Evaluation of gene modification strategies for the development of low-alcohol-wine Yeasts

Applied and Environmental Microbiology

Volumn 78, Issue 17, 2012, Pages 6068-6077

  Varela, C ^a   Kutyna, D R ^a   Solomon, M R ^a   Black, C A ^a   Borneman, A ^a   Henschke, P A ^a   Pretorius, I S ^a,b   Chambers, P J ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN WINE RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACETOIN; ALCOHOL CONTENTS; ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES; ANAEROBIC CONDITIONS; CABERNET-SAUVIGNON; CONSUMER DEMANDS; EFFICIENT STRATEGY; ENERGY GENERATIONS; ENERGY PRODUCTIONS; ETHANOL CONCENTRATIONS; ETHANOL FORMATION; ETHANOL PRODUCTION; GENE MODIFICATION; GENETIC BACKGROUNDS; GLOBAL TRENDS; GLYCERALDEHYDE-3-PHOSPHATE DEHYDROGENASE; GLYCEROL PRODUCTION; GRAPE JUICE; HIGH CONCENTRATION; TOXIC METABOLITES; WINE QUALITY; YEAST STRAIN;

ACETALDEHYDE; CARBON DIOXIDE; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; ETHANOL; FRUIT JUICES; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ENGINEERING; GLYCEROL; METABOLITES; YEAST;

WINE;

ALCOHOL DERIVATIVE; CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; GLYCEROL;

ACETALDEHYDE; BIOTECHNOLOGY; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; METABOLITE; YEAST;

ANAEROBIC GROWTH; ARTICLE; ENERGY METABOLISM; FERMENTATION; GENETICS; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; METABOLISM; METHODOLOGY; MICROBIOLOGY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; WINE;

ALCOHOLS; ANAEROBIOSIS; CARBON; CARBON DIOXIDE; ENERGY METABOLISM; FERMENTATION; GLYCEROL; METABOLIC ENGINEERING; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; WINE;

SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; VITACEAE;

EID: 84866150087     PISSN: 00992240     EISSN: 10985336     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1128/AEM.01279-12     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Arikawa Y, et al. 1999. Effect of gene disruptions of the TCA cycle on production of succinic acid in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 87:28-36.
2. Ausubel FM, et al. 2007. Current protocols in molecular biology. John Wiley and Sons, Inc., New York, NY.
3. Biyela BNE, du Toit WJ, Divol B, Malherbe DF, van Rensburg P. 2009. The production of reduced-alcohol wines using Gluzyme Mono (R) 10.000 BG-treated grape juice. S. Afr. J. Enol. Viticult. 30:124-132.
4. Borneman AR, Forgan AH, Chambers PJ, Pretorius IS. 2008. Comparative genome analysis of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strain. FEMS Yeast Res. 8:1185-1195.
5. Cadiere A, Ortiz-Julien A, Camarasa C, Dequin S. 2011. Evolutionary engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast strains with increased in vivo flux through the pentose phosphate pathway. Metab. Eng. 13:263-271.
6. Cambon B, Monteil V, Remize F, Camarasa C, Dequin S. 2006. Effects of GPD1 overexpression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae commercial wine yeast strains lacking ALD6 genes. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:4688-4694.
7. Campagno C, et al. 2001. Alterations of the glucose metabolism in a triose phosphate isomerase-negative Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutant. Yeast 18:663-670.
8. Compagno C, Boschi F, Ranzi BM. 1996. Glycerol production in a triose phosphate isomerase deficient mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Progr. 12:591-595.
9. Cordier H, Mendes F, Vasconcelos I, Francois JM. 2007. A metabolic and genomic study of engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains for high glycerol production. Metab. Eng. 9:364-378.
10. de Barros Lopes M, et al. 2000. Fermentation properties of a wine yeast over-expressing the Saccharomyces cerevisiae glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase gene (GPD2). Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 6:208-215.
11. Dequin S, Barre P. 1994. Mixed lactic acid alcoholic fermentation by Saccharomyces cerevisiae expressing the Lactobacillus casei L(+)-LDH. Biotechnology 12:173-177.
12. de Smidt O, du Preez JC, Albertyn J. 2011. Molecular and physiological aspects of alcohol dehydrogenases in the ethanol metabolism of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Yeast Res. 12:33-47.
13. Drewke C, Thielen J, Ciriacy M. 1990. Ethanol formation in Adho mutants reveals the existence of a novel acetaldehyde reducing activity in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 172:3909-3917.
14. Dukes BC, Butzke CE. 1998. Rapid determination of primary amino acids in grape juice using an o-phthaldialdehyde/N-acetyl-L-cysteine spectrophotometric assay. Am. J. Enol. Viticult. 49:125-134.
15. Eglinton JM, et al. 2002. Decreasing acetic acid accumulation by a glycerol overproducing strain of Saccharomyces cerevisiae by deleting the ALD6 aldehyde dehydrogenase gene. Yeast 19:295-301.
16. Ehsani M, Fernandez MR, Biosca JA, Julien A, Dequin S. 2009. Engineering of 2,3-butanediol dehydrogenase to reduce acetoin formation by glycerol-overproducing, low-alcohol Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 75:3196-3205.
17. Ferreira V, Lopez R, Cacho JF. 2000. Quantitative determination of the odorants of young red wines from different grape varieties. J. Sci. Food Agric. 80:1659-1667.
18. Flikweert M, Deswaaf M, van Dijken J, Pronk J. 1999. Growth requirements of pyruvate-decarboxylase-negative Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 174:73-79.
19. Flikweert M, et al. 1996. Pyruvate decarboxylase: an indispensable enzyme for growth of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on glucose. Yeast 12:247-257.
20. Gawel R, Francis L, Waters E. 2007. Statistical correlations between the in-mouth textural characteristics and the chemical composition of Shiraz wines. J. Agric. Food Chem. 55:2683-2687.
21. Gawel R, van Sluyter S, Waters E. 2007. The effects of ethanol and glycerol on the body and other sensory characteristics of Riesling wines. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 13:38-45.
22. Guth H, Sies A. 2001 Flavour of wines: towards and understanding by reconstitution experiments and an analysis of ethanol's effect on odour activity of key compounds, p 128-139. In Blair RJ, Williams PJ, Høj PB (ed), Proceedings of Eleventh Australian Wine Industry Technical Conference. Australian Wine Industry Technical Conference Inc.
23. Henricsson C, et al. 2005. Engineering of a novel Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine strain with a respiratory phenotype at high external glucose concentrations. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 71:6185-6192.
24. Heux S, Cadiere A, Dequin S. 2008. Glucose utilization of strains lacking PGI1 and expressing a transhydrogenase suggests differences in the pentose phosphate capacity among Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains. FEMS Yeast Res. 8:217-224.
25. Heux S, Sablayrolles JM, Cachon R, Dequin S. 2006. Engineering a Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast that exhibits reduced ethanol production during fermentation under controlled microoxygenation conditions. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 72:5822-5828.
26. Hohmann S. 1991. Characterization of PDC6, a third structural gene for pyruvate decarboxylase in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Bacteriol. 173:7963-7969.
27. Johansson M, Sjostrom JE. 1984. Enhanced production of glycerol in an alcohol dehydrogenase (Adh1) deficient mutant of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biotechnol. Lett. 6:49-54.
28. Klein CJL, Rasmussen JJ, Ronnow B, Olsson L, Nielsen J. 1999. Investigation of the impact of MIG1 and MIG2 on the physiology of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J. Biotechnol. 68:197-212.
29. Kutyna DR, Varela C, Henschke PA, Chambers PJ, Stanley GA. 2010. Microbiological approaches to lowering ethanol concentration in wine. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 21:293-302.
30. Kutyna DR, et al. 2012. Adaptive evolution of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to generate strains with enhanced glycerol production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 93:1175-1184.
31. Luyten K, et al. 1995. Fps1, a yeast member of the MIP family of channel proteins, is a facilitator for glycerol uptake and efflux and is inactive under osmotic stress. EMBO J. 14:1360-1371.
32. Maier G, Roth C, Schmitt RK. 1985. Diastereoselektivität bei der Hydridreduktion acyclischer Diketone (1,2-, 1,3-, 1,4- und 1,5-Induktion). Chem. Ber. 118:704-721.
33. Malherbe DF, du Toit M, Otero RRC, van Rensburg P, Pretorius IS. 2003. Expression of the Aspergillus niger glucose oxidase gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae and its potential applications in wine production. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 61:502-511.
34. Michnick S, Roustan JL, Remize F, Barre P, Dequin S. 1997. Modulation of glycerol and ethanol yields during alcoholic fermentation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains overexpressed or disrupted for GPD1 encoding glycerol 3-phosphate dehydrogenase. Yeast 13:783-793.
35. +] levels enhance glycerol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 12:1331-1337.
36. Overkamp K, et al. 2002. Metabolic engineering of glycerol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68:2814-2821.
37. Peleg Y, Rokem JS, Goldberg I, Pines O. 1990. Inducible overexpression of the FUM1 gene in Saccharomyces cerevisiae: Localization of fumarase and efficient fumaric acid bioconversion to L-malic acid. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 56:2777-2783.
38. Pines O, Shemesh S, Battat E, Goldberg I. 1997. Overexpression of cytosolic malate dehydrogenase (MDH2) causes overproduction of specific organic acids in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 48:248-255.
39. Piskur J, Rozpedowska E, Polakova S, Merico A, Compagno C. 2006. How did Saccharomyces evolve to become a good brewer? Trends Genet. 22:183-186.
40. Pretorius IS. 2000. Tailoring wine yeast for the new millennium: novel approaches to the ancient art of winemaking. Yeast 16:675-729.
41. Pretorius IS, Curtin C, Chambers PJ. 2012. The winemaker's bug: From ancient wisdom to opening new vistas with frontier yeast science. Bioeng. Bugs 3:1-10.
42. Pretorius IS, Høj PB. 2005. Grape and wine biotechnology: challenges, opportunities and potential benefits. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 11:83-108.
43. Pronk J. 1996. Pyruvate metabolism in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Yeast 12:1607-1633.
44. Raghevendran V, Gombert AK, Christensen B, Kotter P, Nielsen J. 2004. Phenotypic characterization of glucose repression mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae using experiments with 13C-labelled glucose. Yeast 21:769-779.
45. Remize F, Barnavon L, Dequin S. 2001. Glycerol export and glycerol-3-phosphate dehydrogenase, but not glycerol phosphatase, are rate limiting for glycerol production in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metab. Eng. 3:301-312.
46. Remize F, Roustan J, Sablayrolles J, Barre P, Dequin S. 1999. Glycerol overproduction by engineered Saccharomyces cerevisiae wine yeast strains leads to substantial changes in by-product formation and to a stimulation of fermentation rate in stationary phase. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 65:143-149.
47. Santangelo GM. 2006. Glucose signaling in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 70:253-282.
48. Schmidt SA, Dillon S, Kolouchova R, Henschke PA, Chambers PJ. 2011. Impacts of variations in elemental nutrient concentration of Chardonnay musts on Saccharomyces cerevisiae fermentation kinetics and wine composition. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 91:365-375.
49. Schmidtke LM, Blackman JW, Agboola SO. 2012. Production technologies for reduced alcoholic wines. J. Food Sci. 77:R25-R41.
50. Scott EW, Baker HV. 1993. Concerted action of the transcriptional activators REB1, RAP1, and GCR1 in the high-level expression of the glycolytic gene TPI. Mol. Cell. Biol. 13:543-550.
51. Selecky R, Smogrovicova D, Sulo P. 2008. Beer with reduced ethanol content produced using Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast deficient in various tricarboxylic acid cycle enzymes. J. Inst. Brewing 114:97-101.
52. Shinohara H. 1984. L'importance des substances volatiles du vin. Formation et effets sur la qualité. Bull. OIV 641/642:606-618.
53. Storici F, Resnick MA. 2006. The delitto perfetto approach to in vivo site-directed mutagenesis and chromosome rearrangements with synthetic oligonucleotides in yeast. Methods Enzymol. 409:329-345.
54. Straus D, Raines R, Kawashima E, Knowles JR, Gilbert W. 1985. Active site of triosephosphate isomerase: In vitro mutagenesis and characterization of an altered enzyme. P. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 82:2272-2276.
55. Swiegers JH, Bartowsky EJ, Henschke PA, Pretorius IS. 2005. Yeast and bacterial modulation of wine aroma and flavour. Aust. J. Grape Wine Res. 11:139-173.
56. Tamas MJ, et al. 2003. A short regulatory domain restricts glycerol transport through yeast Fps1p. Yeast 20:S253-S253.
57. Tamas MJ, et al. 1999. Fps1p controls the accumulation and release of the compatible solute glycerol in yeast osmoregulation. Mol. Microbiol. 31:1087-1104.
58. Varela C, Pizarro F, Agosin E. 2004. Biomass content governs fermentation rate in nitrogen-deficient wine musts. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70:3392-3400.
59. Wudl F, Aharon-Shalom E, Bertz SH. 1981. Pedeuteriotetramethyltetraselenafulvalene. J. Org. Chem. 46:4612-4614.
60. Zhang A, Kong Q, Cao L, Chen X. 2007. Effect of FPS1 deletion on the fermentation properties of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Lett. Appl. Microbiol. 44:212-217.