EIL curriculum development

Principles and Practices for Teaching English as an International Language

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages 147-167

  Brown, James Dean ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84886001745     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203819159     Document Type: Chapter

References (67)

1. Allison, D. (1996). Pragmatist discourse and English for academic purposes. English for Specific Purposes, 15(2), 85-103.
2. Alptekin, C. (2002). Towards intercultural communicative competence in ELT. ELT Journal, 56(1), 57-64.
3. Arva, V., & Medgyes, P. (2000). Native and non-native teachers in the classroom. System, 28(3), 355-372.
4. Benesch, S. (2001). Critical English for academic purposes: Theory, politics andpractice. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Braine, G. (Ed.) (1999). Non-native educators in English language teaching. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
6. Brown, J. D. (1989). Language program evaluation: A synthesis of existing possibilities. In K. Johnson (Ed.), The second language curriculum (pp. 222-241). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Brown, J. D. (1995a). The elements of language curriculum: A systematic approachto program development. New York: Heinle & Heinle.
8. Brown, J. D. (1995b). Language program evaluation: Problems and solutions. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 227-248.
9. Brown, J. D. (2001). Using surveys in language programs. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Brown, J. D. (2005). Testing in language programs: A comprehensive guide toEnglish language assessment (New ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
11. Brown, J. D. (2006). Second language studies: Curriculum development. In K. Brown (Ed.), Encyclopedia of language and linguistics (2nd ed.; Volume 11, pp. 102-110). Oxford: Elsevier.
12. Brown, J. D. (2009). Foreign and second language needs analysis. In M. H. Long & C. J. Doughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 269-293). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
13. Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. (2002). Criterion-referenced language testing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Brown, J. D., & Rodgers, T. (2002). Doing second language research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
15. Cadman, K. (2002). English for academic possibilities: The research proposal as a contested site in postgraduate genre pedagogy. Journal of English for AcademicPurposes, 1(2), 85-104.
16. Carver, D. (1983). Some propositions about ESP. The ESP Journal, 2, 131-137.
17. Cortazzi, M., & Jin, L. (1999). Cultural mirrors: Materials and methods in the EFL classroom. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Culture in second language teaching (pp. 196-219). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
18. Davidson, F., & Lynch, B. K. (2003). Testcraft: A teacher’s guide to writing andusing language test specifications. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
19. Derewianka, B. (2003). Trends and issues in genre-based approaches. RELCJournal, 34(2), 133-154.
20. Deterding, D., & Kirkpatrick, A. (2006). Emerging South-East Asian Englishes and intelligibility. World Englishes, 25(3/4), 391-409.
21. Farrell, T. S. C. (2008). Reflective language teaching: From research to practice. New York: Continuum International.
22. Grzega, J. (2005). Reflections on concepts of English for Europe: British English, American English, Euro-English, Global English. Journal for EuroLinguistiX,2, 44-64.
23. Jenkins, J. (1998). Which pronunciation norms and models for English as an international language? ELT Journal, 52(2), 119-126.
24. Jenkins, J. (2000). The phonology of English as an international language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Jenkins, J. (2002). A sociolinguistically based, empirically researched pronunciation syllabus for English as an international language. Applied Linguistics, 23(1), 83-103.
26. Jenkins, J. (2004). Research in teaching pronunciation and intonation. AnnualReview of Applied Linguistics, 24, 109-125.
27. Jenkins, J. (2009). English as a lingua franca: Interpretations and attitudes. WorldEnglishes, 28(2), 200-207.
28. Kachru, B. B. (1985). Standards, codification, and sociolinguistic realism: The English language in the outer circle. In R. Quirk & H. Widdowson (Eds.), English in the world: Teaching and learning of language and literature (pp. 11-30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Kachru, B. B. (1986). The power and politics of English. World Englishes, 5(2/3), 121-140.
30. Kirkpatrick, A. (2007a). Setting attainable and appropriate English language targets in multilingual settings: A case for Hong Kong. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 17(3), 376-391.
31. Kirkpatrick, A. (2007b). World Englishes: Implications for internationalcommunication and English language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
32. Kirkpatrick, A. (2008). English as the official working language of the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN): Features and strategies. English Today,24(2), 27-34.
33. Kirkpatrick, A., Deterding, D., & Wong, J. (2008). The international intelligibility of Hong Kong English. World Englishes, 27(3/4), 359-377.
34. Kramsch, C., & Sullivan, P. (1996). Appropriate pedagogy. ELT Journal, 50(3), 199-212.
35. Lanteigne, B. (2006). Regionally specific tasks of non-western English language use. TESL-EJ, 10(2), 1-19.
36. Li, D. C. S. (2007). Researching and teaching China and Hong Kong English. English Today, 23(3/4), 11-17.
37. Lin, B. (2002). English as an international language: Discourse as an answer to what to teach and how to teach it (pp. 1-16). Conference proceedings of the 7thannual Conference of Pan-Pacific Association of Applied Lingustics. Retrieved January 7, 2011 from http://www.paaljapan.org/resources/proceedings/ PAAL7/pdfs/01benedict.pdf
38. Llurda, E. (2004). Non-native-speaker teachers and English as an international language. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 14(3), 314-323.
39. Llurda, E. (Ed.) (2005). Non-native-speaker teachers: Perceptions, challenges, andcontributions to the field. New York: Springer.
40. Long, M. H. (Ed.) (2005). Second language needs analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
41. Maley, A. (2010). The reality of EIL and the myth of ELF. In C. Gagliardi & A. Maley (Eds.), EIL, ELF, global English: Teaching and learning issues (pp. 25-44). Bern: Peter Lang.
42. Matsuda, A. (2003). World Englishes in teaching English as an international language. TESOL Quarterly, 37(4), 719-729.
43. Mauranen, A. (2003). The corpus of English as lingua franca in academic settings. TESOL Quarterly, 37(3), 513-527.
44. McDonough, J., & Shaw, C. (2003). Materials and methods in ELT: A teacher’sguide (2nd ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.
45. McKay, S. (1978). Syllabuses: Structural, situational, notional. TESOL Newsletter,12(5), 11.
46. McKay, S. L. (2001). Teaching English as an International Language: Implications for cultural materials in the classroom. TESOL Journal, 9(4), 7-11.
47. McKay, S. L. (2002). Teaching English as an international language: Rethinkinggoals and perspectives. New York: Oxford University Press.
48. McKay, S. L. (2003a). Teaching English as an international language: The Chilean context. ELT Journal, 57(2), 139-148.
49. McKay, S. L. (2003b). Toward an appropriate EIL pedagogy: Re-examining common ELT assumptions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 13(1), 1-22.
50. McKay, S. L. (2003c). EIL curriculum development. RELC Journal, 34(1), 31-47.
51. Medgyes, P. (2001). When the teacher is a non-native speaker. In M. Celce-Murcia (Ed.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 429-442). Boston: Heinle & Heinle.
52. Melchers, G., & Shaw, P. (2003). World Englishes. London: Arnold.
53. Nickerson, C. (2005). English as a lingua franca in international business contexts. English for Specific Purposes, 24(4), 367-380.
54. Norris, J. M., Davis, J. McE., Sinicrope, C., & Watanabe, Y. (2009). Towarduseful program evaluation in college foreign language education. Honolulu, HI: National Foreign Language Resource Center.
55. Nunn, R. (2005). Competence and teaching English as an international language. Asian EFL Journal, 7(3), 61-75.
56. Pennycook, A. (1997). Vulgar pragmatism, critical pragmatism, and EAP. Englishfor Specific Purposes, 16(4), 253-270.
57. Pickering, L. (2006). Current research on intelligibility in English as a lingua franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26, 219-233.
58. Saraceni, M. (2008). English as a lingua franca: Between form and function. English Today, 24(2), 20-26.
59. Seidlhofer, B. (1999). Double standards: Teacher education in the Expanding Circle. World Englishes, 18(2), 233-245.
60. Seidlhofer, B. (2001). Closing a conceptual gap: The case for the description of English as a lingua franca. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 133-158.
61. Seidlhofer, B. (2004). Research perspectives on teaching English as a lingua franca. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24, 209-239.
62. Seidlhofer, B. (2005). English as a lingua franca. Oxford advanced learner’sdictionary of current English (7th ed., p. R 92). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
63. Seidlhofer, B., Breiteneder, A., & Pitzl, M. (2006). English as a lingua franca in Europe: Challenges for applied linguistics. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 26, 3-34.
64. Sewell, A. (2010). Research methods and intelligibility studies. World Englishes,29(2), 257-269.
65. Sifakis, N. C., & Sougari, A.-M. (2005). Pronunciation issues and EIL pedagogy in the periphery: A survey of Greek state school teachers’ beliefs. TESOL Quarterly, 39(3), 467-488.
66. Tomlinson, B. (1998). Materials development for language teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
67. Tomlinson, B. (Ed.) (2002). Developing materials for language teaching. New York: Continuum International.