The CALL-SLA interface: Insights from a second-order synthesis

Language Learning and Technology

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 17-37

  Plonsky, Luke ^a,b   Ziegler, Nicole ^c,d  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^c University of Hawai'i at Manoa ^*  (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

Meta analysis; Research methods; Second language acquisition

Indexed keywords

EID: 84994651533     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10943501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. Abraham, L. B. (2008). Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(3), 199-226.
2. Aldrich, C. (2009). Learning online with games, simulations, and virtual worlds: Strategies for online instruction. San Francisco, CA: John Wiley.
3. Beatty, K. (2010). Teaching & researching: Computer-assisted language learning. New York, NY: Routledge.
4. Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Schmid, R. F., & Tamim, R. M. (2014). An exploration of bias in meta-analysis: the case of technology integration research in higher education. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(3), 183-209.
5. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2005). Comprehensive Meta-Analysis (Version 2) [Computer software]. Englewood, NJ: Biostat.
6. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. R. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. Chichester, UK: Wiley.
7. Burston, J. (2015). Twenty years of MALL project implementation: A meta-analysis of learning outcomes. ReCALL, 27(1), 4-20.
8. Cerezo, L., Baralt, M., Suh, B. R., & Leow, R. P. (2014). Does the medium really matter in L2 development? The validity of CALL research designs. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(4), 294-310.
9. Chapelle, C. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing, and research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
10. Chapelle, C. (2009). The relationship between second language acquisition theory and computer-assisted language learning. Modern Language Journal, 93(S1), 741-753.
11. Chiu, Y.-H. (2013). Computer-assisted second language vocabulary instruction: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 44, E52-E56.
12. Chiu, Y.-H., Kao, C.-W., & Reynolds, B. L. (2012). The relative effectiveness of digital game-based learning types in English as a foreign language setting: A meta-analysis. British Journal of Educational Technology, 43, E104-E107.
13. Chun, D. (2012). Review article: Replication studies in CALL research. CALICO Journal, 29(4), 591-600.
14. Cohen. J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Cooper, H. (2010). Research synthesis and meta-analysis: A step-by-step approach. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (2009). Introduction. In H. Cooper, L. V. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (pp. 3-16). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.
17. de la Fuente, M. J. (2003). Is SLA interactionist theory relevant to CALL? A study on the effects of computer-mediated interaction in L2 vocabulary acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(1), 47-81.
18. Derrick, D. J. (in press) Instrument reporting practices in second language research. TESOL Quarterly.
19. Felix, U. (2005). What do meta-analyses tell us about CALL effectiveness? ReCALL, 17, 269-288.
20. Felix, U. (2008). The unreasonable effectiveness of CALL: What have we learned in two decades of research? ReCALL, 20, 141-161.
21. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2015). Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (2nd ed.), (pp. 180-206). New York, NY: Routledge.
22. Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., & Freynik, S. (2014). Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27(1), 70-105.
23. Grgurovic, M., Chapelle, C., & Shelley, M. (2013). A meta-analysis of effectiveness studies on computer technology-supported language learning. ReCALL, 25, 165-198.
24. Handley, C. (2014). Constructing an evidence-base for future CALL design with 'engineering power': The need for more basic research and instrumental replication. The EUROCALL Review, 22, 46-56.
25. Higgins, J. P. T., Lane, P. W., Anagnostelis, B., Anzures-Cabrera, J., Baker, N. F., Cappelleri, J. C., & Whitehead, A. (2013). A tool to assess the quality of a meta-analysis. Research Synthesis Methods, 4, 351-366.
26. Journal Article Reporting Standards Working Group (2008). Reporting standards for research in psychology: Why do we need them? What might they be? American Psychologist, 63, 839-851.
27. Lai, C., & Li, G. (2011). Technology and task-based language teaching: A critical review. CALICO Journal, 28, 1-24.
28. Larson-Hall, J., & Plonsky, L. (2015). Reporting and interpreting quantitative research findings: What gets reported and recommendations for the field. Language Learning, 65(S1), 127-159.
29. Lee, J., Jang, J., & Plonsky, L. (2015). The effectiveness of second language pronunciation instruction: A meta-analysis. Applied Linguistics, 36, 345-366.
30. Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309-365.
31. Lin, H. (2012). The effectiveness of computer-mediated communication on SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In L. Bradley & S. Thouësny (Eds.), EUROCALL proceedings (pp. 177-181). Dublin, Ireland: Research-Publishing.net.
32. Lin, H. (2014). Establishing an empirical link between computer-mediated communication (CMC) and SLA: A meta-analysis of the research. Language Learning & Technology, 18, 120-147. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/october2014/lin.pdf
33. Lin, W.-C., Huang, H.-T., & Liou, H.-C. (2013). The effects of text-based SCMC on SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning & Technology, 17, 123-142. Retrieved from http://llt.msu.edu/issues/june2013/linetal.pdf
34. Lipsey, M. W., Puzio, K., Yun, C., Hebert, M. A., Steinka-Fry, K., Cole, M. W., Roberts, M., Anthony, K. S., Busick, M. D. (2012). Translating the statistical representation of the effects of education interventions into more readily interpretable forms. Washington, DC: National Center for Special Education Research, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
35. Liu, M., Moore, Z., Graham, L., & Lee, S. (2002). A look at the research on computer-based technology use in second language learning: A review of the literature from 1990-2000. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34, 250-273.
36. Macaro, E., Handley, Z., & Walter, C. (2012). A systematic review of CALL in English as a second language: Focus on primary and secondary education. Language Teaching, 45, 1-43.
37. Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 407-449). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
38. Moher, D., Liberati, A., Terzlaff, J., & Altman, D. G. (2009). Preferring reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. British Medical Journal, 339, 332-336.
39. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2006). The value and practice of research synthesis for language learning and teaching. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 3-50). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
40. Oswald, F. L., & Plonsky, L. (2010). Meta-analysis in second language research: Choices and challenges. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 30, 85-110.
41. Plonsky, L. (2012). Replication, meta-analysis, and generalizability. In G. Porte (Ed.), Replication research in applied linguistics (pp. 116-132). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
42. Plonsky, L. (2013). Study quality in SLA: An assessment of designs, analyses, and reporting practices in quantitative L2 research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 655-687.
43. Plonsky, L. (2015). Quantitative considerations for improving replicability in CALL and applied linguistics. CALICO Journal, 32, 232-244.
44. Plonsky, L., & Brown, D. (2015). Domain definition and search techniques in meta-analyses of L2 research (Or why 18 meta-analyses of feedback have different results). Second Language Research, 31, 267-278.
45. Plonsky, L., & Gass, S. (2011). Quantitative research methods, study quality, and outcomes: The case of interaction research. Language Learning, 61, 325-366.
46. Plonsky, L., & Kim, Y. (2016). Task-based learner production: A substantive and methodological review. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 73-97.
47. Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2014). How big is "big"? Interpreting effect sizes in L2 research. Language Learning, 64, 878-912.
48. Plonsky, L., & Oswald, F. L. (2015). Meta-analyzing second language research. In L. Plonsky (Ed.), Advancing quantitative methods in second language research (pp. 106-128). New York, NY: Routledge.
49. Porte, G. (2013). Who needs replication research? CALICO Journal, 30, 10-15.
50. Rankin, Y., Gold, R., & Gooch, B. (2006). Evaluating interactive gaming as a language learning tool. Proceedings for ACM SIGGRAPH Conference. Boston, MA.
51. Reinders, H. (Ed.). (2012). Digital games in language learning and teaching. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
52. Sauro, S. (2011). SCMC for SLA: A research synthesis. CALICO Journal, 28, 369-391.
53. Shea, B. J., Grimshaw, J. M., Wells, G. A., Boers, M., Andersson, N., Hamel, C., Porter, A. C., Tugwell, P., Moher, D., & Bouter, L. M. (2007). Development of AMSTAR: A measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 7(10), 1471-2288.
54. Smith, B. (2004). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction and lexical acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 365-398.
55. Smith, B. (2009). The relationship between scrolling, negotiation, and self-initiated self-repair in a SCMC environment. CALICO Journal, 26, 231-245.
56. Smith, B., & Schulze, M. (2013). Thirty years of the CALICO Journal-Replicate, replicate, replicate. CALICO Journal, 30, i-iv.
57. Suh, S., Kim, S. W., & Kim, N. J. (2010). Effectiveness of MMORPG-based instruction in elementary English education in Korea. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 26, 370-378.
58. Tamim, R. M., Bernard, R. M., Borokhovski, E., Abrami, P. C., & Schmid, R. (2011). What forty years of research says about the impact of technology on learning: A second-order meta-analysis and validation study. Review of Educational Research, 81, 4-28.
59. Taylor, A. M. (2006). The effects of CALL versus traditional L1 glosses on L2 reading comprehension. CALICO Journal, 23, 309-318.
60. Taylor, A. M. (2009). CALL-based versus paper-based glosses: Is there a difference in reading comprehension? CALICO Journal, 23, 147-160.
61. Taylor, A. M. (2013). CALL versus paper: In which context are L1 glosses more effective? CALICO Journal, 30, 63-81.
62. Thorne, S. L., Black, R. W., & Sykes, J. M. (2009). Second language use, socialization, and learning in Internet interest communities and online gaming. Modern Language Journal, 93, 802-821.
63. Yun, J. (2011). The effects of hypertext glosses on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24, 39-58.
64. Zhao, Y. (2003). Recent developments in technology and language learning: A literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal, 21, 7-27.
65. Ziegler, N. (2013). Synchronous computer-mediated communication and interaction: A meta-analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Georgetown University, Georgetown, PA.
66. Ziegler, N. (2015). Synchronous computer-mediated communication and interaction: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 1-34, doi:10.1017/S027226311500025X.
67. Ziegler, N. (2016a). Methodological practices in interaction in synchronous computer mediated communication: A synthetic approach. In A. Mackey & E. Marsden (Eds.), Instruments for research into second languages: Empirical studies advancing methodology (pp. 197-223). New York, NY: Routledge.
68. Ziegler, N. (2016b). Taking technology to task: Technology-mediated TBLT, performance, and production. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 36, 136-163.