Open Drug Discovery Toolkit (ODDT): A new open-source player in the drug discovery field

Journal of Cheminformatics

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Wójcikowski, Maciej ^a   Zielenkiewicz, Piotr ^a,b   Siedlecki, Pawel ^a,b  

^a INSTITUTE OF BIOCHEMISTRY AND BIOPHYSICS   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

Author keywords

Machine learning; Programming; Receptor ligand interactions; Scoring function; Statistical methods; Toolkit; Virtual screening

Indexed keywords

EID: 84932194253     PISSN: None     EISSN: 17582946     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13321-015-0078-2     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Vogt M, Bajorath J (2012) Chemoinformatics: a view of the field and current trends in method development. Bioorg Med Chem 20:5317-5323
2. Duffy BC, Zhu L, Decornez H, Kitchen DB (2012) Early phase drug discovery: cheminformatics and computational techniques in identifying lead series. Bioorg Med Chem 20:5324-5342
3. O'Boyle NM, Banck M, James CA, Morley C, Vandermeersch T, Hutchison GR (2011) Open Babel: an open chemical toolbox. J Cheminform 3:33
4. RDKit: Cheminformatics and Machine Learning Software (2013). http://www.rdkit.org. Accessed 31 Nov 2014
5. OpenEye Scientific Software, Santa Fe, NM, USA. http://www.eyesopen.com. Accessed 31 Nov 2014
6. Jain AN (2006) Scoring functions for protein-ligand docking. Curr Protein Pept Sci 7:407-420
7. Cheng T, Li X, Li Y, Liu Z, Wang R (2009) Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set. J Chem Inf Model 49:1079-1093
8. Durrant JD, McCammon JA (2011) NNScore 2.0: a neural-network receptor-ligand scoring function. J Chem Inf Model 51:2897-2903
9. Ballester PJ, Mitchell JBO (2010) A machine learning approach to predicting protein-ligand binding affinity with applications to molecular docking. Bioinf Oxf Engl 26:1169-1175
10. Zilian D, Sotriffer CA (2013) SFCscore(RF): a random forest-based scoring function for improved affinity prediction of protein-ligand complexes. J Chem Inf Model 53:1923-1933
11. Cabrera ÁC, Gil-Redondo R, Perona A, Gago F, Morreale A (2011) VSDMIP 1.5: an automated structure- and ligand-based virtual screening platform with a PyMOL graphical user interface. J Comput Aided Mol Des 25:813-824
12. Wójcikowski M, Zielenkiewicz P, Siedlecki P (2014) DiSCuS: an open platform for (not only) virtual screening results management. J Chem Inf Model 54:347-354
13. O'Boyle NM, Hutchison GR (2008) Cinfony-combining Open Source cheminformatics toolkits behind a common interface. Chem Cent J 2:24
14. van der Walt S, Colbert SC, Varoquaux G (2011) The NumPy Array: a structure for efficient numerical computation. Comput Sci Eng 13:22-30
15. Lipinski CA (2004) Lead- and drug-like compounds: the rule-of-five revolution. Drug Discov Today Technol 1:337-341
16. Congreve M, Carr R, Murray C, Jhoti H (2003) A "rule of three" for fragment-based lead discovery? Drug Discov Today 8:876-877
17. Baell JB, Holloway GA (2010) New substructure filters for removal of pan assay interference compounds (PAINS) from screening libraries and for their exclusion in bioassays. J Med Chem 53:2719-2740
18. Morris GM, Huey R, Lindstrom W, Sanner MF, Belew RK, Goodsell DS et al (2009) AutoDock4 and AutoDockTools4: automated docking with selective receptor flexibility. J Comput Chem 30:2785-2791
19. Trott O, Olson AJ (2010) AutoDock Vina: improving the speed and accuracy of docking with a new scoring function, efficient optimization, and multithreading. J Comput Chem 31:455-461
20. Jones G, Willett P, Glen RC (1995) Molecular recognition of receptor sites using a genetic algorithm with a description of desolvation. J Mol Biol 245:43-53
21. Wojciechowski M (2007) FFNET: feed-forward neural network for Python. Tech Univ Lodz Pol Lodz Pol
22. Pedregosa F, Varoquaux G, Gramfort A, Michel V, Thirion B, Grisel O et al (2011) Scikit-learn: machine learning in Python. J Mach Learn Res 12:2825-2830
23. Cramer RD, Patterson DE, Bunce JD (1988) Comparative molecular field analysis (CoMFA). 1. Effect of shape on binding of steroids to carrier proteins. J Am Chem Soc 110:5959-5967
24. Schneider G, Downs G (2003) Editorial: machine learning methods in QSAR modelling. QSAR Comb Sci 22:485-486
25. Niu B, Lu W, Yang S, Cai Y, Li G (2007) Support vector machine for SAR/QSAR of phenethyl-amines. Acta Pharmacol Sin 28:1075-1086
26. Liu Z, Li Y, Han L, Li J, Liu J, Zhao Z, Nie W, Liu Y, Wang R (2015) PDB-wide collection of binding data: current status of the PDBbind database. Bioinformatics 31:405-412