Input, interaction, and output in second language acquisition

Theories in Second Language Acquisition: An Introduction

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 180-206

  Gass, Susan M ^a   Mackey, Alison ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85086980225     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203628942-15     Document Type: Chapter

References (124)

1. Ayoun, D. (2001). The role of negative and positive feedback in the second language acquisition of the passé composé and imparfait. The Modern Language Journal, 85, 226-243.
2. Ammar, A. (2008). Prompts and recasts: Differential effects on second language morphosyntax. Language Teaching Research, 12, 183-210.
3. Ammar, A., & Spada, N. (2006). One size fits all? Recasts, prompts and L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 543-574.
4. Basturkmen, H., Loewen, S., & Ellis, R. (2002). Metalanguage in focus on form in the communicative classroom. Language Awareness, 11, 1-13.
5. Bigelow, M., delMas, R., Hansen, K., & Tarone, E. (2006). Literacy and processing of oral recasts in SLA. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 665-689.
6. Block, D. (2003). The social turn in second language acquisition. Edinburgh, Scotland: Edinburgh University Press.
7. Braidi, S. (2002). Reexamining the role of recasts in native-speaker/nonnative-speaker interactions. Language Learning, 52, 1-42.
8. Bygate, M., Skehan, P., & Swain, M. (Eds.). (2001). Researching pedagogic tasks: Second language learning, teaching, and testing. Harlow, England: Pearson.
9. Byrnes, H. (2005). Review of task-based language learning and teaching. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 297-298.
10. Carpenter, H., Jeon, S., MacGregor, D., & Mackey, A. (2006). Learners’ interpretations of recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 209-236.
11. Carroll, S. (1999). Putting “input” in its proper place. Second Language Research, 15, 337-388.
12. Carroll, S. E. (2001). Input and evidence: The raw material of second language acquisition. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
13. de la Fuente, M. J. (2002). Negotiation and oral acquisition of L2 vocabulary: The roles of input and output in the receptive and productive acquisition of words. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 81-112.
14. Donato, R. (1994). Collective scaffolding in second language learning. In J. Lantolf & G. Appel (Eds.), Vygotskian approaches to second language research (pp. 33-56). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
15. Dornyei, Z. (2009). Individual differences: Interplay of learner characteristics and learning environment. Language Learning, 59 (Suppl. 1), 230-248.
16. Doughty, C., & Varela, E. (1998). Communicative focus on form. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 114-138). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17. Egi, T. (2007). Interpreting recasts as linguistic evidence: The roles of linguistic target, length and degree of change. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 29, 511-537.
18. Ellis, R. (2003). Task-based language learning and teaching. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
19. Ellis, R. (2007). The differential effects of corrective feedback on two grammatical structures. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 339-360). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
20. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., & Erlam, R. (2006). Implicit and explicit corrective feedback and the acquisition of L2 grammar. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 339-368.
21. Ellis, R., & Sheen, Y. (2006). Reexamining the role of recasts in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 575-600.
22. García-Mayo, M., & Alcón-Soler, E. (2013). Negotiated input and output interaction. In J. Herschensohn & M. Young-Scholten (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 209-229). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
23. Gass, S. M. (1997). Input, interaction and the second language learner. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
24. Gass, S. M. (2003). Input and interaction. In C. Doughty & M. H. Long (Eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 224-255). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
25. Gass, S. M., & Alvarez-Torres, M. (2005). Attention when? An investigation of the ordering effect of input and interaction. Studies in Second Language Studies, 27, 1-31.
26. Gass, S. M., Behney, J. N, & Uzum, B. (2013). Inhibitory control, working memory and L2 interaction gains. In K. Drozdzial-Szelest & M. Pawlak (Eds.), Psycholinguistic and sociolinguistic perspectives on second language learning and teaching (pp. 91-114). New York, NY: Springer.
27. Gass, S. M., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
28. Gass, S. M., Mackey, A., & Ross-Feldman, L. (2005). Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 55, 575-611
29. Gass, S. M., Mackey, A, & Ross-Feldman, L. (2011) Task-based interactions in classroom and laboratory settings. Language Learning, 61,189-220.
30. Gass, S. M., & Selinker, L. (2001). Second language acquisition: An introductory course. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
31. Gass, S. M., Svetics, I., & Lemelin, S. (2003). Differential effects of attention. Language Learning, 53, 497-545.
32. Gass, S. M., & Varonis, E. (1985). Variation in native speaker speech modification to nonnative speakers. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7, 37-57.
33. Goo, J. (2012). Corrective feedback and working memory capacity in interaction-driven L2 learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 34, 445-474.
34. Goo, J., & Mackey, A. (2013). The case against the case against recasts. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 35, 127-165.
35. Gor, K., & Long, M. (2009). Input and second language processing. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), The new handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 445-472). New York, NY: Academic Press.
36. Han, Z. (2002). A study of the impact of recasts on tense consistency in L2 output. TESOL Quarterly, 36, 543-572.
37. Hatch, E. (1983). Psycholinguistics: A second language perspective. Rowley, MA: Newbury.
38. Hawkins, B. (1985). Is an “appropriate response” always so appropriate? In S. M. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 162-180). Rowley, MA: Newbury.
39. Ishida, M. (2004). Effects of recasts on the acquisition of the aspectual form -te i- (ru) by learners of Japanese as a foreign language. Language Learning, 54, 311-394.
40. Iwashita, N. (2003). Negative feedback and positive evidence in task-based interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 1-36.
41. Jeon, K. S. (2007). Interaction-driven L2 learning: Characterizing linguistic development. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 379-403). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
42. Jordan, G. (2005). Theory construction in second language acquisition. Amsterdam, Netherlands:John Benjamins.
43. Kim, J., & Han, Z. (2007). Recasts in communicative EFL classes: Do teacher intent and learner interpretation overlap? In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition (pp. 269-297). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
44. Keck, C., Iberri-Shea, G., Tracy-Ventura, N., & Wa-Mbaleka, S. (2006). In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 91-131). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
45. Kleifgen, J. (1985). Skilled variation in a kindergarten teacher’s use of foreigner talk. In S. M. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 59-68). Rowley, MA: Newbury.
46. Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practices in second language acquisition. Oxford, England:Pergamon.
47. Krashen, S. (1985). The Input Hypothesis: Issues and complications. London, England: Longman.
48. Leeman, J. (2003). Recasts and second language development: Beyond negative evidence. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 37-63.
49. Leeser, M. J. (2004). Learner proficiency and focus on form during collaborative dialogue. Language Teaching Research, 8, 55-81.
50. Li, S. (2010). The effectiveness of corrective feedback in SLA: A meta-analysis. Language Learning, 60, 309-365.
51. Loewen, S., & Philp, J. (2006). Recasts in the adult English L2 classroom: Characteristics, explicitness and effectiveness. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 536-556.
52. Long, M. H. (1996). The role of the linguistic environment in second language acquisition. In W. Ritchie & T. Bhatia (Eds.), Handbook of language acquisition: Vol. 2. Second language acquisition (pp. 413-468). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
53. Long, M. H., & Robinson, P. (1998). Focus on form: Theory, research, and practice. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 15-41). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
54. Lyster, R. (1998a). Recasts, repetition, and ambiguity in L2 classroom discourse. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 20, 51-81.
55. Lyster, R. (1998b). Negotiation of form, recasts, and explicit correction in relation to error types and learner repair in immersion classrooms. Language Learning, 48, 183-218.
56. Lyster, R. (2004). Differential effects of prompts and recasts inform-focused instruction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 26, 399-432.
57. Lyster, R., & Izquierdo, J. (2009). Prompts versus recasts in dyadic interaction. Language Learning, 59 (2), 453-498.
58. Lyster, R., & Saito, Y. (2010). Oral feedback in classroom SLA: A meta-analysis. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 32, 265-302.
59. Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557-587.
60. Mackey, A. (2000). Feedback, noticing and second language development: An empirical study of L2 classroom interaction. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the British Association for Applied Linguistics, Cambridge, England.
61. Mackey, A. (2006). Feedback, noticing and instructed second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 27, 405-430.
62. Mackey, A. (2012). Input, interaction and corrective feedback in L2 learning. Oxford, England:Oxford University Press.
63. Mackey, A., Abbuhl, R., & Gass, S. (2012). Interactionist approach. In S. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 7-23). New York, NY:Routledge.
64. Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
65. Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2006). Introduction: Methodological innovation in interaction research. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 28, 169-178.
66. Mackey, A., & Gass, S. (2007). Data elicitation for second and foreign language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
67. Mackey, A., Gass, S., & McDonough, K. (2000). How do learners perceive interactional feedback? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22, 471-497.
68. Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2007). Interaction research in SLA: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 407-449). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
69. Mackey, A., & Goo, J. (2012). Interaction approach in second language acquisition. In C. Chapelle (Ed.), The Encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 2748-2758). Malden, MA:Wiley-Blackwell.
70. Mackey, A., & Oliver, R. (2002). Interactional feedback and children’s L2 development. System, 30, 459-477.
71. Mackey, A., & Philp, J. (1998). Conversational interaction and second language development:Recasts, responses, and red herrings? Modern Language Journal, 82, 338-356.
72. Mackey, A., Philp, J., Egi, T., Fujii, A., & Tatsumi, T. (2002) Individual differences in working memory, noticing of interactional feedback and L2 development. In P. Robinson & P. Skehan (Eds.), Individual differences in L2 learning (pp. 181-208). Amsterdam, Netherlands:John Benjamins.
73. Mackey, A., & Sachs, R. (2012). Older learners in SLA research: A first look at working memory, feedback, and L2 development. Language Learning, 62, 704-740.
74. Mackey, A., & Silver, R. E. (2005). Interactional tasks and English L2 learning by immigrant children in Singapore. System, 32, 239-260.
75. McDonough, K. (2005). Identifying the impact of negative feedback and learners’ responses on ESL question development. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 27, 79-103.
76. McDonough, K. (2007). Interactional feedback and the emergence of simple past activity verbs in L2 English. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 323-338). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
77. McDonough, K., & Mackey, A. (2006). Responses to recasts: Repetitions, primed production and linguistic development. Language Learning, 56, 693-720.
78. McLaughlin, B. (1987). Theories of second-language learning. London, England: Arnold.
79. Morris, F. A. (2002). Negotiation moves and recasts in relation to error types and learner repair in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 35, 395-404.
80. Muranoi, H. (2000). Focus on form through interaction enhancement: Integrating formal instruction into a communicative task in EFL classrooms. Language Learning, 50, 617-673.
81. Nassaji, H. (2009). Effects of recasts and elicitations in dyadic interaction and the role of feedback. Language Learning, 59, 411-452.
82. Nicholas, H., Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (2001). Recasts as feedback to language learners. Language Learning, 51, 719-758.
83. Norris, J. M., & Ortega, L. (2000). Effectiveness of L2 instruction: A research synthesis and quantitative meta-analysis. Language Learning, 50, 417-528.
84. Oliver, R., & Mackey, A. (2003). Interactional context and feedback in child ESL classrooms. The Modern Language Journal, 87, 519-533.
85. Philp, J. (2003). Constraints on “noticing the gap”: Nonnative speakers’ noticing of recasts in NS-NNS interaction. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 99-126.
86. Philp, J., & Mackey, A. (2010). Interaction research: What can socially informed approaches offer to cognitivists (and vice versa)? In R. Batstone (Ed.), Sociocognitive perspectives on language use and language learning (pp. 210-227). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
87. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes, and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527.
88. Pica, T. (1996). Second language learning through interaction: Multiple perspectives. University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Educational Linguistics, 12, 1-22.
89. Pica, T. (1998). Second language learning through interaction: Multiple perspectives. In V. Regan (Ed.), Contemporary approaches to second language acquisition (pp. 1-31). Dublin, Ireland: University of Dublin Press.
90. Pica, T., Kanagy, R., & Falodun, J. (1993). Choosing and using communication tasks for second language instruction and research. In G. Crookes & S. M. Gass (Eds.), Tasks and language learning: Integrating theory and practice (pp. 9-34). Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
91. Plonsky, L., & Gass, S. (2011). Quantitative research methods, study quality, and outcomes:The case of interaction research. Language Learning, 61, 325-366.
92. Posner, M. I. (1988). Structures and functions of selective attention. In T. Boll & B. Bryant (Eds.), Clinical neuropsychology and brain function: Research, measurement, and practice (pp. 173-201). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
93. Posner, M. I. (1992). Attention as a cognitive and neural system. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 1, 11-14.
94. Posner, M. I., & Peterson, S. (1990). The attention system of the human brain. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 13, 25-42.
95. Ramírez, A. G. (2005). Review of the social turn in second language acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 89, 292-293.
96. Révész, A. (2012). Working memory and the observed effectiveness of recasts in different L2 outcome measures. Language Learning, 62, 93-132.
97. Révész, A., & Han, Z. (2006). Task content familiarity, task type and efficacy of recasts. Language Awareness, 15, 160-178.
98. Robinson, P. (1995). Review article: Attention, memory and the “noticing” hypothesis. Language Learning, 45, 283-331.
99. Robinson, P. (Ed.). (2001). Cognition and second language instruction. Cambridge, England:Cambridge University Press.
100. Robinson, P. (Ed.). (2002). Individual differences and instructed language learning. Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamins.
101. Russell, J., & Spada, N. (2006). The effectiveness of corrective feedback for the acquisition of L2 grammar: A meta-analysis of the research. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 133-164). Philadelphia, PA:John Benjamins.
102. Sachs, R., & Suh, B.-R. (2007). Textually enhanced recasts, learner awareness, and L2 outcomes in synchronous computer-mediated interaction. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 197-227). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
103. Sagarra, N. (2007). From CALL to face-to-face interaction: The effect of computer-delivered recasts and working memory on L2 development. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A collection of empirical studies (pp. 229-248). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
104. Saxton, M. (1997). The contrast theory of negative input. Journal of Child Language, 24, 139-161.
105. Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129-158.
106. Schmidt, R. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed.), Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3-32). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
107. Schmidt, R., & Frota, S. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language:A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn:Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237-326). Rowley, MA: Newbury.
108. Sheen, Y. (2007). The effect of focus written corrective feedback and language aptitude on ESL learners’ acquisition of articles. TESOL Quarterly, 41, 255-283.
109. Sheen, Y. (2008). Recasts, language anxiety, modified output, and L2 learning. Language Learning, 58, 835-874.
110. Smith, B. (2012). Eye tracking as a measure of noticing: A study of explicit recasts in SCMC. Language Learning & Technology, 16, 53-81.
111. Storch, N. (2002). Patterns of interaction in ESL pair work. Language Learning, 52, 119-158.
112. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury.
113. Swain, M. (1993). The Output Hypothesis: Just speaking and writing aren’t enough. Canadian Modern Language Review, 50, 158-164.
114. Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125-144). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
115. Swain, M. (1998). Focus on form through conscious reflection. In C. Doughty & J. Williams (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 64-81). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
116. Swain, M. (2005). The Output Hypothesis: Theory and research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook on research in second language learning and teaching (pp. 471-483). Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
117. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1998). Interaction and second language learning: Two adolescent French immersion students working together. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 320-337.
118. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (2002). Talking it through: Two French immersion learners’ response to reformulation. International Journal of Educational Research, 37, 285-304.
119. Tomlin, R., & Villa, V. (1994). Attention in cognitive science and second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 183-203.
120. Trofimovich, P., Ammar, A., & Gatbonton, E. (2007). How effective are recasts? The role of attention, memory, and analytical ability. In A. Mackey (Ed.), Conversational interaction in second language acquisition: A series of empirical studies. (pp. 171-195). Oxford, England:Oxford University Press.
121. Van den Branden, K. (1997). Effects of negotiation on language learners’ output. Language Learning, 47, 589-636.
122. Wagner-Gough, J., & Hatch, E. (1975). The importance of input data in second language acquisition studies. Language Learning, 25, 297-308.
123. Williams, J. (1999). Learner-generated attention to form. Language Learning, 51, 303-346.
124. Williams, J. (2001). The effectiveness of spontaneous attention to form. System, 29, 325-340.