Next Generation Prokaryotic Engineering: The CRISPR-Cas Toolkit

Trends in Biotechnology

Volumn 34, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 575-587

  Mougiakos, Ioannis ^a   Bosma, Elleke F ^a   de Vos, Willem M ^a   van Kranenburg, Richard ^a,b   van der Oost, John ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b Corbion ^*  (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Archaea; Bacteria; Cas9; CRISPR Cas; Genome editing; Recombineering

Indexed keywords

BACTERIA; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENES; MICROORGANISMS; PRODUCTION PLATFORMS; YEAST;

ARCHAEA; CAS9; EXPRESSION CONTROLS; FUNDAMENTAL RESEARCH; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; PRODUCTION PROCESS; RECOMBINEERING; TRANSCRIPTIONAL CONTROL;

METABOLIC ENGINEERING;

DOUBLE STRANDED DNA; SINGLE STRANDED DNA;

BIOENGINEERING; CRISPR CAS SYSTEM; DNA END JOINING REPAIR; DOUBLE STRANDED DNA RECOMBINEERING; GENE CONTROL; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE REPRESSION; GENETIC PROCEDURES; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; GENOME EDITING; HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; NON RECOMBINEERING BASED HOMOLOGOUS RECOMBINATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROKARYOTE; REVIEW; SINGLE STRANDED DNA RECOMBINEERING; BACTERIUM; BIOTECHNOLOGY; GENE EDITING; GENE TARGETING; GENETIC RECOMBINATION; GENETICS; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; METABOLISM; PROCEDURES;

BACTERIA; BIOTECHNOLOGY; CRISPR-CAS SYSTEMS; GENE EDITING; GENE TARGETING; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; RECOMBINATION, GENETIC;

EID: 84977839343     PISSN: 01677799     EISSN: 18793096     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tibtech.2016.02.004     Document Type: Review

References (63)

1. Barrangou R., et al. CRISPR provides acquired resistance against viruses in prokaryotes. Science 2007, 315:1709-1712.
2. Brouns S.J.J., et al. Small CRISPR RNAs guide antiviral defense in prokaryotes. Science 2008, 321:960-964.
3. van der Oost J., et al. CRISPR-based adaptive and heritable immunity in prokaryotes. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2009, 34:401-407.
4. van der Oost J., et al. Unravelling the structural and mechanistic basis of CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 12:479-492.
5. Deltcheva E., et al. CRISPR RNA maturation by trans-encoded small RNA and host factor RNase III. Nature 2011, 471:602-607.
6. Jinek M., et al. A programmable dual-RNA-guided DNA endonuclease in adaptive bacterial immunity. Science 2012, 337:816-821.
7. Samai P., et al. Co-transcriptional DNA and RNA cleavage during type III CRISPR-Cas immunity. Cell 2015, 161:1164-1174.
8. Tamulaitis G., et al. Programmable RNA shredding by the type III-A CRISPR-Cas system of Streptococcus thermophilus. Mol. Cell 2014, 56:506-517.
9. Westra E.R., et al. CRISPR immunity relies on the consecutive binding and degradation of negatively supercoiled invader DNA by Cascade and Cas3. Mol. Cell 2012, 46:595-605.
10. Makarova K.S., Koonin E.V. Annotation and classification of CRISPR-Cas systems. Methods Mol. Biol. 2015, 1311:47-75.
11. Makarova K.S., et al. An updated evolutionary classification of CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2015, 13:722-736.
12. Shmakov S., et al. Discovery and functional characterization of diverse Class 2 CRISPR-Cas systems. Mol. Cell 2015, 60:385-397.
13. Deveau H., et al. Phage response to CRISPR-encoded resistance in Streptococcus thermophilus. J. Bacteriol. 2008, 190:1390-1400.
14. Mojica F.J.M., et al. Short motif sequences determine the targets of the prokaryotic CRISPR defence system. Microbiology 2009, 155:733-740.
15. Jiang W., et al. RNA-guided editing of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nat. Biotechnol. 2013, 31:233-239.
16. Jinek M., et al. RNA-programmed genome editing in human cells. Elife 2013, 2:e00471.
17. Kim S., et al. Highly efficient RNA-guided genome editing in human cells via delivery of purified Cas9 ribonucleoproteins. Genome Res. 2014, 24:1012-1019.
18. Mali P., et al. Cas9 as a versatile tool for engineering biology. Nat. Methods 2013, 10:957-963.
19. Cong L., et al. Multiplex genome engineering using CRISPR/Cas systems. Science 2013, 339:819-823.
20. Bowater R., Doherty A.J. Making ends meet: repairing breaks in bacterial DNA by non-homologous end-joining. PLoS Genet. 2006, 2:e8.
21. Oh J-H., van Pijkeren J-P. CRISPR-Cas9-assisted recombineering in Lactobacillus reuteri. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42:e131.
22. Boyle N.R., et al. Recombineering to homogeneity: extension of multiplex recombineering to large-scale genome editing. Biotechnol. J. 2013, 8:515-522.
23. Pines G., et al. Bacterial recombineering: genome engineering via phage-based homologous recombination. ACS Synth. Biol. 2015, 4:1176-1185.
24. Pyne M.E., et al. Coupling the CRISPR/Cas9 system with lambda Red recombineering enables simplified chromosomal gene replacement in Escherichia coli. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81:5103-5114.
25. Li Y., et al. Metabolic engineering of Escherichia coli using CRISPR-Cas9 meditated genome editing. Metab. Eng. 2015, 31:13-21.
26. Reisch C.R., Prather K.L.J. The no-SCAR (Scarless Cas9 Assisted Recombineering) system for genome editing in Escherichia coli. Sci. Rep. 2015, 5:15096.
27. van Pijkeren J-P., Britton R.A. High efficiency recombineering in lactic acid bacteria. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012, 40:e76.
28. Jiang Y., et al. Multigene editing in the Escherichia coli genome via the CRISPR-Cas9 system. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81:2506-2514.
29. Xia J., et al. Expression of Shewanella frigidimarina fatty acid metabolic genes in E. coli by CRISPR/Cas9-coupled lambda Red recombineering. Biotechnol. Lett. 2016, 38:117-122.
30. Pines G., et al. Codon compression algorithms for saturation mutagenesis. ACS Synth. Biol. 2015, 4:604-614.
31. Standage-Beier K., et al. Targeted large-scale deletion of bacterial genomes using CRISPR-nickases. ACS Synth. Biol. 2015, 4:1217-1225.
32. Gasiunas G., et al. Cas9-crRNA ribonucleoprotein complex mediates specific DNA cleavage for adaptive immunity in bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:E2579-E2586.
33. Wang Y., et al. Markerless chromosomal gene deletion in Clostridium beijerinckii using CRISPR/Cas9 system. J. Biotechnol. 2015, 200:1-5.
34. Xu T., et al. Efficient genome editing in Clostridium cellulolyticum via CRISPR-Cas9 nickase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2015, 81:4423-4431.
35. Ravachol J., et al. Combining free and aggregated cellulolytic systems in the cellulosome-producing bacterium Ruminiclostridium cellulolyticum. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2015, 8:114.
36. Cobb R.E., et al. High-efficiency multiplex genome editing of Streptomyces species using an engineered CRISPR/Cas system. ACS Synth. Biol. 2014, 4:723-728.
37. Huang H., et al. One-step high-efficiency CRISPR/Cas9-mediated genome editing in Streptomyces. Acta Biochim. Biophys. Sin. 2015, 47:231-243.
38. Zeng H., et al. Highly efficient editing of the actinorhodin polyketide chain length factor gene in Streptomyces coelicolor M145 using CRISPR/Cas9-CodA(sm) combined system. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2015, 99:10575-10585.
39. Tong Y., et al. CRISPR-Cas9 based engineering of actinomycetal genomes. ACS Synth. Biol. 2015, 4:1020-1029.
40. Bikard D., et al. Programmable repression and activation of bacterial gene expression using an engineered CRISPR-Cas system. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013, 41:7429-7437.
41. Qi L.S., et al. Repurposing CRISPR as an RNA-guided platform for sequence-specific control of gene expression. Cell 2013, 152:1173-1183.
42. Ji W., et al. Specific gene repression by CRISPRi system transferred through bacterial conjugation. ACS Synth. Biol. 2014, 3:929-931.
43. Mimee M., et al. Programming a human commensal bacterium, Bacteroides thetaiotaomicron, to sense and respond to stimuli in the murine gut microbiota. Cell Syst. 2015, 1:62-71.
44. Citorik R.J., et al. Sequence-specific antimicrobials using efficiently delivered RNA-guided nucleases. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32:1141-1145.
45. Choudhary E., et al. Gene silencing by CRISPR interference in mycobacteria. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6:6267.
46. Lv L., et al. Application of CRISPRi for prokaryotic metabolic engineering involving multiple genes, a case study: controllable P(3HB-co-4HB) biosynthesis. Metab. Eng. 2015, 29:160-168.
47. Li Y., et al. Harnessing type I and type III CRISPR-Cas systems for genome editing. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, Published online October 13, 2015. 10.1093/nar/gkv1044.
48. Luo M.L., et al. Repurposing endogenous type I CRISPR-Cas systems for programmable gene repression. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43:674-681.
49. Rath D., et al. Efficient programmable gene silencing by Cascade. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015, 43:237-246.
50. Gomaa A.A., et al. Programmable removal of bacterial strains by use of genome-targeting CRISPR-Cas systems. MBio 2014, 5. e00928-00913.
51. Vercoe R.B., et al. Cytotoxic chromosomal targeting by CRISPR/Cas systems can reshape bacterial genomes and expel or remodel pathogenicity islands. PLoS Genet. 2013, 9:e1003454.
52. Aravind L., Koonin E.V. Prokaryotic homologs of the eukaryotic DNA-end-binding protein Ku, novel domains in the Ku protein and prediction of a prokaryotic double-strand break repair system. Genome Res. 2001, 11:1365-1374.
53. Wang S.T., et al. The forespore line of gene expression in Bacillus subtilis. J. Mol. Biol. 2006, 358:16-37.
54. Shuman S., Glickman M.S. Bacterial DNA repair by non-homologous end joining. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2007, 5:852-861.
55. Bikard D., et al. Exploiting CRISPR-Cas nucleases to produce sequence-specific antimicrobials. Nat. Biotechnol. 2014, 32:1146-1150.
56. Libby E.A., et al. Membrane protein expression triggers chromosomal locus repositioning in bacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:7445-7450.
57. Zetsche B., et al. Cpf1 is a single RNA-guided endonuclease of a Class 2 CRISPR-Cas system. Cell 2015, 163:759-771.
58. Sinkunas T., et al. Cas3 is a single-stranded DNA nuclease and ATP-dependent helicase in the CRISPR/Cas immune system. EMBO J. 2011, 30:1335-1342.
59. Chylinski K., et al. Classification and evolution of type II CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014, 42:6091-6105.
60. Ran F.A., et al. In vivo genome editing using Staphylococcus aureus Cas9. Nature 2015, 520:186-191.
61. Karvelis T., et al. Rapid characterization of CRISPR-Cas9 protospacer adjacent motif sequence elements. Genome Biol. 2015, 16:253.
62. Esvelt K.M., et al. Orthogonal Cas9 proteins for RNA-guided gene regulation and editing. Nat. Methods 2013, 10:1116-1121.
63. Qi L.S., Arkin A.P. A versatile framework for microbial engineering using synthetic non-coding RNAs. Nat. Rev. Microbiol. 2014, 12:341-354.