Effects of developmental and functional interactions on mouse cranial variability through late ontogeny

Evolution and Development

Volumn 8, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 550-567

  Willmore, Katherine Elizabeth ^a,c   Leamy, Larry ^b   Hallgrímsson, Benedikt ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT CHARLOTTE   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CRANIUM; GROWTH; ONTOGENY; PHENOTYPE; PRIMATE; RODENT;

AGE; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AUDIOVISUAL EQUIPMENT; FEMALE; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; IMAGE PROCESSING; MALE; MOUSE; PHYSIOLOGY; SKULL;

AGE FACTORS; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; FEMALE; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MALE; MICE; MODELS, ANATOMIC; SKULL;

MAMMALIA; PRIMATES;

EID: 33750464209     PISSN: 1520541X     EISSN: 1525142X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-142X.2006.00127.x     Document Type: Article

References (72)

1. Atchley, W. R. 1984. Ontogeny, timing of development, and genetic variance-covariance structure. Am. Nat. 123: 519-540.
2. Barnett, V., and Lewis, T. 1994. Outliers in Statistical Data. Wiley Series in Probability and Statistics. 3rd Ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
3. Bogin, B. 1988. Patterns of Human Growth. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
4. Cardini, A., and O'Higgins, P. 2005. Post-natal ontogeny of the mandible and ventral cranium in Marmota species (Rodentia, Sciuridae): allometry and phylogeny. Zoomorphology 124: 189-203.
5. Chernoff, B., and Magwene, P. M. 1999. Morphological integration: forty years later. In Morphological Integration. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 319-353.
6. Cheverud, J. M. 1982. Phenotypic, genetic, and environmental morphological integration in the cranium. Evolution 36: 499-516.
7. Cheverud, J. M. 1988. A comparison of genetic and phenotypic correlations. Evolution 42: 958-968.
8. Cheverud, J. M. 1995. Morphological integration in the saddle-back tamarin (Saguinus fuscicollis) cranium. Am. Nat. 145: 63-89.
9. Cheverud, J. M., Routman, E. J., and Irschick, D. J. 1997. Pleiotropic effects of individual gene loci on mandibular morphology. Evolution 51: 2006-2016.
10. Cheverud, J. M., Wagner, G. P., and Dow, M. C. 1989. Methods for the comparative analysis of variation patterns. Syst. Zool. 38: 201-213.
11. Cole, T. M. III. 2002. WinEDMA: Windows-based software for Euclidean distance matrix analysis. University of Missouri at Kansas City.
12. Ehrich, T. H., et al. 2003. Pleiotropic effects on mandibular morphology I. Developmental morphological integration and differential dominance. J. Exp. Zool. B 296B: 58-79.
13. González-José, R., Van der Molen, S., González- Pérez, E., and Hernández, M. 2004. Patterns of phenotypic covariation and correlation in modern humans as viewed from morphological integration. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 123: 69-77.
14. Goodall, C. R. 1991. Procrustes methods in the statistical analysis of shape (with discussion and rejoinder). J. Roy. Stat. Soc Ser. B 53: 285-339.
15. Hallgrímsson, B. 1998. Fluctuating asymmetry in the mammalian skeleton: evolutionary and developmental implications. Evol. Biol. 30: 187-251.
16. Hallgrímsson, B. 1999. Ontogenetic patterning of skeletal fluctuating asymmetry in rhesus macaques and humans: evolutionary and developmental implications. Int. J. Primatol. 20: 121-151.
17. Hallgrímsson, B., Miyake, T., Willmore, K., and Hall, B. K. 2003. Embryological origins of developmental stability: size, shape and fluctuating asymmetry in prenatal random bred mice. J. Exp. Zoolog. B 296B: 40-57.
18. Hallgrímsson, B., Willmore, K., Dorval, C., and Cooper, D. M. 2004. Craniofacial variability and modularity in macaques and mice. J. Exp. Zoolog. B. 302B: 207-225.
19. Hallgrímsson, B., Willmore, K., and Hall, B. K. 2002. Canalization, developmental stability, and morphological integration in primate limbs. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 35 (suppl.): 131-158.
20. Herring, S. W. 1985. The ontogeny of mammalian mastication. Am. Zool. 25: 339-349.
21. Jiang, X., Iseki, S., Maxson, R. E., Sucoy, H. M., and Morriss-Kay, G. M. 2002. Tissue origins and interactions in the mammalian skull vault. Dev. Biol. 241: 106-116.
22. Klingenberg, C. P., Barluenga, M., and Meyer, A. 2002. Shape analysis of symmetric structures: quantifying variation among individuals and asymmetry. Evolution 56: 1909-1920.
23. Klingenberg, C. P., Leamy, L. J., and Cheverud, J. M. 2004. Integration and modularity of quantitative trait locus effects on geometric shape in the mouse mandible. Genetics 166: 1909-1921.
24. Klingenberg, C. P., Leamy, L. J., Routman, E. S., and Cheverud, J. M. 2001. Genetic architecture of mandible shape in mice: effects of quantitative trait loci analyzed by geometric morphometrics. Genetics 157: 785-802.
25. Klingenberg, C. P., and McIntyre, G. S. 1998. Geometric morphometrics of developmental instability: analyzing patterns of fluctuating asymmetry with procrustes methods. Evolution 52: 1363-1375.
26. Langenbach, G. E. J., and van Eijden, T. M. G. J. 2001. Mammalian feeding motor patterns. Am. Zool. 41: 1338-1351.
27. Leamy, L. 1974. Heritability of osteometric traits in a random bred population of house mice. J. Hered. 65: 109-120.
28. Leamy, L. J., Routman, E. J., and Cheverud, J. M. 1999. Quantitative trait loci for early- and late-developing skull characters in mice: a test of the genetic independence model of morphological integration. Am. Nat. 153: 201-214.
29. Lele, S. 1993. Euclidean distance matrix analysis (EDMA) of landmarks data: estimation of mean form and mean form difference. Math. Geol. 25: 573-602.
30. Lele, S., and Richtsmeier, J. 2001. An Invariant Approach to the Statistical Analysis of Shapes. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca Raton.
31. Mardia, K. V., Bookstein, F. L., and Moreton, I. J. 2000. Statistical assessment of bilateral symmetry of shapes. Biometrika 87: 285-300.
32. Marquez, E. 2004. Sage3D. University of Michigan Museum of Zoology, Ann Arbor, MI.
33. Marriog, G., and Cheverud, J. M. 2001. A comparison of phenotypic variation and covariation patterns and the role of phylogeny, ecology, and ontogeny during cranial evolution of new world monkeys. Evolution 55: 2576-2600.
34. Mezey, J. G., Cheverud, J. M., and Wagner, G. P. 2000. Is the genotype-phenotype map modular? A statistical approach using mouse quantitative trait loci data. Genetics 156: 305-311.
35. Moore, W. 1981. The Mammalian Skull. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
36. Moss, M. L. 1968. The primacy of functional matrices in orofacial growth. Trans. Br. Soc. Study Orthod. Dent. Pract. 19: 65-73.
37. Moss, M. L. 1997a. The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 1. The role of mechanotransduction. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 112: 8-11.
38. Moss, M. L. 1997b. The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 2. The role of an osseous connected cellular network. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 112: 221-226.
39. Moss, M. L. 1997c. The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 3. The genomic thesis. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 112: 338-342.
40. Moss, M. L. 1997d. The functional matrix hypothesis revisited. 4. The epigenetic antithesis and the resolving synthesis. Am. J. Orthod. Dentofac. Orthop. 112: 410-417.
41. Nonaka, K., and Nakata, M. 1984. Genetic variation and craniofacial growth in inbred rats. J. Craniofac. Gen. Dev. 4: 271-302.
42. O'Higgins, P., and Jones, N. 1998. Morphologika. University College London, London.
43. Olson, E. C., and Miller, R. A. 1958. Morphological Integration. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
44. Palmer, A. R. 1994. Fluctuating asymmetry analyses: a primer. In T. A. Markow (ed.). Developmental Instability: Its Origins and Evolutionary Implications. Academic Publishers, Dordrecht Kluwer, pp. 355-364.
45. Palmer, A. R., and Strobeck, C. 1986. Fluctuating asymmetry: measurement, analysis, patterns. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 17: 391-421.
46. Palmer, A. R., and Strobeck, C. 2003. Fluctuating asymmetry analysis unplugged. In M. Polak (ed.). Developmental Instability (DI): Causes and Consequences. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 279-319.
47. Parker, L. T., and Leamy, L. 1991. Fluctuating asymmetry of morphometric characters in house mice: the effects of age, sex, and phenotypical extremeness in a random bred population. J. Hered. 82: 145-150.
48. Richtsmeier, J. T., Deleon, V. B., and Lele, S. R. 2002. The promise of geometric morphometrics. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol. 35 (suppl.): 63-91.
49. Riska, B., Atchley, W. R., and Rutledge, J. J. 1984. A genetic analysis of targeted growth in mice. Genetics 107: 79-101.
50. Rohlf, F. J. 2000. Statistical power comparisons among alternative morphometric methods. Am. J. Phys. Anthrop. 111: 463-478.
51. Rutherford, S. L. 2000. From genotype to phenotype: buffering mechanisms and the storage of genetic information. Bioessays 22: 1095-1105.
52. Schmalhausen, I. I. 1949. Factors of Evolution. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
53. Sheets, H. D. 2004a. Simple3D. Canisius College, Buffalo, NY.
54. Sheets, H. D. 2004b. 3DPCA. Canisius College, Buffalo, NY.
55. Sheets, H. D. 2004c. 3DRegress6. Canisius College, Buffalo, NY.
56. Slice, D. E. 1994-1999. Morpheus. State University of New York (SUNY), Stony Brook.
57. Thexton, A. J., German, R. Z., and Crompton, A. W. 1995. Latency of the jaw-opening reflex in the premature, preweaning and adolescent pig (Hanford strain miniature pig, Sus scrofa). Archs. Oral Biol. 40: 1133-1135.
58. Van Valen, L. 1962. A study of fluctuating asymmetry. Evolution 16: 125-142.
59. Van Valen, L. 1978. The statistics of variation. Evol. Theor. 4: 33-43.
60. Van Valen, L. 2005. The statistics of variation. In B. Hallgrímsson and B. K. Hall (eds.). Variation: A Central Concept in Biology. Elsevier Academic Press, London, pp. 29-46.
61. Waddington, C. H. 1957. Strategy of the Genes. MacMillan, New York.
62. Wagner, G. P. 1990. A comparative study of morphological integration in Apis meliffera (Insecta, Hymenoptera) Z. Zool. Syst. Evol.-Forsch. 28: 48-61.
63. Wagner, G. P. 1996. Homologues, natural kinds and the evolution of modularity. Am. Zool. 36: 36-43.
64. Wagner, G. P., and Altenberg, L. 1996. Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50: 967-976.
65. Wagner, G. P., Booth, G., and Bagheri-Chaichian, H. 1997. A population genetic theory of canalization. Evolution 51: 329-347.
66. Zelditch, M. L. 1988. Ontogenetic variation in patterns of phenotypic integration in the laboratory rat. Evolution 42: 28-41.
67. Zelditch, M. L., Bookstein, F. L., and Lundrigan, B. L. 1992. Ontogeny of integrated skull growth in the cotton rat Sigmodon fulviventer. Evolution 46: 1164-1180.
68. Zelditch, M. L., Bookstein, F. L., and Lundrigan, B. L. 1993. The ontogenetic complexity of developmental constraints. J. Evol. Biol. 6: 621-641.
69. Zelditch, M.L, and Carmichael, C. 1989. Growth and intensity of integration through postnatal growth in the skull Sigmodon fulfiventer. J. Mamm. 70: 477-484.
70. Zelditch, M. L., Lundrigan, B. L., and Garland, T. 2004. Developmental regulation of skull morphology I. Ontogenetic dynamics of variance. Evol. Dev. 6: 194-206.
71. Zelditch, M. L., Lundrigan, B. L., Sheets, H. D., and Garland, T. Jr. 2003. Do precocial mammals develop at a faster rate? A comparison of rates of skull development in Sigmodon fulviventer and Mus musculus domesticus. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 708-720.
72. Zelditch, M. L., Mezey, J., Sheets, H. D., Lundrigan, B. L., and Garland, T. 2006. Developmental regulation of skull morphology II. Ontogenetic dynamics of covariance. Evol. Dev. 8: 46-60.