Comparing G matrices: Are common principal components informative?

Genetics

Volumn 165, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 411-425

  Mezey, Jason G ^a   Houle, David ^a  

^a FLORIDA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLELE; ARTICLE; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE LOCUS; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; MODEL; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; GENETICS, POPULATION; MODELS, GENETIC; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS;

EID: 0141566651     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. ARNOLD, S. J., 1981 Behavioral variation in natural populations. I. Phenotypic, genetic and environmental correlations between chemoreceptive responses to prey in the garter snake, Thamnophis elegans. Evolution 35: 489-509.
2. ARNOLD, S. J., and P. C. PHILLIPS, 1999 Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance-covariance matrices. II. Coastal-inland divergence in the garter snake Thamnophis elegans. Evolution 53: 1516-1527.
3. ATCHLEY, W. R., D. E. COWLEY, C. VOGL and T. MCLELLAN, 1992 Evolutionary divergence, shape change and genetic correlation structure in the rodent mandible. Syst. Biol. 41: 196-221.
4. BADAYAEV, A. V., and G. E. HILL, 2000 The evolution of sexual dimorphism in the house finch. I. Population divergence in morphological covariance structure, Evolution 54: 1784-1794.
5. BONNER, J. T., 1988 The Evolution of Complexity. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
6. BRODIE, E. D., 1993 Homogeneity of the genetic variance-covariance matrix for antipredator traits in two natural populations of garter snakes Thamnophis ordinoides. Evolution 47: 844-854.
7. CAMARA, M. D., and M. PIGLIUCCI, 1999 Mutational contributions to genetic variance-covariance matrices: an experimental approach using induced mutations in Arabidopsis thaliana. Evolution 54: 1692-1703.
8. CHEVERUD, J. M., E. J. ROUTMAN and D. K. IRSCHICK, 1997 Pleiotropic effects of individual gene loci on mandibular morphology. Evolution 51: 2004-2014.
9. FLURY, B. K., 1987 Two generalizations of the common principal component method. Biometrika 74: 59-69.
10. FLURY, B. K., 1988 Common Principal Components and Related Multivariate Models. Wiley, New York.
11. HOULE, D., J. MEZEY and P. GALPERN, 2002 Interpretation of the results of common principal components analyses. Evolution 56: 433-440.
12. KOHN, L. A. P., and W. R. ATCHLEY, 1988 How similar are genetic correlation structures? Data from mice and rats. Evolution 42: 467-481.
13. LANDE, R., 1979 Quantitative genetic analysis of multivariate evolution, applied to brain:body size allometry. Evolution 33: 402-416.
14. LANDE, R., 1980 The genetic covariance between characters maintained by pleiotropic mutations. Genetics 94: 203-215.
15. LANDE, R., and S. J. ARNOLD, 1983 The measurement of selection on correlated characters. Evolution 37: 1210-1226.
16. LOFSVOLD, D., 1986 Quantitative genetics of morphological differentiation in Peromyscus. I. Tests of homogeneity of genetic covariance structure among species and subspecies. Evolution 40: 559-573.
17. LYNCH, M., and B. WALSH, 1998 Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
18. MAGWENE, P. M., 2001 New tools for studying integration and modularity. Evolution 55: 1734-1745.
19. MEZEY, M., J. M. CHEVERUD and G. P. WAGNER, 2000 Is the genotype-phenotype map modular? A statistical approach using quantitative trait loci data. Genetics 156: 305-311.
20. PAULSEN, S. M., 1996 Quantitative genetics of wing color pattern in the buckeye butterfly (Preciscoenia and Preceis evarete): evidence against the constancy of G. Evolution 50: 1585-1597.
21. PFRENDER, M. E., and M. LYNCH, 2000 Quantitative genetic variation in Daphnia: temporal changes in genetic architecture. Evolution 54: 1502-1509.
22. PHILLIPS, P. C., 1998a CPCrand: randomization test of the CPC hierarchy. University of Texas, Arlington, TX (http://darkwing. uoregon.edu/~pphil/software.html).
23. PHILLIPS, P. C., 1998b H2boot: bootstrap estimates and tests of quantitative genetic data. University of Texas, Arlington, TX (http:// darkwing.uoregon.edu/~pphil/software.html).
24. PHILLIPS, P. C., 1998c CPC: common principal components analysis. University of Texas, Arlington, TX (http://darkwing.uoregon. edu/~pphil/software.html).
25. PHILLIPS, P. C., and S. J. ARNOLD, 1999 Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance-covariance matrices. I. Using the Flury hierarchy. Evolution 53: 143-151.
26. PHILLIPS, P. C., M. C. WHITLOCK and K. FOWLER, 2001 Inbreeding changes the shape of the genetic covariance matrix in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 158: 1137-1145.
27. PODOLSKY, R. H., R. G. SHAW and F. H. SHAW, 1997 Population structure of morphological traits in Clarkia dudleyana. II. Constancy of within-population genetic variance. Evolution 51: 1795-1796.
28. PRICE, T., M. TURELLI and M. SLATKIN, 1993 Peak shifts produced by correlated response to selection. Evolution 47: 280-290.
29. RICE, S. H., 2000 The evolution of development interactions: epistasis, canalization and integration, pp. 82-98 in Epistasis and the Evolutionary Process, edited by J. B. WOLF, E. D. BRODIE and M. J. WADE. Oxford University Press, New York.
30. ROFF, D., 2000 The evolution of the G matrix: Selection or drift? Heredity, 84: 135-142.
31. ROFF, D., 2002 Comparing G matrices: a MANOVA approach. Evolution 56: 1286-1291.
32. SERVICE, P. M., 2000 The genetic structure of female life history in D. melanogaster: comparisons among populations. Genet. Res. 75: 153-166.
33. SHAW, F. H., R. G. SHAW, G. S. WILKINSON and M. TURELLI, 1995 Changes in genetic variances and covariances: G whiz! Evolution 49: 1260-1267.
34. STEPPAN, S. J., 1997 Phylogenetic analysis of phenotypic covariance structure. II. Reconstructing matrix evolution. Evolution 51: 587-594.
35. STEPPAN, S. J., P. C. PHILLIPS and D. HOULE, 2002 Comparative quantitative genetics: evolution of the G matrix. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 320-327.
36. TURELLI, M., 1988 Phenotypic evolution, constant covariances and the maintenance of additive genetic variance. Evolution 42:1342-1347.
37. WAGNER, G. P., 1989 Multivariate mutation-selection balance with constrained pleiotropy effects. Genetics 122: 223-234.
38. WAGNER, G. P., 1996 Homologues, natural kinds and the evolution of modularity. Am. Zool. 36: 36-43.
39. WAGNER, G. P., and L. ALTENBERG, 1996 Complex adaptations and the evolution of evolvability. Evolution 50: 967-976.
40. WAGNER, G. P., and J. MEZEY, 2003 The role of genetic architecture constraints for the origin of variational modularity, in Modularity in Development and Evolution, edited by G. SCHLOSSER and G. P. WAGNER. Chicago University Press, Chicago (in press).
41. WALDMANN, P., and S. ANDERSON, 2000 Comparison of genetic (co)variance matrices within and between Scabiosa canescens and S. columbria. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 826-835.
42. WILKINSON, G. S., K. FOWLER and L. PARTRIDGE, 1990 Resistance of genetic correlation structure to directional selection in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 44: 1990-2003.