Large-scale modeling of wordform learning and representation

Cognitive Science

Volumn 32, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 741-754

  Sibley, Daragh E ^a   Kello, Christopher T ^a   Plaut, David C ^b   Elman, Jeffrey L ^c  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Large scale connectionist modeling; Lexical processing; Orthography; Phonology; Sequence encoder; Simple recurrent network; Wordforms

Indexed keywords

EID: 45949108332     PISSN: 03640213     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03640210802066964     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Aderman, D. and Smith, E. E. (1971) Expectancy as a determinant of functional units in perceptual recognition. Cognitive Psychology, 2, pp. 117-129.
2. Andrews, S. (1989) Frequency and neighborhood effects on lexical access: Activation or search?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 15, pp. 802-814.
3. Ans, B., Carbonnel, S. and Valdois, S. (1998) A connectionist multiple-trace memory model for polysyllabic word reading. Psychological Review, 105, pp. 678-723.
4. Bailey, T. M. and Hahn, U. (2001) Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactic or lexical neighborhoods?. Journal of Memory & Language, 44, pp. 568-591.
5. Baron, J. and Thurston, I. (1973) An analysis of the word-superiority effect. Cognitive Psychology, 4, pp. 207-228.
6. Berent, I. (2001) Can connectionist models of phonology assembly account for phonology?. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, pp. 661-676.
7. Berent, I., Marcus, G. F., Shimron, J. and Gafos, A. I. (2002) The scope of linguistic generalizations: Evidence from Hebrew word formation. Cognition, 83, pp. 113-139.
8. Bishop, C. M. (1995) Neural networks for pattern recognition, Oxford University Press, Oxford, England
9. Bonte, M. L., Mitterer, H., Zellagui, N., Poelmans, H. and Blomert, L. (2005) Auditory corticial tuning to statistical regularities in phonology. Clinical Neurophysiology, 116, pp. 2765-2774.
10. Botvinick, M. and Plaut, D. C. (2006) Short-term memory for serial order: A recurrent neural network model. Psychological Review, 133, pp. 201-233.
11. Coltheart, M., Rastle, K., Perry, C., Langdon, R. and Ziegler, J. (2001) DRC: A dual route cascaded model of visual word recognition and reading aloud. Psychological Review, 108, pp. 204-256.
12. Daugherty, K. and Seidenberg, M. (1992) Rules or connections? The past tense revisited. Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 14, pp. 259-264.
13. Davis, C. J. and Bowers, J. S. (2004) What do letter migration errors reveal about letter position coding in visual word recognition?. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 30, pp. 923-941.
14. Elman, J. L. (1990) Finding structure in time. Cognitive Science., 14, pp. 179-211.
15. Harm, M. and Seidenberg, M. S. (1999) Reading acquisition, phonology, and dyslexia: Insights from a connectionist model. Psychological Review., 106, pp. 491-528.
16. Hinton, G. E., McClelland, J. L. and Rumelhart, D. E. (1986) Distributed representaions. Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, Vol. 1: Foundations, pp. 77-109. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
17. Jordan, M. I. (1986) Serial order: A parallel distributed processing approach, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA
18. Jusczyk, P. W., Friederici, A. D., Wessels, J. M. and Svenkerud, V. Y. (1993) Infants' sensitivity to the sound patterns of native language words. Journal of Memory & Language, 32, pp. 402-420.
19. Luce, R. D. (1959) Individual choice behavior, Wiley, New York
20. Marcus, M., Santorini, B. and Marcinkiewicz, M. A. (1993) Building a large annotated corpus of English: The Penn Treebank. Computational Linguistics, 19, pp. 313-330.
21. Marcus, G. F. (2001) The algebraic mind: Integrating connectionism and cognitive science, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA
22. McClelland, J. L. and Rumelhart, D. E. (1981) An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception: I. An account of basic findings. Psychological Review, 88, pp. 375-407.
23. Nosofsky, R. M. (1990) Relations between exemplar-similarity and likelihood models of classification. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 34, pp. 393-418.
24. Perry, C., Ziegler, J. C. and Zorzi, M. (2007) Nested incremental modeling in the development of computational theories: The CDP + Model of reading aloud. Psychological Review., 114, pp. 273-315.
25. Plaut, D. C., McClelland, J. L., Seidenberg, M. S. and Patterson, K. (1996) Understanding normal and impaired word reading: Computational principles in quasi-regular domains. Psychological Review, 103, pp. 56-115.
26. Pollack, J. B. (1990) Recursive distributed representations. Artificial Intelligence, 46, pp. 77-105.
27. Reicher, G. M. (1969) Perceptual recognition as a function of meaningfulness of stimulus material. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 81, pp. 275-280.
28. Rumelhart, D. E., Durbin, R., Golden, R. and Chauvin, Y. (1995) Backpropagation: The basic theory. Backpropagation: Theory, architectures, and applications, pp. 1-34. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc, Mahwah, NJ
29. Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E. and Williams, R. J. (1986) Learning representations by backpropagating errors. Nature, 323, pp. 533-536.
30. Seidenberg, M. S. and McClelland, J. L. (1989) A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming. Psychological Review, 96, pp. 523-568.
31. Vitevitch, M. S. and Luce, P. A. (1999) Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken word recognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 40, pp. 374-408.
32. Whitney, C. (2001) How the brain encodes the order of letters in a printed word: The SERIOL model and selective literature review. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, pp. 221-243.