Mixed methods research for TESOL

Mixed Methods Research for TESOL

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 1-288

  Brown, James Dean ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84969706656     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Book

References (299)

1. Brown, J. D. (2001). Analyzing survey data qualitatively. In J. D. Brown, Using surveys in language programs (pp. 212-52). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Brown, J. D. (2004). Research methods for applied linguistics: Scope, characteristics, and standards. In A. Davies and C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 476-500). Oxford: Blackwell.
3. Brown, J. D., and Rodgers, T. (2002). Doing second language research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
4. Bergman, M. (Ed.). (2008). Advances in mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
5. Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
6. Creswell, J. W., and Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
7. Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Wiley.
8. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., and Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-33.
9. Plano Clark, V. L., and Creswell, J. W. (Eds.). (2008). The mixed methods reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
10. Tashakkori, A., and Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Teddlie, C., and Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches to social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Creswell, J. W., and Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Plano Clark, V. L., and Badiee, M. (2010). Research questions in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd edn) (pp. 275-304). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
14. Brown, J. D. (1988a). Understanding research in second language learning: A teacher's guide to statistics and research design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Brown, J. D. (2001a). Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. Gass, S. M., and Mackey, A. (2008). Data elicitation for second and foreign language research. New York: Routledge.
17. Brown, J. D. (1988a). Understanding research in second language learning: A teacher's guide to statistics and research design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Brown, J. D. (2001a). Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
19. Brown, J. D., and Rodgers, T. (2002). Doing second language research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
20. Dörnyei, Z. (2011). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Hatch, E., and Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle. (Unfortunately, this is out of print. However, if you can get hold of a used copy, it is an excellent book.)
22. Mackey, A., and Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. New York: Routledge.
23. Cohen, B. H. (2007). Explaining psychological statistics (3rd edn). New York: Wiley.
24. Kirk, R. E. (2008). Statistics: An introduction (5th edn). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
25. Thompson, B. (2006). Foundations of behavioral statistics: An insight-based approach. New York: Guilford.
26. Davis, K. A. (Ed.). (2011). Critical qualitative research in second language studies: Agency and advocacy. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
27. Heigham, J., and Croker, R. A. (Eds.). (2009). Qualitative research in applied linguistics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
28. Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
29. Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., and Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-74.
30. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., and Johnson, R. B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48-63.
31. American Psychological Association. (2009). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th edn). Washington, DC: Author.
32. Few, S. (2006). Information dashboard design: The effective visual communication of data. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media.
33. Huff, D., and Geis, I. (1993). How to lie with statistics. New York: Norton.
34. Nicol, A. A. M., and Pexman, P. M. (2010a). Displaying your findings: A practical guide for creating figures, posters, and presentations (6th edn). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
35. Nicol, A. A. M., and Pexman, P. M. (2010b). Presenting your findings: A practical guide for creating tables (6th edn). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
36. Tufte, E. R. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information (2nd edn). Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
37. Davis, G. B., Parker, C. A., and Straub, D. W. (2012). Writing a doctoral dissertation: A systematic approach (3rd edn). Hauppauge, NY: Barrons.
38. Graustein, J. S. (2012). How to write an exceptional thesis or dissertation: A step-by-step guide from proposal to successful defense. Ocala, FL: Atlantic Publishing Group.
39. Ogden, E. H. (2006). Complete your dissertation or thesis in two semesters or less. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.
40. Rudestam, K. E., and Newton, R. R. (2007). Surviving your dissertation: A comprehensive guide to content and process (3rd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
41. Single, P. B., and Reis, R. M. (2009). Demystifying dissertation writing: A streamlined process from choice of topic to final text. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
42. Benson, M. (1994). Writing an academic article: An editor writes . . . English Teaching Forum, 32(2), 6-9.
43. Brown, J. D. (2005b). Publishing without perishing. Journal of the African Language Teachers Association, 6, 1-16.
44. Holmes, V., and Moulton, M. (1995). A guide for prospective authors. TESOL Journal, 4(4), 31-4.
45. James, M. (1996). Getting published. Word: Newsletter of Hawai'i TESOL, 7(2), 2-3.
46. LoCastro, V. (1988). Academic writing: The author's point of view. Language Teacher, 12(13), 8-10.
47. Richards, J. C. (1988). Writing for academic journals. Language Teacher, 12(13), 5-7.
48. American Psychological Association. (2009). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th edn). Washington, DC: Author.
49. Flowerdew, J. (2001). Attitudes of journal editors to nonnative speaker contributions. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 121-50.
50. Gatson, S. N. (2011). The methods, politics, and ethics of representation in online ethnography. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th edn) (pp. 513-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
51. Kubanyiova, M. (2008). Rethinking research ethics in contemporary applied linguistics: The tension between macroethical and microethical perspectives in situated research. Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 503-18.
52. Ortega, L. (2005). For what and for whom is our research? The ethical as transformative lens in instructed SLA. Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 427-43.
53. Permissions Alert Form for APA Authors. Accessed July 14, 2012, http://www.apa.org/pubs/authors/permissions-alert.pdf.
54. Snow, C. P. (1998). The two cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
55. Alderson, J. C., and Beretta, A. (Eds.). (1992). Evaluating second language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Allwright, D., and Bailey, K. M. (1991). Focus on the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
57. Alyousef, H. S., and Picard, M. Y. (2011). Cooperative or collaborative literacy practices: Mapping metadiscourse in a business students' wiki group project. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 27(3), 463-80.
58. American Psychological Association. (1994). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (4th edn). Washington, DC: Author.
59. American Psychological Association. (2009). Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (6th edn). Washington, DC: Author.
60. Anderson, R. (2004). Intuitive inquiry: An epistemology of the heart for scientific inquiry. Humanistic Psychologist, 32(4), 307-41.
61. Bachman, L. F. (2004). Statistical analysis for language assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
62. Bachman, L. F., and Kunnan, A. J. (2005). Statistical analyses for language assessment workbook and CD ROM. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
63. Baker, A. A., and Lee, J. J. (2011). Mind the gap: Unexpected pitfalls in doing classroom research. Qualitative Report, 16(5), 1435-47.
64. Benson, M. (1994). Writing an academic article: An editor writes . . . English Teaching Forum, 32(2), 6-9.
65. Bergman, M. (Ed.). (2008). Advances in mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
66. Biber, D. (2009). A corpus-driven approach to formulaic language in English: Multi-word patterns in speech and writing. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(3), 275-311.
67. Braun, S., Kohn, K., and Mukherjee, J. (Eds.). (2006). Corpus technology and language pedagogy. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.
68. Brewer, J., and Hunter, A. (1989). Multimethod research: A synthesis of styles. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
69. Brown, H. D. (2003). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. New York: Pearson Longman ESL.
70. Brown, J. D. (1980). Relative merits of four methods for scoring cloze tests. Modern Language Journal, 64(3), 311-17.
71. Brown, J. D. (1981a). Newly placed versus continuing students: Comparing proficiency. In J. C. Fisher, M. A. Clarke, and J. Schachter (Eds.), On TESOL 1980 Building Bridges: Research and practice in teaching English as a second language. Selected papers from the 14th Annual TESOL Convention, San Francisco (pp. 111-17). Washington, DC: TESOL.
72. Brown, J. D. (1981b). An ESP testing project. English for Specific Purposes, 53, 1-3.
73. Brown, J. D. (1984). A norm-referenced engineering reading test. In A. K. Pugh and J. M. Ulijn (Eds.), Reading for professional purposes in native and foreign languages (pp. 213-22). London: Heinemann Educational.
74. Brown, J. D. (1988a). Understanding research in second language learning: A teacher's guide to statistics and research design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75. Brown, J. D. (1988b). Components of engineering-English reading ability? System, 16(2), 193-200.
76. Brown, J. D. (1989). Language program evaluation: A synthesis of existing possibilities. In K. Johnson (Ed.), The second language curriculum (pp. 222-41). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77. Brown, J. D. (1990). The use of multiple t-tests in language research. TESOL Quarterly, 24(4), 770-3.
78. Brown, J. D. (1992a). What is research? TESOL Matters, 2(5), 10.
79. Brown, J. D. (1992b). Statistics as a foreign language. Part 2: More things to look for in reading statistical language studies. TESOL Quarterly, 26(4), 629-64.
80. Brown, J. D. (1992c). The biggest problems facing ESL/EFL teachers today. TESOL Matters, 2(2), 1, 5.
81. Brown, J. D. (1992d). What roles do members want TESOL to play? TESOL Matters, 2(5), 16.
82. Brown, J. D. (1992e). What research questions interest TESOL members? TESOL Matters, 2(6), 20.
83. Brown, J. D. (1995). The elements of language curriculum: A systematic approach to program development. New York: Heinle & Heinle.
84. Brown, J. D. (1997). Designing a language study. In D. Nunan and D. Griffee (Eds.), Classroom teachers and classroom research (pp. 109-21). Tokyo: Japan Association for Language Teaching.
85. Brown, J. D. (2000). Statistics corner. Questions and answers about language testing statistics: What issues affect Likert-scale questionnaire formats? Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 4(1), 27-33. http://www.jalt.org/test/bro_7.htm
86. Brown, J. D. (2001a). Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
87. Brown, J. D. (2001b). Six types of pragmatics tests in two different contexts. In K. Rose and G. Kasper (Eds.), Pragmatics in language teaching (pp. 301-25). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
88. Brown, J. D. (2004). Research methods for applied linguistics: Scope, characteristics, and standards. In A. Davies and C. Elder (Eds.), The handbook of applied linguistics (pp. 476-500). Oxford: Blackwell.
89. Brown, J. D. (2005a). Testing in language programs: A comprehensive guide to English language assessment. New York: McGraw-Hill.
90. Brown, J. D. (2005b). Publishing without perishing. Journal of the African Language Teachers Association, 6, 1-16.
91. Brown, J. D. (2006). Second language studies: Curriculum development. In K. Brown (Ed. in Chief), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd edn) (vol. 11, pp. 102-10). Oxford: Elsevier.
92. Brown, J. D. (2007a). Statistics corner. Questions and answers about language testing statistics: Sample size and power. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 11(1), 31-5. http://www.jalt.org/test/bro_25.htm
93. Brown, J. D. (2007b). Statistics corner. Questions and answers about language testing statistics: Sample size and statistical precision. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 11(2), 21-4. http://www.jalt.org/test/bro_26.htm
94. Brown, J. D. (2008a). Testing-context analysis: Assessment is just another part of language curriculum development. Language Assessment Quarterly, 5(4), 1-38.
95. Brown, J. D. (2008b). Statistics corner. Questions and answers about language testing statistics: The Bonferroni adjustment. Shiken: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 12(1), 23-8. http://www.jalt.org/test/bro_27.htm
96. Brown, J. D. (2009). Open-response items in questionnaires. In J. Heigham and R. Croker (Eds.), Qualitative research in applied linguistics (pp. 200-19). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
97. Brown, J. D. (2011a). Quantitative research in second language studies. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Vol. 2 (pp. 190-206). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
98. Brown, J. D. (2011b). EIL curriculum development. In L. Alsagoff, S. McKay, G. W. Hu, and W. A. Renandya (Eds.), Principles and practices for teaching English as an international language (pp. 147-67). London: Routledge.
99. Brown, J. D. (2011c). Likert items and scales of measurement. SHIKEN: JALT Testing & Evaluation SIG Newsletter, 15(1) 10-14. http://www.jalt.org/test/bro_34.htm
100. Brown, J. D. (2012a). Classical test theory. In G. Fulcher and F. Davidson (Eds.), Routledge handbook of language testing (pp. 303-15). New York: Routledge.
101. Brown, J. D. (2012b). Developing, using, and analyzing rubrics in language assessment with case studies in Asian and Pacific languages. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Languages Resource Center.
102. Brown, J. D. (Ed.) (2012c). New ways in teaching connected speech. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
103. Brown, J. D. (Ed.). (2013). New ways of classroom assessment (2nd edn). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
104. Brown, J. D., and Bailey, K. M. (2008). Language testing courses: What are they in 2007? Language Testing, 25(3), 349-83.
105. Brown, J. D., Knowles, M., Murray, D., Neu, J., and Violand-Sanchez, E. (1992). The place of research within the TESOL organization. Washington, DC: TESOL (Confidential).
106. Brown, J. D., and Kondo-Brown, K. (Eds.). (2006). Perspectives on teaching connected speech to second language learners. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Languages Resource Center.
107. Brown, J. D., Robson, G., and Rosenkjar, P. (2001). Personality, motivation, anxiety, strategies, and language proficiency of Japanese students. In Z. Dörnyei and R. Schmidt (Eds.), Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 361-98). Honolulu, HI: Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawai'i Press.
108. Brown, J. D., and Rodgers, T. (2002). Doing second language research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
109. Bryant, A., and Charmaz, K. (2010). The Sage handbook of grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
110. Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
111. Burns, A. (2005). Action research. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 241-56). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
112. Burns, A. (2010). Doing action research in English language teaching: A guide for practitioners. New York: Routledge.
113. Burns, A. (2011). Action research in the field of second language teaching and learning. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning. Vol. 2 (pp. 237-53). New York and London: Routledge.
114. Campbell, D. T., and Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81-105.
115. Carr, N. T. (2008). Using Microsoft Excel to calculate descriptive statistics and create graphs. Language Assessment Quarterly, 5(1), 43-62.
116. Carr, N. T. (2011). Designing and analyzing language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
117. Chang, L. Y.-H. (2007). The influences of group processes on learners' autonomous beliefs and behaviors. System, 35, 322-37.
118. Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
119. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
120. Chase, S. E. (2011). Narrative inquiry: Still a field in the making. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th edn) (pp. 421-34). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
121. Chaudron, C. (1986). The interaction of quantitative and qualitative approaches to research: A view of the second language classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 20(4), 709-17.
122. Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
123. Chaudron, C. (2000). Contrasting approaches to classroom research: Qualitative and quantitative analysis of language use and learning. Second Language Studies, 19(1), 1-56.
124. Clandinnin, J. (Ed.). (2007). The handbook of narrative inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
125. Clark, M. K., and Ishida, S. (2005). Vocabulary knowledge differences between placed and promoted EAP students. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 4, 225-38.
126. Cobb, Tom (2000). The complete lexical tutor. http://www.lextutor.ca
127. Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling techniques (3rd edn). New York: Wiley.
128. Cohen, B. H. (2007). Explaining psychological statistics (3rd edn). New York: Wiley.
129. Collins, K. M. T. (2010). Advanced sampling designs in mixed research. In A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd edn) (pp. 353-77). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
130. Coombe, C., Stoynoff, S. J., Davidson, P. and O'Sullivan, B. (Eds.). (2012). The Cambridge guide to language assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
131. Council of Europe. (2003). Relating language examinations to the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment (CEF) [Preliminary pilot version of a proposed manual]. Strasbourg: Author.
132. Creswell, J. W. (2003, 2009). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
133. Creswell, J. W., and Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
134. Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., and Garrett, A. L. (2008). Methodological issues in conducting mixed methods research designs. In M. M. Bergman (Ed.), Advances in mixed methods research: Theories and applications (pp. 66-83). London: Sage.
135. Creswell, J. W., Plano Clark, V. L., Gutmann, M., and Hanson, W. (2003). Advanced mixed methods research designs. In A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 209-40). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
136. Cutting, J. (2007). Pragmatics and discourse: A resource book for students (2nd edn). New York and London: Routledge.
137. Davis, G. B., Parker, C. A., and Straub, D. W. (2012). Writing a doctoral dissertation: A systematic approach (3rd edn). Hauppauge, NY: Barrons.
138. Davis, K. A. (1992). Validity and reliability in qualitative research on second language acquisition and teaching: Another research comments . . . TESOL Quarterly, 26(3), 605-8.
139. Davis, K. A. (1995). Qualitative theory and methods in applied linguistics research. TESOL Quarterly, 29(3), 427-53.
140. Davis, K. A. (Ed.). (2011). Critical qualitative research in second language studies: Agency and advocacy. Charlotte, NC: Information Age.
141. Dayton, C. M. (1970). The design of educational experiments. New York: McGraw-Hill.
142. de la Cruz Villegas, L. C. E. V., and Izquierdo Sandoval, M. J. (2009a). L2 vocabulary learning through multimedia instruction on Latin/Greek etymology classes. Memorias del V Foro de Estudios en Lenguas Internacional (FEL 2009) (pp. 122-37). Universidad de Quintana Roo, Departamento de Lengua y Educacion, Quintana Roo, Mexico. http://fel.uqroo.mx/adminfile/files/memorias/Articulos_Mem_FONAEL_V/de_la_Cruz_Villegas_Veronika_&_Izquierdo_Sandoval_Jesus_Manuel.pdf
143. de la Cruz Villegas, L. C. E. V., and Izquierdo Sandoval, M. J. (2009b). Ethóks: A new Latin/Greek etymology course for EFL vocabulary development among university-level learners. Memorias del V Foro de Estudios en Lenguas Internacional (FEL 2009) (pp. 106-21). Universidad de Quintana Roo, Departamento de Lengua y Educacion, Quinana Roo, Mexico. http://fel.uqroo.mx/adminfile/files/memorias/Articulos_Mem_FONAEL_V/de_la_Cruz_Villegas_Veronika_&_Izquierdo_Sandoval_Jesus_Manuel_2.pdf
144. Denzin, N. K. (1978). The research act: A theoretical introduction to sociological methods (2nd edn). New York: McGraw-Hill.
145. Denzin, N. K., and Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
146. Deterding, D., and Kirkpatrick, A. (2006). Emerging South-East Asian Englishes and intelligibility. World Englishes, 25(3/4), 391-409.
147. Diaz-Negrillo, A. and Fernandez-Dominguez, J. (2006). Error tagging systems for learner corpora. RESLA, 19, 83-102.
148. Dörnyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research: Construction, administration, and processing. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
149. Dörnyei, Z. (2011). Research methods in applied linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
150. Dörnyei, Z., and Murphey, T. (2003). Group dynamics in the language classroom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
151. Duff, P. A. (2008). Case study research in applied linguistics. New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
152. Egbert, J. (2007). Quality analysis of journals in TESOL and applied linguistics. TESOL Quarterly, 41(1), 157-71.
153. Ehrman, M. E., and Dörnyei, Z. (1998). Interpersonal dynamics in second language education: The visible and invisible classroom. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
154. Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd edn). Harlow: Pearson ESL.
155. Few, S. (2006). Information dashboard design: The effective visual communication of data. Sebastopol, CA: O'Reilly Media.
156. Fielding, N. G., and Fielding, J. L. (1986). Linking data. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
157. Flowerdew, J. (2001). Attitudes of journal editors to nonnative speaker contributions. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 121-50.
158. Flowerdew, L. (2009). Applying corpus linguistics to pedagogy: A critical review. International Journal of Corpus Linguistics, 14(3), 393-417.
159. Flyvbjerg, B. (2011). Case study. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th edn) (pp. 301-16). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
160. Fox, J. D. (2009). Moderating top-down policy impact and supporting EAP curricular renewal: Exploring the potential of diagnostic assessment. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 8, 26-42.
161. Francis, W. N., and Kucera, H. (1982). Frequency analysis of English usage: Lexicon and grammar. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
162. Freeman, D. (1998). Doing teacher research: From inquiry to understanding. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
163. Gass, S. M., and Mackey, A. (2008). Data elicitation for second and foreign language research. New York: Routledge.
164. Gatson, S. N. (2011). The methods, politics, and ethics of representation in online ethnography. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th edn) (pp. 513-28). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
165. Gee, J. P. (2011a). An introduction to discourse analysis: Theory and method (3rd edn). New York and Abingdon: Routledge.
166. Gee, J. P. (2011b). How to do discourse analysis: A toolkit. New York and London: Routledge.
167. Glesne, C., and Peshkin, A. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction. London: Longman.
168. Glynos, J., Howarth, D., Norval, A., and Speed, E. (2009). Discourse analysis: Varieties and methods (NCRM/014). Colchester: National Centre for Research Methods. http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/796/1/discourse_analysis_NCRM_014.pdf
169. Gottlieb, M. (2006). Assessing English language learners: Bridges from language proficiency to academic achievement. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.
170. Granger, S. (2003). The International Corpus of Learner English: A new resource for foreign language learning and teaching and second language acquisition research. TESOL Quarterly, 37(3), 538-46.
171. Granger, S. (2004). Computer learner corpus research: Current state and future prospects. In U. Connor and T. Upton (Eds.), Applied corpus linguistics: A multidimensional perspective (pp. 123-45). Amsterdam: Rodopi.
172. Graustein, J. S. (2012). How to write an exceptional thesis or dissertation: A step-by-step guide from proposal to successful defense. Ocala, FL: Atlantic Publishing Group.
173. Greene, J. C. (2007). Mixed methods in social inquiry. San Francisco: Wiley.
174. Greene, J. C., Caracelli, V. J., and Graham, W. F. (1989). Toward a conceptual framework for mixed-method evaluation designs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 11, 255-74.
175. Grotjahn, R. (1987). On the methodological basis of introspective methods. In C. Faerch and G. Kasper (Eds.), Introspection in second language research (pp. 59-60). Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
176. Hamera, B. (2011). Performance ethnography. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th edn) (pp. 317-30). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
177. Hargrove, S. B. (2010). Training to improve the reading skills of middle school English language learners. TNTESOL Journal, 3, 8-21. http://tntesol.org/tntesol_journal_2010_final.pdf
178. Hashemi, M. R. (2012). Reflections on mixing methods in applied linguistics research. Applied Linguistics, 33(2), 206-12.
179. Hashemi, M. R., and Babaii, E. (2013). Mixed methods research: Toward new research designs in applied linguistics. Modern Language Journal, 97(4), 828-852.
180. Hatch, E., and Lazaraton, A. (1991). The research manual: Design and statistics for applied linguistics. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
181. Heigham, J., and Croker, R. A. (Eds.). (2009). Qualitative research in applied linguistics. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
182. Hobbs, V., and Kubanyiova, M. (2008). The challenges of researching language teachers: What research manuals don't tell us. Language Teaching Research, 12, 495-513.
183. Holmes, V., and Moulton, M. (1995). A guide for prospective authors. TESOL Journal, 4(4), 31-4.
184. Huberman, A. M., and Miles, M. B. (1994). Data management and analysis methods. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 428-44). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
185. Huff, D., and Geis, I. (1993). How to lie with statistics. New York: Norton.
186. Hyland, K. (2005). Metadiscourse: Exploring interaction in writing. London: Continuum.
187. Hyland, K. (2010). Metadiscourse: Mapping interactions in academic writing. Nordic Journal of English Studies, Special Issue: Metadiscourse, 9(2), 125-43.
188. Hyland, K., and Tse, P. (2004). Metadiscourses in academic writing: A reappraisal. Applied Linguistics, 25(2), 156-77.
189. James, M. (1996). Getting published. Word: Newsletter of Hawai'i TESOL, 7(2), 2-3.
190. Janesick, V. J. (1994). The dance of qualitative research design: Metaphor, methodolatory and meaning. In M. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), A handbook of qualitative research (pp. 209-19). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
191. Jang, E. E. (2005). A validity narrative: Effects of reading skills diagnosis on teaching and learning in the context of NG TOEFL. Unpublished doctoral dissertation: University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
192. Jenkins, J. (2004). Research in teaching pronunciation and intonation. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 109-25.
193. Jenkins, J. (2009). English as a lingua franca: Interpretations and attitudes. World Englishes, 28(2), 200-7.
194. Jick, T. D. (1979) Mixing qualitative and quantitative methods: Triangulation in action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 24, 602-11.
195. Johnson, R. B., and Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed methods research: A research paradigm whose time has come. Educational Researcher, 33(7), 14-26.
196. Johnson, R. B., Onwuegbuzie, A. J., and Turner, L. A. (2007). Toward a definition of mixed methods research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(2), 112-33.
197. Johnson, R. B., and Turner, L. A. (2003). Data collection strategies in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 297-319). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
198. Johnstone, B. (2007). Discourse analysis (2nd edn). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
199. Kalton, G. (1983). Introduction to survey sampling. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
200. Karin, A. (2009). Corpora and language teaching. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
201. Kemper, E., Stringfield, S., and Teddlie, C. (2003). Mixed methods sampling strategies in social science research. In A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 273-96). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
202. Khalifa, H., and Schmitt, N. (2010). A mixed-method approach towards investigating lexical progression in Main Suite Reading test papers. Cambridge ESOL: Research Notes, 41, 19-25.
203. Kimmel, A. J. (1988). Ethics and values in applied social research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
204. Kirk, R. E. (1968). Experimental design: Procedures for behavioral sciences. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth.
205. Kirk, R. E. (2008). Statistics: An introduction (5th edn). Belmont, CA: Thomson Wadsworth.
206. Kirkpatrick, A., Deterding, D., and Wong, J. (2008). The international intelligibility of Hong Kong English. World Englishes, 27(3/4), 359-77.
207. Kletzien, J. A. (2011). On the merits of mixing methods: A language program evaluation. Second Language Studies, 30(1), 49-94. http://www.hawaii.edu/sls/sls/?page_id=135
208. Kubanyiova, M. (2008). Rethinking research ethics in contemporary applied linguistics: The tension between macroethical and microethical perspectives in situated research. Modern Language Journal, 92(4), 503-18.
209. Lanteigne, B. (2006). Regionally specific tasks of non-western English language use. TESL-EJ, 10(2), 1-19.
210. Lazaraton, A. (1995). Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A progress report. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 455-72.
211. Lazaraton, A. (2005). Quantitative research methods. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 209-24). New York: Routledge.
212. Levy, P. S., and Lemeshow, S. (1999). Sampling of populations: Methods and applications. New York: Wiley.
213. Lewins, A., and Silver, C. (2007) Using software in qualitative research: A step-by-step guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
214. LoCastro, V. (1988). Academic writing: The author's point of view. Language Teacher, 12(13), 8-10.
215. Lynch, B. (1992). Evaluating a program inside and out. In J. C. Alderson and A. Beretta (Eds.), Evaluating second language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
216. Lynch, B. K. (1997). Language program evaluation: Theory and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
217. Mackey, A., and Gass, S. M. (2005). Second language research: Methodology and design. New York: Routledge.
218. Marshall, C., and Rossman, G. B. (2011). Designing qualitative research (5th edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
219. Mauranen, A. (2003). The corpus of English as lingua franca in academic settings. TESOL Quarterly, 37(3), 513-27.
220. McCall, G., and Simmons, J. (1969). Issues in participant observation. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
221. McDonough, K. (2006). Action research and the professional development of graduate teaching assistants. Modern Language Journal, 90, 33-47.
222. McKay, S. L. (2006). Researching second language classrooms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
223. McNiff, J., and Whitehead, J. (2011). All you need to know about action research (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
224. Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in education and psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
225. Miles, M. B., and Huberman, A. M. (1984). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
226. Miller, M., and Hegelheimer, V. (2006). The SIMS meet ESL: Incorporating authentic computer simulation games into the language classroom. Technology and Smart Education, 3(4), 311-28.
227. Miyazoe, T., and Anderson, T. (2011). Anonymity in blended learning: Who would you like to be? Educational Technology & Society, 14(2), 175-87.
228. Newman, I., and Benz, C. R. (1998). Qualitative-quantitative research methodology: Exploring the interactive continuum. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press.
229. Nicol, A. A. M., and Pexman, P. M. (2010a). Displaying your findings: A practical guide for creating figures, posters, and presentations (6th edn). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
230. Nicol, A. A. M., and Pexman, P. M. (2010b). Presenting your findings: A practical guide for creating tables (6th edn). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
231. Norris, J. M., Davis, J. M., Sinicrope, C., and Watanabe, Y. (Eds.). (2009). Toward useful program evaluation in college foreign language education. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center, University of Hawai'i at Mānoa.
232. Nunan, D. (1991). Methods in second language classroom-oriented research: A critical review. SSLA, 13, 249-74.
233. Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
234. Nunan, D., and Bailey, K. M. (2009). Exploring second language classroom research: A comprehensive guide. Boston, MA: Heinle Education.
235. O'Bryan, A., and Hegelheimer, V. (2009). Using a mixed methods approach to explore strategies, metacognitive awareness and the effects of task design on listening development. Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 12(1), 9-38.
236. Ogden, E. H. (2006). Complete your dissertation or thesis in two semesters or less. Plymouth: Rowman & Littlefield.
237. O'Keeffe, A., McCarthy, M., and Carter, R. (2007). From corpus to classroom: Language use and language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
238. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., and Johnson, R. B. (2006). The validity issue in mixed research. Research in the Schools, 13(1), 48-63.
239. Onwuegbuzie, A. J., and Leech, N. L. (2007). Validity and qualitative research: An oxymoron? Quality and Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, 41, 233-49.
240. Ortega, L. (2005). For what and for whom is our research? The ethical as transformative lens in instructed SLA. Modern Language Journal, 89(3), 427-43.
241. Patton, M. Q. (1980). Qualitative evaluation methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
242. Patton, M. Q. (2008). Utilization-focused evaluation (4th edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
243. Phuong, L. L. T. (2011). Adopting CALL to promote listening skills for EFL learners in Vietnamese universities. In Proceedings of the International Conference "ICT for Language Learning" (4th edn). http://www.pixel-online.net/ICT4LL2011/common/download/Paper_pdf/IBL26-175-FP-Phuong-ICT4LL2011.pdf
244. Pica, T. (2005). Classroom learning, teaching, and research: A task-based perspective. Modern Language Journal, 89, 339-52.
245. Pierce, S. (2012). Utilization-focused evaluation for program development: Investigating the need for teaching experience within the Bachelor of Arts Program in Second Language Studies. Second Language Studies, 30(2), 43-107. http://www.hawaii.edu/sls/sls/?page_id=135
246. Plakans, L., and Gebril, A. (2012). A close investigation into source use in integrated second language writing tasks. Assessing Writing, 17, 18-34.
247. Plano Clark, V. L., and Badiee, M. (2010). Research questions in mixed methods research. In A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie (Eds.), Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd edn) (pp. 275-304). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
248. Plano Clark, V. L., and Creswell, J. W. (Eds.). (2008). The mixed methods reader. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
249. Polio, C. (1996). Issues and problems in reporting classroom research. In J. Schachter and S. Gass (Eds.), Second language classroom research: Issues and opportunities (pp. 61-79). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
250. Porte, G. (Ed.). (2012). Replication research in applied linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
251. Ranalli, J. (2008). Learning English with The Sims: Exploiting authentic computer simulation games for L2 learning. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(5), 441-55.
252. Reason, P., and Bradbury-Huang, H. (2007). Sage handbook of action research: Participative inquiry and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
253. Reichardt, C., and Cook, T. (1979). Beyond qualitative versus quantitative methods. In T. Cook and C. Reichardt (Eds.), Qualitative and quantitative methods in education research (pp. 7-32). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
254. Richards, J. C. (1988). Writing for academic journals. Language Teacher, 12(13), 5-7.
255. Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
256. Rogers, R. (Ed.). (2011). An introduction to critical discourse analysis in education (2nd edn). New York: Routledge.
257. Rossiter, M. J. (2001). The challenges of classroom-based SLA research. Applied Language Learning, 12(1), 31-44.
258. Rossman, G. B., and Wilson, B. L. (1985). Numbers and words combining quantitative and qualitative methods in a single large-scale evaluation study. Evaluation Review, 9(5), 627-43.
259. Rudestam, K. E., and Newton, R. R. (2007). Surviving your dissertation: A comprehensive guide to content and process (3rd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
260. Saldana, J. (2011). The coding manual for qualitative researchers. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
261. Schachter, J., and Gass, S. M. (1996). Second language classroom research: Issues and opportunities. New York: Routledge.
262. Schwandt, T. A. (2007). The Sage dictionary of qualitative inquiry (3rd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
263. Seidlhofer, B. (2001). Closing a conceptual gap: The case for the description of English as a lingua franca. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 133-58.
264. Seidlhofer, B. (2005). English as a lingua franca. In Oxford advanced learner's dictionary of current English (7th edn) (p. R 92). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
265. Seliger, J., and Long, M. H. (Eds.). (1983). Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
266. Sewell, A. (2010). Research methods and intelligibility studies. World Englishes, 29(2), 257-69.
267. Shavelson, R. J. (1981). Statistical reasoning for the behavioral sciences. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
268. Sifakis, N. C., and Sougari, A.-M. (2005). Pronunciation issues and EIL pedagogy in the periphery: A survey of Greek state school teachers' beliefs. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 467-88.
269. Simpson-Vlach, R., and Ellis, N. C. (2010). An academic formulas list: New methods in phraseology research. Applied Linguistics, 31(4), 487-512.
270. Single, P. B., and Reis, R. M. (2009). Demystifying dissertation writing: A streamlined process from choice of topic to final text. Sterling, VA: Stylus.
271. Smith, J. A., Flowers, P., and Larkin, M. (2009). Interpretive phenomenological analysis: Theory, method, and practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
272. Snow, C. P. (1959). The Rede lecture, 1959. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. http://s-f-walker.org.uk/pubsebooks/2cultures/Rede-lecture-2-cultures.pdf
273. Snow, C. P. (1998). The two cultures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
274. Spada, N. (2005). Conditions and challenges in developing school-based SLA research programs. Modern Language Journal, 89, 328-38.
275. SPSS. (2012). IBM SPSS 19. Armonk, NY: International Business Machines.
276. Strauss, A., and Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
277. Stringer, E.T. (2007). Action research (3rd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
278. SYSTAT. (2012). SYSTAT 13. Chicago, IL: Systat Software.
279. Tabachnick, B. G., and Fidell, L. S. (2012). Using multivariate statistics (6th edn). Boston, MA: Pearson.
280. Tashakkori, A., and Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology: Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
281. Tashakkori, A., and Teddlie, C. (Eds.). (2010). Sage handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (2nd edn). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
282. Teddlie, C., and Tashakkori, A. (2003). Major issues and controversies in the use of mixed methods in the social and behavioral sciences. In A. Tashakkori and C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research (pp. 3-50). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
283. Teddlie, C., and Tashakkori, A. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research: Integrating quantitative and qualitative approaches to social and behavioral sciences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
284. Teddlie, C., and Yu, F. (2007). Mixed methods sampling: A typology with examples. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 1(1), 77-100.
285. Tedlock, B. (2000). Ethnography and ethnographic representation. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (2nd edn) (pp. 455-86). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
286. Tedlock, B. (2011). Braiding narrative ethnography with memoir and creative nonfiction. In N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The Sage handbook of qualitative research (4th edn) (pp. 331-40). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
287. TESOL. (1997a). TESOL Quarterly statistical guidelines. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 394-5.
288. TESOL. (1997b). TESOL Quarterly qualitative guidelines. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 395-7.
289. Thompson, B. (2006). Foundations of behavioral statistics: An insight-based approach. New York: Guilford.
290. Thompson, S. K. (1992). Sampling. New York: Wiley.
291. Tufte, E. R. (2001). The visual display of quantitative information (2nd edn). Cheshire, CT: Graphics Press.
292. van Leeuwen, T. (2008). Discourse and practice: New tools for critical discourse analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
293. van Lier, L. (1988). The classroom and the language learner. London: Longman.
294. Vandergrift, L., Goh, C., Mareschal, C., and Tafaghodtari, M. (2006). The Metacognitive Awareness Listening Questionnaire: Development and validation. Language Learning, 56, 431-62.
295. Wallace, M. J. (1998). Action research for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
296. Weir, C. (2005). Language testing and validation: An evidence-based approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
297. Wood, L. A., and Kroger, R. O. (2000). Doing discourse analysis: Methods for studying action in talk and text. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
298. Yamashita, S. O. (1995). Monitoring student placement: A test-retest comparison. In J. D. Brown and S. O. Yamashita (Eds.), Language testing in Japan (pp. 12-19). Tokyo: Japan Association for Language Teaching (also available from ERIC: ED 400 713).
299. Zimmerman, K. (2005). Newly placed versus continuing students: Comparing vocabulary size. TESL Reporter, 38(1), 52-60.