Accessible haptic technology for drug design applications

Journal of Molecular Modeling

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 193-196

  Zonta, Nicola ^a   Grimstead, Ian J ^b   Avis, Nick J ^b   Brancale, Andrea ^a  

^a CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

De novo; Drug design; Haptic; Lead optimization; ZODIAC

Indexed keywords

COLCHICINE;

ARTICLE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER SIMULATION; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DATA ANALYSIS SOFTWARE; DRUG DESIGN; HAPTIC TECHNOLOGY; LIGAND BINDING; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; PROCESS TECHNOLOGY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

COLCHICINE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DRUG DESIGN; LIGANDS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; SOFTWARE; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP;

EID: 58549090307     PISSN: 16102940     EISSN: 09485023     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00894-008-0387-8     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Irwin JJ, Shoichet BK (2005) ZINC - a free Database of Commercially Available Compounds for Virtual Screening. J Chem Inf Model 45:177-182. doi: 10.1021/ci049714+
2. Kitchen DB, Decornez H, Furr JR et al (2004) Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: Methods and applications. Nat Rev Drug Discov 3:935-949. doi: 10.1038/nrd1549
3. Kontoyianni M, Madhav P, Suchanek E et al (2008) Theoretical and practical considerations in virtual screening: A beaten field? Curr Med Chem 2:107-116. doi: 10.2174/092986708783330566
4. Evans EA Rapid prototyping and industrial design practice: Can haptic feedback modeling provide the missing tactile link? Rapid Prototyping J 11:153-159. doi: 10.1108/13552540510601273
5. Vidal FP, Chalmers N, Gould DA et al (2005) Developing a needle guidance virtual environment with patient specific data and force feedback. Proceeding of the 19th International Congress of CARS - International Congress Series 1281:418-423
6. Laycock SD, Day AM (2007) A survey of haptic rendering techniques. Comput Graph Forum 26:50-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8659.2007.00945.x
7. Ouh-Young M, Pique M, Hughes J et al (1988) Using a manipulator for force display in molecular docking. Proc IEEE Robot Autom Conf 3:1824-1829
8. Meyer EF, Swanson SM, Williams JA (2000) Molecular modeling and drug design. Pharmacol Ther 85:113-121. doi: 10.1016/S0163-7258(99)00069-8
9. Nagata H, Mizushima H, Tanaka H (2002) Concept and prototype of protein-ligand docking simulator with force feedback technology. Bioinformatics 18:140-146. doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/18.1.140
10. Daunay B, Micaelli A, Regnier S (2007) 6 DOF haptic feedback for molecular docking using wave variables. IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation 840-845.
11. Persson PB, Cooper MD Tibell L et al (2007) Designing and evaluating a haptic system for biomolecular Education. IEEE Virtual Reality Conference 171-178
12. Wollacott AM, Mertz KM (2007) Haptic applications for molecular structure manipulation. J Mol Graph Model 25:801-805. doi: 10.1016/ j.jmgm.2006.07.005
13. Halgren T (1995) Merk Molecular Force Field I Basis Form ScopeParameterization and Performance of MMFF94. J Comp Chem 17:490-519
14. Halgren T (1995) Merk Molecular Force Field II MMFF94 van der Waals and Electrostatic Parameters for Intermolecular Interactions. J Comp Chem 17:520-552
15. Halgren T (1995) Merk Molecular Force Field III Molecular Geometries and Vibrational Frequencies for MMFF94. J Comp Chem 17:553-586
16. Halgren T (1995) Merk Molecular Force Field IV Conformational Energies and Geometries for MMFF94. J Comp Chem 17:587-615
17. Halgren T (1995) Merk Molecular Force Field V Extension of MMFF94. Using Experimental Data Additional Computational Data and Empirical Rules. J Comput Chem 17:616-641. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1096-987X(199604)17:5/ 6<616::AID-JCC5>3.0.CO;2-X
18. Calculations were performed using a Viglen Genie with a dual core Intel Xeon E5335 processor with 2Gb of RAM running Windows XP professional
19. ZODIAC 05b - http://www.zeden.org
20. Rajarshi G, Michael TH, Geoffrey R et al (2006) The Blue Obelisk - Interoperability in Chemical Informatics. J Chem Inf Model 46:991-998. doi: 10.1021/ci050400b
21. Novint FALCON - http://home.novint.com
22. SensAble Technologies, Inc. - http://www.sensable.com/
23. De Martino G, La Regina G, Coluccia A et al (2004) Arylthioindoles Potent Inhibitors of Tubulin Polymerization. J Med Chem 47:6120-6123. doi: 10.1021/jm049360d
24. De Martino G, Edler MC, La Regina G et al (2006) New Arythioindoles Potent Inhibitors of Tubulin Polymerization 2 Structure Activity Relationship and Molecular Modeling Studies. J Med Chem 49:947-954. doi: 10.1021/jm050809s
25. Romagnoli R, Baraldi PG, Carrion MD et al (2007) Synthesis and Biological Evaluation of 2-and 3-Amino Benzo[b]Thiophene Derivatives as Antimitotic Agents and Inhibitors of Tubulin Polymerization. J Med Chem 50:2865-2874. doi: 10.1021/jm061479u
26. Brancale A, Silvestri R (2007) Indole a core nucleus for potent inhibitors of tubulin polymerization. Med Res Rev 27:209-238. doi: 10.1002/med.20080
27. Wang R, Gao Y, Lai L (2000) LigBuilder: A Multi-Purpose Program for Structure-based Drug Design. J Mol Model 6:498-516. doi: 10.1007/ s0089400060498
28. Schneider G, Fechner U (2005) Computer-based de novo design of drug-like molecules. Nat Rev Drug Discov 4:649-663. doi: 10.1038/nrd1799
29. Honma T (2003) Recent advances in de novo design strategy for practical lead identification. Med Res Rev 23:606-632. doi: 10.1002/med.10046
30. Demonstration videos of ZODIAC can be found here: http://zodiac.phrm.cf.ac.uk/node/3