Improving ethanol yield in acetate-reducing Saccharomyces cerevisiae by cofactor engineering of 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase and deletion of ALD6

Microbial Cell Factories

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Papapetridis, Ioannis ^a   Van Dijk, Marlous ^a   Dobbe, Arthur PA ^a   Metz, Benjamin ^a   Pronk, Jack T ^a   Maris, Antonius J A ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

6 phosphogluconate dehydrogenase; Acetic acid; NADH; NADPH; Redox metabolism; Yeast

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID; ALCOHOL; ALDEHYDE DEHYDROGENASE; GLUCOSE; GLYCEROL; NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE; NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE PHOSPHATE; PENTOSE PHOSPHATE; PHOSPHOGLUCONATE DEHYDROGENASE; REDUCED NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE; ALDEHYDE DEHYDROGENASE (NAD(P)+);

ALD6 GENE; ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BIOMASS; BIOSYNTHESIS; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ENZYME ENGINEERING; FUNGAL STRAIN; GENE; GENE CASSETTE; GENE DELETION; NONHUMAN; PLASMID; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STOICHIOMETRY; ANAEROBIC GROWTH; FERMENTATION; GENETICS; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; METABOLISM; OXIDATION REDUCTION REACTION; PENTOSE PHOSPHATE CYCLE; PROCEDURES; TRANSGENIC ORGANISM;

ACETIC ACID; ALDEHYDE OXIDOREDUCTASES; ANAEROBIOSIS; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; GENE DELETION; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; NADP; ORGANISMS, GENETICALLY MODIFIED; OXIDATION-REDUCTION; PENTOSE PHOSPHATE PATHWAY; PHOSPHOGLUCONATE DEHYDROGENASE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

EID: 84965052624     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14752859     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12934-016-0465-z     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Albertyn J, Hohmann S, Thevelein JM, Prior BA. GPD1, which encodes glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, is essential for growth under osmotic stress in Saccharomyces cerevisiae, and its expression is regulated by the high-osmolarity glycerol response pathway. Mol Cell Biol. 1994;14:4135-44.
2. Bellissimi E, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT, van Maris AJA. Effects of acetic acid on the kinetics of xylose fermentation by an engineered, xylose-isomerase-based Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain. FEMS Yeast Res. 2009;9:358-64.
3. +) in acquired osmotolerance of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Bacteriol. 1989;171:1087-92.
4. Bruinenberg PM, van Dijken JP, Scheffers WA. A theoretical analysis of NADPH production and consumption in yeasts. J Gen Microbiol. 1983;129:953-64.
5. Cambon B, Monteil V, Remize F, Camarasa C, Dequin S. Effects of GPD1 overexpression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae commercial wine yeast strains lacking ALD6 genes. Appl Environ Microb. 2006;72:4688-94.
6. Celton M, Goelzer A, Camarasa C, Fromion V, Dequin S. A constraint-based model analysis of the metabolic consequences of increased NADPH oxidation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab Eng. 2012;14:366-79.
7. Celton M, Sanchez I, Goelzer A, Fromion V, Camarasa C, Dequin S. A comparative transcriptomic, fluxomic and metabolomic analysis of the response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to increases in NADPH oxidation. BMC Genom. 2012;13:317.
8. Chistoserdova L, Gomelsky L, Vorholt JA, Gomelsky M, Tsygankov YD, Lidstrom ME. Analysis of two formaldehyde oxidation pathways in Methylobacillus flagellatus KT, a ribulose monophosphate cycle methylotroph. Microbiology. 2000;146:233-8.
9. Ciriacy M. Genetics of alcohol dehydrogenase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mutat Res-Fund Mol M. 1975;29:315-25.
10. Cunha JT, Aguiar TQ, Romaní A, Oliveira C, Domingues L. Contribution of PRS3, RPB4 and ZWF1 to the resistance of industrial Saccharomyces cerevisiae CCUG53310 and PE-2 strains to lignocellulosic hydrolysate-derived inhibitors. Bioresour Technol. 2015;191:7-16.
11. DiCarlo JE, Norville JE, Mali P, Rios X, Aach J, Church GM. Genome engineering in Saccharomyces cerevisiae using CRISPR-Cas systems. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41:4336-43.
12. Eglinton JM, Heinrich AJ, Pollnitz AP, Langridge P, Henschke PA, de Barros Lopes M. Decreasing acetic acid accumulation by a glycerol overproducing strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by deleting the ALD6 aldehyde dehydrogenase gene. Yeast. 2002;19:295-301.
13. Entian KD, Kötter P. Yeast genetic strain and plasmid collections. Method Microbiol. 2007;36:629-66.
14. Etschmann M, Bluemke W, Sell D, Schrader J. Biotechnological production of 2-phenylethanol. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2002;59:1-8.
15. Flikweert MT, de Swaaf M, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. Growth requirements of pyruvate-decarboxylase-negative Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1999;174:73-9.
16. Gietz RD, Woods RA. Transformation of yeast by lithium acetate/single-stranded carrier DNA/polyethylene glycol method. Methods Enzymol. 2002;350:87-96.
17. Gorsich SW, Dien BS, Nichols NN, Slininger PJ, Liu ZL, Skory CD. Tolerance to furfural-induced stress is associated with pentose phosphate pathway genes ZWF1, GND1, RPE1, and TKL1 in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006;71:339-49.
18. Grabowska D, Chelstowska A. The ALD6 gene product is indispensable for providing NADPH in yeast cells lacking glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity. J Biol Chem. 2003;278:13984-8.
19. Guadalupe-Medina V, Metz B, Oud B, van der Graaf CM, Mans R, Pronk JT, van Maris AJA. Evolutionary engineering of a glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase-negative, acetate-reducing Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain enables anaerobic growth at high glucose concentrations. Microb Biotechnol. 2014;7:44-53.
20. Guadalupe-Medina V, Almering MJH, van Maris AJA, Pronk JT. Elimination of glycerol production in anaerobic cultures of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain engineered to use acetic acid as an electron acceptor. Appl Environ Microb. 2010;76:190-5.
21. Guadalupe-Medina V, Wisselink H, Luttik M, de Hulster E, Daran J-M, Pronk JT, van Maris AJA. Carbon dioxide fixation by Calvin-Cycle enzymes improves ethanol yield in yeast. Biotechnol Biofuels. 2013;6:125.
22. Hahn-Hägerdal B, Karhumaa K, Fonseca C, Spencer-Martins I, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. Towards industrial pentose-fermenting yeast strains. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2007;74:937-53.
23. Hasunuma T, Sanda T, Yamada R, Yoshimura K, Ishii J, Kondo A. Metabolic pathway engineering based on metabolomics confers acetic and formic acid tolerance to a recombinant xylose-fermenting strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact. 2011;10:2.
24. Henningsen BM, Hon S, Covalla SF, Sonu C, Argyros DA, Barrett TF, Wiswall E, Froehlich AC, Zelle RM. Increasing anaerobic acetate consumption and ethanol yield in Saccharomyces cerevisiae with NADPH-specific alcohol dehydrogenase. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81:8108-17.
25. Hubmann G, Guillouet S, Nevoigt E. Gpd1 and Gpd2 fine-tuning for sustainable reduction of glycerol formation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77:5857-67.
26. Jeppsson M, Johansson B, Jensen PR, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Gorwa-Grauslund MF. The level of glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity strongly influences xylose fermentation and inhibitor sensitivity in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. Yeast. 2003;20:1263-72.
27. Keating JD, Panganiban C, Mansfield SD. Tolerance and adaptation of ethanologenic yeasts to lignocellulosic inhibitory compounds. Biotechnol Bioeng. 2006;93:1196-206.
28. Klinke HB, Thomsen AB, Ahring BK. Inhibition of ethanol-producing yeast and bacteria by degradation products produced during pre-treatment of biomass. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004;66:10-26.
29. Koopman F, Beekwilder J, Crimi B, van Houwelingen A, Hall RD, Bosch D, van Maris AJA, Pronk JT, Daran J-M. De novo production of the flavonoid naringenin in engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microb Cell Fact. 2012;11:155.
30. Kozak BU, van Rossum HM, Benjamin KR, Wu L, Daran J-M, Pronk JT, van Maris AJA. Replacement of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae acetyl-CoA synthetases by alternative pathways for cytosolic acetyl-CoA synthesis. Metab Eng. 2014;21:46-59.
31. Kutyna DR, Varela C, Henschke PA, Chambers PJ, Stanley GA. Microbiological approaches to lowering ethanol concentration in wine. Trends Food Sci Tech. 2010;21:293-302.
32. Larsson S, Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B, Tengborg C, Stenberg K, Zacchi G, Nilvebrant NO. The generation of fermentation inhibitors during dilute acid hydrolysis of softwood. Enzyme Microb Tech. 1999;24:151-9.
33. Mans R, van Rossum HM, Wijsman M, Backx A, Kuijpers NG, van den Broek M, Daran-Lapujade P, Pronk JT, van Maris AJA, Daran J-M. CRISPR/Cas9: a molecular Swiss army knife for simultaneous introduction of multiple genetic modifications in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2015;15:fov004.
34. Michnick S, Roustan JL, Remize F, Barre P, Dequin S. Modulation of glycerol and ethanol yields during alcoholic fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains overexpressed or disrupted for GPD1 encoding glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Yeast. 1997;13:783-93.
35. Mira N, Palma M, Guerreiro J, Sa-Correia I. Genome-wide identification of Saccharomyces cerevisiae genes required for tolerance to acetic acid. Microb Cell Fact. 2010;9:79.
36. Müller UM, Wu L, Raamsdonk LM, Winkler AA. Acetyl-coa producing enzymes in yeast. PCT/EP2008/059119(WO2009013159 A2). 30-9-2010.
37. Nevoigt E, Kohnke J, Fischer CR, Alper H, Stahl U, Stephanopoulos G. Engineering of promoter replacement cassettes for fine-tuning of gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72:5266-73.
38. Nielsen J, Larsson C, van Maris AJA, Pronk JT. Metabolic engineering of yeast for production of fuels and chemicals. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2013;24:398-404.
39. Nijkamp JF, van den Broek M, Datema E, de Kok S, Bosman L, Luttik MA, Daran-Lapujade P, Vongsangnak W, Nielsen J, Heijne WHM, Klaassen P, Paddon CJ, Platt D, Kötter P, van Ham RC, Reinders MJT, Pronk JT, de Ridder D, Daran J-M. De novo sequencing, assembly and analysis of the genome of the laboratory strain Saccharomyces cerevisiae CEN.PK113-7D, a model for modern industrial biotechnology. Microb Cell Fact. 2012;11:36.
40. Noble AC, Bursick GF. The contribution of glycerol to perceived viscosity and sweetness in white wine. Am J Enol Viticult. 1984;35:110-2.
41. Nogae I, Johnston M. Isolation and characterization of the ZWF1 gene of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, encoding glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase. Gene. 1990;96:161-9.
42. Orij R, Urbanus M, Vizeacoumar F, Giaever G, Boone C, Nislow C, Brul S, Smits G. Genome-wide analysis of intracellular pH reveals quantitative control of cell division rate by pHc in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Genome Biol. 2012;13:R80.
43. Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. I: inhibition and detoxification. Bioresour Technol. 2000;74:17-24.
44. Palmqvist E, Hahn-Hägerdal B. Fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysates. II: inhibitors and mechanisms of inhibition. Bioresour Technol. 2000;74:25-33.
45. Pampulha ME, Loureiro-Dias MC. Activity of glycolytic enzymes of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in the presence of acetic acid. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 1990;34:375-80.
46. Pampulha ME, Loureiro-Dias MC. Energetics of the effect of acetic acid on growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000;184:69-72.
47. Parawira W, Tekere M. Biotechnological strategies to overcome inhibitors in lignocellulose hydrolysates for ethanol production: review. Crit Rev Biotechnol. 2010;31:20-31.
48. Rauch B, Pahlke J, Schweiger P, Deppenmeier U. Characterization of enzymes involved in the central metabolism of Gluconobacter oxydans. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;88:711-8.
49. Roubos JA, van Noel N, Peij VNNM. A method for achieving improved polypeptide expression. PCT/EP2007/055943(WO2008000632 A1). 3-1-2008.
50. + -dependent Ald6p and Ald5p isoforms play a major role in acetate formation. Microbiology. 2004;150:2209-20.
51. Sanda T, Hasunuma T, Matsuda F, Kondo A. Repeated-batch fermentation of lignocellulosic hydrolysate to ethanol using a hybrid Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain metabolically engineered for tolerance to acetic and formic acids. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102:7917-24.
52. Schmidtke LM, Blackman JW, Agboola SO. Production technologies for reduced alcoholic wines. J Food Sci. 2012;77:R25-41.
53. Shen B, Hohmann S, Jensen RG, Bohnert H. Roles of sugar alcohols in osmotic stress adaptation. Replacement of glycerol by mannitol and sorbitol in yeast. Plant Physiol. 1999;121:45-52.
54. Sinha A, Maitra PK. Induction of specific enzymes of the oxidative pentose phosphate pathway by glucono-δ-lactone in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Gen Microbiol. 1992;138:1865-73.
55. Smith J, van Rensburg E, Gorgens J. Simultaneously improving xylose fermentation and tolerance to lignocellulosic inhibitors through evolutionary engineering of recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae harbouring xylose isomerase. BMC Biotechnol. 2014;14:41.
56. Solis-Escalante D, Kuijpers NGA, Bongaerts N, Bolat I, Bosman L, Pronk JT, Daran J-M, Daran-Lapujade P. amdSYM, a new dominant recyclable marker cassette for Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2013;13:126-39.
57. +-dependent 6-phosphogluconate dehydrogenase (decarboxylating). Soil Biol Biochem. 2001;33:339-43.
58. Swinnen S, Fernández-Niño M, González-Ramos D, van Maris AJA, Nevoigt E. The fraction of cells that resume growth after acetic acid addition is a strain-dependent parameter of acetic acid tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2014;14:642-53.
59. Taherzadeh MJ, Karimi K. Chapter 12-fermentation inhibitors in ethanol processes and different strategies to reduce their effects. In: Gnansounou APL, editor. Biofuels. Amsterdam: Academic Press; 2011. p. 287-311.
60. Thomas KC, Hynes SH, Ingledew WM. Influence of medium buffering capacity on inhibition of Saccharomyces cerevisiae growth by acetic and lactic acids. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002;68:1616-23.
61. Tilloy V, Ortiz-Julien A, Dequin S. Reduction of ethanol yield and improvement of glycerol formation by adaptive evolution of the wine yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae under hyperosmotic conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2014;80:2623-32.
62. van den Berg MA, de Jong-Gubbels P, Kortland CJ, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT, Steensma HY. The two acetyl-coenzyme A synthetases of Saccharomyces cerevisiae differ with respect to kinetic properties and transcriptional regulation. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:28953-9.
63. van Dijken JP, Scheffers WA. Redox balances in the metabolism of sugars by yeasts. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1986;32:199-224.
64. van Maris AJA, Abbott DA, Bellissimi E, van den Brink J, Kuyper M, Luttik MA, Wisselink HW, Scheffers WA, van Dijken JP, Pronk JT. Alcoholic fermentation of carbon sources in biomass hydrolysates by Saccharomyces cerevisiae: current status. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2006;90:391-418.
65. Varela C, Kutyna DR, Solomon MR, Black CA, Borneman A, Henschke PA, Pretorius IS, Chambers PJ. Evaluation of gene modification strategies for the development of low-alcohol-wine yeasts. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2012;78:6068-77.
66. Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA, van Dijken JP. Energetics of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in anaerobic glucose-limited chemostat cultures. J Gen Microbiol. 1990;136:405-12.
67. Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA, van Dijken JP. Effect of benzoic acid on metabolic fluxes in yeasts: a continuous-culture study on the regulation of respiration and alcoholic fermentation. Yeast. 1992;8:501-17.
68. Verduyn C, Postma E, Scheffers WA, van Dijken JP. Physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae in anaerobic glucose-limited chemostat cultures. J Gen Microbiol. 1990;136:395-403.
69. Wiedemann B, Boles E. Codon-optimized bacterial genes improve l-arabinose fermentation in recombinant Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2008;74:2043-50.
70. Wright J, Bellissimi E, de Hulster E, Wagner A, Pronk JT, van Maris AJA. Batch and continuous culture-based selection strategies for acetic acid tolerance in xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 2011;11:299-306.