The relationship between scrolling, negotiation, and self-initiated self-repair in an SCMC environment

CALICO Journal

Volumn 26, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 231-245

  Smith, Bryan ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

CALL Research Methodology; CMC Interaction; Scrolling; Self repair; Synchronous Computer mediated Communication (SCMC)

Indexed keywords

EID: 85044981337     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20569017     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1558/cj.v26i2.231-245     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Foster, P., & Ohta, A. S. (2005). Negotiation for meaning and peer assistance in second language class-rooms. Applied Linguistics, 26, 402-430.
2. Jepson, K. (2005). Conversations and negotiated interaction in text and voice chatrooms. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 79-98. Retrieved November 12, 2008, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol9num3/jepson/default.html
3. Kormos, J. (1999). Monitoring and self-repair in L2. Language Learning, 49, 303-342.
4. Lai, C., & Zhao, Y. (2006). Noticing and text-based chat. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 102-120. Retrieved November 12, 2008, from http://llt.msu.edu/vol10num3/laizhao
5. Lee, L. (2002). Synchronous online exchanges: A study of modification devices on non-native discourse. System, 30, 275-288.
6. Pellettieri, J. (1999). Why-talk? Investigating the role of task-based interaction through synchronous network-based communication among classroom learners of Spanish. Unpublished doctoral dis-sertation, University of California, Davis.
7. Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language research and instruction. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and second language learning (pp. 9–34). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
8. Smith, B. (2003). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction: An expanded model. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 38-57.
9. Smith, B. (2004). Computer-mediated negotiated interaction and lexical acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 365-398.
10. Smith, B. (2008). Methodological hurdles in capturing CMC data: The case of the missing self-repair. Language Learning & Technology, 12(1), 85-103. Retrieved November 12, 2008, from http://llt. msu.edu/vol12num1/smith/default.html
11. Smith, B., & Gorsuch, G. J. (2004). Synchronous computer mediated communication captured by us-ability lab technologies: New interpretations. System, 32, 553-575.
12. Swain, M. K. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
13. Van Hest, E. (1996). Self-repair in L1 and L2 production. Tilburg: Tilburg University Press.
14. Varonis, E., & Gass, S. (1985). Non-native/non-native conversations: A model for negotiation of mean-ing. Applied Linguistics, 6, 71-90.
15. Yuan, Y. (2003). The use of chat rooms in an ESL setting. Computers & Composition, 20, 194-206