Efficient Production of Gene-Modified Mice using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9

Scientific Reports

Volumn 6, Issue , 2016, Pages

  Zhang, Xiya ^a,b   Liang, Puping ^a,b,c   Ding, Chenhui ^c   Zhang, Zhen ^b   Zhou, Jianwen ^c   Xie, Xiaowei ^b   Huang, Rui ^b   Sun, Ying ^b   Sun, Hongwei ^b   Zhang, Jinran ^b   Xu, Yanwen ^c   Songyang, Zhou ^a,b,c   Huang, Junjiu ^a,b,c  

^a SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Key Laboratory of Gene Engineering   (China)

^c SUN YAT SEN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GUIDE RNA;

ANIMAL; C57BL MOUSE; CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; DNA REPAIR; FOUNDER EFFECT; GENE KNOCK-IN; GENE TARGETING; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GENETICS; MAMMALIAN EMBRYO; METABOLISM; MOSAICISM; MUTANT MOUSE STRAIN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PROCEDURES; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS; TRANSGENIC MOUSE;

ANIMALS; BASE SEQUENCE; CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS; DNA REPAIR; EMBRYO, MAMMALIAN; FOUNDER EFFECT; GENE KNOCK-IN TECHNIQUES; GENE TARGETING; GENETIC ENGINEERING; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, MUTANT STRAINS; MICE, TRANSGENIC; MOSAICISM; RNA, GUIDE; STAPHYLOCOCCUS AUREUS;

EID: 84986212984     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20452322     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/srep32565     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Capecchi, M. R. Gene targeting in mice: functional analysis of the mammalian genome for the twenty-first century. Nat Rev Genet 6, 507-512 (2005).
2. Gaj, T., Gersbach, C. A. & Barbas, C. F. 3rd ZFN, TALEN, CRISPR/Cas-based methods for genome engineering. Trends Biotechnol 31, 397-405 (2013).
3. Kim, H. & Kim, J. S. A guide to genome engineering with programmable nucleases. Nat Rev Genet 15, 321-334 (2014).
4. Hai, T., Teng, F., Guo, R., Li, W. & Zhou, Q. One-step generation of knockout pigs by zygote injection of CRISPR/Cas system. Cell Res 24, 372-375 (2014).
5. Carlson, D. F. et al. Efficient TALEN-mediated gene knockout in livestock. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 109, 17382-17387 (2012).
6. Wang, H. et al. One-step generation of mice carrying mutations in multiple genes by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 153, 910-918 (2013).
7. Yang, H. et al. One-step generation of mice carrying reporter and conditional alleles by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome engineering. Cell 154, 1370-1379 (2013).
8. Meyer, M., de Angelis, M. H., Wurst, W. & Kuhn, R. Gene targeting by homologous recombination in mouse zygotes mediated by zinc-finger nucleases. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107, 15022-15026 (2010).
9. Qiu, Z. et al. High-efficiency and heritable gene targeting in mouse by transcription activator-like effector nucleases. Nucleic Acids Res 41, e120 (2013).
10. Niu, Y. et al. Generation of gene-modified cynomolgus monkey via Cas9/RNA-mediated gene targeting in one-cell embryos. Cell 156, 836-843 (2014).
11. Ma, Y. et al. Generating rats with conditional alleles using CRISPR/Cas9. Cell Res 24, 122-125 (2014).
12. Long, C. et al. Prevention of muscular dystrophy in mice by CRISPR/Cas9-mediated editing of germline DNA. Science (2014).
13. Sander, J. D. & Joung, J. K. CRISPR-Cas systems for editing, regulating and targeting genomes. Nat Biotechnol 32, 347-355 (2014).
14. Jinek, M. et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 337, 816-821 (2012).
15. Marraffini, L. A. & Sontheimer, E. J. CRISPR interference: RNA-directed adaptive immunity in bacteria and archaea. Nat Rev Genet 11, 181-190 (2010).
16. Horvath, P. & Barrangou, R. CRISPR/Cas, the immune system of bacteria and archaea. Science 327, 167-170 (2010).
17. Mali, P. et al. RNA-guided human genome engineering via Cas9. Science 339, 823-826 (2013).
18. Jinek, M. et al. RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells. eLife 2, e00471 (2013).
19. Cong, L. et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 339, 819-823 (2013).
20. Li, D. et al. Heritable gene targeting in the mouse and rat using a CRISPR-Cas system. Nat Biotechnol 31, 681-683 (2013).
21. Hwang, W. Y. et al. Heritable and precise zebrafish genome editing using a CRISPR-Cas system. PLoS One 8, e68708 (2013).
22. Li, W., Teng, F., Li, T. & Zhou, Q. Simultaneous generation and germline transmission of multiple gene mutations in rat using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat Biotechnol 31, 684-686 (2013).
23. Chen, Y. et al. Functional disruption of the dystrophin gene in rhesus monkey using CRISPR/Cas9. Hum Mol Genet 24, 3764-3774 (2015).
24. Kang, Y. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated Dax1 knockout in the monkey recapitulates human AHC-HH. Human molecular genetics 24, 7255-7264 (2015).
25. Zetsche, B. et al. Cpf1 Is a Single RNA-Guided Endonuclease of a Class 2 CRISPR-Cas System. Cell 163, 759-771 (2015).
26. Hou, Z. et al. Efficient genome engineering in human pluripotent stem cells using Cas9 from Neisseria meningitidis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110, 15644-15649 (2013).
27. Chen, Y. et al. Functional disruption of the dystrophin gene in Rhesus Monkey Using CRISPR/Cas9. Hum Mol Genet (2015).
28. Nishimasu, H. et al. Crystal Structure of Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Cell 162, 1113-1126 (2015).
29. Ran, F. A. et al. In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature 520, 186-191 (2015).
30. Miller, L. G. et al. Staphylococcus aureus skin infection recurrences among household members: an examination of host, behavioral, pathogen-level predictors. Clin Infect Dis 60, 753-763 (2015).
31. Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. Broadening the targeting range of Staphylococcus aureus CRISPR-Cas9 by modifying PAM recognition. Nat Biotechnol (2015).
32. Yen, S. T. et al. Somatic mosaicism and allele complexity induced by CRISPR/Cas9 RNA injections in mouse zygotes. Dev Biol 393, 3-9 (2014).
33. Friedland, A. E. et al. Characterization of Staphylococcus aureus Cas9: a smaller Cas9 for all-in-one adeno-associated virus delivery and paired nickase applications. Genome Biol 16, 257 (2015).
34. Singh, P., Schimenti, J. C. & Bolcun-Filas, E. A mouse geneticist's practical guide to CRISPR applications. Genetics 199, 1-15 (2015).
35. Wan, H. et al. One-step generation of p53 gene biallelic mutant Cynomolgus monkey via the CRISPR/Cas system. Cell Res 25, 258-261 (2015).
36. Kang, X. et al. Introducing precise genetic modifications into human 3PN embryos by CRISPR/Cas-mediated genome editing. J Assist Reprod Genet (2016).
37. Liang, P. et al. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated gene editing in human tripronuclear zygotes. Protein & cell 6, 363-372 (2015).
38. Callaway, E. UK scientists gain licence to edit genes in human embryos. Nature 530, 18 (2016).
39. Hilton, I. B. et al. Epigenome editing by a CRISPR-Cas9-based acetyltransferase activates genes from promoters and enhancers. Nat Biotechnol 33, 510-517 (2015).
40. Cheng, A. W. et al. Multiplexed activation of endogenous genes by CRISPR-on, an RNA-guided transcriptional activator system. Cell Res 23, 1163-1171 (2013).
41. Gilbert, L. A. et al. CRISPR-mediated modular RNA-guided regulation of transcription in eukaryotes. Cell 154, 442-451 (2013).
42. Vojta, A. et al. Repurposing the CRISPR-Cas9 system for targeted DNA methylation. Nucleic Acids Res (2016).
43. Slaymaker, I. M. et al. Rationally engineered Cas9 nucleases with improved specificity. Science (2015).
44. Ran, F. A. et al. Double nicking by RNA-guided CRISPR Cas9 for enhanced genome editing specificity. Cell 154, 1380-1389 (2013).
45. Shen, B. et al. Generation of gene-modified mice via Cas9/RNA-mediated gene targeting. Cell Res 23, 720-723 (2013).
46. Kleinstiver, B. P. et al. High-fidelity CRISPR-Cas9 nucleases with no detectable genome-wide off-target effects. Nature (2016).