What do meta-analyses tell us about CALL effectiveness?

ReCALL

Volumn 17, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 269-288

  Felix, Uschi ^a  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 34248697233     PISSN: 09583440     EISSN: 14740109     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0958344005000923     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1993) The Word Processor as an Instructional Tool: A Meta-Analysis of Word Processing in Writing Instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1): 69-93.
2. Chapelle, C. C. and Jamieson, J. J. (1991) Internal and External Validity Issues in Research on CALL Effectiveness. In: Dunkel, P. (ed.), Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Testing. New York: Newbury House, 37-59.
3. Christmann, E. P. and Badgett, J. L. (1997) Progressive Comparison of the Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction on the Academic Achievement of Secondary Students. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29(4): 325-337.
4. Christmann, E. P., Badgett, J. L. and Lucking, R. (1997) Microcomputer-Based Computer-Assisted Instruction Within Differing Subject Areas: A Statistical Deduction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16(3): 281-296.
5. Clark, R. E. (1983) Reconsidering Research on Learning from Media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4): 445-459.
6. Clark, R. E. (1985) Evidence for Confounding in Computer-Based Instruction Studies: Analyzing the Meta-Analysis. Educational Technology Research and Development, 33(4): 235-262.
7. Clark, R. E. (1994) Media Will Never Influence Learning. Educational Technology, Research and Development, 42(2): 21-29.
8. Cooper, H. M. and Hedges, L. V. (1994) Potentials and limitations of research synthesis. In: Cooper, H. M. and Hedges, L. V. (eds.), The Handbook of Research Synthesis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 521-529.
9. Dunkel, P. (1991) The effectiveness of research on computer-assisted instruction and computer-assisted language learning. In: Dunkel, P. (ed.), Computer-Assisted Language Learning and Testing. New York: Newbury House, 5-36.
10. Felix, U. (2005) Analyzing recent CALL effectiveness research: Towards a common agenda. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 18 (2&3): 1-31.
11. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B. and Smith, M. L. (1981) Meta-analysis in Social Research. Beverly Hills: Sage Publications.
12. Hope, G., Taylor, H. and Pusack, J. (1984) Using Computers in Teaching Foreign Languages. Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
13. Kulik, J. A. (2003) Effects of Using Instructional Technology in Elementary and Secondary Schools: What Controlled Evaluation Studies Say (No. P10446.001). Arlington, VA.: SRI International.
14. Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C. C. and Cohen, P. A. (1980) Effectiveness of computer-based college teaching: A meta-analysis of findings. Review of Education Research, 50(4): 525-544.
15. Kulik, J. A. and Kulik, C. -L. C. (1987) Review of recent literature on computer-based instruction. Contemporary Education Review, 12: 222-230.
16. Kulik, J. A. and Kulik, C. -L. C. (1991) Effectiveness of Computer-Based Instruction: An Updated Analysis. Computers in Human Behavior, 7(1-2): 75-94.
17. Liu, M., Moore, Z., Graham, L. and Lee, S. (2002) A look at the research on computer-based technology use in second language learning: A review of the literature from 1990-2000. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3): 250-273.
18. Miech, E. J., Nave, B. and Mosteller, F. (1997) On CALL: A Review of Computer-Assisted Language Learning in U.S. Colleges and Universities. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook, 22: 61-84.
19. Pederson, K. M. (1987) Research on CALL. In: Smith, W. F. (ed.), Modern Media in Foreign Language Education: Theory and implementation. Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Co, 99-131.
20. Research Centre for New Media in Language Learning http://www.arts.monash.edu.au/lcl/newmedia_in_langlearn/index.htm
21. Roblyer, M. D., Castine, W. H. and King, F. J. (eds.) (1988) Assessing the Impact of Computer-based Instruction: A review of recent research. New York: Haworth Press.
22. Russell, R. G. (1991) A meta-analysis of word processing and attitudes and the impact on the quality of writing. Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
23. Schafer, W. D. (1999) Methods, plainly speaking: An overview of meta-analysis. Measurement and Evaluation in Counseling and Development, 32(1): 43-61.
24. Singhal, M. (1998) Using Computers as Reading Instructional Tools: Applications and Implications. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2/content_storage_01/0000000b/80/25/69/0f.pdf
25. Slavin, R. E. (1986) Best-evidence synthesis: An alternative to meta-analytic and traditional reviews. Educational Researcher, 15(9): 5-11.
26. Suri, H. (2000) A Critique of Contemporary Methods of Research Synthesis. Post-Script, 1(1): 49-55.
27. Zhao, Y. (2001) Recent developments in Technology and language learning: A literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal, 21(1): 7-27.
28. Bangert-Drowns, R. L. (1993) The Word Processor as an Instructional Tool: A Meta-Analysis of Word Processing in Writing Instruction. Review of Educational Research, 63(1): 69-93.
29. Christmann, E. P., Badgett, J. L. and Lucking, R. (1997) Microcomputer-Based Computer-Assisted Instruction Within Differing Subject Areas: A Statistical Deduction. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 16(3): 281-296.
30. Christmann, E. P. and Badgett, J. L. (1997) Progressive Comparison of the Effects of Computer-Assisted Instruction on the Academic Achievement of Secondary Students. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 29(4): 325-337.
31. Soe, K., Koki, S. and Chang, J. M. (2000) Effect of Computer-Assisted Instruction (CAI) on Reading Achievement: A Meta-Analysis. Retrieved 18/2/2004, from http://www.prel.org/products/Products/effect-cai.htm
32. Blok, H., Oostdam, R., Otter, M. E. and Overmaat, M. (2002) Computer-assisted instruction in support of beginning reading instruction: A review. Review of Educational Research, 72(1): 101-130.
33. Singhal, M. (1998) Using Computers as Reading Instructional Tools: Applications and Implications. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICDocs/data/ericdocs2/content_storage_01/0000000b/80/25/69/0f.pdf
34. Torgerson, C. J. and Elbourne, D. (2002) A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of the Effectiveness of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) on the Teaching of Spelling. Journal of Research in Reading, 25(2): 129-143.
35. Kulik, J. A. (2003) Effects of Using Instructional Technology in Elementary and Secondary Schools: What Controlled Evaluation Studies Say (No. P10446.001). Arlington, Virginia: SRI International.
36. Miech, E. J., Nave, B. and Mosteller, F. (1997) On CALL: A Review of Computer-Assisted Language Learning. In: U.S. Colleges and Universities. Educational Media and Technology Yearbook, 22: 61-84.
37. Berger, J. (2001) Effectiveness of Computers in ALBE Classrooms: An Analytical Review of the Literature. Adult Basic Education, 11(3): 162-183.
38. Blok, H., van Daalen-Kapteijns, M. M., Otter, M. E. and Overmaat, M. (2001) Using Computers to Learn Words in the Elementary Grades: An Evaluation Framework and a Review of Effect Studies. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 14(2): 99-128
39. Liu, M., Moore, Z., Graham, L. and Lee, S. (2002) A look at the research on computer-based technology use in second language learning: A review of the literature from 1990-2000. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 34(3): 250-273.