Researching second language classrooms

Researching Second Language Classrooms

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 1-183

  McKay, Sandra Lee ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84906183730     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410617378     Document Type: Book

References (195)

1. Allwright, D., & Bailey, K. M. (1991). Focus on the language classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
2. Brown, J. D. (1988). Understanding research in second language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Brown, J. D., & Rodgers, T. S. (2002). Doing second language research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
4. Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
5. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. London: Routledge Falmer.
6. Johnson, D. (1992). Approaches to research in second language learning. New York: Longman.
7. McDonough, J., & McDonough, S. (1997). Research methods for English language teachers. London: Arnold.
8. Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
9. van Lier, L. (1988). The classroom and the language learner. London: Longman.
10. Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English teachers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
11. Edge, J. (Ed.) (2001). Action research. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
12. Freeman, D. (1998) Doing teacher research. New York: Heinle & Heinle Publishers.
13. Wallace, M. (1998). Action research for language teachers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
14. Brown, J. D. (2001). Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
15. Dornyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Chapter 7)
17. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. (Chapter 7)
18. Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. New York: Palgrave MacMillan. (Chapter 2)
19. Brown, J. D., & Rodgers, T. S. (2002). Doing second language research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press. (Chapter 3)
20. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
21. Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
22. Bailey, K. M., & Ochsner, R. (1983). A methodological review of the diary studies: Windmill tilting or social science? In K. M. Bailey, M. H. Long, & S. Peck (Eds.), Second language acquisition studies (pp. 188-198). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
23. Bailey, K. M. (1990). The use of diary studies in teacher education programs. In J. C. Richards & D. Nunan (Eds.), Second language teacher education (pp. 215-240). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Bailey, K. M. (1991). Diary studies of classroom language learning: The doubting game and the believing game. In E. Sadtono (Ed.), Language acquisition and the second/foreign language classroom (pp. 60-102). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Center.
25. Johnson, D. (1992). Approaches to research in second language learning. New York: Longman. (Chapter 4)
26. Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Chapter 4)
27. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research design and method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Fetterman, D. (1989). Ethnography. New York: Sage.
29. Johnson, D. (1992). Approaches to research in second language learning. New York: Longman. (Chapter 6)
30. Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (Chapter 3)
31. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
32. Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
33. Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participation observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
34. Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
35. Fanselow, J. (1987). Breaking rules. New York: Longman.
36. Spada, N., & Fröhlich, M. (1995). COLT Observation Scheme. Sydney: NCELTR, Macquarie University.
37. Have, P. (1999). Doing conversation analysis. London: Sage.
38. Lazaraton, A. (2002). Quantitative and qualitative approaches to discourse analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 32-51.
39. Markee, N. (2000). Conversation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41. Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Theory and practice of writing. London: Addison Wesley Longman. (Chapter 2)
42. Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
43. Connor, U., & Kaplan, R. B. (Eds.). (1987). Writing across languages. Analysis of L2 text. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
44. Panetta, C. (Ed.). (2001). Contrastive rhetoric revisited and redefined. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45. Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2001). Quantitative corpus-based research: Much more than bean counting. TESOL Quarterly, 35(2), 331-336.
46. Conrad, S. (1999). The importance of corpus-based research for language teachers. System, 27, 1-18.
47. Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
48. McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2001). Size isn't everything: Spoken English, corpus and the classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35(2), 337-340.
49. Madsen, D. (1992). Successful dissertations and theses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
50. Mauch, J., & Birch, J. (1998) Guide to the successful thesis and dissertation. New York: Marcel Dekker.
51. American Psychological Association. (1994) Publication manual of the American psychological association (4th ed.). Washington, DC.
52. Swales, J. (1990). Genre analysis: English in academic and research settings. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
53. Swales, J., & Feak, C. (2000). English in today's research world: A writing guide. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
54. Allen, P., Fröhlich, M., & Spada, N. (1984). The communicative orientation of language teaching: An observation scheme. In J. Handscombe, R. Orem, & B. Taylor (Eds.), On TESOL '83: The question of control (pp. 231-252). Washington, DC: TESOL.
55. Allwright, D., & Bailey, K. M. (1991). Focus on the language classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
56. Atkinson, J. M., & Heritage, J. (Eds.). (1984). Structure of social action: Studies in conversation analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
57. Auerbach, E. (1986). Competency-based ESL: One step forward or two steps back? TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 411-430.
58. Bailey, K. M. (1983). Competitiveness and anxiety in adult second language learning: Looking at and through the diary studies. In H. W. Selinger & M. H. Long (Eds.), Classroom oriented research in second language acquisition (pp. 67-103). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
59. Bailey, K. M. (1990). The use of diary studies in teacher education programs. In J. C. Richards & D. Nunan (Eds.), Second language teacher education (pp. 215-240). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
60. Bailey, K. M. (1991). Diary studies of classroom language learning: The doubting game and the believing game. In E. Sadtono (Ed.), Language acquisition and the second/foreign language classroom (pp. 60-102). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Center.
61. Bailey, K. M., & Ochsner, R. (1983). A methodological review of the diary studies: Windmill tilting or social science? In K. M. Bailey, M. H. Long, & S. Peck (Eds.), Second language acquisition studies (pp. 188-198). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
62. Bardovi-Harlig, & Dornyei, Z. (1998). Do language learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic versus grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 32(2), 233-262.
63. Bellello, M. (2003). Why some ESL writers are better than others. Unpublished manuscript.
64. Biber, D., & Conrad, S. (2001). Quantitative corpus-based research: Much more than bean counting. TESOL Quarterly, 35(2), 331-336.
65. Biber, D., Johansson, S., Leech, G., Conrad, S., & Finegan, E. (1999). Longman grammar of spoken and written English. London: Longman.
66. Block, D. (2000). Problematizing interview data: Voices in the mind's machine? TESOL Quarterly, 34(4), 757-768.
67. Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 463-494.
68. Bond, A. (1998). Dealing with different learning styles. In J. C. Richards (Ed.), Teaching in action (pp. 176-179). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
69. Borg, S. (1998). Teachers' pedagogical systems and grammar teaching: A qualitative study. TESOL Quarterly, 32(1), 9-38.
70. Brown, J. D. (1988). Understanding research in second language. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
71. Brown, J. D. (2001). Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
72. Brown, J. D., & Rodgers, T. S. (2002). Doing second language research. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
73. Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English teachers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
74. Cameron, D., Frazer, E., Harvey, P., Rampton, M. B. H., & Richardson, K. (Eds.). (1992). Researching language: Issues of power and method. London, UK: Routledge.
75. Celce-Murcia, M., & Olshtain, E. (2000). Discourse and context in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
76. Chaudron, C. (1988). Second language classrooms: Research on teaching and learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
77. Chen, H.-C., & Graves, M. F. (1995). Effects of previewing and providing background knowledge on Taiwanese college students' comprehension of American short stories. TESOL Quarterly, 29(4), 663-686.
78. Chick, J. K. (1996). Intercultural communication. In S. L. McKay & N. Hornberger (Eds.), Sociolinguistics and language teaching (pp. 329-348). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
79. Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2000). Research methods in education. London, UK: Routledge Falmer.
80. Connor, U. (1994). Text Analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 682-684.
81. Connor, U. (1996). Contrastive rhetoric. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
82. Connor, U., & Kaplan, R. B. (Eds.). (1987). Writing across languages: An analysis of L2 text. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
83. Conrad, S. (1999). The importance of corpus-based research for language teachers. System, 27, 1-18.
84. Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1999). Cultural mirrors: Materials and methods in the EFL classroom. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in second language teaching and learning (pp. 196-219). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
85. Cowie, N. (2001). An "It's not action research yet, but I'm getting there" approach to teaching writing. In J. Edge (Ed.), Action research (pp. 21-33). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
86. Coxhead, A. (2000). A new academic word list. TESOL Quarterly, 34(2), 213-238.
87. Dawkins, R. (2003). A devil's chaplain: Reflections on hope, lies, science, and love. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.
88. Dornyei, Z. (2003). Questionnaires in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
89. Duff, P. (1995). An ethnography of communication in immersion classrooms in Hungary. TESOL Quarterly, 29(3), 505-536.
90. Edge, J. (1996). Cross-cultural paradoxes in a profession of values. TESOL Quarterly, 30(1), 9-30.
91. Edge, J. (2001). Action research. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
92. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
93. Fang, X., & Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and curricular reform in China: A case study. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 301-324.
94. Fanselow, J. (1987). Breaking rules. New York: Longman.
95. Ferris, C. (1997). The influence of teacher commentary on student revision. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 315-339.
96. Ferris, D. (1994). Rhetorical strategies in student persuasive writing: Differences between native and non-native English speakers. Research in the Teaching of English, 28(1), 45-65.
97. Fetterman, D. (1989). Ethnography step by step. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
98. Flowerdew, J., & Miller, L. (1995). On the notion of culture in second language lectures. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 345-374.
99. Flowerdew, L. (2003). A combined corpus and systemic-functional analysis of the problemsolution pattern in a student and professional corpus of technical writing. TESOL Quarterly, 37(3), 489-512.
100. Frazier, S. (2003). A corpus analysis of would-clauses without adjacent if-clauses. TESOL Quarterly, 37(3), 443-466.
101. Freeman, D. (1998). Doing teacher research. New York: Heinle & Heinle.
102. Fukuda, Y. (2003a). Error treatment in oral communication classes in Japanese high schools. Unpublished Master's Thesis, San Francisco State University, San Francisco.
103. Fukuda, Y. (2003b). Summary of my master's thesis: Treatment of spoken errors in Japanese high school oral communication classes. Unpublished manuscript.
104. Gass, S., & Mackey, A. (2000). Stimulated recall methodology in second language research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoicates.
105. Gibbons, P. (2003). Mediating language learning: Teacher interactions with ESL students in a content-based classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 247-274.
106. Gilmore, A. (2004). A comparison of textbook and authentic interactions. ELT Journal, 58(4), 363-374.
107. Goh, C. M. (2002). Exploring listening comprehension tactics and their interaction patterns. System, 30, 185-206.
108. Goldstein, L., & Conrad, S. (1990). Student input and negotiation of meaning in ESL writing conferences. TESOL Quarterly, 24(3), 443-460.
109. Grabe, W., & Kaplan, R. B. (1996). Theory and practice of writing. London, UK: Addison Wesley Longman.
110. Gu, Y. (2003). Fine brush and freehand: The vocabulary learning art of two successful Chinese EFL learners. TESOL Quarterly, 37(1), 73-104.
111. Hancock, M. (1997). Behind classroom code switching: Layering and language choice in L2 learner interaction. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 217-236.
112. Harklau, L. (1994). ESL versus mainstream classes: Contrasting L2 learning environments. TESOL Quarterly, 28(2), 241-272.
113. Have, P. (1999). Doing conversation analysis. London: Sage.
114. Hinkel, E. (1995). The use of modal verbs as a reflection of cultural values. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 325-344.
115. Hinkel, E. (2003). Simplicity without elegance: Features of sentences in L1 and L2 academic texts. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 275-302.
116. Hinkel, E. (2004). Tense, aspect and the passive voice in L1 and L2 academic texts. Language Teaching Research, 8(1), 5-29.
117. Homburg, T. J. (1984). Holistic evaluation of ESL compositions: Can it be validated objectively? TESOL Quarterly, 18, 87-107.
118. Hornberger, N. (1994). Ethnography. TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 688-690.
119. Horowitz, D. (1986). Essay examination prompts and the teaching of academic writing. English for Specific Purposes, 5(2), 107-120.
120. Hunston, S. (2002). Corpora in applied linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
121. Hunt, K. (1965). Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. Urbana, IL: National Council of teachers of English.
122. Hyland, K. (1999). Academic attribution: Citation and the construction of disciplinary knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 20, 341-367.
123. Hyland, K. (2002). Teaching and researching writing. London, UK: Longman.
124. Igarashi, M. (2003). An analysis of writing conferences in college ESL composition. Unpublished manuscript.
125. Ishikawa, S. (1995). Objective measurement of low-proficiency ESL narrative writing. Journal of Second Language Writing, 4(1), 51-70.
126. Iwasaki, S. (2000). Evaluating cultural context and content in EFL materials: A study of high school level oral communication textbooks in Japan. Paper presented at the TESOL Convention 2000, Vancouver, Canada.
127. Jenkins, S., & Hinds, J. (1987). Business letter writing: English, French, and Japanese. TESOL Quarterly, 21(2), 327-354.
128. Johnson, D. (1992). Approaches to research in second language learning. New York: Longman.
129. Jones, L. (2002). Let's talk, Book 3. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
130. Kamhi-Stein, L. D. (2003). Reading in two languages: How attitudes toward home language and beliefs about reading affect the behaviors of "underprepared" L2 college readers. TESOL Quarterly, 37(1), 35-71.
131. Kaplan, R. B. (1966). Cultural thought patterns in intercultural education. Language Learning, 16, 1-20.
132. Kaplan, R. B. (2001). Foreword: What in the world is contrastive rhetoric? In C. G. Panetta (Ed.), Contrastive rhetoric revisited and redefined (pp. vii-xx). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
133. Kasper, G. (1998). Analysing verbal protocols. TESOL Quarterly, 32(2), 358-362.
134. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (Eds.). (1992). The action research planner. Geeloong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
135. Kern, R. G. (1994). The role of mental translation in second language reading. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16(4), 441-461.
136. Kroll, B., & Reid, J. (1994). Guidelines for designing writing prompts: Clarifications, caveats, and cautions. Journal of Second Language Writing, 3(3), 231-255.
137. Kumaravadivelu, B. (1999). Critical classroom discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 33(3), 453-484.
138. Labov, W. (1982). Objectivity and commitment in linguistic science: The case of the Black English trial in Ann Arbor. Language in Society, 11, 165-201.
139. Land, & Whitley, C. (1989). Evaluating second language essays in regular composition classes: Toward a pluralistic U.S. rhetoric. In D. Johnson & D. Roen (Eds.), Richness in writing (pp. 284-293). New York: Longman.
140. Lazaraton, A. (2002). Quantitative and qualitative approaches to discourse analysis. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 32-51.
141. Lazaraton, A. (2003). Incidental displays of cultural knowledge in the nonnative-Englishspeaking teacher's classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 37(2), 213-246.
142. Leki, I. (1995). Coping strategies of ESL students in writing tasks across the curriculum. TESOL Quarterly, 29(2), 235-260.
143. Li, D. (1998). "It's always more difficult than you plan and imagine": Teachers' perceived difficulties in introducing the communicative approach in South Korea. TESOL Quarterly, 32(4), 677-703.
144. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverley Hills: Sage.
145. Liu, D. (2003). The most frequently used spoken American English idioms: A corpus analysis and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 671-700.
146. Madsen, D. (1992). Successful dissertations and theses. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
147. Mangelsdorf, K. (1992). Peer review in the ESL composition classroom: What do the students think. ELT Journal, 46(3), 274-284.
148. Markee, N. (2000). Conversation analysis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
149. Matsuda, A. (2002). Representation of users and uses of English in beginning Japanese EFL textbooks. JALT Journal, 24(2), 182-200.
150. Mauch, J., & Birch, J. (1998). Guide to the successful thesis and dissertation. New York: Marcel Dekker.
151. McCarthy, M. (1991). Discourse analysis for language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
152. McCarthy, M., & Carter, R. (2001). Size isn't everything: Spoken English, corpus and the classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 35(2), 337-340.
153. McDonough, J., & McDonough, S. (1997). Research methods for English language teachers. London: Arnold.
154. McKay, S. (Ed.). (1984). Composing in a second language. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
155. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis. London: Sage.
156. Minami, S. (in press). Sustained-content reading and its effect on reading comprehension. Journal of Minami Kywshu Junior College.
157. Mohan, B. A., & Lo, W. A. (1985). Academic writing and Chinese students: Transfer and developmental factors. TESOL Quarterly, 19(3), 515-534.
158. Nakahama, Y., Tyler, A., & van Lier, L. (2001). Negotiation of meaning in conversational and information gap activities: A comparative discourse analysis. TESOL Quarterly, 35(3), 377-405.
159. Newell, A., & Simon, H. A. (1972). Human problem solving. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
160. NIH. (2002). Human participant protections education for research teams. Unpublished manuscript.
161. Numrich, C. (1996). On becoming a language teacher: Insights from diary studies. TESOL Quarterly, 30(1), 131-154.
162. Nunan, D. (1992). Research methods in language learning. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
163. O'Keeffe, A., & Farr, F. (2003). Using language corpora in initial teacher education: Pedagogic issues and practical applications. TESOL Quarterly, 37(3), 389-418.
164. O'Kelly, T. A. (1998). When students won't use English in class. In J. C. Richards (Ed.), Teaching in action (pp. 187-190). Alexandra, VA: TESOL.
165. Panetta, C. G. (Ed.). (2001). Contrastive rhetoric revisited and redefined. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
166. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
167. Peirce, B. N. (1995a). Social identity, investment and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29(1), 9-31.
168. Peirce, B. N. (1995b). The theory of methodology in qualitative research. TESOL Quarterly, 29(3), 569-576.
169. Prodromou, L. (1992). What culture? Which culture? Cross-cultural factors in language learning. ELT Journal, 46(1), 39-50.
170. Publication manual of the American psychological association. (1994). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
171. QSR. (1995). QSR NUD*IST [Computer Software]. London: Sage.
172. Raimes, A. (1985). What unskilled writers do as they write: A classroom study of composing. TESOL Quarterly, 19, 229-258.
173. Reid, J. (1992). A computer text analysis of four cohesive devices in English discourse by native and nonnative writers. Journal of Second Language Writing, 1(2), 79-108.
174. Richards, J. C. (Ed.). (1998). Teaching in action. Alexandra, VA: TESOL.
175. Richards, K. (2003). Qualitative inquiry in TESOL. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
176. Scarcella, R. (1984). How writers orient their readers in expository essays: A comparative study of native and non-native English writers. TESOL Quarterly, 18(4), 671-689.
177. Schegloff, E., Koshik, I., Jacoby, S., & Olsher, D. (2002). Conversation analysis and applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 22, 3-31.
178. Schmidt, R. W., & Froda, S. N. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. R. Day (Ed.), Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237-326). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
179. Silva, T. (1993). Toward an understanding of the distinct nature of L2 writing: The ESL research and its implications. TESOL Quarterly, 27(4), 657-677.
180. Smagorinsky, P. (1994). Think-aloud protocol analysis: Beyond the black box. In P. Smagorinsky (Ed.), Speaking about writing: Reflections on research methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
181. Spada, N., & Fröhlich, M. (1995). COLT observation scheme. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
182. Spradley, J. P. (1980). Participation observation. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
183. Street, B. (1984). Literacy in theory and practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
184. Swales, J. M. (1990). Genre analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
185. Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. (1994). Academic writing for graduate students. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
186. Swales, J. M., & Feak, C. (2000). English in today's research world. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
187. Toohey, K. (1998). "Breaking them up, taking them away": ESL students in grade 1. TESOL Quarterly, 32(1), 61-84.
188. Ulichny, P. (1996). Performed conversations in an ESL classroom. TESOL Quarterly, 30(4), 739-764.
189. Upton, T., & Connor, U. (2001). Using computerized corpus analysis to investigate the textlinguistic discourse moves of a genre. English for Specific Purposes, 20(4), 313-329.
190. van Lier, L. (1988). The classroom and the language learner. London: Longman.
191. Wallace, M. (1998). Action research for language teachers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
192. Willett, J. (1995). Becoming first graders in an L2: An ethnographic study of L2 socialization. TESOL Quarterly, 29(3), 473-504.
193. Williams, H. (2004). Lexical frames and reported speech. ELT Journal, 58(3), 247-257.
194. Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research design and method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
195. Zamel, V. (1985). Responding to student writing. TESOL Quarterly, 19(1), 79-101.