Experimental approaches to studying the evolution of animal form: The shape of things to come

Experimental Evolution: Concepts, Methods, and Applications of Selection Experiments

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 419-478

  Frankino, W Anthony ^a   Emlen, Douglas J ^b   Shingleton, Alexander W ^c  

^a University of Houston   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

^c MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84985875504     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (283)

1. Adams, D. C., and M. S. Rosenberg. 1998. Partial warps, phylogeny, and ontogeny: A comment on Fink and Zelditch. Systematic Biology 47:168-173.
2. Allen, C. E., P. Beldade, B. J. Zwaan, and P. M. Brakefield. 2008. Differences in the selection response of serially repeated color pattern characters: standing variation, development, and evolution. BMC Evolutionary Biology 8:94.
3. Andersson, M. 1982. Female choice selects for extreme tail length in a widowbird. Nature 299:818-820.
4. Arevalo, J. E., and P. Heeb. 2005. Ontogeny of sexual dimorphism in the long-tailed manakin Chiroxiphia linearis: Long maturation of display trait morphology. Ibis 147:697-705.
5. Arnold, S. J. 1983. Morphology, performance and fitness. American Zoologist 23:347-361.
6. Arnold, S. J., and P. C. Phillips. 1999. Hierarchical comparison of genetic variancecovariance matrices II: Costal-inland divergence in the garter snake, Thamnophis elegans. Evolution 53:1516-1527.
7. Atchley, W. R., D. E. Cowley, C. Vogl, and T. McLellan. 1992. Evolutionary divergence, shape change, and genetic correlation structure in the rodent mandible. Systematic Biology 41:196-221.
8. Atchley, W. R., and B. K. Hall. 1991. A model for development and evolution of complex morphological structures. Biological Reviews 66:101-157.
9. Atchley, W. R., and J. J. Rutledge. 1980. Genetic components of size and shape. I. Dynamics of components of phenotypic variability and covariability during ontogeny in the laboratory rat. Evolution 34:1161-1173.
10. Atchley, W. R., J. J. Rutledge, and D. E. Crowley. 1981. Genetic components of size and shape. II. Multivariate covariance patterns in the rat and mouse skull. Evolution 35:1037-1055.
11. Atchley, W. R., S. Xu, and C. Vogl. 1994. Developmental quantitative genetic models of evolutionary change. Developmental Genetics 15:92-103.
12. Azevedo, R. B. R., A. C. James, J. McCabe, and L. Partridge. 1998. Latitudinal variation of wing:thorax size ratio and wing-aspect ratio in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 52: 1353-1362.
13. Badyaev, A. V., and K. R. Foresman. 2000. Extreme environmental change and evolution: Stress-induced morphological variation is strongly concordant with patterns of evolutionary divergence in shrew mandibles. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 267:371-377.
14. Baker, R. H., and G. S. Wilkinson. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of sexual dimorphism and eyespan allometry in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Evolution 55:1373-1385.
15. Baker, R. H., and G. S. Wilkinson. 2003. Phylogenetic analysis of correlation structure in stalk-eyed flies (Diasemopsis, Diopsidae). Evolution 57:87-103.
16. Barker, J. S. F., and R. A. Krebs. 1995. Genetic variation and plasticity of thorax length and wing length in Drosophila aldrichi and D. buzzatii. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 8:689-709.
17. Beldade, P., and P. M. Brakefield. 2003. The difficulty of agreeing about constraints. Evolution and Development 5:119-120.
18. Beldade, P., P. M. Brakefield, and A. D. Long. 2002. Contribution of Distal-less to quantitative variation in butterfly eyespots. Nature 415:315-318.
19. Beldade, P., K. Koops, and P. M. Brakefield. 2002. Developmental constraints versus flexibility in morphological evolution. Nature 416:844-847.
20. Beldade, P., K. Koops, and P. M. Brakefield. 2005. Generating phenotypic variation: Prospects from "evo-devo" research on Bicyclus anynana wing patterns. Evolution and Development 7:101-107.
21. Bertin, A., and D. J. Fairbairn. 2007. The form of sexual selection on male genitalia cannot be inferred from within-population variance and allometry: A case study in Aquarius remigis. Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution 61:825-837.
22. Bier, E. 2000. Drawing lines in the Drosophila wing: Initiation of wing vein development. Current Opinion in Genetics & Development 10:393-398.
23. Birdsall, K., E. Zimmerman, K. Teeter, and G. Gibson. 2000. Genetic variation for the positioning of wing veins in Drosophilia melanogaster. Evolution and Development 2:16-24.
24. Blackstone, N. W. 1987. Allometry and relative growth: Pattern and process in evolutionary studies. Systematic Zoology 36:76-78.
25. Blomberg, S. P., and T. Garland, Jr. 2002. Tempo and mode in evolution: Phylogenetic inertia, adaptation, and comparative methods. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15:899-910.
26. Blomberg, S. P., T. Garland, Jr., and A. R. Ives. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: Behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:717-745.
27. Boag, P. T., and P. R. Grant. 1981. Intense natural selection in a population of Darwin's finches (Geospizinae) in the Galapagos. Science 214:82-85.
28. Bookstein, F. L. 1997 Morphometric Tools for Landmark Data: Geometry and Biology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Bonduriansky, R. 2007a. The evolution of condition-dependent sexual dimorphism. American Naturalist 169:9-19.
30. Bonduriansky, R. 2007b. Sexual selection and allometry: A critical reappraisal of the evidence and ideas. Evolution 61:838-849.
31. Bonduriansky, R., and T. Day. 2003. The evolution of static allometry in sexually selected traits. Evolution: International Journal of Organic Evolution 57:2450-2458.
32. Brakefield, P. M. 2003. The power of evo-devo to explore evolutionary constraints: Experiments with butterfly eyespots. Zoology 106:283-290.
33. Brakefield, P. M., and W. A. Frankino. 2009. Polyphenisms in Lepidoptera: Multidisciplinary approaches to studies of evolution and development. In T. N. Ananthakrishnan and D. W. Whitman, eds. Phenotypic Plasticity in Insects: Mechanisms and Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Brakefield, P. M., J. Gates, D. Keys, F. Kesbeke, P. J. Wijngaarden, A. Monteiro, V. French, et al. 1996. Development, plasticity and evolution of butterfly eyespot patterns. Nature 384:236-242.
35. Brakefield, P. M., and T. B. Larsen. 1984. The evolutionary significance of dry and wet season forms in some tropical butterflies. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 22:1-12.
36. Breuker, C. J., J. S. Patterson, and C. P. Klingenberg. 2006. A single basis for developing buffering of Drosophila wing shape. PLoS One 1:1-7.
37. Burkhardt, D., and I. de la Motte. 1983. How stalk-eyed flies eye stalk-eyed flies: Observations and measurements of the eyes of Cyrtodiopsis whitei (Diopsidae, Diptera). Journal of Comparative Physiology 151:407-421.
38. Burkhardt, D., and I. de la Motte. 1985. Selective pressures, variability, and sexual dimorphism in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Naturwissenschaften 72:204-206.
39. Burkhardt, D., and I. de la Motte. 1987. Physiological, behavioral, and morphometric data elucidate the evolutive significance of stalked eyes in Diopsidae (Diptera). Entomologia Generalis 12:221-233.
40. Calder, W. A. 1984. Size, Function and Life History. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
41. Camara, M. D., C. A. Ancell, and M. Pigliucci. 2000. Induced mutations: A novel tool to study phenotypic integration and evolutionary constraints in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evolutionary Ecology Research 2:1009-1029.
42. Carroll, S. B., J. Gates, D. N. Keys, S. W. Paddock, G. E. F. Panganiban, J. E. Selegue, and J. Williams. 1994. Pattern formation and eyespot determination in butterfly wings. Science 265:109-114.
43. Carroll, S. B., J. K. Grenier, and S. D. Weatherbee. 2001. From DNA to Diversity: Molecular Genetics and the Evolution of Animal Design. Malden, MA: Blackwell Science.
44. Cheverud, J. M. 1982a. Phenotypic, genetic, and environmental morphological integration in the cranium. Evolution 36:499-516.
45. Cheverud, J. M. 1982b. Relationships among ontogenetic, static, and evolutionary allometry. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 59:139-149.
46. Cheverud, J. M. 1984. Quantitative genetics and developmental constraints on evolution by selection. Journal of Theoretical Biology 110:155-171.
47. Cheverud, J. M. 1988. The evolution of genetic correlation and developmental constraints. Pages 94-101 in G. de Jong, ed. Population Genetics and Evolution. Berlin: Springer.
48. Cheverud, J. M. 1996. Developmental integration and the evolution of pleiotropy. American Zoologist 36:44-50.
49. Cheverud, J. M., and E. J. Routman. 1995. Epistasis and its contribution to genetic variance components. Genetics 139.
50. Cheverud, J. M., E. J. Routman, and E. J. Irschick. 1997. Pleiotropic effects of individual gene loci on mandibular morphology. Evolution 51:2006-2016.
51. Cheverud, J. M., J. J. Rutledge, and W. R. Atchley. 1983. Quantitative genetics of development: Genetic correlations among age-specific trait values and the evolution of ontogeny. Evolution 37:895-905.
52. Claude, J. 2008. Morphometrics with R. Springer, New York.
53. Cock, A. G. 1966. Genetical aspects of metrical growth and form in animals. Quarterly Review of Biology 41:131-190.
54. Cotton, S., D. W. Rogers, J. Small, A. Pomiankowski, and K. Fowler. 2006. Variation in preference for a male ornament is positively associated with female eyespan in the stalk-eyed fly Diasemopsis meigenii. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 273:1287-1292.
55. Cowley, D. E., and W. R. Atchley. 1990. Development and quantitative genetics of correlation structure among body parts of Drosophilia melanogaster. American Naturalist 135:242-268.
56. Cowley, D. E., and W. R. Atchley. 1992. Quantitative genetic models for development, epigenetic selection, and phenotypic evolution. Evolution 46:495-518.
57. Cuervo, J. J., and A. P. Moller. 2001. Components of phenotypic variation in avian ornamental and non-ornamental feathers. Evolutionary Ecology 15:53-72.
58. D'Amico, L. J., G. Davidowitz, and H. F. Nijhout. 2001. The developmental and physiological basis of body size evolution in an insect. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 268:1589-1593.
59. Darwin, C. 1859. The Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection. London: Murray.
60. David, P., T. Bjorksten, K. Fowler, and A. Pomiankowski. 2000. Condition-dependent signalling of genetic variation in stalk-eyed flies. Nature 406:186-188.
61. David, P., A. Hingle, D. Greig, A. Rutherford, A. Pomiankowski, and K. Fowler. 1998. Male sexual ornament size but not asymmetry reflects condition in stalk-eyed flies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 265:2211-2216.
62. Davidowitz, G., L. J. D'Amico, and H. F. Nijhout. 2004. The effects of environmental variation on a mechanism that controls insect body size. Evolutionary Ecology Research 6:49-62.
63. Davidowitz, G., and H. F. Nijhout. 2004. The physiological basis of reaction norms: The interaction among growth rate, the duration of growth, and body size. Integrative and Comparative Biology 44:443-339.
64. Debat, V., M. Begin, H. Legout, and J. R. David. 2003. Allometric and nonallometric components of Drosophila wing shape respond different to developmental temperature. Evolution 57:2773-2784.
65. de Celis, J. F. 2003. Pattern formation in the Drosophila wing: The development of the veins. BioEssays 25:443-451.
66. de Celis, J. F., and J. Diaz-Benjumea. 2003. Developmental basis for vein pattern variations in insect wings. Internal Journal of Developmental Biology 47:653-663.
67. Dickinson, M. H., F. Lehmann, and S. P. Sane. 1999. Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight. Science 284:1954-1960.
68. Dobzhansky, T., and O. Pavlovsky. 1957. An experimental study of interaction between genetic drift and natural selection. Evolution 11:311-319.
69. Dohrmann, C. E., and H. F. Nijhout. 1988. Development of the wing margin in Precis coenia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Journal for Research on the Lepidoptera 27:151-159.
70. Dryden, I. L., and K. V. Mardia. 2002. Statistical Shape Analysis. West Sussex, U.K.: Wiley.
71. Dudley, R. 2000. The Biomechanics of Insect Flight: Form, Function, Evolution. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
72. Dworkin, I., and G. Gibson. 2006. EGF-R and TGF-ß signalling contributes to variation for wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 173.
73. Eberhard, W. G. 1982. Beetle horn dimorphism: Making the best of a bad lot. American Naturalist 119:420-426.
74. Eberhard, W. G., and E. E. Gutierrez. 1991. Male dimorphisms in beetles and earwigs and the question of developmental constraints. Evolution 45:18-28.
75. Eberhard, W. G., B. A. Huber, R. L. Rodriguez S, R. D. Briceno, I. Salas, and V. Rodriguez. 1998. One size fits all? Relationships between the size and degree of variation in genitalia and other body parts in twenty species of insects and spiders. Evolution 52:415-431.
76. Emlen, D. J. 1994. Environmental control of horn length dimorphism in the beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 256:131-136.
77. Emlen, D. J. 1996. Artificial selection on horn length-body size allometry in the horned beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Evolution 50:1219-1230.
78. Emlen, D. J. 2001. Costs and the diversification of exaggerated animal structures. Science 291:1534-1536.
79. Emlen, D. J., and C. E. Allen. 2004. Genotype to phenotype: Physiological control of trait size and scaling in insects. Integrative and Comparative Biology 43:617-634.
80. Emlen, D. J., J. Hunt, and L. W. Simmons. 2005. Evolution of sexual dimorphism and male dimorphism in the expression of beetle horns: Phylogenetic evidence for modularity, evolutionary lability, and constraint. American Naturalist 166:S42-S68.
81. Emlen, D. J., L. C. Lavine, and B. Ewen-Campen. 2007. On the origin and evolutionary diversification of beetle horns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 104:8661-8668.
82. Emlen, D. J., and H. F. Nijhout. 2000. The development and evolution of exaggerated morphologies in insects. Annual Review of Entomology 45:661-708.
83. Emlen, D. J., and T. K. Philips. 2006. Phylogenetic evidence for an association between tunneling behavior and the evolution of horns in dung beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae). Coleopterists Society Monographs 5:47-56.
84. Emlen, D. J., S. Szafran, L. Corley, and I. Dworkin. 2006. Candidate genes for the development and evolution of beetle horns. Heredity 97:179-191.
85. Ewing, A. W. 1964. The influence of wing area on the courtship behaviour of Drosophila melanogaster. Animal Behaviour 12:316-320.
86. Fairbairn, D. J., and R. F. Preziosi. 1994. Selection and the evolution of allometry for sexual size dimorphism in the water strider, Aquarius remigis. American Naturalist 144:101-118.
87. Fairbairn, D. J., and D. A. Roff. 1999. The endocrine genetics of wing polymorphism in Gryllus. A response to Zera. Evolution 53:977-979.
88. Fairbairn, D. J., and D. E. Yadlowski. 1997. Coevolution of traits determining migratory tendency: correlated response of a critical enzyme, juvenile hormone esterase, to selection on wing morphology. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 10:495-513.
89. Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay. 1996. Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. 4th ed. Essex, U.K.: Longman.
90. Fink, W. L., and M. L. Zelditch. 1995. Phylogenetic analysis of ontogenetic shape transformations: A reassessment of the piranha genus Pygocentrus (Teleostei). Systematic Biology 44:343-360.
91. Fiorello, C. V., and R. Z. German. 1997. Heterochrony within species: Craniofacial growth in giant, standard, and dwarf rabbits. Evolution 51:250-261.
92. Frankino, W. A., and R. A. Raff. 2004. Evolutionary importance and pattern of phenotypic plasticity: Insights gained from development. Pages 64-81 in T. J. DeWitt and S. M. Scheiner, eds. Phenotypic Plasticity, Functional and Conceptual Approaches. New York: Oxford University Press.
93. Frankino, W. A., B. J. Zwaan, D. L. Stern, and P. M. Brakefield. 2005. Natural selection and developmental constraints in the evolution of allometries. Science 307:718-720.
94. Frankino, W. A., B. J. Zwaan, D. L. Stern, and P. M. Brakefield. 2007. Developmental constraints and natural selection in the evolution of a morphological allometry. Evolution 61:2958-2970.
95. Frazier, M. R., J. F. Harrison, S. D. Kirkton, and S. P. Roberts. 2008. Cold rearing improves cold-flight performance in Drosophila via changes in wing morphology. Journal of Experimental Biology 211:2116-2122.
96. Fujiwara, H., and T. Hojyo. 1997. Developmental profiles of wing imaginal discs of flugellos (fl), a wingless mutant of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Developmental Genes and Evolution 207:12-18.
97. Gabriel, K. R., and R. R. Sokal. 1969. A new statistical approach to geographic variation analysis. Systematic Zoology 18:259-270.
98. Garland, T., Jr., and P. A. Carter. 1994. Evolutionary physiology. Annual Review of Physiology 56:579-621.
99. Garland, T., Jr., and P. L. Else. 1987. Seasonal, sexual, and individual variation in endurance and activity metabolism in lizards. American Journal of Physiology 252 (Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology 21):R439-R449.
100. Gayton, J. 2000. History of the concept of allometry. American Zoologist 40:748-758.
101. Gilbert, S. F. 2001. Ecological developmental biology: Developmental biology meets the real world. Developmental Biology 233:1-12.
102. Gilchrist, A. S., R. B. R. Azevedo, L. Partridge, and P. O. O'Higgins. 2000. Adaptation and constraint in the evolution of Drosophila melanogaster wing shape. Evolution and Development 2:114-124.
103. Gilchrist, G. W., and R. B. Huey. 2004. Plastic and genetic variation in wing loading as a function of temperature within and among parallel clines in Drosophila subobscura. Integrative and Comparative Biology 44:461-470.
104. Gilchrist, G. W., R. B. Huey, and L. Serra. 2001. Rapid evolution of wing size clines in Drosophila subobscura. Genetica 112-113:273-286.
105. Gould, S. J. 1966. Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biological Reviews 41:587-640.
106. Gould, S. J. 1973. Positive allometry of antlers in the "Irish Elk" Megaloceros giganteus. Nature 244:375-376.
107. Gould, S. J.1974. The origin and function of "bizarre" structures: Antler size and skull size in the "Irish Elk," Megaloceros giganteus. Evolution 28:191-220.
108. Gross, M. R. 1996. Alternative reproductive strategies and tactics: Diversity within sexes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11:92-98.
109. Hafen, E., and H. Stocker. 2003. How are the sizes of cells, organs, and bodies controlled? Public Library of Science 1:319-323.
110. Hallgrimsson, B., J. J. Y. Brown, A. F. Ford-Hutchinson, H. D. Sheets, M. L. Zelditch, and F. R. Jirik. 2006. The brachymorph mouse and the developmental-genetic basis for canalization and morphological integration. Evolution and Development 8:61-73.
111. Hallgrimsson, B., D. E. Lieberman, W. Liu, A. F. Ford-Hutchinson, and F. R. Jirik. 2007. Epigenetic interactions and the structure of phenotypic variation in the cranium. Evolution and Development 9:76-91.
112. Hartfelder, K., and D. J. Emlen. 2005. Endocrine control of insect polyphenism. In L. I. Gilbert and K. Iatrou, eds. Comprehensive Insect Molecular Science, vol. 3. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
113. Harvey, P. H. 1982. On rethinking allometry. Journal of Theoretical Biology 95:37-41.
114. Hazel, W. N., R. Smock, and M. D. Johnson. 1990. A polygenic model for the evolution and maintenance of conditional strategies. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 242:181-187.
115. Hingle, A., K. Fowler, and A. Pomiankowski. 2001. Size-dependent mate preference in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Animal Behaviour 61:589-595.
116. Hoffmann, A. A., E. Ratna, C. M. Sgro, M. Barton, M. Blacket, R. Hallas, S. De Garis, et al. 2007. Antagonistic selection between adult thorax and wing size in field released Drosophila melanogaster independent of thermal conditions. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20:2219-2227.
117. Hoffmann, A. A., and J. Shirriffs. 2002. Geographic variation for wing shape in Drosophila serrata. Evolution 56:1068-1073.
118. Hojyo, T., and H. Fujiwara. 1997. Reciprocal transplantation of wing discs between a wing deficient mutant (fl) and wild type of the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Development, Growth, & Differentiation 39:599-606.
119. Holloway, G. J., and P. M. Brakefield. 1995. Artificial selection of reaction norms of wing pattern elements in Bicyclus anynana. Heredity 74:91-99.
120. Hosken, D. J., and P. Stockley. 2003. Sexual selection and genital evolution. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19:87-92.
121. Houle, D., J. Mezey, and P. Galpern. 2002. Interpretation of the results of common principal components analyses. Evolution 56:433-440.
122. Houle, D., J. G. Mezey, P. Galpern, and A. Carter. 2003. Automated measurement of Drosophila wings. BMC Evolutionary Biology 3:25.
123. Huey, R. B., G. W. Gilchrist, M. L. Carlson, D. Berrigan, and L. Serra. 2000. Rapid evolution of a geographic cline in size in an introduced fly. Science 287:308-309.
124. Hurley, I., K. Fowler, A. Pomiankowski, and H. Smith. 2001. Conservation of the expression of DII, en, and wg in the eye-antennal imaginal disc of stalk-eyed flies. Evolution and Development 3:408-414.
125. Hurley, I., A. Pomiankowski, K. Fowler, and H. Smith. 2002. Fate map of the eye-antennal imaginal disc in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni. Development Genes and Evolution 212:38-42.
126. Hutchinson, J. M. C. 1999. But which morphospace to choose? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 14:414.
127. Huxley, J.S. 1924. Constant differential growth-ratios and their significance.Nature 114: 895-896.
128. Huxley, J.S. 1932. Problems of Relative Growth. London: Methuen.
129. Huxley, J. S., and G. Teissier. 1936a. Terminologie et notation dans las description de la croissance relative. Competes Rendus des Seances de la Societe de Biologie 121:934-937.
130. Huxley, J. S., and G. Teissier. 1936b. Terminology of relative growth. Nature 137:780-781.
131. Ives, A. R., P. E. Midford, and T. Garland, Jr. 2007. Within-species variation and measurement error in phylogenetic comparative methods. Systematic Biology 56:252-270.
132. Jouffroy, F. K., M. Godinot, and Y. Nakano. 1991. Biometrical characteristics of primate hands. Human Evolution 6:269-306.
133. Kamimura, M., S. Tomita, and H. Fujiwara. 1996. Molecular cloning of an ecdysone receptor (B1 isoform) homologue from the silkworm, Bombyx mori, and its mRNA expression during wing disc development. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology 113B:341-347.
134. Kawano, K. 1995. Horn and wing allometry and male dimorphism in giant rhinoceros beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabacidae) of tropical Asia and America. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 88:92-99.
135. Kawano, K. 2004. Developmental stability and adaptive variability of male genitalia in sexually dimorphic beetles. American Naturalist 163:1-15.
136. Kawano, K. 2006. Sexual dimorphism and the making of oversized male characters in beetles (Coleoptera). Annals of the Entomological Society of America 99:327-341.
137. Ketterson, E. D., V. Nolan, M. J. Cawthorn, P. Parker, and C. Ziegenfus. 1992. Phenotypic engineering: Using hormones to explore the mechanistic and functional bases of phenotypic variation in nature. Ibis 138:70-86.
138. Keys, D. N., et al. 1999. Recruitment of a hedgehog regulatory circuit in butterfly eyespot evolution. Science 283:532-534.
139. Kingsolver, J. G. 1999. Experimental analyses of wing size, flight, and survival in the western white butterfly. Evolution 53:1479-1490.
140. Klingenberg, C. P., A. V. Badyaev, S. M. Sowry, and N. J. Beckwith. 2001a. Inferring developmental modularity from morphological integration: Analysis of individual variation and asymmetry in bumblebee wings. American Naturalist 157:11-23.
141. Klingenberg, C. P., and L. J. Leamy. 2001. Quantitative genetics of geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Evolution 55:2342-2352.
142. Klingenberg, C. P., L. J. Leamy, and J. M. Cheverud. 2004. Integration and modularity of quantitative trait locus effects on geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Genetics 66:1909-1921.
143. Klingenberg, C. P., L. J. Leamy, E. J. Routman, and J. M. Cheverud. 2001b. Genetic architecture of mandible shape in mice: Effects of quantitative trait loci analyzed by geometric morphometrics. Genetics 157:785-802.
144. Klingenberg, C. P., and H. F. Nijhout. 1998. Competition among growing organs and developmental control of morphological asymmetry. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 265:1135-1139.
145. Klingenberg, C. P., and S. D. Zaklan. 2000. Morphological integration between developmental compartments in the Drosophila wing. Evolution 54:1273-1285.
146. Klingenberg, C. P., and M. Zimmermann. 1992. Static, ontogenetic, and evolutionary allometry: A multivariate comparison in nine species of water striders. American Naturalist 140:601-620.
147. Koch, P. B., P. M. Brakefield, and R. Kesbeke. 1996. Ecdysteroids control eyespot size and wing color patter in the polyphenic butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Journal of Insect Physiology 42:223-230.
148. Kodric-Brown, A., R. M. Sibly, and J. H. Brown. 2006. The allometry of ornaments and weapons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 23:8733-8738.
149. Koh, I., M. Lee, N. J. Lee, K. W. Park, K. H. Kim, H. Kim, I. J. Rhyu. Body size effect on brain volume in Korean youth. Neuroreport 16, 2029-32 (2005).
150. Kraaijeveld, K., F. J. L. Kraaijeveld-Smit, and J. Komdeur. 2007. The evolution of mutual ornamentation. Animal Behaviour 74:657-677.
151. Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain:body size allometry. Evolution 33:402-416.
152. Lande, R. 1980. Genetic variation and phenotypic evolution during allopatric speciation. American Naturalist 116:463-479.
153. Lande, R., and S. J. Arnold. 1983. The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37:1210-1226.
154. Langlade, N. B., X. Feng, T. Dransfield, L. Copsey, A. I. Hanna, C. Thebaud, A. Bangham, et al. 2005. Evolution through genetically controlled allometry space. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 102:10221-10226.
155. Lapicque, L. 1907. Tableau général des poids somatiques et encéphaliques dans les espèces animales. Bulletins Société Anthropologie 9:248-269.
156. Le Bihan-Duval, E., S. Mignon-Grasteau, N. Millet, and C. Beaumont. 1999. Genetic analysis of a selection experiment on increased body weight and breast muscle as well as on limited abdominal fat weight. British Poultry Science 39:346-353.
157. Lecuit, T., and L. Le Goff. 2007. Orchestrating size and shape during morphogenesis. Nature 450:189-192.
158. Lemelin, P., and W. L. Jungers. 2007. Body size and scaling of the hands and feet of prosimian primates. American Journal of Physical Anthropology 133:828-840.
159. Liu, J. L., J. M. Mercer, L. F. Stam, G. C. Gibson, Z. Zeng, and C. C. Laurie. 1996. Genetic analysis of a morphological shape difference in the male genitalia of Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. Genetics 142:1129-1145.
160. Lively, C. M. 1986. Canalization versus developmental conversion in a spatially variable environment. American Naturalist 128:561-572.
161. Lofsvold, D. 1988. Quantitative genetics of morphological differentiation in Peromyscus. II. Analysis of selection and drift. Evolution 42:54-67.
162. Long, F., Y. Q. Chen, J. M. Cheverud, and R. Wu. 2006. Genetic mapping of allometric scaling laws. Genetical Research 87:207-216.
163. Lovtrup, S., and M. Lovtrup. 1988. The morphogenesis of molluscan shells: A mathematical account using biological parameters. Journal of Morphology 197:53-62.
164. Maynard Smith, J., R. Burian, S. Kauffman, P. Alberch, J. Campbell, B. Goodwin, R. Lande, et al. 1985. Developmental constraints and evolution. Quarterly Review of Biology 60: 265-287.
165. McDonald, J., and S. Crossley. 1982. Behavioral analysis of lines selected for wing vibration in Drosophila melanogaster. Animal Behaviour 30:802-810.
166. McGee, G. R. 1999. Theoretical Morphology: The Concept and Its Applications. New York: Columbia University Press.
167. McMillan, W. O., A. Monteiro, and D. D. Kapan. 2002. Development and evolution on the wing. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17:125-133.
168. Mezey, J. G., J. M. Cheverud, and G. P. Wagner. 2000. Is the genotype-phenotype map modular? A statistical approach using mouse quantitative trait loci data. Genetics 156:305-311.
169. Mezey, J. G., and D. Houle. 2003. Comparing G matrices: Are common principal components informative? Evolution 165:411-425.
170. Mezey, J. G., and D. Houle. 2005. The dimensionality of genetic variation for wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster Evolution 59:1027-1038.
171. Mezey, J. G., D. Houle, and S. V. Nuzhdin. 2005. Naturally segregating quantitative trait loci affecting wing shape of Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 169:2101-2113.
172. Miner, A. L., A. J. Rosenberg, and H. F. Nijhout. 2000. Control of growth and differentiation of the wing imaginal disk of Precis coenia (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Journal of Insect Physiology 46:251-258.
173. Mitteroecker, P., and F. Bookstein. 2007. The conceptual and statistical relationship between modularity and morphological integration. Systematic Biology 56:818-836.
174. Moczek, A. P. 2006a. A matter of measurements: Challenges and approaches in the comparative analysis of static allometries. American Naturalist 167:606-611.
175. Moczek, A. P. 2006b. Pupal remodeling and the development evolution of sexual dimorphism in horned beetles. American Naturalist 168:711-729.
176. Moczek, A. P., J. Andrews, T. Kijimoto, Y. Yerushalmi, and D. Rose. 2007. Emerging model systems in evo-devo: Horned beetles and the origins of diversity. Evolution and Development 9:323-328.
177. Moczek, A. P., and T. Cruickshank. 2006. When ontogeny reveals what phylogeny hides: Gain and loss of horns during development and evolution of horned beetles. Evolution 60:2329-2341.
178. Moczek, A. P., and D. J. Emlen. 1999. Proximate determination of male horn dimorphism in the beetle Onthophagus taurus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Journal of Evolutionary Biology 12:27-37.
179. Moczek, A. P., J. Hunt, D. J. Emlen, and L. W. Simmons. 2002. Threshold evolution in exotic population of a polyphenic beetle. Evolutionary Ecology Research 4:587-601.
180. Moczek, A. P., and H. F. Nijhout. 2004. Trade-offs during the development of primary and secondary sexual traits in a horned beetle. American Naturalist 163:184-191.
181. Monteiro, A., and K. Costanzo. 2007. The use of chemical and visual cues in female choice in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 274:845-851.
182. Monteiro, A., J. Prijs, M. Bax, T. Hakkaart, and P. M. Brakefield. 2003. Mutants highlight the modular control of butterfly eyespot patterns. Evolution and Development 5:180-187.
183. Monteiro, A. F., P. M. Brakefield, and V. French. 1994. The evolutionary genetics and developmental basis of wing pattern variation in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Evolution 48:1147-1157.
184. Monteiro, A. F., P. M. Brakefield, and V. French. 1997. Butterfly eyespots: The genetics and development of the color rings. Evolution 51:1207-1216.
185. Moran, N. A. 1992. The evolutionary maintenance of alternative phenotypes. American Naturalist 139:971-989.
186. Morgan, T. H. 1911. The origin of five mutations in eye color in Drosophila and their modes of inheritance. Science 7:537-538.
187. Nijhout, H. F. 1991. The Development and Evolution of Butterfly Wing Patterns. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
188. Nijhout, H. F. 1999. Hormonal control in larval development and evolution: Inesects. Pages 217-254 in B. K. Hall and M. H. Wake, eds. The Origin and Evolution of Larval Forms. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
189. Nijhout, H. F. 2003. Development and evolution of adaptive polyphenisms. Evolution and Development 5:9-18.
190. Nijhout, H. F., and D. J. Emlen. 1998. Competition among body parts in the development and evolution of insect morphology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 95:3685-3689.
191. Nijhout, H. F., and D. E. Wheeler. 1996. Growth models of complex allometries in holometabolous insects. American Naturalist 148:40-56.
192. Niklas, K. J. 1999. Evolutionary walks through a land plant morphospace. Journal of Experimental Botany 50:39-52.
193. Nitsu, S. 2001. Wing degeneration due to apoptosis in the female winter moth Nyssiodes lefuarius (Lepidoptera, Geometridae). Entomological Science 4:1-7.
194. Nur, N., and O. Hasson. 1984. Phenotypic plasticity and the handicap principle. Journal of Theoretical Biology 110:275-298.
195. Palestrini, C., A. Rolando, and P. Laiolo. 2000. Allometric relationships and character evolution in Onthophagus taurus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Canadian Journal of Zoology 78:1199-1206.
196. Partridge, L., R. Barrie, K. Fowler, and V. French. 1994. Evolution and development of body size and cell size in Drosophila melanogaster in response to temperature. Evolution 48:1269-1276.
197. Petavy, G., J. R. David, V. Debat, P. Gibert, and B. Moreteau. 2004. Specific effects-of cycling stressful temperatures upon phenotypic and genetic variability of size traits in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolutionary Ecology Research 6:873-890.
198. Petrie, M. 1988. Intraspecific variation in structures that display competitive ability: Large animals invest relatively more. Animal Behaviour 36:1174-1179.
199. Petrie, M. 1992. Are all sexual display structures positively allometry and if so, why? Animal Behaviour 43:173-175.
200. Pezzoli, M. C., D. Guerra, G. Giorgi, F. Garoia, and S. Cavicchi. 1997. Developmental constraints and wing shape variation in natural populations of Drosophila melanogaster. Heredity 79:572-577.
201. Phillips, P. C., M. C. Whitlock, and K. Fowler. 2001. Inbreeding changes the shape of the genetic covariance matrix in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 158:1137-1145.
202. Pijpe, J., P. M. Brakefield, and B. J. Zwaan. 2008. Increased life span in a polyphenic butterfly artificially selected for starvation resistance. American Naturalist 171:81-90.
203. Price, T., Schluter, D., Heckman, N. E. 1993. Sexual selection when the female directly benefits. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 48:187-211.
204. Ramos, D. M., and A. Monteiro. 2007. Transgenic approaches to study wing color pattern development in Lepidoptera. Molecular Biosystems 3:530-535.
205. Rasskin-Gutman, D., and J. C. Izpisua-Belmonte. 2004. Theoretical morphology of developmental asymmetries. BioEssays 26:405-412.
206. Raup, D. M. 1966. Geometric analysis of shell coiling: General problems. Journal of Paleontology 40:1178-1190.
207. Raup, D. M., and S. J. Gould. 1974. Stochastic simulation and evolution of morphology: Towards a nomothetic paleontology. Systematic Zoology 23:305-322.
208. Raup, D. M., S. J. Gould, T. J. M. Schopf, and D. S. Simberloff. 1973. Stochastic models of phylogeny and the evolution of diversity. Journal of Geology:525-542.
209. Raup, D. M., and A. Michelson. 1965. Theoretical morphology of the coiled shell. Science 147:1294-1295.
210. Rayner, J. M. V. 1985. Linear relations in biomechanics: The statistics of scaling functions. Journal of Zoology 206:415-439.
211. Rice, S. H. 1998a. The bio-geometry of mollusc shells. Paleobiology 24:133-149.
212. Rice, S. H. 1998b. The evolution of canalization and the breaking of von Baer's laws: Modeling the evolution of development with epistasis. Evolution 52:647-656.
213. Rice, S. H. 2000. The evolution of developmental interactions: epistasis, canalization, and integration. In J. B. Wolf, E. D. Brodie, and M. J. Wade, eds. Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
214. Rice, S. H. 2002. A general population genetic theory for the evolution of developmental interactions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99:15518-15523.
215. Rice, S. H. 2004a. Developmental associations between traits: Covariance and beyond. Genetics 166:513-526.
216. Rice, S. H. 2004b. Evolutionary Theory: Mathematical and Conceptual Foundations. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
217. Rice, S. H. 2008. Theoretical approaches to the evolution of development and genetic architecture. Pages 1167-1186 in C. D. Schlichting, and T. A. Mousseau, eds. The Year in Evolutionary Biology 2008: Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
218. Ritchie, M. G., R. M. Townhill, and A. Hoikkala. 1998. Female preference for fly song: Playback experiments confirm the targets of sexual selection. Animal Behaviour 56:713-717.
219. Robertson, F. W. 1962. Changing the relative size of the body parts of Drosophila by selection. Genetical Research 3:169-180.
220. Robertson, F. W., and E. C. R. Reeve. 1952. Studies in quantitative inheritance. I. The effects of selection of wing and thorax length in Drosophila melanogaster. Journal of Genetics 50:414-448.
221. Robertson, K. A., and A. Monteiro. 2005. Female Bicyclus anynana butterflies choose males on the basis of their dorsal UV-reflective eyespot pupils. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London 272:1541-1546.
222. Roff, D. A. 1996. The evolution of threshold traits in animals. Quarterly Review of Biology 71:3-35.
223. Roff, D. A. 2000. The evolution of the G matrix: Selection or drift? Heredity 84:135-142.
224. Roff, D. A., G. Stirling, and D. J. Fairbairn. 1997. The evolution of threshold traits: A quantitative genetic analysis of the physiological and life-historical correlates of wing dimorphism in the sand cricket. Evolution 51:1910-1919.
225. Rohlf, F. J. 1998. On applications of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny. Systematic Biology 47:147-158.
226. Rowe, L., and D. Houle. 1996. The lek paradox and the capture of genetic variance by condition dependent traits. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 263: 1415-1421.
227. Sameshima, S. Y., T. Miura, and T. Matsumoto. 2004. Wing disc development during caste differentiation in the ant Pheidole megacephala (Hymenoptera: Formicidae). Evolution and Development 6:336-341.
228. Schlichting, C. D., and M. Pigliucci. 1998. Phenotypic Evolution: A Reaction Norm Perspective. Sunderland, MA: Sinauer.
229. Schluter, D. 1996. Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution 50:1766-1774.
230. Schluter, D., and T. Price. 1993. Honesty, perception and population divergence in sexually selected traits. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, Biological Sciences 253:117-122.
231. Schmidt-Nielsen, K. 1984. Scaling: Why Is Animal Size So Important? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
232. Shingleton, A. W., Mirth, C. K. & Bates, P. W. Developmental model of static allometry in holometabolous insects. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. 275, 1875-85 (2008).
233. Shingleton, A. W., W. A. Frankino, T. Flatt, H. F. Nijhout, and D. J. Emlen. 2007. Size and Shape: The regulation of static allometry in insects. BioEssays 29:536-548.
234. Simpson, P., P. Berreur, and J. Berreur-Bonnenfant. 1980. The initiation of pupariation in Drosophila: Dependence on growth of the imaginal discs. Journal of Embryology and Experimental Morphology 57:155-165.
235. Simmons, L. W., and J. L. Tomkins. 1996. Sexual selection and the allometry of earwig forceps. Evolutionary Ecology 10:97-104.
236. Sinervo, B., and A. L. Basolo. 1996. Testing adaptation using phenotypic manipulations. Pages 149-185 in M. J. Rose and G. V. Lauder, eds. Adaptation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
237. Sinervo, B., and R. B. Huey. 1990. Allometric engineering: An experimental test of the causes of interpopulational differences in locomotor performance. Science 248:1106-1109.
238. Smith, R. J. 1980. Rethinking allometry. Journal of Theoretical Biology 87:97-111.
239. Stalker, H. D. 1980. Chromosome studies in wild populations of Drosophilia melanogaster. II. Relationships of inversion frequencies to latitude, season, wing-loading and flight activity. Genetics 95:211.
240. Stark, J., J. Bonacum, J. Remsen, and R. DeSalle. 1999. The evolution and development of dipteran wing veins: A systematic approach. Annual Review of Entomology 44:97-129.
241. Starmer, W. T., and L. L. Wolf. 1989. Causes of variation in wing loading among Drosophila species. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 37:247-261.
242. Stern, D. L., and D. J. Emlen. 1999. The developmental basis of allometry in insects. Development 126:1091-1101.
243. Stevens, M., C. L. Stuggins, and C. J. Hardman. 2008. The anti-predator function of "eyespots" on camouflaged and conspicuous prey. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 62:1787-1793.
244. Strauss, R. E. 1990. Patterns of quantitative variation in lepidopteran wing morphology: The convergent groups heliconiinae and ithomiinae (Papilionoidea: Nymphalidae). Evolution 44:86-103.
245. Strauss, R. E. 1992. Lepidopteran wing morphology: The multivariate analysis of size, shape, and allometric scaling, Pages 157-179 in J. T. Sorensen and R. Foottit, eds. Ordination in the Study of Morphology, Evolution, and Systematics of Insects: Applications and Quantitative Genetic Rationales. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
246. Sutter, N. B., C. D. Bustamante, K. Chase, M. M. Gray, K. Zhao, L. Zhu, B. Padhukasahasram, et al. 2007. A single IGF1 allele is a major determinant of small size in dogs. Science 316:112-115.
247. Teissier, G. 1926. Sur la biométrie de l'oeil composé des insectes. Bulletin de la Société Zoologique de France 51:510-501.
248. Thompson, D. W. 1917. On Growth and Form. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
249. Trotta, V., F. Garoia, D. Guerra, M. C. Pezzoli, D. Grifoni, and S. Cavicchi. 2005. Developmental instability of the Drosophila wing as an index of genomic perturbation and altered cell proliferation. Evolution and Development 7:234-243.
250. Via, S., R. Gomulkiewicz, G. DeJong, S. M. Scheiner, C. D. Schlichting, and P. H. Van Tienderen. 1995. Adaptive phenotypic plasticity: consensus and controversy. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10:212-217.
251. Viloria, A. L., T. W. Pyrcz, J. Wojtusiak, J. R. Ferrer-Paris, G. W. Beccaloni, K. Sattler, and D. Lees. 2003. A brachypterous butterfly? Proceedings of the Royal Society of London (Suppl.) 270:S21-S24.
252. Wagner, G. P., and L. Altenberg. 1996. Perspective: Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50:967-976.
253. Warton, D. I., I. J. Wright, D. S. Falster, and M. Westoby. 2006. Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry. Biological Review 81:259-291.
254. Weaver, T. D., C. C. Roseman, and C. B. Stringer. 2007. Were neandertal and modern human cranial differences produced by natural selection or genetic drift? Journal of Human Evolution 53:135-145.
255. Weber, K. E. 1990. Selection on wing allometry in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 126:975-989.
256. Weber, K. E. 1992. How small are the smallest selectable domains of form? Genetics 130:345-353.
257. Weber, K. E., and L. T. Diggins. 1990. Increased selection response in larger populations II. Selection for ethanol vapor resistance in Drosophila melanogaster at two population sizes. Genetics 125:585-597.
258. Weber, K. E., R. Eisman, S. Higgins, L. Morey, A. Patty, M. Tausek, and Z. Zeng. 2001. An analysis of polygenes affecting wing shape on chromosome 2 in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 159:1045-1057.
259. Weber, K. E., R. Eisman, L. Morey, A. Patty, J. Sparks, M. Tausek, and Z. Zeng. 1999. An analysis of polygenes affecting wing shape on chromosome 3 in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 153:773-786.
260. Whitlock, M. C., P. C. Phillips, and K. Fowler. 2002. Persistence of changes in the genetic covariance matrix after a bottleneck. Evolution 56:1968-1975.
261. Wickman, P. 1992. Sexual selection and butterfly design: A comparative study. Evolution 46:1525-1536.
262. Wilkinson, G. S. 1993. Artificial selection alters allometry in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni (Diptera: Diopsidae). Genetical Research 62:213-222.
263. Wilkinson, G. S. & Reillo, P. R. Female Choice Response to Artificial Selection on an Exaggerated Male Trait in a Stalk-Eyed Fly. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B-Biological Sciences 255, 1-6 (1994).
264. Wilkinson, G. S., and G. N. Dodson. 1997a. Function and evolution of antlers and eye stalks in flies. Pages 310-328 in J. C. Choe and B. J. Crespi, eds. Mating Systems in Insects and Arachnids. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
265. Wilkinson, G. S., and G. N. Dodson. 1997b. Function and Evolution of Antlers and Eye Stalks in Flies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
266. Wilkinson, G. S., D. C. Presgraves, and L. Crymes. 1998. Male eye span in stalk-eyed flies indicates genetic quality by meiotic drive suppression. Nature 391:276-279.
267. Willimore, K. E., L. Leamy, and B. Hallgrimsson. 2006. Effects of developmental and functional interaction on mouse cranial variability through late ontogeny. Evolution and Development 8:550-567.
268. Willmore, K. E., M. L. Zelditch, N. Young, A. Ah-Seng, S. Lozanoff, and B. Hallgrimsson. 2006. Canalization and developmental stability in the Brachyrrhine mouse. Journal of Anatomy 208:361-372.
269. Wolf, J. B. 2002. The geometry of phenotypic evolution in developmental hyperspace. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 99:15849-15851.
270. Wolf, J. B., C. E. Allen, and W. A. Frankino. 2004. Multivariate phenotypic evolution in developmental hyperspace. Pages 366-389 in M. Pigliucci and K. Preston, eds. Phenotypic Integration: Studying the Ecology and Evolution of Complex Phenotypes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
271. Wolf, J. B., W. A. Frankino, A. F. Agrawal, E. D. Brodie III, and A. J. Moore. 2001. Developmental interactions and the constituents of quantitative variation. Evolution 55:232-245.
272. Zeh, D. W., and J. A. Zeh. 1988. Condition-dependent sex ornaments and field tests of sexualselection theory. American Naturalist 132:454-459.
273. Zelditch, M. L., W. L. Fink, D. L. Swiderski, and B. L. Lundrigan. 1998. On application of geometric morphometrics to studies of ontogeny and phylogeny: A reply to Rohlf. Systematic Biology 47:159-167.
274. Zelditch, M. L., B. L. Lundrigan, and T. Garland, Jr. 2004. Developmental regulation of skull morphology. I. Ontogenetic dynamics of variance. Evolution and Development 6:194-206.
275. Zelditch, M. L., J. Mezey, H. D. Sheets, B. L. Lundrigan, and T. Garland, Jr. 2006. Developmental regulation of skull morphology II. Ontogenetic dynamics of covariance. Evolution and Development 8:46-60.
276. Zelditch, M. L., D. L. Swiderski, H. D. Sheets, and W. L. Fink. 2004. Geometric Morphometrics for Biologists: A Primer. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press.
277. Zera, A. J. 1999. The endocrine genetics of wind polymorphism in Gryllus: Critique of recent studies and state of the art. Evolution 53:973-977.
278. Zera, A. J. 2006. Evolutionary genetics of juvenile hormone and ecdysteroid regulation in Gryllus: A case study in the microevolution of endocrine regulation. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A 144:365-379.
279. Zera, A. J., and R. F. Denno. 1997. Physiology and ecology of dispersal polymorphism in insects. Annual Review of Entomology 42:207-230.
280. Zera, A. J., and Y. Huang. 1999. Evolutionary endocrinology of juvenile hormone esterase: Functional relationship with wing polymorphism in the cricket, Gryllus firmus. Evolution 53:837-847.
281. Zijlstra, W., M. Steigenga, P. Koch, B. Zwaan, and P. M. Brakefield. 2004. Butterfly selected lines explore the hormonal basis of interactions between life histories and morphology. American Naturalist 163:E76-E87.
282. Zimmerman, E., A. Palsson, and G. Gibson. 2000. Quantitative trait loci affecting components of wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 155:671-683.
283. Zwaan, B., R. B. R. Azevedo, A. C. James, J. van't Land, and L. Partridge. 2000. Cellular basis of wing size variation in Drosophilia melanogaster: A comparison of latitudinal clines on two continents. Heredity 84:338-347.