From the Revolution to Embodiment: 25 Years of Cognitive Psychology

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Volumn 8, Issue 5, 2013, Pages 573-585

  Glenberg, Arthur M ^a,b   Witt, Jessica K ^c   Metcalfe, Janet ^d  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^c Department of Environmental and Radiological Health Sciences   (United States)

^d Och Spine at New York Presbyterian Hospitals   (United States)

Author keywords

action; cognition; communication; language; memory; performance

Indexed keywords

EID: 84883766267     PISSN: 17456916     EISSN: 17456924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1745691613498098     Document Type: Article

References (92)

1. Anderson J. R.The adaptive character of thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum; 1990:.
2. Aravena P.,Hurtado E.,Riveros R.,Cardona J. F.,Manes F.,Ibáñez A.Applauding with closed hands: Neural signature of action-sentence compatibility effects (P. L. Gribble, Ed.).PLoS ONE. 2010;5 (7): e11751.
3. Arrighi R.,Cartocci G.,Burr D.Reduced perceptual sensitivity for biological motion in paraplegia patients.Current Biology. 2011;21:R910-R911.
4. Aziz-Zadeh L.,Wilson S. M.,Rizzolatti G.,Iacoboni M.Congruent embodied representations for visually presented actions and linguistic phrases describing actions.Current Biology. 2006;16:1818-1823.
5. Barsalou L. W.Perceptual symbol systems.Behavioral & Brain Sciences. 1999;22:577-660.
6. Beer R. D.From animals to animats 4: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Simulation of Adaptive Behavior. Maes P.Mataric M.Meyer J.Pollack J.Wilson S., ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1996:421-429.
7. Beilock S. L.,Lyons I. M.,Mattarella-Micke A.,Nusbaum H. C.,Small S. L.Sports experience changes the neural processing of action language.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA. 2008;105:13269-13272.
8. Bhalla M.,Proffitt D. R.Visual-motor recalibration in geographical slant perception.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1999;25:1076-1096.
9. Blakemore S.-J.,Frith C.Self-awareness and action.Current Opinion in Neurobiology. 2003;13:219-224.
10. Blakemore S.-J.,Wolpert D. M.,Frith C. D.Central cancellation of self-produced tickle sensation.Nature Neuroscience. 1998;1:635-640.
11. Blakemore S.-J.,Wolpert D. M.,Frith C. D.Abnormalities in the awareness of action.Trends in Cognitive Science. 2002;6:237-242.
12. Bloesch E. K.,Davoli C. C.,Roth N.,Brockmole J. R.,Abrams R. A.Watch this! Observed tool use affects perceived distance.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2012;19:177-183.
13. Brockmole J. R.,Davoli C. C.,Abrams R. A.,Witt J. K.The world within reach: Effects of hand posture and tool-use on visual cognition.Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2013;22:38-44.
14. Campos J. J.,Anderson D. I.,Barbu-Roth M. A.,Hubbard E. M.,Hertenstein M. J.,Witherington D.Travel broadens the mind.Infancy. 2000;1:149-219.
15. Casasanto D.Different bodies, different minds: The body specificity of language and thought.Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2011;20:378-383.
16. Cloutier J.,Macrae C. N.The feeling of choosing: Self-involvement and the cognitive status of things past.Consciousness and Cognition. 2008;17:125-135.
17. Collins A. M.,Quillian M. R.Retrieval time from semantic memory.Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior. 1969;8:240-247.
18. Craik F. I. M.,Moroz T. M.,Moscovitch M.,Stuss D. T.,Winocur G.,Tulving E.,Kapur S.In search of the self: A positron emission tomography.Psychological Science. 1999;10:26-34.
19. Damasio A.Self comes to mind. New York, NY: Random House; 2010:.
20. Davoli C. C.,Brockmole J. R.,Witt J. K.Compressing perceived distance with remote tool-use: Real, imagined, and remembered.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2012;38:80-89.
21. Decety J.,Lamm C.The role of the right temporoparietal junction in social interaction: How low-level computational processes contribute to meta-cognition.Neuroscientist. 2007;13:580-593.
22. Engelcamp J.Visual imagery and enactment of actions in memory.British Journal of Psychology. 1995;86:227-240.
23. Fodor J.The language of thought. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1975:.
24. Gibson J. J.The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin; 1979:.
25. Glenberg A. M.Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology.Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Cognitive Science. 2010;1:586-596.
26. Glenberg A. M.,Brown M.,Levin J. R.Enhancing comprehension in small reading groups using a manipulation strategy.Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2007;32:389-399.
27. Glenberg A. M.,Gallese V.Action-based Language: A theory of language acquisition, comprehension, and production.Cortex. 2012;48:905-922.
28. Glenberg A. M.,Gutierrez T.,Levin J. R.,Japuntich S.,Kaschak M. P.Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children's reading comprehension.Journal of Educational Psychology. 2004;96:424-436.
29. Glenberg A. M.,Willford J.,Gibson B.,Goldberg A.,Zhu X.Improving reading to improve math.Scientific Studies of Reading. 2012;16:316-340.
30. Gray R.Being selective at the plate: Processing dependence between perceptual variables relates to hitting goals and performance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. in press;:.
31. Grush R.The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception.Behavioral & Brain Sciences. 2004;27:377-442.
32. Hauk O.,Johnsrude I.,Pulvermüller F.Somatotopic representation of action words in human motor and premotor cortex.Neuron. 2004;41:301-307.
33. Hauser M. D.,Chomsky N.,Fitch W. T.The faculty of language: What is it, who has it, and how did it evolve.Science. 2002;298:1569-1579.
34. Havas D. A.,Glenberg A. M.,Gutowski K. A.,Lucarelli M. J.,Davidson R. J.Cosmetic use of botulinum toxin-A affects processing of emotional language.Psychological Science. 2010;21:895-900.
35. Held R.,Hein A.Movement-produced stimulation in the development of visually guided behavior.Journal of Comparative and Physiological Psychology. 1963;56:872-876.
36. Humphrey N.Seeing red: A study in consciousness. Boston, MA: Harvard University Press; 2006:.
37. Kintsch W.The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction-integration model.Psychological Review. 1988;95:163-182.
38. Kirsch W.,Herbort O.,Butz M. V.,Kunde W.Influence of motor planning on distance perception within the peripersonal space.PLoS ONE. 2012;7 (4): e34880.
39. Knoblich G.,Thornton I. M.,Grosjean M.,Shiffrar M.Human body perception from the inside out. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2006:.
40. Lakoff G.,Johnson M.Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 1980:.
41. Lee Y.,Lee S.,Carello C.,Turvey M. T.An archer's perceived form scales the "hitableness" of archery targets.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2012;38:1125-1131.
42. Lesage E.,Morgan B. E.,Olson A. C.,Meyer A. S.,Miall R. C.Cerebellar rTMS disrupts predictive language processing.Current Biology. 2012;22:R794-R795.
43. Lindemann O.,Bekkering H.Object manipulation and motion perception: Evidence of an influence of action planning on visual processing.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2009;35:1062-1071.
44. Linkenauger S. A.,Mohler B. J.,Bülthoff H. H. Poster presented at the 10th Annual meeting of the Vision Sciences Society; 2011Tampa, FL; 2011.
45. Linkenauger S. A.,Ramenzoni V.,Proffitt D. R.Illusory shrinkage and growth: Body-based rescaling affects the perception of size.Psychological Science. 2010;21:1318-1325.
46. Linkenauger S. A.,Witt J. K.,Proffitt D. R.Taking a hands-on approach: Apparent grasping ability scales the perception of object size.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2011;37:1432-1441.
47. Llinas R.The I of the vortex. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2001:.
48. Macrae C. N.,Moran J. M.,Heatherton T. F.,Banfield J. F.,Kelley W. M.Medial prefrontal activity predicts memory for self, Medial prefrontal activity predicts memory for self.Cerebral Cortex. 2004;14:647-654.
49. Marley S. C.,Levin J. R.,Glenberg A. M.Improving Native American children's listening comprehension through concrete representations.Contemporary Educational Psychology. 2007;32:537-550.
50. Marley S. C.,Levin J. R.,Glenberg A. M.What cognitive benefits does an activity-based reading strategy afford young Native American readers?.Journal of Experimental Education. 2010;78:395-417.
51. Marr D.Vision: A computational investigation into the human representation and processing of visual Information. San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman; 1982:.
52. McClelland J. L.,Elman J. L.The TRACE model of speech perception.Cognitive Psychology. 1986;18:1-86.
53. Metcalfe J.A composite holographic associative recall model (CHARM) and blended memories eyewitness testimony.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General. 1990;119:145-160.
54. Metcalfe Eich J.A composite holographic associative recall model.Psychological Review. 1982;89:627-661.
55. Metcalfe Eich J.Levels of processing, encoding specificity, elaboration, and CHARM.Psychological Review. 1985;91:1-38.
56. Mohler B. J.,Creem-Regehr S. H.,Thompson W. B.,Bülthoff H. H.The effect of viewing a self-avatar on distance judgments in an HMD-based virtual environment.Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments. 2010;19:230-242.
57. Murdock B. B.A theory for the storage and retrieval of associative information.Psychological Review. 1982;89:609-626.
58. Müsseler J.,Hommel B.Blindness to response-compatible stimuli.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 1997;23:861-872.
59. Nairne J. S.,Pandeirada J. N. S.Adaptive memory: Remembering with a stone-age brain.Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2008;17:239-243.
60. Newell A.,Simon H. A.Computer science as empirical enquiry.Communications of the ACM. 1976;19:113-126.
61. Osiurak F.,Morgado N.,Palluel-Germain R.Tool use and perceived distance: When unreachable becomes spontaneously reachable.Experimental Brain Research. 2012;218:331-339.
62. Palmer S. E.Vision science: From photons to phenomenology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1999:.
63. Philipona D.,O'Regan J.,Nadal J.Is there something out there? Inferring space from sensorimotor dependencies.Neural Computation. 2003;15:2029-2049.
64. Pickering M.,Garrod S.An integrated view of language production and comprehension.Behavioral & Brain Sciences. 2013;:.
65. Proffitt D. R.Embodied perception and the economy of action.Perspectives on Psychological Science. 2006;1:110-122.
66. Proffitt D. R.,Linkenauger S. A.Tutorials in action science. Prinz W.Beisert M.Herwig A., ed. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2013:171-197.
67. Reed C. L.,Betz R.,Garza J. P.,Roberts R. J.Grab it! Biased attention in functional hand and tool space.Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 2010;72:236-245.
68. Rueschemeyer S.-A.,Glenberg A. M.,Kaschak M. P.,Mueller K.,Friederici A. D.Top-down and bottom-up contributions to understanding sentences describing objects in motion.Frontiers in Psychology. 2010;1:.
69. Schubert T. W.,Semin G. R.Embodiment as a unifying perspective for psychology.European Journal of Social Psychology. 2009;39:1135-1141.
70. Searle J. R.Minds, brains, and programs.Behavioral & Brain Sciences. 1980;3:417-457.
71. Sedgwick H. A.Handbook of perception and human performance, Vol. 1: Sensory processes and perception. Boff K. L.Kaufman L.Thomas J. P., ed. New York, NY: Wiley; 1986:1-56.
72. Shapiro L.Embodied cognition. New York, NY: Routledge; 2011:.
73. Shiffrar M.,Freyd J.Apparent motion of the human body.Psychological Science. 1990;1:257-264.
74. Sugovic M.,Witt J. K.An older view of distance perception: Older adults perceive walkable extents as farther.Experimental Brain Research. in press;:.
75. Tulving E.Elements of episodic memory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 1983:.
76. Tulving E.Attention: Selection, awareness, and control: A tribute to Donald Broadbent. Baddeley A.Weiskrantz L., ed. London, England: Oxford University Press; 1993:283-299.
77. Tulving E.,Thomson D. M.Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory.Psychological Review. 1973;80:352-373.
78. Van der Hoort B.,Guterstam A.,Ehrsson H. H.Being Barbie: The size of one's own body determines the perceived size of the world.PLoS ONE. 2011;6:e20195.
79. Washburn M. F.Movement and mental imagery: Outlines of a motor theory of the complexer mental processes. Washburn M. F., ed. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin; 1916:xi-xv.
80. Wheeler M. A.,Stuss D. T.,Tulving E.Toward a theory of episodic memory: The frontal lobes and autonoetic consciousness.Psychological Bulletin. 1997;121:331-354.
81. Witt J. K.Action's effect on perception.Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2011a;20:201-206.
82. Witt J. K.Tool use influences perceived shape and parallelism: Indirect measures of perceived distance.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2011b;37:1148-1156.
83. Witt J. K.,Dorsch T.Kicking to bigger uprights: Field goal kicking performance influences perceived size.Perception. 2009;38:1328-1340.
84. Witt J. K.,Linkenauger S. A.,Bakdash J. Z.,Proffitt D. R.Putting to a bigger hole: Golf performance relates to perceived size.Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 2008;15:581-585.
85. Witt J. K.,Proffitt D. R.See the ball, hit the ball: Apparent ball size is correlated with batting average.Psychological Science. 2005;16:937-938.
86. Witt J. K.,Proffitt D. R.Action-specific influences on distance perception: A role for motor simulation.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2008;34:1479-1492.
87. Witt J. K.,Proffitt D. R.,Epstein W.Tool use affects perceived distance but only when you intend to use it.Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 2005;31:880-888.
88. Witt J. K.,Sugovic M.Performance and ease influence perceived speed.Perception. 2010;39:1341-1353.
89. Wolpert D. M.,Doya K.,Kawato M.A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2003;358:593-602.
90. Wolpert D. M.,Ghahramani Z.,Jordan M. I.An internal model for sensorimotor integration.Science. 1995;269:1880-1882.
91. Visual perception: Essential readings. Yantis S., ed. Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press; 2000:.
92. Zwaan R. A.,Taylor L. J.,De Boer M.Motor resonance as a function of narrative time: Further tests of the linguistic focus hypothesis.Brain & Language. 2010;112:143-149.