2015, 10.1007/s10980-015-0225-1.
322. [322] Strassburg, B.B.N., Latawiec, A.E., Barioni, L.G., Nobre, C. a, da Silva, V.P., Valentim, J.F., et al. When enough should be enough: improving the use of current agricultural lands could meet production demands and spare natural habitats in Brazil. Glob Environ Change 28 (2014), 84–97, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.001.
323. [323] West, N.M., Matlaga, D.P., Davis, A.S., Managing Spread from Rhizome Fragments is Key to Reducing Invasiveness in Miscanthus × giganteus. Invasive Plant Sci Manag 7 (2014), 517–525, 10.1614/IPSM-D-14-00018.1.
324. [324] Hennenberg, K.J., Dragisic, C., Haye, S., Hewson, J., Semroc, B., Savy, C., et al. The power of bioenergy-related standards to protect biodiversity. Conserv Biol 24 (2010), 412–423, 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2009.01380.x.
325. [325] Koh, L.P., Ghazoul, J., Spatially explicit scenario analysis for reconciling agricultural expansion, forest protection, and carbon conservation in Indonesia. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 107 (2010), 11140–11144, 10.1073/pnas.1012681107.
326. [326] Gelfand, I., Sahajpal, R., Zhang, X., Izaurralde, R.C., Gross, K.L., Robertson, G.P., Sustainable bioenergy production from marginal lands in the US Midwest. Nature 493 (2013), 514–517, 10.1038/nature11811.
327. [327] Harvolk, S., Kornatz, P., Otte, A., Simmering, D., Using existing landscape data to assess the ecological potential of miscanthus cultivation in a marginal landscape. GCB Bioenergy 6 (2014), 227–241, 10.1111/gcbb.12078.
328. [328] Dillen, S.Y., Djomo, S.N., Al Afas, N., Vanbeveren, S., Ceulemans, R., Biomass yield and energy balance of a short-rotation poplar coppice with multiple clones on degraded land during 16 years. Biomass Bioenergy 56 (2013), 157–165, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.04.019.
329. [329] Gregersen, P., Brix, H., Zero-discharge of nutrients and water in a willow dominated constructed wetland. Water Sci Technol 44 (2001), 407–412.
330. [330] Nsanganwimana, F., Pourrut, B., Mench, M., Douay, F., Suitability of Miscanthus species for managing inorganic and organic contaminated land and restoring ecosystem services. A review. J Environ Manag 143 (2014), 123–134, 10.1016/j.jenvman.2014.04.027.
331. [331] Pidlisnyuk, V., Stefanovska, T., Lewis, E.E., Erickson, L.E., Davis, L.C., Miscanthus as a productive biofuel crop for phytoremediation. Cr Rev Plant Sci 33 (2014), 1–19.
332. [332] Marrugo-Negrete, J., Durango-Hernández, J., Pinedo-Hernández, J., Olivero-Verbel, J., Díez, S., Phytoremediation of mercury-contaminated soils by Jatropha curcas. Chemosphere 127 (2015), 58–63, 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2014.12.073.
333. [333] Berndes, G., Börjesson, P., Ostwald, M., Palm, M., Multifunctional biomass production systems: an overview with presentation of specific applications in India and Sweden. Biofuels Bioprod Biorefining 2 (2008), 16–25, 10.1002/bbb.52.
334. [334] Koh, L.P., Levang, P., Ghazoul, J., Designer landscapes for sustainable biofuels. Trends Ecol Evol 24 (2009), 431–438, 10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.012.
335. [335] Porter, J., Costanza, R., Sandhu, H., Sigsgaard, L., Wratten, S., The value of producing food, energy, and ecosystem services within an agro-ecosystem. AMBIO 38 (2009), 186–193, 10.1579/0044-7447-38.4.186.
336. [336] Applied ecology and human dimensions in biological conservation. Verdade, L.M., Lyra-Jorge, M.C., Piña, C.I., (eds.), 2014, Springer, Berlin, 10.1007/978-3-642-54751-5.
337. [337] Jarchow, M.E., Liebman, M., Dhungel, S., Dietzel, R., Sundberg, D., Anex, R.P., et al. Trade-offs among agronomic, energetic, and environmental performance characteristics of corn and prairie bioenergy cropping systems. GCB Bioenergy 7 (2015), 57–71, 10.1111/gcbb.12096.
338. [338] Diekötter, T., Peter, F., Jauker, B., Wolters, V., Jauker, F., Mass-flowering crops increase richness of cavity-nesting bees and wasps in modern agro-ecosystems. GCB Bioenergy, 2013, 219–226, 10.1111/gcbb.12080.
339. [339] Sayer, J., Sunderland, T., Ghazoul, J., Pfund, J.-L., Sheil, D., Meijaard, E., et al. Ten principles for a landscape approach to reconciling agriculture, conservation, and other competing land uses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110 (2013), 8349–8356, 10.1073/pnas.1210595110.
340. [340] Di Lucia, L., External governance and the EU policy for sustainable biofuels, the case of Mozambique. Energy Policy 38 (2010), 7395–7403, 10.1016/j.enpol.2010.08.015.
341. [341] Lovett, J.C., Hards, S., Clancy, J., Snell, C., Multiple objectives in biofuels sustainability policy. Energy Environ Sci 4 (2011), 261–268, 10.1039/C0EE00041H.
342. [342] Esteban, M., Leary, D., Zhang, Q., Utama, A., Ishihara, K., The greening of the offshore energy sector in the North Sea. Int J Labour Res 2 (2011), 245–268.
343. [343] CEBR, The economic case for a Tidal Lagoon Industry in the UK: a scenario-based assessment of the macroeconomic impacts of tidal lagoons for power generation on the UK economy. 2014, Cebr, London.
344. [344] Kidd, I.M., Fischer, A., Chai, S., Davis, J.A., A scenario-based approach to evaluating potential environmental impacts following a tidal barrage installation. Ocean Coast Manag 116 (2015), 9–19, 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2015.06.016.
345. [345] Owen, E., Environment Agency boss opposes Severn Barrage. New Civ Eng J, 1, 2008, 5.
346. [346] Esteban, M., Leary, D., Current developments and future prospects of offshore wind and ocean energy. Appl Energy 90 (2012), 128–136, 10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.06.011.
347. [347] Leary, D., Esteban, M., Recent developments in offshore renewable energy in the Asia-Pacific Region. Ocean Dev Int Law 42 (2011), 94–119, 10.1080/00908320.2010.521039.
348. [348] Isaacman, L., Lee, K., Current state of knowledge on the environmental impacts of tidal and wave energy technology in Canada. 2009, Bedford Institute of Oceanography, Dartmouth.
349. [349] Inger, R., Attrill, M.J., Bearhop, S., Broderick, A.C., James Grecian, W., Hodgson, D.J., et al. Marine renewable energy: potential benefits to biodiversity? An urgent call for research. J Appl Ecol 46 (2009), 1145–1153, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01697.x.
350. [350] HCECCC, The future of marine renewables in the UK (Volume 1). 2012, House of Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee (HCECCC), London.
351. [351] D. Magagna, A. Uihlein JRC Ocean Energy Status Report, Ispra: Joint Research Centre of the Euroipean Commission (JRC); 2014.
352. [352] Wolf, J., Walkington, I.A., Holt, J., Burrows, R., Environmental impacts of tidal power schemes. Proc Inst Civil Eng – Marit Eng 162 (2009), 165–177.
353. [353] Shields, M.A., Woolf, D.K., Grist, E.P.M., Kerr, S.A., Jackson, A.C., Harris, R.E., et al. Marine renewable energy: the ecological implications of altering the hydrodynamics of the marine environment. Ocean Coast Manag 54 (2011), 2–9, 10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2010.10.036.
354. [354] Boehlert, G.W., Gill, A.B., Environmental and ecological effects of ocean renewable energy development: a current synthesis. Oceanography 23 (2010), 68–81.
355. [355] OSPAR Commision, Assessment of the environmental impact of offshore wind-farms. 2008, OSPCAR Commission, London.
356. [356] Offshore Wind, D.E.A., Farms and the environment: Danish experience from horns rev and hysted. 2006, Danish Energy Authority (DEA), Copenhagen.
357. [357] OEERA. Fundy Tidal Energy Strategic Environmental Assessment: Final Report. Halifax:Offshore Energy Environmental Research Association.; 2008.
358. [358] Nautricity, Environmental Appraisal for the Argyll Tidal Demonstrator Project. 2013, Nautricity, Glasgow.
359. [359] Esteban, M., Webersik, C., Leary, D., Thompson-Pomeroy, D., Innovation in responding to climate change : nanotechnology, ocean energy and forestry. 2008, United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies, Yokohama.
360. [360] Lindeboom, H.J., Kouwenhoven, H.J., Bergman, M.J.N., Bouma, S., Brasseur, S., Daan, R., et al. Short-term ecological effects of an offshore wind farm in the Dutch coastal zona; a compilation. Environ Res Lett, 6, 2011, 035101, 10.1088/1748-9326/6/3/035101.
361. [361] Plonczkier, P., Simms, I.C., Radar monitoring of migrating pink-footed geese: behavioural responses to offshore wind farm development. J Appl Ecol 49 (2012), 1187–1194, 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2012.02181.x.
362. [362] Coates, D.A., Deschutter, Y., Vincx, M., Vanaverbeke, J., Enrichment and shifts in macrobenthic assemblages in an offshore wind farm area in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Mar Environ Res 95 (2014), 1–12, 10.1016/j.marenvres.2013.12.008.
363. [363] De Backer, A., Van Hoey, G., Coates, D., Vanaverbeke, J., Hostens, K., Similar diversity-disturbance responses to different physical impacts: three cases of small-scale biodiversity increase in the Belgian part of the North Sea). Mar Pollut Bull 84 (2014), 251–262, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.05.006.
364. [364] Krone, R., Gutow, L., Joschko, T.J., Schröder, A., Epifauna dynamics at an offshore foundation: implications of future wind power farming in the North Sea. Mar Environ Res 85 (2013), 1–12, 10.1016/j.marenvres.2012.12.004.
365. [365] Reubens, J.T., De Rijcke, M., Degraer, S., Vincx, M., Diel variation in feeding and movement patterns of juvenile Atlantic cod at offshore wind farms. J Sea Res 85 (2014), 214–221, 10.1016/j.seares.2013.05.005.
366. [366] Reubens, J.T., Pasotti, F., Degraer, S., Vincx, M., Residency, site fidelity and habitat use of Atlantic cod (Gadus morhua) at an offshore wind farm using acoustic telemetry. Mar Environ Res 90 (2013), 128–135, 10.1016/j.marenvres.2013.07.001.
367. [367] Stenberg, C., Støttrup, J.G., Van Deurs, M., Berg, C.W., Dinesen, G.E., Mosegaard, H., Grome, T.M., Leonhard, S.B., Long-term effects of an offshore wind farm in the North Sea on fish communities. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 528 (2015), 257–265.
368. [368] Witt, M.J., Sheehan, E.V., Bearhop, S., Broderick, A.C., Conley, D.C., Cotterell, S.P., et al. Assessing wave energy effects on biodiversity: the Wave Hub experience. Philos Trans R Soc A Math Phys Eng Sci 370 (2012), 502–529, 10.1098/rsta.2011.0265.
369. [369] Zanuttigh, B., Angelelli, E., Bellotti, G., Romano, A., Krontira, Y., Troianos, D., et al. Boosting blue growth in a mild sea: analysis of the synergies produced by a multi-purpose offshore installation in the Northern Adriatic, Italy. Sustainability 7 (2015), 6804–6853, 10.3390/su7066804.
370. [370] Broadhurst, M., Orme, C.D.L., Spatial and temporal benthic species assemblage responses with a deployed marine tidal energy device: A small scaled study. Mar Environ Res 99 (2014), 76–84, 10.1016/j.marenvres.2014.03.012.
371. [371] Fijn, R.C., Krijgsveld, K.L., Poot, M.J.M., Dirksen, S., Bird movements at rotor heights measured continuously with vertical radar at a Dutch offshore wind farm. Int J Avian Sci 157 (2015), 558–566, 10.1111/ibi.12259.
372. [372] Aumüller, R., Boos, K., Freienstein, S., Hill, K., Hill, R., Description of a bird strike event and its causes at a research platform in the German bight, North Sea [Beschreibung eines vogelschlagereignisses und seiner ursachen an einer forschungsplattform in der deutschen bucht]. Vogelwarte 49 (2011), 9–16.
373. [373] Vanermen, N., Onkelinx, T., Courtens, W., Van de, walle M., Verstraete, H., Stienen, E.W.M., Seabird avoidance and attraction at an offshore wind farm in the Belgian part of the North Sea. Hydrobiologia 756 (2014), 51–61, 10.1007/s10750-014-2088-x.
374. [374] Grecian, W.J., Inger, R., Attrill, M.J., Bearhop, S., Godley, B.J., Witt, M.J., et al. Potential impacts of wave-powered marine renewable energy installations on marine birds. Ibis 152 (2010), 683–697, 10.1111/j.1474-919X.2010.01048.x.
375. [375] Cada, G., Ahlgrimm, J., Bahleda, M., Bigford, T., Stavrakas, S.D., Hall, D., et al. Potential impacts of hydrokinetic and wave energy conversion technologies on aquatic environments. Fisheries 32 (2007), 174–181, 10.1577/1548-8446.
376. [376] Loring, P.H., Paton, P.W.C., Osenkowski, J.E., Gilliland, S.G., Savard, J.-P.L., Mcwilliams, S.R., Habitat use and selection of black scoters in southern New England and siting of offshore wind energy facilities. J Wildl Manag 78 (2014), 645–656, 10.1002/jwmg.696.
377. [377] A. Copping, L. Hanna, J. Whiting, S. Geerlofs, M. Grear, K. Blake, A. Coffey, M. Massaua, J. Brown-Saracino, H. Bettey Environmental Effects of Marine Energy Development around the World: Annex IV Final Report. Washington DC:Pacific Northwest National Laboratory; 2013.
378. [378] ORPC. Cobscook Bay tidal energy project: 2012 environmental monitoring report. Portland: Ocean Renewable Power Company; 2013.
379. [379] FORCE, Environmental Effects Monitoring Report: 2011-2013. 2013, Halifax:Fundy Ocean Research Center for Energy, FORCE.
380. [380] Royal Haskoning. SeaGen Environmental Monitoring Programme: Final Report. Edinburg: Royal Haskoning);2011.
381. [381] Kadiri, M., Ahmadian, R., Bockelmann-Evans, B., Rauen, W., Falconer, R., A review of the potential water quality impacts of tidal renewable energy systems. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 16 (2012), 329–341, 10.1016/j.rser.2011.07.160.
382. [382] Langhamer, O., Haikonen, K., Sundberg, J., Wave power: Sustainable energy or environmentally costly? A review with special emphasis on linear wave energy converters. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 14 (2010), 1329–1335, 10.1016/j.rser.2009.11.016.
383. [383] Liu, C.C.K., Sou, I.M., Lin, H., Artificial upwelling and near-field mixing of deep-ocean water effluent. J Mar Env Eng 7 (2003), 1–14.
384. [384] U.S. Department of Energy. Report to Congress on the Potential Environmental Effects of Marine and Hydrokinetic Energy Technologies. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Energy; 2009.
385. [385] Mendes L., Palha A., Fortes C.J., Brito e Melo A, Sarmento A. Analysis of the Impact of a Pilot Zone for Wave Energy Conversion Offshore Portugal. 18th Int. Offshore Polar Eng. Conf., Vancouver: 2008.
386. [386] Lamadrid-Rose, Y., Boehlert, G.W., Effects of cold shock on egg, larval, and juvenile stages of tropical fishes: Potential impacts of ocean thermal energy conversion. Mar Environ Res 25 (1988), 175–193, 10.1016/0141-1136(88)90002-5.
387. [387] OERA, Marine Renewable Energy: Background Report to Support a Strategic Environmental Assessment (SEA) for the Cape Breton Coastal Region, inclusive of the Bras D'Or Lakes. Halifax. 2012, Offshore Energy Research Association.
388. [388] Thomsen, F., Luedemann, K., Piper, W., Judd, A., Kafemann, R., Potential effects of offshore wind farm noise on fish. Bioacoustics 17 (2008), 221–223, 10.1080/09524622.2008.9753825.
389. [389] Tougaard, J., Underwater noise from a wave energy converter is unlikely to affect marine mammals. PLoS One, 10, 2015, e0132391, 10.1371/journal.pone.0132391.
390. [390] Fraenkel P. Marine Current Turbines: Moving from Experimental Test Rigs to a Commercial Technology. 26th Int. Conf. Offshore Mech. Arct. Eng. San Diego; 2007. pp. 579-588 〈doi:10.1115/OMAE2007-29642〉.
391. [391] EWEA, The European offshore wind industry: key trends and statistics. 2014, 2015, European Wind Energy Association, Brussels.
392. [392] Zountouridou, E.I., Kiokes, G.C., Chakalis, S., Georgilakis, P.S., Hatziargyriou, N.D., Offshore floating wind parks in the deep waters of Mediterranean Sea. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 51 (2015), 433–448, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.06.027.
393. [393] Hogan, T.W., Linebaugh, C., Harmer, A., Steinbeck, J., A Field Program for Developing a Baseline Characterization of Ichthyoplankton Near a Potential OTEC Facility. Mar Technol Soc J 47 (2013), 137–141, 10.4031/MTSJ.47.4.9.
394. [394] OSPAR, Review of the Current State of Knowledge on the Environmental Impacts of the Location, Operation and Removal/Disposal of Offshore Wind-Farms. 2006, OSPAR Commission, London.
395. [395] Ashley, M.C., Mangi, S.C., Rodwell, L.D., The potential of offshore windfarms to act as marine protected areas – A systematic review of current evidence. Mar Policy 45 (2014), 301–309, 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.09.002.
396. [396] Bayer, P., Rybach, L., Blum, P., Brauchler, R., Review on life cycle environmental effects of geothermal power generation. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 26 (2013), 446–463, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.039.
397. [397] Moya, P., Rodríguez, E.M., Mainieri, A., Legal barriers to the utilization of geothermal energy in protected areas of Costa Rica. Trans Geoth Res Coun 30 (2006), 1059–1065.
398. [398] Pasqualetti, M.J., Geothermal energy and the environment: The global experience. Energy 5 (1980), 111–165.
399. [399] Shortall, R., Davidsdottir, B., Axelsson, G., A sustainability assessment framework for geothermal energy projects: development in Iceland, New Zealand and Kenya. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 50 (2015), 372–407, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.175.
400. [400] Shortall, R., Davidsdottir, B., Axelsson, G., Development of a sustainability assessment framework for geothermal energy projects. Energy Sustain Dev 27 (2015), 28–45, 10.1016/j.esd.2015.02.004.
401. [401] Lee, H., Protection policy for Hawaii's native wildlife during geothermal energy development. Environ Manag 10 (1986), 611–621.
402. [402] Mwangi, M.W., Environmental and socio-economic issues of geothermal development in Kenya. GRC Bull 2 (2010), 24–35.
403. [403] Chepkochei, L., Njoroge, F., Analysis of land use/cover changes in the Menengai landscape, geothermal prospect using landsat TM. Trans Geotherm Resour Counc 36 (2012), 621–624.
404. [404] Manyara, D., Mading, P., Environmental and social considerations in geothermal development: case study Menengai. 36, 2012, Moving towards green and clean economy. Trans. Geotherm. Resour. Counc, Kenya, 1227–1231.
405. [405] H. Guido-Sequeira, Geothermal Development in Protected Areas: Case History from Costa Rica. Pro World Geoth Cong 2015. Melbourne; 2015.
406. [406] Burns, B.R., Ward, J., Downs, T.M., Trampling impacts on thermotolerant vegetation of geothermal areas in New Zealand. Environ Manag 52 (2013), 1463–1473, 10.1007/s00267-013-0187-5.
407. [407] Duffield, W.A., Sass, J.H., Geothermal energy: clean power from the Earth's heat, 2003, Geological Survey, Reston: US.
408. [408] Barbier, E., Nature and technology of geothermal energy: a review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 1 (1997), 1–69, 10.1016/S1364-0321(97)00001-4.
409. [409] Bravi, M., Basosi, R., Environmental impact of electricity from selected geothermal power plants in Italy. J Clean Prod 66 (2014), 301–308, 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.015.
410. [410] Amponsah, N.Y., Troldborg, M., Kington, B., Aalders, I., Hough, R.L., Greenhouse gas emissions from renewable energy sources: a review of lifecycle considerations. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 39 (2014), 461–475.
411. [411] Loppi, S., Nascimbene, J., Monitoring H2S air pollution caused by the industrial exploitation of geothermal energy: the pitfall of using lichens as bioindicators. Environ Pollut 158 (2010), 2635–2639, 10.1016/j.envpol.2010.05.002.
412. [412] Bussotti, F., Tognelli, R., Montagni, G., Borghini, F., Bruschi, P., Tani, C., Response of Quercus pubescens leaves exposed to geothermal pollutant input in southern Tuscany (Italy). Environ Pollut 121 (2003), 349–361.
413. [413] Loppi, S., Paoli, L., Gaggi, C., Diversity of Epiphytic Lichens and Hg contents of Xanthoria parietina Thalli as monitors of geothermal air pollution in the Mt. Amiata Area (Central Italy). J Atmos Chem 53 (2006), 93–105, 10.1007/s10874-006-6648-y.
414. [414] Manzo, C., Salvini, R., Guastaldi, E., Nicolardi, V., Protano, G., Reflectance spectral analyses for the assessment of environmental pollution in the geothermal site of Mt. Amiata (Italy). Atmos Environ 79 (2013), 650–665, 10.1016/j.atmosenv.2013.06.038.
415. [415] Robinson, B.H., Brooks, R.R., Outred, H.A., Kirkman, J.H., Mercury and arsenic in trout from the Taupo Volcanic Zone and Waikato River. 7, 1995, Chem Spec Bioavailab, North Island, New Zealand, 27–32.
416. [416] INL.The Future of Geothermal Energy: Impact of Enhanced Geothermal Systems (EGS) on the United States in the 21st Century. Idaho Falls: Idaho National Laboratory;2006.
417. [417] Brielmann, H., Lueders, T., Schreglmann, K., Ferraro, F., Avramov, M., Hammerl, V., et al. Oberflächennahe Geothermie und ihre potenziellen Auswirkungen auf Grundwasserökosysteme. Grundwasser 16 (2011), 77–91, 10.1007/s00767-011-0166-9.
418. [418] Kagel, A., The State of Geothermal Technology Part II: Surface Technology. 2008, Geothermal Energy Association, Wahington DC.
419. [419] Tuyor, J.B., de Jesus, A.C., Medrano, R.S., Garcia, J.R.D., Salinio, S.M., Santos, L.S., Impact of geothermal well testing on exposed vegetation in the Northern Negros Geothermal Project, Philippines. Geothermics 34 (2005), 252–265, 10.1016/j.geothermics.2004.09.004.
420. [420] Arnorsson, S., Environmental impact of geothermal energy utilization. Ciere, R., Stille, P., (eds.) Energy, waste and the environment: a geochemical perspective, 2004, Geological Society, London.
421. [421] Roy, P.H., Ecotourism Potential of the Bacman Geothermal Production Field in Sorsogon City. Philippines. Proc World Geoth Cong. Bali, 2010.
422. [422] Eijgelaar, E., How eco is nature-based tourism? An analysis of German tourism to New Zealand's natural heritage and the impacts of nature-based activities. (MA Thesis) Eberswalde, 2006, University of Applied Sciences, Eberswalde.
423. [423] Gunnarsson, B., Gunnarsson, M.V., Watson, A.E., Alessa, L., Sproull, J., Iceland's Central Highlands: nature conservation, ecotourism, and energy resource utilization. In. Watson, A.E., Alessa, L., Sproull, J., (eds.) Wilderness circumpolar north Search, 2002, Anchorage: USDA Forest Services, 54–63.
424. [424] Gasparatos, A., Lee, L.Y., von Maltitz, G., Mathai, M.V., Puppim de Oliveira, J.A., Willis, K.J., Biofuels in Africa: Impacts on ecosystem services, biodiversity and human wellbeing. 2012, United Nations University, Yokohama.
425. [425] Campbell, M.S., Stehfest, K.M., Votier, S.C., Hall-Spencer, J.M., Mapping fisheries for marine spatial planning: Gear-specific vessel monitoring system (VMS), marine conservation and offshore renewable energy. Mar Policy 45 (2014), 293–300, 10.1016/j.marpol.2013.09.015.
426. [426] Laurance, W.F., Clements, G.R., Sloan, S., O'Connell, C.S., Mueller, N.D., Goosem, M., et al. A global strategy for road building. Nature 513 (2014), 229–232, 10.1038/nature13717.
427. [427] Laurance, W.F., Goosem, M., Laurance, S.G.W., Impacts of roads and linear clearings on tropical forests. Trends Ecol Evol 24 (2009), 659–669, 10.1016/j.tree.2009.06.009.
428. [428] Barber, C.P., Cochrane, M.A., Souza, C.M., Laurance, W.F., Roads, deforestation, and the mitigating effect of protected areas in the Amazon. Biol Conserv 177 (2014), 203–209, 10.1016/j.biocon.2014.07.004.
429. [429] Fearnside, P.M., de Alencastro Graça, P.M.L., BR-319: Brazil's Manaus-Porto Velho highway and the potential impact of linking the arc of deforestation to central amazonia. Environ Manag 38 (2006), 705–716, 10.1007/s00267-005-0295-y.
430. [430] Marcantonio, M., Rocchini, D., Geri, F., Bacaro, G., Amici, V., Biodiversity, roads, & landscape fragmentation: two Mediterranean cases. Appl Geogr 42 (2013), 63–72, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.05.001.
431. [431] Forys, E.A., Allen, C.R., Wojcik, D.P., Influence of the proximity and amount of human development and roads on the occurrence of the red imported fire ant in the lower Florida Keys. Biol Conserv 108 (2002), 27–33, 10.1016/S0006-3207(02)00086-1.
432. [432] Gelbard, J.L., Belnap, J., Roads as conduits for exotic plant invasions in a semiarid landscape. Conserv Biol 17 (2003), 420–432, 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2003.01408.x.
433. [433] Coffin, A.W., From roadkill to road ecology: A review of the ecological effects of roads. J Transp Geogr 15 (2007), 396–406, 10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2006.11.006.
434. [434] Davenport, J., Davenport, J.L., (eds.) The ecology of transportation: Managing mobility for the environment, 2006, Springer, Dordrecht.
435. [435] Benítez-López, A., Alkemade, R., Verweij, P.A., The impacts of roads and other infrastructure on mammal and bird populations: a meta-analysis. Biol Conserv 143 (2010), 1307–1316, 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.02.009.
436. [436] Fahrig, L., Rytwinski, T., Effects of roads on animal abundance: An empirical review and synthesis. Ecol Soc, 14, 2009, 21.
437. [437] Grilo, C., Bissonette, J.A., Santos-Reis, M., Spatial–temporal patterns in Mediterranean carnivore road casualties: consequences for mitigation. Biol Conserv 142 (2009), 301–313, 10.1016/j.biocon.2008.10.026.
438. [438] Johnson, W., Landscape effects on black-tailed prairie dog colonies. Biol Conserv 115 (2004), 487–497, 10.1016/S0006-3207(03)00165-4.
439. [439] Lee, M.A., Power, S.A., Direct and indirect effects of roads and road vehicles on the plant community composition of calcareous grasslands. Environ Pollut 176 (2013), 106–113, 10.1016/j.envpol.2013.01.018.
440. [440] Winiarski, K.J., Miller, D.L., Paton, P.W.C., McWilliams, S.R., A spatial conservation prioritization approach for protecting marine birds given proposed offshore wind energy development. Biol Conserv 169 (2014), 79–88, 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.004.
441. [441] Brabant, R., Vanermen, N., Stienen, E.W.M., Degraer, S., Towards a cumulative collision risk assessment of local and migrating birds in North Sea offshore wind farms. Hydrobiologia 756 (2015), 63–74, 10.1007/s10750-015-2224-2.
442. [442] Bradbury, G., Trinder, M., Furness, B., Banks, A.N., Caldow, R.W.G., Hume, D., Mapping Seabird Sensitivity to Offshore Wind Farms. PLoS One 9 (2014), 1–17, 10.1371/journal.pone.0106366.
443. [443] BSA. Minimum Requirements for Avifaunal Impact Assessment for) Wind Energy Facilities, Randburg: Birdlife South Africa; 2013.
444. [444] BSA. Guidelines to minimise the impact on birds of Solar Facilities and Associated Infrastructure in South Africa, Randburg: Birdlife South Africa; 2013.
445. [445] Best, B.S.A., Practice Guidelines for Avian Monitoring and Impact Mitigation. Randburg: Birdlife South Africa, 2013.
446. [446] Guarino, E., de, S.G., Barbosa, A.M., Waechter, J.L., Occurrence and abundance models of threatened plant species: Applications to mitigate the impact of hydroelectric power dams. Ecol Modell 230 (2012), 22–33, 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2012.01.007.
447. [447] Kim, C.-K., Toft, J.E., Papenfus, M., Verutes, G., Guerry, A.D., Ruckelshaus, M.H., et al. Catching the right wave: evaluating wave energy resources and potential compatibility with existing marine and coastal uses. PLoS One, 7, 2012, e47598, 10.1371/journal.pone.0047598.
448. [448] Rydell, J., Bach, L., Dubourg-Savage, M.-J., Green, M., Rodrigues, L., Hedenström, A., Bat mortality at wind turbines in Northwestern Europe. Acta Chiropterologica 12 (2010), 261–274, 10.3161/150811010X537846.
449. [449] Gao, Y., Skutsch, M., Drigo, R., Pacheco, P., Masera, O., Assessing deforestation from biofuels: methodological challenges. Appl Geogr 31 (2011), 508–518, 10.1016/j.apgeog.2010.10.007.
450. [450] Davis, S.C., House, J.I., Diaz-Chavez, R.A., Molnar, A., Valin, H., DeLucia, E.H., How can land-use modelling tools inform bioenergy policies?. Interface Focus 1 (2011), 212–223, 10.1098/rsfs.2010.0023.
451. [451] Rivas Casado, M., Mead, A., Burgess, P.J., Howard, D.C., Butler, S.J., Predicting the impacts of bioenergy production on farmland birds. Sci Total Environ 476-477 (2014), 7–19, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.12.080.
452. [452] Tessum, C.W., Marshall, J.D., Hill, J.D., A spatially and temporally explicit life cycle inventory of air pollutants from gasoline and ethanol in the United States. Environ Sci Technol 46 (2012), 11408–11417, 10.1021/es3010514.
453. [453] Sovacool, B.K., Contextualizing avian mortality: A preliminary appraisal of bird and bat fatalities from wind, fossil-fuel, and nuclear electricity. Energy Policy 37 (2009), 2241–2248, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.02.011.
454. [454] Willis, C.K.R., Barclay, R.M.R., Boyles, J.G., Mark Brigham, R., Brack, V., Waldien, D.L., et al. Bats are not birds and other problems with Sovacool's (2009) analysis of animal fatalities due to electricity generation. Energy Policy 38 (2010), 2067–2069, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.034.
455. [455] Sovacool, B.K., Megawatts are not megawatt-hours and other responses to Willis et al. Energy Policy 38 (2010), 2070–2073, 10.1016/j.enpol.2009.08.052.
456. [456] Wilbert, T.R., Woollett, D.A., Whitelaw, A., Dart, J., Hoyt, J.R., Galen, S., et al. Non-invasive baseline genetic monitoring of the endangered San Joaquin kit fox on a photovoltaic solar facility. Endanger Species Res 27 (2015), 31–41, 10.3354/esr00649.
457. [457] Ennen, J.R., Lovich, J.E., Meyer, K.P., Bjurlin, C., Arundel, T.R., Nesting Ecology of a Population of Gopherus agassizii at a Utility-Scale Wind Energy Facility in Southern California. Copeia 2 (2012), 222–228, 10.1643/CE-11-102.
458. [458] Inman, R., Esque, T., Nussear, K., Leitner, P., Matocq, M., Weisberg, P., et al. Is there room for all of us? Renewable energy and Xerospermophilus mohavensis. Endanger Species Res 20 (2013), 1–18, 10.3354/esr00487.
459. [459] Blasiak, R., Doll, C.N.H., Yagi, N., Kurokura, H., Displacement, diffusion and intensification (DDI) in marine fisheries: a typology for analyzing coalitional stability under dynamic conditions. Environ Sci Policy 54 (2015), 134–141.
460. [460] Dale, V.H., Parish, E.S., Kline, K.L., Risks to global biodiversity from fossil-fuel production exceed those from biofuel production. Biofuels, Bioprod Biorefining 9 (2015), 177–189, 10.1002/bbb.1528.
461. [461] Gasparatos, A., von Maltitz, G.P., Johnson, F.X., Lee, L., Mathai, M., Puppim de Oliveira, J.A., et al. Biofuels in sub-Sahara Africa: drivers, impacts and priority policy areas. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 45 (2015), 879–901, 10.1016/j.rser.2015.02.006.
462. [462] Allison, T.D., Root, T.L., Frumhoff, P.C., Thinking globally and siting locally: renewable energy and biodiversity in a rapidly warming world. Clim Change 126 (2014), 1–6, 10.1007/s10584-014-1127-y.
463. [463] Prip, C., Gross, T., Johnston, S., Vierros, M., Biodiversity Planning: an assessment of national biodiversity strategies and action plans. 2010, Yokohama: United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies, Yokohama.
464. [464] Petrokofsky, G., Kanowski, P., Brown, N.D., McDermott, C., Biodiversity and the forestry sector. Gasparatos, A., Willis, K.J., (eds.) Biodiversity in the Green, 2015, Routledge, Economy. London, 32–60.
465. [465] Bonilla-Moheno, M., Redo, D.J., Aide, T.M., Clark, M.L., Grau, H.R., Vegetation change and land tenure in Mexico: a country-wide analysis. Land Use Policy 30 (2013), 355–364, 10.1016/j.landusepol.2012.04.002.
466. [466] Puppim de Oliveira, J.A., Property rights, land conflicts and deforestation in the Eastern Amazon. For Policy Econ 10 (2008), 303–315, 10.1016/j.forpol.2007.11.008.
467. [467] Truax, B., Gagnon, D., Lambert, F., Fortier, J., Multiple-use zoning model for private forest owners in agricultural landscapes: a case study. Forests 6 (2015), 3614–3664.
468. [468] Phalan, B., Onial, M., Balmford, A., Green, R.E., Reconciling food production and biodiversity conservation: land sharing and land sparing compared. Science 333 (2011), 1289–1291, 10.1126/science.1208742.
469. [469] Duvail, S., Médard, C., Hamerlynck, O., Nyingi, D.W., Land and water grabbing in an East African coastal wetland: the case of the Tana delta. Water Alternatives 5 (2012), 322–343.
470. [470] Kuchler, M., Linnér, B.O., Challenging the food vs. fuel dilemma: Genealogical analysis of the biofuel discourse pursued by international organizations. Food Policy 37 (2012), 581–588, 10.1016/j.foodpol.2012.06.005.
471. [471] Kang, S., Post, W.M., Nichols, J.A., Wang, D., West, T.O., Bandaru, V., Izaurralde, R.C., Marginal lands: concept, assessment and management. J Agr Sci 5 (2013), 129–139.
472. [472] Shortall, O.K., “Marginal land” for energy crops: exploring definitions and embedded assumptions. Energy Policy 62 (2013), 19–27, 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.07.048.
473. [473] Milbrandt, A.R., Heimiller, D.M., Perry, A.D., Field, C.B., Renewable energy potential on marginal lands in the United States. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 29 (2014), 473–481, 10.1016/j.rser.2013.08.079.
474. [474] Baka, J., Bailis, R., Wasteland energy-scapes: a comparative energy flow analysis of India's biofuel and biomass economies. Ecol Econ 108 (2014), 8–17, 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2014.09.022.
475. [475] Fu, B., Wang, Y.K., Xu, P., Yan, K., Li, M., Value of ecosystem hydropower service and its impact on the payment for ecosystem services. Sci Total Environ 472 (2014), 338–346, 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.11.015.
476. [476] Bennett, D.E., Gosnell, H., Lurie, S., Duncan, S., Utility engagement with payments for watershed services in the United States. Ecosyst Serv 8 (2014), 56–64, 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.02.001.
477. [477] Guo, Z., Li, Y., Xiao, X., Zhang, L., Gan, Y., Hydroelectricity production and forest conservation in watersheds. Ecol Appl 17 (2007), 1557–1562.
478. [478] Meyer, M.A., Priess, J.A., Indicators of bioenergy-related certification schemes – an analysis of the quality and comprehensiveness for assessing local/regional environmental impacts. Biomass Bioenergy 65 (2014), 151–169, 10.1016/j.biombioe.2014.03.041.
479. [479] Davis, J., Kidd, I.M., Identifying major stressors: the essential precursor to restoring cultural ecosystem services in a degraded Estuary. Estuar Coast 35 (2012), 1007–1017, 10.1007/s12237-012-9498-7.
480. [480] Jackson, A.L.R., Renewable energy vs. biodiversity: policy conflicts and the future of nature conservation. Glob Environ Chang 21 (2011), 1195–1208, 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.07.001.
481. [481] IRENA, Tidal Energy: Technology Brief. 2014, Masdar City:International Renewable Energy Agency, IRENA).
482. [482] Ernst, Young, G.M., Rising tide: Global trends in the emerging ocean energy market. 2013, Ernst and Young, London.
483. [483] Noh C-H, Kim I, Jang W-H, Kim C-H. Recent trends in renewable energy resources for power generation in the republic of Korea. Resources 2015:4;751-764.
484. [484] (Frankfurt School-UNEP Centre/BNEF. Global trends in renewable energy investment 2015. Frankfurt: Frankfurt School-UNEP Centre; 2015.
485. [485] Aquamarine. Aquamarine power announces plans to downsize business. Edinburg: Aquamarine; 2014 Available at: 〈〉 [accessed 11.12.15].
486. [486] Magagna, D., Uihlein, A., Ocean energy development in Europe: current status and future perspective. Int J Mar Energy, 2015, 1184–1198.
487. [487] Thaxter, C.B., Ross-Smith, V.H., Bouten, W., Clark, N.A., Conway, G.J., Rehfisch, M.M., et al. Seabird–wind farm interactions during the breeding season vary within and between years: a case study of lesser black-backed gull Larus fuscus in the UK. Biol Conserv 186 (2015), 347–358, 10.1016/j.biocon.2015.03.027.
488. [488] Vega, L.A., Ocean Thermal Energy Conversion. In: Meyer RA, Encyclopedia of sustainability science and technology. 2012, Springer, Berlin, 7296–7328.
489. [489] CRRC, Ocean thermal energy conversion: assessing potential physical, chemical and biological impacts and risks. 2010, Durham: Coastal Response Research Center.
490. [490] Zhou, A., Thomson, E., The development of biofuels in Asia. Appl Energy 86 (2009), S11–S20.
491. [491] Bowyer, C., Tucker, G., Nesbit, M., Baldock, D., Illes, A., Paquel, C., Delivering synergies between renewable energy and nature conservation: messages for policy making up to 2030 and beyond. 2015, Institute for European Environmental Policy (IEEP), London.
492. [492] SCBD, Interlinkages between biological diversity and) climate change: Advice on the integration of biodiversity considerations into the implementation of the United Nation Framework Convention on Climate Change and its Kyoto protocol, 2003, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity (SCBD), Montreal.
493. [493] Fletcher, R.J., Robertson, B.A., Evans, J., Doran, P.J., Alavalapati, J.R.R., Schemske, D.W., Biodiversity conservation in the era of biofuels: risks and opportunities. Front Ecol Environ 9 (2011), 161–168, 10.1890/090091.
494. [494] Thompson, D., Hall, A.J., Lonergan, M., McConnell, B., Northridge. Current status of knowledge of effects of offshore renewable energy generation devices on marine mammals and research requirements. 2013, Scottish Government, Edinburgh.
495. [495] Bailey, H., Senior, B., Simmons, D., Rusin, J., Picken, G., Thompson, P.M., Assessing underwater noise levels during pile-driving at an offshore windfarm and its potential effects on marine mammals. Mar Pollut Bull 60 (2010), 888–897, 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2010.01.003.
496. [496] Tougaard, J., Henriksen, O.D., Miller, L.A., Underwater noise from three types of offshore wind turbines: estimation of impact zones for harbor porpoises and harbor seals. J Acoust Soc Am 125 (2009), 3766–3773, 10.1121/1.3117444.
497. [497] Bailey, H., Brookes, K.L., Thompson, P.M., Assessing environmental impacts of offshore wind farms: lessons learned and recommendations for the future. Aquat Biosystem, 10, 2014, 8, 10.1186/2046-9063-10-8.
498. [498] Miyake, S., Smith, C., Peterson, A., McAlpine, C., Renouf, M., Waters, D., Environmental implications of using ‘underutilised agricultural land’ for future bioenergy crop production. Agric Syst 139 (2015), 180–195.
499. [499] Hayes, M.A., Bats killed in large numbers at United States wind energy facilities. BioScience 63 (2013), 975–979.
500. [500] Arnett, E.B., Huso, M.M.P., Schirmacher, M.R., Hayes, J.P., Altering turbine speed reduces bat mortality at wind-energy facilities. Front Ecol Environ 9 (2011), 209–214.
501. [501] Vijayaraghavan, K., Green roofs: a critical review on the role of components, benefits, limitations and trends. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 57 (2016), 740–752.
502. [502] Nash, C., Clough, J., Gedge, D., Lindsay, R., Newport, D., Ciupala, M.A., Connon, S., Initial insights on the biodiversity potential of biosolar roofs: a London Olympic Park green roof case study. Isr J Ecol Evol, 2015, 10.1080/15659801.2015.1045791.
503. [503] Worldwatch Institute, Biofuels for transport: global potential and implications for sustainable energy and agriculture. 2007, Earthscan, London.
504. [504] Jones, D.L., Potential air emission impacts of cellulosic ethanol production at seven demonstration refineries in the United States. J Air Waste Manage Assoc 60:9 (2010), 1118–1143.