Variability in photos of the same face

Cognition

Volumn 121, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 313-323

  Jenkins, Rob ^a   White, David ^b   Van Montfort, Xandra ^a   Mike Burton, A ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GLASGOW   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Attractiveness; Face perception; Face recognition; Identity; Photography

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; FACE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; INDIVIDUALITY; INTERNET; MALE; PHOTOGRAPHY; PHYSICAL ATTRACTIVENESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISION; VISUAL MEMORY;

ADULT; FACIAL EXPRESSION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL; PHOTIC STIMULATION; REACTION TIME; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY); SEX FACTORS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 80055081303     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.08.001     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Blanz, V., & Vetter, T. (1999). A morphable model for the synthesis of 3D faces. In Proceedings of the 26th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pp. 187-194.
2. Bornstein R.F. Exposure and affect: Overview and metaanalysis of research, 1968-1987. Psychological Bulletin 1989, 106:265-289.
3. Bruce V. Changing faces: Visual and non-visual coding processes in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology 1982, 73:105-116.
4. Bruce V. Stability from variation: The case of face recognition the MD Vernon memorial lecture. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1994, 47A:5-28.
5. Bruce V., Young A. Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology 1986, 77:305-327.
6. Bukach C.M., Gauthier I., Tarr M.J. Beyond faces and modularity: The power of an expertise framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2006, 10:159-166.
7. Burton, A. M., Jenkins, R., & Schweinberger, S. R. (in press). Mental representations of familiar faces. British Journal of Psychology.
8. Burton A.M., Jenkins R., Hancock P.J.B., White D. Robust representations for face recognition: The power of averages. Cognitive Psychology 2005, 51:256-284.
9. Burton A.M., White D., McNeill A. The Glasgow Face Matching Test. Behavior Research Methods 2010, 42:286-291.
10. Burton A.M., Wilson S., Cowan M., Bruce V. Face recognition in poor quality video: Evidence from security surveillance. Psychological Science 1999, 10:243-248.
11. Clutterbuck R., Johnston R.A. Exploring levels of face familiarity by using an indirect face-matching measure. Perception 2002, 31:985-994.
12. Clutterbuck R., Johnston R.A. Matching as an index of face familiarity. Visual Cognition 2004, 11:857-869.
13. Clutterbuck R., Johnston R.A. Demonstrating how unfamiliar faces become familiar using a face matching task. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 2005, 17:97-116.
14. D'Argembeau A., Van der Linden M., Comblain C., Etienne A. The effects of happy and angry expressions on identity and expression memory for unfamiliar faces. Cognition & Emotion 2003, 17:609-622.
15. Dion K., Berscheid E., Walster E. What is beautiful is good. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1972, 24:285-290.
16. Dipboye R.L., Arvey R.D., Terpstra D.E. Sex and physical attractiveness of raters and applicants as determinants of resume evaluations. Journal of Applied Psychology 1977, 4:288-294.
17. Duchaine B., Nakayama K. The Cambridge Face Memory Test: Results for neurologically intact individuals and an investigation of its validity using inverted face stimuli and prosopagnosic participants. Neuropsychologia 2006, 44:576-585.
18. Dyer A., Neumeyer C., Chittka L. Honeybee (Apis mellifera) vision can discriminate between and recognise images of human faces. Journal of Experimental Biology 2006, 208:4709-4714.
19. Endo N., Endo M., Kirita T., Maruyama K. The effects of expression on face recognition. Tohoku Psychologica Folia 1992, 52:37-44.
20. Ewing L., Rhodes G., Pellicano E. Have you got the look? Gaze direction affects facial attractiveness. Visual Cognition 2010, 18:321-330.
21. Fink B., Penton-Voak I.S. Evolutionary psychology of facial attractiveness. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2002, 11:154-158.
22. Gallegos D.R., Tranel D. Positive facial affect facilitates the identification of famous faces. Brain and Language 2005, 93:338-348.
23. Golarai G., Ghahremani D.G., Whitfield-Gabrieli S., Reiss A., Eberhardt J.L., Gabrieli J.D., et al. Differential development of high-level visual cortex correlates with category-specific recognition memory. Nature Neuroscience 2007, 10:512-522.
24. Gupta R., Srinivasan N. Emotions help memory for faces: Role of whole and parts. Cognition & Emotion 2008, 23:807-816.
25. Identity and Passport Service (2005). Guidelines for passport photographs. http://www.ips.gov.uk/cps/files/ips/live/assets/documents/photos.pdf.
26. Jenkins R., Burton A.M. 100% accuracy in automatic face recognition. Science 2008, 319:435.
27. Jenkins R., Burton A.M. Stable face representations. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 2011, 366:1671-1683.
28. Jiang F., Blanz V., O'Toole A.J. The role of familiarity in view transferability of face identity adaptation. Vision Research 2007, 47:525-531.
29. Johnston R.A., Edmonds A.J. Familiar and unfamiliar face recognition: A review. Memory 2009, 17:577-596.
30. Kampe K.K., Frith C.D., Dolan R.J., Frith U. Reward value of attractiveness and gaze. Nature 2001, 413:589.
31. Kottoor T.M. Recognition of faces by adults. Psychological Studies 1989, 34:102-105.
32. Landy D., Sigall H. Task evaluation as a function of the performer's physical attractiveness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1974, 4:299-304.
33. Leopold, O'Toole, Vetter, Blanz Prototype-referenced shape encoding revealed by high-level aftereffects. Nature Neuroscience 2001, 4:89-94.
34. McKone E., Kanwisher N., Duchaine B.C. Can generic expertise explain special processing for faces?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2007, 11:8-15.
35. Megreya A.M., Burton A.M. Unfamiliar faces are not faces: Evidence from a matching task. Memory & Cognition 2006, 34:865-876.
36. Megreya A.M., Burton A.M. Matching faces to photographs: Poor performance in eyewitness memory (without the memory). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied 2008, 14:364-372.
37. Mehl B., Buchner A. No enhanced memory for faces of cheaters. Evolution & Human Behavior 2008, 29:35-41.
38. Mehu M., Little A., Dunbar R. Sex differences in the effect of smiling on social judgments: An evolutionary approach. Journal of Social, Evolutionary, and Cultural Psychology 2008, 2:103-121.
39. Perrett D.I., Burt D.M., Penton-Voak I.S., Lee K.J., Rowland D.A., Edwards R. Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. Evolution and Human Behavior 1999, 20:295-307.
40. Perrett D.I., Lee K.J., Penton-Voak I., Rowland D., Yoshikawa S., Burt D.M., et al. Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 1998, 394:884-887.
41. Peskin M., Newell F.N. Familiarity breeds attraction: Effects of exposure on the attractiveness of typical and distinctive faces. Perception 2004, 33:147-157.
42. Redington M., Chater N. Connectionist and statistical approaches to language acquisition: A distributional perspective. Language and Cognitive Processes 1998, 13:129-191.
43. Rhodes G. The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annual Review of Psychology 2006, 57:199-226.
44. Rhodes G., Halberstadt J., Brajkovich G. Generalization of mere exposure effects in social stimuli. Social Cognition 2001, 19:57-70.
45. Rhodes G., Zebrowitz L.A., Clark A., Kalick S.M., Hightower A., McKay R. Do facial averageness and symmetry signal health?. Evolution and Human Behavior 2001, 22:31-46.
46. Roberts S.C., Havlíček J., Flegr J., Hruskova M., Little A.C., Jones B.C., et al. Female facial attractiveness increases during the fertile phase of the menstrual cycle. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B 2004, 271:270-272.
47. Russell R., Duchaine B., Nakayama K. Super-recognizers: People with extraordinary face recognition ability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 2009, 16:252-257.
48. Sansone S., Tiberghien G. Facial expression coding and face recognition: Independent or interactive processes. Psychologie Francaise 1994, 39:327-344.
49. Thornhill R., Gangestad S.W. Facial attractiveness. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1999, 3:452-460.
50. Todorov A., Said C.P., Engell A.D., Oosterhof N.N. Understanding evaluation of faces on social dimensions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2008, 12:455-460.
51. Tsukiura T., Cabeza R. Remembering beauty: Roles of orbitofrontal and hippocampal regions in successful memory encoding of attractive faces. NeuroImage 2011, 54:653-660.
52. Turati C., Bulf H., Simion F. Newborns' face recognition over changes in viewpoint. Cognition 2008, 106:1300-1321.
53. Winston J.S., Henson R.N., Fine-Goulden M.R., Dolan R.J. FMRI-adaptation reveals dissociable neural representations of identity and expression in face perception. Journal of Neurophysiology 2004, 92:1830-1839.