Within-species variation and measurement error in phylogenetic comparative methods

Systematic Biology

Volumn 56, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 252-270

  Ives, Anthony R ^a   Midford, Peter E ^b   Garland Jr , Theodore ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b SOUTHERN ILLINOIS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Ancestor reconstruction; Comparative methods; Estimated generalized least squares; Independent contrasts; Maximum likelihood; Morphometrics; Principal components analysis; Reduced major axis; Regression; Restricted maximum likelihood

Indexed keywords

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; LIZARD; METHODOLOGY; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ANIMALS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; LIZARDS; PHENOTYPE; PHYLOGENY; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE; VARIATION (GENETICS);

EID: 34447280382     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10635150701313830     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Ashton, K. G. 2004. Comparing phylogenetic signal in intraspecific and interspecific body size datasets. J. Evol. Biol. 17:1157-1161. (Pubitemid 39175183)
2. Bauwens, D., T. Garland, Jr., A. M. Castilla, and R. Vandamme. 1995. Evolution of sprint speed in lacertid lizards - Morphological, physiological, and behavioral covariation. Evolution 49:848-863. (Pubitemid 3002807)
3. Blomberg, S. P., T. Garland, Jr., and A. R. Ives. 2003. Testing for phylogenetic signal in comparative data: Behavioral traits are more labile. Evolution 57:171-745.
4. Bonine, K. E., T. T. Gleeson, and T. Garland, Jr. 2005. Muscle fibre-type variation in lizards (Squamata) and phylogenetic reconstruction of hypothesized ancestral states. J. Exp. Biol. 208:4529-4547. (Pubitemid 43028115)
5. Burnham, K. T., and D. R. Anderson. 1998. Model selection and inference: A practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York.
6. Butler, M. A., and A. A. King. 2004. Phylogenetic comparative analysis: A modeling approach for adaptive evolution. Am. Nat. 164:683-695. (Pubitemid 40099523)
7. Christman, M. C., R. W. Jernigan, and D. Culver. 1997. A comparison of two models for estimating phylogenetic effect on trait variation. Evolution 51:262-266. (Pubitemid 27164681)
8. Cooper, D. M., and R. Thompson. 1977. Note on estimation of parameters of autoregressive-moving average process. Biomerrika 64:625-628. (Pubitemid 8238546)
9. Efron, B., and R. J. Tibshirani. 1993. An introduction to the bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York.
10. Felsenstein, J. 1985. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1-15.
11. Felsenstein, J. 2004. Inferring phylogenies. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
12. Freckleton, R. P., P. H. Harvey, and M. Pagel. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis and comparative data: A test and review of evidence. Am. Nat.160:712-726. (Pubitemid 36035851)
13. Fuller, W. A. 1987. Measurement error models. John Wiley & Sons, New York.
14. Garland, T., Jr., A. W. Dickerman, C. M. Janis, and J. A. Jones. 1993. Phylogenetic analysis of covariance by computer simulation. Syst. Biol. 42:265-292.
15. Garland, T., Jr., and A. R. Ives. 2000. Using the past to predict the present: Confidence intervals for regression equations in phylogenetic comparative methods. Am. Nat. 155:346-364.
16. Garland, T., Jr., P. E. Midford, and A. R. Ives. 1999. An introduction to phylogenetically based statistical methods, with a new method for confidence intervals on ancestral values. Am. Zool. 39:374-388.
17. Garland, T., Jr., A. F. Bennett, and E. L. Rezende. 2005. Phylogenetic approaches in comparative physiology. J. Exp. Biol. 208:3015-3055.
18. Garland, T., Jr., and R. Díaz-Uriarte. 1999. Polytomies and phylogenetically independent contrasts: An examination of the bounded degrees of freedom approach. Syst. Biol. 48:547-558. (Pubitemid 129479562)
19. Grafen, A. 1989. The phylogenetic regression. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 326:119-157.
20. Hansen, T. F. 1997. Stabilizing selection and the comparative analysis of adaptation. Evolution 51:1341-1351. (Pubitemid 27491132)
21. Hansen, T. F., and E. P. Martins. 1996. Translating between microevolutionary process and macroevolutionary patterns: The correlation structure of interspecific data. Evolution 50:1404-1417.
22. Harmon, L. J., and J. B. Losos. 2005. The effect of intraspecific sample size on type I and type II error rates in comparative studies. Evolution 59:2705-2710. (Pubitemid 43069950)
23. Harvey, P. H., and M. D. Pagel. 1991. The comparative method in evolutionary biology. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
24. Harville, D. A. 1974. Bayesian inference for variance components using only error contrasts. Biometrika 61:383-385.
25. Housworth, E. A., and E. P. Martins. 2001. Random sampling of constrained phylogenies: Conducting phylogenetic analyses when the phylogeny is partially known. Syst. Biol. 50:628-639.
26. Housworth, E. A., E. P. Martins, and M. Lynch. 2004. The phylogenetic mixed model. Am. Nat. 163:84-96. (Pubitemid 38231548)
27. Huelsenbeck, J. P., and B. Rannala. 2003. Detecting correlation between characters in a comparative analysis with uncertain phylogeny. Evolution 57:1237-1247. (Pubitemid 36821236)
28. Huey, R. B., B. Moreteau, J. C. Moreteau, P. Gibert, G. W. Gilchrist, A. R. Ives, T. Garland Jr., and J. R. David. 2006. Evolution of sexual size dimorphism in a Drosophila clade, the D. obscura group. Zoology 109:318-330. (Pubitemid 44572720)
29. Irschick, D. J., C. C. Austin, K. Petren, R. N. Fisher, J. B. Losos, and O. Ellers. 1996. A comparative analysis of clinging ability among pad-bearing lizards. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 59:21-35. (Pubitemid 27033360)
30. Ives, A. R., and H. C. J. Godfray. 2006. Phylogenetic analysis of trophic associations. Am. Nat. 168:E1-E14.
31. Ives, A. R., and J. Zhu. 2005. Statistics for correlated data: Phylogenies, space, and time. Ecol. Appl. 16:20-32.
32. Judge, G. G., W. E. Griffiths, R. C. Hill, H. Lutkepohl, and T.-C. Lee. 1985. The theory and practice of econometrics, 2nd edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
33. Langerhans, R. B., J. H. Knouft, and J. B. Losos. 2006. Shared and unique features of evolutionary diversification in Greater Antillean Anolis ecomorphs. Evolution 60:362-369. (Pubitemid 44804559)
34. Lynch, M. 1991. Methods for the analysis of comparative data in evolutionary biology. Evolution 45:1065-1080.
35. Martins, E. P., and T. F. Hansen. 1996. The statistical analysis of interspecific data: A review and evaluation of comparative methods. Pages 22-75 in Phylogenies and the comparative method in animal behavior (E. P. Martins, ed.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
36. Martins, E. P., and T. F. Hansen. 1997. Phylogenies and the comparative method: A general approach to incorporating phylogenetic information into the analysis of interspecific data. Am. Nat. 149:646-667; erratum 153:448.
37. Martins, E. P., and J. Lamont. 1998. Estimating ancestral states of a communicative display: A comparative study of Cyclura rock iguanas. Anim. Behav. 55:1685-1706. (Pubitemid 28333017)
38. MathWorks. 1996. Matlab, version 5.0. The MathWorks, Inc., Natick, MA.
39. Neter, J., W. Wasserman, and M. H. Kutner. 1989. Applied linear regression models. Richard D. Irwin, Homewood, Illinois.
40. Pagel, M. D., and P. H. Harvey. 1988a. How mammals produce large-brained offspring. Evolution 42:948-957. (Pubitemid 19325383)
41. Pagel, M. D., and P. H. Harvey. 1988b. The taxon-level problem in the evolution of mammalian brain size - Facts and artifacts. Am. Nat. 132:344-359. (Pubitemid 19325382)
42. Pagel, M. D., and P. H. Harvey. 1989. Taxonomic differences in the scaling of brain on body-weight among mammals. Science 244:1589-1593.
43. Paradis, E., and J. Claude. 2002. Analysis of comparative data using generalized estimating equations. J. Theor. Biol. 218:175-185. (Pubitemid 35193453)
44. Patterson, H. D., and R. Thompson. 1971. Recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Biometrika 58:545-564.
45. Purvis, A., and T. Garland, Jr. 1993. Polytomies in comparative analyses of continuous characters. Syst. Biol. 42:569-575.
46. Rayner, J. M. V. 1985. Linear relations in biomechanics: The statistics of scaling functions. J. Zool. Lond. A 206:415-439.
47. Ricklefs, R. E., and J. M. Starck. 1996. Applications of phylogenetically independent contrasts: A mixed progress report. Oikos 77:167-172. (Pubitemid 27088350)
48. Rochet, M. J., P. A. Cornillon, R. Sabatier, and D. Pontier. 2006. Comparative analysis of phylogenetic and fishing effects in life history patterns of teleost fishes. Oikos 91:255-270.
49. Rohlf, F. J. 2001. Comparative methods for the analysis of continuous variables: Geometric interpretations. Evolution 55:2143-2160. (Pubitemid 34049746)
50. Rohlf, F. J. 2006. A comment on phylogenetic correction. Evolution 60:1509-1515. (Pubitemid 44795592)
51. Smyth, G. K., and A. P. Verbyla. 1996. A conditional likelihood approach to residual maximum likelihood estimation in generalized linear models. J. R. Stat. Soc. Ser. B Methodol. 58:565-572.
52. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry, 2nd edition. W. M. Freeman & Company, New York.