Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: Behavioral traits are more labile

Evolution

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 717-745

  Blomberg, Simon P ^a   Garland Jr , Theodore ^a   Ives, Anthony R ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptation; Behavior; Body size; Branch lengths; Comparative method, constraint; Physiology

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; BEHAVIOR; PHYLOGENETICS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0038325772     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2003.tb00285.x     Document Type: Article

References (141)

1. Abouheif, E. 1999. A method for testing the assumption of phylogenetic independence in comparative data. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1:895-909.
2. Ackerly, D. D. 1999. Comparative plant ecology and the role of phylogenetic information. Pp. 391-413 in M. C. Press, J. D. Scholes, and M. G. Braker, eds. Physiological plant ecology. The 39th symposium of the British Ecological Society held at the University of York, 7-9 September 1998. Blackwell Science, Oxford, U.K.
3. _. 2000. Taxon sampling, correlated evolution, and independent contrasts. Evolution 54:1480-1492.
4. Ackerly, D. D., and M. J. Donoghue. 1998. Leaf size, sapling allometry, and Corner's rules: phylogeny and correlated evolution in maples (Acer). Am. Nat. 152:767-791.
5. Ackerly, D. D., and P. B. Reich. 1999. Convergence and correlations among leaf size and function in seed plants: a comparative test using independent contrasts. Am. J. Bot. 86:1272-1281.
6. Antonovics, J., and P. H. van Tienderen. 1991. Ontoecogenophy-loconstraints? The chaos of constraint terminology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6:166-168.
7. Arnold, E. N. 1994. Investigating the origins of performance advantage: adaptation, exaptation and lineage effects. Pp. 123-168 in P. Eggleton and R. I. Vane-Wright, eds. Phylogenetics and ecology. Linnean Society Symposium Series no. 17. Academic Press, London.
8. Ashton, K. G. 2001. Body size variation among mainland populations of the western rattlesnake (Crotatus viridis). Evolution 55:2523-2533.
9. Barbosa, A. 1993. Morphometric variation of the hindlimb of waders and its evolutionary implications. Ardeola 1993:65-75.
10. Barbosa, A., and E. Moreno. 1999. Evolution of foraging strategies in shorebirds: an ecomorphological approach. Auk 116:712-725.
11. Baum, D. A., and M. J. Donoghue. 2001. A likelihood framework for the phylogenetic analysis of adaptation. Pp. 24-44 in S. Orzack and E. Sober, eds. Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
12. Bjorklund, M. 1997. Are 'comparative methods' always necessary? Oikos 80:607-612.
13. Blomberg, S. P., and T. Garland Jr. 2002. Tempo and mode in evolution: phylogenetic inertia, adaptation and comparative methods. J. Evol. Biol. 15:899-910.
14. Böhning-Gaese, B., and R. Oberrath. 1999. Phylogenetic effects on morphological, life-history, behavioural and ecological traits of birds. Evol. Ecol. Res. 1:347-364.
15. Bonine, K. E., and T. Garland Jr. 1999. Sprint performance of phrynosomatid lizards, measured on a high-speed treadmill, correlates with hindlimb length. J. Zool. (Lond.) 248:255-265.
16. Bonine, K. E., T. T. Gleeson, and T. Garland Jr. 2001. Comparative analysis of fiber-type composition in the iliofibularis muscle of phrynosomatid lizards (Sauria). J. Morphol. 250:265-280.
17. Brashares, J., T. Garland Jr., and P. Arcese. 2000. Phylogenetic analysis of coadaptation in behavior, diet, and body size in the African antelope. Behav. Ecol. 11:452-463.
18. Bush, G. L. 1986. Evolutionary behavior genetics. Pp. 1-5 in M. D. Huettel, ed. Evolutionary genetics of invertebrate behavior, progress and prospects. Plenum Press, New York.
19. Butler, M. A., T. W. Schoener, and J. B. Losos. 2000. The relationship between sexual size dimorphism and habitat use in Greater Antillean Anolis lizards. Evolution 54:259-272.
20. Calder, W. A., III. 1984. Size, function, and life history. Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
21. Chevalier, C. D. 1991. Aspects of thermoregulation and energetics in the Procyonidae (Mammalia: Carnivora). Ph.D. diss., University of California, Irvine, CA.
22. Cheverud, J. M., and M. M. Dow. 1985. An autocorrelation analysis of genetic variation due to lineal fission in social groups of rhesus macaques. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 67:113-121.
23. Cheverud, J. M., M. M. Dow, and W. Leutenegger. 1985. The quantitative assessment of phylogenetic constraints in comparative analyses: sexual dimorphism in body weight among primates. Evolution 39:1335-1351.
24. Clobert, J., T. Garland Jr., and R. Barbault. 1998. The evolution of demographic tactics in lizards: a test of some hypotheses concerning life history evolution. J. Evol. Biol. 11:329-364.
25. Cornillon, P.-A., D. Pontier, and M.-J. Rochet. 2000. Autoregressive models for estimating phylogenetic and environmental effects: accounting for within-species variations. J. Theor. Biol. 202:247-256.
26. Cruz-Neto, A. P., T. Garland Jr., and A. S. Abe. 2001. Diet, phylogeny, and basal metabolic rate in phyllostomid bats. Zoology 104:49-58.
27. Derrickson, E. M., and R. E. Ricklefs. 1988. Taxon-dependent diversification of life-history traits and the perception of phylogenetic constraints. Funct. Ecol. 2:417-423.
28. de Queiroz, A., and P. H. Wimberger. 1993. The usefulness of behavior for phylogeny estimation: levels of homoplasy in behavioral and morphological characters. Evolution 47:46-60.
29. Díaz-Uriarte, R., and T. Garland Jr. 1996. Testing hypotheses of correlated evolution using phylogenetically independent contrasts: sensitivity to deviations from Brownian motion. Syst. Biol. 45:27-47.
30. _. 1998. Effects of branch length errors on the performance of phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 47:654-672.
31. Ebensperger, L. A., and H. Cofre. 2001. On the evolution of group-living in the New World cursorial hystricognath rodents. Behav. Ecol. 12:227-236.
32. Efron, B., and R. J. Tibshirani. 1993. An introduction to the boot-strap: monographs on statistics and applied probability. Chapman and Hall, New York.
33. Farris, J. S. 1989. The retention index and homoplasy excess. Syst. Zool. 18:374-385.
34. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
35. _. 1988. Phylogenies and quantitative characters. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 19:445-471.
36. Ferguson, S. H., and S. Lariviere. 2002. Can comparing life histories help conserve carnivores? Anim. Cons. 5:1-12.
37. Fisher, D. O., and I. P. F. Owens. 2000. Female home range size and the evolution of social organization in macropod marsupials. J. Anim. Ecol. 69:1083-1098.
38. Freckleton, R. P., P. H. Harvey, and M. Pagel. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: a test and review of evidence. Am. Nat. 160:712-726.
39. Futuyma, D. J. 1986. Evolutionary biology. 2d ed. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
40. Garland, T., Jr. 1992. Rate tests for phenotypic evolution using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Am. Nat. 140:509-519.
41. _. 2001. Phylogenetic comparison and artificial selection: two approaches in evolutionary physiology. Pp 107-132 in R. C. Roach, P. D. Wagner, and P. H. Hackett, eds. Hypoxia: from genes to the bedside. Advances in experimental biology and medicine. Vol. 502. Kluwer/Plenum Academic, New York.
42. Garland, T., Jr., and S. C. Adolph. 1991. Physiological differentiation of vertebrate populations. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 22:193-228.
43. _. 1994. Why not to do two-species comparative studies: limitations on inferring adaptation. Physiol. Zool. 67:797-828.
44. Garland, T., Jr., and R. Díaz-Uriarte. 1999. Polytomies and phylogenetically independent contrasts: an examination of the bounded degrees of freedom approach. Syst. Biol. 48:547-558.
45. Garland, T., Jr., and A. R. Ives. 2000. Using the past to predict the present: confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. Am. Nat. 155:346-364.
46. Garland, T., Jr., and C. M. Janis. 1993. Does metatarsal/femur ratio predict maximal running speed in cursorial mammals? J. Zool. 229:133-151.
47. Garland, T., Jr., R. B. Huey, and A. F. Bennett. 1991. Phylogeny and thermal physiology in lizards: a reanalysis. Evolution 45:1969-1975.
48. Garland, T., Jr., P. H. Harvey, and A. R. Ives. 1992. Procedures for the analysis of comparative data using phylogenetically independent contrasts. Syst. Biol. 41:18-32.
49. Garland, T., Jr., A. W. Dickerman, C. M. Janis, and J. A. Jones. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Syst. Biol. 42:265-292.
50. Garland, T., Jr., K. L. M. Martin, and R. Díaz-Uriarte. 1997. Reconstructing ancestral trait values using squared-change parsimony: plasma osmolarity at the origin of amniotes. Pp. 425-501 in S. S. Sumida and K. L. M. Martin, eds. Amniote origins: completing the transition to land. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
51. Garland, T., Jr., P. E. Midford, and A. R. Ives. 1999. An introduction to phylogenetically based statistical methods, with a new method for confidence intervals on ancestral values. Am. Zool. 39:374-388.
52. Geffen, E., M. E. Gompper, J. L. Gittleman, H.-K. Luh, D. W. Macdonald, and R. K. Wayne. 1996. Size, life-history traits, and social organization in the Canidae: a reevaluation. Am. Nat. 147:140-160.
53. Gibert, P., and R. B. Huey. 2001. Chill-coma temperature in Drosophila. Physiol. Biochem. Zool. 74:429-434.
54. Gittleman, J. L., and M. Kot. 1990. Adaptation: statistics and a null model for estimating phylogenetic effects. Syst. Zool. 39:227-241.
55. Gittleman, J. L., and H.-K. Luh. 1992. On comparing comparative methods. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23:383-404.
56. _. 1994. Phylogeny, evolutionary models and comparative methods: a simulation study. Pp. 103-122 in P. Eggleton and D. Vane-Wright, eds. Phylogenetics and ecology. Academic Press, London.
57. Gittleman, J. L., and B. Van Valkenburgh. 1997. Sexual dimorphism in the canines and skulls of carnivores: effects of size, phylogeny and behavioural ecology. J. Zool. (Lond.) 242:97-117.
58. Gittleman, J. L., C. G. Anderson, M. Kot, and H.-K. Luh. 1996a. Phylogenetic lability and rates of evolution: a comparison of behavioral, morphological and life history traits. Pp. 166-205 in E. P. Martins, ed. Phylogenies and the comparative method in animal behavior. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
59. _. 1996b. Comparative tests of evolutionary lability and rates using molecular phylogenies. Pp. 289-307 in P. H. Harvey, A. J. Leigh Brown, J. Maynard Smith, and S. Nee, eds. New uses for new phylogenies. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
60. Grafen, A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 326:119-156.
61. Hansen, T. F. 1997. Stabilizing selection and the comparative analysis of adaptation. Evolution 51:1341-1351.
62. Hansen, T. F., and E. P. Martins. 1996. Translating between microevolutionary process and macroevolutionary patterns: the correlation structure of interspecific data. Evolution 50:1404-1417.
63. Harcourt, A. H., P. H. Harvey, S. G. Larson, and R. V. Short. 1981. Testis weight, body weight and breeding system in primates. Nature 293:55-57.
64. Harris, M. A., and K. Steudel. 1997. Ecological correlates of hindlimb length in the Carnivora. J. Zool. (Lond.) 241:381-408.
65. Harvey, P. H., and T. H. Clutton-Brock. 1985. Life history variation in primates. Evolution 39:559-581.
66. Harvey, P. H., and A. H. Harcourt. 1984. Sperm competition, testes size, and breeding system in primates. Pp. 589-600 in R. L. Smith, ed. Sperm competition and the evolution of animal mating systems. Academic Press, New York.
67. Harvey, P. H., and M. D. Pagel. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
68. Harvey, P. H., and A. Rambaut. 1998. Phylogenetic extinction rates and comparative methodology. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 265:1691-1696.
69. _. 2000. Comparative analyses for adaptive radiation. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 355:1599-1605.
70. Hillis, D. M., and J. P. Huelsenbeck. 1992. Signal, noise, and reliability in molecular phylogenetic analyses. J. Hered. 83:189-195.
71. Housworth, E. A., and E. P. Martins. 2001. Random sampling of constrained phylogenies: conducting phylogenetic analyses when the phylogeny is partially known. Syst. Biol. 50:628-639.
72. Huey, R. B., and A. F. Bennett. 1987. Phylogenetic studies of coadaptation: preferred temperatures versus optimal performance temperatures of lizards. Evolution 41:1098-1115.
73. Hutcheon, J. M. 2001. Molecular systematics of the Chiroptera: a phylogenetic analysis using DNA-DNA hybridization and the comparative method. Ph.D. diss., University of Wisconsin, Madison, WI.
74. Irschick, D. J., L. J. Vitt, P. A. Zani, and J. B. Losos. 1997. A comparison of evolutionary radiations in mainland and Caribbean Anotis lizards. Evolution 78:2191-2203.
75. Iwaniuk, A. N., and J. E. Nelson. 2001. A comparative analysis of relative brain size in waterfowl (Anseriformes). Brain Behav. Evol. 57:87-97.
76. Jablonski, D. 1987. Heritability at the species level: analysis of geographic ranges of Cretaceous mollusks. Science 238:360-362.
77. Jackson, J. F., D. C. Adams, and U. B. Jackson. 1999. Allometry of constitutive defense: a model and a comparative test with tree bark and fire regime. Am. Nat. 153:614-632.
78. Judge, G. G., W. E. Griffiths, R. C. Hill, H. Lutkepohl, and T.-C. Lee. 1985. The theory and practice of econometrics. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
79. Lapointe, F.-J., and T. Garland Jr. 2001. A generalized permutation model for the analysis of cross-species data. J. Classif. 18:109-127.
80. Legendre, P., F.-J. Lapointe, and P. Casgrain. 1994. Modeling brain evolution from behavior: a permutational regression approach. Evolution 48:1487-1499.
81. Losos, J. B. 1990. Ecomorphology, performance capability, and scaling of West Indian Anolis lizards: an evolutionary analysis. Ecol. Monogr. 60:369-388.
82. _. 1999. Uncertainty in the reconstruction of ancestral character states and limitations on the use of phylogenetic comparative methods. Anim. Behav. 58:1319-1324.
83. _. 2000. Ecological character displacement and the study of adaptation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97:5693-5695.
84. Losos, J. B., and D. B. Miles. 2002. Testing the hypothesis that a clade has adaptively radiated: iguanid lizard clades as a case study. Am. Nat. 160:147-157.
85. Lynch, M. 1991. Methods for analysis of comparative data in evolutionary biology. Evolution 45:1065-1080.
86. Maddison, W. P., and M. Slatkin. 1991. Null models for the number of evolutionary steps in a character on a phylogenetic tree. Evolution 45:1184-1197.
87. Martins, E. P. 1994. Estimating the rate of phenotypic evolution from comparative data. Am. Nat. 144:193-209.
88. _. 1996. Phylogenies, spatial autoregression and the comparative method: a computer simulation test. Evolution 50:1750-1765.
89. Martins, E. P., and T. Garland Jr. 1991. Phylogenetic analyses of the correlated evolution of continuous characters: a simulation study. Evolution 45:534-557.
90. Martins, E. P., and T. F. Hansen. 1997. Phylogenies and the comparative method: a general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am. Nat. 149:646-667. Erratum. Am. Nat. 153:448.
91. Martins, E. P., and J. Lamont. 1998. Estimating ancestral states of a communicative display: a comparative study of Cyclura rock iguanas. Anim. Behav. 55:1685-1706.
92. Martins, E. P., J. A. F. Diniz-Filho, and E. A. Housworth. 2002. Adaptive constraints and the phylogenetic comparative method: a computer simulation test. Evolution 56:1-13.
93. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. The Belknap Press of Harvard Univ. Press, Cambridge, MA.
94. _. 1982. The growth of biological thought: diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
95. Mazer, S. J. 1998. Alternative approaches to the analysis of comparative data: compare and contrast. Am. J. Bot. 85:1194-1199.
96. McKitrick, M. C. 1993. Phylogenetic constraint in evolutionary theory: Has it any explanatory power? Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 24:307-330.
97. Møller, A. P., S. Merino, C. R. Brown, and R. J. Robertson. 2001. Immune defense and host sociality: a comparative study of swallows and martins. Am. Nat. 158:136-145.
98. Mooers, A. Ø., S. M. Vamosi, and D. Schluter. 1999. Using phylogenies to test macroevolutionary hypotheses of trait evolution in cranes (Gruinae). Am. Nat. 154:249-259.
99. Morales, E. 2000. Estimating phylogenetic inertia in Tithonia (Asteracea): a comparative approach. Evolution 54:475-484.
100. Mousseau, T. A., and D. A. Roff. 1987. Natural selection and the heritability of fitness components. Heredity 59:181-197.
101. Nunn, C. L., and R. A. Barton. 2000. Allometric slopes and independent contrasts: a comparative test of Kleiber's Law in primate ranging patterns. Am. Nat. 156:519-533.
102. Orzack, S. H., and E. Sober. 2001. Adaptation, phylogenetic inertia, and the method of controlled comparisons. Pp. 45-63 in S. H. Orzack and E. Sober, eds. Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
103. Pagel, M. D. 1992. A method for the analysis of comparative data. J. Theor. Biol. 156:431-442.
104. _. 1994. Detecting correlated evolution on phylogenies: a general method for the comparative analysis of discrete characters. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 255:37-45.
105. _. 1999. Inferring the historical patterns of biological evolution. Nature 401:877-884.
106. Perry, G., and T. Garland Jr. 2002. Lizard home ranges revisited: effects of sex, body size, diet, habitat, and phylogeny. Ecology 83:1870-1885.
107. Pierce, V. A., and D. L. Crawford. 1997. Phylogenetic analysis of glycolytic enzyme expression. Science 276:256-259.
108. Pitnick, S. 1996. Investment in testes and the cost of making long sperm in Drosophila species. Am. Nat. 148:57-80.
109. Plomin, R. 1990. The role of inheritance in behavior. Science 248:183-188.
110. Plotkin, H. C., ed. 1988. The role of behavior in evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
111. Price, T. 1997. Correlated evolution and independent contrasts. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 352:519-529.
112. Prinzing, A., W. Durka, S. Klotz, and R. Brandl. 2001. The niche of higher plants: evidence for phylogenetic conservatism. Proc. R. Soc. London Ser. B 268:2383-2389.
113. Purvis, A. 1995. A composite estimate of primate phylogeny. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B 348:405-421.
114. Purvis, A., and T. Garland Jr. 1993. Polytomies in comparative analyses of continuous characters. Syst. Biol. 42:569-575.
115. Purvis, A., and A. Rambaut. 1995. Comparative analysis by independent contrasts (CAIC): an Apple Macintosh application for analysing comparative data. Computer Appl. Biosci. 11:247-251.
116. Purvis, A., J. L. Gittleman, and H.-K. Luh. 1994. Truth or consequences: effects of phylogenetic accuracy on two comparative methods. J. Theor. Biol. 167:293-300.
117. Reeve, H. K., and P. W. Sherman. 2001. Optimality and phylogeny: a critique of current thought. Pp. 45-63 in S. H. Orzack and E. Sober, eds. Adaptationism and optimality. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
118. Reynolds, P. S., and R. M. Lee III. 1996. Phylogenetic analysis of avian energetics: passerines and nonpasserines do not differ. Am. Nat. 147:735-759.
119. Rezende, E. L., D. L. Swanson, F. F. Novoa, and F. Bozinovic. 2002. Passerines versus nonpasserines: so far, no statistical differences in the scaling of avian energetics. J. Exp. Biol. 205:101-107.
120. Ridley, M. 1983. The explanation of organic diversity: the comparative method and adaptations for mating. Clarendon, Oxford, U.K.
121. Roff, D. A. 1992. The evolution of life histories: theory and analysis. Routledge, Chapman and Hall, New York.
122. Rohlf, F. J. 2001. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: geometric interpretations. Evolution 55:2143-2160.
123. Schluter, D., T. Price, A. Ø. Mooers, and D. Ludwig. 1997. Likelihood of ancestor states in adaptive radiation. Evolution 51:1699-1711.
124. Schwenk, K., and G. P. Wagner. 2001. Function and the evolution of phenotypic stability: connecting pattern to process. Am. Zool. 41:552-563.
125. Sessions, S. K., and A. Larson. 1987. Developmental correlates of genome size in plethodontid salamanders and their implications for genome evolution. Evolution 41:1239-1251.
126. Sibley, C. G., and J. E. Ahlquist. 1990. Phylogeny and classification of birds: a study in molecular evolution. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven, CT.
127. Smith, R. J., and J. M. Cheverud. 2002. Scaling of sexual size dimorphism in body mass: a phylogenetic analysis of Rensch's rule in primates. Int. J. Primatol. 23:1095-1135.
128. Stearns, S. C. 1983. The influence of size and phylogeny on patterns of covariation among life-history traits in mammals. Oikos 41:173-187.
129. Stirling, D. G., D. Réale, and D. A. Roff. 2002. Selection, structure and the heritability of behaviour. J. Evol. Biol. 15:277-289.
130. Swiderski, D. L. 2001. The role of phylogenies in comparative biology: an introduction to the symposium. Am. Zool. 41:485-486.
131. Székely, T., J. D. Reynolds, and J. Figuerola. 2000. Sexual size dimorphism in shorebirds, gulls and alcids: the influence of sexual and natural selection. Evolution 54:1404-1413.
132. Taigen, T. L., and F. H. Pough. 1985. Metabolic correlates of anuran behavior. Am. Zool. 25:987-997.
133. Tobalske, B. W., and K. P. Dial. 2000. Effects of body size on take-off flight performance in the Phasianidae (Aves). J. Exp. Biol. 203:3319-3332.
134. von Neumann J., R. H. Kent, H. R. Bellinson, and B. I. Hart. 1941. The mean square successive difference. Ann. Math. Star. 12:153-162.
135. Wagner, G. P., and K. Schwenk. 2000. Evolutionarily stable configurations: functional integration and the evolution of phenotypic stability. Evol. Biol. 31:155-217.
136. Wake, D. 1991. Homoplasy: the result of natural selection, or evidence of design limitations?. Am. Nat. 138:543-567.
137. Wcislo, W. T. 1989. Behavioral environments and evolutionary change. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 20:137-169.
138. Westoby, M., M. Leishman, and J. Lord. 1995. On misinterpreting the phylogenetic correction. J. Ecol. 83:531-534.
139. Wiens, J. J., and J. L. Slingluff. 2001. How lizards turn into snakes: a phylogenetic analysis of body-form evolution in anguid lizards. Evolution 55:2303-2318.
140. Wimberger, P. H., and A. de Queiroz. 1996. Comparing behavioral and morphological characters as indicators of phylogeny. Pp. 206-233 in E. P. Martins, ed. Phylogenies and the comparative method in animal behavior. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
141. Wolf, C. M., T. Garland Jr., and B. Griffith. 1998. Predictors of avian and mammalian translocation success: reanalysis with phylogenetically independent contrasts. Biol. Conserv. 86:243-255.