The power of evo-devo to explore evolutionary constraints: Experiments with butterfly eyespots

Zoology

Volumn 106, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 283-290

  Brakefield, Paul M ^a  

^a LEIDEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Artificial selection; Development; Evolution; Generative constraints; Morphological stasis

Indexed keywords

BICYCLUS; BICYCLUS ANYNANA; DARWINIA; LEPIDOPTERA;

EID: 0347660936     PISSN: 09442006     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1078/0944-2006-00124     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Antonovics, J., and P.H. van Tienderen. 1991. Ontoecogenophyloconstraints? The chaos of constraint terminology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 6: 166-168.
2. Beldade, P., and P.M. Brakefield. 2002. The genetics and evodevo of butterfly wing patterns. Nat. Rev. Genet. 3: 442-452.
3. Beldade, P., K. Koops and P.M. Brakefield. 2002a. Developmental constraints versus flexibility in morphological evolution. Nature 416: 844-847.
4. Beldade, P., P.M. Brakefield and A.D. Long. 2002b. Contribution of Distal-less to quantitative variation in butterfly eyespots. Nature 415: 315-318.
5. Beldade, P., K. Koops and P.M. Brakefield. 2002c. Modularity, individuality, and evo-devo in butterfly wings. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 14262-14267.
6. Beldade, P. and P.M. Brakefield. 2003a. The difficulty of agreeing about constraints. Evol. Dev. 5: 119-120.
7. Beldade, P. and P.M. Brakefield. 2003b. Concerted evolution and developmental integration in modular butterfly wing patterns. Evol. Dev. 5: 169-179.
8. Brakefield, P.M. 1998. The evolution-development interface and advances with the eyespot patterns of Bicyclus butterflies. Heredity 80: 265-272.
9. Brakefield, P.M. 2003. Artificial selection and the development of ecologically relevant phenotypes. Ecology 84: 1661-1671.
10. Brakefield, P.M. and V. French. 1999. Butterfly wings: the evolution of development of colour patterns. BioEssays 21: 391-401.
11. Brakefield, P.M., V. French and B.J. Zwaan. 2003. Development and the genetics of evolutionary change within species. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34: 633-660.
12. Brakefield, P.M., J. Gates, D. Keys, F. Kesbeke, P.J. Wijngaarden, A. Monteiro, V. French and S.B. Carroll. 1996. Development, plasticity and evolution of butterfly eyespot patterns. Nature 384: 236-242.
13. Breuker, C.J. and P.M. Brakefield. 2002. Female choice depends on size but not symmetry of dorsal eyespots in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269: 1233-1239.
14. Brunetti, C.R., J.E. Selegue, A. Monteiro, V. French, P.M. Brakefield and S.B. Carroll. 2001. The generation and diversification of butterfly eyespot color patterns. Curr. Biol. 11: 1578-1585.
15. Condamin, M. 1973. Monographie du Genre Bicyclus (Lepidoptera, Satyridae). Memoires de l'Institut Fondamental d'Afrique Noire 88. Ifan-Dakar.
16. Eldredge, N., J.N. Thompson, P.M. Brakefield, S. Gavrilets, D. Jablonski, J.B.C. Jackson, R.E. Lenski, B.S. Lieberman, M.A. McPeek and W. Miller III. 2003. The dynamics of evolutionary stasis. Paleobiology: in press.
17. Fryer, G. and T.D. Iles. 1972. The Cichlid Fishes of the Great Lakes of Africa: Their Biology and Evolution. Oliver and Boyd, London.
18. Gould, S.J. 2002. The Structure of Evolutionary Theory. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
19. Gould, S.J. and R.C. Lewontin. 1979. The spandrels of San Marco and the Panglossian paradigm: a critique of the adaptationist programme. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 205: 581-598.
20. Grant, R. 2003. Evolution in Darwin's finches: a review of a study on Isla Daphne Major in the Galapagos Archipelago. Zoology 106:
21. Jackson, J.B.C. and A.H. Cheetham. 1999. Tempo and mode of speciation in the sea. TrendsEcol. Evol. 14: 72-77.
22. Lyytinen, A., P.M. Brakefield and J. Mappes. 2003. Significance of butterfly eyespots as an anti-predator device in groundbased and aerial attacks. Oikos 100: 373-379.
23. Lyytinen, A., P.M. Brakefield, L. Lindström and J. Mappes. 2003. Does predation maintain eyespot plasticity in Bicyclus anynana? Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B.: in press.
24. Maynard Smith, J., R. Burian, S. Kaufman, P. Alberch, J. Campbell, B. Goodwin, R. Lande, D. Raup and L. Wolpert. 1985. Developmental constraints and evolution. Quart. Rev. Biol. 60: 265-287.
25. McMillan, W.O., A. Monteiro and D.D. Kapan. 2002. Development and evolution on the wing. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17: 125-133.
26. Monteiro, A.F., P.M. Brakefield and V. French. 1994. The evolutionary genetics and developmental basis of wing pattern variation in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana. Evolution 48: 1147-1157.
27. Monteiro, A., P.M. Brakefield and V. French. 1997a. The genetics and development of an eyespot pattern in the butterfly Bicyclus anynana: response to selection for eyespot shape. Genetics 146: 287-294.
28. Monteiro, A., P.M. Brakefield and V. French. 1997b. Butterfly eyespots: the genetics and development of the color rings. Evolution 51: 1207-1216.
29. Monteiro, A., J. Prijs, M. Bax, T. Hakkart and P.M. Brakefield. 2003. Mutants highlight the modular control of butterfly eye-spot patterns. Evol. Dev. 5: 180-187.
30. Nijhout, H.F. 1980. Pattern formation on lepidopteran wings: determination of an eyespot. Developmental Biology 80: 267-274.
31. Nijhout, H.F. 1991. The Development and Evolution of Butterfly Wing Patterns. Smithsonian Institute Press, Washington.
32. Schlichting, C.D. and M. Pigliucci. 1998. Phenotypic Evolution, a Reaction Norm Perspective. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
33. Schluter, D. 1996. Adaptive radiation along genetic lines of least resistance. Evolution 50: 1766-1774.
34. Schwenk, K. 1995. A utilitarian approach to evolutionary constraints. Zoology 98: 251-262.
35. Stearns, S. C. 2002. Less would have been more, Evolution 56: 2339-2345.
36. Temeles, E.J. and W.J. Kress. 2003. Adaptation in a plant-hummingbird association. Science 300: 630-633.