A CRISPR-Cas9 assisted non-homologous end-joining strategy for one-step engineering of bacterial genome

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Su, Tianyuan ^a   Liu, Fapeng ^a   Gu, Pengfei ^a   Jin, Haiying ^a   Chang, Yizhao ^a   Wang, Qian ^a   Liang, Quanfeng ^a   Qi, Qingsheng ^a  

^a SHANDONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL GENE; BACTERIAL GENOME; CHROMOSOME; CLUSTERED REGULARLY INTERSPACED SHORT PALINDROMIC REPEAT; DNA END JOINING REPAIR; DNA TEMPLATE; GENE DELETION; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; BACTERIAL CHROMOSOME; CHROMOSOME DELETION; CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA BREAK; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE TARGETING; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETICS; LACTOSE OPERON; PROCEDURES;

CHROMOSOME DELETION; CHROMOSOMES, BACTERIAL; CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS; DNA BREAKS, DOUBLE-STRANDED; DNA END-JOINING REPAIR; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE TARGETING; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENOME, BACTERIAL; LAC OPERON;

EID: 84997272235     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep37895     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Pines, G., Freed, E. F., Winkler, J. D. & Gill, R. T. Bacterial recombineering: genome engineering via phage-based homologous recombination. Acs Synth Biol 4, 1176-1185, doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.5b00009 (2015).
2. Gu, P. F. et al. A rapid and reliable strategy for chromosomal integration of gene(s) with multiple copies. Sci Rep-Uk 5, doi: ARTN 968410.1038/srep09684 (2015).
3. Smanski, M. J. et al. Synthetic biology to access and expand nature's chemical diversity. Nat Rev Microbiol 14, 135-149, doi: 10.1038/ nrmicro.2015.24 (2016).
4. Esvelt, K. M. & Wang, H. H. Genome-scale engineering for systems and synthetic biology. Mol Syst Biol 9, 641, doi: 10.1038/ msb.2012.66 (2013).
5. Thomason, L. C., Sawitzke, J. A., Li, X., Costantino, N. & Court, D. L. Recombineering: genetic engineering in bacteria using homologous recombination. Curr Protoc Mol Biol 106, 1 1611-1116 39, doi: 10.1002/0471142727.mb0116s106 (2014).
6. Murphy, K. C. Use of bacteriophage lambda recombination functions to promote gene replacement in Escherichia coli. J Bacteriol 180, 2063-2071 (1998).
7. Zhang, Y., Buchholz, F., Muyrers, J. P. & Stewart, A. F. A new logic for DNA engineering using recombination in Escherichia coli. Nat Genet 20, 123-128, doi: 10.1038/2417 (1998).
8. Datsenko, K. A. & Wanner, B. L. One-step inactivation of chromosomal genes in Escherichia coli K-12 using PCR products. P Natl Acad Sci USA 97, 6640-6645, doi: DOI 10.1073/pnas.120163297 (2000).
9. Zeitoun, R. I. et al. Multiplexed tracking of combinatorial genomic mutations in engineered cell populations. Nat Biotechnol 33, 631-637, doi: 10.1038/nbt.3177 (2015).
10. Jiang, W. Y., Bikard, D., Cox, D., Zhang, F. & Marraffini, L. A. RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Biotechnol 31, 233-239, doi: 10.1038/nbt.2508 (2013).
11. Ran, F. A. et al. Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity. Cell 155, 479-480, doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2013.09.040 (2013).
12. Luo, M. L., Leenay, R. T. & Beisel, C. L. Current and future prospects for CRISPR-based tools in bacteria. Biotechnol Bioeng 113, 930-943, doi: 10.1002/bit.25851 (2016).
13. Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819-823, doi: 10.1126/science.1231143 (2013).
14. Mali, P. et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339, 823-826, doi: 10.1126/science.1232033 (2013).
15. Mao, Z., Bozzella, M., Seluanov, A. & Gorbunova, V. DNA repair by nonhomologous end joining and homologous recombination during cell cycle in human cells. Cell Cycle 7, 2902-2906 (2008).
16. Bowater, R. & Doherty, A. J. Making ends meet: repairing breaks in bacterial DNA by non-homologous end-joining. Plos Genet 2, e8, doi: 10.1371/journal.pgen.0020008 (2006).
17. Bassing, C. H. & Alt, F. W. The cellular response to general and programmed DNA double strand breaks. DNA Repair 3, 781-796, doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dnarep.2004.06.001 (2004).
18. Gomaa, A. A. et al. Programmable removal of bacterial strains by use of genome-targeting CRISPR-Cas systems. MBio 5, e00928-00913, doi: 10.1128/mBio.00928-13 (2014).
19. Citorik, R. J., Mimee, M. & Lu, T. K. Sequence-specific antimicrobials using efficiently delivered RNA-guided nucleases. Nat Biotechnol 32, 1141-1145, doi: 10.1038/nbt.3011 (2014).
20. Aravind, L. & Koonin, E. V. Prokaryotic homologs of the eukaryotic DNA-end-binding protein Ku, novel domains in the Ku protein and prediction of a prokaryotic double-strand break repair system. Genome Res 11, 1365-1374, doi: DOI 10.1101/gr.181001 (2001).
21. Della, M. et al. Mycobacterial Ku and ligase proteins constitute a two-component NHEJ repair machine. Science 306, 683-685, doi: 10.1126/science.1099824 (2004).
22. Brissett, N. C. & Doherty, A. J. Repairing DNA double-strand breaks by the prokaryotic non-homologous end-joining pathway. Biochem Soc T 37, 539-545, doi: 10.1042/Bst0370539 (2009).
23. Tong, Y., Charusanti, P., Zhang, L., Weber, T. & Lee, S. Y. CRISPR-Cas9 Based engineering of actinomycetal genomes. Acs Synth Biol 4, 1020-1029, doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.5b00038 (2015).
24. Caliando, B. J. & Voigt, C. A. Targeted DNA degradation using a CRISPR device stably carried in the host genome. Nat Commun 6, 6989, doi: 10.1038/ncomms7989 (2015).
25. Malyarchuk, S. et al. Expression of Mycobacterium tuberculosis Ku and Ligase D in Escherichia coli results in RecA and RecB-independent DNA end-joining at regions of microhomology. DNA Repair (Amst) 6, 1413-1424, doi: 10.1016/j.dnarep.2007.04.004 (2007).
26. Jinek, M. et al. A Programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816-821, doi: 10.1126/science.1225829 (2012).
27. Pagano, A. et al. New small nuclear RNA gene-like transcriptional units as sources of regulatory transcripts. Plos Genet 3, 174-184, doi: ARTN e110.1371/journal.pgen.0030001 (2007).
28. Wang, T., Wei, J. J., Sabatini, D. M. & Lander, E. S. Genetic screens in human cells using the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Science 343, 80-84, doi: 10.1126/science.1246981 (2014).
29. Li, Y. F. et al. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli using CRISPR-Cas9 meditated genome editing. Metab Eng 31, 13-21, doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2015.06.006 (2015).
30. Santos, C. N., Regitsky, D. D. & Yoshikuni, Y. Implementation of stable and complex biological systems through recombinaseassisted genome engineering. Nat Commun 4, 2503, doi: 10.1038/ncomms3503 (2013).
31. Wang, H. et al. Improved seamless mutagenesis by recombineering using ccdB for counterselection. Nucleic Acids Res 42, e37, doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt1339 (2014).
32. Ellis, H. M., Yu, D. G., DiTizio, T. & Court, D. L. High efficiency mutagenesis, repair, and engineering of chromosomal DNA using single-stranded oligonucleotides. P Natl Acad Sci USA 98, 6742-6746, doi: 10.1073/pnas.121164898 (2001).
33. Wang, H. H. et al. Programming cells by multiplex genome engineering and accelerated evolution. Nature 460, 894-898, doi: 10.1038/nature08187 (2009).
34. Ronda, C., Pedersen, L. E., Sommer, M. O. & Nielsen, A. T. CRMAGE: CRISPR optimized MAGE recombineering. Sci Rep 6, 19452, doi: 10.1038/srep19452 (2016).
35. Kolisnychenko, V. et al. Engineering a reduced Escherichia coli genome. Genome Res 12, 640-647, doi: 10.1101/gr.217202 (2002).
36. Tuntufye, H. N. & Goddeeris, B. M. Use of lambda Red-mediated recombineering and Cre/lox for generation of markerless chromosomal deletions in avian pathogenic Escherichia coli. FEMS Microbiol Lett 325, 140-147, doi: 10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02421.x (2011).
37. Jiang, Y. et al. Multigene editing in the Escherichia coli genome via the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Appl Environ Microbiol 81, 2506-2514, doi: 10.1128/AEM.04023-14 (2015).
38. Pyne, M. E., Moo-Young, M., Chung, D. E. A. & Chou, C. P. Coupling the CRISPR/Cas9 system with lambda red recombineering enables simplified chromosomal gene replacement in Escherichia coli. Appl Environ Microb 81, 5103-5114, doi: 10.1128/Aem.01248-15 (2015).
39. Reisch, C. R. & Prather, K. L. J. The no-SCAR (scarless Cas9 assisted recombineering) system for genome editing in Escherichia coli. Sci Rep-Uk 5, doi: ARTN 1509610.1038/srep15096 (2015).
40. Lv, L., Ren, Y. L., Chen, J. C., Wu, Q. & Chen, G. Q. Application of CRISPRi for prokaryotic metabolic engineering involving multiple genes, a case study: Controllable P(3HB-co-4HB) biosynthesis. Metab Eng 29, 160-168, doi: 10.1016/j.ymben.2015.03.013 (2015).
41. Bikard, D. et al. Programmable repression and activation of bacterial gene expression using an engineered CRISPR-Cas system. Nucleic Acids Res 41, 7429-7437, doi: 10.1093/nar/gkt520 (2013).
42. Altenbuchner, J. Editing of the Bacillus subtilis genome by the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Appl Environ Microbiol, doi: 10.1128/ AEM.01453-16 (2016).
43. Standage-Beier, K., Zhang, Q. & Wang, X. Targeted large-scale deletion of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-nickases. Acs Synth Biol 4, 1217-1225, doi: 10.1021/acssynbio.5b00132 (2015).
44. Cui, L. & Bikard, D. Consequences of Cas9 cleavage in the chromosome of Escherichia coli. Nucleic Acids Res, doi: 10.1093/nar/ gkw223 (2016).
45. Peters, J. M. et al. Bacterial CRISPR: accomplishments and prospects. Curr Opin Microbiol 27, 121-126, doi: 10.1016/j. mib.2015.08.007 (2015).
46. Xu, T. et al. Efficient genome editing in Clostridium cellulolyticum via CRISPR-Cas9 nickase. Appl Environ Microbiol 81, 4423-4431, doi: 10.1128/AEM.00873-15 (2015).
47. Shee, C., Ponder, R., Gibson, J. L. & Rosenberg, S. M. What limits the efficiency of double-strand break-dependent stress-induced mutation in Escherichia coli? J Mol Microb Biotech 21, 8-19, doi: 10.1159/000335354 (2011).
48. Shee, C., Gibson, J. L., Darrow, M. C., Gonzalez, C. & Rosenberg, S. M. Impact of a stress-inducible switch to mutagenic repair of DNA breaks on mutation in Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108, 13659-13664, doi: 10.1073/pnas.1104681108 (2011).
49. Zhu, L. J., Li, Y. & Cai, Z. Development of a stress-induced mutagenesis module for autonomous adaptive evolution of Escherichia coli to improve its stress tolerance. Biotechnol Biofuels 8, doi: ARTN 9310.1186/s13068-015-0276-1 (2015).
50. Gibson, D. G. et al. Enzymatic assembly of DNA molecules up to several hundred kilobases. Nat Methods 6, 343-345, doi: 10.1038/ Nmeth.1318 (2009).