Assessing habitat susceptibility and resistance to invasion by the bioenergy crops switchgrass and Miscanthus × giganteus in California

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volumn 40, Issue , 2012, Pages 143-154

  Barney, Jacob N ^a   Mann, J Jeremiah ^b   Kyser, Guy B ^b   DiTomaso, Joseph M ^b  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Controlled introduction; Giant miscanthus; Invasive species; Miscanthus giganteus; Panicum virgatum; Riparian

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLED INTRODUCTION; INVASIVE SPECIES; MISCANTHUS; PANICUM VIRGATUM; RIPARIAN;

BIOFUELS;

ECOSYSTEMS;

ABOVEGROUND BIOMASS; BIOENERGY; BIOLOGICAL INVASION; COLONIZATION; ENERGY CROP; GRASS; GROWTH RATE; INVASIVE SPECIES; PLANT COMMUNITY; RHIZOME; RIPARIAN VEGETATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL MOISTURE; SURVIVAL;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

MISCANTHUS; PANICUM VIRGATUM;

EID: 84859155598     PISSN: 09619534     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.02.013     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Tilman D., Socolow R., Foley J.A., Hill J., Larson E., Lynd L., et al. Beneficial biofuels-the food, energy, and environment trilemma. Science 2009, 325(5938):270-271.
2. Conner D., Hernandez C. Crops for biofuels: current status and prospects for the future. Biofuels: environmental consequences and interactions with changing land use proceedings of the scientific committee on problems of the environment (SCOPE) international biofuels project rapid assessment 2009, 65-80. Cornell University Press, Ithaca. R.W. Howarth, S. Bringezu (Eds.).
3. Robertson G.P., Dale V.H., Doering O.C., Hamburg S.P., Melillo J.M., Wander M.M., et al. Sustainable biofuels redux. Science 2008, 322(5898):49-50.
4. DiTomaso J.M., Reaser J.K., Dionigi C.P., Doering O.C., Chilton E., Schardt J.D., et al. Biofuel vs bioinvasion: Seeding policy priorities. Environ Sci Technol 2010, 44(18):6906-6910.
5. Barney J.N., DiTomaso J.M. Nonnative species and bioenergy: are we cultivating the next invader?. BioScience 2008, 58(1):64-70.
6. Anderson N.O., Gomez N., Galatowitsch S.M. A non-invasive crop ideotype to reduce invasive potential. Euphytica 2006, 148(1-2):185-202.
7. Raghu S., Anderson R.C., Daehler C.C., Davis A.S., Wiedenmann R.N., Simberloff D., et al. Adding biofuels to the invasive species fire?. Science 2006, 313(5794):1742.
8. Simberloff D. Invasion biologists and the biofuels boom: Cassandras or colleagues?. Weed Sci 2008, 56(6):867-872.
9. Barney J.N., DiTomaso J.M. Invasive species biology, ecology, management, and risk assessment: evaluating and mitigating the invasion risk of biofuel crops. Biotechnology in agriculture and forestry: 66 plant biotechnology for sustainable production of energy and co-products 2010, 263-284. Springer-Verlag, Berlin. P. Mascia, J. Scheffran, S. Thomas, J. Widholm (Eds.).
10. Theoharides K.A., Dukes J.S. Plant invasion across space and time: factors affecting nonindigenous species success during four stages of invasion. New Phytol 2007, 176(2):256-273.
11. Richardson D.M., Blanchard R. Learning from our mistakes: Minimizing problems with invasive biofuel plants. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 2011, 3(1-2):36-42.
12. Barney J.N., DiTomaso J.M. Global climate niche estimates for bioenergy crops and invasive species of agronomic origin: potential problems and opportunities. PLoS ONE 2011, 6(3):e17222.
13. Mack R.N. Cultivation fosters plant naturalization by reducing environmental stochasticity. Biol Invasions 2000, 2(2):111-122.
14. Mack R.N., Lonsdale W.M. Humans as global plant dispersers: Getting more than we bargained for. BioScience 2001, 51(2):95-102.
15. Lockwood J.L., Cassey P., Blackburn T. The role of propagule pressure in explaining species invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 2005, 20(5):223-228.
16. Quinn L., Matlaga D., Stewart J., Davis A. Empirical evidence of long-distance dispersal in Miscanthus sinensis and Miscanthus × giganteus. Invasive Plant Sci Manage 2011, 4(1):142-150.
17. Lewandowski I., Scurlock J.M.O., Lindvall E., Chistou M. The development and current status of perennial rhizomatous grasses as energy crops in the us and europe. Biomass Bioenerg 2003, 25(4):335-361.
18. 4 perennial biomass crops in relation to nitrogen, temperature and water. Biomass Bioenerg 2004, 27(1):21-30.
19. Jorgensen U. Benefits versus risks of growing biofuel crops: the case of. Miscanthus Curr Op Environ Sustain 2010, 3(1-2):1-7.
20. Anonymous New CDFA plant pest ratings list released. Noxious Times 2007, 8(4):7-9.
21. Barney J.N., DiTomaso J.M. Bioclimatic predictions of habitat suitability for the biofuel switchgrass in North America under current and future climate scenarios. Biomass Bioenerg 2010, 34(1):124-133.
22. Levine J.M. Species diversity and biological invasions: Relating local process to community pattern. Science 2000, 288(5467):852-854.
23. Vaghti M., Greco S. Riparian vegetation of the great valley. Terrestrial vegetation of California 2007, 425-455. University of California Press, Berkeley. M. Barbour, T. Keeler-Wolf, A. Schoenherr (Eds.).
24. Marchetti M., Moyle P. Effects of flow regime on fish assemblages in a regulated california stream. Ecol Appl 2001, 11(2):530-539.
25. Von Holle B. Biotic resistance to invader establishment of a Southern Appalachain plant community is determined by environmental conditions. J Ecol 2005, 93(1):16-26.
26. Von Holle B., Simberloff D. Ecological resistance to biological invasion overwhelmed by propagule pressure. Ecology 2005, 86(12):3212-3218.
27. Barney J.N., Mann J.J., Kyser G.B., Blumwald E., Van Deynze A., DiTomaso J.M. Tolerance of switchgrass to extreme soil moisture stress: ecological implications. Plant Sci 2009, 177(6):724-732.
28. Bossard C., Randall J.M. Nonnative plants of California. Terrestrial vegetation of California 2007, 107-123. University of California Press, Berkeley. M. Barbour, T. Keeler-Wolf, A. Schoenherr (Eds.).
29. Clifton-Brown J.C., Lewandowski I. Overwintering problems of newly established Miscanthus plantations can be overcome by identifying genotypes with improved rhizome cold tolerance. New Phytol 2000, 148(2):287-294.
30. Lewandowski I., Clifton-Brown J.C., Scurlock J.M.O., Huisman W. Miscanthus: European experience with a novel energy crop. Biomass Bioenerg 2000, 19(4):209-227.
31. Neukirchen D., Himken M., Lammel J., Czypionka-Krause U., Olfs H.W. Spatial and temporal distribution of the root system and root nutrient content of an established Miscanthus crop. Eur J Agron 1999, 11(3-4):301-309.
32. Parrish D.J., Fike J.H. The biology and agronomy of switchgrass for biofuels. Crit Rev Plant Sci 2005, 24(5):423-459.
33. Porter C.L. An analysis of variance between upland and lowland switchgrass, Panicum virgatum l., in central Oklahoma. Ecology 1966, 47(6):980-992.
34. Davis A.S., Cousens R.D., Hill J., Mack R.N., Simberloff D., Raghu S. Screening bioenergy feedstock crops to mitigate invasion risk. Front Ecol Environ 2010, 8(10):533-539.
35. Schnoor J.L., Doering O.C., Entekhabi D., Hiler E.A., Hullar T.L., Tilman D. Water implications of biofuels production in the United states 2008, The National Academies Press, Washington, D. C.
36. Moles A.T., Gruber M.A.M., Bonser S.P. A new framework for predicting invasive plant species. J Ecol 2008, 96(1):13-17.
37. Buddenhagen C.E., Chimera C., Clifford P. Assessing biofuel crop invasiveness: a case study. PLoS ONE 2009, 4(4). 10.1371/ journal.pone.0005261.
38. Alpert P., Bone E., Holzapfel C. Invasiveness, invasibility and the role of environmental stress in the spread of non-native plants. Perspect Plant Ecol Evol Syst 2000, 3(1):52-66.
39. Richardson D.M., Pyšek P., Rejmanek M., Barbour M.G., Panetta F.D., West C.J. Naturalization and invasion of alien plants: Concepts and definitions. Divers Distrib 2000, 6(2):93-107.
40. Heaton E.A., Dohleman F.G., Long S.P. Meeting US biofuel goals with less land: the potential of. Miscanthus Glob Change Biol 2008, 14(9):2000-2014.
41. Davis M.A., Grime J.P., Thompson K. Fluctuating resources in plant communities: a general theory of invasibility. J Ecol 2000, 88(3):528-534.
42. Britton-Simmons K.H., Abbott K.C. Short- and long-term effects of disturbance and propagule pressure on a biological invasion. J Ecol 2008, 96(1):68-77.
43. Hierro J.L., Villarreal D., Eren O., Graham J.M., Callaway R.M. Disturbance facilitates invasion: the effects are stronger abroad than at home. Am Nat 2006, 168(2):144-156.
44. Hobbs R.J. The nature and effect of disturbance relative to invasions. Biological invasions: a global perspective 1989, 389-405. Wiley & Sons, New York, NY. J.A. Drake, F. Di Castri, R.H. Groves, F.J. Kruger (Eds.).
45. Lockwood J.L., Cassey P., Blackburn T.M. The more you introduce the more you get: the role of colonization pressure and propagule pressure in invasion ecology. Divers Distrib 2009, 15(5):904-910.
46. Riefner R.E., Boyd S. New records of wetland and riparian plants in Southern California, with recommendations and additions to the national list of plant species that occur in wetlands. J Bot Res Inst Texas 2007, 1(1):719-740.