Metadiscourse in academic writing: A reappraisal

Applied Linguistics

Volumn 25, Issue 2, 2004, Pages

  Hyland, Ken ^a,c   Tse, Polly ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 4043134585     PISSN: 01426001     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/applin/25.2.156     Document Type: Review

References (41)

1. Atkinson, D. 1999. Scientific Discourse in Socio-historical Context. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
2. Barton, E. 1995. 'Contrastive and non-contrastive connectives,' Written Communication 12/2: 219-39.
3. Beauvais, P. 1989. 'A speech-act theory of metadiscourse,' Written Communication 61: 11-30.
4. Becher, T. 1989. Academic Tribes and Territories: Intellectual Inquiry and the Cultures of Disciplines. Milton Keynes: SRHE/OUP.
5. Bunton, D. 1999. 'The use of higher level metatext in PhD theses,' English for Specific Purposes 18: S41-S56.
6. Cheng, X. and M. Steffensen. 1996. 'Metadiscourse: A technique for improving student writing,' Research in the Teaching of English 30/2: 149-81.
7. Coates, J. 1983. The Semantics of the Modal Auxiliaries. Beckenham: Croom Helm.
8. Council of Biology Editors. 1994. Scientific Style and Format: the CBE manual for authors, editors, and publishers 6th edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Crismore, A. 1989. Talking with Readers: Metadiscourse as Rhetorical Act. New York: Peter Lang.
10. Crismore, A. and R. Farnsworth. 1989. 'Mr. Darwin and his readers: Exploring interpersonal metadiscourse as a dimension of ethos,' Rhetoric Review 8/1: 91-112.
11. Crismore, A. and R. Farnsworth. 1990. 'Metadiscourse in popular and professional science discourse' in W. Nash, (ed.): The Writing Scholar. Studies in Academic Discourse. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 119-36.
12. Crismore, A., R. Markkanen, and M. Steffensen. 1993. 'Metadiscourse in persuasive writing: A study of texts written by American and Finnish university students,' Written Communication 10/1: 39-71.
13. Davis, E. and D. Schmidt. 1995. Using the Biological Literature: A Practical Guide 2nd edn. New York: Dekker.
14. Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar 2nd edn. London: Edward Arnold.
15. Hoey, M. 1988. 'Writing to meet the reader's needs: Text patterning and reading strategies', Tronheim Papers in Applied Linguistics 4: 51-73.
16. Hunston, S. and G. Thompson, (eds) 2001. Evaluation in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
17. Hyland, K. 1998a. 'Persuasion and context: The pragmatics of academic metadiscourse,' Journal of Pragmatics 30: 437-55.
18. Hyland, K. 1998b. 'Exploring corporate rhetoric: Metadiscourse in the CEO's letter,' Journal of Business Communication 35/2: 224-45.
19. Hyland, K. 1998c. Hedging in Scientific Research Articles. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
20. Hyland, K. 2000. Disciplinary Discourses: Social Interactions in Academic Writing. London: Longman.
21. Hyland, K. 2001a. 'Bringing in the reader: Addressee features in academic articles,' Written Communication 18/4: 549-74.
22. Hyland, K. 2001b. 'Humble servants of the discipline? Self-mention in research articles,' English for Specific Purposes 20: 207-26.
23. Hyland, K. 2004. 'Disciplinary interactions: Metadiscourse in L2 postgraduate writing,' Journal of Second Language Writing.
24. Intraprawat, P. and M. Steffensen. 1995. 'The use of metadiscourse in good and poor ESL essays,' Journal of Second Language Writing 4/3: 253-72.
25. McMillan, V. 1997. Writing Papers in the Biological Sciences 2nd edn. Boston: Bedford Books.
26. Mao, L. R. 1993. 'I conclude not: Toward a pragmatic account of metadiscourse,' Rhetoric Review 11/2: 265-89.
27. Martin, J. R. 1992. English Text: System and Structure. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
28. Martin, J. R. 2001. 'Beyond exchange: APPRAISAL systems in English' in S. Hunston and G. Thompson (eds): Evaluation in Text. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 142-75.
29. Martin, J. R. and D. Rose. 2003. Working with Discourse: Meaning beyond the clause. London: Continuum.
30. Mauranen, A. 1993a. 'Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Finnish-English Economics texts,' English for Specific Purposes 12: 3-22.
31. Mauranen, A. 1993b. Cultural Differences in Academic Rhetoric. Frankfort: Peter Lang.
32. Myers, G. 1990. Writing Biology. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
33. Palmer, F. 1990. Modality and the English Modals 2nd edn. London: Longman.
34. Schiffrin, D. 1980. 'Metatalk: Organisational and evaluative brackets in discourse,' Sociological Inquiry: Language and social interaction 50: 199-236.
35. Swales, J. 1990. Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge Uuniversity Press.
36. Taavitsainen, I. 1999. 'Metadiscursive practices and the evolution of early English medical writing (1375-1550)' in J. M. Kirk (ed.): Corpora Galore: Analyses and Techniques in Describing English. Amsterdam: Rodopi, pp. 191-207.
37. Thompson, G. 2001 'Interaction in academic writing: Learning to argue with the reader,' Applied Linguistics 22/1: 58-78.
38. Valero-Garces, C. 1996. 'Contrastive ESP rhetoric: Metatext in Spanish-English Economics texts,' English for Specific Purposes 15/4: 279-94.
39. Vande Kopple, W. 1985. 'Some exploratory discourse on metadiscourse,' College Composition and Communication 36: 82-93.
40. Vande Kopple, W. 2002. 'Metadiscourse, discourse, and issues in composition and rhetoric' in E. Barton and G. Stygall (eds): Discourse Studies in Composition. Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press, pp. 91-113.
41. Williams, J. 1981. Style: Ten Lessons in Clarity and Grace. Boston: Scott Foresman.