Linkages between biodiversity attributes and ecosystem services: A systematic review

Ecosystem Services

Volumn 9, Issue , 2014, Pages 191-203

  Harrison, P A ^a   Berry, P M ^a   Simpson, G ^a   Haslett, J R ^b   Blicharska, M ^c   Bucur, M ^d   Dunford, R ^a   Egoh, B ^e   Garcia Llorente, M ^a,f,g   Geamana N ^d   Geertsema, W ^h   Lommelen, E ⁱ   Meiresonne, L ⁱ   Turkelboom, F ⁱ  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

^c SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^d UNIVERSITY OF BUCHAREST   (Romania)

^e JOINT RESEARCH CENTRE   (Italy)

^f UNIVERSIDAD CARLOS III DE MADRID   (Spain)

^g UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

^h WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

ⁱ RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR NATURE AND FOREST INBO   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Attribute; Biodiversity; Ecosystem function; Ecosystem service; Network analysis; Trait

Indexed keywords

EID: 84908360245     PISSN: 22120416     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoser.2014.05.006     Document Type: Article

References (90)

1. Allsopp M.H., de Lange W.J., Veldtman R. Valuing insect pollination services with cost of replacement. PLOS One 2008, 3(9):e3128.
2. Balvanera P., Siddique I., Dee L., Paquette A., Isbell F., González A., Byrnes J., O'Connor M.I., Hungate B.A., Griffin J.N. Linking biodiversity and ecosystem services: current uncertainties and the necessary next steps. BioScience 2014, 64:49-57.
3. Balvanera P., Pfisterer A.B., Buchmann N., He J.S., Nakashizuka T., Raffaelli D., Schmid B. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol. Lett. 2006, 9:1146-1156.
4. Balvanera P., Kremen C., Martinez M. Applying community structure analysis to ecosystem function: examples from pollination and carbon storage. Ecol. Appl. 2005, 15:360-375.
5. Bastian O. The role of biodiversity in supporting ecosystem services in Natura 2000 sites. Ecol. Indic. 2013, 24:13-22.
6. Bianchi F.J.J.A., Schellhorn N.A., Buckley Y.M., Possingham H.P. Spatial variability in ecosystem services: simple rules for predator-mediated pest suppression. Ecol. Appl. 2010, 20:2322-2333.
7. Biesmeijer J.C., Roberts S.P.M., Reemer M., Ohlemueller R., Edwards M., Peeters T., Schaffers A.P., Potts S.G., Kleukers R., Thomas C.D., Settele J., Kunin W.E. Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and The Netherlands. Science 2006, 313(5785):351-354.
8. Bren L., Hopmans P. Paired catchments observations on the water yield of mature eucalypt and immature radiata pine plantations in Victoria, Australia. J. Hydrol. 2007, 336:416-429.
9. Bullock J., Aronson J., Newton A., Pywell R., Rey-Benayas J. Restoration of ecosystem services and biodiversity: conflicts and opportunities. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2011, 26(10):541-549. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.06.011.
10. Butler C.D., Oluoch-Kosura W. Linking future ecosystem services and future human well-being. Ecol. Soc. 2006, 11(1):30.
11. Buytaert W., Iniguez V., De Bievre B. The effects of afforestation and cultivation on water yield in the Andean paramo. Forest Ecol. Manag. 2007, 251(1-2):22-30.
12. Cammeraat E., van Beek R., Kooijman A. Vegetation succession and its consequences for slope stability in SE Spain. Plant Soil 2005, 278(1-2)., 10.1007/s11104-005-5893-1.
13. Cardinale B.J., Duffy J.E., Gonzalez A., Hooper D.U., Perrings C., Venail P., Narwani A., Mace G.M., Tilman D.A., Wardle D., Kinzig A.P., Daily G.C., Loreau M., Grace J.B., Larigauderie A., Srivastava D.S., Naeem S. Biodiversity loss and its impact on humanity. Nature 2012, 486:59-67.
14. Cardinale B.J., Srivastava D.S., Duffy J.E., Wright J.P., Dowing A.L., Sankaran M., Jouseau C. Effects of biodiversity on the functioning of trophic groups and ecosystems. Nature 2006, 443:989-992.
15. Carpenter S.R., Mooney H.A., Agard J., Capistrano D., DeFries R.S., Diaz S., Dietz T., Duraiappah A.K., Oteng-Yeboah A., Miguel Pereira H., Perrings C., Reid W.V., Sarukhan J., Scholes R.J., Whyte A. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the millennium ecosystem assessment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2009, 106:1305-1312.
16. Chan K.M.A., Shaw M.R., Cameron D.R., Underwood E.C., Daily G.C. Conservation planning for ecosystem services. PLOS Biol. 2006, 4:2138-2152.
17. Conti G., Díaz S. Plant functional diversity and carbon storage - an empirical test in semi-arid forest ecosystems. J. Ecol. 2013, 101:18-28.
18. Costanza R., d'Arge R., de Groot R., Farber S., Grasso M., Hannon B., Limburg K., Naeem S., O'Neill R.V., Paruelo J., Raskin R.G., Sutton P., van den Belt M. The value of the world[U+05F3]s ecosystem services and natural capital. Nature 1997, 387:253-260.
19. Nature[U+05F3]s Services: Societal Dependence on Natural Ecosystems 1997, Island Press, Washington DC. G.C. Daily (Ed.).
20. de Bello F., Lavorel S., Diaz S., Harrington R., Cornelissen J., Bargett R., Berg M., Cipriotti P., Feld C.K., Hering D., Martins da Silva P., Potts S., Sandin L., Sousa J.P., Storkey J., Wardle D., Harrison P.A. Towards an assessment of multiple ecosystem processes and services via functional traits. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19:2873-2893., 10.1007/s10531-010-9850-9.
21. de Groot R.S., Wilson M.A., Boumans R.M.J. A typology for the classification, description and valuation of ecosystem functions, goods and services. Ecol. Econ. 2002, 41:393-408.
22. de Groot R.S., Alkemade J.R.M., Braat L., Hein L.G., Willemen L.L.J.M. Challenges in integrating the concept of ecosystem services and values in landscape planning, management and decision-making. Ecol. Complex. 2010, 7:260-272.
23. De Silva S.S., Lin Y., Tang G. Possible yield-predictive models based on morphometric characteristics and stocking rates for three groups of Chinese reservoirs. Fish. Res. 1992, 13:369-380.
24. Díaz S., Lavorel S., de Bello F., Quétier F., Grigulis K., Robson T.M. Incorporating plant functional diversity effects in ecosystem service assessments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 2007, 104:20684-20689.
25. Díaz S., Fargione J., Chapin F.S., Tilman D. Biodiversity loss threatens human well-being. PLOS Biol. 2006, 4(8):e277., 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040277.
26. Diaz S., Cabido M. Vive la difference: plant functional diversity matters to ecosystem processes. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2001, 16:646-655.
27. Drapela T., Frank T., Heer X., Moser D., Zaller J.G. Landscape structure affects activity density, body size and fecundity of Pardosa wolf sipiders (Araneae: Lycosidae) in winter oilseed rape. Eur. J. Entomol. 2011, 106:609-614.
28. Erskine W.D., Webb A.A. Desnagging to resnagging: new directions in river rehabilitation in southeastern Australia. River Res. Appl. 2003, 19:233-249.
29. Erskine P., Lamb D., Bristow M. Tree species diversity and ecosystem function: can tropical multi-species plantations generate greater productivity?. For. Ecol. Manag. 2006, 233:205-210.
30. Fagan K.C., Pywell R.F., Bullock J.M., Marrs R.H. Do restored calcareous grasslands on former arable fields resemble ancient targets? The effect of time, methods and environment on outcomes. J. Appl. Ecol. 2008, 45:1293-1303., 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2008.01492.x.
31. Farley K.A., Jobbagy E.G., Jackson R.B. Effects of afforestation on water yield: a global synthesis with implications for policy. Global Change Biol. 2005, 11:1565-1576.
32. Feerst A., Aldred T.D., Jedamzik K. Biodiversity quality: a paradigm for biodiversity. Ecol. Indic. 2010, 10:1077-1082.
33. Feerst A. Establishing baseline indices for the quality of the biodiversity of restored habitats using a standardised sampling process. Restor. Ecol. 2006, 14:112-122.
34. Fisher B., Turner R.K., Morling P. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision-making. Ecol. Econ. 2009, 68:643-653.
35. Foote A.L., Pandey S., Krogman N.T. Processes of wetland loss in India. Environ. Conserv. 1996, 23(1):45-54.
36. García-Mora, M.R., Montes, C., 2011. AN+20. El desafío de la gestión de los espacios naturales de Andalucía en el siglo XXI, Consejería de Medio Ambiente, Junta de Andalucía, España.
37. Gaston K.J. Global patterns in biodiversity. Nature 2000, 405:220-227.
38. Haines-Young, R., Potschin, M., 2013. Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES), Consultation on Version 4, August-December 2012. Report to the European Environmental Agency, EEA Framework Contract no: EEA/IEA/09/003.
39. Hantanaka N., Wright W., Loyn R.H., Mac Nally R. Ecologically complex carbon - linking biodiversity values, carbon storage and habitat structure in some austral temperate forests. Global Ecol. Biogeogr. 2011, 20:260-271.
40. Harrington R., Anton C., Dawson T.P., de Bello F., Feld C.K., Haslett J.R., Kluvánkova-Oravská T., Kontogianni A., Lavorel S., Luck G.W., Rounsevell M.D.A., Samways M.J., Settele J., Skourtos M., Spangenberg J.H., Vandewalle M., Zobel M., Harrison P.A. Ecosystem services and biodiversity conservation: a glossary. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19(10):2773-2790., 10.1007/s10531-010-9834-9.
41. Harrison P.A., Vandewalle M., Sykes M.T., Berry P.M., Bugter R., de Bello F., Feld C.K., Grandin U., Harrington R., Haslett J.R., Jongman R.H.G., Luck G.W., Martins da Silva P., Moora M., Settele J., Sousa J.P., Zobel M. Identifying and prioritising services in European terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19:2791-2821., 10.1007/s10531-010-9789-x.
42. Hasan M.R., Middendorp H.A.J. Optimising stocking density of carp fingerlings through modelling of the carp yield in relation to average water transparency in enhanced fisheries in semi-closed water bodies in western Bangladesh. Inland Fishery Enhancements. FAO Fish Technical 1998, 159-160. FAO, Rome, (Paper 374). T. Petr (Ed.).
43. Haslett J.R., Berry P.A., Bela G., Jongman R.H.G., Pataki G., Samways M.J., Zobel M. Changing conservation strategies in Europe: a framework integrating ecosystem services and dynamics. Biodivers. Conserv. 2010, 19:2963-2977.
44. Hermoso V., Clavero M., Blanco-Garrido F., Prenda J. Invasive species and habitat degradation in Iberian streams: an analysis of their role in freshwater fish diversity loss. Ecol. Appl. 2011, 21(1):175-188.
45. Hoehn P., Tscharntke T., Tylianakis J.M., Steffan-Dewenter I. Functional group diversity of bee pollinators increases crop yield. Proc. Royal Soc. B-Biol. Sci. 2008, 275(1648):2283-2291.
46. Hooper D.U., Chapin F.S., Ewel J.J., Hector A., Inchausti P., Lavorel S., Lawton J.H., Lodge D.M., Loreau M., Naeem S., Schmid B., Setälä H., Symstad A.J., Vandermeer J., Wardle D.A. Effects of biodiversity on ecosystem functioning: a consensus of current knowledge. Ecol. Monogr. 2005, 75(1):3-35.
47. Keeton W.S., Chernyavskyy M., Gratzer G., Main-Knorn M., Shpylchak M., Bihun Y. Structural characteristics and aboveground biomass of old-growth spruce-fir stands in the eastern Carpathian mountains, Ukraine. Plant Biosyst. 2010, 144(1):148-159.
48. Kirby K.R., Potvin C. Variation in carbon storage among tree species: Implications for the management of a small-scale carbon sink project. For. Ecol. Manag. 2007, 246:208-221.
49. Klumpp K., Fontaine S., Attard E., Le Roux X., Gleixner G., Soussana J.-F. Grazing triggers soil carbon loss by altering plant roots and their control on soil microbial activity. J. Ecol. 2009, 97:876-885.
50. Koh L.P. Birds defend oil palms from herbivorous insects. Ecol. Appl. 2008, 18:821-825.
51. Koteen L.E., Baldocchi D.D., Harte J. Invasion of non-native grasses causes a drop in soil carbon storage in California grasslands. Environ. Res. Lett. 2011, 6:044001.
52. Kremen C. Managing ecosystem services: what do we need to know about their ecology?. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:468-479.
53. Lavorel S. Plant functional effects on ecosystem services. J. Ecol. 2013, 101(1):4-8.
54. Lavorel S., Grigulis K. How fundamental plant functional trait relationships scale-up to trade-offs and synergies in ecosystem services. J. Ecol. 2012, 100(1):128-140.
55. Lee Y.-F., McCracken G.F. Dietary variation of Brazilian free-tailed bats links to migratory populations of pest insects. J. Mammal. 2005, 86:67-76.
56. Lee H.-Y., Shih S.-S. Impacts of vegetation changes on the hydraulic and sediment transport characteristics in Guandu mangrove wetland. Ecol. Eng. 2004, 23:85-94.
57. Lorenzen, K., 2001. Using population models to assess culture-based fisheries: a brief review with an application to the analysis of stocking experiments. Reservoir and culture-based fisheries: biology and management. In: De Silva, S.S. (Ed.), Proceedings of the ACIAR, No. 98, Canberra, pp. 257-265.
58. Lorenzen Population dynamics and management of culture-based fisheries. Fish. Manag. Ecol. 1995, 2:61-73.
59. Luck G.W., Harrington R., Harrison P.A., Kremen C., Berry P.M., Bugter R., Dawson T.P., de Bello F., Dia S., Feld C.K., Haslett J.R., Hering D., Kontogianni A., Lavorel S., Rounsevell M., Samways M.J., Sandin L., Settele J., Sykes M.T., Van de Hove S., Vandewalle M., Zobel M. Quantifying the contribution of organisms to the provision of ecosystem services. BioScience 2009, 59(3):223-235.
60. Luck G.W., Daily G.C., Ehrlich P.R. Population diversity and ecosystem services. Trends Ecol. Evol 2003, 18:331-336.
61. Luck G.W., Lavorel S., McIntyre S., Lumb K. Improving the application of vertebrate trait-based frameworks to the study of ecosystem services. J. Anim. Ecol. 2012, 81(5):1065-1076.
62. MA Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis 2005, Millennium Ecosystem Assessment, Island Press, Washington, DC.
63. Mace G.M., Norris K., Fitter A.H. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012, 27:19-26.
64. Mertz O., Ravnborg H.M., Lövei G.L., Nielsen I., Konijnendijk C.C. Ecosystem services and biodiversity in developing countries. Biodivers. Conserv. 2007, 16(10):2729-2737.
65. Mody K., Spoerndli C., Dorn S. Within-orchard variability of the ecosystem service 'parasitism': effects of cultivars, ants and tree location. Basic Appl. Ecol. 2011, 12:456-465.
66. Munoz A.A., Cavieres L.A. The presence of a showy invasive plant disrupts pollinator service and reproductive output in native alpine species only at high densities. J. Ecol. 2008, 96(3):459-467.
67. Oelbermann K., Scheu S. Control of aphids on wheat by generalist predators: Effects of predator density and the presence of alternative prey. Entomol. Exp. et Appl. 2009, 132:225-231.
68. Palomo I., Montes C., Martín-López B., González J.A., García-Llorente M., Alcorlo P., García C. Incorporating the social-ecological approach in protected areas in the Anthropocene. BioScience 2014, 10.1093/biosci/bit033.
69. Papoutsoglou S.E., Petropoulos G., Barbieri R. Polyculture rearing of Cyprinus carpio (L.) and Oreochromis aureus (St.) using a closed circulated system. Aquaculture 1992, 103:311-320.
70. Petheram C., Walker G., Grayson R., Thierfelder T., Zhang L. Towards a framework for predicting impacts of land-use on water recharge: 1. A review of recharge studies in Australia. Aust. J. Soil Res. 2002, 40(3):397-417.
71. Potvin C., Mancilla L., Buchmann N., Monteza J., Moore T., Murphy M., Oelmann Y., Scherer-Lorenzen M., Turner B.L., Wilcke W., Zeugin F., Wolf S. An ecosystem approach to biodiversity effects: carbon pools in a tropical tree plantation. For. Ecol. Manag. 2011, 261:1614-1624.
72. Rey Benayas, J.M., Martins, A., Nicolau, J.M., Schulz, J.J., 2007. Abandonment of agricultural land: an overview of drivers and consequences. CAB Reviews: Perspectives in Agriculture, Veterinary Science, Nutrition and Natural Resources, 2 (057): pp. 14.
73. Rey Benayas J.M., Newton A.C., Diaz A., Bullock J.M. Enhancement of biodiversity and ecosystem services by ecological restoration: a meta-analysis. Science 2009, 325:1121-1124., 10.1126/science.1172460.
74. Schröter M., van der Zanden E.H., van Oudenhoven A.P.E., Remme R.P., Serna-Chavez H.M., de Groot R.S., Opdam P. Ecosystem services as a contested concept: a synthesis of critique and counter-arguments. Conserv. Lett. 2014, 10.1111/conl.12091.
75. Scott D.F., Lesch W. Streamflow responses to afforestation with Eucalyptus grandis and Pinus patula and to felling in Mokobulaan experimental catchments, South Africa. J. Hydrol. 1997, 199:360-377.
76. Scottish Government Getting the Best From our Land: A Land Use Strategy for Scotland 2011, The Scottish Government, Edinburgh.
77. Seidl R., Rammer W., Jäger D., Lexer M.J. Impact of bark beetle (Ips typographus L.) disturbance on timber production and carbon sequestration in different management strategies under climate change. For. Ecol. Manag. 2008, 256:209-220.
78. Seppelt R., Dormann C.F., Eppink F.V., Lautenbach S., Schmidt S. A quantitative review of ecosystem service studies: approaches, shortcomings and the road ahead. J. Appl. Ecol. 2011, 48:630-636., 10.1111/j.1365-2664.2010.01952.x.
79. Sharma C.M., Baduni N.P., Gairola S., Ghildiyal S., Suyal S. Tree diversity and carbon stocks of some major forest types of Garhwal Himalaya, India. For. Ecol. Manag. 2010, 260:2170-2179.
80. Shavit O., Dafni A., Neeman G. Competition between honey bees (Apis mellifera) and native solitary bees in the Mediterranean region of Israel - implications for conservation. Isr. J. Plant Sci. 2009, 57(3):171-183.
81. Smith J.A., Baumgartner L.J., Suthers I.M., Ives M.C., Taylor M.D. Estimating the stocking potential of fish in impoundment by modelling supply and steady-state demand. Freshw. Biol. 2012, 57:1482-1499.
82. Sun D.S., Wesche K., Chen D.D., Zhang S.H., Wu G.L., Du G.Z., Comerford N.B. Grazing depresses soil carbon storage through changing plant biomass and composition in a Tibetan alpine meadow. Plant Soil Environ. 2011, 57(6):271-278.
83. Sun G., Zhou G., Zhang Z., Wei X., McNulty S.G., Vose J.M. Potential water yield reduction due to reforestation across China. J. Hydrol. 2006, 328:548-558.
84. Thomas H., Nisbet T.R. An assessment of the impact of floodplain woodland on flood flows. Water Environ. J. 2006, 21:114-126.
85. van den Berg A.E., Vlek C.A.J., Coeterier J.F. Group differences in the aesthetic evaluation of nature development plans: a multilevel approach. J. Environ. Psychol 1998, 18:141-157.
86. Xu Q., Fujiyama S., Xu H. Biological pest control by enhancing populations of natural enemies in organic farming systems. J. Food Agric. Environ. 2011, 9(2):455-463.
87. Yao Y., Zhu X., Xu Y., Yang H., Wu X., Li Y., Zhang Y. Assessing the visual quality of green landscaping in rural residential areas: the case of Changzhou, China. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012, 184:951-967.
88. Zavaleta E. The economic value of controlling an invasive shrub. AMBIO 2000, 29(8):462-467.
89. Zhao M., Kong Z.-H., Escobedo F.J., Gao J. Impacts of urban forests on offsetting carbon emissions from industrial energy use in Hangzhou, China. J. Environ. Manag. 2010, 91:807-813.
90. Zou C.B., Breshears D.D., Newman B.D., Wilcox B.P., Gard M.A., Rich P.M. Soil water dynamics under low-versus high-ponderosa pine tree density: ecohydrological functioning and restoration implications. Ecohydrology 2008, 1:309-315.