The effects of hypertext glosses on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A meta-analysis

Computer Assisted Language Learning

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 39-58

  Yun, Jeehwan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

CALL; Hypertext gloss; L2 reading; Vocabulary acquisition

Indexed keywords

EID: 79251546789     PISSN: 09588221     EISSN: 17443210     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09588221.2010.523285     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Abraham, L.B. (2008). Computer-mediated glosses in second language reading comprehension and vocabulary learning: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(3), 199-226.
2. Abuseileek, A.F.M. (2008). Preferences and effect on EFL reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition. CALICO Journal, 25, 260-275.
3. Akbulut, Y. (2007a). Effects of multimedia annotations on incidental vocabulary learning and reading comprehension of advanced learners of English as a foreign language. Instructional Science, 35, 499-517.
4. Akbulut, Y. (2007b). Variable predicting foreign language reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition in a linear hypermedia environment. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 6(1). Retrieved July 20, 2008, from http://www.tojet.net/articles/615.htm
5. Al-Seghayer, K. (2001). The effect of multimedia annotation modes on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A comparative study. Language Learning & Technology, 5(1), 202-232.
6. Ariew, R. (2006). A template to generate hypertext and hypermedia reading materials: Its design and associated research findings. The Reading Matrix, 6(3), 195-209.
7. Aust, R., Kelly, M.J., & Roby, W. (1993). The use of hyper-reference and conventional dictionaries. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(4), 63-73.
8. Chandler, P., & Sweller, J. (1991). Cognitive load theory and the format of instruction. Cognition and Instruction, 8(4), 293-332.
9. Chun, D. (2006). Calling on CALL: From theory and research to new directions in foreign language teaching. CALICO Journal, 5, 69-98.
10. Chun, D.M., & Plass, J.L. (1996). Effects of multimedia annotations on vocabulary acquisition. The Modern Language Journal, 80(2), 183-198.
11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Gettys, S., Imhof, L.A., & Kautz, J.O. (2001). Computer-assisted reading: The effect of glossing format on comprehension and vocabulary retention. Foreign Language Annals, 34, 91-106.
13. Glass, G.V. (1976). Primary, secondary, and meta-analysis of research. Educational Researcher, 5, 3-8.
14. Jones, L.C., & Plass, J.L. (2002). Supporting listening comprehension and vocabulary acquisition in French with multimedia annotations. TheModern Language Journal, 86(4), 546-561.
15. Khan, B.H. (1997). Web-based instruction. New Jersey: Educational Technology Publications.
16. Kommers, P.A.M., Grabinger, S., & Dunlap, J.C. (1996). Hypermedia learning environments: Instructional design and integration. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Kost, C., Foss, P., & Lenzini, J. (1999). Textual and pictorial gloss: Effectiveness on incidental vocabulary growth when reading in a foreign language. Foreign Language Annals, 32(1), 89-113.
18. Koyama, T., & Takeuchi, O. (2004). How look-up frequency affects EFL learning? An empirical study on the use of handheld-electronic dictionaries. Paper presented at the 2004 CLaSIC Conference. Retrieved July 20, 2008, from http://www.paccall.org/2004/2004proceedings_papers/koyama.pdf
19. Levine, A., Bejarano, Y., Carrell, P., & Vered, L. (2004). Comparing dictionary definitions and glosses in hypertext foreign language reading. The CATESOL Journal, 16(1), 59-68.
20. Liao, Y.C. (1999). Effects of hypermedia on students' achievement: A meta-analysis. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 8(3), 255-277.
21. Lim, K.M., & Shen, H.Z. (2006). Integration of computers into an EFL reading classroom. ReCALL, 18(2), 212-229.
22. Lipsey, M., & Wilson, D. (2001). Practical meta-analysis. Applied Social Research Methods Series (Vol. 49). Beverly Hills: Sage.
23. Lomicka, L. (1998). "To gloss or not to gloss": An investigation of reading comprehension online. Language Learning & Technology, 1(2), 41-50.
24. Martinez-Lage, A. (1997). Hypermedia technology for teaching reading. In M. Bush & R. Terry (Eds.), Technology-enhanced language learning (pp. 121-163). Lincolnwood, IL: National Textbook Company.
25. Mayer, R.E. (1997). Multimedia learning: Are we asking the right questions? Educational Psychologist, 32(1), 1-19.
26. Nagata, N. (1999). The effectiveness of computer-assisted interactive glosses. Foreign Language Annals, 32(4), 469-479.
27. Nation, I.S.P. (1983). Teaching and learning vocabulary. Wellington: English Language Institute, Victoria University. (Reprinted from "To gloss or not to gloss": An investigation of reading comprehension online (pp. 41), by Lomicka, L., Language Learning & Technology, 1(2).)
28. Nelson, T. A file structure for the complex, the changing, and the indeterminate. Association for Computing Machinery: Proceedings of 20th National Conference, 1965 (pp. 84-100).
29. Nikolova, O.R. (2002). Effects of learners' participation in authoring of multimedia materials on student acquisition of vocabulary. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 100-122.
30. Nikolova, O.R. (2004). Effects of visible and invisible hyperlinks on vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension for high-and average-foreign language achievers. ALSIC, 7(1), 29-53. Retrieved July 16, 2008, from http://alsic.u-strasbg.fr/v07/nikolova/alsic_v07_05-rec1v2.htm
31. Paivio, A., & Lambert, W. (1981). Dual coding and bilingual memory. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 20, 532-539.
32. Paivio, A. (1986). Mental representation: A dual-coding approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
33. Pak, J. (1986). The effect of vocabulary glossing on ESL reading comprehension. Unpublished manuscript, University of Hawaii at Manoa. (Reprinted from "To gloss or not to gloss": An investigation of reading comprehension online (pp. 41), by Lomicka, L., Language Learning & Technology, 1(2).)
34. Pearson, P.D., Ferdig, R.E., Blomeyer, R.L., & Moran, J. (2005). The effects of technology on reading performance in the middle-school grades: A meta-analysis with recommendations for policy. Reports from Learning Points Associates. Retrieved February 20, 2008, from http://www.ncrel.org/tech/reading/index.html
35. Plass, J.L., Chun, D.M., Mayer, R.E., & Leutner, D. (1998). Supporting visual and verbal learning preferences in a second-language multimedia learning environment. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90(1), 25-36.
36. Plass, J.L., Chun, D.M., Mayer, R.E., & Leutner, D. (2003). Cognitive load in reading a foreign language text with multimedia aids and the influence of verbal and spatial abilities. Computers in Human Behavior, 19, 221-243.
37. Robin, R. (2007). Commentary: Learner-based listening and technological authenticity. Language Learning & Technology, 11(1), 109-115.
38. Roby, W. (1999). What is in a gloss? Language Learning & Technology, 2(2), 94-101.
39. Rogers, D.L. (2000). A paradigm shift: Technology integration for higher education in the new millennium. Educational Technology Review, 13, 19-27.
40. Rogers, E.M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.
41. Rosenthal, R. (1995). Writing meta-analytic reviews. Psychological Bulletin, 18(2), 183-192.
42. Rouet, J.F., Levonen, J.J., Dillon, A., & Spiro, R.J. (1996). Hypertext and cognition. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Sakar, A., & Ercetin, G. (2004). Effectiveness of hypermedia annotations for foreign language reading. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 21, 28-38.
44. Salem, E., & Aust, R. (2007). The influence of feature-rich computerized glosses on reading comprehension and vocabulary acquisition. WBED'07 Proceedings of the sixth conference on IASTED International Conference Web-Based Education, Volume 2 (pp. 663-668). New York: ACM.
45. Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4, 295-312.
46. Taylor, A. (2006). The effects of CALL versus traditional L1 glosses on L2 reading comprehension. CALICO Journal, 23(2), 309-318.
47. Weisz, J.R., Weiss, B., & Donenberg, G.R. (1992). The lab versus the clinic: Effects of child and adolescent psychotherapy. American Psychologist, 47, 1578-1585.
48. Yeh, Y., & Wang, C. (2003). Effects of multimedia vocabulary annotations and learning styles on vocabulary learning. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 131-144.
49. Yoshii, M. (2006). L1 and L2 glosses: Their effects on incidental vocabulary learning. Language Learning & Technology, 10(3), 85-101.
50. Yoshii, M., & Flaitz, J. (2002). Second language incidental vocabulary retention: The effect of text and picture annotation types. CALICO Journal, 20(1), 33-58.
51. Zhao, Y. (2003). Recent developments in technology and language learning: A literature review and meta-analysis. CALICO Journal, 21(1), 7-27.