The unreasonable effectivness of CALL: What have we learned in two decades of research?

ReCALL

Volumn 20, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 141-161

  Felix, Uschi ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

CALL effectiveness; CALL research agenda; meta analyses

Indexed keywords

EID: 69849131068     PISSN: 09583440     EISSN: 14740109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0958344008000323     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Al-Seghayer, K. (2001) The Effect of Multimedia Annotation Modes on L2 Vocabulary Acquisition: A Comparative Study. Language Learning & Technology, 5(1): 202–232.
2. Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1993) The Word Processor as an Instructional Tool: A Meta-Analysis of Word Processing in Writing Instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1): 69–93.
3. Basena, D. and Jamieson, J. (1996) CALL Research in Second Language Learning: 1990-1994. CAELL, 7(1/2): 14-22.
4. Blok, H., Oostdam, R., Otter, M. E. and Overmaat, M. (2002) Computer-assisted instruction in support of beginning reading instruction: A review. Review of Educational Research, 72(1): 101–130.
5. Bonk, C. and Cunningham, D. (1998) Searching for learner-centered, constructivist, and sociocultural components of collaborative educational learning tools. In: Bonk, C. and King, K. (eds.) Electronic collaborators. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 25-50.
6. Chapelle, C. C. and Jamieson, J. J. (1991) Internal and External Validity Issues in Research on CALL Effectiveness. In: Dunkel, P. (ed.) Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Testing. New York: Newbury House, 37-59.
7. Chikamatsu, N. (2003) The effects of computer use on L2 Japanese writing. Foreign Language Annals, 36(1): 114–127.
8. Clark, R. E. (1983) Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4): 445–459.
9. Clark, R. E. (1985) Evidence for Confounding in Computer-Based Instruction Studies: Analyzing the Meta-Analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 33(4): 235–262.
10. Clark, R. E. (1994) Media Will Never Influence Learning. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 42(2): 21–29.
11. Collentine, J. (2000) Insights into the Construction of Grammatical Knowledge Provided by User-Behavior Tracking Technologies. Language Learning & Technology, 3 (2). http://llt.msu.edu/ vol3num2/collentine/.
12. Cooper, H. M. and Hedges, L. V. (1994) Potentials and limitations of research synthesis. In: Cooper, H. M. and Hedges, L. V. (eds.) The Handbook of research synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 521-529.
13. Denonn, L. and Egner, R. (eds) (1992) The Basic Writings of Bertrand Russell. New York: Routledge
14. Dolle, J. and Enjelvin, G. (2004) Investigating ‘VLE-ffectiveness’ in Languages. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 16(5): 469–490.
15. Dunkel, P., (ed.) (1991) Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Testing. New York: Newbury House.
16. Felix, U. (2001) A multivariate analysis of students' experience of Web-based learning. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 17(1): 21–36.
17. Felix, U. (2004) A Multivariate Analysis of Secondary Students' Experience of Web-Based Language Learning. ReCALL, 16(1): 129–141.
18. Felix, U. (2005a) What do meta-analyses tell us about CALL effectiveness? ReCALL, 17(2): 269–288.
19. Felix, U. (2005b) Analyzing recent CALL effectiveness research: Towards a common agenda. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18(1 & 2): 1-32.
20. Felix, U. (2006a) Analyzing the impact of educational technologies on L2 writing. Paper delivered at EUROCALL, Granada, 2006.
21. Felix, U. (2006b) Accelerative Learning: Wonder method or pseudo-scientific gobbledygook. Melbourne: CAE Press.
22. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B. and Smith, M. L. (1981) Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
23. Gravetter, F. J. and Wallnau, L. B. (2000) Statistics for the behavioral sciences (5th ed.).London: Wadsworth/Thomson Learning.
24. Hoven, D. (2004) Methods in our madness? Re-examining the methodological frameworks of our field. Paper presented at the Eleventh International CALL Conference, University of Antwerp.
25. Hubbard, P. (2004) Some Subject, Treatment, and Data Collection Trends in Current CALL Research. Paper presented at the Eleventh International CALL Conference, University of Antwerp.
26. Jamieson, J. and Chapelle, C. (2004) Issues in CALL Evaluation. Paper presented at the Eleventh International CALL Conference, University of Antwerp.
27. Kulik, J. A. (2003) Effects of Using Instructional Technology in Colleges and Universities: What Controlled Evaluation Studies Say (No. P10446.003). Arlington, Virginia.: SRI International.
28. Levy, M. (2004) Interpretations of Context in CALL Research: The Goals, the Data and the Methods. Paper presented at the Eleventh International CALL Conference, University of Antwerp.
29. Liu, M., Moore, Z., Graham, L. and Lee, S. (2002) A look at the research on computer-based technology use in second language learning: A review of the literature from 1990-2000. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3): 250–273.
30. Miech, E. J., Nave, B. and Mosteller, F. (1997): On CALL: A Review of Computer-Assisted Language Learning in U.S. Colleges and Universities. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook, 22: 61-84.
31. Myers, M. J. (2000) Voice Recognition Software and a Hand-Held Translation Machine for Second-Language Learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 13(1): 29–41.
32. Nunan, D. (1992) Research methods in language learning. Cambridge; New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
33. Nutta, J. W., Feyten, C. M., Norwood, A. L., Meros, J. N., Yoshii, M. and Ducher, J. (2002) Exploring new frontiers: What do computers contribute to teaching foreign languages in elementary school? Foreign Language Annals, 35(3): 293–306.
34. Phipps, R. and Merisotis, J. (1999) What's the Difference? A Review of Contemporary Research on the Effectiveness of Distance Learning in Higher Education. http://www.ihep.com/Pubs/ PDF/Difference.pdf.
35. Robson, C. (2002) Real world research: a resource for social scientists and practitioner-researchers (2nd ed.) Oxford: Blackwell.
36. Russell, R. G. (1991) A meta-analysis of word processing and attitudes and the impact on the quality of writing. Paper presented at the The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago.
37. Schafer, W. D. (1999) Methods, plainly speaking: An overview of meta-analysis. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 32(1): 43–61.
38. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D. and Campbell, D. T. (2002) Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
39. Singleton Jr., R. A., Straits, B. C. and Straits, M. M. (1993) Approaches to Social Research (2nd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
40. Slavin, R. E. (1986) Best-evidence synthesis: An alternative to meta-analytic and traditional reviews. Educational Researcher, 15(9): 5–11.
41. Soe, K., Koki, S. and Chang, J. M. (2000) Effect of Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) on Reading Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. http://www.prel.org/products/Products/effect-cai.htm.
42. Suh, J. S. (2002) Effectiveness of Call Writing Instruction: The Voices of Korean EFL Learners. Foreign Language Annals, 35 (6): 669-679.
43. Suri, H. (2000) A Critique of Contemporary Methods of Research Synthesis. Post-Script, 1(1): 49–55.
44. Torgerson, C. J. and Elbourne, D. (2002) A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) on the Teaching of Spelling. Journal of Research in Reading, 25(2): 129–143.
45. Usability first (2002) Usability Glossary. http://www.usabilityfirst.com/glossary/main.cgi?function=search_page.
46. Vincent, J. (2001) The role of visually rich technology in facilitating children's writing. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(3): 242–250.
47. Warschauer, M. (1996) Computer-mediated Collaborative Learning: Theory and Practice. Modern Language Journal, 18(4): 470–481.
48. Weasenforth, D., Biesenbach-Lucas, S. and Meloni, C. (2002) Realizing Constructivist Objectives Through Collaborative Technologies: Threaded Discussions. Language Learning & Technology, 6(3): 58–86.
49. Yeh, S.-W. and Lehman, J. D. (2001) Effects of Learner Control and Learning Strategies on English as a Foreign Language (EFL) Learning from Interactive Hypermedia Lessons. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10(2): 141–159.
50. Zhao, Y. (2001) Recent developments in Technology and language learning: A literature review and meta-analysis. http://ott.educ.msu.edu/elanguage/about/literature.asp.