Internal and external constraints in the evolution of morphological allometries in a butterfly

Evolution

Volumn 61, Issue 12, 2007, Pages 2958-2970

  Frankino, W Anthony ^a,b   Zwaan, Bas J ^a   Stern, David L ^c   Brakefield, Paul M ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b University of Houston   (United States)

^c PRINCETON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Allometry; Complex phenotype; Developmental constraint; Genetic correlation; Natural selection

Indexed keywords

ALLOMETRY; BUTTERFLY; EVOLUTION; MORPHOLOGY; NATURAL SELECTION; PHENOTYPE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BODY SIZE; BUTTERFLY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; EVOLUTION; FORELIMB; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; HISTOLOGY; PHENOTYPE;

ANIMALS; BODY SIZE; BUTTERFLIES; EVOLUTION; PHENOTYPE; SELECTION (GENETICS); VARIATION (GENETICS); WING;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 36549010877     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2007.00249.x     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. Arnold, S. J. 1992. Constraints on phenotypic evolution. Am. Nat. 140 : S85 S107.
2. Arthur, W. 2002. The interaction between developmental bias and natural selection: from centipede segments to a general hypothesis. Heredity 89 : 239 246.
3. Baker, R. H., and G. S. Wilkinson. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of sexual dimorphism and eye-span allometry in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Evolution 55 : 1373 1385.
4. Becker, W. A. 1992. Manual of quantitative genetics, the ed. Academic Enterprises, Pullman, WA.
5. Beldade, P., K. Koops, and P. M. Brakefield. 2002. Developmental constraints versus flexibility in morphological evolution. Nature 416 : 844 847.
6. Brakefield, P. M. 2007. Evo-devo and constraints on selection. Trends Ecol. Evol. 21 : 362 368
7. Brakefield, P. M., E. El Filali, R. Van Der Laan, C. J. Breuker, I. J. Saccheri, and B. J. Zwaan. 2001. J. Evol. Biol. 14 : 148 156.
8. Bohren, B. B., W. G. Hill, and A. Robertson. 1966. Some observations on asymmetrical correlated responses to selection. Genet. Res. 7 : 44 57.
9. Burger, R. 1986. Constraints for the evolution of functionally coupled characters: a nonlinear analysis of a phenotypic model. Evolution 40 : 182 193.
10. Burkhardt, D., and I. de la Motte. 1987. Physiological, behavioral, and morphometric data elucidate the evolutive significance of stalked eyes in Diopsidae (Diptera). Entomol. Gener. 12 : 221 233.
11. Carroll, S. B., J. Gates, D. N. Keys, S. W. Paddock, G. E. F. Panganiban, J. E. Selegue, and J. A. Williams. 1994. Pattern formation and eyespot determination in butterfly wings. Science 265 : 109 114.
12. Carroll, S. B., J. K. Grenier, and S. D. Weatherbee. 2001. From DNA to diversity: molecular genetics and the evolution of animal design. Blackwell Science, Malden, MA.
13. Cheverud, J. M. 1984. Quantitative genetics and developmental constraints on evolution by selection. J. Theor. Biol. 110 : 155 171.
14. Cock, A. G. 1966. Genetical aspects of metrical growth and form in animals. Q. Rev. Biol. 41 : 131 190.
15. Dudley, R. 2000. The biomechanics of insect flight: form, function, evolution. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
16. Eberhard, W. G., and E. E. Gutierrez. 1991. Male dimorphisms in beetles and earwigs and the question of developmental constraints. Evolution 45 : 18 28.
17. Emlen, D. J. 1996. Artificial selection on horn length-body size allometry in the horned beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera:Scarabaeidae). Evolution 50 : 1219 1230.
18. Emlen, D. J. 1997. Alternative reproductive tactics and male-dimorphism in the horned beetle Onthophagus acuminatus (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. Nov. 41 : 335 341.
19. Emlen, D. J., and C. E. Allen. 2004. Genotype to phenotype: physiological control of trait size and scaling in insects. Integr. Comp. Biol. 43 : 617 634.
20. Emlen, D. J., and H. F. Nijhout. 2000. The development and evolution of exaggerated morphologies in insects. Ann. Rev. Entomol. 45 : 661 708.
21. Endler, J. A. 1986. Natural selection in the wild. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
22. Falconer, D. S., and T. F. C. Mackay. 1997. Introduction to quantitative genetics. Addison Wesley Longman Limited, Essex, U.K.
23. Frankino, W. A., and R. A. Raff. 2004. Evolutionary importance and pattern of phenotypic plasticity: insights gained from development. Pp. 64 81 in T. J. DeWitt, and S. M. Scheiner, eds. Phenotypic plasticity, functional and conceptual approaches. Oxford Press, Cambridge UK.
24. Frankino, W. A., B. J. Zwaan, D. L. Stern, and P. M. Brakefield. 2005. Natural selection and developmental constraints in the evolution of allometries. Science 307 : 718 720.
25. Gromko, M. H. 1995. Unpredictability of correlated response to selection: pleiotropy and sampling interact. Evolution 49 : 685 693.
26. Gould, S. J. 1966. Allometry and size in ontogeny and phylogeny. Biol. Rev. 41 : 587 640.
27. Hansen, T. F., W. S. Ambruster, M. L. Carlson, and C. Pelabon. 2003. Evolvability and genetic constraint in Dalechampia blossoms: genetic correlations and conditional evolvability. J. Exp. Zool. 296 B : 23 39.
28. Hansen, T. F., and D. Houle. 2004. Evolvability, stabilizing selection, and the problem of stasis. Pp. 130 150 in M. Pigliucci and K. Preston, eds. Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
29. Huxley, J. S. 1932. Problems of relative growth. Methuen & Co., London.
30. Joron, M., and P. M. Brakefield. 2003. Captivity masks inbreeding effects on male mating success in butterflies. Nature 424 : 191 194.
31. Keys, D. N., D. L. Lewis, J. E. Selegue, B. J. Pearson, L. V. Goodrich, R. L. Johnson, J. Gates, M. P. Scott, and S. B. Carroll. 1999. Recruitment of a hedgehog regulatory circuit in butterfly eyespot evolution. Science 283 : 532 534.
32. Kingsolver, J. G. 1999. Experimental analyses of wing size, flight, and survival in the western white butterfly. Evolution 53 : 1479 1490.
33. Klingenberg, C. P. 2005. Developmental constraints, modules, and evolvability. Pp. 219 247 in B. Hallgrimsson, and B. K. Hall, eds. Variation. Elsevier Academic Press, Burlington, MA.
34. Klingenberg, C. P., and M. Zimmermann. 1992. Static, ontogenetic, and evolutionary allometry: a multivariate comparison in nine species of water striders. Am. Nat. 140 : 601 620.
35. Lande, R. 1979. Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain body size allometry. Evolution 33 : 402 416.
36. Lessels, C. M., and P. T. Boag. 1987. Unrepeatable repeatabilities: a common mistake. Auk 104 : 116 121.
37. Maynard Smith, J., R. Burian, S. Kauffman, P. Alberch, J. Campbell, B. Goodwin, R. Lande, D. Raup, and L. Wolpert. 1985. Developmental constraints and evolution. Q. Rev. Biol. 60 : 265 287.
38. Meagher, T. R., and D. J. Futuyma. 2001. Executive document: evolution, science, and society. Am. Nat. 158 (S1 1 45.
39. Mezey, J. G., and D. Houle. 2005. The dimensionality of genetic variation for wing shape in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 59 : 1027 1038.
40. Moczek, A. P., and D. J. Emlen. 2002. Male horn dimorphism in the scarab beetle, Onthophagus taurus: do alternative reproductive tactics favour alternative phenotypes? Anim. Behav. 59 : 459 466.
41. Moczek, A. P., J. Hunt, D. J. Emlen, and L. W. Simmons. 2002. Threshold evolution in exotic population of a polyphenic beetle. Evol. Ecol. Res. 4 : 587 601.
42. Nijhout, H. F. 1994. Insect hormones. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
43. Nijhout, H. F., and D. J. Emlen. 1998. Competition among body parts in the development and evolution of insect morphology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95 : 3685 3689.
44. Phillips, P. C., and S. J. Arnold. 1989. Visualizing multivariate selection. Evolution 43 : 1209 1222.
45. Price, T., M. Turelli, and M. Slatkin. 1993. Peak shifts produced by correlated response to selection. Evolution 47 : 280 290.
46. Rice, S. H. 1998. The evolution of canalization and the breaking of von Baer's laws: modeling the evolution of development with epistasis. Evolution 52 : 647 656.
47. Rice, S. H. 2002. A general population genetic theory for the evolution of developmental interactions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99 : 15518 15523.
48. Rice, S. H. 2004. Developmental associations between traits: covariance and beyond. Genetics 166 : 513 526.
49. Schluter, D. 1996. Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution 50 : 1766 1774.
50. Shingleton, A. W., W. A. Frankino, T. Flatt, H. F. Nijhout, and D. J. Emlen. 2007. Size and shape: the regulation of static allometry in insects. BioEssays 29 : 536 548.
51. Sinervo, B., and A. L. Basolo. 1996. Testing adaptation using phenotypic manipulations. Pp. 149 185 in M. J. Rose and G. V. Lauder, eds. Adaptation. Academic Press, San Diego, CA.
52. Sinervo, B., P. Doughty, R. B. Huey, and K. Zamudio. 1992. Allometric engineering: a causal analysis of natural selection on offspring size. Science 258 : 1927 1930.
53. Sinervo, B., and P. Licht. 1991. Proximate constraints on the evolution of egg size, egg number, and total clutch mass in lizards. Science 252 : 1300 1302.
54. Stern, D. L., and D. J. Emlen. 1999. The developmental basis of allometry in insects. Development 126 : 1091 1101.
55. Strauss, R. E. 1990. Patterns of quantitative variation in lepidopteran wing morphology: the convergent groups heliconiinae and ithomiinae (Papilionoidea: Nymphalidae). Evolution 44 : 86 103.
56. Strauss, R. E. 1992. Lepidopteran wing morphology: the multivariate analysis of size, shape, and allometric scaling. Pp. 157 179 in J. T. Sorensen, and R. Foottit, eds. Ordination in the study of morphology, evolution, and systematics of insects: applications and quantitative genetic rationales. Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam.
57. Thompson, D. W. 1917. On growth and form. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
58. Wagner, G. P. 1996. Homologues, natural kinds, and the evolution of modularity. Am. Zool. 36 : 36 43.
59. Wagner, G. P., G. Booth, and H. Bagheri-Chaichian. 1997. A population genetic theory of canalization. Evolution 51 : 329 347.
60. Weber, K. E. 1990. Selection on wing allometry in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 126 : 975 989.
61. Wickman, P. 1992. Sexual selection and butterfly design - a comparative study. Evolution 46 : 1525 1536.
62. Wilkinson, G. S. 1993. Artificial selection alters allometry in the stalk-eyed fly Cyrtodiopsis dalmanni (Diptera:Diopsidae). Genet. Res. 62 : 213 222.
63. Wilkinson, G. S., and P. R. Reillo. 1994. Female choice response to artificial selection on an exaggerated male trait in a stalk-eyed fly. Proc. Biol. Sci. 255 : 1 6.
64. Windig, J. J., P. M. Brakefield, P. M. Reitsma, and J. G. M. Wilson. 1994. Seasonal polyphenism in the wild: survey of wing patterns in five species of Bicyclus butterflies in Malawi. Ecol. Entomol. 19 : 285 298.
65. Wolf, J. B., C. E. Allen, and W. A. Frankino. 2004. Multivariate phenotypic evolution in developmental hyperspace. Pp. 366 389 in M. Pigliucci, and K. Preston, eds. Phenotypic integration: studying the ecology and evolution of complex phenotypes. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
66. Wolf, J. B., W. A. Frankino, A. F. Agrawal, E. D. Brodie III., and A. J. Moore. 2001. Developmental interactions and the constituents of quantitative variation. Evolution 55 : 232 245.
67. Zeng, Z. 1988. Long-term correlated response, interpopulation covariation, and interspecific allometry. Evolution 42 : 363 374.