Target templates: the precision of mental representations affects attentional guidance and decision-making in visual search

Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics

Volumn 77, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 128-149

  Hout, Michael C ^a   Goldinger, Stephen D ^b  

^a NEW MEXICO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Attentional guidance; Decision making; Eye movements; Target templates; Visual search

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION; SPATIAL MEMORY;

DECISION MAKING; EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; PERCEPTUAL MASKING; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SPATIAL MEMORY;

EID: 84911474680     PISSN: 19433921     EISSN: 1943393X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/s13414-014-0764-6     Document Type: Article

References (107)

1. Alexander, R. G., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2011). Visual similarity effects in categorical search. Journal of Vision, 11, 1–15. doi:10.1167/11.8.9
2. Al-Aidroos, N., Emrich, S. M., Ferber, S., & Pratt, J. (2012). Visual working memory supports the inhibition of previously processed information: Evidence from preview search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 643–663. doi:10.1037/a0025707
3. Alvarez, G. A., & Cavanagh, P. (2004). The capacity of visual short-term memory is set both by visual information load and by number of objects. Psychological Science, 15, 106–111. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01502006.x
4. Anderson, D. E., Vogel, E. K., & Awh, E. (2011). Precision in visual working memory reaches a stable plateau when individual item limits are exceeded. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 1128–1138. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4125-10.2011
5. Arita, J. T., Carlisle, N. B., & Woodman, G. F. (2012). Templates for rejection: Configuring attention to ignore task-relevant features. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 580–584. doi:10.1037/a0027885
6. Awh, E., Barton, B., & Vogel, E. K. (2007). Visual working memory represents a fixed number of items regardless of complexity. Psychological Science, 18, 622–628. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01949.x
7. Bays, P. M., & Husain, M. (2008). Dynamic shifts of limited working memory resources in human vision. Science, 321, 851–854. doi:10.1126/science.1158023
8. Becker, S. I. (2011). Determinants of dwell time in visual search: Similarity or perceptual difficulty? PLoS One, 6, 1–5. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017740
9. Becker, W. (1972). The control of eye movements in the saccadic system. Bibliotheca Opthalamologica, 82, 233–243.
10. Bichot, N. P., Rossi, A. F., & Desimone, R. (2005). Parallel and serial neural mechanisms for visual search in macaque area V4. Science, 308, 529–534. doi:10.1126/science.1109676
11. Bond, A. B. (1983). Visual search and selection of natural stimuli in the pigeon: The attention threshold hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 9, 292–306. doi:10.1037/0097-7403.9.3.292
12. Brady, T. F., Konkle, T., Alvarez, G. A., & Oliva, A. (2008). Visual long-term memory has a massive storage capacity for object details. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 105, 14325–14329. doi:10.1073/pnas.0803390105
13. Bravo, M. J., & Farid, H. (2009). The specificity of the search template. Journal of Vision, 9, 1–9. doi:10.1167/9.1.34
14. Bravo, M. J., & Farid, H. (2012). Task demands determine the specificity of the search template. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 74, 124–131. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0224-5
15. Buschman, T. J., Siegel, M., Roy, J. E., & Miller, E. K. (2011). Neural substrates of cognitive capacity limitations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 11252–11255. doi:10.1073/pnas.1104666108
16. Castelhano, M. S., & Henderson, J. M. (2007). Initial scene representations facilitate eye movement guidance in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33, 753–763. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.753
17. Castelhano, M. S., Pollatsek, A., & Cave, K. (2008). Typicality aids search for an unspecified target, but only in identification, and not in attentional guidance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15, 795–801. doi:10.3758/PBR.15.4.795
18. Chelazzi, L., Duncan, J., Miller, E. K., & Desimone, R. (1998). Responses of neurons in inferior temporal cortex during memory-guided visual search. Journal of Neurophysiology, 80, 2918–2940.
19. Chelazzi, L., Miller, E. K., Duncan, J., & Desimone, R. (1993). A neural basis for visual search in inferior temporal cortex. Nature, 363, 345–347. doi:10.1038/363345a0
20. Chen, X., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2006). Real-world search is dominated by top-down guidance. Vision Research, 46, 4118–4133. Real-world search is dominated by.
21. Cowan, N. (2001). The magical number 4 in short-term memory: A reconsideration of mental storage capacity. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 87–185.
22. Desimone, R., & Duncan, J. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222. doi:10.1146/annurev.ne.18.030195.001205
23. Deubel, H., Wolf, W., & Hauske, G. (1982). Corrective saccades: Effect of shifting the saccade goal. Vision Research, 22, 353–364. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(82)90151-1
24. Dowd, E. W., & Mitroff, S. R. (2013). Attentional guidance by working memory overrides saliency cues in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 39, 1786–1796. doi:10.1037/a0032548
25. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1989). Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review, 96, 433–458. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.96.3.433
26. Duncan, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (1992). Beyond the search surface: Visual search and attentional engagement. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 578–588. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.18.2.578
27. Eckstein, M. P., Beutter, B. R., Pham, B. T., Shimozaki, S. S., & Stone, L. S. (2007). Similar neural representations of the target for saccades and perception during search. Neuron, 27, 1266–1270. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3975-06.2007
28. Eimer, M., Kiss, M., & Nicholas, S. (2011). What top-down task sets do for us: An ERP study on the benefits of advance preparation in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 6, 1758–1766. doi:10.1037/a0024326
29. Einhäuser, W., Rutishauser, U., & Koch, C. (2008). Task-demands can immediately reverse the effects of sensory-driven saliency in complex visual stimuli. Journal of Vision, 8, 1–19. doi:10.1167/8.2.2
30. Ethel, M. (1974). Saccadic suppression: A review and an analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 899–917. doi:10.1037/h0037368
31. Evans, K. K., Horowitz, T. S., Howe, P., Pedersini, R., Reijnen, E., Pinto, Y., … & Wolfe, J. M. (2011). Visual attention. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science, 2, 503–514. doi: 10.1002/wcs.127
32. Findlay, J. M. (1997). Saccade target selection during visual search. Vision Research, 37, 617–631. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(96)00218-0
33. Frings, C., Wentura, D., & Wühr, P. (2012). On the fate of distractor representations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 570–575. doi:10.1037/a0027781
34. Godwin, H. J., Hout, M. C., & Menneer, T. (2014). Visual similarity is stronger than semantic similarity in guiding visual search for numbers. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 21, 689–695. doi:10.3758/s13423-013-0547-4
35. Godwin, H. J., Menneer, T., Cave, K. R., & Donnelly, N. (2010). Dual-target search for high and low prevalence X-ray threat targets. Visual Cognition, 18, 1439–1463. doi:10.1080/13506285.2010.500605
36. Goldstone, R. L., & Medin, D. L. (1994). The time course of comparison. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 29–50. doi:10.1037/0278-7393.20.1.29
37. Gorgoraptis, N., Catalao, R. F., Bays, P. M., & Husain, M. (2011). Dynamic updating of working memory resources for visual objects. Journal of Neuroscience, 31, 8502–8511. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0208-11.2011
38. Henderson, J. M., Brockmole, J. R., Castelhano, M. S., & Mack, M. (2007). Visual saliency does not account for eye movements during visual search in real world scenes. In R. P. G. van Gompel, M. H. Fischer, W. S. Murray, & R. L. Hill (Eds.), Eye movements: A window on mind and brain (pp. 537–562). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
39. Henderson, J. M., Malcolm, G. L., & Schandl, C. (2009). Searching in the dark: Cognitive relevance versus visual salience during search for non-salient objects in real-world scenes. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 16, 850–856. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.5.850
40. Hollingworth, A., & Luck, S. J. (2009). The role of visual working memory (VWM) in the control of gaze during visual search. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 71, 936–949. doi:10.3758/APP.71.4.936
41. Hollingworth, A., Richard, A. M., & Luck, S. J. (2008). Understanding the function of visual short-term memory: Transsaccadic memory, object correspondence, and gaze correction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 137, 163–181. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.137.1.163
42. Hon, N., Thompson, R., Sigala, N., & Duncan, J. (2009). Evidence for long-range feedback in target detection: Detection of semantic targets modulates activity in early visual areas. Neuropsychologia, 47, 1721–1727. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.011
43. Hout, M. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (2010). Learning in repeated visual search. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 72, 1267–1282. doi:10.3758/APP.72.5.1267
44. Hout, M. C., & Goldinger, S. D. (2012). Incidental learning speeds visual search by lowering response thresholds, not by improving efficiency. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 90–112. doi:10.1037/a0023894
45. Hout, M. C., Goldinger, S. D., & Brady, K. J. (under review). MM-MDS: A multidimensional scaling database with similarity ratings for 240 object categories from the Massive Memory picture database.
46. Hout, M. C., Goldinger, S. D., & Ferguson, R. W. (2013). The versatility of SpAM: A fast, efficient spatial method of data collection for multidimensional scaling. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 256–281. doi:10.1037/a0028860
47. Houtkamp, R., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2009). Matching of visual input to only one item at any one time. Psychological Research, 73, 317–326. doi:10.1007/s00426-008-0157-3
48. Hwang, A. D., Higgins, E. C., & Pomplun, M. (2009). A model of top-down attentional control during visual search in complex scenes. Journal of Vision, 9, 1–18. doi:10.1167/9.5.25
49. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2000). A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention. Vision Research, 40, 1489–1506. A saliency-based search mechanism for overt and covert shifts of visual attention.
50. Itti, L., & Koch, C. (2001). Computational modeling of visual attention. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2, 194–203. doi:10.1038/35058500
51. Kapoula, Z., & Robinson, D. A. (1986). Saccadic undershoot is not inevitable: Saccades can be accurate. Vision Research, 26, 735–743. doi:10.1016/0042-6989(86)90087-8
52. Koch, C., & Ullman, S. (1985). Shifts in selective visual attention: Towards the underlying neural circuitry. Human Neurobiology, 4, 219–227. doi:10.1007/978-94-009-3833-5_5
53. Konkle, T., Brady, T. F., Alvarez, G. A., & Oliva, A. (2010). Conceptual distinctiveness supports detailed visual long-term memory for real-world objects. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 139, 558–578. doi:10.1037/a0019165
54. Kunar, M. A., Flusberg, S., & Wolfe, J. M. (2008). The role of memory and restricted context in repeated visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 70, 314–328. doi:10.3758/PP.70.2.314
55. Machizawa, M. G., Goh, C. C. W., & Driver, J. (2012). Human visual short-term memory precision can be varied at will when the number of retained items is low. Psychological Science, 23, 554–559. doi:10.1177/0956797611431988
56. Malcolm, G. L., & Henderson, J. M. (2009). The effects of target template specificity on visual search in real-world scenes: Evidence from eye movements. Journal of Vision, 9, 1–13. doi:10.1167/9.11.8
57. Malcolm, G. L., & Henderson, J. M. (2010). Combining top-down processes to guide eye movements during real-world scene search. Journal of Vision, 10, 1–11. doi:10.1167/10.2.4
58. Mannan, S. K., Kennard, C., Potter, D., Pan, Y., & Soto, D. (2010). Early oculomotor capture by new onsets driven by the contents of working memory. Vision Research, 50, 1590–1597. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2010.05.015
59. Medin, D. L., Goldstone, R. L., & Gentner, D. (1993). Respects for similarity. Psychological Review, 100, 254–278. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.100.2.254
60. Menneer, T., Barrett, D. J. K., Phillips, L., Donnelly, N., & Cave, K. R. (2007). Costs in searching for two targets: Dividing search across target types could improve airport security screening. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 21, 915–932. doi:10.1002/acp.1305
61. Menneer, T., Cave, K. R., & Donnelly, N. (2009). The cost of search for multiple targets: Effects of practice and target similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 15, 125–139. doi:10.1037/a0015331
62. Menneer, T., Donnelly, N., Godwin, H. J., & Cave, K. R. (2010). High or low target prevalence increases the dual-target cost in visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 16, 133–144. doi:10.1037/a0019569
63. Moore, C. M., & Osman, A. M. (1993). Looking for two targets at the same time: One search or two? Perception & Psychophysics, 53, 381–390. doi:10.3758/BF03206781
64. Mruczek, R. E. B., & Sheinberg, D. L. (2007). Activity of inferior temporal cortical neurons predicts recognition choice behavior and recognition time during visual search. Journal of Neuroscience, 27, 2825–2836. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4102-06.2007
65. Navalpakkam, V., & Itti, L. (2005). Modeling the influence of task on attention. Vision Research, 45, 205–231.
66. Navalpakkam, V., & Itti, L. (2007). Search goal tunes visual features optimally. Neuron, 53, 605–617. doi:10.1016/j.neuron.2007.01.018
67. Neider, M. B., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2006). Searching for camouflaged targets: Effects of target-background similarity on visual search. Vision Research, 46, 2217–2235. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2006.01.006
68. Olivers, C. N., Meijer, F., & Theeuwes, J. (2006). Feature-based memory-driven attentional capture: Visual working memory content affects visual attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 1243–1265. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.5.1243
69. Olivers, C. N., Peters, J., Houtkamp, R., & Roelfsema, P. R. (2011). Different states in visual working memory: When it guides attention and when it does not. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15, 327–334. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2011.05.004
70. Palmer, E. M., Fencsik, D. E., Flusberg, S. J., Horowitz, T. S., & Wolfe, J. M. (2011). Signal detection evidence for limited capacity in visual search. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 73, 2413–2424. doi:10.3758/s13414-011-0199-2
71. Peelen, M. V., Li, F.-F., & Kastner, S. (2009). Neural mechanisms of rapid natural scene categorization in human visual cortex. Nature, 460, 94–97. doi:10.1038/nature08103
72. Pietrewicz, A. T., & Kamil, A. C. (1979). Search image formation in the blue jay (Cyanocitta cristata). Science, 204, 1332–1333. doi:10.1126/science.204.4399.1332
73. Rao, R. P., Zelinsky, G. J., Hayhoe, M. M., & Ballard, D. H. (2002). Eye movements in iconic visual search. Vision Research, 42, 1447–1463. doi:10.1016/S0042-6989(02)00040-8
74. Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-Prime User’s Guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools Inc.
75. Schmidt, J., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2009). Search guidance is proportional to the categorical specificity of a target cue. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 62, 1904–1914. doi:10.1080/17470210902853530
76. Soto, D., Hodsoll, J., Rotshein, P., & Humphreys, G. W. (2008). Automatic guidance of attention from working memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12, 342–348. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2008.05.007
77. Sternberg, S. (1966). High-speed scanning in human memory. Science, 153, 652–654.
78. Sternberg, S. (1969). Memory-scanning: Mental processes revealed by reaction-time experiments. American Scientist, 57, 421–457.
79. Sternberg, S. (1975). Memory scanning: New findings and current controversies. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 1–32. doi:10.1080/14640747508400459
80. Stokes, M., Thompson, R., Nobre, A. C., & Duncan, J. (2009). Shape-specific preparatory activitiy mediates attention to targets in human visual cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 106, 19569–19574. doi:10.1073/pnas.0905306106
81. Stroud, M. J., Menneer, T., Cave, K. R., Donnelly, N., & Rayner, K. (2011). Search for multiple targets of different colours: Misguided eye movements reveal a reduction of colour selectivity. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 25, 971–982. doi:10.1002/acp.1790
82. Tatler, B. W., & Vincent, B. T. (2008). Systematic tendencies in scene-viewing. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 2, 1–18.
83. Tatler, B. W., & Vincent, B. T. (2009). The prominence of behavioral biases in eye guidance. Visual Cognition, 17, 1029–1054. doi:10.1080/13506280902764539
84. Thiele, A., Henning, P., Kubischik, M., & Hoffman, K. P. (2002). Neural mechanisms of saccadic suppression. Science, 295, 2460–2462. doi:10.1126/science.1068788
85. Tinbergen, N. (1960). The natural control of insects in pine woods: Vol. I. Factors influencing the intensity of predation by songbirds. Archives Neelandaises de Zoologie, 13, 265–343.
86. Usher, M., & Neiber, E. (1996). Modeling the temporal dynamics of IT neurons in visual search: A mechanism for top-down selective attention. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 8, 311–327. doi:10.1162/jocn.1996.8.4.311
87. Vickery, T. J., King, L., & Jiang, Y. (2005). Setting up the target template in visual search. Journal of Vision, 5, 81–92. doi:10.1167/5.1.8
88. Vogel, E. K., McCollough, A. W., & Machizawa, M. G. (2005). Neural measures reveal individual differences in controlling access to working memory. Nature, 438, 500–503. doi:10.1038/nature04171
89. Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (1997). Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects. Psychological Review, 104, 90–122. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.1.90
90. Watson, D. G., & Humphreys, G. W. (2000). Visual marking: Evidence for inhibition using a probe-dot paradigm. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 471–481. doi:10.3758/BF03212099
91. Watson, D. G., Humphreys, G. W., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2003). Visual marking: Using time in visual selection. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 180–186. doi:10.1016/S1364-6613(03)00033-0
92. Wilschut, A., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2013). The time it takes to turn a memory into a template. Journal of Vision, 13, 1–11. doi:10.1167/13.3.8
93. Wilschut, A., Theeuwes, J., & Olivers, C. N. L. (2014). Priming and the guidance by visual and categorical templates in visual search. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1–12. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00148
94. Woodman, G. F., Luck, S. J., & Schall, J. D. (2007). The role of working memory representations in the control of attention. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 118–124. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhm065
95. Wolfe, J. M. (1994). Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 1, 202–238. doi:10.3758/BF03200774
96. Wolfe, J. M. (2005). Watching single cells pay attention. Science, 308, 503–504. doi:10.1126/science.1112616
97. Wolfe, J. M. (2007). Guided Search 4.0: Current progress with a model of visual search. In W. D. Gray (Ed.), Integrated models of cognitive systems (pp. 99–119). New York, NY, USA: Oxford University Press.
98. Wolfe, J. M., Butcher, S. J., Lee, C., & Hyle, M. (2003). Changing your mind: On the contribution of top-down and bottom-up guidance in visual search for feature singletons. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 29, 483–502. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.29.2.483
99. Wolfe, J. M., Cave, K. R., & Franzel, S. L. (1989). Guided Search: An alternative to the feature integration model for visual search. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15, 419–433. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.15.3.419
100. Wolfe, J. M., & Gancarz, G. (1996). Guided Search 3.0: A model of visual search catches up with Jay Enoch 40 years later. In V. Lakshminrayanan (Ed.), Basic and clinical applications of vision science (pp. 189–192). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.
101. Wolfe, J. M., & Horowitz, T. S. (2004). What attributes guide the deployment of visual attention and how do they do it? Nature Reviews: Neuroscience, 5, 1–7. doi:10.1038/nrn1411
102. Wolfe, J. M., Horowitz, T. S., Kenner, N., Hyle, M., & Vasan, N. (2004). How fast can you change your mind? The speed of top-down guidance in visual search. Vision Research, 44, 1411–1426. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2003.11.024
103. Yang, H., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2009). Visual search is guided to categorically-defined targets. Vision Research, 49, 2095–2103. doi:10.1016/j.visres.2009.05.017
104. Yang, H., Chen, X., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2009). A new look at novelty effects: Guiding search away from old distractors. Attention, Perception & Psychophysics, 71, 554–564. doi:10.3758/APP.71.3.554
105. Zelinsky, G. J. (2008). A theory of eye movements during target acquisition. Psychological Review, 115, 787–835. doi:10.1037/a0013118
106. Zhang, Y., Meyers, E. M., Bichot, N. P., Serre, T., Poggio, T. A., & Desimone, R. (2011). Object decoding with attention in inferior temporal cortex. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 108, 8850–8855. doi:10.1073/pnas.1100999108
107. Zhang, Y., Yang, H., Samaras, D., & Zelinsky, G. J. (2006). A computational model of eye movements during object class detection. In Y. Weiss, B. Scholkopf, & J. Platt (Eds.), Advances in neural information processing systems (Vol. 18, pp. 1609–1616). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.