The poverty of embodied cognition

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 23, Issue 4, 2016, Pages 959-978

  Goldinger, Stephen D ^a   Papesh, Megan H ^b   Barnhart, Anthony S ^c   Hansen, Whitney A ^a   Hout, Michael C ^d  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c CARTHAGE COLLEGE   (United States)

^d NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Embodied cognition; Higher order cognition

Indexed keywords

COGNITION; EMOTION; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; THINKING;

COGNITION; EMOTIONS; HUMANS; PERCEPTION; PROBLEM SOLVING; PSYCHOLOGICAL THEORY; THINKING;

EID: 84973647720     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13423-015-0860-1     Document Type: Article

References (151)

1. Abrams, R. L., Klinger, M. R., & Greenwald, A. G. (2002). Subliminal words activate semantic categories (not automated motor responses). Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9, 100–106.
2. Abrams, R. A., Davoli, C. C., Du, F., Knapp, W. H., & Paull, D. (2008). Altered vision near the hands. Cognition, 107, 1035–1047. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.006
3. Adams, F. (2010). Embodied cognition. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 9, 619–628.
4. Allport, D. A. (1985). Distributed memory, modular subsystems and dysphasia. In S. K. Newman & R. Epstein (Eds.), Current perspectives in dysphasia (pp. 207–244). New York: Churchill Livingstone.
5. Andrews, S. (1989). Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 15, 802–814.
6. Arbib, M., Gasser, B., & Barrès, V. (2014). Language is handy but is it embodied? Neuropsychologia, 55, 57–70.
7. Babcock, M. K., & Freyd, J. J. (1988). Perception of dynamic information in static handwritten forms. The American Journal of Psychology, 101, 111–130.
8. Bahrick, H. P., Bahrick, P. O., & Wittlinger, R. P. (1975). Fifty years of memory for names and faces: A cross-sectional approach. Journal of Experiment Psychology: General, 104, 54–75.
9. Barsalou, L. W. (1983). Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition, 11, 211–227.
10. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577–609. doi:10.1017/S0140525X99532147
11. Barsalou, L. W. (2008). Grounded cognition. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 617–645. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093639
12. Becker, C. A. (1980). Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: An analysis of semantic strategies. Memory & Cognition, 8, 493–512.
13. Bhalla, M., & Proffitt, D. R. (1999). Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 25, 1076–1096.
14. Borreggine, K. L., & Kaschak, M. P. (2006). The action-sentence compatibility effect: It’s all in the timing. Cognitive Science, 30, 1097–1112. doi:10.1207/s15516709cog0000_91
15. Bub, D. N., & Masson, M. E. (2010). Grasping beer mugs: On the dynamics of alignment effects induced by handled objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(2), 341–358. doi:10.1037/a0017606
16. Buccino, G., Riggio, L., Melli, G., Binkofski, F., Gallese, V., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Listening to action-related sentences modulates the activity of the motor system: A combined TMS and behavioral study. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 355–363.
17. Chapman, S. (1968). Catching a baseball. American Journal of Physics, 36, 868–870. doi:10.1119/1.1974297
18. Chater, N., & Vitányi, P. (2003). The generalized universal law of generalization. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 47, 346–369.
19. Chemero, A. (2011). Radical embodied cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT Press.
20. Chersi, F., Thill, S., Ziemke, T., & Borghi, A. M. (2010). Sentence processing: Linking language to motor chains. Frontiers in Neurorobotics, 4(4). doi:10.3389/fnbot.2010.00004
21. Chiroro, P., & Valentine, T. (1995). An investigation of the contact hypothesis of the own-race bias in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 879–894.
22. Chomsky, N. (1959). Verbal behavior. By B. F. Skinner. Language, 35, 26–58.
23. Cohen, M. S., & Bookheimer, S. Y. (1994). Localization of brain function using magnetic resonance imaging. Trends in Neurosciences, 17, 268–277.
24. Cooper, A. N., & Shepard, R. N. (1973). The time required to prepare for a rotated stimulus. Memory & Cognition, 1, 246–250.
25. Cowan, N. (1993). Activation, attention, and short-term memory. Memory & Cognition, 21, 162–167.
26. de Vega, M., & Urrutia, M. (2011). Counterfactual sentences activate embodied meaning: An action–sentence compatibility effect study. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23(8), 962–973. doi:10.1080/20445911.2011.590471
27. de Vega, M., Moreno, V., & Castillo, D. (2013). The comprehension of action-related sentences may cause interference rather than facilitation on matching actions. Psychological Research, 77, 20–30. doi:10.1007/s00426-011-0356-1
28. Deese, J., & Kaufman, R. A. (1957). Serial effects in recall of unorganized and sequentially organized verbal material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 180–187.
29. Denke, C., Rotte, M., Heinze, H.-J., & Schaefer, M. (2014). Lying and the subsequent desire for toothpaste: Activity in the somatosensory cortex predicts embodiment of the moral-purity metaphor. Cerebral Cortex (Online first). doi:10.1093/cercor/bhu170
30. Durgin, F. H., Baird, J. A., Greenburg, M., Russell, R., Shaughnessy, K., & Waymouth, S. (2009). Who is being deceived? The experimental demands of wearing a backpack. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 964–969. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.5.964
31. Eslinger, P. J., & Grattan, L. M. (1994). Altered serial position learning after frontal lobe lesion. Neuropsychologia, 6, 729–739.
32. Farrell, S., & Lewandowsky, S. (2010). Computational models as aids to better reasoning in psychology. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 329–335.
33. Fink, P., Foo, P., & Warren, W. H. (2009). Catching fly balls in virtual reality: A critical test of the outfielder problem. Journal of Vision, 9, 1–8. doi:10.1167/9.1.14
34. Firestone, C. (2013). How “paternalistic” is spatial perception? Why wearing a heavy backpack doesn’t—and couldn’t—make hills look steeper. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 455–473.
35. Forster, K. I., & Davis, C. (1984). Repetition priming and frequency attenuation in lexical access. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 680–698.
36. Ganis, G., Keenan, J. P., Kosslyn, S. M., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2000). Transcranial magnetic stimulation of primary motor cortex affects mental rotation. Cerebral Cortex, 10, 175–180.
37. Gibson, J. J. (1966). The senses considered as perceptual systems. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
38. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
39. Glanzer, M., & Adams, J. K. (1990). The mirror effect in recognition memory: Data and theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 5–16.
40. Glenberg, A. M. (1997). What memory is for: Creating meaning in the service of action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 20, 41–50. doi:10.1017/S0140525X97470012
41. Glenberg, A. M. (2010). Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 1, 586–596. doi:10.1002/wcs.55
42. Glenberg, A. M., & Gallese, V. (2012). Action-based language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production. Cortex. doi:10.1016/j.cortex.2011.04.010
43. Glenberg, A. M., & Kaschak, M. P. (2002). Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 558–565. doi:10.3758/BF03196313
44. Glenberg, A. M., Sato, M., & Cattaneo, L. (2008a). Use-induced motor plasticity affects the processing of abstract and concrete language. Current Biology, 18, R290–R291. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.02.036
45. Glenberg, A. M., Sato, M., Cattaneo, L., Riggio, L., Palumbo, D., & Buccino, G. (2008b). Processing abstract language modulates motor system activity. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 905–919. doi:10.1080/17470210701625550
46. Glenberg, A. M., Witt, J. K., & Metcalfe, J. (2013). From the revolution to embodiment: 25 years of cognitive psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8, 573–585. doi:10.1177/1745691613498098
47. Goldinger, S. D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251–279.
48. Goldinger, S. D., He, Y., & Papesh, M. H. (2009). Deficits in cross-race face learning: Insights from eye-movements and pupillometry. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 35, 1105–1122. doi:10.1037/a0016548
49. Harm, M. W., & Seidenberg, M. S. (2004). Computing the meanings of words in reading: Cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. Psychological Review, 111, 662–720.
50. Harnad, S. (1990). The symbol grounding problem. Pysica D, 42, 335–346.
51. Hauk, O., Johnsrude, I., & Pulvermüller, F. (2004). Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex. Neuron, 41, 301–307.
52. Hebb, D. O. (1949). The organization of behavior. New York: Wiley.
53. Helsen, W. F., & Starkes, J. L. (1999). A multidimensional approach to skilled perception and performance in sport. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 13, 1–27.
54. Hintzman, D. L. (1991). Why are formal models useful in psychology? In W. E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock (pp. 39–56). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
55. Homa, D., & Cultice, J. C. (1984). Role of feedback, category size, and stimulus distortion on the acquisition and utilization of ill-defined categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 83–94.
56. Homa, D., Sterling, S., & Trepel, L. (1981). Limitations of exemplar-based generalization and the abstraction of categorical information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 7, 418–439.
57. Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (1998). Visual search has no memory. Nature, 394, 575–577.
58. Hout, M. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (2014). Target templates: The precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 77, 128–149.
59. Hull, C. (1943). Principles of behavior. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
60. Inhoff, A. W., & Rayner, K. (1986). Parafoveal word processing during eye fixations in reading: Effects of word frequency. Perception & Psychophysics, 34, 49–57.
61. Itti, L., Koch, C., & Niebur, E. (1998). A model of saliency-based visual attention for rapid scene analysis. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis & Machine Intelligence, 20, 1254–1259. doi:10.1109/34.730558
62. Jacoby, L. L., & Dallas, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306–340.
63. Jenkins, R., White, D., Van Montfort, X., & Burton, A. M. (2011). Variability in photos of the same face. Cognition, 121, 313–323.
64. Jolicoeur, P. (1985). The time to name disoriented natural objects. Memory & Cognition, 13, 289–303.
65. Kahana, M. J., & Sekuler, R. (2002). Recognizing spatial patterns: A noisy exemplar approach. Vision Research, 42, 2177–2192. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00118-9
66. Kaschak, M. P., & Borreggine, K. L. (2008). Temporal dynamics of the action-sentence compatibility effect. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 883–895. doi:10.1080/17470210701623852
67. Kelly, D. J., Quinn, P. C., Slater, A. M., Lee, K., Ge, K., & Pascalis, O. (2007). The other-race effect develops during infancy: Evidence of perceptual narrowing. Psychological Science, 18, 1084–1089. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02029.x
68. Kille, D. R., Forest, A. L., & Wood, J. V. (2013). Tall, dark, and stable: Embodiment motivates mate selection preferences. Psychological Science, 24, 112–114. doi:10.1177/0956797612457392
69. Kinoshita, S. (2006). Additive and interactive effects of word frequency and masked repetition in the lexical decision task. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 668–673. doi:10.3758/BF03193979
70. Knowlton, B. J., & Squire, L. R. (1993). The learning of categories: Parallel brain systems for item memory and category knowledge. Science, 262, 1747–1749.
71. Lewandowsky, S. (1993). The rewards and hazards of computer simulations. Psychological Science, 4, 236–243.
72. Liberman, A. M., & Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21, 1–36.
73. Liberman, A. M., Cooper, F. S., Shankweiler, D. P., & Studdert-Kennedy, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74, 431–461.
74. Lupker, S. J., & Davis, C. J. (2009). Sandwich priming: A method for overcoming the limitations of masked priming by reducing lexical competitor effects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35, 618–639. doi:10.1037/a0015278
75. Mahon, B. Z. (2015). What is embodied about cognition? Language. Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(4), 420–429.
76. Mahon, B. Z., & Caramazza, A. (2008). A critical look at the embodied cognition hypothesis and a new proposal for grounding conceptual content. Journal of Physiology, 102, 59–70. doi:10.1016/j.jphysparis.2008.03.004
77. McBeath, M. K., Shaffer, D. M., & Kaiser, M. K. (1995). How baseball outfielders determine where to run to catch fly balls. Science, 268, 569–573.
78. McCrary, J. W., & Hunter, W. S. (1953). Serial position curves in verbal learning. Science, 117, 131–134.
79. Medin, D., & Schaffer, M. (1978). Context theory of classification. Psychological Review, 85, 207–238.
80. Megreya, A. M., & Burton, A. M. (2006). Unfamiliar faces aren’t faces: Evidence from a matching task. Memory & Cognition, 34, 865–876.
81. Megreya, A. M., & Burton, A. M. (2008). Matching faces to photographs: Poor performance in eyewitness memory (without the memory). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 14, 364–372.
82. Meissner, C. A., & Brigham, J. C. (2001). Thirty years of investigating the own-race bias in memory for faces: A meta-analytic review. Psychology, Public Policy, and Law, 7, 3–35.
83. Meyer, D. E., & Schvaneveldt, R. W. (1971). Facilitation in recognizing pairs of words: Evidence of a dependence between retrieval operations. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 227–234.
84. Michel, C., Rossion, B., Han, J., Chung, S.-C., & Caldara, R. (2006). Holistic processing is finely tuned for faces of one’s own race. Psychological Science, 17, 608–615. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01752.x
85. Monaghan, J., & Ellis, A. W. (2002). What exactly interacts with spelling-sound consistency in word naming? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 183–206.
86. Monsell, S. (1978). Recency, immediate recognition memory, and reaction time. Cognitive Psychology, 10, 465–501. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(78)90008-7
87. Murdock, B. B. (1962). The serial position effect of free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 64, 482–488.
88. Murphy, G.L. (2015). Is there an exemplar theory of concepts? Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. In press.
89. Nazir, T. A., Boulenger, V., Roy, A., Silber, B., Jeannerod, M., & Paulignan, Y. (2008). Language-induced motor perturbations during the execution of a reaching movement. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61, 933–943.
90. Neely, J. H. (1977). Semantic priming and retrieval from lexical memory: Roles of inhibitionless spreading activation and limited capacity attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 106, 226–254.
91. Norris, D. (2009). Putting it all together: A unified account of word recognition and reaction-time distributions. Psychological Review, 116, 207–219. doi:10.1037/a0014259
92. Nosofsky, R. M. (1984). Choice, similarity, and the context theory of classification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 104–114.
93. Nosofsky, R. M. (1988). Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 700–708.
94. Nosofsky, R. M., Little, D. R., Donkin, C., & Fific, M. (2011). Short-term memory scanning viewed as exemplar-based categorization. Psychological Review, 118, 280–315.
95. Omohundro, J. (1981). Recognition vs. classification of ill-defined category exemplars. Memory & Cognition, 9, 324–331.
96. Papesh, M. H., & Goldinger, S. D. (2014). Infrequent identity mismatches are frequently undetected. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 76, 1335–1349.
97. Pavlov, I. (1927). Conditioned reflexes. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
98. Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., & Barsalou, L. W. (2004). Sensorimotor simulations underlie conceptual representations: Modality-specific effects of prior activation. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 164–167.
99. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C., & Zorzi, M. (2010). Beyond single syllables: Large-scale modeling of reading aloud with the connectionist dual process (CDP++) model. Cognitive Psychology, 61, 106–151. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2010.04.001
100. Pezzulo, G., Barsalou, L. W., Cangelosi, A., Fischer, M. H., McRae, K., & Spivey, M. J. (2011). The mechanics of embodiment: A dialog on embodiment and computational modeling. Frontiers in Psychology. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2011.00005
101. Polich, J., & Donchin, E. (1988). P300 and the word frequency effect. Electroencephalography & Clinical Neurophysiology, 70, 33–45.
102. Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 353–363.
103. Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1970). Retention of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 304–308.
104. Proffitt, D. R. (2006). Embodied perception and the economy of action. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1, 110–122.
105. Pulvermüller, F., Hauk, O., Nikulin, V. V., & Ilmoniemi, R. J. (2005). Functional links between motor and language systems. European Journal of Neuroscience, 21, 793–797. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03900.x
106. Ratcliff, R., & McKoon, G. (2008). The diffusion decision model: Theory and data for two-choice decision tasks. Neural Computation, 20, 873–922.
107. Reed, S. K. (1972). Pattern recognition and categorization. Cognitive Psychology, 3, 382–407. doi:10.1016/0010-0285(72)90014-X
108. Reichle, E. D., Rayner, K., & Pollatsek, A. (2003). The E-Z reader model of eye movement control in reading: Comparisons to other models. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26, 445–476.
109. Richter, W., Somorjai, R., Summers, R., & Jarmasz, M. (2000). Motor area activity during mental rotation studied by time-resolved single-trial fMRI. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 310–320.
110. Rundus, D. (1971). Analysis of rehearsal processes in free recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89, 63–77. doi:10.1037/h0031185
111. Sagan, C. (1987). The fine art of baloney detection. Parade, February 1. In press.
112. Sato, M., Mengarelli, M., Riggio, L., Gallese, V., & Buccino, G. (2008). Task related modulation of the motor system during language processing. Brain and Language, 105, 83–90. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2007.10.001
113. Saxberg, B. V. H. (1987a). Projected free fall trajectories: I. Theory and simulation. Biological Cybernetics, 56, 159–175. doi:10.1007/BF00317992
114. Saxberg, B. V. H. (1987b). Projected free fall trajectories: II. Human experiments. Biological Cybernetics, 56, 177–184. doi:10.1007/BF00317992
115. Scarborough, D., Cortese, C., & Scarborough, H. (1977). Frequency and repetition effects in lexical memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 3, 1–17.
116. Scarborough, D. L., Gerard, L., & Cortese, C. (1979). Accessing lexical memory: The transfer of word repetition effects across task and modality. Memory & Cognition, 7, 3–12.
117. Schubert, T. W., & Semin, G. R. (2009). Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39, 1135–1141. doi:10.1002/ejsp.670
118. Seidenberg, M. S., Waters, G. S., Barnes, M. A., & Tanenhaus, M. K. (1984). When does irregular spelling or pronunciation influence word recognition? Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 23, 383–404.
119. Shaffer, D. M., McManama, E., Swank, C., & Durgin, F. H. (2013). Sugar and space? Not the case: Effects of low blood glucose on slant estimation are mediated by beliefs. i-Perception, 4, 147–155. doi:10.1068/i0592
120. Shapiro, L. A. (2011). Embodied cognition. London: Routledge.
121. Shepard, R. N. (1987). Toward a universal law of generalization for psychological science. Science, 237, 1317–1323.
122. Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three dimensional objects. Science, 171, 701–703. doi:10.1126/science.171.3972.701
123. Shiffrin, R. M., & Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM—Retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 145–166.
124. Shin, H. J., & Nosofsky, R. M. (1992). Similarity scaling studies of dot pattern classification and recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121, 278–304.
125. Siakaluk, P. D., Pexman, P. M., Aguilera, L., Owen, W. J., & Sears, C. R. (2008). Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: the body-object interaction effect. Cognition, 106, 433–443.
126. Sibley, D. E., Kello, C. T., Plaut, D. C., & Elman, J. L. (2008). Large-scale modeling of wordform learning and representation. Cognitive Science, 32, 1217–1231.
127. Skinner, B. F. (1957). Verbal behavior. Acton: Copley.
128. Smith, J. D., Redford, J. S., & Haas, S. M. (2008). Prototype abstraction by monkeys (Macaca mulatti). Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 390–401.
129. Staub, A., White, S. J., Drieghe, D., Hollway, E. C., & Rayner, K. (2010). Distributional effects of word frequency on eye fixation durations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 1280–1293.
130. Sternberg, S. (1966). High speed scanning in human memory. Science, 153, 652–654.
131. Strain, E., Patterson, K., & Seidenberg, M. S. (1995). Semantic effects in single-word naming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 1140–1154.
132. Valentine, T., & Endo, M. (1992). Towards an exemplar model of face processing: The effects of race and distinctiveness. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology A: Human Experimental Psychology, 44A, 671–703.
133. Vingerhoets, G., de Lange, F. P., Vandemaele, P., Deblaere, K., & Achten, E. (2002). Motor imagery in mental rotation: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 17, 1623–1633.
134. Wagenmakers, E.-J., Steyvers, M., Raaijmakers, J. G., Shiffrin, R. M., van Rijn, H., & Zeelenberg, R. (2004). A model for evidence accumulation in the lexical decision task. Cognitive Psychology, 48, 332–367.
135. Wagenmakers, E.-J., van der Maas, H. L. J., & Farrell, S. (2012). Abstract concepts require concrete models: Why cognitive scientists have not yet embraced nonlinearly-coupled, dynamical, self-organized critical, synergistic, scale-free, exquisitely context-sensitive, interaction-dominant, multifractal, interdependent brain-body-niche systems. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4, 87–93.
136. Walton, G. E., & Bower, T. G. R. (1993). Newborns form “prototypes” in less than 1 minute. Psychological Science, 4, 203–205.
137. Wasserman, E. A., Kiedinger, R. E., & Bhatt, R. S. (1988). Conceptual behavior in pigeons: Categories, subcategories, and pseudocategories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 14, 235–246.
138. Weidler, B. J., & Abrams, R. A. (2013). Enhanced cognitive control near the hands. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 462–469. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0514-0
139. Weiskopf, D. A. (2010). Embodied cognition and linguistic comprehension. Studies In History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 41(3), 294–304. doi:10.1016/j.shpsa.2010.07.005
140. Wexler, M., Kosslyn, S. M., & Berthoz, A. (1998). Motor processes in mental rotation. Cognition, 68, 77–94. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(98)00032-8
141. Wilson, M. (2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 625–636. doi:10.3758/BF03196322
142. Wilson, A. D., & Golonka, S. (2013). Embodied cognition is not what you think it is. Frontiers in Psychology, 4(58), 1–13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00058
143. Witt, J. K. (2011). Action’s effect on perception. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20, 201–206.
144. Witt, J. K., & Proffitt, D. R. (2005). See the ball, hit the ball: Apparent ball size is correlated with batting average. Psychological Science, 16, 937–938.
145. Zacks, J. (2008). Neuroimaging studies of mental rotation: A meta-analysis and review. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1–19.
146. Zhong, C. B., & Leonardelli, G. J. (2008). Cold and lonely: Does social exclusion literally feel cold? Psychological Science, 19, 838–842.
147. Zhu, Q., & Bingham, G. P. (2008). Is hefting to perceive affordances for throwing is a smart perceptual mechanism? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 34, 929–943. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.34.4.929
148. Zhu, Q., & Bingham, G. P. (2010). Learning to perceive the affordance for long-distance throwing: Smart mechanism or function learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36, 862–875. doi:10.1037/a0018738
149. Ziegler, J. C., & Muneaux, M. (2007). Orthographic facilitation and phonological inhibition in spoken word recognition: A developmental study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 75–80.
150. Zwaan, R. A. (2014). Embodiment and language comprehension: Reframing the discussion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 18, 229–234.
151. Zwaan, R. A., & Taylor, L. J. (2006). Seeing, acting, understanding: Motor resonance in language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135, 1–11. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.135.1.1