Open source molecular modeling

Journal of Molecular Graphics and Modelling

Volumn 69, Issue , 2016, Pages 127-143

  Pirhadi, Somayeh ^b   Sunseri, Jocelyn ^a   Koes, David Ryan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b ISLAMIC AZAD UNIVERSITY   (Iran)

Author keywords

Cheminformatics; Molecular modeling; Open source; Software

Indexed keywords

APPLICATION PROGRAMS; COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; MOLECULAR MODELING; OPEN SYSTEMS; SOFTWARE DESIGN; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

CHEMINFORMATICS; MODEL APPLICATION; ONLINE VERSIONS; OPEN SOURCES; QUALITY SOFTWARE;

OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE;

LIGAND;

AB INITIO CALCULATION; ARTICLE; BIOINFORMATICS; CLICK CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER INTERFACE; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR MODEL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION; QUANTUM CHEMISTRY; SOFTWARE; INTERNET; PRECLINICAL STUDY; QUANTUM THEORY; THERMODYNAMICS;

DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; INTERNET; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; QUANTITATIVE STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; QUANTUM THEORY; SOFTWARE; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 84987678779     PISSN: 10933263     EISSN: 18734243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmgm.2016.07.008     Document Type: Article

References (188)

1. [1] Krylov, A.I., Herbert, J.M., Furche, F., Head-Gordon, M., Knowles, P.J., Lindh, R., Manby, F.R., Pulay, P., Skylaris, C.-K., Werner, H.-J., What is the price of open-source software?. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6:14 (2015), 2751–2754, 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b01258.
2. [2] Gezelter, J.D., Open source and open data should be standard practices. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 6:7 (2015), 1168–1169, 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b00285.
3. [3] Jacob, C.R., How open is commercial scientific software?. J. Phys. Chem. Lett. 7:2 (2016), 351–353, 10.1021/acs.jpclett.5b02609.
4. [4] Villoutreix, B.O., Lagorce, D., Labbé, C.M., Sperandio, O., Miteva, M.A., One hundred thousand mouse clicks down the road: selected online resources supporting drug discovery collected over a decade. Drug Discov. Today 18:21–22 (2013), 1081–1089, 10.1016/j.drudis.2013.06.013.
5. [5] Leach, A.R., Gillet, V.J., An Introduction to Chemoinformatics. 2007, Springer Science + Business Media, 10.1007/978-1-4020-6291-9.
6. [6] Gasteiger, J., Introduction. Chemoinformatics, 2003, Wiley-Blackwell, 1–13, 10.1002/3527601643.ch1.
7. [7] Ebejer, J.-P., Morris, G.M., Deane, C.M., Freely available conformer generation methods: how good are they?. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 52:5 (2012), 1146–1158, 10.1021/ci2004658.
8. [8] Hildebrandt, A., Dehof, A., Rurainski, A., Bertsch, A., Schumann, M., Toussaint, N.C., Moll, A., Stöckel, D., Nickels, S., Mueller, S.C., Lenhof, H.-P., Kohlbacher, O., BALL – biochemical algorithms library 1.3. BMC Bioinform., 11(1), 2010, 531, 10.1186/1471-2105-11-531.
9. [9] Steinbeck, C., Hoppe, C., Kuhn, S., Floris, M., Guha, R., Willighagen, E., Recent developments of the chemistry development kit (CDK) – an open-source Java library for chemo- and bioinformatics. CPD 12:17 (2006), 2111–2120, 10.2174/138161206777585274.
10. [10] Höck, S., Riedl, R., chemf: a purely functional chemistry toolkit. J. Cheminform., 4(1), 2012, 38, 10.1186/1758-2946-4-38.
11. [11] Dalke, A., chemfp-fast and portable fingerprint formats and tools. J. Cheminform., 3(S-1), 2011, 12.
12. [12] Cao, Y., Charisi, A., Cheng, L.-C., Jiang, T., Girke, T., ChemmineR: a compound mining framework for R. Bioinformatics 24:15 (2008), 1733–1734, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btn307.
13. [13] O'Boyle, N.M., Hutchison, G.R., Cinfony – combining open source cheminformatics toolkits behind a common interface. Chem. Cent. J., 2(1), 2008, 24, 10.1186/1752-153x-2-24.
14. [14] Drefahl, A., CurlySMILES: a chemical language to customize and annotate encodings of molecular and nanodevice structures. J. Cheminform., 3(1), 2011, 1, 10.1186/1758-2946-3-1.
15. [15] Wójcikowski, M., Zielenkiewicz, P., Siedlecki, P., DiSCuS: an open platform for (not only) virtual screening results management. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 54:1 (2014), 347–354, 10.1021/ci400587f.
16. [16] Supady, A., Blum, V., Baldauf, C., First-principles molecular structure search with a genetic algorithm. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 55:11 (2015), 2338–2348, 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00243.
17. [17] Wang, Y., Backman, T.W.H., Horan, K., Girke, T., fmcsR: mismatch tolerant maximum common substructure searching in R. Bioinformatics 29:21 (2013), 2792–2794, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt475.
18. [18] Pavlov, D., Rybalkin, M., Karulin, B., Kozhevnikov, M., Savelyev, A., Churinov, A., Indigo: universal cheminformatics API. J. Cheminform., 3(Suppl. 1), 2011, P4, 10.1186/1758-2946-3-s1-p4.
19. [19] Lawson, K.R., Lawson, J., LICSS – a chemical spreadsheet in microsoft excel. J. Cheminform., 4(1), 2012, 3, 10.1186/1758-2946-4-3.
20. [20] Sud, M., MayaChemTools: an open source package for computational discovery. 243rd ACS National Meeting & Exposition, San Diego, CA, 2012.
21. [21] Wójcikowski, M., Zielenkiewicz, P., Siedlecki, P., Open Drug Discovery Toolkit (ODDT): a new open-source player in the drug discovery field. J. Cheminform., 7(1), 2015, 10.1186/s13321-015-0078-2.
22. [22] O'Boyle, N.M., Banck, M., James, C.A., Morley, C., Vandermeersch, T., Hutchison, G.R., Open Babel: an open chemical toolbox. J. Cheminform., 3(1), 2011, 33, 10.1186/1758-2946-3-33.
23. [23] Lowe, D.M., Corbett, P.T., Murray-Rust, P., Glen, R.C., Chemical name to structure: OPSIN an open source solution. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 51:3 (2011), 739–753, 10.1021/ci100384d.
24. [24] Rijnbeek, M., Steinbeck, C., OrChem – an open source chemistry search engine for Oracle®. J. Cheminform., 1(1), 2009, 17, 10.1186/1758-2946-1-17.
25. [25] Filippov, I.V., Nicklaus, M.C., Optical structure recognition software to recover chemical information: OSRA an open source solution. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 49:3 (2009), 740–743, 10.1021/ci800067r.
26. [26] O'Boyle, N.M., Morley, C., Hutchison, G.R., Pybel: a Python wrapper for the OpenBabel cheminformatics toolkit. Chem. Cent. J., 2(1), 2008, 5, 10.1186/1752-153x-2-5.
27. [27] Guha, R., et al. Chemical informatics functionality in R. J. Stat. Softw. 18:5 (2007), 1–16.
28. [28] Smith, R., Williamson, R., Ventura, D., Prince, J.T., Rubabel: wrapping open Babel with Ruby. J. Cheminform., 5(1), 2013, 35, 10.1186/1758-2946-5-35.
29. [29] Rahman, S., Bashton, M., Holliday, G.L., Schrader, R., Thornton, J.M., Small Molecule Subgraph Detector (SMSD) toolkit. J. Cheminform., 1(1), 2009, 12, 10.1186/1758-2946-1-12.
30. [30] Amani, P., Sneyd, T., Preston, S., Young, N.D., Mason, L., Bailey, U.-M., Baell, J., Camp, D., Gasser, R.B., Gorse, A.-D., Taylor, P., Hofmann, A., A practical Java tool for small-molecule compound appraisal. J. Cheminform., 7(1), 2015, 10.1186/s13321-015-0079-1.
31. [31] Haider, N., Functionality pattern matching as an efficient complementary structure/reaction search tool: an open-source approach. Molecules 15:8 (2010), 5079–5092, 10.3390/molecules15085079.
32. [32] Miteva, M.A., Guyon, F., Tuffery, P., Frog2: efficient 3D conformation ensemble generator for small compounds. Nucleic Acids Res. 38:Web Server (2010), W622–W627, 10.1093/nar/gkq325.
33. [33] Bruns, R.F., Watson, I.A., Rules for identifying potentially reactive or promiscuous compounds. J. Med. Chem. 55:22 (2012), 9763–9772, 10.1021/jm301008n.
34. [34] Hoksza, D., Škoda, P., Voršilák, M., Svozil, D., Molpher: a software framework for systematic chemical space exploration. J. Cheminform., 6(1), 2014, 7, 10.1186/1758-2946-6-7.
35. [35] Borgelt, C., Meinl, T., Berthold, M., MoSS. Proceedings of the 1st International Workshop on Open Source Data Mining Frequent Pattern Mining Implementations – OSDM '05, Association for Computing Machinery (ACM), 2005, 10.1145/1133905.1133908.
36. [36] Peironcely, J.E., Rojas-Chertó, M., Fichera, D., Reijmers, T., Coulier, L., Faulon, J.-L., Hankemeier, T., OMG: open molecule generator. J. Cheminform., 4(1), 2012, 21, 10.1186/1758-2946-4-21.
37. [37] Tosco, P., Balle, T., Shiri, F., SDF2XYZ2SDF: how to exploit TINKER power in cheminformatics projects. J. Mol. Model. 17:11 (2011), 3021–3023, 10.1007/s00894-011-1111-7.
38. [38] Rosen, J., Miguet, L., Pérez, S., Shape: automatic conformation prediction of carbohydrates using a genetic algorithm. J. Cheminform., 1(1), 2009, 16, 10.1186/1758-2946-1-16.
39. [39] Jeliazkova, N., Jeliazkov, V., AMBIT RESTful web services: an implementation of the OpenTox application programming interface. J. Cheminform., 3(1), 2011, 18, 10.1186/1758-2946-3-18.
40. [40] Spjuth, O., Alvarsson, J., Berg, A., Eklund, M., Kuhn, S., Mäsak, C., Torrance, G., Wagener, J., Willighagen, E.L., Steinbeck, C., Wikberg, J.E., Bioclipse 2: a scriptable integration platform for the life sciences. BMC Bioinform., 10(1), 2009, 397, 10.1186/1471-2105-10-397.
41. [41] Goecks, J., Nekrutenko, A., Taylor, J., Team, T.G., Galaxy: a comprehensive approach for supporting accessible reproducible, and transparent computational research in the life sciences. Genome Biol., 11(8), 2010, R86, 10.1186/gb-2010-11-8-r86.
42. [42] Berthold, M.R., Cebron, N., Dill, F., Gabriel, T.R., Kötter, T., Meinl, T., Ohl, P., Thiel, K., Wiswedel, B., KNIME – the Konstanz information miner. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 11(1), 2009, 26, 10.1145/1656274.1656280.
43. [43] Demšar, J., Curk, T., Erjavec, A., Črt Gorup, Hočevar, T., Milutinovič, M., Mož ina, M., Polajnar, M., Toplak, M., Starič, A., Štajdohar, M., Umek, L., Žagar, L., Žbontar, J., Žitnik, M., Zupan, B., Orange: data mining toolbox in python. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 14 (2013), 2349–2353 http://jmlr.org/papers/v14/demsar13a.html.
44. [44] Guilloux, V., Arrault, A., Colliandre, L., Bourg, S., Vayer, P., Morin-Allory, L., Mining collections of compounds with Screening Assistant 2. J. Cheminform., 4(1), 2012, 20, 10.1186/1758-2946-4-20.
45. [45] Wolstencroft, K., Haines, R., Fellows, D., Williams, A., Withers, D., Owen, S., Soiland-Reyes, S., Dunlop, I., Nenadic, A., Fisher, P., Bhagat, J., Belhajjame, K., Bacall, F., Hardisty, A., de la Hidalga, A.N., Vargas, M.P.B., Sufi, S., Goble, C., The Taverna workflow suite: designing and executing workflows of Web Services on the desktop web or in the cloud. Nucleic Acids Res. 41:W1 (2013), W557–W561, 10.1093/nar/gkt328.
46. [46] Hall, M., Frank, E., Holmes, G., Pfahringer, B., Reutemann, P., Witten, I.H., The WEKA data mining software. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., 11(1), 2009, 10, 10.1145/1656274.1656278.
47. [47] O'Boyle, N.M., Vandermeersch, T., Flynn, C.J., Maguire, A.R., Hutchison, G.R., Confab – systematic generation of diverse low-energy conformers. J. Cheminform., 3(1), 2011, 8, 10.1186/1758-2946-3-8.
48. [48] Kochev, N.T., Paskaleva, V.H., Jeliazkova, N., Ambit-Tautomer: an open source tool for tautomer generation. Mol. Inf. 32:5–6 (2013), 481–504, 10.1002/minf.201200133.
49. [49] Beisken, S., Meinl, T., Wiswedel, B., de Figueiredo, L.F., Berthold, M., Steinbeck, C., KNIME-CDK: workflow-driven cheminformatics. BMC Bioinform., 14(1), 2013, 257, 10.1186/1471-2105-14-257.
50. [50] Kuhn, T., Willighagen, E.L., Zielesny, A., Steinbeck, C., CDK-Taverna: an open workflow environment for cheminformatics. BMC Bioinform., 11(1), 2010, 159, 10.1186/1471-2105-11-159.
51. [51] Krause, S., Willighagen, E., Steinbeck, C., JChemPaint – using the collaborative forces of the internet to develop a free editor for 2D chemical structures. Molecules 5:1 (2000), 93–98, 10.3390/50100093.
52. [52] Caboche, S., LeView: automatic and interactive generation of 2D diagrams for biomacromolecule/ligand interactions. J. Cheminform., 5(1), 2013, 40, 10.1186/1758-2946-5-40.
53. [53] Brefo-Mensah, E.K., Palmer, M., mol2chemfig a tool for rendering chemical structures from molfile or SMILES format to LATE X code. J. Cheminform., 4(1), 2012, 24, 10.1186/1758-2946-4-24.
54. [54] Hanwell, M.D., Curtis, D.E., Lonie, D.C., Vandermeersch, T., Zurek, E., Hutchison, G.R., Avogadro: an advanced semantic chemical editor visualization, and analysis platform. J. Cheminform., 4(1), 2012, 17, 10.1186/1758-2946-4-17.
55. [55] Moll, A., Hildebrandt, A., Lenhof, H.-P., Kohlbacher, O., BALLView: a tool for research and education in molecular modeling. Bioinformatics 22:3 (2005), 365–366, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bti818.
56. [56] Kovačević, G., Veryazov, V., Luscus: molecular viewer and editor for MOLCAS. J. Cheminform., 7(1), 2015, 10.1186/s13321-015-0060-z.
57. [57] Norrby, M., Grebner, C., Eriksson, J., Boström, J., Molecular rift: virtual reality for drug designers. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 55:11 (2015), 2475–2484, 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00544.
58. [58] Biasini, M., Schmidt, T., Bienert, S., Mariani, V., Studer, G., Haas, J., Johner, N., Schenk, A.D., Philippsen, A., Schwede, T., OpenStructure: an integrated software framework for computational structural biology. Acta Crystallogr. D Biol. Cryst. 69:5 (2013), 701–709, 10.1107/s0907444913007051.
59. [59] Salentin, S., Schreiber, S., Haupt, V.J., Adasme, M.F., Schroeder, M., PLIP: fully automated protein–ligand interaction profiler. Nucleic Acids Res. 43:W1 (2015), W443–W447, 10.1093/nar/gkv315.
60. [60] Sweeney, D.J., A Computational Tool for Biomolecular Structure Analysis Based on Chemical and Enzymatic Modification of Native Proteins (Ph.D. thesis). 2011, Wright State University.
61. [61] Tarini, M., Cignoni, P., Montani, C., Ambient occlusion and edge cueing for enhancing real time molecular visualization. IEEE Trans. Visual. Comput. Graphics 12:5 (2006), 1237–1244, 10.1109/tvcg.2006.115.
62. [62] Rego, N., Koes, D., 3Dmol.js: molecular visualization with WebGL. Bioinformatics 31:8 (2014), 1322–1324, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu829.
63. [63] Earley, C.W., CH5M3D: an HTML5 program for creating 3D molecular structures. J. Cheminform., 5(1), 2013, 46, 10.1186/1758-2946-5-46.
64. [64] Mohebifar, M., Sajadi, F., Chemozart: a web-based 3D molecular structure editor and visualizer platform. J. Cheminform., 7(1), 2015, 10.1186/s13321-015-0101-7.
65. [65] Burger, M.C., ChemDoodle Web Components: HTML5 toolkit for chemical graphics interfaces, and informatics. J. Cheminform., 7(1), 2015, 10.1186/s13321-015-0085-3.
66. [66] Bienfait, B., Ertl, P., JSME: a free molecule editor in JavaScript. J. Cheminform., 5(1), 2013, 24, 10.1186/1758-2946-5-24.
67. [67] Hanson, R.M., Jmol – a paradigm shift in crystallographic visualization. J. Appl. Cryst. 43:5 (2010), 1250–1260, 10.1107/s0021889810030256.
68. [68] Hanson, R.M., Prilusky, J., Renjian, Z., Nakane, T., Sussman, J.L., JSmol and the next-generation web-based representation of 3D molecular structure as applied to proteopedia. Israel J. Chem. 53:3–4 (2013), 207–216, 10.1002/ijch.201300024.
69. [69] Rose, A.S., Hildebrand, P.W., NGL Viewer: a web application for molecular visualization. Nucleic Acids Res. 43:W1 (2015), W576–W579, 10.1093/nar/gkv402.
70. [70] Biasini, M., pv: v1.8.1. 2015, 10.5281/zenodo.20980.
71. [71] Exploring QSAR. Anal. Chem., 67(17), 1995, 563A, 10.1021/ac00113a734.
72. [72] Jahn, A., Hinselmann, G., Fechner, N., Henneges, C., Zell, A., Probabilistic modeling of conformational space for 3D machine learning approaches. Mol. Inf., 29(5), 2010, 441–455, 10.1002/minf.201000036.
73. [73] Carbonell, P., Carlsson, L., Faulon, J.-L., Stereo signature molecular descriptor. J. Chem. Inform. Model., 53(4), 2013, 887–897, 10.1021/ci300584r.
74. [74] Yap, C.W., PaDEL-descriptor: an open source software to calculate molecular descriptors and fingerprints. J. Comput. Chem., 32(7), 2010, 1466–1474, 10.1002/jcc.21707.
75. [75] Melville, J.L., Hirst, J.D., TMACC: interpretable correlation descriptors for quantitative structure–activity relationships. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 47(2), 2007, 626–634, 10.1021/ci6004178.
76. [76] Stålring, J.C., Carlsson, L.A., Almeida, P., Boyer, S., AZOrange – high performance open source machine learning for QSAR modeling in a graphical programming environment. J. Cheminform., 3(1), 2011, 28, 10.1186/1758-2946-3-28.
77. [77] Cortes-Ciriano, I., Bioalerts: a python library for the derivation of structural alerts from bioactivity and toxicity data sets. J. Cheminform., 8(1), 2016, 10.1186/s13321-016-0125-7.
78. [78] Murrell, D.S., Cortes-Ciriano, I., van Westen, G.J.P., Stott, I.P., Bender, A., Malliavin, T.E., Glen, R.C., Chemically Aware Model Builder (camb): an R package for property and bioactivity modelling of small molecules. J. Cheminform., 7(1), 2015, 10.1186/s13321-015-0086-2.
79. [79] Carrió, P., López, O., Sanz, F., Pastor, M., eTOXlab an open source modeling framework for implementing predictive models in production environments. J. Cheminform., 7(1), 2015, 8, 10.1186/s13321-015-0058-6.
80. [80] Tosco, P., Balle, T., Open3DQSAR: a new open-source software aimed at high-throughput chemometric analysis of molecular interaction fields. J. Mol. Model., 17(1), 2010, 201–208, 10.1007/s00894-010-0684-x.
81. [81] Rydberg, P., Rostkowski, M., Gloriam, D.E., Olsen, L., The contribution of atom accessibility to site of metabolism models for cytochromes P450. Mol. Pharm., 10(4), 2013, 1216–1223, 10.1021/mp3005116.
82. [82] Patlewicz, G., Jeliazkova, N., Safford, R., Worth, A., Aleksiev, B., An evaluation of the implementation of the Cramer classification scheme in the Toxtree software. SAR QSAR Environ. Res., 19(5–6), 2008, 495–524, 10.1080/10629360802083871.
83. [83] Lusci, A., Pollastri, G., Baldi, P., Deep architectures and deep learning in chemoinformatics: the prediction of aqueous solubility for drug-like molecules. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 53(7), 2013, 1563–1575, 10.1021/ci400187y.
84. [84] Gütlein, M., Karwath, A., Kramer, S., CheS-Mapper 2.0 for visual validation of (Q)SAR models. J. Cheminform., 6(1), 2014, 10.1186/s13321-014-0041-7.
85. [85] Sander, T., Freyss, J., von Korff, M., Rufener, C., DataWarrior: an open-source program for chemistry aware data visualization and analysis. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 55(2), 2015, 460–473, 10.1021/ci500588j.
86. [86] Cereto-Massague, A., Guasch, L., Valls, C., Mulero, M., Pujadas, G., Garcia-Vallve, S., DecoyFinder: an easy-to-use python GUI application for building target-specific decoy sets. Bioinformatics, 28(12), 2012, 1661–1662, 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts249.
87. [87] Wetzel, S., Klein, K., Renner, S., Rauh, D., Oprea, T.I., Mutzel, P., Waldmann, H., Interactive exploration of chemical space with Scaffold Hunter. Nat. Chem. Biol., 5(8), 2009, 581–583, 10.1038/nchembio.187.
88. [88] Lewis, R., Guha, R., Korcsmaros, T., Bender, A., Synergy Maps: exploring compound combinations using network-based visualization. J. Cheminform., 7(1), 2015, 10.1186/s13321-015-0090-6.
89. [89] Martínez, M.J., Ponzoni, I., Díaz, M.F., Vazquez, G.E., Soto, A.J., Visual analytics in cheminformatics: user-supervised descriptor selection for QSAR methods. J. Cheminform., 7(1), 2015, 10.1186/s13321-015-0092-4.
90. [90] Ertl, P., Patiny, L., Sander, T., Rufener, C., Zasso, M., Wikipedia Chemical Structure Explorer: substructure and similarity searching of molecules from Wikipedia. J. Cheminform., 7(1), 2015, 10.1186/s13321-015-0061-y.
91. [91] Durrant, J.D., Votapka, L., Sørensen, J., Amaro, R.E., POVME 2.0: an enhanced tool for determining pocket shape and volume characteristics. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 10(11), 2014, 5047–5056, 10.1021/ct500381c.
92. [92] Rydberg, P., Gloriam, D.E., Zaretzki, J., Breneman, C., Olsen, L., SMARTCyp: a 2D method for prediction of cytochrome p450-mediated drug metabolism. ACS Med. Chem. Lett., 1(3), 2010, 96–100, 10.1021/ml100016x.
93. [93] Gütlein, M., Karwath, A., Kramer, S., CheS-Mapper – chemical space mapping and visualization in 3D. J. Cheminform., 4(1), 2012, 7, 10.1186/1758-2946-4-7.
94. [94] Vivo, M.D., Bridging quantum mechanics and structure-based drug design. Front. Biosci., 16(1), 2011, 1619, 10.2741/3809.
95. [95] Gonze, X., Amadon, B., Anglade, P.-M., Beuken, J.-M., Bottin, F., Boulanger, P., Bruneval, F., Caliste, D., Caracas, R., Côté, M., Deutsch, T., Genovese, L., Ghosez, P., Giantomassi, M., Goedecker, S., Hamann, D., Hermet, P., Jollet, F., Jomard, G., Leroux, S., Mancini, M., Mazevet, S., Oliveira, M., Onida, G., Pouillon, Y., Rangel, T., Rignanese, G.-M., Sangalli, D., Shaltaf, R., Torrent, M., Verstraete, M., Zerah, G., Zwanziger, J., ABINIT: first-principles approach to material and nanosystem properties. Comput. Phys. Commun., 180(12), 2009, 2582–2615, 10.1016/j.cpc.2009.07.007.
96. [96] Lotrich, V., Flocke, N., Ponton, M., Yau, A.D., Perera, A., Deumens, E., Bartlett, R.J., Parallel implementation of electronic structure energy gradient, and Hessian calculations. J. Chem. Phys., 128(19), 2008, 194104, 10.1063/1.2920482.
97. [97] Mohr, S., Ratcliff, L.E., Genovese, L., Caliste, D., Boulanger, P., Goedecker, S., Deutsch, T., Accurate and efficient linear scaling DFT calculations with universal applicability. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17(47), 2015, 31360–31370, 10.1039/c5cp00437c.
98. [98] Hutter, J., Iannuzzi, M., Schiffmann, F., VandeVondele, J., cp2k: atomistic simulations of condensed matter systems. Wiley Interdisc. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci., 4(1), 2013, 15–25, 10.1002/wcms.1159.
99. [99] Bahn, S., Jacobsen, K., An object-oriented scripting interface to a legacy electronic structure code. Comput. Sci. Eng., 4(3), 2002, 56–66, 10.1109/5992.998641.
100. [100] Rudberg, E., Rubensson, E.H., Sałek, P., Kohn-Sham density functional theory electronic structure calculations with linearly scaling computational time and memory usage. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 7(2), 2011, 340–350, 10.1021/ct100611z.
101. [101] Lehtola, J., Hakala, M., Sakko, A., Hämäläinen, K., ERKALE – a flexible program package for X-ray properties of atoms and molecules. J. Comput. Chem., 33(18), 2012, 1572–1585, 10.1002/jcc.22987.
102. [102] Enkovaara, J., Rostgaard, C., Mortensen, J.J., Chen, J., Dułak, M., Ferrighi, L., Gavnholt, J., Glinsvad, C., Haikola, V., Hansen, H.A., Kristoffersen, H.H., Kuisma, M., Larsen, A.H., Lehtovaara, L., Ljungberg, M., Lopez-Acevedo, O., Moses, P.G., Ojanen, J., Olsen, T., Petzold, V., Romero, N.A., Stausholm-Møller, J., Strange, M., Tritsaris, G.A., Vanin, M., Walter, M., Hammer, B., Häkkinen, H., Madsen, G.K.H., Nieminen, R.M., Nørskov, J.K., Puska, M., Rantala, T.T., Schiøtz, J., Thygesen, K.S., Jacobsen, K.W., Electronic structure calculations with GPAW: a real-space implementation of the projector augmented-wave method. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 22(25), 2010, 253202 http://stacks.iop.org/0953-8984/22/i=25/a=253202.
103. [103] Nikolaienko, T.Y., Bulavin, L.A., Hovorun, D.M., JANPA: an open source cross-platform implementation of the Natural Population Analysis on the Java platform. Comput. Theoret. Chem., 1050, 2014, 15–22, 10.1016/j.comptc.2014.10.002.
104. [104] Janssen, C., Seidl, E., Colvin, M., Object-oriented implementation of parallel ab initio programs. ACS Symposium Series, Parallel Computing in Computational Chemistry, vol. 592, 1995.
105. [105] Valiev, M., Bylaska, E., Govind, N., Kowalski, K., Straatsma, T., Dam, H.V., Wang, D., Nieplocha, J., Apra, E., Windus, T., de Jong, W., NWChem: a comprehensive and scalable open-source solution for large scale molecular simulations. Comput. Phys. Commun., 181(9), 2010, 1477–1489, 10.1016/j.cpc.2010.04.018.
106. [106] Andrade, X., Strubbe, D., Giovannini, U.D., Larsen, A.H., Oliveira, M.J.T., Alberdi-Rodriguez, J., Varas, A., Theophilou, I., Helbig, N., Verstraete, M.J., Stella, L., Nogueira, F., Aspuru-Guzik, A., Castro, A., Marques, M.A.L., Rubio, A., Real-space grids and the Octopus code as tools for the development of new simulation approaches for electronic systems. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 17(47), 2015, 31371–31396, 10.1039/c5cp00351b.
107. [107] Ozaki, T., Kino, H., Efficient projector expansion for the ab initio LCAO method. Phys. Rev. B, 72(4), 2005, 10.1103/physrevb.72.045121.
108. [108] Turney, J.M., Simmonett, A.C., Parrish, R.M., Hohenstein, E.G., Evangelista, F.A., Fermann, J.T., Mintz, B.J., Burns, L.A., Wilke, J.J., Abrams, M.L., Russ, N.J., Leininger, M.L., Janssen, C.L., Seidl, E.T., Allen, W.D., Schaefer, H.F., King, R.A., Valeev, E.F., Sherrill, C.D., Crawford, T.D., Psi4: an open-source ab initio electronic structure program. Wiley Interdisc. Rev. Comput. Mol. Sci., 2(4), 2011, 556–565, 10.1002/wcms.93.
109. [109] Kim, J., Esler, K., McMinis, J., Ceperley, D.M., Quantum monte carlo algorithms: making most of large-scale multi/many-core clusters. Conf. Ser. (Chattanooga, TN), Sci. Discov. Adv. Comput. (SciDac), J. Physics, 2010.
110. [110] Giannozzi, P., Baroni, S., Bonini, N., Calandra, M., Car, R., Cavazzoni, C., Ceresoli, D., Chiarotti, G.L., Cococcioni, M., Dabo, I., Corso, A.D., de Gironcoli, S., Fabris, S., Fratesi, G., Gebauer, R., Gerstmann, U., Gougoussis, C., Kokalj, A., Lazzeri, M., Martin-Samos, L., Marzari, N., Mauri, F., Mazzarello, R., Paolini, S., Pasquarello, A., Paulatto, L., Sbraccia, C., Scandolo, S., Sclauzero, G., Seitsonen, A.P., Smogunov, A., Umari, P., Wentzcovitch, R.M., QUANTUM ESPRESSO: a modular and open-source software project for quantum simulations of materials. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter, 21(39), 2009, 395502, 10.1088/0953-8984/21/39/395502.
111. [111] Moore, S., Briggs, E., Hodak, M., Lu, W., Bernholc, J., Lee, C.-W., Scaling the RMG quantum mechanics code. Proceedings of the Extreme Scaling Workshop, 2012, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, 8.
112. [112] Steinmann, C., Ibsen, M.W., Hansen, A.S., Jensen, J.H., FragIt: a tool to prepare input files for fragment based quantum chemical calculations. PLoS ONE, 7(9), 2012, e44480, 10.1371/journal.pone.0044480.
113. [113] O'boyle, N.M., Tenderholt, A.L., Langner, K.M., cclib. A library for package-independent computational chemistry algorithms. J. Comput. Chem, 29(5), 2008, 839–845, 10.1002/jcc.20823.
114. [114] Etienne, T., Assfeld, X., Monari, A., New insight into the topology of excited states through detachment/attachment density matrices-based centroids of charge. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 10(9), 2014, 3906–3914, 10.1021/ct500400s.
115. [115] Hermann, G., Pohl, V., Tremblay, J.C., Paulus, B., Hege, H.-C., Schild, A., ORBKIT-A Modular Python Toolbox for Cross-Platform Post-Processing of Quantum Chemical Wavefunction Data. 2016 arXiv:1601.03069.
116. [116] Allouche, A.-R., Gabedit – a graphical user interface for computational chemistry softwares. J. Comput. Chem., 32(1), 2010, 174–182, 10.1002/jcc.21600.
117. [117] Canepa, P., Hanson, R.M., Ugliengo, P., Alfredsson, M., J-ICE: a new Jmol interface for handling and visualizing crystallographic and electronic properties. J. Appl. Cryst., 44(1), 2010, 225–229, 10.1107/s0021889810049411.
118. [118] Bode, B.M., Gordon, M.S., Macmolplt: a graphical user interface for GAMESS. J. Mol. Graph. Modell., 16(3), 1998, 133–138, 10.1016/s1093-3263(99)00002-9.
119. [119] Genovese, L., Neelov, A., Goedecker, S., Deutsch, T., Ghasemi, S.A., Willand, A., Caliste, D., Zilberberg, O., Rayson, M., Bergman, A., Schneider, R., Daubechies wavelets as a basis set for density functional pseudopotential calculations. J. Chem. Phys., 129(1), 2008, 014109, 10.1063/1.2949547.
120. [120] Mohr, S., Ratcliff, L.E., Boulanger, P., Genovese, L., Caliste, D., Deutsch, T., Goedecker, S., Daubechies wavelets for linear scaling density functional theory. J. Chem. Phys., 140(20), 2014, 204110, 10.1063/1.4871876.
121. [121] Blöchl, P.E., Projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B, 50(24), 1994, 17953–17979 doi:10.1103/physrevb.50.17953. URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.50.17953.
122. [122] Kresse, G., Joubert, D., From ultrasoft pseudopotentials to the projector augmented-wave method. Phys. Rev. B, 59(3), 1999, 1758–1775, 10.1103/physrevb.59.1758.
123. [123] Marques, M.A., Oliveira, M.J., Burnus, T., Libxc: a library of exchange and correlation functionals for density functional theory. Comput. Phys. Commun., 183(10), 2012, 2272–2281, 10.1016/j.cpc.2012.05.007.
124. [124] Vitalis, A., Pappu, R.V., Methods for Monte Carlo simulations of biomacromolecules. Annu. Rep. Comput. Chem., 5, 2009, 49–76, 10.1016/S1574-1400(09)00503-9.
125. [125] Smith, W., Yong, C., Rodger, P., DL_POLY: application to molecular simulation. Mol. Simul., 28(5), 2002, 385–471, 10.1080/08927020290018769.
126. [126] Zhu, Y.-L., Liu, H., Li, Z.-W., Qian, H.-J., Milano, G., Lu, Z.-Y., GALAMOST: GPU-accelerated large-scale molecular simulation toolkit. J. Comput. Chem., 34(25), 2013, 2197–2211, 10.1002/jcc.23365.
127. [127] Pronk, S., Pall, S., Schulz, R., Larsson, P., Bjelkmar, P., Apostolov, R., Shirts, M.R., Smith, J.C., Kasson, P.M., van der Spoel, D., Hess, B., Lindahl, E., GROMACS 4.5: a high-throughput and highly parallel open source molecular simulation toolkit. Bioinformatics, 29(7), 2013, 845–854, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btt055.
128. [128] Lorenzen, K., Schwörer, M., Tröster, P., Mates, S., Tavan, P., Optimizing the accuracy and efficiency of fast hierarchical multipole expansions for MD simulations. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 8(10), 2012, 3628–3636, 10.1021/ct300080n.
129. [129] Plimpton, S., Fast parallel algorithms for short-range molecular dynamics. J. Comput. Phys., 117(1), 1995, 1–19, 10.1006/jcph.1995.1039.
130. [130] Lyubartsev, A.P., Laaksonen, A., M. DynaMix – a scalable portable parallel MD simulation package for arbitrary molecular mixtures. Comput. Phys. Commun., 128(3), 2000, 565–589, 10.1016/s0010-4655(99)00529-9.
131. [131] Hinsen, K., The molecular modeling toolkit: a new approach to molecular simulations. J. Comput. Chem., 21(2), 2000, 79–85, 10.1002/(sici)1096-987x(20000130)21:2<79::aid-jcc1>3.0.co;2-b.
132. [132] Eastman, P., Friedrichs, M.S., Chodera, J.D., Radmer, R.J., Bruns, C.M., Ku, J.P., Beauchamp, K.A., Lane, T.J., Wang, L.-P., Shukla, D., Tye, T., Houston, M., Stich, T., Klein, C., Shirts, M.R., Pande, V.S., OpenMM 4: a reusable extensible, hardware independent library for high performance molecular simulation. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 9(1), 2013, 461–469, 10.1021/ct300857j.
133. [133] Matthey, T., Cickovski, T., Hampton, S., Ko, A., Ma, Q., Nyerges, M., Raeder, T., Slabach, T., Izaguirre, J.A., ProtoMol an object-oriented framework for prototyping novel algorithms for molecular dynamics. ACM Trans. Math. Softw., 30(3), 2004, 237–265, 10.1145/1024074.1024075.
134. [134] Michel, J., Taylor, R.D., Essex, J.W., Efficient generalized Born models for Monte Carlo simulations. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 2(3), 2006, 732–739, 10.1021/ct600069r.
135. [135] Zwier, M.C., Adelman, J.L., Kaus, J.W., Pratt, A.J., Wong, K.F., Rego, N.B., Suárez, E., Lettieri, S., Wang, D.W., Grabe, M., Zuckerman, D.M., Chong, L.T., WESTPA: an interoperable highly scalable software package for weighted ensemble simulation and analysis. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 11(2), 2015, 800–809, 10.1021/ct5010615.
136. [136] Salomon-Ferrer, R., Case, D.A., Walker, R.C., An overview of the Amber biomolecular simulation package. Wiley Interdisc. Rev.: Comput. Mol. Sci., 3(2), 2012, 198–210, 10.1002/wcms.1121.
137. [137] Romo, T.D., Leioatts, N., Grossfield, A., Lightweight object oriented structure analysis: tools for building tools to analyze molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem., 35(32), 2014, 2305–2318, 10.1002/jcc.23753.
138. [138] Vanommeslaeghe, K., Yang, M.A.D.M. Jr., Robustness in the fitting of molecular mechanics parameters. J. Comput. Chem., 36(14), 2015, 1083–1101, 10.1002/jcc.23897.
139. [139] Michaud-Agrawal, N., Denning, E.J., Woolf, T.B., Beckstein, O., MDAnalysis: a toolkit for the analysis of molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem., 32(10), 2011, 2319–2327, 10.1002/jcc.21787.
140. [140] McGibbon, R.T., Beauchamp, K.A., Harrigan, M.P., Klein, C., Swails, J.M., Hernández, C.X., Schwantes, C.R., Wang, L.-P., Lane, T.J., Pande, V.S., MDTraj: a modern open library for the analysis of molecular dynamics trajectories. Biophys. J., 109(8), 2015, 1528–1532, 10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.015.
141. [141] Guixà-González, R., Rodriguez-Espigares, I., Ramírez-Anguita, J.M., Carrió-Gaspar, P., Martinez-Seara, H., Giorgino3, T., Selent, J., MEMBPLUGIN: studying membrane complexity in VMD. Bioinformatics, 30(10), 2014, 1478–1480, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btu037.
142. [142] Marcos-Alcalde, I., Setoain, J., Mendieta-Moreno, J.I., Mendieta, J., Gómez-Puertas, P., MEPSA: minimum energy pathway analysis for energy landscapes: Fig. 1. Bioinformatics, 2015, btv453, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btv453.
143. [143] Beauchamp, K.A., Bowman, G.R., Lane, T.J., Maibaum, L., Haque, I.S., Pande, V.S., MSMBuilder2: modeling conformational dynamics on the picosecond to millisecond scale. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 7(10), 2011, 3412–3419, 10.1021/ct200463m.
144. [144] Martínez, L., Andrade, R., Birgin, E.G., Martínez, J.M., PACKMOL: a package for building initial configurations for molecular dynamics simulations. J. Comput. Chem., 30(13), 2009, 2157–2164, 10.1002/jcc.21224.
145. [145] Dolinsky, T.J., Czodrowski, P., Li, H., Nielsen, J.E., Jensen, J.H., Klebe, G., Baker, N.A., PDB2PQR: expanding and upgrading automated preparation of biomolecular structures for molecular simulations. Nucleic Acids Res., 35(Web Server Issue), 2007, W522–W525, 10.1093/nar/gkm276.
146. [146] Tribello, G.A., Bonomi, M., Branduardi, D., Camilloni, C., Bussi, G., PLUMED 2: new feathers for an old bird. Comput. Phys. Commun., 185(2), 2014, 604–613, 10.1016/j.cpc.2013.09.018.
147. [147] Bakan, A., Meireles, L.M., Bahar, I., ProDy: protein dynamics inferred from theory and experiments. Bioinformatics, 27(11), 2011, 1575–1577, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr168.
148. [148] Yesylevskyy, S.O., Pteros 2.0: evolution of the fast parallel molecular analysis library for C++ and python. J. Comput. Chem., 36(19), 2015, 1480–1488, 10.1002/jcc.23943.
149. [149] Scherer, M.K., Trendelkamp-Schroer, B., Paul, F., Pérez-Hernández, G., Hoffmann, M., Plattner, N., Wehmeyer, C., Prinz, J.-H., Noé, F., PyEMMA 2: a software package for estimation validation, and analysis of Markov models. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 11(11), 2015, 5525–5542, 10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00743.
150. [150] Dupradeau, F.-Y., Pigache, A., Zaffran, T., Savineau, C., Lelong, R., Grivel, N., Lelong, D., Rosanskia, W., Cieplak, P., The R.E.D. tools: advances in RESP and ESP charge derivation and force field library building. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 12(28), 2010, 10.1039/c0cp00111b.
151. [151] Cickovski, T., Chatterjee, S., Wenger, J., Sweet, C.R., Izaguirre, J.A., MDLab: a molecular dynamics simulation prototyping environment. J. Comput. Chem., 2009, 10.1002/jcc.21418.
152. [152] Bakan, A., Nevins, N., Lakdawala, A.S., Bahar, I., Druggability assessment of allosteric proteins by dynamics simulations in the presence of probe molecules. J. Chem. Theory Comput., 8(7), 2012, 2435–2447, 10.1021/ct300117j.
153. [153] Berenger, F., Voet, A., Lee, X., Zhang, K.Y., A rotation-translation invariant molecular descriptor of partial charges and its use in ligand-based virtual screening. J. Cheminform., 6(1), 2014, 23, 10.1186/1758-2946-6-23.
154. [154] Haque, I.S., Pande, V.S., PAPER: accelerating parallel evaluations of ROCS. J. Comput. Chem., 31(1), 2010, 117–132, 10.1002/jcc.21307.
155. [155] Koes, D.R., Camacho, C.J., Pharmer: efficient and exact pharmacophore search. J. Chem. Inform. Model., 51(6), 2011, 1307–1314, 10.1021/ci200097m.
156. [156] Sunseri, J., Koes, D.R., Pharmit: interactive exploration of chemical space. Nucleic Acids Res., 2016, gkw287, 10.1093/nar/gkw287.
157. [157] Schreyer, A.M., Blundell, T., USRCAT: real-time ultrafast shape recognition with pharmacophoric constraints. J. Cheminform., 4(1), 2012, 27, 10.1186/1758-2946-4-27.
158. [158] Taminau, J., Thijs, G., Winter, H.D., Pharao: pharmacophore alignment and optimization. J. Mol. Graph. Modell., 27(2), 2008, 161–169, 10.1016/j.jmgm.2008.04.003.
159. [159] Baker, N.A., Sept, D., Joseph, S., Holst, M.J., McCammon, J.A., Electrostatics of nanosystems: Application to microtubules and the ribosome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 98(18), 2001, 10037–10041, 10.1073/pnas.181342398.
160. [160] Morris, G.M., Huey, R., Lindstrom, W., Sanner, M.F., Belew, R.K., Goodsell, D.S., Olson, A.J., AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J. Comput. Chem., 30(16), 2009, 2785–2791, 10.1002/jcc.21256.
161. [161] Trott, O., Olson, A.J., AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function efficient optimization, and multithreading. J. Comput. Chem., 2009, 10.1002/jcc.21334.
162. [162] Ballante, F., Marshall, G.R., An automated strategy for binding-pose selection and docking assessment in structure-based drug design. J. Chem. Inform. Model., 56(1), 2016, 54–72, 10.1021/acs.jcim.5b00603.
163. [163] Bullock, C., Cornia, N., Jacob, R., Remm, A., Peavey, T., Weekes, K., Mallory, C., Oxford, J.T., McDougal, O.M., Andersen, T.L., DockoMatic 2.0: high throughput inverse virtual screening and homology modeling. J. Chem. Inform. Model., 53(8), 2013, 2161–2170, 10.1021/ci400047w.
164. [164] Jiang, X., Kumar, K., Hu, X., Wallqvist, A., Reifman, J., DOVIS 2.0: an efficient and easy to use parallel virtual screening tool based on AutoDock 4.0. Chem. Central J., 2(1), 2008, 18, 10.1186/1752-153x-2-18.
165. [165] Li, H., Leung, K.-S., Wong, M.-H., idock. A multithreaded virtual screening tool for flexible ligand docking. 2012 IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology (CIBCB), 2012, Institute of Electrical & Electronics Engineers (IEEE), 10.1109/cibcb.2012.6217214.
166. [166] Abreu, R.M., Froufe, H.J., Queiroz, M., Ferreira, I.C., MOLA: a bootable self-configuring system for virtual screening using AutoDock4/Vina on computer clusters. J. Cheminform., 2(1), 2010, 10, 10.1186/1758-2946-2-10.
167. [167] Durrant, J.D., McCammon, J.A., NNScore 2.0: a neural-network receptor–ligand scoring function. J. Chem. Inform. Model., 51(11), 2011, 2897–2903, 10.1021/ci2003889.
168. [168] Meier, R., Pippel, M., Brandt, F., Sippl, W., Baldauf, C., ParaDockS: a framework for molecular docking with population-based metaheuristics. J. Chem. Inform. Model., 50(5), 2010, 879–889, 10.1021/ci900467x.
169. [169] Dallakyan, S., Olson, A.J., Small-molecule library screening by docking with PyRx. Methods in Molecular Biology, 2014, Springer Science + Business Media, 243–250, 10.1007/978-1-4939-2269-7_19.
170. [170] Ruiz-Carmona, S., Alvarez-Garcia, D., Foloppe, N., Garmendia-Doval, A.B., Juhos, S., Schmidtke, P., Barril, X., Hubbard, R.E., Morley, S.D., rDock: a fast versatile and open source program for docking ligands to proteins and nucleic acids. PLoS Comput. Biol., 10(4), 2014, e1003571, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003571.
171. [171] Li, H., Leung, K.-S., Wong, M.-H., Ballester, P.J., Improving AutoDock Vina using random forest: the growing accuracy of binding affinity prediction by the effective exploitation of larger data sets. Mol. Inf., 34(2–3), 2015, 115–126, 10.1002/minf.201400132.
172. [172] Koes, D.R., Baumgartner, M.P., Camacho, C.J., Lessons learned in empirical scoring with smina from the CSAR 2011 benchmarking exercise. J. Chem. Inform. Model., 53(8), 2013, 1893–1904, 10.1021/ci300604z.
173. [173] Cereto-Massagué, A., Ojeda, M., Joosten, R.P., Valls, C., Mulero, M., Salvado, M., Arola-Arnal, A., Arola, L., Garcia-Vallvé, S., Pujadas, G., The good the bad and the dubious: VHELIBS a validation helper for ligands and binding sites. J. Cheminform., 5(1), 2013, 36, 10.1186/1758-2946-5-36.
174. [174] Zhang, X., Wong, S.E., Lightstone, F.C., Message passing interface and multithreading hybrid for parallel molecular docking of large databases on petascale high performance computing machines. J. Comput. Chem., 34(11), 2013, 915–927, 10.1002/jcc.23214.
175. [175] Ellingson, S.R., Smith, J.C., Baudry, J., VinaMPI: facilitating multiple receptor high-throughput virtual docking on high-performance computers. J. Comput. Chem., 34(25), 2013, 2212–2221, 10.1002/jcc.23367.
176. [176] Zonta, N., Grimstead, I.J., Avis, N.J., Brancale, A., Accessible haptic technology for drug design applications. J. Mol. Model., 15(2), 2008, 193–196, 10.1007/s00894-008-0387-8.
177. [177] Brylinski, M., Feinstein, W.P., eFindSite: improved prediction of ligand binding sites in protein models using meta-threading machine learning and auxiliary ligands. J. Comput.-Aided Mol. Des., 27(6), 2013, 551–567, 10.1007/s10822-013-9663-5.
178. [178] Schmidtke, P., Bidon-Chanal, A., Luque, F.J., Barril, X., MDpocket: open-source cavity detection and characterization on molecular dynamics trajectories. Bioinformatics, 27(23), 2011, 3276–3285, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btr550.
179. [179] Oliveira, S.H., Ferraz, F.A., Honorato, R.V., Xavier-Neto, J., Sobreira, T.J., de Oliveira, P.S., KVFinder: steered identification of protein cavities as a PyMOL plugin. BMC Bioinform.s, 15(1), 2014, 197, 10.1186/1471-2105-15-197.
180. [180] Till, M.S., Ullmann, G.M., McVol – a program for calculating protein volumes and identifying cavities by a Monte Carlo algorithm. J. Mol. Model., 16(3), 2009, 419–429, 10.1007/s00894-009-0541-y.
181. [181] Weisel, M., Proschak, E., Schneider, G., PocketPicker: analysis of ligand binding-sites with shape descriptors. Chem. Central J., 1(1), 2007, 7, 10.1186/1752-153x-1-7.
182. [182] Huey, R., Morris, G.M., Olson, A.J., Goodsell, D.S., A semiempirical free energy force field with charge-based desolvation. J. Comput. Chem., 28(6), 2007, 1145–1152, 10.1002/jcc.20634.
183. [183] Ballester, P.J., Mitchell, J.B.O., A machine learning approach to predicting protein–ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking. Bioinformatics, 26(9), 2010, 1169–1175, 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq112.
184. [184] Durrant, J.D., McCammon, J.A., AutoClickChem: click chemistry in silico. PLoS Comput. Biol., 8(3), 2012, e1002397, 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002397.
185. [185] Durrant, J.D., Lindert, S., McCammon, J.A., AutoGrow 3.0: an improved algorithm for chemically tractable semi-automated protein inhibitor design. J. Mol. Graph. Modell., 44, 2013, 104–112, 10.1016/j.jmgm.2013.05.006.
186. [186] Chéron, N., Jasty, N., Shakhnovich, E.I., OpenGrowth: an automated and rational algorithm for finding new protein ligands. J. Med. Chem., 2015, 10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b00886 150923135558008.
187. [187] Guha, R., Howard, M.T., Hutchison, G.R., Murray-Rust, P., Rzepa, H., Steinbeck, C., Wegner, J., Willighagen, E.L., The Blue Obelisk – interoperability in chemical informatics. J. Chem. Inform. Model., 46(3), 2006, 991–998, 10.1021/ci050400b.
188. [188] O'Boyle, N.M., Guha, R., Willighagen, E.L., Adams, S.E., Alvarsson, J., Bradley, J.-C., Filippov, I.V., Hanson, R.M., Hanwell, M.D., Hutchison, G.R., James, C.A., Jeliazkova, N., Lang, A.S., Langner, K.M., Lonie, D.C., Lowe, D.M., Pansanel, J., Pavlov, D., Spjuth, O., Steinbeck, C., Tenderholt, A.L., Theisen, K.J., Murray-Rust, P., Open data open source and open standards in chemistry: the Blue Obelisk five years on. J. Cheminform., 3(1), 2011, 37, 10.1186/1758-2946-3-37.