Action research

Handbook of Research in Second Language Teaching and Learning

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 241-256

  Burns, Anne ^a  

^a MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85009649699     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781410612700-22     Document Type: Chapter

References (141)

1. Allen, J. P. B., Frohlich, M., & Spada, N. (1984). The communicative orientation of language teaching: An observation scheme. In J. Handscombe, R. A. Orem, & B. Taylor (Eds.), On TESOL '83: The question of control (pp. 231-252). Washington, DC: TESOL.
2. Allwright, D. (1980). Turns, topics and tasks: Patterns of participation in language learning and teaching. In D. Larsen-Freeman (Ed), Discourse analysis in second language research (pp. 165-187). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
3. Allwright, D. (1988). Observation in the language classroom. London: Longman.
4. Allwright, D. (1993). Integrating –research— and –pedagogy—: Appropriate criteria and practical possibilities. In J. Edge & K. Richards (Eds.), Teachers develop teachers research (pp. 125-135). London: Heinemann.
5. Allwright, D. (1997). Quality and sustainability in teacher-research. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 368-370.
6. Allwright, D., & Bailey, K. (1991). Focus on the language classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
7. Allwright, D., & Lenzuen, R. (1997). Exploratory practice. Work at the Cultura Inglesa, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Language Teaching Research, 1(1), 73-79.
8. Argyris, C., & Schon, D. (1978). Organizational learning. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
9. Auerbach, E. (1994). Participatory action research. TESOL Quarterly, 28(4), 693-697.
10. Auerbach, E., Arnaud, J., Chandler, C., & Zambrano, A. (1998). Building community strengths: A model for training literacy instructors. In T. Smoke (Ed.), Adult ESL: Politics, pedagogy and participation in classroom and community programs (pp. 209-228). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Bailey, K. & Nunan, D. (Eds.). (1996). Voices from the language classroom. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
12. Bailey, K. (1998). Approaches to empirical research in instructional settings. In H. Byrnes (Ed.), Perspectives in research and scholarship in second language teaching (pp. 123-178). New York: The Modern Language Association of America.
13. Batliwala, S., & Patel, S. (1997). A census as participatory research. In R. McTaggart (Ed.), Participatory action research (pp. 263-277). Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
14. Berger P. L., & Luckman, T. (1966). The social construction of reality. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
15. Bissex, G., & Bullock, R. (Eds.). (1987). Seeing for ourselves: Case study research by teachers of writing. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemman.
16. Bogdan, R., & Biklen, S. K. (1982). Qualitative research for education: An introduction to theory and methods. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
17. Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
18. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
19. Breen, M. P. (1985). The social context for language learning—a neglected situation? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 7,135-158.
20. Breen, M. P., & Candlin, C. N. (1980). The essentials of a communicative curriculum in language teaching. Applied Linguistics, 1, 89-112.
21. Breen, M. P., Candlin, C. N., Dam, L., & Gabrielsen, G. (1989). The evolution of a teacher training program. In R. K. Johnson (Ed.), The second language curriculum (pp. 111-135). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
22. Brindley, G. (1990). Towards a research agenda for TESOL. Prospect, 6(1), 7-26.
23. Brumfit, C., & Mitchell, R. (1989). The language classroom as a focus for research. In C. Brumfit & R. Mitchell (Eds.), Research in the language classroom. (ELT Documents 133, pp. 3-15). London: Modern English Publications and The British Council.
24. Bronfonbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
25. Brown, G., Anderson, A., Shillcock, R., & Yule, G. (1984). Teaching talk: Strategies for production and assessment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
26. Brousseau, K. (1996). Action research in the second language classroom: Two views of a writing process class. Carleton Papers in Applied Language Studies, 13,1-20.
27. Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for English language teachers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28. Burns, A. (2000). Action research and applied research: What are the relationships? The Language Teacher, 24(7), 3-5.
29. Burns, A., & Hood, S. (1995). Teachers' voices: Exploring course design in a changing curriculum. Sydney, Australia: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
30. Burns, A., & Hood, S. (1998). Teachers' voices 3: Teaching critical literacy. Sydney, Australia: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
31. Burns, A., & de Silva Joyce, H. (2000). Teachers' voices 5: A new look at reading practices. Sydney, Australia: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
32. Burton, J. (Ed.). (1987). Implementing the learner-centred curriculum. Adelaide, South Australia: National Curriculum Resource Centre.
33. Burton, J. (1998). Professionalism in language teaching. Prospect, 13(3), 24-35.
34. Candlin, C. N. (1993). Problematising authenticity: Whose texts for whom? Paper presented at the TESOL Convention, Atlanta, GA.
35. Carr, W., & Kemmis, S. (1986). Becoming critical: Knowing through action research. London: Falmer.
36. Cicourel, A. V., & Kitsuse, J. I. (1963). A note on the use of official statistics. Social Problems, 11, 131-139.
37. Cochran-Smith, M., & Lytle, S. (1990). Research on teaching and teacher research: The issues that divide. Educational Researcher, 19(2), 2-11.
38. Collier, J. (1945, May). United States Indian administration as a laboratory of ethnic relations. Social Research, 12,265-303.
39. Connelly, F. M., & Clandinin, J. D. (1988). Teachers as curriculum planners: Narratives of experience. New York: Teachers College Press.
40. Corey, S. (1949). Action research, fundamental research and educational practices. Teachers College Record, 50, 509-514.
41. Corey, S. (1952). Action research by teachers and the population sampling problem. Journal of Educational Psychology, 43,331-338.
42. Corey, S. (1953). Action research to improve school practices. New York: Columbia University Teachers College Press.
43. Cowie, N. (2001). An –It's not action research yet, but I'm getting there— approach to teaching writing. In J. Edge (Ed.), Action research (pp. 47-63). Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
44. Crookes, G. (1989). Grassroots action to improve ESL programs. University of Hawaii Working Papers in ESL, 8(2), 45-61.
45. Crookes, G. (1993). Action research for second language teachers: Going beyond teacher research. Applied Linguistics, 14(2), 130-144.
46. Crookes, G., & Chandler, P. (1999). Introducing action research into post-secondary foreign language teacher education. Foreign Language Annals, 34(2), 131-140.
47. Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (1998). Strategies of qualitative enquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
48. Dewey, J. (1904). The relation of theory to practice in education. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49. Ebbutt, D. (1983). Educational action research: Some general concerns and specific quibbles. In R. Burgess (Ed.), Issues in educational research (pp. 152-174). London: Falmer.
50. Edge, J. (Ed.). (2001). Action research. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
51. Edge, J., & Richards, K. (Eds.). (1993). Teachers develop teachers research. London: Heinemann.
52. Elliot, J. (1981). Action research for educational change. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
53. Elliott, J. (1985). Educational action research. In J. Nisbet (Ed.), World Yearbook of Education 1985: Research, Policy and Practice (pp. 231-250) London: Kogan Page.
54. Elliott, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press.
55. Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
56. Fals Borda, O. (1979). Investigating reality in order to change it: The Columbian experience. Dialectical Anthropology, 4, 33-55.
57. Ferguson, P. (1998). The politics of Adult ESL literacy: Becoming politically visible. In T. Smoke (Ed.), Adult ESL: Politics, pedagogy and participation in classroom and community programs (pp. 3-16) Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
58. Freeman, D. (1996). Redefining the relationships between research and what teachers know. In K. Bailey & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the language classroom (pp. 88-122). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
59. Freeman, D. (1998). Doing teacher research. From inquiry to understanding. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
60. Freeman, D., & Richards, J. (Eds.). (1996). Teacher learning in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
61. Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York: Herder & Herder.
62. Freire, P. (1982). Creating alternative research methods: Learning to do it by doing it. In B. Hall, A. Gillette, & R. Tandon (Eds.), Creating knowledge: A monopoly? (pp). New Delhi, India: Society for Participatory Research in Asia.
63. Gebhard, J. (1996). Teaching English as a second or foreign language. A self-development and methodology guide. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press.
64. Gersten, B. F., & Tlusty, N. (1998). Creating contexts for cultural communication: Video exchange projects in the EFL/ESL classroom. TESOL Journal, 7(5), 11-16.
65. Gore, J. M., & Zeichner, K. M. (1991). Action research and reflective teaching in preservice education: A case study from the United States. Teaching and Teacher Education, 7(2), 119-136.
66. Goswami, D., & Stillman, J. (1987). Reclaiming the classroom: Teacher research as an agency for change. Upper Montclair, NJ.: Boynton/Cook.
67. Grotjahn, R. (1987). On the methodological basis of introspective methods. In C. Faerch & G. Kasper (Eds.), Introspection in second language research. (pp) Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
68. Habermas, J. (1972). Knowledge and human interests; Theory and practice; Communication and the evolution of society. London: Heinemann.
69. Hall, B. L. (1979). Knowledge as commodity and participatory research. Prospects, 9(4), 393-408.
70. Halsey, A. H. (Ed.). (1972). Educational priority: Volume 1: E.P.A. Problems and policies. London: HMSO.
71. Hitchcock, G., & Hughes, D. (1995). Research and the teacher. (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.
72. Hodgkinson, H. L. (1957). Action research—a critique. Journal of Educational Sociology, 31(4), 137-153.
73. Jarvis, G. (1981). Action research versus needed research for the 1980s. In D. L. Lange (Ed.), Proceedings of the National Conference on Professional Priorities (pp). Hastings-on-Hudson, NY: ACTFL Materials Center.
74. Jarvis, G. (1983). Pedagogical knowledge for the second language teacher. In J. Alatis, H. H. Stern, & P. Strevens (Eds.), Applied linguistics and the preparation of teachers: Towards a rationale (pp). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
75. Kemmis, S. (1982). Action research. A short modern history. Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
76. Kemmis, S. (1993). Action research. In M. Hammersley (Ed.), Educational research—current issues (pp. 235-245). London: P. Chatman.
77. Kemmis, S., & McTaggart, R. (Eds.). (1986). The action research planner. Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
78. Kember, D. (2001). Reflective teaching and learning in the health professions. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
79. Kincheloe, J. (1991). Teachers as researchers: Qualitative inquiry as a path to empowerment. London: Falmer.
80. Larsen-Freeman, D. (1983). Training teachers or educating a teacher. In J. E. Alatis, H. H. Stern, & P. Strevens (Eds.), Georgetown University Roundtable on Language and Linguistics. Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
81. Lazaraton, A. (1995). Qualitative research in applied linguistics: A progress report. TESOL Quarterly, 29(3), 455-472.
82. Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues,2,34-46.
83. Lewin, K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts. New York: Harper & Row.
84. Lichtenstein, B. M. (1988). Feminist epistemology: A thematic review. Thesis Eleven, 21,140-151.
85. Long, M. (1983). Training the second language teacher as classroom researcher. In J. E. Alatis, H. H. Stern, & P. Strevens (Eds.), Applied linguistics and the preparation of teachers: Towards a rationale (pp. 281-297). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
86. Long, M., Adams, H., McLean, L., & Castanos, F. (1976). Doing things with words: Verbal interaction in lockstep and small group situations. In J. Fanselow & R. Crymes (Eds.), On TESOL '76 (pp. 137-153). Washington, DC: TESOL.
87. Markee, N. (1997). Managing curricular innovation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
88. Marrow, A. (1969). The practical theorist: The life and work of Kurt Lewin. New York: Basic Books.
89. Mathew, R., & Lalitha Eapen, R. (Eds.). (1996). Thelanguage curriculum dynamics of change. Teacher as researcher (Vol. 2). Report of the International Seminar (August 1995). Hyderabad, India: Central Institute of English and Foreign Languages.
90. Mathew, R. (2000). Teacher-research approach to curriculum renewal and teacher development. In R. Mathew, R. L. Eapen and J. Tharu (Eds.), The language curriculum: Dynamics of change. Volume I: The outsider perspective (pp. 6-21). Hyderabad, India: Orient Longman.
91. McCarthy, M. (2001). Issues in applied linguistics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
92. McKernan, J. (1996). Curriculum action research (2nd ed.). London: Kogan Page.
93. McNiff, J. (1988). Action research: Principles and practice. London: Routledge.
94. McPherson, P. (1997). Action research: Exploring learner diversity. Prospect, 12(1), 50-62.
95. McTaggart, R. (1991). Action research. A short modern history. Geelong, Victoria, Australia: Deakin University Press.
96. Mickan, P. (Ed.). (1996). Classroom language investigations. Adelaide, Australia: National Languages and Literacy Institute of Australia.
97. Mishler, E. (1990). Validation in inquiry-guided research: The role of exemplars in narrative study. Harvard Educational Review, 60(4), 415-442.
98. Nunan, D. (1985). Language teaching course design: Trends and issues. Adelaide, Australia: National Curriculum Resource Centre.
99. Nunan, D. (1987). The teacher as curriculum developer. Adelaide, Australia: National Curriculum Resource Centre.
100. Nunan, D. (1988). The learner-centred curriculum. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
101. Nunan, D. (1989a). Understanding language classrooms: A guide for teacher-initiated action. New York: Prentice-Hall.
102. Nunan, D. (1989b). The teacher as researcher. In C. Brumfit & R. Mitchell (Eds.), Research in the language classroom. (ELT Documents 133, pp. 16-32). London: Modern English Publications and The British Council.
103. Nunan, D. (1990). Action research in the language classroom. In J. C. Richards & D. Nunan (Eds.), Second language teacher education (pp. 62-81). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
104. Nunan, D. (1997). Developing standards for teacher-research in TESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 31(2), 365-37.
105. Nunan, D., & Lamb, C. (1996). The self-directed teacher. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
106. O'Keefe, J. (2001). The love of my life: A thematic approach to teaching vocabulary. In A. Burns & H. de Silva Joyce (Eds.), Teachers' voices 7: Teaching vocabulary (pp. 86-97). Sydney, Australia: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research.
107. Pennington, M. (1990). A professional development focus for the language teaching practicum. In J. C. Richards & D. Nunan (Eds.), Second language teacher education (pp. 132-152). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
108. Rapoport, R.N. (1970). The three dilemmas in action research. Human Relations, 23(6), 499.
109. Reid, W. A. (1978). Thinking about curriculum: The nature and treatment of curriculum problems. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
110. Reason, P. (1998). Three approaches to participative inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Strategies of qualitative enquiry (pp. 324-339). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
111. Rogers, C. (1961). On becoming a person. London: Constable.
112. Richards, J. C. (1990). The dilemma of teacher education in second language teaching. In J. C. Richards & D. Nunan (Eds.), Reprinted from TESOL Quarterly, 21, 209-226. Second language teacher education (pp. 3-15). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. (original work Published 1987)
113. Richards, J. C. (Ed.). (1998). Teaching in action. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.
114. Richards, J. C. (2001). Postscript: The ideology of TESOL. In R. Carter & D. Nunan (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to teaching English to speakers of other languages (pp. 213-217). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
115. Richards, J. C., & Nunan, D. (Eds.). (1990). Second language teacher education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
116. Richards, J. C., & Lockhart, C. (1994). Reflective teaching in second language classrooms. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
117. Roberts, J. (1998). Language teacher education. London Edward: Arnold.
118. Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner. How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
119. Schutz, A. (1967). The phenomenology of the social world. Evanston, IL: Northwest University Press.
120. Schwab, J. (1969). College curricula and student protest. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
121. Stenhouse, L. (1971). The Humanities Curriculum Project: The rationale. Theory into Practice, X(3), 154-162.
122. Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heinemann.
123. Strickland, D. (1988). The teacher as researcher: Toward the extended professional. Language Arts, 65(8), 754-764.
124. Taba, H., & Noel, E. (1957). Action research: A case study. Washington, DC: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, National Education Association.
125. Tinker Sachs, G. (2000). Teacher and researcher autonomy in action research. Prospect: A Journal of Australian TESOL, 15(3), 35-51.
126. Tinker Sachs, G. (Ed.) (2002). Action research. Fostering and furthering effective practices in the teaching of English. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.
127. Tsui, A. (1996). Reticence and anxiety in second language learning. In K. Bailey & D. Nunan (Eds.), Voices from the language classroom (pp. 145-167). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
128. Thorne, C., & Qiang, W. (1996). Action research in language teacher education. ELT Journal, 50(3), 254-261.
129. Tudor, I. (1996). Learner-centredness as language education. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
130. van Lier, L. (1988). The classroom and the language learner. London: Longman.
131. van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum. London: Longman.
132. van Lier, L. (1997). Observation from an ecological perspective. TESOL Quarterly, 31(4), 783-786.
133. van Manen, M. (1984). Action research as theory of the unique: From pedagogic thoughtfulness to pedagogic tactfulness. Paper presented at the American Educational Research Association Conference, New Orleans, LA.
134. Wallace, M. (1991). Training foreign language teachers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
135. Wallace, M. (1998). Action research for language teachers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
136. Wallat, C., Green, J., Conlin, S. M., & Haramis, M. (1983). Issues related to action research in the classroom— the teacher and researcher as a team. In J. Green & C. Wallat (Eds.), Ethnography and language in educational settings (pp. 89-113). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
137. Wells, G., & Chang-Wells, G. L. (1992). Constructing knowledge together. Portsmouth, NH.: Heinemann.
138. Whitehead, J., & Lomax, P. (1987). Action research and the politics of educational knowledge. British Educational Research Journal, 13(2), 175-190.
139. Winter, R (1989). Learning from experience. London: Falmer.
140. Woods, D. (1996). Teacher cognition in language teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
141. Zephir, F. (2000). Focus on form and meaning: Perspectives of developing teachers and action-based research. Foreign Language Annals, 33(1), 19-30.