A spatial conservation prioritization approach for protecting marine birds given proposed offshore wind energy development

Biological Conservation

Volumn 169, Issue , 2014, Pages 79-88

  Winiarski, Kristopher J ^a   Miller, David L ^a   Paton, Peter W C ^a   McWilliams, Scott R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF RHODE ISLAND   (United States)

Author keywords

Density surface modeling; Ecosystem based marine spatial planning; Marine birds; Offshore wind development; Spatial conservation prioritization; Species distribution modeling; Zonation

Indexed keywords

AERIAL SURVEY; CATALYST; CONSERVATION PLANNING; DECISION MAKING; OFFSHORE STRUCTURE; PRIORITIZATION; SEABIRD; SOFTWARE; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION; SPATIAL PLANNING; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS; WIND POWER; ZONATION;

ATLANTIC COAST [NORTH AMERICA]; RHODE ISLAND; UNITED STATES;

AVES;

EID: 84888361786     PISSN: 00063207     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biocon.2013.11.004     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Ainley D.G., Dugger K.D., Ford R.G., Pierce S.D., Reese D.C., Brodeur R.D., Tynan C.T., Barth J.A. Association of predators and prey at frontal features in the California current: competition, facilitation, and co-occurrence. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2009, 389:271-294.
2. Arponen A., Lehtomäki J., Leppanen J., Tomppo E., Moilanen A. Effects of connectivity and spatial resolution of analyses on conservation prioritization across large extents. Conserv. Biol. 2012, 26:294-304.
3. Ballard G., Jongsomjit D., Veloz S.D., Ainley D.G. Coexistence of mesopredators in an intact polar ocean ecosystem: the basis for defining a Ross Sea marine protected area. Biol. Conserv. 2012, 156:72-82.
4. Bekessy S.A., White M., Gordon A., Moilanen A., McCarthy M.A., Wintle B.A. Transparent planning for biodiversity and development in the urban fringe. Landscape Urban Plan. 2012, 108:140-149.
5. Bright J., Langston R., Bullman R., Evans R., Gardner S., Pearce-Higgins J. Map of bird sensitivities to wind projects in Scotland: a tool to aid planning and conservation. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141:2342-2356.
6. Buckland S.T., Anderson D.R., Burnham K.P., Laake J.L., Borchers D.L., Thomas L. Introduction to Distance Sampling: Estimating Abundance of Biological Populations 2001, Oxford University Press, London.
7. Buckland S.T., Anderson D.R., Burnham K.P., Laake J.L., Borchers D.L., Thomas L. Advanced Distance Sampling 2004, Oxford University Press, London.
8. Buckland S.T., Burt M.L., Rexstad E.A., Mellor M., Williams A.E., Woodward R. Aerial surveys of seabirds: the advent of digital methods. J. Appl. Ecol. 2012, 49:960-967.
9. Camphuysen, C.J., Fox, A.D., Leopold, M., Petersen, I.K., 2004. Towards standardized seabirds at sea census techniques in connection with environmental impact assessments for offshore wind farms. In: UK COWRIE 1 Report. Royal Netherlands Institute for Sea Research, Texel, Netherlands.
10. Certain G., Bellier E., Planque B., Bretagnolle V. Characterising the temporal variability of the spatial distribution of animals: an application to seabirds at sea. Ecography 2007, 30:695-708.
11. Clarke E.D., Spear L.B., Mccracken M.L., Marques F.F.C., Borchers D.L., Buckland S.T., Ainley D.G. Validating the use of generalized additive models and at-sea surveys to estimate size and temporal trends of seabird populations. J. Appl. Ecol. 2003, 40:278-292.
12. Codiga, D.L., Ullman, D.S., 2010. Characterizing the physical oceanography of coastal waters off Rhode Island, Part 1: literature review, available observations, and a representative model simulation. Appendix to Rhode Island Ocean Special Area Management Plan, Narragansett, Rhode Island.
13. Delavenne J., Metcalfe K., Smith R.J., Vaz S., Martin C.S., Dupuis L., Coppin F., Carpentier A. Systematic conservation planning in the eastern English Channel: comparing the Marxan and Zonation decision-support tools. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2012, 69:75-83.
14. Desholm M., Kahlert J. Avian collision risk at an offshore wind farm. Biol. Lett. 2005, 1:296-298.
15. European Wind Energy Association (EWEA), 2013. Wind In Power 2012. (accessed 29.07.13). http://www.ewea.org/.
16. Foley M.M., Halpern B.S., Micheli F., Armsby M.H., Caldwell M.R., Crain C.M., Prahler E., Rohr N., Sivas D., Beck M.W., Carr M.H., Crowder L.B., Emmett Duffy J., Hacker S.D., Mcleod K.L., Palumbi S.R., Peterson C.H., Regan H.M., Ruckelshaus M.H., Sandifer P.A., Steneck R.S. Guiding ecological principles for marine spatial planning. Mar. Pol. 2010, 34:955-966.
17. Furness R.W., Wade H.M., Masden E.A. Assessing vulnerability of marine bird populations to offshore wind farms. J. Environ. Manage. 2013, 119:56-66.
18. Guisan A., Thuller W. Predicting species distribution: offering more than simple habitat models. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:993-1009.
19. Hedley S.L., Buckland S.T. Spatial models for line transect sampling. J. Agric. Biol. Environ. Stat. 2004, 9:181-199.
20. Kinlan, B.P., Menza, C., Huettmann, F., 2012. Predictive modeling of seabird distribution patterns in the New York Bight. In: Menza, C., Kinlan, B.P., Dorfman, D.S., Poti, M, Caldow, C. (Eds.), A Biogeographic Assessment of Seabirds, Deep Sea Corals and Ocean Habitats of the New York Bight: Science to Support Offshore Spatial Planning. NOAA Technical Memorandum NOS NCCOS 141. Silver Spring, Maryland (Chapter 6).
21. Kremen C., Cameron A., Moilanen A., Phillips S.J., Thomas C.D., Beentje H., Dransfield J., Fisher B.L., Glaw F., Good T.C., Harper G.J., Hijmans R.J., Lees D.C., Louis E., Nussbaum R.A., Raxworthy C.J., Razafimpahanana A., Schatz G.E., Vences M., Vieites D.R., Wright P.C., Zjhra M.L. Aligning conservation priorities across taxa in Madagascar with high-resolution planning tools. Science 2008, 320:222-226.
22. Kukkala A.S., Moilanen A. Core concepts of spatial prioritisation in systematic conservation planning. Biol. Rev. 2013, 88:443-464.
23. Lafrance, M., Shumchenia, E., King, J., Pockalny, R., Oakley, B., Pratt, S., Boothroyd, J., 2010. Benthic habitat distribution and subsurface geology selected sites from the Rhode Island Ocean Special Area Management Plan study area. Rhode Island Ocean Special Area Management Plan, Narragansett, Rhode Island.
24. Langston R.H.W. Birds and wind projects across the pond: a UK perspective. Wildlife Soc. Bull. 2013, 37:5-18.
25. Larsen J.K., Guillemette M. Effects of wind turbines on flight behavior of wintering common eiders: implications for habitat use and collision risk. J. Appl. Ecol. 2007, 44:516-522.
26. Le Corre M., Jaquemet S. Assessment of the seabird community of the Mozambique Channel and its potential use as indicator of tuna abundance. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2005, 63:421-428.
27. Leathwick J., Moilanen A., Francis M., Elith J., Taylor P., Julian K., Hastie T., Duffy C. Novel methods for the design and evaluation of marine protected areas in offshore waters. Conserv. Lett. 2008, 1:91-102.
28. Leathwick J.R., Moilanen A., Ferrier S., Julian K. Complementarity-based conservation prioritization using a community classification: and its application to riverine ecosystems. Biol. Conserv. 2010, 143:984-991.
29. Lehtomäki J., Moilanen A. Methods and workflow for spatial conservation prioritization using Zonation. Environ. Model Softw. 2013, 47:128-137.
30. Lehtomäki J., Tomppo E., Kuokkanen P., Hanski I., Moilanen A. Applying spatial conservation prioritization software and high-resolution GIS data to a national-scale study in forest conservation. Forest Ecol. Manage. 2009, 258:2439-2449.
31. Leonhard, S.B., Pedersen, J., Grøn, P.N., Skov, H., Jansen, J., Topping, C., Petersen, I.K., 2013. Wind farms affect common scoter and red-throated diver behaviour. In Danish Offshore Wind: Key Environmental Issues - A Follow-up. The Environment Group: The Danish Energy Agency, The Danish Nature Agency, DONG Energy and Vattenfall, pp. 70-93 (Chapter 5).
32. Litzow M.A., Piatt J.F., Abookire A.A., Prichard A.K., Robards M.D. Monitoring temporal and spatial variability in sandeel (Ammodytes hexapterus) abundance with pigeon guillemot (Cepphus columba) diets. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2000, 57:976-986.
33. Loring, P.H., Paton, P.W.C., Osenkowski, J., Gilliland, S.G., Savard, J.P.L., McWilliams, S.R. Habitat use of black scoters in southern New England and siting of offshore wind energy facilities. J. Wild Manage. (in press).
34. Maclean I.M.D., Rehfisch M.M., Skov H., Thaxter C.B. Evaluating the statistical power of detecting changes in the abundance of seabirds at sea. IBIS 2013, 155:113-126.
35. Masden E.A., Haydon D.T., Fox A.D., Furness R.W., Bullman R., Desholm M. Barriers to movement: impacts of wind farms on migrating birds. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2009, 66:746-753.
36. Masden E.A., Reeve R., Desholm M., Fox A.D., Furness R.W., Haydon D.T. Assessing the impact of marine wind farms on birds through movement modeling. J. Royal Soc. Int. 2012, 9:2120-2130.
37. Massachusetts Final Ocean Plan, 2009. http://www.mass.gov/eea/ocean-coastal-management/mass-ocean-plan/final-massachusetts-ocean-management-plan.html.
38. Mau J.C., Wang D.P., Ullman D.S., Codiga D.L. Comparison of observed (HF radar, ADCP) and model barotropic tidal currents in the New York Bight and Block Island Sound. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci. 2007, 72:129-137.
39. Miller, D.L., 2012. Distance: a simple way to fit detection functions to distance sampling data and calculate abundance/density for biological populations. R package version 0.7.1. http://www.CRAN.R-project.org/package=Distance.
40. Miller, D.L., 2013. DSM: Density surface modelling of distance sampling data. R package version 2.0.1. http://www.CRAN.R-project.org/package=dsm.
41. Miller D.L., Burt M.L., Rexstad E.A., Thomas L. Spatial models for distance sampling data: recent developments and future directions. Method Ecol. Evol. 2013, 10.1111/2041-210X.12105.
42. Moilanen A. Landscape Zonation, benefit functions and target-based planning: unifying reserve selection strategies. Biol. Conserv. 2007, 134:571-579.
43. Moilanen A. Planning impact avoidance and biodiversity offsetting using software for spatial conservation prioritization. Wildlife Res. 2012, 40:153-162.
44. Moilanen A., Franco A.M.A., Early R.I., Fox R., Wintle B., Thomas C.D. Prioritizing multiple-use landscapes for conservation: methods for large multi-species planning problems. Proc. R. Soc. 2005, 272:1885-1891.
45. NOAA. 2013a. Geophysical Data Center Coastal Relief Model. (accessed 29.07.13). http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/coastal/crm.html.
46. NOAA. 2013b. Geophysical Data Center Seafloor Sediment Grain Size Database. (accessed 29.07.13). http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/geology/size.html.
47. NOAA. 2013c. Environmental Research Division's Data Access Program. (accessed 29.07.13). http://www.coastwatch.pfeg.noaa.gov/erddap/index.html.
48. Nur N., Jahncke J., Herzog M.P., Howar J., Hyrenbach K.D., Zamon J.E., Ainley D.G., Wiens J.A., Morgan K.E., Balance L.T., Stralberg D. Where the wild things are: predicting hotspots of seabird aggregations in the California Current System. Ecol. Appl. 2011, 21:2241-2257.
49. Oppel S., Meirinho A., Ramírez I., Gardner B., O'Connell A.F., Miller P.I., Louzao M. Comparison of five modelling techniques to predict the spatial distribution and abundance of seabirds. Biol. Conserv. 2012, 156:94-104.
50. Pérez Lapenã B., Wijnberg K.M., Hulscher S.J.M.H., Stein A. Environmental impact assessment of offshore wind farms: a simulation-based approach. J. Appl. Ecol. 2010, 47:1110-1118.
51. Pérez Lapenã B., Wijnberg K.M., Stein A., Hulscher S.J.M.H. Spatial factors affecting statistical power in testing marine fauna displacement. Ecol. Appl. 2011, 21:2756-2769.
52. Pérez Lapenã B., Wijnberg K.M., Stein A., Hulscher S.J.M.H. Spatial variogram estimated from temporally aggregated seabird count data. Environ. Ecol. Stat. 2012, 20:353-375.
53. Petersen, I.K., Christensen, T.K., Kahlert, J., Desholm, M., Fox, A.D., 2006. Final results of bird studies at the offshore wind farms at Nysted and Horns Rev, Denmark. In: National Research Institute Report, Ronde, Denmark.
54. Petersen, I.K., MacKenzie, M.L., Rexstad, E., Wisz, M.S., Fox, A.D., 2011. Comparing pre- and post-construction distributions of long-tailed ducks Clangula hyemalis in and around the Nysted offshore wind farm, Denmark: a quasi-designed experiment accounting for imperfect detection, local surface features and autocorrelation. In: CREEM Technical Report 2011-1.
55. Polasky S., Nelson E., Camm J., Csuti B., Fackler P., Lonsdorf E., Montgomery C., White D., Arthur J., Garber-Yonts B., Haight R., Kagan J., Starfield A., Tobalske C. Where to put things? Spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns. Biol. Conserv. 2008, 141:1505-1524.
56. R Development Core Team R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing 2012, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, ISBN: 3-900051-07-0, URL:
57. Rhode Island Ocean Special Area Management Plan, 2010. (accessed 29.07.13). http://www.seagrant.gso.uri.edu/oceansamp/.
58. Schwemmer P., Mendel B., Sonntag N., Dierschke V., Garthe S. Effects of ship traffic on seabirds in offshore waters: implications for marine conservation and spatial planning. Ecol. Appl. 2011, 21:1851-1860.
59. Seber G.A.F. The Estimation of Animal Abundance and Related Parameters 1982, Edward Arnold, London. second ed.
60. Street M.W., Deaton A.S., Chappell W.S., Mooreside P.D. North Carolina Coastal Habitat Protection Plan. North Carolina Department of Environment and Natural Resources 2005, Division of Marine Fisheries, Morehead City, North Carolina.
61. Thomas L., Buckland S.T., Rexstad E., Laake J.L., Strindberg S., Hedley S.L., Bishop J.R.B., Marques T.A., Burnham K.P. Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size. J. Appl. Ecol. 2010, 47:5-14.
62. Tremblay Y., Bertrand S., Henry R.W., Kappes M.A., Costa D.P., Shaffer S.A. Analytical approaches to investigating seabird-environment interactions: a review. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2009, 391:153-163.
63. US Department of Energy, 2011. Offshore Energy Workshop. A Joint Workshop by the Energy Department's office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy and the Department of the Interior's Bureau of Ocean Energy Management, Washington, DC.
64. Vanermen, N., Stienen, E.W.M., Onkelinx, T., Courtens, W., Van de walle, M., Verschelde, P., Verstraete, H., 2012. Seabirds and Offshore Wind Farms Monitoring Results 2011. Research Institute for Nature and Forest, Brussels. INBO.R.2012.25.
65. Wakefield E.D., Phillips R.A., Matthiopoulos J. Quantifying habitat use and preferences of pelagic seabirds using individual movement data: a review. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2009, 391:165-182.
66. Winiarski, K.J., Burt, M.L., Rexstad, E., Miller, D.L., Trocki, C.L., Paton, P.W.C., McWilliams, S.R. Integrating aerial and ship surveys of marine birds into a combined density surface model: a case study of wintering common loons. Condor (in press).
67. Williams R., Hedley S.L., Branch T.A., Bravington M.V., Zerbini A.N., Findlay K.P. Chilean blue whales as a case study to illustrate methods to estimate abundance and evaluate conservation status of rare species. Conserv. Biol. 2011, 25:526-535.
68. Winiarski, K.J., Paton, P.W.C, McWilliams, S.R., Miller, D.L., 2012. Studies investigating the spatial distribution and abundance of marine birds in nearshore and offshore waters of Rhode Island. Rhode Island Ocean Special Area Management Plan, Narragansett, Rhode Island.
69. Winiarski K.J., Miller D.L., Paton P.W.C., McWilliams S.R. Environmental factors determining the distribution and abundance of a diving marine birds: conservation implications for the common loon Gavia immer. Mar. Ecol. Prog. Ser. 2013, 492:273-283. 10.3354/meps10492.
70. Wood S.N. Thin plate regression splines. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 2003, 65:95-114.
71. Wood S.N. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction With R 2006, Chapman and Hall-CRC, Boca Raton, Florida.
72. Wood S.N. Fast stable restricted maximum likelihood and marginal likelihood estimation of semiparametric generalized linear models. J. Roy. Stat. Soc. Ser. B 2011, 73:3-36.